CITY OF STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN - A CONNECTING COMMUNITIES PLANNING GRANT
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
City of Stow CONNECTIVITY PLAN A connecting communities planning grant City of Stow Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study City Architecture Boulevard Studios May 26, 2022
Acknowledgments Special thanks to Mayor John Pribonic and the Stow Connectivity Plan Steering Committee for their guidance and leadership throughout this process: Mayor John Pribonic, City of Stow Nathan Leppo, City of Stow Jim McCleary, City of Stow Linda Nahrstedt, City of Stow Mike Jones, City of Stow Nick Wren, City of Stow Curtis Baker, AMATS Heather Reidl, AMATS Alex Pesta, City Architecture Krysta Pesarchick, City Architecture Christine Meske, Boulevard Studios 2 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
Contents Acknowledgments Vision 32 Contents Best Practices Big Idea - Loop Network Introduction4 Recommended Approach Project Overview Prioritization Connecting Communities Toolkit Regional Context Prototypes Discover12 Seasons Road Quantitative Analysis Graham Road at Kings Mill Boulevard Quarter Mile Connection Study Springdale Road at Future Veterans Trail Addressing Sidewalk Gaps Connect22 Qualitative Analysis Implementation54 What we heard Next Steps Did You Know? Look for speech bubbles throughout this report calling out important facts from nationally published sources about the importance of a well- connected, multi-modal transportation system. STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 3
Introduction Project Overview 4 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
Project Overview The City of Stow is well positioned to direction for Stow to develop a city-wide become the regional standard for multi- trail network that increases alternative modal infrastructure and connectivity. The transportation options to connect people to findings and recommendations that result places, promotes complete streets principles from this plan can take this city to that next to create vibrant and safe places for all users. level. The City of Stow has been committed to an Through a 2020 Connecting Communities open and transparent process. Throughout Planning Grant, the City of Stow, in the duration of the plan, project updates, partnership with the Akron Metropolitan Area meeting presentations, and opportunities for Transportation Study (AMATS), is pursuing the community to engage and provide input greater connectivity throughout the Greater were hosted on a dedicated project web Akron area while seeking “to plan, fund and page on the city’s website, as well as through construct a trail within a 1/4 mile of every in-person activities. resident and business in the City over the next 20 years.” The project study area was established by the City’s municipal boundary with a look to Stow has used its grant to establish the the surrounding communities for context. framework presented in the following pages This helps to ensure a comprehensive and for a city-wide, multi-modal trail network that complete plan across the entire community will accommodate all users. Once built, this while staying within the bounds of places network will not only serve Stow’s various over which the City has jurisdiction. populations, businesses, and visitors, but will HUDSON connect the city to adjacent and regional DARROW NICHOLSON IC LSONN RA VE TE R NN TR EX A destinations and multi-modal networks. UX QUI CK LOW EL KENDALL PARK BAR L TEREX STOW BAR BIK LO W SU E& BOSTON HUDSON LLIV HIK AN E Seeking to build upon the existing bikeways WE TM OR E and trails, the main objective is to develop a SEASONS NORTON O NO RTO N HIKE strategy to create the missing connections SEASONS & ND BIKE VE LA B A HIBBARD CLE WYOGA LAKE ON ALLEN between these existing assets and the people AKR BIKE & HIKE Franklin ON DS DARROW HU who use them. The city and its partners ARNDALE YOUN G FIS HC RE STEELS CORNERS EK have explored the potential of shared-use STEELS CORNERS NORTHAMPTON ORD WE XF W BRYN MAWR UNKEER BBUNKER BBAUMBERGER BIKE & HIKE CHART paths and side paths as the primary facilities G STOW MBE MARC M AUM GRAHAM for the city’s trail network. The study has BATH G ENGLEWOOD BAIRD also determined the viability of placing trails LE D AR KENT OD KENT WO SILVER LAKE NT HHARR R IN CROSS KE within one-quarter mile of every resident and CUYAHOGA CCHARRING HARDY A E SILLLVER LLAKE SSILVER JENN NINGSS JENNINGS NT LLONGMERE N ME E FALLS O Y BA UR FR ILLE EB business. Project partners solicited input and MUNROE Y OOAAKKW DL MID W NORTH RIVER OOD FALLS STATE Cuyahoga AT H STA 4T PO feedback from the community several times RTTA D 2N AG MUNROE FALLS BIK G ET E Falls E TRAIL RA &H T IKE ON PORTAG ILIL FR 27TH THH CH SSCHOOL throughout the planning process to confirm OA BBROAD SOUTH RIVER HIIGH HIGH I H T M OR LA D NNORTHMORELAND TH 44TH EERRRYY BER TT KE WBE SA C CHESTNUT H S N T AIL the data and help inform and prioritize key TR W EW NEW M TTAAL DO BAILEY EE LM FR AD MUNROE GE CUYAHOGA RIVER focus areas. This resulting plan will provide N T ON CLYD E FR HOWE HOWE MERRIMAN TOWP 261 6 STOW CONNECTIVITY CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN PLAN - DIAGRAM STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE AREA TRANSPORTATION City of Stow - AMATS City Architecture
s Steering Committee Meeting (3-4 Group Meetings) Community Meeting/Presentation (3 Public Sessions) This work is framed around five goals: and identifiable metrics. Additionally, a development framework classifies • Connect people to the planning process interventions based on route and connection • Complete trails & connections via missing types for easy applicability across the City, links / last mile and a “menu” of items for implementation has been created. Big-thinking has been • Design initiatives at key focus areas complemented with implementable initiatives that will establish strategies for incremental • Create implementable plan improvement. • Implement an early win to demonstrate At the conclusion of this work, the proposed & gather momentum concepts and collective recommendations aim to result in immediate implementation, Planning Process with the ultimate goal of comprehensive This planning process was guided by a connections within 20 years. The results Steering Committee made up of elected of this process seek to put the appropriate officials and staff members from the City measures in place to attract and invest in the of Stow, along with staff members from quality and location of trails the community the Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation desires, and enhance the entire connectivity Study. of the Stow community. A brief timeline of the planning process is shown above, highlighting key project milestones and engagement activities. Over the course of 8 months, spanning from August 2021 to February 2022, this dedicated group met on a regular basis to shape the vision for the City’s multi-modal infrastructure. Additionally, community members helped guide the process through a series of three public meetings: a Bike-N- Brainstorm, Community Open House, and a final public presentation and discussion at a City Council Meeting. With affirmation through the engagement process, missing links and key focus areas have been prioritized based on criteria STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 7
Connecting Communities Overview developed through this program should enhance neighborhoods by improving The Connecting Communities Planning transportation connections and promoting Grant program is designed to provide alternative modes of transportation like communities with funding to develop bicycling, walking and transit. Grant funding transportation plans that will lead to the is used to hire a consultant to study a general identification of projects eligible for Akron area of a community. The funds are not Metropolitan Area Transportation Study used for preliminary engineering, but instead (AMATS) funds. to develop plans containing analysis and recommendations. Recommended projects The purpose of these plans is to focus on are then eligible for implementation funding. the concept of livability as it relates to a community’s transportation systems. Plans To begin to change the transportation 8 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
patterns that have created auto-dependent investments. They have been framed around communities and create places that are more the eight recommendations of Connecting vibrant and livable, the planning agency has Communities, listed on the previous page. developed the Connecting Communities program. This helps communities work While many communities in Northeast together and rethink their approach to Ohio have developed trails, our roadway transportation and economic development. infrastructure is primarily geared toward vehicular movement with little thought In AMATS’ words: given to complete streets that provide safe and equitable transportation options within “We can, however, begin to give serious a shared right-of-way. Thankfully, that is thought to a new way of doing things; of changing, with opportunities provided for creating a built environment where walking, planning and implementation through biking, and using public transportation again programs like the AMATS Connecting become a viable option for the majority of Communities Program. With smart our residents; where roads are designed investments in our infrastructure, we can to accommodate a variety of modes of begin to create an interconnected region. transportation; and where public buildings This will lead to: and residential spaces retain their utility, but regain a sense of dignity and an appealing • Increased community health design aesthetic.” • Safer transportation options And this is what Connecting Communities • Improved access and opportunity is all about: Encouraging incremental, small- scale, and practical modifications to the • New investment opportunities way that our transportation systems and • Positive impacts on community character our built environments interact with one another. It is our hope that by following • Positive impacts on the environment the recommendations contained in this document, communities, such as Stow, will When we create neighborhoods and districts become better, more interconnected places that decrease dependence on automobiles, to live. we create healthier, more supportive, and more sustainable communities for all. Goals The recommendations in this document are intended to be used by AMATS and other agencies as a framework for increasing transportation alternatives and supporting land use patterns through targeted STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 9
Regional Context Centrally located in Northeast Ohio, The City of Stow is easily accessible from a variety of nearby municipalities throughout the region. Cleveland, Akron, Canton, Youngstown and Warren are all within a 40-mile radius of the City, making it well-positioned to lead the region as a thriving and connected community. This convenient proximity and accessibility can be leveraged to advance the City’s growth, prosperity, and success far into the future. The City of Stow has historically been deliberate about its growth and development, much of which occurred very rapidly during the middle of the last century. That intentionality can be seen in its balance of high-quality schools, business and industrial development, established residential neighborhoods, and quality civic amenities. Additionally, Stow has existing connections to surrounding parks, trails and natural assets, including the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Summit Metro Parks and municipal parks. It is through these partnerships that Stow has been able to position itself as a regional leader in developing off-road trail systems and provides an immense opportunity for new and enhanced community connections. 10 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
willoughby chardon beachwood cleveland lorain strongsville twinsburg warren stow 40 20 10 5 distance (miles) youngstown akron alliance mansfield north canton wooster canton N STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 11
Discover Existing Conditions 12 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
2 STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 13
Quantitative Analysis As part of the City of Stow’s Connecting While examining the data, a few topics Communities Grant Application, a series began to stand out: Pedestrian and Bicycle of existing conditions and analysis maps Crashes, Assets & Destinations, and Existing were developed by AMATS. These maps, Connections. highlighted on the following pages, help to identify where challenges and opportunities Crashes & Safety presently exist while guiding ultimate Safety was identified as a primary concern recommendations. within the community. One dataset mapped There was a two-pronged approach taken and quantified all the pedestrian and bicycle to analyze the existing conditions of the city: crashes that occurred within the City of Stow Quantitative and Qualitative. The first consists between 2015 and 2021. Of the 35 total of data collection, mapping, and statistics. occurrences, 29% resulted in a serious injury The second part is much more interactive, or fatality. Another 49% sustained injuries that with site visits occurring from different were non-incapacitating. It is the goal of the vantage points (modes of transportation) and community to eliminate all traffic fatalities gathering concerns and suggestions from and severe injuries while increasing safe, locals, who are the true experts of their city. healthy, equitable mobility for all. This is the mission of the Vision Zero Network, which At the outset of this project, AMATS set the could be a resource to Stow moving forward. tone with an incredibly detailed Discovery Document. This is a standard part of the Connecting Communities Grant Program. Within it, there are a series of existing conditions maps covering a wide range of information including zoning; ownership; roadway types, locations, and conditions; existing and missing pedestrian scale connections; transportation routes and locations; traffic counts; and locations of large employers. These maps helped to identify where challenges and opportunities presently exist. This information supported a deeper analytical dive into the existing trail and sidewalk connections, to identify missing connections, and an initial set of priority locations for further study. AMATS supplied the raw data tables, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) files, and many photographs of the existing conditions. 14 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
Narrowing a roadway lane width (physically or visually) by 1 ft. reduces car speed by 7 mph.* *Source: WalkBoston.org, accessed Feb. 2022. St ow Rd 2 1 3 Seasons Rd Seasons Rd Darrowville Norton Rd Dr Mc Ca on ule yR Silver Springs ds d 3 3 Hu 8 Park Hibbard Dr d Young Rd A ll e n R Fi sh 2 1 cr Call Rd ee k y St ow Rd R d Pedestrian and 43 4 2 1 3 Steels Cor ner s Rd Seasons Rd Seasons Rd Darrowville Norton Rd Bicycle Crashes 2 Dr 2015-2021 3 Mc Ca on ule yR Silver Springs 28 ds d 35 3 Hu Park Crash Severity Hibbard Dr d d R Young Rd A ll e n R w W y o ga L a Fi 1=Fatal 3 to sh S 2 1 cr 2=Serious Injury Call Rd 3 ee Fi k 3=Non incapacitating injury R sh 3 S t ow d 2 Hud s o n D r 2 cr 4=Possible injury 43 4 G r aham Rd G raham Rd 5 ee 3 ke 5=Property damage only E Steels Cor ner s Rd 2 k 3 2 R 3 Rd Stow 3 d 4 2 5 d Rd 5 2 w R 3 3 W y o ga L a / am 3 S to Kent Rd 3 h 3 3 3 34 Fi ra sh G S t ow 2 Huds on D r 8 2 59 5 cr G r aham Rd G raham Rd 5 ee 3 ke B ai k 2 R 3 Rd 3 d 4 le Silver Lake 5 2 3 y Rd 3 Oak 3 0 0.55 1.1 2.2 Miles R m Kent Rd 3 3 ha d a 4 Gr 3 woo 8 59 5 N M ai n B ai dD le Silver Lake Roses Run y Oak f tCrash counts by Crash Severity 0 0.55 1.1 2.2 Miles R Country3Club d r or woo St N M ai n ag e 17 P dD Tr Munroe Falls Ave Roses Run l Cuyahoga Munroe Fallsand Comparison ofor tCrash counts by Crash Severity Pedestrian Country Club 2 1 r St ag Falls e Tr 17 Cuyahoga Munroe Falls Ave Bicycle Crashes Seasons Rd Seasons Rd Darrowville l Munroe Falls Dr 16 Mc St Total Number of Crashes Falls 2015-2021 Ca on ule S Mai n St 14 B yR 2nd St ds ai d 3 S Main St 3 B 12 Hu Munroe Falls 2nd le 8 ai Crash Severity Munroe Falls Hibbard Dr y Rd d le 8 10 ve y Rd Metropolitan A ll e n R 8 Metropolitan ve 8 tA tA 1=Fatal ParkPark as 6 2=Serious Injury th e e as 4 4 r th 4 2 4 4 3=Non incapacitating injury No No r 2 4=Possible injury 0 43 4 5=Property damage only E Steels Cor ner s Rd 1 2 3 4 5 Crash Severity Stow Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study N 3 2 2 3 4 5 5 R Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study w W y o ga L a / Crash Severity 3 to S 3 S t ow Hud so n D r 3 G r aham Rd ke Rd 4 3 Rd 5 2 am K ah 4 STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN Gr 8 15 B ai le Silver Lake y Oa R d
ITE D 8 R RL Meadowbrook Lake Park SUNNYSIDE DR NATIONAL MACHINE CO CA IN T RR IE U CHEROKEE TRL WA ONQ Fishcreek Natural Area Y HIBBARD DR ALG TRILLIUM DR R DD AP NORTON RD SILVE M DR TREESIDE NORTON RD AC R SPR OO SEASONS RD AC HE NO RTO IR INGS TR GANGL DR HIGBY DR TC DR KW BECKETT RIDEG DR NR GIANT EAGLE VILLAGE CT L D R NE ALLEN RD GA R NANT HANSON DIPLOMAT DR MA CH UCKE SUNNYSIDE DR PINE RIDGE DR D ES AUDIO TECHNICA US T LN HEIGHTS DR BLV TN U MCTAGGART RD WRAYCO INDUSTRIES TD COMMERCE DR SERRA VISTA DR DR PARK VISTA CT L MC DR R WU C R D JUNE AVE AU DIANA LYNN DR DR LE FO DE N COX SO YR HO IL DR ME GU SR8 D SIT E CELESTE VIEW DR CAM HAUGHTON CT ROCHELLE ED R MORGAN ADHESIVIES CO HAMPSHIRE RD m n RL NATIONAL MACHINE CO Meadowbrook Lake Park CA Silver Springs Park DUQUESNE DR IN T RITCHIE RD RR IE YOUNG RD U HILARY CIR CHEROKEE TRL WA KINGSDALE DR ONQ DR Y NMTC Fishcreek Natural Area EAGLE AVE SR8 CGB THERAPY & CONSULTING WRENS CIR TIMBERDALE DR HIBBARD DR ALG TRILLIUM DR ON R SHERWOOD DR DD AP SILVER AC HOUSLEY RD DS TREESIDE DR SPRING OO HE IR S DR TR GANGL DR HIGBY DR TC WILLOWDALE DR KW HU L NE TUDOR LN R ALLEN RD GA R HANSON AVE DIPLOMAT DR MA PINE RIDGE DR AUDIO TECHNICA US n m HEIGHTS DR DR AKRON GENERAL PARTNERS COMMERCE DR KE D FOX RUN DR OR DR JUNE AVE ARNDALE RD CLAR COX DR ILF DARROW RD GU L IA HAUGHTON CT CALL RD m n CE ALICIA TRL MORGAN ADHESIVIES RD CO H RD E STEELS CORNERS RD m n TEMPLE TRL HAMPSHIRE RD L ROBIN LN RITCHIE RD ERO TR LE T D ILL KR WOR HILARY CIR GDA KINGSDALE DR DR NMTC MAPLEWOOD RD ECHO VALLEY DR BAILEY RD RW AR EP EAGLE AVE SR8 CGB THERAPY & CONSULTING WRENS CIR TIMBERDALE DR ON OO PL IN ELLS SHERWOOD DR PP MA SPR HOUSLEY RD BOBWHITE TRL LYNNWOOD DR DS CH HI H WILLOWDALE DR GRAFORD LN ER EL W HU EL NN RO IZABET H DR WAXWING TRL TUDOR LN DRESHER TRL SPRINGDALE RD KING DR MH RY N BERKSHIRE RD SS OR FRIAR RD n m CT DR HU UR MA AKRON GENERAL PARTNERS RS ST DR TURNBERRY TRL ARNDALE RD ND BAUMBERGER RD TD DARROW RD DR LIA m n RYDHIL VD R WOODLAKE BLVD CE BRYN MAWR DR LILLIAN RD OW STWICKE BL ALICIA TRL E STEELS CORNERS RD RD E GILWOOD DR NORMAN DR RD TEMPLE TRL L ROBIN LN WIMBLEDON CIR L NEWCOMER RD TH TR LE D HI ILL KR WOR GDA MAPLEWOOD RD ECHO VALLEY DR PROGRESSRD MOHICAN KENNETH RD OSAGE ST BAILEY RD R PARK DR SAMIRA RD RW PA BERR OO LE IN ELLS ST EA P MA GREENTREE RD SPR PP BOBWHITE TRL LYNNWOOD DR CH HI HE GENEVIEVE BLVD CONWILL RD ER EL W EL RO NN LEEWOOD RD RO IZABETH DR WAXWING TRL SPRINGDALE RD KING DR CAMBRIDGE DR MH R N SS BURTON DR BERKSHIRE RD OR YH HANNA RD KAY DR CT DR BERGER AVE KLEIN AVE UR NORTHVIEW DR UR MA PARDEE RD VALLEY FORGE DR ST RD WOODBRIDGE LN SM R W ST ROSE AVE ND BAUMBERGER RD IN D UNIONDALE DR EX DR OK BECKLEY RD DR FO R WOODLAKE BLVD OW OSAGE ST BRYN MAWR DR E W LILLIAN RD BUNKER LN VIRA RD RD RIS E GILWOOD DR NORMAN DR BUNKER BER WIMBLEDON CIR BL LOWES HOME CENTERS INC ST ED LIBERTY RD VD HICKORY TRL R RD MOHICAN RD KENNETH RD DR OSAGE ST DR SAMIRA RD PILGRIM GOLF KENNETH TRL nn mm SAYBROOKE BLVD OW GREENTREE RD KAY DR RD BRIARWOOD LTD GENEVIEVE BLVD CONWILL RD GRAHAM RD ST LEEWOOD RD GILBERT CALEB ST BURTON DR HANNA RD BERGER AVE LAKEVIEW ELEMENTARY RDAVE KLEIN AVE BRO EDGEWOOD DR LAUREL WOODS BLVD NORTHVIEW DR PARDEE RD VALLEY FORGE DR CHEVAL CIR RD OKS ROSE AVE SE ONEIDA ST ID UNIONDALE DR SR IONA BECKLEY RD ED MAISON AINE OW OSAGE ST OAK RD R ALTON AVE VIRA RD NEWCOMER WAL-MART 8 MARHOFER AVE MER LOWES HOME CENTERS INC D LIBERTY RD ST MR m n SANFORD AVE Oregon Trail Park Northport Park WILS CALEB ST ELM RD HA PILGRIM DR nn m DR GOLF GRAH AM RDm RA HILE RD WILLIAMSON RD GILBERT RD BRIARWOOD LTD ON S ADALINE DR G GRAHAM RD HILLCREST DR MARCELLA AVE LAKEVIEW BLVD CALEB ST FRANKLIN RD LAKEVIEW ELEMENTARY STOW-MUNROE FALLS HIGH m n SENECA ST IONA AVE BRO EDGEWOOD DR BAIRD RD NONE T ORCHARD DR OKS BEECH RD OSAGE ST SEARS RD ONEIDA ST ID SR ED OAK RD R ONEIDA ST ALTON AVE VIRA RD WAL-MART 8 MARHOFER AVE MERRIA RD RD SANTOM RD E SANFORD AVE Northport Park T AM ES WILS CALEB ST ELM RD GRAHAM RD AH OR HILE RD TM WILLIAMSON RD GR ON S RD ADALINE DR HILLCREST DR WE MARCELLA AVE LAKEDRUN BLVD LAKEVIEW BLVD EDGEWATER DR KENT R mKENT R FRANKLIN RD n SENECA ST YUKON BAIRD RD T ORCHARD DR MARGARET AVE KAUFFMAN RD BEECH RD OSAGE ST HIWOOD AVE m n ONEIDA ST VIRA RD SANTOM RD E T D OR ES Wetmore Park BLV TM RK RD WE PA RD KENT RD GE F m n NT YUKON OR MARGARET AVE KE G HIWOOD AVE MAPLE RD Wetmore Park AR K BLV D m n KOHLS Adell MACYS GIANT EAGLE Durbin STOW Park GLEN Hiwood Open Space EP ECHO RD RG FRED W ALBRECHT GROCERY CO BY LN GO MAPLE RD Adell Durbin Park Hiwood Open Space DAYTON AVE ECHO RD WHIT AVE POWELL RD TAFT ST DEIDRICK RD MARSH RD VERNER RD ADAMS AVE SARATOGA BLVD HIGHPOINT TRL Legend L E TR TRL SU ELIN RID G IDE FF LS OL HIL K DO WN City of Stow limits S OAKLAWN PARK BLVD NORTH RIVER RD NORTH RIVER RD LN ILL of Stow limits YH OAKLAWN PARK BLVD PIMLICO BLVD R RE Streets SU ets RIVER DOW e Employers Large Employers NS Metro ols m n Schools Metro Parks Bike & Hike Trail s Parks CONNECTIVITY PLAN - ANALYSIS MAP City of Stow STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN - ANALYSIS MAP City Arc Assets & Destinations that draw people – civic institutions, schools, public parks and recreation places, and An interesting dataset that was collected commercial areas. All of these locations are identified locations across the city where community assets that attract a variety of large employers are located. There is a people. The mapping of these destinations diverse range of types of major employers begins to demonstrate potential patterns of within Stow. The key takeaway of this movement for work, school, errands, and information is identification of two main job recreation. hub clusters. These are concentrated in the northwestern and southeastern edges of the Today, most of these trips are completed City. in an automobile, but it raises the question: how many of them could be completed on From an analysis standpoint, this starts to foot or bike? Community connections, trails, inform trip generation through the location and new multi-modal infrastructure should of key destinations. This information was consider these hubs and connect them then layered with other datasets of locations with residential neighborhoods. This would 16 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
Zoning Map Limited Retail (C-2) Community Retail (C-3) n of sum ACRESGeneral by Business Zoning (C-4) Highway Services (C-5) 3083 Office (C-6) C-7 2493 C-8 / Limited Industrial (I-1) Industrial (I-2) Conservation (O) 1533 Residential (R-1) 855 (R-2) Residential 705 521 Residential (R-3) 67 119 34 Residential (R-B) 48 Stow Boundary C-6 C-7 C-8 I-1 I-2 Comparison O R-1 of R-2 sumR-3 R-B ACRES by Zoning 3083 Zoning 3000 Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study 2493 Sum of ACRES / 2000 1533 expand opportunity and access for 855 residents both within residential neighborhoods and 1000 while enhancing their experience 521 of705 traveling between those neighborhoods and adjacent 26 159 250 93 67 119 34 48 to and0 from their destinations. employment and commercial assets. Parcel C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 I-1 I-2 O R-1 R-2 R-3 R-B ownership information shows where the City Additional Data and Information Zoning of Stow has ownership Akron Metropolitan in addition Area Transportation Study to public rights-of-way. This is helpful in determining Additional base data was analyzed at the where future City trail connections and other parcel and roadway levels. The existing City public realm enhancements may be made. zoning map illustrates how the majority It is recommended and preferred that these of the community is made of Residential types of initiatives are made on property that zones, with clustered nodes of both is controlled by the City. industrial and retail/commercial. Similar to the employment and destination maps, Roadway data provided a different type of this zoning analysis presents opportunities information, including roadway types, their to study where better multi-modal and condition, and the amount of traffic on pedestrian connections can be made certain corridors. It is helpful to understand STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 17
Zoning Map Limited Retail (C-2) Community Retail (C-3) n of sum ACRESGeneral by Business Zoning (C-4) Highway Services (C-5) 3083 Office (C-6) C-7 2493 C-8 / Limited Industrial (I-1) Industrial (I-2) Conservation (O) 1533 Residential (R-1) 855 (R-2) Residential 705 521 Residential (R-3) 67 119 34 Residential (R-B) 48 Stow Boundary C-6 C-7 C-8 I-1 I-2 Comparison O R-1 of R-2 sumR-3 R-B ACRES by Zoning 3083 Zoning 3000 Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study 2493 Sum of ACRES / 2000 1533 which roads are classified as either 855 Freeways, intersections require greater attention to 1000 705 Arterials, Collectors, and Locals, 521 because safety, and additional considerations such 159 250 119 26 93 67 34 48 each 0is characterized by certain widths, as buffered or off-road trails to keep users speeds, C-2 andC-3capacities. C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 streets Local I-1 I-2 OareR-1 R-2 R-3 R-B safe from busy traffic. Additionally, knowing Zoning speed limits typically distinguished by slower whereAkronroad pavement Metropolitan conditions Area Transportation Study are poor and fewer vehicular travel lanes than the generally correlates to roadways that are due other classifications, and they provide the for reconstruction or resurfacing. greatest opportunity for new and enhanced multi-modal connections and infrastructure. Whereas different strategies would need to This presents an immense opportunity for be considered to create new and/or safer the integration of new and/or improved non-vehicular transportation options on bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure during the faster, wider, and more highly traveled an already anticipated capital improvement roads (such as collectors and arterials). project. Specifically, higher traveled corridors and 18 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
n R d Ba r low Rd oo k Seasons Rd Seasons Rd Br s Dr M d s 103 er on ac Po w D r Hu Youn g Rd Wyoga Lake Rd Hibbard Dr Ju A lle n R d 60X ds 104 on Fi C o mm erce Dr R sh cr Call Rd ee k 3 Rd 102 10 East Steels Arnd ale Rd Corners 104 102 103 103 Rd Lillian Rd John so n K le i n Ave ow W y o ga La k St 53 Fi Stow sh B aird Rd En glewoo d Dr 51 cr 51 H ud so n D r 60 ee Graham Rd e k X Rd Rd 103 53 Ha rri e t Rd k Cha r rin g Cros s Dr Rd ee 53 Su 103 Cr 53h a m 103 lli E B ath Rd 30 va ut ra 30 n Hiwood Ave R G ln a 5 1 d Ba r W B a ile low Rd ook Silver Lake Seasons Rd Marsh Rd Seasons Rd Stow Transit Map y Br s r M d s 103 Rd Oak nD er ac Po w D o r woo RT NO. Hu N M ai n 0 0.5 1 2 Miles Young Rd Wyoga Lake Rd Hibbard Dr Ju 9 th St Al le n Rd d Dr 60X ds 104 102 N River Rd Fi C o mm erce Dr sh u Po 103 cr eb l dd Call Rd St ee r ta Cuyahoga Mi k ge 104 3 Rd 102 Munroe Falls 10 Tr Munroe Falls Ave l 30 Falls East Steels 1 4 th St Arnd ale Rd 4 th S t 51 Corners 10 t h S t High S t S Riv e r R 104 102 53 d 2nd St S Main St 103 103 Ba Rd Lillian Rd John s 60X K lei n Ave ile ow W yo ga La k / y Rd St 53 Fi Stow sh B aird Rd En glewood Dr 51 cr 51 H ud so n D r 60 ee Graham Rd e k X Rd Rd 103 53 Ha rrie t Rd k Char rin g Cros s Dr Rd ee 53 103 Cr 53h a m 103 E B ath Rd Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study 30 ut ra 30 Hiwood Ave ln G a W 5 1 B a ile Silver Lake Marsh Rd y Rd Oak Lastly, access to the seven transit routes woo N M ai n 0 0.5 1 2 Miles 9 th St d Dr should be prioritized, as they serve Po key N River Rd l dd St locations within Stow and as well r tas ag e adjacent Tr Cuy ahoga Munroe Falls Ave Munroe Falls Mi l Falls communities. Transit stops should have 1 4 th St 4t h S t 10 t h S t convenient and safe access to sidewalks High S t S Riv e r R d 2nd St S Main St Ba and trails, since all transit users are instant ile y Rd pedestrians when they deboard a bus. For these users, that “last mile”, as it is popularly called, between a transit stop Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study and a destination is critical. Addressing gaps in sidewalks and crossing conditions at intersections should be prioritized when determining where the next wave of future connections should occur. STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 19
Quarter Mile Connection Study At project inception, one of the City’s goals bikeway network is very limited in terms of was to determine the viability of placing trails geographic reach, primarily located along within one-quarter mile of every resident main corridors on the perimeters of the and business. This is an ambitious and community. This demonstrates significant respectable goal. It is important to provide potential to expand bicycle infrastructure to supportive infrastructure that increases better support connections within the City accessibility for all. The City currently has 186 and between neighborhoods, while linking miles of sidewalks and 18 miles of bikeways. with surrounding assets. The map to the right demonstrates that this 20 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
Almost 1 out of every 2 adults had at least one chronic illness in 2005. An increase in physical activity, such as walking, lead to improved health and delay or prevention of disease.* *Source: Canada Medical Journal, 2006. In the diagram, each circle represents a point areas are indicative of locations that are not and its surrounding quarter-mile radius. Areas presently served by trails or sidewalks. that are colored green represent locations that are connected to or in close proximity to a trail or designated bike route. Yellow areas identify areas that have some sidewalks but either are not contiguous (meaning there are stretches of missing sidewalks) or are farther than one quarter mile from a trail. Lastly, red STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 21
Connect Learning from the Community 22 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
3 STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 23
Qualitative Analysis As noted earlier, the qualitative analysis takes on a much more interactive and personal approach to information gathering. The planning team spent a considerable amount of time with “boots on the ground” in the City of Stow. Numerous site visits enabled the team to walk, bike, and drive around the community to experience existing conditions firsthand from the various perspectives of everyday travelers. This also provided the opportunity to have chance conversations with other users who could share their experiences with and wishes for the city’s network of connections. In-person experiences gave the team a deeper understanding of the context and situations presented by the data. While the data is incredibly informative to the analysis work and recommendations, it is equally important to get outside and evaluate existing conditions firsthand. This ensures that any suggested interventions are realistic and appropriately scaled. Bike-n-Brainstorm On a rainy Saturday in the fall, the planning team, city staff representatives, and a number of residents and their families braved the elements on an 8-mile group bike ride. Free bike rentals were available courtesy of the Ohio & Erie Canalway Coalition. The pre-mapped route took participants on a loop through the city that traversed a cross- section of varying conditions and road / trail types. The route started and ended at Stow City Hall, went through a series of residential streets, paused at Stow High School, took the off-road Bike and Hike trail north to 24 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
Summary of Meetings • Bike N Brainstorm - October 16, 2021 • Community Open House - November 14, 2021 • City Council Meeting - March 10, 2022 • 3 steering committee meetings at key intervals Young Road where there is a paved on-road shoulder for cyclists, stopped at the Young Road trailhead before continuing west on the Bike and Hike Trail, and finally returned via Stow Road. This gave the group a feel for what conditions were comfortable for cyclists regardless of experience level and which ones were very uncomfortable and in need of intervention and enhancements. The bike ride was followed by group discussion and brainstorming session where the participants shared their thoughts on the experience and some ideas for things that could be done to improve it. Community Meetings In November, the planning team held an open house to update the community on the project’s process, report out on analysis, and gather input. The preliminary data analysis and findings were presented along with some early takeaways about emerging themes. A series of stations were created and set up around the council chambers. Participants could walk around to each station where a combination of informational feedback boards were paired. They were asked to provide their preference on a series of choices and had the chance to talk with a team member about their experiences walking and biking around town. In March, the consultant team presented to City Council a summary of the planning process and final recommendations. There was an opportunity for both community and council member questions with responses and clarifications from the consultant. STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 25
Online Engagement Throughout the planning process, a project Participation in this map activity exceeded web page was maintained on the City of the team’s expectations. The box below Stow’s website. This page provided a brief summarizes the community’s engagement overview and goals of the project, along with with the map. The high amount of cross a project schedule, list of past and upcoming interactions of “likes” and replies between community engagement events, and a members demonstrated agreement and continually updated list of links to resources consensus-building and was a positive and presentations. This was also the central example of civil discourse among residents point for project updates and links to active that was similar to what might take place online activities. during a traditional in-person community meeting. A grand total of 178 visits to the One of the primary online activities was an map that included new visitors and returning interactive map. This was launched at the participants could be considered the end of the Bike-N-Brainstorm event and equivalent of holding three public meetings was accessible via computer, tablet, and and having about 60 people in attendance at smartphone. Individuals who participated each. in the Bike-n-Brainstorm session or had experience with walking and biking in the city were asked to provide their thoughts on the map. Users were able to drag the icons from the top of the page onto the map where they had a specific comment about multi-modal transportation experiences in the city. Topics included places they often Summary of Interactions visit, places they currently bike to, places they • 44 unique users would like to bike to, locations/facilities that need attention, specific ideas or suggestions, • 70 individual data points from 35 and places / things that they like. Space was stakeholders provided for brief or detailed commentary, and there was no limit to the number of • 53 interactions on previously posted comments that one could add. The bike comments (likes + discussions) icons allowed participants to draw a path • 178 total visits (new + returning) by following the on-screen instructions and clicking multiple points along the desired route. They were also able to read comments left by other users and either “like” or “dislike” the original comment and provide a response if they wanted. 26 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 27
Survey 1. Welcome After the November Open House, a brief Please select the option that you most identify with. online survey was created to supplement information gathered from that second community meeting. It was intended to provide residents who were unable to attend an additional opportunity to provide their input on the same items that were asked of attendees at that meeting. The survey was brief, consisting of six questions about the participants’ preferences regarding trails, experience, and amenities. The following images show a summary of the combined results of both in-person and online participants. 2. Trail Types Select the types of trails on which you would feel comfortable biking or walking. (You may choose more than one). 28 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
3. Why I Bike 4. Supportive Infrastructure & Details Select how often you bike for each purpose. Select the images of the amenities that would encourage you to bike more or make your experience better. 5. What is the most important thing the City of Stow can do to improve your biking and/or walking experience? • “Create more sidewalks on roads that don’t have any.” • “Map showing existing and future bike trails in the city.” • “Enhance bike lanes along major roadways.” • “Connectivity is key. All trails should connect to another trail or to a destination. Dead ends or bike lane road shoulders that simply end are worthless. I think Stow is already doing a good job of that so keep that concept…” • “Paved walkways” • “More opportunities to bike on streets that do not have sidewalks or paths.” STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 29
What we heard Emerging Themes Raise awareness (2-fold) After analyzing all of the results from This issue is actually two-sided in Stow. The the community meetings and online first is about enhancing user wayfinding. The engagement activities and comparing them City and the Metroparks have a few really against the findings of the data analysis, a exceptional trails that run through Stow, but few common themes began to emerge. A they are not all well marked as to what they selection of quotes from the community that are or where they go. Additionally, there are demonstrate these points can be read on the no signs indicating connections between next page. trails; once one ends, users don’t know which way to turn to get to the next leg of Safety the route. This is always a high priority with any plan The second side is about increasing of this nature, especially when families and automobile driver awareness and attention. children are involved. The mapped data and There needs to be improved signage, early conversations with City staff members pavement markings, and other physical revealed the concern about vehicular indicators that let motorists know to expect crashes involving pedestrians and bicyclists. bicyclists and pedestrians adjacent to them Comments from residents also brought to or crossing their paths. This comes back full light specific incidents and locations where circle to the earlier theme of safety. they had near misses or felt uncomfortable when walking, riding, or crossing the road. Connect the missing links and complete the network A significant amount of sidewalks can be found throughout the City of Stow, including along main corridors and within residential neighborhoods. The major issue, however, is that they are not contiguous. Some homes and businesses have sidewalks, but they stop at the property line. There are also stretches where entire lots or blocks lack sidewalks. This is a real problem for people who want to walk or bike somewhere because those missing stretches force individuals to move out into the street in areas where that may not be the safest option. 30 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
“Add paths along Seasons Road to provide better connectivity between trails.” “Stow Rd. needs better pedestrian access. With two gas stations and Dollar General many pedestrians are forced to walk on side of road. Safety hazard.” “[Need] signage on Young Rd to notify motorists of bikes, pedestrians, children walking etc on or near roadway due to lack of sidewalks and shoulder.” “Would love to have a safer crossing here, perhaps flashing pedestrian “This [Bike and Hike Trail] signs for the road.” crossing can be pretty dangerous with the amount of traffic on Seasons Road—especially with the increase in heavy vehicles from recently constructed warehouses and other commercial facilities.” “Children and families who live within the Eastwicke Farms subdivision would benefit from having connectivity to Echo Hills school, thus helping cut down on drop off/pick up traffic at Echo Hills as well because kids could walk to bike to school “New sidewalk has a safely.” gap here, forcing people to travel off the sidewalk or make a dangerous crossing over Darrow.” “...with access to sidewalks are a larger shoulder or bikelane, residents could more “Better curb cuts for easily utilize the recreation area just path [and] Better crosswalk up the street without having to signs. [C]ars never stop in drive.” this area.” STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 31
Vision Laying out the Framework 32 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
4 STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 33
Best Practices Once areas of focus are established, the supporting government officials at all levels consideration of best practices from other and empowering cities to take action, places can help to inform relevant design create connections, and support the bike approaches and solutions. industry. They offer a number of resources, guides, and programs to help cities promote One of the resources studied was the and facilitate inclusive and sustainable website for Bicycling Magazine, an transportation. They also have an annual authoritative source for all things biking. The city rating program that ranks cities around organization has ranked the best bike cities in the world for their bike friendliness. Their America. They sift through thousands of data rankings are based on two parts: a Network points and identify the systems and features Score that rates the quality of the bicycle that are of the greatest benefit to riders of all network, and a Community Score that ages and abilities and for all purposes. To rate measures how people feel about biking in a city, they award up to 100 points that are their community. The Network Score looks weighted across four categories: at access to neighborhoods and residents, • Safety (40 possible points) – based on opportunity connections to jobs and schools, rate of cyclist crashes and fatalities, an basic needs and essential services, retail, and active Vision Zero program, and adoption transit connections. The Community Score is / installation of safe streets practices in similar to the rating system used by Bicycling response to or prevention of a fatality. Magazine. For this, a community survey is published that rates responses based on • Friendliness (30 possible points) – based the weighted scoring categories of Safety, on infrastructure that is friendly to all Network, Ridership, and Awareness. users from ages 8-80, including protected bike lanes, safe off-road pathways, and The biggest take away from these case connection to transit routes. studies is that the priorities that emerged from the analysis and community input align • Enthusiasm (20 possible points) – based perfectly with these rating systems. The on city spending and advocacy for bike other important things that can be learned transportation, number of regular bike are the design components and policies that commuters, and not blocking/removing successful cities are implementing to support bike lanes. safer, healthier and more complete networks. • Culture (10 possible points) – based In exploring best practices, a final case study on bike share program(s), bike-friendly takes a look at the trail that was rated number businesses and workplaces, open streets one on USA Today’s 2021 “10 Best Readers’ events, and police relations. Choice” Travel Award Contest. The Chuck Huckelberry Loop in Tucson, Arizona, offers People for Bikes is another national an inspirational concept for the City of Stow. organization whose mission is to get This recreational trail consists of 136 miles more people riding bikes more often, by of paved shared-use paths and buffered bike 34 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
lanes that loop through and around Pima for city branding, artwork, and tourism County, Marana, Oro Valley, Tucson, and attraction. South Tucson. It connects people to parks, bus routes, workplaces, schools, restaurants, The recommendations made later in this hotels, shopping, and entertainment areas. plan will focus on these priorities and While this is significantly larger and more interventions that will work to directly ambitious than what might be reasonably improve the City of Stow’s bicycle network in proposed for the City of Stow, it does a range of areas. illustrate example conditions and design tools that are directly applicable here. It also provides ideas about potential opportunities STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 35
Big Idea - Loop Network After considering the details for a successful door for sponsorship opportunities where bike and pedestrian network, the team funders could contributed to the costs of identified a series of routes that link residents construction for the naming rights of that and their destinations. These routes are loop. a combination of existing and proposed off-road trails and on-street or street- adjacent lanes. A loop approach provides built-in wayfinding and easily understood connections. An analysis of the existing paths and destinations indicated the ability to create a series of easily understood and connected loops. The identified loops and connectors have been strategically located to serve a particular set of users and to meet the project goals: • Fill-in the missing links and gaps in the existing infrastructure • Connect people and places • Increase awareness of the available multi-modal transportation options and locations • Improve visibility of pedestrians and cyclists for automotive users • Add safety design components for all users The loop system offers a unique opportunity for the City of Stow to incorporate fun community branding. The distinctive colors for each of the loops of green, orange, and yellow, and the monikers of “wolf”, “bulldog”, and “puppy” as a play on of the Stow Bulldogs, are two examples of how this could be accomplished. Creating memorable identifiers can help with recognition, wayfinding, and awareness for all users and passersby. This also opens the 36 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
A 2011 study from the University of Cincinnati showed that the property value of a house goes up by $9 for every foot closer it is to a trail entrance.* *Source: UC.edu, 2011, accessed Feb. 2022. Priority Intersections STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 37
Recommended Approach When it comes to prioritizing the Orange Loop improvements, the team sees opportunity in filling in loop connectors throughout the Serving commuters within the city, the city to maximize the impact of investments. “Bulldog Loop” is largely on-road or corridor Mapping these trails as part of this study adjacent. Cyclists on this trail would still find revealed that an infrastructure is already challenge completing its 10-mile length, largely in place, having formed under a were it to be more complete. Completing logical hierarchy by user and location. For the Bulldog would require establishing better example, an outer loop serves as a regional bikeway infrastructure along some of the connector, encircling the edges of the city’s busier thoroughfares. city and connecting in places to trails in Yellow Loop: neighboring communities. While this trail is definitely better suited for experienced These “Puppy Path” connectors give even cyclists, a few breaks in its continuity the youngest cyclists a chance to learn and create impediments to its use by all ability for families of all abilities to bike together. levels. Likewise, shorter bikeways can Routed mostly through interconnected better connect core civic and commercial subdivisions, these pathways are shorter and destinations from local residential areas as find their way through areas where safety is these gaps are addressed. of utmost importance to the residents who live along them, making them appropriate to The study, thus, seeks to identify emergent a wide range of users. loops within city limits and determine connections that will make them more The opportunities to physically connect contiguous and in turn improve their these points on the loop trails will vary by accessibility and usability. A branded system type and existing conditions. In some cases, will go further to make the loops more user the need to incorporate better infrastructure friendly, providing better wayfinding and for cyclists ought to be considered in offerings by ability. tandem with major roadway improvements, especially where pathways follow city Green Loop corridors. Others, however, may present as At 17 miles and circling the city, the “Big low-hanging fruit, in which completion is Wolf Loop” is regional, focusing mostly on no more complicated than land acquisition recreation and connection to other park trails and some asphalt paving. No matter the in the area. While the majority of this loop is level of intensity, however, each will require formed by off-road pathways, it also has the funding that ought to be carefully integrated greatest diversity of missing link typologies in future budget considerations. Grants and therefore provided the case studies for for recreational improvements are widely potential design solutions illustrated in this available; and should be sought to support report. this impactful work. 38 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
Missing Link ID STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 39
Prioritization The following list of locations align with the a series of categories were listed as the illustration on pages 37 and 39. Given that grading criteria: 30 missing links were identified on those maps and recognizing that constructing all • Safety: locations were given a score of of them at once is not feasible, a system was 3 points if there had been a fatal crash, 2 devised for rating each of the connections points for severe crashes, and 1 point for and ultimately identifying the priority ones. A anecdotal comments about near miss number was assigned to each of the missing incidents or uncomfortable experiences. links and they were listed in the chart below. Based on the earlier identified areas of focus, Part of Part of Part of Yellow Awareness/ Green Orange Connec ID Name Safety Children Visibility Loop Loop EW 27 Darrow Rd-Kent Rd intersection 2 3 1 - - 8 Graham Rd (North Side) 2 2 1 - 1 17 Seasons Rd / Norton Rd 3 1 1 1 - 26 Graham Rd-Fishcreek Rd intersection 2 2 1 - 1 2 Call Rd 3 1 - - - 4 Fishcreek Rd (SE from Stow) 2 1 - - 1 6 Fishcreek Rd (NW from Stow) 1 2 - - 1 28 Hibbard Dr-Darrow Rd intersection - 1 1 - 1 30 Stow Rd/Fishcreek Rd intersection 1 1 1 - 1 16 Springdale Rd 1 1 - 1 1 3 Young Rd South of Call Rd 1 1 - - - 18 Darrow Rd - 1 1 - - 20 Stow Rd 2 1 - - - 21 Progress Park Dr - 2 - - - 23 Kent Rd - 3 - - - 25 Graham Rd-Kings Mill Blvd intersection - 1 1 1 - 7 Graham Rd (South of HS) - 1 1 - - 5 Fishcreek Rd (@ Progress Park Dr) - 1 - - 1 22 Newcomer Rd 1 1 - - - 13 Hibbard Dr (east) 1 - - - 1 1 Young Rd - 1 - - - 9 Hillside Trail - 1 - - - 10 Lillian Rd - 1 - - - 14 Hibbard Dr across McCauley Rd - - - - 1 15 Rail line - - - - 1 19 Arndale Rd - - - - - 24 Bike and Hike - 1 - - - 11 Commerce Dr - - - - - 12 Hudson & Campus Dr - - - - - 29 Hudson Dr-Commerce Dr intersection - - - - - 40 CITY OF STOW / AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY / CITY ARCHITECTURE
• Children: locations were given 1, 2, or • Part of an Identified Route: a point was 3 points depending on their proximity to given for each loop or connector the places children were known to frequent, missing link would help extend. e.g. schools, parks, trails. All of the points were then totaled across the • Awareness: a point was given if a rows. The routes were sorted by their total location has high visibility to travelers of score, with the highest scoring items at the STOW CONNECTIVITY - MISSING CONNECTIO all modes and could bring heightened time representing the highest priority items. awareness to anticipate cyclists and pedestrians. Part of Part of of Yellow Yellow ge Connector Connector Total EW NS Index Notes from Mapped Public Comments - - 1 7 1 - - 6 5 for sidewalks - - - 6 8 for better crossing @ BnH trails ; 3 thumbs-up for connection btwn trails 1 - - 6 3 for better ped/bike conditions - - - 4 1 - - 4 8 comments / thumbs-up; 3 for more ped access 1 - - 4 3 for more ped access 1 - 1 4 1 - - 4 7 for better ped access 1 - - 4 - 1 - 3 4 for warning signage; 4 for sidewalks or bike lane; 3 for off-road route - - 1 3 3 for wider sidewalks; 3 for filling in sidewalk gaps; 3 for connection to BnH - - - 3 - 1 - 3 2 for safe connections for kids - - - 3 4 for sidewalks - - - 3 - - - 2 1 - - 2 6 for more ped access - - - 2 1 - - 2 2 for sidewalks - - - 1 - - - 1 - - - 1 1 - - 1 1 - - 1 2 in support - 1 - 1 3 for sidewalks - - - 1 - - - 0 - - - 0 - - - 0 STOW CONNECTIVITY PLAN 41
You can also read