CAPE PATTON TO SKENES CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY - PREPARED BY WORLD TRAIL PTY LTD FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, LAND, WATER AND ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
CAPE PATTON TO SKENES CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED BY WORLD TRAIL PTY LTD FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, LAND, WATER AND PLANNING FEBUARY 2021
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd World Trail wishes to acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the area, the Eastern Maar, and pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging. We extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and recognise their rich cultures and continuing connection to land and waters. . i
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Disclaimer This document, Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study, has been prepared by World Trail Pty Ltd for the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. This document is the work of World Trail and does not necessarily reflect the final views or opinions of all stakeholders. It has been prepared in accordance with the relevant federal, state and local legislation and current industry best practice. World Trail accepts no liability for any damages or loss incurred as a result of reliance placed upon the report content or for any purpose other than that for which it was intended. Version Control Version Date Author Notes Draft 29/1/2021 G. McHugh Draft 8/2/2021 B. Isaac Incorporating DELWP feedback Draft – Final for 9/2/2021 G. McHugh Final DRAFT report for Endorsement DELWP endorsement Final 15/2/2021 B. Isaac Final report issued ii
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd CONTENTSS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 4 3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................................... 7 4 DESKTOP REVIEW ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 FAIRHAVEN TO SKENES CREEK COASTAL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT .............................. 10 4.2 PRELIMINARY TRAIL ALIGNMENT OPTIONS .......................................................................................... 12 4.2.1 Trail Alignment Option 1 – Between Beach and Road, Conventional Trail ................................ 13 4.2.2 Trail Alignment Option 2 – Between Beach and Road, Engineered Structure ........................... 15 4.2.3 Trail Alignment Option 3 – Beach or Rock Shelf, No Treatment ................................................ 17 4.2.4 Trail Alignment Option 4 – Road Corridor ................................................................................. 19 4.2.5 Trail Alignment Option 5 – Rock Shelf, Engineered Solution ..................................................... 21 4.2.6 Trail Alignment Option 6 – Above Road (Private Property), Conventional Trail ........................ 24 4.3 DESKTOP ALIGNMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 25 5 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................................................26 5.1 COLAC OTWAY SHIRE COUNCIL ............................................................................................................. 27 5.2 DELWP ................................................................................................................................................... 27 5.3 OTWAY COAST COMMITTEE ................................................................................................................. 28 6 FIELDWORK METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................29 7 FINDINGS ...........................................................................................................................................36 7.1 TRAIL SEGMENTS ................................................................................................................................... 37 7.1.1 Other Considerations ................................................................................................................. 42 7.2 ROUTE OPTIONS ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................... 43 7.3 PREFERRED ROUTE OPTIONS ................................................................................................................ 50 7.3.1 Coastal Route with Inland Section Via The Rise and Down Carisbrook Creek (Routes BL and BM) 52 7.3.2 Inland Route Via Carisbrook Creek ............................................................................................ 54 7.3.3 Inland Route Via Smythe’s Creek ............................................................................................... 56 7.4 RECOMMENDED ROUTE OPTION .......................................................................................................... 58 7.5 SHORT WALK LOOP OPTIONS ................................................................................................................ 61 7.5.1 Kennett River Loop .................................................................................................................... 61 7.5.2 Grey River / Cape Patton Loop .................................................................................................. 62 8 NEXT STEPS ........................................................................................................................................66 9 APPENDICES.......................................................................................................................................68 9.1 APPENDIX ONE – CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES ............................................................................ 69 iii
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd In 2019, Ernst Young and World Trail were engaged to undertake a Trails Feasibility Study to explore the potential of a new coastal walking and cycling trail between Fairhaven and Skenes Creek. The Study considered whether the trail would cater to walkers, cyclists or both (shared-use) and identified a trail alignment for the preferred concept design that was in four specific sections: 1. Fairhaven to Lorne; 2. Lorne to Wye River; 3. Wye River to Grey River; 4. Grey River to Skenes Creek. Part of Section 4 (Grey River to Skenes Creek) was identified as presenting significant challenges for trail construction, due to private land holdings above the Great Ocean Road and very steep profiles on the ocean side below the road, specifically in the area near Cape Patton. The cost of Section 4 was estimated between $28.2 million and $50.4 million, with the report stating further investigations would be required from Grey River to Skenes Creek (approximately 16-20km) to better understand the full range of possible trail alignment options. In the second half of 2020, World Trail was engaged by the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) to undertake further investigations for the section of proposed trail between Grey River and Skenes Creek, in particular the area around Cape Patton. Following fieldwork and extensive analysis of fieldwork findings, five alternative route options have been found to be feasible however all have challenges relating to planning and approvals, environmental factors, visitor risk, capital and operational costs and visitor experience. Further planning and design work will be required on the preferred option, as part of the process moving forward into the next stage of the overall project. One option has been put forward as the recommended route option – trail route option BM, one of the coastal route options. The recommended route option starts at Kennett River (as it became the logical starting point) and climbs out of the township on the ridges and spurs looking out over the ocean and then descends towards the small hamlet of Grey River. At Grey River it crosses the Great Ocean Road to the coastal side, heading towards Cape Patton, providing an opportunity to experience unique, stunning views back towards Kennett River and west towards Apollo Bay. It then crosses the Great Ocean Road and heads up the public road ‘The Rise’. At the top of The Rise, the trail passes through a short distance of private property to join the existing Carisbrook Falls walking track within the Great Otway National Park. This track descends to the Carisbrook River, following it back to the car park. At the Carisbrook Falls car park, the trail crosses the Great Ocean Road to return to the ocean side for a stretch of almost 2.5km of beach walking. The trail then moves up onto the ocean side verge of the Great Ocean Road for 3km, to avoid a difficult rock shelf section (pinch points make passing at high tide/swell almost impossible) and cross Smythe’s Creek. Back on the beach for approximately 1.5km, a wide section of sand and rock shelf makes for easy walking. The trail then returns close to the road for a short distance before another short length of beach walking and then passes through a short section of coastal vegetation with the final section of approximately 850m along the beach to Skenes Creek. The recommended trail route option is approximately 20.5km in length and would require approximately 12km of new trail construction. The cost estimate for construction is between $2.8 million and $4.2 million. Riders on cold foggy morning in Canberra 2
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd The main benefits of the recommended trail route option include: • It avoids an impassable rock shelf section at Cape Patton; • It connects with Carisbrook Falls; • The beach walking sections are broken up with other sections, making it a more interesting visitor experience; • It is the second cheapest option; • It provides a more balanced variety of trail settings and treatments than the other coastal route option. In contrast, there are some challenges and complexities with the recommended trail route option that will require further investigation through detailed planning and design. These include: • There is a 3.5km section that passes through private property. If landholder agreements cannot be obtained, this option may become redundant; • There is a 3km section within the road corridor (broken into two separate sections); • Overnight accommodation will be required given the length of the trail. In addition to investigating the feasibility of a trail alignment from Cape Patton to Skenes Creek, World Trail also identified two opportunities for short loop walks, which add value to the overall Great Ocean Road Coastal Trail experience, while also being standalone walking experiences of their own. The first short walk loop option is the Kennett River Loop, approximately 5.5km in length. Starting at the Kennett River township, the loop follows the existing Kennett River Nature Trail upriver for about 1.5km, then onto a new section of trail climbing upwards to Grey River Rd. Crossing over Grey River Rd, the loop returns to Kennett River on the new section of trail that will form part of the Great Ocean Road Coastal Trail. Establishing this loop trail will provide an opportunity for DELWP / GORCAPA to maintain the excitement and energy of the Great Ocean Road Coastal Trail as it progresses through further design, planning and approvals. It will also complement the existing work being undertaken to improve tourism infrastructure in Kennett River through the Geelong City Deal. Excluding the cost of any segments to be constructed as part of the Great Ocean Road Coastal Trail, the Kennett River Loop has a construction cost estimate of between $271,000 and $361,000. Alternatively, if we include the cost of all segments used (for example, under a scenario whereby this loop trail was constructed before the main Great Ocean Road Coastal Trail), the Kennett River Loop has a construction cost estimate of between $794,000 and $1,059,630. The second short walk loop option is the Grey River / Cape Patton Loop, approximately 2.5km. Starting at the Grey River car park, the loop trail follows a beach access track to the beach, follows the beach south for approximately 500m. A proposed new section of trail climbs up off the beach and onto a broad flat, elevated plain at the base of Cape Patton. This plain offers a good opportunity for the development of some type of lookout infrastructure, with breathtaking views of the rugged coastline to the southwest along the base of Cape Patton. A new section of trail then climbs up towards the Great Ocean Road, where it connects to an existing, informal trail, around 900m long, to wind its way through Eucalypt woodlands heading north to connect into the beach access track and back up to the car park where it started. Establishing this loop trail will provide an opportunity for DELWP/GORCAPA to maintain the excitement and energy of the Great Ocean Road Coastal Trail as it progresses through further design, planning and approvals. It will also provide a unique opportunity for people to experience the views along the coastline from a unique vantage point near the base of Cape Patton and spot koalas in a safe and more formal environment. Excluding the cost of any segments to be constructed as part of the Great Ocean Road Coastal Trail, the cost estimate to construct the Grey River / Cape Patton Loop is between $178,000 and $281,000. Alternatively, if we include the cost of all segments used (for example, under a scenario whereby this loop trail was constructed before the main Great Ocean Road Coastal Trail), the Grey River / Cape Patton Loop has a construction cost estimate of between $265,000 and $399,000. 3
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd In 2019, Ernst Young and World Trail were engaged to undertake a Trails Feasibility Study to explore the potential of a new coastal walking and cycling trail between Fairhaven and Skenes Creek. The aims of the feasibility study were to: 1. Consider the potential opportunities and challenges associated with trail development; 2. Identify a feasible route and concept designs to connect new sections of trail between Fairhaven and Skenes Creek with existing and already planned trails; 3. Estimate construction and ongoing maintenance costs associated with different trail options; 4. Assess the economic benefits and feasibility of trails along the coast. The Study considered whether the trail would cater to walkers, cyclists or both (shared-use) and identified a trail alignment for the preferred concept design that was in four specific sections: 5. Fairhaven to Lorne; 6. Lorne to Wye River; 7. Wye River to Grey River; 8. Grey River to Skenes Creek. A key goal of the project was to develop a trail experience that would provide views and experiences that could not be had simply by driving along the Great Ocean Road, compelling people to get out of their cars and into the natural environment and thus spending more time in the region. Part of Section 4 (Grey River to Skenes Creek) was identified as presenting significant challenges for trail construction, due to private land holdings above the Great Ocean Road and very steep profiles on the ocean side below the road, specifically in the area near Cape Patton. The report stated that further investigations would be required from Grey River to Skenes Creek (approximately 16-20km) to better understand the full range of possible trail alignment options. In the second half of 2020, World Trail was engaged by the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) to undertake further investigations for the section of proposed trail between Grey River and Skenes Creek, in particular the area around Cape Patton. Map 1 on the following page, taken from the 2019 Trails Feasibility Study, shows the indicative area to be investigated. Riders on cold foggy morning in Canberra 5
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Map 1. Investigation Study Area - Cape Patton to Skenes Creek 6
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES 7
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd The objectives of this project are to investigate up to five walking trail options and their relative feasibility between Cape Patton and Skenes Creek and provide a detailed report including maps, trail recommendations/treatments and estimated construction costs. Specifically, the report is to include the following: • Suite of detailed maps showing possible route/type/gaps etc.; • Options matrix or similar identifying complexity/experience etc.; • Revised cost estimate for entire section; • Recommendations for next phases of work to inform further design, geotechnical and planning considerations and scope. 8
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 4 DESKTOP REVIEW 9
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 4.1 FAIRHAVEN TO SKENES CREEK COASTAL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT The ‘Fairhaven to Skenes Creek Coastal Trail Feasibility Study’ was completed in November 2019 for DELWP. The report presented a high-level conceptual alignment for the trail, broken down into four specific sections: 1. Fairhaven to Lorne; 2. Lorne to Wye River; 3. Wye River to Grey River; 4. Grey River to Skenes Creek. A key feature of the report was the inclusion of up to five suspension bridges located at strategic points along the trail. These bridges will span across gullies and valleys, potentially offering views down over the Great Ocean Road and out to sea. The trail is proposed to be designed to meet the Australian Walking Track Grading System between Level 2 and 3, meaning that no bushwalking experience is required. The trail may include some steps or a gentle gradient increasing to short steep sections. The users are expected to be predominately visitors to the Great Ocean Road region and can be grouped into three potential categories: 1. Those wanting a short walk (1-2 hours, taking in the spectacular suspension bridges and coastal views); 2. Those willing to walk longer distances (3-6 hours) either a loop or from one town to the next; 3. Those wanting longer walks of 3+ days, these visitors would be more self-sufficient bringing a pack and walk from Fairhaven to Wye River or Kennett River, utilising existing camping grounds, Airbnb or hotel accommodation on the way through. Each section of the trail varies in distance and terrain and will be designed to allow visitors of all ages and abilities an opportunity to experience this unique offering. The trail will be anchored into the existing towns along the way, thus maximising visitation and spending in those locations to the benefit of the local economy. It will connect to existing pathways and trails on the approaches to these towns, maximising the use of existing infrastructure. Some of these existing pathways are wider and flatter, meeting the requirements of universal access and offering some limited opportunities for wheelchair access, generally closer to the towns. The more remote sections of the trail will not be suitable for wheelchair access, having steep gradients, steps and a narrow, uneven surface. In relation to the section of the trail being investigated in this report, the Ernst Young report identified that it would require further investigation: “The route from Grey River to Skenes Creek includes some of the most challenging design and construction elements in the trail. With private property running along almost the entire inland side of the Great Ocean Rd, there is no alternative but to place the trail along the verge of the Great Ocean Rd, down along the coast at sea level, or somewhere in between. This means that this entire 18km section is likely to be comprised of a mix of different treatments possibly including: • Walking trail along the verge/shoulder of Great Ocean Road, with physical barriers to separate pedestrians from vehicles; • Conventional trail construction in locations where there is sufficient space between the road and the coast; • Beach sections requiring no construction; • Intertidal rock shelf sections, potentially requiring extensive engineered structures capable of withstanding high tides and storm surges. 10
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Rock revetment works where the Great Ocean Road passes adjacent to the beach with no vegetation separating the road and the beach. The cost of these revetments used as ‘technical solutions (extreme)’ in the table below and are based on current works along the Great Ocean Road. The table below provides a cost estimate based on a mix of different treatments but should be treated with caution as they are indicative with more investigations required. Without further on- ground investigations to determine the suitability of the different treatments and further design advice and refinement, it is difficult to refine these costs further.” Table 1. Original Cost Estimate for Section 4: Grey River to Skenes Creek CONSTRUCTION QUANTITY UNITS RATE - LOW COST RATE - HIGH COST TREATMENT Existing Trail 7,810 l/m $0.001 $0.00 $20.00 $156,200.00 Upgrades New Trail 4,248 l/m $150.00 $637,200.00 $200.00 $849,600.00 Construction Small Span 32 l/m $800.00 $25,600.00 $1,500.00 $48,000.00 Bridges Technical Solutions 3,616 l/m $5,000.002 $18,080,000.00 $8,000.00 $28,928,000.00 (Extreme) Technical 2,934 l/m $1000.003 $2,934,000.00 $3,000.00 $8,802,000.00 Solutions Cost Estimate $21,676,800.00 $38,783,800.00 Range Contingency $28,179,840.00 $50,418,940.00 Allowance 30% Due to the complexity of this section, and the unknowns in terms of the treatments that would be required to safely construct a trail around the base of Cape Patton, the cost estimate was very high for this section. In fact, the combined cost estimate for Sections 1 – 3 was approximately $15.9 – 23.6M, lower than the overall cost for Section 4 alone. The report presented a number of visitation scenarios, and then used a medium visitation scenario to undertake a cost benefit analysis. Overall, the project benefits outweighed the costs. Subsequent to the completion of the report, in late 2020, the Victorian State Government announced that the project would be funded and would proceed to the next stages of investigation. The funding announcement included funding for Sections 1 – 3 only, as Section 4 was not deemed to be economically feasible at that time (based on the route and cost estimate provided in the 2019 Ernst Young report). 1 Some sections are located along the beach, requiring no construction works. 2 The proposed construction treatments around Cape Patton are unknown at this stage - further technical investigations required. Price based on a sea wall revetment project previously commissioned by DEWLP costing $1,000,000 for a 3m high structure, 160m in length. 3 The proposed construction treatments along this particular section are unknown at this stage, further technical investigation required. 11
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 4.2 PRELIMINARY TRAIL ALIGNMENT OPTIONS Having been involved in the 2019 project with Ernst Young, World Trail personnel already had a good familiarity with the area and issues associated with designing a trail around Cape Patton. In considering the study area at a broad landscape level, the typical landform offers only a handful of distinct settings for a trail to be constructed. These are referred to as ‘Trail Settings’, and are shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1. Indicative Trail Settings A description of the likely trail alignment options, which are a combination of the trail setting and the construction treatment, are outlined in the following pages. They may be further defined and refined during fieldwork as each section of trail is assessed. 12
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 4.2.1 Trail Alignment Option 1 – Between Beach and Road, Conventional Trail Conventional trail construction in locations where there is sufficient space between the edge of the Great Ocean Road and the coast. Specifically, for this option ‘conventional trail construction’ is defined as trail DESCRIPTION construction not requiring any significant engineered solutions and ‘the coast is defined as the high tide mark or edge of vegetation. Trail surface treatments may include natural surface (i.e. in situ soil), imported gravel, crushed rock or granitic sand, timber or FRP boardwalk etc. TRAIL WIDTH Up to 1m wide tread width FACTORS TO • Primary and secondary dunes – avoid primary dunes; CONSIDER IN THE • Sideslope; FIELD • Proximity of trail alignment to Great Ocean Road. • Relatively low cost; • Aligns with desired type of walking experience; ADVANTAGES • Provides opportunities for variety, based on vegetation, aspect, soils; • Natural feel. DISADVANTAGES • Vegetation removal required. Royal Coast Track, Bundeena EXAMPLES Marion Coastal Walking Trail, Adelaide 13
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Marion Coastal Walking Trail, Adelaide Curl Curl to Freshwater Beach Coastal Walk, NSW 14
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 4.2.2 Trail Alignment Option 2 – Between Beach and Road, Engineered Structure Engineered structure in locations where there is sufficient space between the edge of the Great Ocean Road and the coast, but where conventional trail is not possible due to excessively steep side slope, rocky substrate, or other reasons. Engineering solutions could include but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION • Engineered retaining walls (above or below trail); • Viewing platforms; • Hand rails; • Rock gabions; • Boardwalks. Up to 1m wide tread width, although greater width may be required in high visitor TRAIL WIDTH traffic areas. • Sideslope. FACTORS TO • Proximity of trail alignment to Great Ocean Road. CONSIDER IN THE • Soil/rock stability (visual). FIELD • Enables construction in locations where conventional trail is not possible; ADVANTAGES • Can potentially enable greater no. of visitors; • Can create a point of difference. • Vegetation removal required; DISADVANTAGES • Lesser connection to nature; • Relatively high cost. EXAMPLES Taroona Coastal Path, Hobart, TAS 15
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Three Capes Track, TAS Flagstaff Hill Walking Track, Port Douglas, QLD Red Arrow Walking Track, Cairns, QLD 16
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 4.2.3 Trail Alignment Option 3 – Beach or Rock Shelf, No Treatment Beach and rock shelf sections requiring no trail construction. DESCRIPTION The natural environment footprint is used, with walkers navigating their way with assistance from appropriately designed and located trail markers. No designated trail width. Dependent on tide and amount of beach/rock shelf available TRAIL WIDTH for walking. • Firmness of the sand; • Slope on beach; FACTORS TO • Rock shelf sections – evenness/un-evenness of rocks; CONSIDER IN THE • Impact of high, low and king tides; FIELD • Impact of storm swell. • No/minimal cost; ADVANTAGES • No/minimal environmental impact; • Natural feel. • Can be arduous; DISADVANTAGES • Can become repetitive; • Some risks associated with access during high tide. EXAMPLES Cape to Cape Track, Western Australia 17
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Hakea Trail, Western Australia Royal Coast Track, Bundeena 18
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 4.2.4 Trail Alignment Option 4 – Road Corridor Walking trail along the verge/shoulder of the Great Ocean Road, with physical barriers to separate pedestrians from vehicles. Trail could be a conventional natural surface trail, a hardened asphalt or concrete surface trail, or could require the creation of some type of engineered structure such DESCRIPTION as a boardwalk if there is insufficient space between road edge and cliff edge. Note also, that while it is assumed that the outer (lower) shoulder of the road is the most likely location for a trail, there may be situations where the inside shoulder could be used. TRAIL WIDTH Up to 1m wide tread width • Width of ‘road verge’; FACTORS TO • Potential for rockfall; CONSIDER IN THE • Width of the road shoulder. FIELD ADVANTAGES • Minimal environmental impact. • Vegetation removal may be required; • Lesser connection to nature; • Relatively high cost; DISADVANTAGES • Complexity of design; • Least enjoyable option for trail users; • Risk of being close to vehicles (partially mitigated by barrier). EXAMPLES Sea Cliff Bridge, Wollongong, NSW 19
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Coastal Walk, Bondi to Coogee, NSW Waterfall Gully Track, SA Typical road/pedestrian separation, WA 20
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 4.2.5 Trail Alignment Option 5 – Rock Shelf, Engineered Solution Rock shelf sections of trail requiring engineering structures capable of withstanding DESCRIPTION high tides and storm surges. TRAIL WIDTH 1 – 3m wide tread width • Height above high-water mark; FACTORS TO • Potential for rock fall from above; CONSIDER IN THE • Substrate for footings; FIELD • Importation of materials during construction phase. • Big ‘wow’ factor – great user experience; ADVANTAGES • Potential opportunity for users to access areas not normally accessible. • Vegetation removal may be required; • Lesser connection to nature; DISADVANTAGES • Likely to be highest cost treatment; • Complexity of design; • Some risks associated with access during high tide. EXAMPLES Jezzine Barracks, Townsville 21
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Jezzine Barracks, Townsville Royal Coast Track, Bundeena The Gobbins, Ireland 22
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd The Gobbins, Ireland The Gobbins, Ireland 23
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 4.2.6 Trail Alignment Option 6 – Above Road (Private Property), Conventional Trail Walking trail along edge of private property on non-coastal side of the Great Ocean DESCRIPTION Road. This may require acquisition of private property or lease/licence arrangement. FACTORS TO • Proximity to cliff edge; CONSIDER IN THE • Road crossings; FIELD • Elevation change – potential for steep climbs/descents. • Potential for great views; • Opportunity for private sector commercial investment; ADVANTAGES • Minimise impacts on coastal areas; • Provides a change of scenery. • Vegetation removal may be required; • Likely to be a high cost treatment (depending on land acquisition strategy); DISADVANTAGES • Complexity of obtaining access; • Requires crossing Great Ocean Road. The Causeway Coastal Walk, Ireland EXAMPLES Great Noosa Trail, Sunshine Coast 24
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 4.3 DESKTOP ALIGNMENTS Prior to commencing fieldwork, a desktop review was undertaken of the entire study area, looking at potential trail alignments and options. The initial alignment used for the Ernst Young report was based on the premise that the trail should remain on the ocean side of the Great Ocean Road as much as possible, either on the beach/rock shelf or traversing the vegetated corridor of land between the road and the beach/rock shelf. This alignment was retained for further investigation during fieldwork to determine whether it was viable. In addition to the initial alignment option, three other broad alignment options were identified for further investigation during fieldwork to determine their viability: • A route through private property from Cape Patton to Carisbrook Creek and then along the coast to Skenes Creek; • An inland route from Kennett River around the northern side of private property, coming down Carisbrook Creek to the coast and then along the coast to Skenes Creek; • An inland route from Kennett River around the northern side of private property, coming down Smythes Creek to the coast and then along the coast to Skenes Creek. In undertaking the desktop review of potential alignment options, it was decided that the study area should be broadened slightly to start at Kennett River, rather than Grey River. The main reason for this was simply that any inland routes would most likely need to depart from the original alignment just after Kennett River, not even reaching Grey River. 25
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 5 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 26
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Key stakeholders were contacted during the desktop review stage to discuss the project and proposed methodology and provide them with an opportunity to share any knowledge or experience relevant to the project. Separate on-line teleconference meetings were held with representatives of the following organisations: • Colac Otway Shire Council (COS); • Otway Coast Committee (OCC); • DELWP. A brief summary of each meeting is provided in the sections below. It is noted that we did not meet with Regional Roads Victoria and Parks Victoria at this stage of the project as it was agreed with DELWP that this would provide greater value at a later stage. 5.1 COLAC OTWAY SHIRE COUNCIL World Trail met with Frank Castles and Chris Baker on 28 October 2020. Key points from the discussion included: • Colac Otway Shire (COS) have been tasked with some key deliverables of the Geelong City Deal, most notably the Improvements in Infrastructure in Kennett River project and the Apollo Bay (Wild Dog Creek) to Skenes Creek Walking Track project; • The walking track between Wild Dog Creek and Skenes Creek will be constructed to all abilities standard; • COS are finding challenges with the numerous planning and constructions permits that are required for the approximately 2km walking track; • In particular, they noted the challenges of planning and constructing a walking track within a narrow coastal vegetation / dune area; • COS are supportive and interested in the project being undertaken by World Trail to investigate the feasibility of a trail alignment between Cape Patton and Skenes Creek. 5.2 DELWP World Trail met with Michael Noelker and Amber Clarey from DELWP’s Barwon South West Land and Built Environment Branch on 29 October 2020. Michael and Amber discussed their experience working with the Marine and Coastal Act 2018 and its subsequent policy and guidelines. These will form a defining role in the detailed planning for a walking track along the coast. Key points from the discussion included: • DELWP are responsible for the implementation of the Marine and Coastal Act 2018, the associated Coastal Marine Policy 2020 and Siting and Design Guidelines for structures on the Victorian Coast; • Michael and Amber’s branch support this work, in particular providing advice on Applications for Consent of Marine and Coastal Crown Land; • They spoke of the challenges facing the Wild Dog Creek to Skenes Creek walking track project; • Michael discussed the positives of seeking to engage with Traditional Owners early in project planning; • Michael and Amber were supportive and interested in the project being undertaken by World Trail to investigate the feasibility of a trail alignment between Cape Patton and Skenes Creek. 27
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 5.3 OTWAY COAST COMMITTEE World Trail met with Anthony Alfirenko, General Manager, Otway Coast Committee on 12 November 2020. Anthony discussed his experience planning and constructing infrastructure on coastal areas along the Otway Coast. Key points from the discussion included: • Tides and swell can be significant along the Otway coast, which can be challenging for infrastructure works; • Maintenance needs to be considered carefully, due to potential weather and climate change impacts; • There will be many interested organisations and other stakeholders in the project; • Otway Coast Committee will be incorporated into Great Ocean Road Coastal and Parks Authority (GORCAPA) from 1 December 2020, which will see some changes in time. It is worth considering if/how this walking trail alignment may be impacted; • Anthony was supportive and interested in the project being undertaken by World Trail to investigate the feasibility of a trail alignment between Cape Patton and Skenes Creek. 28
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 6 FIELDWORK METHODOLOGY 29
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Fieldwork was undertaken in two blocks: • Monday 2nd – Friday 5th November 2020; • Wednesday 2nd – Friday 4th December 2020. The entire coastline from Grey River to Skenes Creek was walked and assessed during these periods. The assessment of rock shelf sections was scheduled to ensure that they were visited and assessed during high tide conditions, to determine the degree of inundation and whether it was still feasible to pass safely at high tide. The first block of fieldwork coincided with fairly typical high tides of around 1.5m, but calm conditions and very low swell. The second block of fieldwork had similar typical high tides of around 1.5m, but a moderately large swell, allowing a good contrast with the first block of fieldwork and the ability to observe some of the key risk areas during higher swell conditions. Any point requiring a particular treatment, representing a significant decision point or visitor risk were photographed and mapped using GPS. The inland routes were looked at using existing roads and trails to access the approximate trail alignment, with the objective of gaining an understanding of the terrain, vegetation and elevation, and thus the overall feasibility of constructing a trail in those locations. No actual ground-truthing (i.e. the process of determining and mapping the exact on-ground trail alignment) was conducted. Where it had been identified that the trail would most likely need to be located on the shoulder/verge of the Great Ocean Road, video footage was captured of those sections by driving along and filming from the car. Figure 2 - Figure 10 on the following pages illustrate various aspects of the study site. 30
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Figure 2. Calm conditions along Great Ocean Road Figure 3. Looking east towards Cape Patton from Sugarloaf 31
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Figure 4. Impassable section below Cape Patton (on a calm day) Figure 5. Intertidal rock shelf below Cape Patton 32
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Figure 6. Carisbrook Creek outlet to ocean Figure 7. Looking west towards Carisbrook Creek – note rock/boulder field 33
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Figure 8. Broad rock shelves like this are fairly common and ideal walking in good conditions Figure 9. Rock/boulder strewn beach near Cape Patton 34
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Figure 10. View of Carisbrook Falls from viewing platform 35
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 7 FINDINGS 36
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 7.1 TRAIL SEGMENTS Twenty-eight trail segments were created during the fieldwork (see Map 2 on the next page). Trail segments varied in length from 108m to 19.4km and were each assigned a segment number, trail setting and treatment (see Table 2). Note that segment numbering is largely sequential (in the east to west direction), but some segments were identified later and so have segment numbers that are not sequential. Table 2. Trail Segment Settings and Treatments TRAIL SEGMENT SETTINGS TRAIL SEGMENT TREATMENTS Between Beach and Road Conventional Trail Beach Engineered Structure Between Beach and Road No Treatment Road Corridor Other Above Road (Private Property) Other Each segment is defined by their setting, or treatment, or by a branching of route options. For example, where the setting changes from the beach to the road corridor, a segment would end, and a new segment would start. Similarly, wherever an alternate alignment option was available, a segment would end, and a new segment/s would start. Note that there are three segments shown in the map (38, 39 and 40) that don’t form part of the three main route options. They were included in our fieldwork as potential additional loop walk options at Kennett River and Grey River/Cape Patton. These are included in Map 2 for contextual purposes only. 37
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Map 2. Kennett River to Skenes Creek Trail Segments 38
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Each trail segment was scored to allow relative comparison of the eventual trail route options. A scoring framework was developed using six criteria: • Visitor Experience; • Visitor Risk; • Capital Cost; • Operational Cost; • Environmental Impacts; • Planning and Approvals. Each trail segment was given a score from 1 to 5 for each criterion, with higher scores representing the more attractive option, and lower scores representing less attractive options. Table 3 below provides further detail of the six criteria and scoring. Table 3. Trail Segment Scoring Criteria SCORING INFORMATION Criteria Score = 1 Score = 5 Visitor Experience Indicates a poor visitor experience Indicates an outstanding visitor experience Visitor Risk Indicates high risk for visitors Indicates low risk for visitors Capital Cost Indicates high capital cost Indicates low capital cost Operational Cost Indicates high ongoing operational Indicates low ongoing operational cost cost Environmental Impacts Indicates high environmental impact Indicates low environmental impact Planning and Approvals Indicates a complex and challenging Indicates a simple and planning/approval process straightforward planning/approval process A number of assumptions were made during scoring of each trail segment. These are detailed in Table 4 below and should be considered when reviewing the trail segment scoring information in Table 4. Table 4. Scoring Assumptions ASSUMPTIONS 1. Where a rock shelf section was impassable or close to impassable at high tide or was deemed to be regularly inundated by waves, it scored 1 for Visitor Risk. 2. Sections with a considerable length of boulder scrambling or signs of erosion or instability on the cliff above scored 2 for Visitor Risk. 3. Sections going through a setting of National Park scored lower for Planning and Approvals. 4. Sections of new trail going through coastal vegetation scored 1 or 2 for Planning and Approvals. 5. Beach and Rock Shelf sections that require no treatment scored highest for Operational Cost and Capital Cost. 6. Beach sections generally scored a 2 for Visitor Experience on the basis that they can be hot, have no shade, and are very exposed. Each segment was scored using the scoring system and assumptions outlined above. The resulting scores are shown in Table 5 on the following pages. 39
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd Table 5. Trail Segments TRAIL SEGMENTS SCORING Planning Segment Length Visitor Operational Environmen Overall Setting Treatment Notes Visitor Risk Capital Cost and No. (m) Experience Cost tal Impacts Score Approvals Between Beach Conventional From Kennett River up toward Grey River 1. 2679 3.5 3 3 3 3 2 17.5 and Road Trail Road, through Great Otway NP. From Grey River Road down toward Conventional 2. 2236 Other Great Ocean Road, mostly through Great 3 3 3 3 3 2 17 Trail Otway NP. Majority of trail requires no treatment, 3. 479 Rock Shelf No Treatment but some sections will require significant 2 4 5 5 4 3 23 engineered solution. Majority of trail requires no treatment, Engineered 4. 3262 Rock Shelf but some sections will require significant 5 1 1 2 2 1 12 Structure engineered solution. 5. 409 Beach No Treatment Short section of easy beach walking. 2 4 5 5 4 3 23 6. 1907 Beach No Treatment Section of relatively easy beach walking. 2 4 5 5 4 3 23 Between Beach Conventional Alternative route through vegetation to 7. 539 3 3 3 3 2 1 15 and Road Trail meet existing informal trail Existing hand-built trail, possibly illegal. Leading from carpark through grass and Between Beach Conventional 8. 467 tea tree toward Sugarloaf Creek 3 3 4 3 2 1 16 and Road Trail (handmade bridge across creek), toward accommodation across the GOR. Alternative route through vegetation, Between Beach Conventional 9. 945 connecting with existing informal trail on 3 3 3 3 2 1 15 and Road Trail other side of Sugarloaf Creek. 10. 686 Beach No Treatment Short section of easy beach walking. 2 3 4 4 3 3 19 Pinch point will make passing difficult at Engineered 11. 1883 Rock Shelf high tide/swell. Majority of trail requires 3 1 3 3 2 1 13 Structure no treatment. Many locations have sufficient space behind guardrail for a conventional trail, 12. 1881 Road Corridor Other but some areas will require engineering 2 3 2 2 4 3 16 solutions (e.g., retaining walls) to provide a wide platform for the trail. Smythe's Creek toward Skenes Creek, ending at rock revetment. Mostly Engineered 13. 1152 Rock Shelf passable at high tide. Majority of trail 3 1 3 3 2 1 13 Structure requires no treatment, but some sections will require engineered solution. 40
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd TRAIL SEGMENTS SCORING Planning Segment Length Visitor Operational Environmen Overall Setting Treatment Notes Visitor Risk Capital Cost and No. (m) Experience Cost tal Impacts Score Approvals Most of this section has sufficient space Conventional 14. 1229 Road Corridor behind the guardrail, but some areas will 2 3 2 2 4 3 16 Trail require engineering solutions. 15. 1509 Beach No Treatment Short section of easy beach walking. 2 4 5 5 4 3 23 Beach section. Difficult at high tide due Engineered 16. 737 Beach to boulders. Engineered solution 2 1 3 3 2 1 12 Structure required. Most areas have sufficient space behind Conventional 17. 753 Road Corridor guardrail, but some areas will require an 2 3 2 2 4 3 16 Trail engineered solution (e.g. retaining wall). 18. 554 Beach No Treatment Short section of easy beach walking. 2 4 5 5 4 3 23 Majority of trail requires no treatment; Engineered 19. 887 Rock Shelf some sections will require engineered 3 1 3 3 2 1 13 Structure solution. Between Beach Conventional Alternative route through vegetation, 20. 872 3 3 3 3 2 1 15 and Road Trail connecting car park to stairs. Segment between Kookaburra Cottages 21. 842 Beach No Treatment 2 4 5 5 4 3 23 and Skenes Creek. Conventional Inland route from Grey River Road and 22. 5164 Other 3.5 3 3 3 3 2 17.5 Trail back down Carisbrook Creek to GOR. Conventional From junction of trail 2 and trail 4 down 23. 6188 Other 3.5 3 3 3 3 2 17.5 Trail to Carisbrook Creek. Conventional 24. 19400 Other Inland round through Great Otway NP 4 3 3 3 3 2 18 Trail Between Beach Conventional 25. 108 Existing beach access trail. 3 3 5 3 4 5 23 and Road Trail Existing informal trail coming off beach Between Beach Conventional 26. 863 access track near Grey River, heading up 3 2 3 3 3 3 17 and Road Trail toward GOR. Above Road The Rise (public road section), across Conventional 27. 3493 (Private private land towards Carisbrook Falls 3 3 2 3 3 2 16 Trail Property) walking track. Existing trail to Carisbrook Falls lookout. 28. 459 Other No Treatment Old trail appears to continue but has 4 3 4 3 4 4 22 been closed. 41
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 7.1.1 Other Considerations The scoring system used above is useful to make relative comparisons of the 28 trail segments, focussing on six broad criteria. The system can however, ‘hide’ some key considerations that were found to be valuable. These include: • Trail length and type of trail and how that would likely impact on the visitor experience. For example, most people would not enjoy extended sections of beach walking as it can be exposed to the elements, tiring on legs and can become monotonous. Similarly, extended sections of deep forest can impact on the visitor experience as it can have less opportunities for longer views, colder/darker, hard going on legs and become monotonous; • Any treatment that involves an engineered structure would likely increase the capital cost of constructing that trail segment significantly. It may also contribute to environmental impacts by the type of construction methods required and would likely result in significant planning and approvals needing to be sought. These factors can add complexity to a large project; • Operational cost was discussed throughout our stakeholder engagement and through our experience in the trail industry we understand that this is an area often overlooked during trail planning. We believe it is important to highlight that maintenance of trails in coastal areas can require regular attention due to tidal events and may incur additional operational costs. This was considered when scoring trail segments closer to the coast; • There are a suite of planning components and approvals that will need to be sought to progress the preferred trail route option. When scoring trail segments, we considered the most notable, high level of these – e.g., Marine and Coastal Act, National Parks Act, Crown Land Act, engagement with stakeholders and Traditional Owners. There are also considerations not included in the scoring system, but worth discussing as they become important when evaluating trail route options. These include: • Are there any existing or potential accommodation options available? What is an acceptable distance (considering trail setting and treatment) to be walked in one day? • Where a trail segment passes through private property, it will only be a viable option if landholder agreements can be approved; • Does the trail route option provide any points of difference when incorporated into the remaining 80km of Great Ocean Road Coastal Trail? • The Great Ocean Road Coastal Trail has a goal of being a Class 2/3 walking trail. Will the combination of trail segments provide for this and maximise the visitor experience? 42
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd 7.2 ROUTE OPTIONS ANALYSIS With all the trail segments mapped, numbered and scored, the next step was to combine the various different segments to determine the number of unique route combinations. In total, there were 104 unique combinations of segments, or routes that could be created. These are shown in Table 6 below with each unique route option given its own letter designation for identification purposes. Table 6. Route Options Matrix ROUTE TRAIL SEGMENT OPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COASTAL ROUTE AROUND CAPE PATTON A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF COASTAL ROUTE WITH INLAND SECTION UP THE RISE AND DOWN CARISBROOK CREEK AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV AX AY AZ BA 43
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd ROUTE TRAIL SEGMENT OPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BB BC BD BE BF BG BH BI BJ BK BL BM INLAND ROUTE TO CARISBROOK CREEK BN BO BP BQ BR BS BT BU BV BW BX BY BZ CA CB CC CD CE CF CG CH CI CJ CK CL CM CN CO CP CQ CR CS INLAND ROUTE TO SMYTHES CREEK CT CU CV CW CX CY CZ DA 44
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd The next step in the process was to remove any segments that were deemed to have an unacceptable risk profile, which was defined as any segment that scored a 1 for Visitor Risk. Five segments scored 1 for Visitor Risk – segments 4, 11, 13, 16 and 19. The rationale behind this decision was that any segment that scored 1 for Visitor Risk is “impassable or close to impassable at high tide or was deemed to be regularly inundated by waves,” which ultimately means that visitor’s lives could be at risk. This was determined to be an unacceptable risk, which couldn’t be managed or ameliorated without significant cost and modification to the natural environment. Table 7 below shows the 104 route options, but with the five segments that scored 1 for Visitor Risk highlighted. Table 7. Route Options Matrix with Segments Ruled Out ROUTE TRAIL SEGMENT OPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COASTAL ROUTE AROUND CAPE PATTON A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF COASTAL ROUTE WITH INLAND SECTION UP THE RISE AND DOWN CARISBROOK CREEK AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU 45
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd ROUTE TRAIL SEGMENT OPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AV AX AY AZ BA BB BC BD BE BF BG BH BI BJ BK BL BM INLAND ROUTE TO CARISBROOK CREEK BN BO BP BQ BR BS BT BU BV BW BX BY BZ CA CB CC CD CE CF CG CH CI CJ CK CL CM CN CO CP CQ CR CS INLAND ROUTE TO SMYTHES CREEK CT CU CV CW CX CY CZ DA 46
Cape Patton to Skenes Creek Trail Alignment Feasibility Study World Trail Pty Ltd The result of removing these five segments from the overall route options matrix is stark – only five unique route combinations remain, as shown in Table 8 below. Table 8. Preferred Trail Route Options ROUTE TRAIL SEGMENT OPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COASTAL ROUTE WITH INLAND SECTION UP THE RISE AND DOWN CARISBROOK CREEK BL BM INLAND ROUTE TO CARISBROOK CREEK CR CS INLAND ROUTE TO SMYTHES CREEK DA Four of the route combinations shown above (BL and BM, CR and CS) have only one difference between them, being the swap of segment 6 for segments 7,8,9. These segments are described briefly below: • Segment 6 is a 1.9km section of relatively easy beach walking. It is preceded by segment 5, a 409m section of easy beach walking and followed by segment 10, a 686m section of easy beach walking; • Segment 7 is a 539m section of new conventional trail to be constructed between the beach and the road. It provides (along with segments 8 and 9) an alternative route to segment 6 and is preceded by segment 5 and followed by segment 8, an existing informal trail; • Segment 8 is a 467m section of existing informal handbuilt trail that provides (along with segments 7 and 9) an alternative route to segment 6 along the beach. Leading from a roadside carpark, it travels through grass and teatree toward Sugarloaf Creek where a small makeshift bridge has been constructed. It is preceded by segment 7 and followed by segment 9; • Segment 9 is a 945m section of new conventional trail to be constructed between the beach and the road. It provides (along with segments 7 and 8) an alternative route to segment 6. It is preceded by segment 8 and followed by segment 10, an 686m section of easy beach walking. The five preferred trail route options were all scored according to the scoring criteria described previously, as shown in Table 9 below. Table 9. Average Scores for Preferred Trail Route Options TRAIL SEGMENT AVERAGE ROUTE SCORE OPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COASTAL ROUTE WITH INLAND SECTION UP THE RISE AND DOWN CARISBROOK CREEK BL 19.3 BM 18.5 INLAND ROUTE TO CARISBROOK CREEK CR 19.2 CS 18.2 INLAND ROUTE TO SMYTHES CREEK DA 18.8 The highest scoring trail route option was BL, with 19.3. Trail route option BM is very similar, but swaps segment 6 (a beach segment) for segments 7,8,9, resulting in a score of 18.5. The second highest scoring trail route option was CR, with 19.2. Trail route option CS is very similar, but swaps segment 6 (a beach segment) for segments 7,8,9, resulting in a score of 18.2. The third highest scoring trail route option was DA, with 18.8. 47
You can also read