California Regulatory Notice Register
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
California Regulatory Notice Register
REGISTER 2022, NUMBER 19-Z PUBLISHED WEEKLY BY THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW MAY 13, 2022
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
TITLE 2. FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION
Conflict–of–Interest Codes — Notice File Number Z2022–0503–05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 535
AMENDMENT
STATE AGENCY: Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency
TITLE 2. FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION
Complaint Against Commission Members — Notice File Number Z2022–0503–04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 536
TITLE 22. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Family First Prevention Services Act — Notice File Number Z2022–0428–01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537
TITLE 22. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD
Board Hearings and Procedures — Notice File Number Z2022–0502–02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 539
GENERAL PUBLIC INTEREST
FISH AND GAME COMMISSION
Southern California Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541
FISH AND GAME COMMISSION
Northern California Summer Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 542
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
Consistency Determination Number 1653–2022–090–001–R1, Fish Creek Fish Passage Project,
Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 552
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
Consistency Determination Request for Santa Ana River Stream Habitat Improvement
Project, Tracking Number 1653–2022–093–001–R6), Riverside County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554
(Continued on next page)
Time-
Dated
MaterialDECISION NOT TO PROCEED DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS The Farm and Home Loan Amendments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554 SUMMARY OF REGULATORY ACTIONS Regulations filed with Secretary of State. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554 The California Regulatory Notice Register is an official state publication of the Office of Administrative Law containing notices of proposed regulatory actions by state regulatory agencies to adopt, amend or repeal regulations contained in the California Code of Regulations. The effective period of a notice of proposed regulatory action by a state agency in the California Regulatory Notice Register shall not exceed one year [Government Code § 11346.4(b)]. It is suggested, therefore, that issues of the California Regulatory Notice Register be retained for a minimum of 18 months. CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER is published weekly by the Office of Administrative Law, 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1250, Sacramento, CA 95814-4339. The Register is printed by Barclays, a subsidiary of West, a Thomson Reuters Business, and is offered by subscription for $205.00 (annual price). To order or make changes to current subscriptions, please call (800) 328−4880. The Register can also be accessed at http://www.oal.ca.gov.
CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
Any interested person may present statements, ar-
PROPOSED ACTION ON guments or comments, in writing to the Executive
Director of the Commission, relative to review of
REGULATIONS the proposed conflict–of–interest code(s). Any writ-
ten comments must be received no later than June 27,
2022. If a public hearing is to be held, oral comments
Information contained in this document is may be presented to the Commission at the hearing.
published as received from agencies and is COST TO LOCAL AGENCIES
not edited by Thomson Reuters.
There shall be no reimbursement for any new or
increased costs to local government which may re-
TITLE 2. FAIR POLITICAL sult from compliance with these codes because these
PRACTICES COMMISSION are not new programs mandated on local agencies by
the codes since the requirements described herein
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Fair Political were mandated by the Political Reform Act of 1974.
Practices Commission, pursuant to the authority vest- Therefore, they are not “costs mandated by the state”
ed in it by Sections 82011, 87303, and 87304 of the as defined in Government Code Section 17514.
Government Code to review proposed conflict–of–
interest codes, will review the proposed/amended EFFECT ON HOUSING
conflict–of–interest codes of the following:
COSTS AND BUSINESSES
CONFLICT–OF–INTEREST CODES Compliance with the codes has no potential effect
on housing costs or on private persons, businesses or
small businesses.
AMENDMENT
AUTHORITY
STATE AGENCY: Business, Consumer Services
and Housing Agency Government Code Sections 82011, 87303 and 87304
A written comment period has been established provide that the Fair Political Practices Commission
commencing on May 13, 2022 and closing on June as the code–reviewing body for the above conflict–of–
27, 2022. Written comments should be directed to the interest codes shall approve codes as submitted, revise
Fair Political Practices Commission, Attention Daniel the proposed code and approve it as revised, or return
Vo, 1102 Q Street, Suite 3000, Sacramento, California the proposed code for revision and re–submission.
95811.
At the end of the 45–day comment period, the pro- REFERENCE
posed conflict–of–interest code(s) will be submitted to
the Commission’s Executive Director for his review, Government Code Sections 87300 and 87306 pro-
unless any interested person or his or her duly autho- vide that agencies shall adopt and promulgate conflict–
rized representative requests, no later than 15 days pri- of–interest codes pursuant to the Political Reform Act
or to the close of the written comment period, a public and amend their codes when change is necessitated by
hearing before the full Commission. If a public hear- changed circumstances.
ing is requested, the proposed code(s) will be submit-
ted to the Commission for review. CONTACT
The Executive Director of the Commission Any inquiries concerning the proposed conflict–of–
will review the above–referenced conflict–of– interest code(s) should be made to Amanda Apostol,
interest code(s), proposed pursuant to Government Fair Political Practices Commission, 1102 Q Street,
Code Section 87300, which designate, pursuant to Suite 3000, Sacramento, California 95811, telephone
Government Code Section 87302, employees who (916) 322–5660.
must disclose certain investments, interests in real
property and income. AVAILABILITY OF PROPOSED
The Executive Director of the Commission, upon CONFLICT–OF–INTEREST CODES
his or its own motion or at the request of any interested
person, will approve, or revise and approve, or return Copies of the proposed conflict–of–interest codes
the proposed code(s) to the agency for revision and re– may be obtained from the Commission offices or
submission within 60 days without further notice. the respective agency. Requests for copies from the
535CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
Commission should be made to Amanda Apostol, Fair civil court actions involving violations of the Act, the
Political Practices Commission, 1102 Q Street, Suite Commission shares jurisdiction with local district at-
3000, Sacramento, California 95811, telephone (916) torneys, city attorneys, and the Office of the Attorney
322–5660. General (the AG’s Office), depending on who is alleged
to have violated the Act. Specifically, the Commission
is the “civil prosecutor” for cases involving any state
TITLE 2. FAIR POLITICAL agency, except itself. The AG’s Office is the civil pros-
PRACTICES COMMISSION ecutor for alleged violations of the Act involving the
Commission, including its members.6 The AG’s Office
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Fair Political
also has jurisdiction over criminal violations of the
Practices Commission (the Commission), under the au-
Act for state agencies, including the Commission.7
thority vested in it under the Political Reform Act (the
Act)1 by Section 83112 of the Government Code, pro- While the Act does not explicitly provide for refer-
poses to adopt, amend, or repeal regulations in Title 2, ral of complaints to other agencies, such authority ex-
Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. The ists as the result of the concurrent jurisdiction provid-
Commission will consider the proposed regulation at ed under the Act. The Enforcement Division occasion-
a public hearing on or after June 16, 2022 at the offic- ally refers complaints to other agencies in instances
es of the Fair Political Practices Commission, 1102 Q when doing so would be preferable for obtaining ad-
Street, Suite 3000, Sacramento, California, commenc- equate resolution of the complaint, or where the other
ing at approximately 10:00 a.m. Written comments agency expresses an interest in pursuing a particular
must be received at the Commission offices no later complaint.
than 5:00 p.m. on June 14, 2022. In instances where a current Commission mem-
ber is accused of violating the Act, the AG’s Office is
BACKGROUND/OVERVIEW the appropriate agency to investigate the allegations
and pursue any appropriate legal action. While the
Members of the Commission, including the Chair, Commission’s Enforcement Division has authority to
are subject to the Act like all other state and local of- pursue administrative action in such an instance, prac-
ficers, and persons participating in regulated political tical and ethical concerns dictate that the best course
activity. As a result, Commission members can be ac- of action is for the Enforcement Division to refer the
cused of violating the Act. Such allegations should be matter to the AG’s Office.
investigated and can result in legal action if there is
reason to believe a violation occurred. REGULATORY ACTION
A stated purpose of the Act is that “(a)dequate en-
Adopt 2 Cal. Code Regs. Section 18315 directing
forcement mechanisms should be provided to public
the Commission’s Chief of Enforcement to refer com-
officials and private citizens in order that this title will
plaints alleging a current Commission member violat-
be vigorously enforced.”2 Consequently, the Act pro-
ed the Act to the AG’s Office, provide notice of the re-
vides multiple avenues for enforcement of its provi-
ferral to the complainant and Commissioner named in
sions. Nearly all violations of the Act can be pursued
the complaint, and provide notice of the complaint to
through administrative or civil action.3 Further, if a
the Commission’s Chair or Vice Chair.
person knowingly or willfully violates the Act, they
can also be subject to criminal prosecution.4
SCOPE
The Commission’s Enforcement Division investi-
gates and prosecutes most cases involving alleged vio- The Commission may adopt the language noticed
lations of the Act via administrative proceedings. The herein, or it may choose new language to implement
Commission has sole authority to bring administra- its decisions concerning the issue identified above or
tive proceedings for alleged violations of the Act.5 For any related issue.
1
The Political Reform Act is contained in Government Code FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
Sections 81000 through 91014. All statutory references are to the
Government Code, unless otherwise indicated. The regulations
of the Fair Political Practices Commission are contained in Sec- Fiscal Impact on Local Government. None.
tions 18110 through 18997 of Title 2 of the California Code of
Regulations. All regulatory references are to Title 2, Division 6 of Fiscal Impact on State Government. None.
the California Code of Regulations, unless otherwise indicated. Fiscal Impact on Federal Funding of State
2
Section 81002(f). Programs. None.
3
Sections 89520, 89521, 91004, 91005, and 91005.5.
4
Section 91000. 6
Sections 91001(b).
5
Sections 83116 and 83116.5. 7
Section 91001(a).
536CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
AUTHORITY Public–Hearing–Information). Additionally, all the
information which CDSS considered as the basis for
Government Code section 83112 provides that these proposed regulations (i.e., rulemaking file) is
the Fair Political Practices Commission may adopt, available for public reading at the address listed be-
amend, and rescind rules and regulations to carry out low. Following the public notice period, copies of the
the purposes and provisions of the Act. Final Statement of Reasons will also be available at
the following address:
REFERENCE
CONTACT
Government Code sections 83115, 91001, 91004,
91005, and 91005.5.
California Department of Social Services
CONTACT Office of Regulations Development
744 P Street, MS 8–4–192
Any inquiries should be made to Dave Bainbridge, Sacramento, CA 95814
Fair Political Practices Commission, 1102 Q Street, Tel: (916) 657–2586, Fax: (916) 654–3286
Suite 3000, Sacramento, CA 95811; telephone (916) Email: ord@dss.ca.gov
322–5660; dbainbridge@fppc.ca.gov. Proposed regu- CDSS has not scheduled a public hearing on this
latory language can be accessed at http://www.fppc. proposed action. However, CDSS will hold a public
ca.gov/the–law/fppc–regulations/proposed–regula- hearing if it receives a written request for a public
tions–and–notices.html. hearing from any interested person, or his or her au-
thorized representative, no later than 15 days before
TITLE 22. DEPARTMENT OF the close of the written comment period. Any request
should be made to the contact information provided
SOCIAL SERVICES above.
ORD #0122–01
CHAPTERS
SMALL FAMILY HOMES
Title 22, Division 6, Chapter (Small Family Homes)
California Department of Social Services (CDSS)
hereby gives notice of the proposed regulatory action INFORMATIVE DIGEST/POLICY
described below. Any person interested may present STATEMENT OVERVIEW
statements or arguments relating to the proposed reg-
ulations in writing, e–mail, or by facsimile to the ad- The Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA)
dress, e–mail address, or numbers listed below. All became federal law as part of the Bipartisan Budget
comments must be received by June 28th, 2022. Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–123) and made signifi-
Following the close of the public notice, CDSS cant changes to foster care funding, including limiting
may thereafter adopt the proposals substantially as IV–E funding to specified congregate care settings,
described below or may modify the proposals if the including Qualified Residential Treatment Programs
modifications are sufficiently related to the original (QRTPs). QRTPs are nationally accredited facili-
text. Except for nonsubstantive, technical, or gram- ties that serve youth with clinical treatment needs.
matical changes, the full text of any modified propos- In California, Short–Term Residential Therapeutic
al will be available for 15 days prior to its adoption to Programs (STRTPs) already had many of the traits
all persons who submit written comments during the required of QRTPs prior to passage of FFPSA and
public comment period and all persons who request STRTP licensing standards became fully compliant
notification on this proposal. Please address requests with FFPSA QRTP requirements on October 1, 2021.
for regulations as modified to the agency contact iden- The FFPSA also directed the United States
tified below. Department of Health and Human Services,
Copies of the express terms of the proposed regu- Administration for Children and Families (ACF) to is-
lations and the Initial Statement of Reasons are avail- sue model licensing standards for foster family homes.
able from the office listed below. This notice, the Initial States were subsequently required to provide ACF
Statement of Reasons and the text of the proposed regula- with detailed information about whether their state
tions are available on CDSS’ public hearing page (http:// foster family home licensing standards (resource fam-
www.cdss.ca.gov/inforesources/Letters–Regulations/ ily approval standards in California) were consistent
Legislation–and–Regulations/CDSS–Regulation– with the model licensing standards identified by ACF,
Changes–In–Process–and–Completed–Regulations/ and if not, why not.
537CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
Small Family Homes (SFH) are defined in Health Carbon Monoxide Detectors
and Safety Code section 1502 as residential facilities Changes to Section 83087(e) amend current require-
in a licensee’s family residence, licensed in California ments for carbon monoxide detectors, clarifying that
to provide care for six or fewer children who have men- they must be functioning and be placed on each level
tal health, developmental or physical disabilities re- of occupancy and near all sleeping areas of the home,
quiring special care and supervision. They are subject and be audible in each bedroom.
to their own regulation scheme rather than Resource
Family Approval standards because they serve this Smoke Alarms
specialized population, but they are home–based set- A new subsection is added to Section 83087 stat-
tings, rather than congregate care facilities. ing that every small family home must have one or
While STRTPs are intended for limited stays to sta- more functioning smoke alarms as required in the
bilize children with acute mental health issues, and California Fire Code.
resource families are caregivers who provide out–
of–home care for children in foster care, small fam- Fire Extinguishers
ily homes are generally long–term, often permanent A new subsection is added to Section 83088 stating
homes for youth with chronic health care needs. In that a small family home shall have at least one oper-
light of the changes that FFPSA made to federal IV–E ational fire extinguisher as required by the California
funding, it became necessary to make clear to ACF Fire Code.
that SFHs are not congregate care facilities subject
to QRTP standards, but rather a type of foster family Forms Incorporated by Reference
home. Since they are not resource families, this subse- Small Family Home Risk Assessment–Confidential
quently necessitated submitting a comparison to ACF (LIC XX (x/22) (CONFIDENTIAL) [draft to be final-
of SFH regulations to the model licensing standards, ized prior to completion of rulemaking process]
similar to what was done for resource families.
In the course of preparing the comparison for ACF, COST ESTIMATE
the Department identified several instances where spe-
cific health and safety standards required of resource
families were higher than those required of small fam- 1. Costs or Savings to State Agencies: None.
ily homes or absent in the SFH regulations. The SFH 2. Costs to Local Agencies or School Districts
regulations thus require amendments for consistency Which Must Be Reimbursed in Accordance with
with health and safety requirements for resource fam- Government Code Sections 17500–17630: None.
ilies, which has been communicated to ACF for the
purpose of maintaining Title IV–E funding for SFHs. 3. Nondiscretionary Costs or Savings to Local
CDSS considered other possible related regulations Agencies: None.
in this area, and we found that these are the only reg- 4. Federal Funding to State Agencies: None.
ulations dealing with licensing family residence, that
provides 24–hour care for six or fewer foster children
LOCAL MANDATE STATEMENT
who have mental disorders or developmental or phys-
ical disabilities and who require special care and su-
pervision. CDSS finds that these proposed regula- These regulations do not impose a mandate on lo-
tions are compatible and consistent with existing state cal agencies or school districts. There are no state–
regulations. mandated local costs in these regulations which re-
In order to conform the health and safety require- quire State reimbursement under Section 17500 et seq.
ments of small family home regulations to those re- of the Government Code.
quired of resource families, the Department is propos-
ing the following amendments: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE
Risk Assessment ECONOMIC IMPACT ON BUSINESS
Section 83018 is amended to add a requirement that
prospective SFH licensees include in their application The CDSS has made an initial determination that
information sufficient to allow the licensing agency to the proposed action will not have a significant, state-
conduct a risk assessment of the applicant, including wide adverse economic impact directly affecting busi-
past and current alcohol and substance use and abuse nesses, including the ability of California businesses
history; abuse, neglect and domestic violence histo- to compete with businesses in other states. This deter-
ry and; past and current physical and mental health. mination was made based on the fact that these regu-
A definition of “risk assessment” is added to Section lations largely clarify existing health and safety stan-
83001 for clarity. dards for Small Family Homes in California.
538CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL COST identified and brought to the attention of the agency
IMPACT ON PRIVATE PERSONS would be more effective in carrying out the purpose
OR BUSINESSES for which the action is proposed, would be as effective
and less burdensome to affected private persons than
The CDSS is not aware of any cost impacts that a the proposed action, or would be more cost–effective
representative private person or business would nec- to affected private persons and equally effective in im-
essarily incur in reasonable compliance with the pro- plementing the statutory policy or other provision of
posed action. law.
SMALL BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT AUTHORITY AND REFERENCE CITATIONS
These regulations will impact small family homes CDSS adopts these regulations under the authori-
that are operating as small businesses, however, com- ty granted in Health and Safety Code Section 1530.
plying with them will incur little to no costs to these Subject regulations also add references to Title 24,
providers. Chapter 9, Sections 201, 906.1, 907, and 915 of the
California Fire Code.
STATEMENT OF RESULTS OF
ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT CDSS REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING THE
RULEMAKING PROCESS OF THE
CDSS has determined that the adoption of these PROPOSED REGULATION
regulations will neither create nor eliminate jobs in the
State of California nor result in the elimination of ex- Contact Person: Tyler Penn (916) 657–1808
isting businesses or create or expand businesses in the Backup: Oliver Chu (916) 657–3588
State of California. The regulations as amended will
yield the benefit of providing clarity to providers offer-
ing small family homes to their communities and en- TITLE 22. UNEMPLOYMENT
suring consistency of health and safety requirements INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD
between Small Family Homes and Resource Families.
The state’s environment and worker safety is not af- The California Unemployment Insurance Appeals
fected by this regulatory action. Board (CUIAB) proposes to adopt, amend, and repeal
the regulations described below after considering all
STATEMENT OF EFFECT ON comments, objections, and recommendations regard-
HOUSING COSTS ing the proposed action.
CUIAB has not scheduled a public hearing on this
The proposed regulatory action will have no effect proposed action. However, CUIAB will hold a hear-
on housing costs. ing if it receives a written request for a public hearing
from any interested person, or his or her authorized
STATEMENT OF representative, no later than 15 days before the close
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED of the written comment period.
These regulations are being pursued in response to WRITTEN COMMENT PERIOD
changes in federal law. In light of changes that the fed-
eral FFPSA made to IV–E funding of state programs, Any person, or his or her authorized representa-
it was necessary to make clear to the Administration tive, may submit written comments relevant to the
of Children and Families that Small Family Homes proposed regulatory action to CUIAB. The written
are not congregate care facilities. As they are home– comment period closes at 5:00 p.m. on June 28, 2022.
based settings, but not resource families, this subse- CUIAB will consider only written comments received
quently necessitated submitting a comparison to the at CUIAB by that time. Submit comments as follows:
Administration of Children and Families of SFH reg-
Kim Hickox, Attorney III
ulations to federal model licensing standards and
California Unemployment Insurance
amending SFH regulations where health and safety
Appeals Board
requirements were lower than those required of re-
Office of the Chief Counsel
source families. No alternatives have been presented
2400 Venture Oaks Way, 3rd Floor
to CDSS for review.
Sacramento, California 95833
CDSS must determine that no reasonable alternative
considered by the agency or that has otherwise been or
539CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
By facsimile (FAX) at (916) 263–6842, or by e–mail Cost to any local agency or school district which
to kim.hickox@cuiab.ca.gov. must re reimbursed in accordance with Government
Code sections 17500 through 17630: None.
AUTHORITY AND REFERENCE Other nondiscretionary cost or savings imposed on
local agencies: None.
California Unemployment Insurance Code section Cost or savings in federal funding to the state: None.
411 authorizes CUIAB to adopt these proposed reg- Cost impacts on a representative private person
ulations. The proposed regulations implement, inter- or business: Based on historical averages, charging
pret, and make specific sections 1951, 1953.5, 2712, fees in accordance with Government Code section
and 3262 of the California Unemployment Insurance 69950 for transcripts will result in savings. However,
Code. charging a per–page fee for files may increase costs
for non–claimants. Actual costs may vary from esti-
INFORMATIVE DIGEST/POLICY mates based on the actual size of case files and/or tran-
STATEMENT OVERVIEW scripts requested by parties. Any additional costs or
savings to parties will be solely dependent on the ac-
CUIAB is an independent administrative court tual size of the case file and/or transcript requested by
system established to provide due process for work- a party, which will vary.
ers and employers who seek to appeal Unemployment Significant, statewide adverse economic impact di-
Insurance benefit decisions, Disability Insurance ben- rectly affecting businesses, including the ability of
efit decisions, and Employer Payroll Tax assessments California businesses to compete with businesses in
made by the Employment Development Department. other states: None.
Benefit decisions issued by CUIAB must be issued in Significant effect on housing costs: None.
accordance with the federal timeliness guidelines is- Results of the Economic Impact Analysis/Assessment
sued by the United States Department of Labor, as set CUIAB concludes that the proposed regulato-
forth in Title 20 Code of Federal Regulations section ry action will neither create nor eliminate jobs with-
650.4. The purpose of this proposed rulemaking action in California, will neither create new businesses nor
is to enhance compliance with those timeliness guide- eliminate existing businesses within California, and
lines, and to improve the appeals process to make it will not result in the expansion of businesses currently
convenient and accessible as possible to all parties. doing business within California.
Anticipated Benefits of the Proposed Regulation Benefits of the Proposed Action: The proposed reg-
Changes ulatory action will benefit the public by helping the
These regulation changes will enhance the alterna- scheduling of electronic hearings to be done more
tives by which the parties, their representatives and quickly and flexibly, and by clarifying Board practices
witnesses will be able to access hearings on their ap- and public access to administrative records in cases. It
peals, enable the CUIAB to schedule those hearings will also allow parties more time to file a request for
in the most expeditious manner possible, improve and reinstatement of a withdrawn appeal; request for re-
provide clarity on Board procedures. opening; and a request to vacate a decision.
Evaluation of Inconsistency/Incompatibility with CUIAB has determined there may be cost impacts
Existing State Regulations incurred by a representative private person or business
in reasonable compliance with the proposed regulato-
CUIAB has determined that this proposed rulemak- ry action. Charging a per–page fee for files may in-
ing action is not inconsistent or incompatible with ex- crease costs for non–claimants. Any additional costs
isting regulations. After conducting a review for any to parties will be solely dependent on the actual size
regulations that would relate to or affect this area, of the case file and/or transcript requested by a party,
CUIAB has concluded that these are the only regu- which will vary.
lations that concern the quasi–judicial hearings of Small Business Determination: CUIAB has deter-
CUIAB. mined the proposed regulatory action will save small
businesses money as it reduces the costs of obtaining
DISCLOSURES REGARDING THE transcripts, gives more flexibility to schedule hearings
PROPOSED ACTION electronically thereby reducing travel costs for small
employers, and will allow small employers to electron-
CUIAB has made the following initial ically submit documents, thereby reducing mailing
determinations: costs. However, charging a per–page fee for files may
Mandate on local agencies and school districts: increase costs for small business employers who have
None. a former employee who files a claim. Any addition-
Cost or savings to any state agency: None. al costs or savings to parties will be solely dependent
540CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
on the actual size of the case file and/or transcript re- rulemaking process at its office at the above address.
quested by a party, which will vary. As of the date this notice is published in the Notice
The proposed regulations are not anticipated to have Register, the rulemaking file consists of this notice,
an effect on worker safety or the state’s environment. the proposed text of the regulations, and the initial
statement of reasons. Copies may be obtained by con-
CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES tacting Ms. Hickox at the address or phone number
listed above.
In accordance with Government Code section
11346.5, subdivision (a)(13), CUIAB must determine AVAILABILITY OF CHANGED OR
that no reasonable alternative it considered or that has MODIFIED TEXT
otherwise been identified and brought to the attention
of the agency would be more effective in carrying out Following the written comment period and/or pub-
the purpose for which the action is proposed, or would lic hearing if one is requested, and after considering
be as effective and less burdensome to affected private all timely and relevant comments received, CUIAB
persons than the proposed action, or would be more may thereafter adopt the proposed regulatory actions
cost effective to affected private persons and equally substantially as described in this notice. If CUIAB
effective in implementing the statutory policy or other makes modifications which are sufficiently related to
provisions of law. the originally proposed text, it will make the modified
CUIAB invites interested persons to present state- text (with the changes clearly indicated) available to
ments or arguments with respect to alternatives to the the public for at least 15 days before CUIAB adopts
proposed regulatory action at the scheduled hearing the regulations as revised. Please send requests for
(if any) or during the written comment period. copies of any modified regulations to the attention of
Ms. Hickox at the address indicated above. CUIAB
CONTACT PERSON will accept written comments on the modified regula-
tions for 15 days after the date on which they are made
available.
Kim Hickox, Attorney III
California Unemployment Insurance
AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL
Appeals Board
Office of the Chief Counsel STATEMENT OF REASONS
2400 Venture Oaks Way, 3rd Floor
Upon its completion, copies of the Final Statement
Sacramento, California 95833
of Reasons may be obtained by contacting Ms. Hickox
Email: kim.hickox@cuiab.ca.gov
at the above address.
FAX: 916–263–6842
The back up contact person is: AVAILABILITY OF DOCUMENTS
ON THE INTERNET
Mark Woo–Sam, Chief Counsel
California Unemployment Insurance Copies of the Notice of Proposed Action, the Initial
Appeals Board Statement of Reasons, and the text of the regulations
Office of the Chief Counsel in underline and strikeout format can be accessed
2400 Venture Oaks Way, 3rd Floor through our website at www.cuiab.ca.gov.
Sacramento, California 95833
Email: mark.woo–sam@cuiab.ca.gov
FAX: 916–263–6842 GENERAL PUBLIC INTEREST
Please also direct all requests for copies of the pro-
posed text of the regulations, the initial statement of
reasons, the modified text of the regulations, if any, or FISH AND GAME COMMISSION
other information upon which the rulemaking is based
to Ms. Hickox at the above address. NOTICE OF FINDINGS
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA STEELHEAD
AVAILABILITY OF STATEMENT (ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS)
OF REASONS, TEXT OF PROPOSED
REGULATIONS, AND RULEMAKING FILE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to the
provisions of Section 2074.2 of the Fish and Game
CUIAB will have the entire rulemaking file avail- Code, the California Fish and Game Commission
able for inspection and copying throughout the (Commission or FGC), at its April 20–21, 2022
541CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
meeting, accepted for consideration the petition sub- Game Code, Section 2050 et seq.). (See also California
mitted to list the Southern California steelhead Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 670.1, subsec-
(Oncorhynchus mykiss) as endangered under the tion (i))
California Endangered Species Act. NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN that, at its April 20–21,
2022, meeting, the Commission adopted the following
Pursuant to subdivision (e)(2) of Section 2074.2 findings outlining the reasons for its determination.
of the Fish and Game Code, the Commission deter- I. Background and Procedural History
mined that the amount of information contained in
the petition, when considered in light of the California Petition History
Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (Department) writ- On September 28, 2018, the Friends of the Eel River
ten evaluation report, the comments received, and the submitted a petition to the Commission to list NCSS
remainder of the administrative record, would lead a as endangered under CESA. The Commission re-
reasonable person to conclude there is a substantial viewed the petition for completeness, and pursuant to
possibility the requested listing could occur. Section 2073 of the California Fish and Game Code,
referred the petition to the California Department of
Based on that finding and the acceptance of the peti- Fish and Game (Department) on October 8, 2018 for
tion, the Commission is also providing notice that the evaluation. The Commission gave public notice of re-
Southern California steelhead is a candidate species as ceipt of the petition on October 26, 2018 (California
defined by Section 2068 of the Fish and Game Code. Regulatory Notice Register 2018, Number 43–Z, page
1915). The Department requested a 30–day extension
Within one year of the date of publication of this no- of the 90–day review period which was granted by the
tice of findings, the Department shall submit a writ- Commission at its December 12–13, 2018 meeting.
ten report, pursuant to Section 2074.6 of the Fish and The Department transmitted to the Commission the
Game Code, indicating whether the petitioned action Department’s petition evaluation on January 24, 2019,
is warranted. Copies of the petition, as well as minutes and on February 6, 2019, the Commission formally re-
of the April 20–21, 2022 Commission meeting, are ceived the Department’s petition evaluation.
on file and available for public review from Melissa At its June 2019 meeting, FGC determined that list-
Miller–Henson, Executive Director, California Fish ing may be warranted, and subsequently provided no-
and Game Commission, 715 P Street, 16th floor, tice regarding NCSS’s protected, candidate species
Sacramento, California 95814, phone (916) 653–4899. status (California Regulatory Notice Register 2019,
Number 26–Z, page 954).
Written comments or data related to the petitioned Status Review Overview
action should be directed to the California Department
of Fish and Wildlife, P.O. Box 944209, Sacramento, The Commission’s action designating NCSS as a
CA 94244–2090, Attn: Vanessa Gusman or email candidate species triggered the Department’s pro-
SCSH@wildlife.ca.gov (include “Southern California cess for conducting a status review to inform the
steelhead”) in the subject line. Submission of informa- Commission’s decision on whether to list the species.
tion via email is preferred. At a public meeting in August 2019, the Commission
approved a request for a 6–month extension to com-
FISH AND GAME COMMISSION plete the status review.
On March 29, 2021, the Department transmit-
ted to the Commission the Department’s report
NOTICE OF FINDINGS to the Commission titled California Endangered
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Species Act Status Review for Northern California
SUMMER STEELHEAD Summer Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (status re-
(ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS) view) dated March 11, 2021. On April 14, 2021, the
(4/21/2022) Commission formally received the Department’s sta-
tus review during a public meeting. On June 16, 2021,
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the California
the Commission found that the information contained
Fish and Game Commission (Commission), at a meet-
in the petition to list NCSS and other information in
ing on June 16, 2021, found pursuant to California
the record before the Commission warranted listing
Fish and Game Code (Fish & G. Code) Section 2075.5,
NCSS as an endangered species under CESA.
that the information contained in the petition to list
northern California summer steelhead (Oncorhynchus Species Description
mykiss) (hereinafter “NCSS”) and other information Steelhead
in the record before the Commission, warrants add- Oncorhynchus mykiss is a species of salmonid native
ing NCSS to the list of endangered species under the to cold–water tributaries of the Pacific Ocean in Asia
California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Fish and and North America. Oncorhynchus mykiss includes
542CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
multiple subspecies and several ecotypic forms, in- under California law to designate endangered, threat-
cluding resident and anadromous forms which are ened, and candidate species under CESA. (Cal. Const.,
detailed in the petition and status review. Steelhead art. IV, § 20, subdivision (b); Fish & G. Code, § 2070.)
are the anadromous1 ecotype of Oncorhynchus myki- The CESA listing process for NCSS began in the pres-
ss and are found in Asia and North America, occur- ent case with the petitioners’ submittal of the petition
ring in North American watersheds from Alaska to to the Commission. The regulatory and legal process
Southern California (Light et al. 1989; CDFW 2021). that ensued is described in some detail in the preced-
Steelhead are the most widely present ecotype of all ing section, along with related references to the Fish
the Pacific salmonids, occupying nearly all ocean– and Game Code and controlling regulation. The CESA
connected streams throughout their range (Garza et al. listing process generally is also described in some
2014; CDFW 2021). detail in published appellate case law in California,
There are numerous non–taxonomic units or runs including:
(below the species level), or nontaxa, of Oncorhynchus ● Mountain Lion Foundation v. California Fish and
mykiss in California (Friends of Eel River 2018). The Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105;
most commonly recognized nontaxa are defined by
their migration types (i.e., anadromous or resident) ● California Forestry Association v. California Fish
or their seasonal run timing (i.e., summer or winter), and Game Commission (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th
though Oncorhynchus mykiss cannot be differentiated 1535;
by seasonal run timing or anadromy through classical ● Center for Biological Diversity v. California Fish
taxonomy (Behnke 1972; Wilson et al. 1985; Hayes et and Game Commission (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th
al. 2008). 597;
Steelhead exhibit two seasonal run types; winter, ● Natural Resources Defense Council v. California
also called ocean–maturing or mature migrating, and Fish and Game Commission (1994) 28 Cal.
summer, also called stream–maturing or premature App.4th 1104;
migrating (Withler 1966; CDFW 2021). The names
● Central Coast Forest Association v. California
of these two run types are reflective of the time of
Fish and Game Commission (2017), 2 Cal. 5th
year the fish reenter the estuaries and rivers as adults
594; and
in their upriver migration to reproduce (Busby et al.
1996; Moyle 2002). ● Central Coast Forest Association v. California
The life cycle, physiology, diet, and habitat needs Fish and Game Commission (2018) 18 Cal. App.
are detailed in the petition and status review. 5th 1191.
Northern California Summer Steelhead (NCSS) The “is warranted” determination at issue here stems
NCSS currently occupy fluvial habitat from from Commission obligations established by Fish and
Redwood Creek in northern Humboldt County south Game Code Section 2075.5. Under the provision, the
to the Mattole River, though they do not occur in all Commission is required to make one of two findings
watersheds within this range (CDFW 2021). NCSS are for a candidate species at the end of the CESA listing
categorized by the Department, for purposes of eval- process; namely, whether listing a species is warrant-
uating this potential listing, within a larger Northern ed or is not warranted. Here, with respect to NCSS, the
California steelhead distinct population segment Commission made the finding under Section 2075.5(e)
(DPS) as one of two regional ecotypes: summer and (2) that listing NCSS is warranted.
winter (Pearse et al. 2019; CDFW 2021). The Commission was guided in making its determi-
NCSS are included in two NMFS–defined geo- nations by statutory provisions and other controlling
graphic diversity strata: Northern Coastal and North law. The Fish and Game Code, for example, defines
Mountain Interior; these two diversity strata encom- an endangered species under CESA as “a native spe-
pass 10 historically functionally independent sum- cies or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibi-
mer steelhead populations (NMFS 2016b). The NCSS an, reptile or plant which is in serious danger of be-
range encompasses Redwood Creek, the Mad River, coming extinct throughout all, or a significant por-
and the Mattole River as well as sectors of the Eel tion, of its range due to one or more causes, includ-
River watershed including the Middle Fork Eel River ing loss of habitat, change in habitat, over exploitation,
and the Van Duzen River (Moyle et al. 2017). predation, competition, or disease.” (Fish & G. Code,
II. Statutory and Legal Framework § 2062.) Similarly, the Fish and Game Code defines a
The Commission, as established by the California threatened species under CESA as “a native species or
State Constitution, has exclusive statutory authority subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile
or plant that, although not presently threatened with
1
Anadromous referring to the trait of migrating to the ocean as extinction, is likely to become an endangered species
juveniles, and from the sea up into fresh water to spawn. in the foreseeable future in the absence of the special
543CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
protection and management efforts required by this and recommendation to the Commission as to wheth-
chapter.” (Id., § 2067.) er listing is warranted based on the best available sci-
The Commission also considered Title 14, Section ence. (Fish & G. Code, §§ 2073.4, 2073.5, 2074.4,
670.1, subsection (i)(1)(A), of the California Code of 2074.6; Cal. Code Regs., title 14, § 670.1, subdivisions
Regulations in making its determination regarding (d), (f), (h).)
NCSS. This provision provides, in pertinent part, that III. Factual and Scientific Bases for the
NCSS shall be listed as endangered or threatened un- Commission’s Final Determination
der CESA if the Commission determines that its con-
The factual and scientific bases for the Commission’s
tinued existence is in serious danger or is threatened
determination that designating NCSS as an endan-
by any one or any combination of the following factors:
gered species under CESA is warranted are set forth
1. Present or threatened modification or destruction in detail in the Commission’s record of proceed-
of its habitat; ings, including the petition (Friends of the Eel River
2. Overexploitation; 2018); the Department’s petition evaluation report;
3. Predation; the Department’s status review (CDFW 2021); writ-
4. Competition; ten and oral comments received from members of the
5. Disease; or public, the regulated community, tribal entities, and
the scientific community; and other evidence included
6. Other natural occurrences or human–related in the Commission’s record of proceedings.
activities.
The Commission determines that the continued ex-
Fish and Game Code Section 2070 provides similar istence of NCSS in the State of California is in serious
guidance, providing that the Commission shall add or danger or threatened by one or a combination of the
remove species from the list of endangered and threat- following factors as required by the California Code
ened species under CESA only upon receipt of suffi- of Regulations, Title 14, Section 670.1, subsection (i)
cient scientific information that the action is warrant- (1)(A):
ed. Similarly, CESA provides policy direction not spe-
cific to the Commission per se, indicating that all state 1. Present or threatened modification or destruction
agencies, boards, and commissions shall seek to con- of its habitat;
serve endangered and threatened species and shall uti- 2. Overexploitation;
lize their authority in furtherance of the purposes of 3. Predation;
CESA. (Fish & G. Code, § 2055.) This policy direc-
tion does not compel a particular determination by the 4. Competition;
Commission in the CESA listing context. Nevertheless, 5. Disease; or
“‘[l]aws providing for the conservation of natural re-
sources’ such as the CESA are of great remedial and 6. Other natural occurrences or human–related
public importance and thus should be construed lib- activities.
erally.” (California Forestry Association v. California The Commission also determines that the informa-
Fish and Game Commission, supra, 156 Cal. App.4th tion in the Commission’s record constitutes the best
at pages 1545–1546, citing San Bernardino Valley scientific information available and establishes that
Audubon Society v. City of Moreno Valley (1996) 44 designating NCSS as an endangered species under
Cal.App.4th 593, 601; Fish & G. Code, §§ 2051, 2052.) CESA is warranted. Similarly, the Commission de-
Finally, in considering the six identified fac- termines that NCSS is in serious danger of becom-
tors, CESA and controlling regulations require the ing extinct throughout all, or a significant portion, of
Commission to actively seek and consider related in- its range due to one or more causes, including loss of
put from the public and any interested party. (See, habitat, change in habitat, overexploitation, predation,
e.g., Id., §§ 2071, 2074.4, 2078; Cal. Code Regs., ti- competition, or disease.
tle 14, § 670.1, subdivision (h).) The related notice ob- The items highlighted here and detailed in the fol-
ligations and public hearing opportunities before the lowing section represent only a portion of the com-
Commission are also considerable. (Fish & G. Code, plex issues aired and considered by the Commission
§§ 2073.3, 2074, 2074.2, 2075, 2075.5, 2078; Cal. Code during the CESA listing process for NCSS. Similarly,
Regs., title 14, § 670.1, subdivisions (c), (e), (g), (i); see the issues addressed in these findings represent some,
also Gov. Code, § 11120 et seq.) The referenced obliga- but not all of the evidence, issues, and considerations
tions are in addition to the requirements prescribed for affecting the Commission’s final determination. Other
the Department in the CESA listing process, including issues aired before and considered by the Commission
an initial evaluation of the petition, a related recom- are addressed in detail in the record before the
mendation regarding candidacy, and a review of the Commission, which record is incorporated herein by
candidate species’ status, culminating with a report reference.
544CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
Background Prince et al. 2017; Micheletti et al. 2018; Ford et al.
The Commission has previously listed units at a 2020). Summer and winter steelhead are more close-
lower level than a taxonomic subspecies, in each ly related within individual watersheds (Chilcote et al.
case making a factually–specific determination as to 1980; Waples et al. 2004; Kinziger et al. 2013; Arciniega
whether the unit was appropriate to list under CESA. et al. 2016), and the National Marine Fisheries Service,
In 2004, the Commission listed two evolutionarily accordingly, defines steelhead DPSs largely by geog-
significant units (ESUs) of coho salmon, a decision
raphy (NMFS 2016a; Laird et al. 1995). Nevertheless,
that was upheld in California Forestry Association
v. California Fish and Game Commission. In 2016, the summer and winter steelhead ecotypes do exhib-
the Commission listed an ESU of fisher. In 2020, the it meaningful distinction in run time, and NCSS rep-
Commission listed five clades of the foothill yellow– resents an important diversity component of the spe-
legged frog; a clade, also referred to as a monophylet- cies (Kannry et al. 2020; Ford et al. 2020).
ic group, is a branch on a phylogenetic tree that con-
tains a group of lineages comprised of an ancestor and Summer and winter steelhead interbreed and can
all its descendants. In 2021, the Commission listed an form heterozygous offspring at the GREB 1L/ROCK
ecotype of Chinook salmon — the Upper Klamath– 1 gene region (Prince et al. 2017; Pearse et al. 2019),
Trinity Spring Chinook Salmon — as a threatened and these heterozygous fish are themselves capable
species. of breeding. Heterozygotes may exhibit intermediate
The Commission bases its “is warranted” finding run timing, in the late summer to fall (Pearse et al.
for NCSS most fundamentally on its determination 2019; Greacen 2021). Adult heterozygotes may have
that NCSS qualifies as a “subspecies” as specified in
reduced fitness (Pearse et al. 2019; Micheletti et al.
CESA sections 2062 and 2067. The qualification is
based on the discreteness (when compared to other 2018; Greacen 2021; Papa et al. 2007), and fish that
ecotypes) and significance of NCSS within the state of migrate at that time may face substandard conditions,
California (Fraser 2001; Waples 1991, 1995; Moran et including river temperature (Quinn et al. 2016; Willis
al. 1994; de Guia and Saitoh 2007), coupled with the et al. 2020), although specific NCSS heterozygote per-
threats faced due to relatively small abundances, hab- sistence patterns have yet to be studied in detail. High
itat loss and alteration, overexploitation, and climate heterozygote numbers may be a consequence of rel-
change (Friends of the Eel River 2018; CDFW 2021; atively small populations and disconnection from
Moyle et al. 2008). Construing “subspecies” under upstream habitats (Ford et al. 2020; Greacen 2021).
this framework supports the preservation of important Heterozygotes are likely an important mechanism for
elements of genetic diversity, which has been shown
to support long–term species conservation (Frankham the spread and maintenance of the early migration al-
2005; Frankham 1996; Waples and Lindley 2018) and leles over long time scales (Ford et al. 2020).
is important to fulfill the purpose of CESA of biodi-
versity preservation. The genetically–based run–time discreteness of
Qualification for Listing summer and winter life history variants is meaning-
The petition specifically refers to NCSS as a sub- ful, given that it expresses as the seasonal run in a
species. and argues as to why NCSS should be con- very precise (albeit not perfectly exact) relationship
sidered as such. In making a recommendation to the (Hess et al. 2016; Prince et al. 2017; Micheletti et al.
Commission, the Department deemed that NCSS 2018; Ford et al. 2020). Although the two ecotypes
was best understood as an ecotype of a larger com- are not completely distinct, and future developments
bined Northern California steelhead DPS composed may refine the understanding of how genetics (includ-
of NCSS and Northern California winter steelhead, ing GREB1L) define summer and winter runs (Ford et
and from that the Department concluded that NCSS al. 2020), the two ecotypes are notably separate from
does not itself constitute an independent subspecies. each other as a consequence of genetic, ecological,
Following from this conclusion, the Department rec-
and behavioral factors (e.g., Leider et al. 1984).
ommended against listing NCSS (CDFW 2021). The
Commission must make its own factually–specific de- The summer run–time of NCSS provides a unique,
termination as to whether NCSS qualifies for listing,
adaptive contribution to the species. The run–time dif-
supported by CESA and relevant case law.
Although summer and winter steelhead are not ferentiation allows access to disparate habitat condi-
thought to be separate taxonomic subspecies, the ge- tions during the return migration, conferring a sig-
netics of NCSS distinguishes it from individuals in the nificant adaptive consequence but also makes them
winter ecotype, due to a specific genomic region high- particularly vulnerable to habitat degradation (Ford
ly correlated with migration timing (Hess et al. 2016; et al. 2020; Pearse et al. 2019). The summer–run
545CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2022, VOLUME NUMBER 19-Z
metapopulation2 brings important diversity to the ● present or threatened modification of its habitat;
species that increases its chances of surviving when ● overexploitation;
faced with natural and human–caused environmental
● predation; and
change and environmental stochasticity. This critical
life history variant, shared across watersheds despite ● other natural events or human–related activities
their more distant evolutionary lineage through isola- NCSS is protected as threatened under the federal
tion by distance (Bjorkstedt et al. 2005; Arcinega et Endangered Species Act, as part of the listed Northern
al. 2016; Nielsen 1999; Pearse et al. 2007; Garza et al. California steelhead DPS, which includes NCSS and
2014; Reisenbichler et al. 1992), allows NCSS to per- winter steelhead (50 Code of Fed. Regs. 17.11 and
sist in a unique ecological setting, with dissimilar hab- 223.102).
itat conditions to its winter counterpart, providing the Present or Threatened Modification or Destruction of
(taxonomic) species with population diversity and pro- Habitat
tection against adverse winter conditions. While there is spatial overlap between summer
The best available genetic and evolutionary in- and winter steelhead, which can foster interbreeding,
formation indicates that run–timing genetics (at the NCSS can often be found in higher reaches of water-
GREB1L/ROCK1 locus) manifested from a single sheds in which they occur (Friends of the Eel River
evolutionary event (Prince et al. 2017; Ford et al. 2020). 2018). They specialize in climbing river roughs and
Given its evolutionary history, run–timing in the sum- difficult–to–navigate water stretches, to reach pools
mer is unlikely to evolve again in northern California and other upstream holding areas that are difficult to
steelhead over ecological time scales should it disap- reach for winter steelhead (Kannry et al. 2020). Still,
pear (Ford et al. 2020; Prince et al. 2017). In the case major dams do obstruct passage to historic spawn-
of reestablishment following localized losses, there is ing habitat, including Matthews Dam on the Mad
evidence (from other species) to suggest that reintro- River and Scott Dam on the Eel River (NMFS 2005;
duction through intra–basin migration from another Cooper 2017). The majority of NCSS are in the Eel
source population (Thompson et al. 2020) or through and Mad Rivers combined (NOAA 2016; Greacen
heterozygotes (CDFW 2021) may be possible, but ulti- 2021). Additionally, dams and other large barriers may
mately the likelihood of success is unknown (Greacen prevent anadromy in steelhead populations that have
2021). been isolated above them (Kannry et al. 2020).
Although the relationship between the genetic Particularly problematic natural obstructions may
makeup of a particular fish is very closely related to also isolate significant portions of habitat, particularly
its run timing, some variation is recognized in when during sustained periods of lower flows (CDFW 2021).
it may choose to return from the ocean, even among Even small migration barriers may cause losses to ge-
homozygous individuals (Ford et al. 2020). That is, an netic diversity (Waples et al. 2008).
individual with homozygous summer alleles may re- Because NCSS hold for nine to twelve months be-
turn well into the winter, and vice versa. Ultimately fore spawning, they may be subject to amplified ex-
however, the strong associative link between observed posure to adverse riverine conditions — even tempo-
run timing and NCSS’s genetic composition (Hess rary perturbations. To complete their reproductive cy-
et al. 2016; Prince et al. 2017; Micheletti et al. 2018; cle, they require (1) deep, cold pools with riparian cov-
Ford et al. 2020) suggests an important genetic role in er for holding (Baigún 2000, 2003; Nakamoto 1994;
its inclination to migrate at a particular time of year. High et al. 2006; Nielsen and Lisle 1994), (2) loose
Therefore, the fundamental determinant of whether a gravel and adequate flows for spawning, and (3) suf-
fish is a NCSS is its genetic makeup; only North Coast ficient flows, cool temperatures, and protection from
steelhead that possess homozygous alleles associated predators for rearing (CDFW 2021). Changes in these
with the summer return are classified as NCSS, for the factors have been suspected in the historical alteration
purposes of this CESA listing. of steelhead migration patterns (Robards and Quinn
Based on the foregoing factors, the Commission 2002).
finds NCSS qualifies as a subspecies under CESA. Significant land uses that adversely affect condi-
Threats tions necessary for the NCSS life cycle include wa-
ter use (particularly from noncompliant sites), min-
NCSS is endangered due to:
ing, timber production, deforestation, road construc-
tion and maintenance, livestock grazing, and agricul-
2
The metapopulation framework can be a useful concept to un-
derstand NCSS dynamics because (i) the various NCSS spawning ture (CDFW 2021; Dillis et al. 2019). Effects from ille-
habitats are discrete and are separated by a matrix of unsuitable gal cannabis operations can include both water diver-
habitat; (ii) there is sufficient asynchrony in the population dy- sions and the introduction of pollutants. Flood events
namics of local populations, such that some may persist while
others may not, and (iii) some NCSS stray from their natal popu- (Jowett and Richardson 1989) and unstable geology
lation, linking the disparate populations via dispersers. have also contributed to NCSS habitat loss (Waples et
546You can also read
