Briefing the Department of Water and Sanitation's Gauteng District Implementation Plan - Mr. Trevor Balzer
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
BriefingPRESENTATION
the Department of Water and
TITLE
Sanitation’s Gauteng District
Presented by:
Implementation Plan
Name Surname
Directorate
Presented Date
by:
Mr. Trevor Balzer
Acting Director-General
28 August 2020
Contents
• Purpose………...…………………..…………………...…………………...….……..3
• Part 1: Situational analysis………………………………………………………4-23
• Part 2: Overview of the Gauteng 2020/21 district implementation plan
targets.……………………………………………………………………………24-73
– City of Ekurhuleni
– City of Johannesburg
– City of Tshwane
– Sedibeng District Municipality
– West Rand District Municipality
2
Purpose
To brief the Portfolio Committee on the
Department of Water and Sanitation’s Gauteng
District Implementation plan for 2020/21
3
PART 1: SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROVINCE
4
Provincial overview
GAUTENG
GAUTENG CONTRIBUTES
HAS A TOTAL OF
34,8 %
64 TOWNS & CITIES
TO THE GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
Gauteng Mega Infrastructure Projects
9 PERENNIAL
• Central Development Corridor - COJ RIVERS
• Eastern Development Corridor – City of
Ekurhuleni
• Northern Development Corridor - COT 5%
• Western Corridor – West Rand District OF THE TOWNS RELY
• Southern Corridor – Sedibeng District ON GROUNDWATER
95%
OF THE TOWNS & CITIES RELY
ON SURFACE WATER
MOST TOWNS & CITIES RELY
ON A MIXURE OF BOTH
5
Provincial Population
6
South Africa’s Water Resource
Scarcity
(average annual rainfall & water resource situation)
Rainfall is relatively higher in the
northern and eastern parts of Southern
Africa (viz. DRC, Zambia and
Mozambique)
The drier parts of the region include
Namibia, Botswana and South Africa
Hence, water availability is spatially
skewed (in terms of areal distribution)
Evaporation rates exceed precipitation
mainly due to high temperature
Southern Africa only has 12.25% of the
total water in Africa (i.e. highly arid
region)
Key message: RSA is relatively water scarce under natural
conditions even before factoring human induced impacts into the
equation
South Africa’s water resources
Surface Water Potential Ground Water Potential
Total Runoff = 49 billion m3/year (
Current water resources
mix
Water use per source type at 98% assurance level
Desalination
STORAGE PER PROVINCE
% Storage per Province
ACTUAL
VOLUMES WATER STORAGE PER PROVINCE
Northen Cape
Swaziland Western Cape 0%
Province Storage Lesotho
North West
7% 1% 6%
Western Cape 1,865.7 Eastern Cape 3%
Mpumalanga
6%
Northen Cape 147.3 8%
Limpopo
North West 867.6 5%
Mpumalanga 2,538.6
Limpopo 1,522.0
KZN 4,784.0
Gauteng 128.1 KZN
15%
Free State 15,653.0
Eastern Cape 1,809.6
Gauteng
Lesotho 2,362.6 Free State 0%
49%
Swaziland 333.8
Total 32,012.3
Western Cape Northen Cape North West Mpumalanga Limpopo KZN
Gauteng Free State Eastern Cape Lesotho Swaziland
10Bulk Supply System
The GCR is geographically located on a high plateau far from large rivers
The top of the plateau (Parktown ridge) represents a watershed:
Water that falls to the south of the ridge drains to the Atlantic Ocean
(via the Vaal and Orange Rivers)
Water that falls to the north of the ridge drains to the Indian Ocean (via
the Crocodile and Limpopo Rivers)Bulk Supply System Due to the watershed, the GCR extracts from and impacts on a number of water management areas
Bulk Supply System
83% of the GCR’s water is supplied by a complex system of transfers
through the Integrated Vaal River System (IVRS)
Mohale Dam 22km2
Total Storage Capacity (Lesotho)
0.94 billion m3
Rand Water extraction
points for purification
and distribution to
municipalities
Extraction limit has
been reached until
LHP2 is completed –
est 2026WATER SERVICES AREAS- GAUTENG PROVINCIAL
14FOCUS AREA
Projected Growth in Yield and Demand For IVRS for GP and
Surrounding
Deficit (-) Deficit (-) /Surplus
/Surplus (+); 40
(+); 34
Demands Demands
(estimated (estimated
Availability(integ Availability(integra
requirements); 3 requirements); 3
rated system ted system yield)/
120 600
yield)/ scheme scheme yield; 3
yield ; 3 154 640
2019 2040• GP shows a deficit in GP Groundwater
terms of groundwater
availability – Although
some studies shows that
the dolomitic aquifers in Unabstracted
the GP area have (m3/a); -59 757
209
potential groundwater, Available
(GRA2)(m3/a);
the challenge is the risk 123 658 583
of subsidence which may
occurs should over-
exploitation in these
areas occur.
• At a local scale (low risk Abstracted
areas) investigations on (WARMS)(m3/a);
groundwater 183 415 792
development on
availability may be
successful
17Reconciling Water Requirements &
Availability
• DWS undertakes scenario planning to ensure water security for the
country
• Key outputs of the scenario planning are strategies to reconcile water
requirements and availability for all large integrated systems in the
country as well for localised water resource systems that secure water
for small towns, villages or clusters of settlements.
• Due to the dynamic nature of a water balance for a system,
reconciliation strategies must be continuously reviewed and updated in
a participatory manner. Strategy Steering Committees involving
stakeholders/roleplayers/ interested and affected parties are formed to
oversee this task.
• Reconciliation strategies feeds water security perspectives into national,
provincial and local planning instruments such as the NDP, NWRS, PGDS,
WSDPs and etc.
• Reconciliation Strategies thus underpins water and sanitation master
planning in SA including the Water Sector Infrastructure Investment
Framework which is critical for economic revival and growth.
18Reconciliation Strategy for the Integrated Vaal River System
Water Description of the system and its Strategic Interventions to keep the system in
Resource (WR) supply area balance for a period of at least 25 years
System
Integrated Vaal • Consists of 14 interlinked dams • Eradicate unlawful irrigation, notably in the
River System including Vaal, Bloemhof, upper Vaal river area
Sterkfontein, Grootdraai, Katse, • Implement Water Conservation/Water
and Mohale Dams Demand Management with focus on loss
• Supplies water to: 60% of management (15% must be saved)
economy, 45% of population, • Treat and use effluent, starting with
Mines and industries on Eastern desalination of acid mine water drainage
Mpumalanga Highveld, Bulk of • Implement the next water supply
Eskom’s coal fired power stations, augmentation scheme (Phase 2 of the
Sasol’s coal to liquids plants, Lesotho Highlands Water Project)
Gauteng, North West and Free
State goldfields, Kimberley, Large
irrigation schemes,
• System in currently in deficit due
and needs augmentation
19Water Balance (October 2019)
Re-use (56 million
Desalination for urban use
High with target WC/WDM Unlawful removed m3/a in COT
(from January 2022)
alone)
• High water requirement
3800 Target Scenario • Unlawful removed
High water requirement
• High water requirement
• Unlawful removed Earliest Date for Yield
Water Requirements (million m3/a)
3600 • WC/WDM savings Replacement (2030)
• Re-use
Short term availability
3400
due to favourable
reservoir volumes
TWP
3200 System
Rand Water Project 1600
Yield
3000 Polihali Dam Yield
2800 Yield increases due to
Polihali Dam
Net Yield desalination of mine water
• Elevated risk of restrictions. (*recalibrate model)
2600
• Violation of risk criteria.
2400
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Elevated risks without WC/WDM savings First transfer from LHWP Phase II – Dec
20 2025State of Dams in Gauteng
Dam River Place Full Suppy % % % Last
Capacity 2020/ Last year
(million m3) 08/24 Week
Bon Accord Apies North of
Pretoria 4.4 104.8 104.8 101.8
Bronkhorstspruit Bronkhor East of
st Spruit Pretoria 57.0 94.6 94.9 82.9
Rietvlei Hennops Centurion
12.3 99.8 99.8 100.9
Roodeplaat Pienaars North-East
of Pretoria 41.2 100.2 100.2 96.5
TOTAL
114.8 99.8 99.9 95.5
21State of the Vaal River System (14 Dams)
Dam River Full Supply Capacity % 2020/08/24 % Last Week % Last
(million m3) year
Bloemhof Vaal 1240.3 96.5 98.2 96.7
Grootdraai Vaal 349.6 79.4 79.9 62.9
Heyshope Assegaai 445.0 73.1 73.5 81.4
Jericho Mpama 59.3 76.8 77.3 62.1
Katse Malibamatso 1519.2 27.7 28.7 18.2
Mohale Senqunyane 857.2 6.2 6.7 33.1
Morgendstond Ngwempisi 100.0 45.5 45.6 42.9
Nooitgedacht Komati 78.4 85.9 86.1 84.5
Sterkfontein Nuwejaarspruit 2617.0 93.9 93.9 92.2
Vaal Vaal 2603.5 38.8 39.6 61.3
Vygeboom Komati 78.1 89.8 90.9 94.9
Westoe Usutu 60.1 32.7 34.3 64.9
Woodstock Tugela 373.3 84.0 94.6 91.6
Zaaihoek Slang 187.7 60.9 62.4 68.5
TOTAL 10 564.9 63.6 65.1 68.2
22Water demand and loss trend
1 800 100%
1 600 15% Water restrictions 12 Aug 2016 to 13 March 2017 90%
System Input Volume (million m³/annum)
80%
1 400
70%
1 200
% Non-revenue Water
60%
1 000
50%
800 38,3%
35,7% 35,9% 34,9% 36,6% 36,2% 35,7% 36,5% 35,8% 40%
34,0% 34,5%
600
26,0% 24,1% 30%
400
Original 20%
200 Target Target
10%
date
- 0%
Jun-07 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11 Jun-12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 Jun-16 Jun-17 Jun-18 Jun-22
Non-Revenue water Billed unmetered Billed metered
Projected SIV without WDM Projected SIV with WDM % Non-revenue waterTotal targeted vs actual savings
Projected %
Projected SIV Projected SIV Actual demand Actual % Savings under or
Year savings
without WDM with WDM (Y) savings over SIV with
ending (X – Z) / X *
(X) kl/annum (Z) kl/annum kl/annum (X - Y) / X * 100 WDM
100
Jun-12 1 355 553 246 1 355 553 246 0.0% 1 350 937 559 0.3% -4 615 687
Jun-13 1 381 188 945 1 328 391 341 3.8% 1 392 562 365 -0.8% 64 171 024
Jun-14 1 407 385 317 1 323 164 904 6.0% 1 420 811 053 -1.0% 97 646 149
Jun-15 1 434 071 521 1 318 268 239 8.1% 1 459 982 952 -1.8% 141 714 713
Jun-16 1 461 309 400 1 316 470 037 9.9% 1 473 100 700 -0.8% 156 630 663
Jun-17 1 488 547 279 1 314 671 835 11.7% 1 392 986 542 6.4% 78 314 707
Jun-18 1 514 433 316 1 302 436 750 14.0% 1 412 547 113 6.7% 110 110 363
Jun-22 1 630 093 995 1 443 086 455 11.5% - - -Jun 2018 summary of targeted vs actual savings
Projected SIV Projected SIV Projected % Actual demand Actual % Savings under
System without WDM with WDM savings (Y) savings or over SIV
(X) kl/annum (Z) kl/annum (X – Z) / X * 100 kl/annum (X - Y) / X * 100 with WDM
City of
605 229 908 479 863 164 20.7% 571 431 260 5.6% 91 568 096
Johannesburg
City of Tshwane 349 583 326 330 230 251 5.5% 322 348 027 7.8% -7 882 224
Ekurhuleni 379 463 253 349 506 688 7.9% 349 769 470 7.8% 262 782
Emfuleni 96 269 814 65 815 785 31.6% 93 254 354 3.1% 27 438 569
Midvaal 15 182 440 13 956 299 8.1% 12 915 967 14.9% -1 040 332
Lesedi 7 044 551 6 698 580 4.9% 6 801 467 3.5% 102 887
Mogale City 30 353 086 28 189 710 7.1% 26 206 995 13.7% -1 982 715
Randfontein 10 197 723 9 783 305 4.1% 9 703 885 4.8% -79 420
Westonaria 7 400 033 6 405 920 13.4% 6 008 615 18.8% -397 304
Merafong City 13 709 181 11 987 048 12.6% 14 107 073 -2.9% 2 120 025
Total 1 514 433 316 1 302 436 750 14.0% 1 412 547 113 6.7% 110 110 3632018 IVRS Water balance
64.1%
Billed metered = 778,720
Billed authorised = 905,968 Revenue water = 905,968
Authorised consumption =
1020,322
System Input Volume =
1412,547
Billed unmetered = 127,248
284 l/c/d
Unbilled authorised = 114,354 Unbilled unmetered = 111,004
Apparent losses = 108,254 Apparent losses = 108,254
Non-revenue water = 506,579
Water losses = 392,225
Real Losses = 283,971 Real Losses = 283,971
27.8% 35.9%litres/capita/day trend
16 000 000 350
329
329
323
14 000 000 300
309
307
307
306
306
305
300
284
284
12 000 000
271
250
Litres / capita / day
10 000 000
Population
200
14 377 777
8 000 000
13 426 497
13 200 182
12 978 281
12 839 931
12 521 317
12 224 995
11 931 909
11 706 658
150
11 280 310
10 455 784
10 322 777
10 098 526
6 000 000
100
4 000 000
2 000 000 50
0 0
Jun-07 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11 Jun-12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 Jun-16 Jun-17 Jun-18 Jun-22
Population served Litres / capita / dayWater balance components
1 600 7,5 8,0
7,0 7,1
1 400 6,5 7,0
6,3 6,3
System Input Volume (million m³/annum)
6,0 6,0 6,1
1 200 5,5 5,6 6,0
5,4
Infrastructure Leakage Index
1 000 5,0
800 3,5 4,0
600 3,0
400 2,0
200 1,0
- Target 0,0
Jun-07 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11 Jun-12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 Jun-16 Jun-17 Jun-18 Jun-22
Billed metered Billed unmetered Unbilled metered Unbilled unmetered
Commercial / Apparent losses Physical / Real losses Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI)As on 25 August 2020
Municipal Strategic Self
Assessment of Water Services
(MUSSA)
30MuSSA Sector Key Imperatives
Enable Local,
Support the Enhance
Provincial and
Municipality in Municipal
National
addressing its Planning via
Reporting
Vulnerabilities 5YRWSSDIP
requirementsChallenges to Delivering Reliable &
Safe Water Services
Competing political Poor water services planning
priorities & prioritization
Shifting Aging water
patterns in infrastructure;
water demand; increasing investment
rising energy needs
costs
Adequacy of water Changing workforce
resources; climate with rising lack of
change impact technical skills
Poor economic conditions,
with water services provision
often a “bankrupt business”GAUTENG OVERALL WATER NEEDS
GAUTENG OVERALL SANTIATION NEEDS
CATEGORISATIONWATER SERVICE LEVELS: TOTAL COMBINED
HOUSEHOLD INTERVENTIONSSANITATION SERVICE LEVELS: TOTAL COMBINED HOUSEHOLD INTERVENTIONS
GOVERNANCE The following water sector institutions operate in Gauteng: • TCTA • Provincial Operations (DWS) • Central Operations (Construction) • Vaal, Olifants and Limpopo/North West Proto-CMAs • Klipdrift Management/Irrigation Board (IB), Koppieskraal IB, Rietpoort IB, Vyfhoek South Management Board, Mooi River Government Water System
BLUE DEAL PROJECTS IN THE UPPER VAAL
BLESBOKSPRUIT
VREDEFORTE
DOME
BLUE DEAL
PROJECT
2019/2020
(Co-Funded by
RSA & LIEBENBERGSVLEI
Netherlands)BLUE DEAL PROJECTS IN THE UPPER VAAL
• Vreedeforte Dome World Heritage
Site (prevent pollution of Vaal River -
contribute to international status)
• Blesbokspruit Ramsar Site
(Montreal protocol) (protection of the
wetland – contribute to international
status)
• Liebenbergsvlei Catchment
(manage unlawful water use – water
from Lesotho must reach intended
users)
39WSDP & Master Plan
• The eWSDP roll-out started in April 2017 and continues support is
provided to the Gauteng WSA’s.
• The DWS target is to have the Provincial Master Plan done by March
2021.
• Continuous WSDP support available to ensure WSA’s do update the
WEB- Based WSDP system.
• The Water and Sanitation departments within the WSA’s and
Planning sections must work hand in hand to ensure that proper
Master Planning take place.
• Procurement in process to assist with the Gauteng Water and
Sanitation Master Plan.
40SEDIBENG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY
• PART 2.1: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH
• REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT
• WATER SERVICES INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT
• MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT
412020/21 regional bulk infrastructure grant
allocations
Water service Project name Projects status Population Driver 2020/21
authority allocation in
R’000
Emfuleni Local Sedibeng Regional Planning 108 000 Sanitation 58 440 000
Municipality WWTW (Leeukuil &
Reitspruit)
Sebokeng WWTW Construction 402 270 Sanitation 243 000 000
Vaal River Intervention Implementation 510 270 Sanitation 911 000 000
Midvaal Local Rothdene Raising Main Construction 60 000 Sanitation 40 000 000
Municipality
Total 1 252 802 000
42Sedibeng Regional Sanitation Scheme
(SRSS)
• The Sedibeng Regional Sanitation Scheme (SRSS) is a multi-faceted
sanitation project that aims to develop sustainable bulk sanitation
capacity in the Sedibeng region, deliver effective solutions to prevent
pollution of strategic national water resources and unlock development
projects and economic opportunities in the region that require
sanitation services.
100 Mℓ/day upgrade to Sebokeng WWTW (two modules of 50
Mℓ/day)
15 Mℓ/day upgrade to Meyerton WWTW
Sedibeng Regional Sanitation Scheme which comprises of
15 Mℓ/day upgrade to Leeuwkuil WWTW
35 Mℓ/day upgrade to Rietspruit WWTW
43Sebokeng WWTW (SRSS)
Project Description Target/Catalytic Effect 120 000 HH
Construction of the new 100 Mℓ/day (2 modules, 5 & 6 of
50 Mℓ/day each) in Sebokeng WWTW to deliver an
effective solution that will eradicate the pollution into the Project Phase Construction (Module 6)
Vaal River and its tributaries; create regional bulk
Project Start Aug 2013 Project Finish August 2020
sanitation infrastructure for the Southern Gauteng Region
to address under capacity of WWTWs.
Estimated Total Cost at Completion R1 123 584 000
Project Scope (50Mℓ/day)
Total Expenditure to Date R801 553 719
Construction of 50 Mℓ/day module 6:
Biological Nutrient Reactor. R’000 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Chlorine Contact Channel.
Secondary Settling Tanks & Primary Settling Tanks. MTEF Budget Original R128 912 R243 000 R150 000
Inlet works upgrade. MTEF Budget Revised
Sludge drying facility and drying beds.
Admin block & Perimeter fencing.
Summary Progress
Civil work 99% complete.
Mechanical work is 100% complete.
Bulk Electrical work is 100% complete.
Electrical & Instrumentation work is 100% complete.
Perimeter fence is 8% complete.
Key Issues/ Challenges
Internal roads and Perimeter fencing to be completed
during implementation of Module 7.
Continues Stoppages of Commissioning by the
community
Way forward
Completion of the commissioning process and hand
over the project
44Meyerton WWTW (SRSS)
Project Description Target/Catalytic Effect 19113 HH
15 Mℓ/day upgrade to Meyerton WWTW to deliver an
effective solution that will eradicate the pollution into the
Vaal River and its tributaries; create regional bulk Project Phase Construction
sanitation infrastructure for the Southern Gauteng Region
Project Start June 2014 Project Finish Depend on Civil contract
to address under capacity of WWTWs.
Estimated Total Cost at Completion R257 462 189
Project Scope
Total Expenditure to Date R210 679 572
Construction of 15 Mℓ/day module:
Biological Nutrient Reactor. R’000 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Chlorine Contact Channel.
Secondary Settling Tanks & Primary Settling Tanks. MTEF Budget Original R56 749 0 R0
Inlet works upgrade. MTEF Budget Revised
Sludge drying facility and drying beds.
Admin block & Perimeter fencing.
Summary Progress
Civil works is 94% complete (contractor liquidated).
Mechanical works is 81% complete (awaiting
completion of civil works to resume).
Electrical works is 88% (awaiting completion of civil
works to resume).
Key Issues/ Challenges
Project stoppages by community.
Civil contractor has demobilised due to liquidation.
Delays as a result of the demobilisation by civil.
contractor.
Way forward
Awaiting appointment of the new contractor to
complete the remaining scope.
45Rothdene Pump Station & Rising Main
Project Description Target/Catalytic Effect 15 000 HH
Construction of new Rothdene pump station rising main in
Meyerton (Midvaal LM).
Project Phase Tender
Project Start November 2019 Project Finish November 2021
Project Scope Estimated Total Cost at Completion R117 000 000
• A new 4.7km long HDPE rising main of 900mm
Total Expenditure to Date R1 212 094
nominal diameter to be installed from the pump station
to the treatment works.
• Air valves and chambers to be installed on the new R’000 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
rising main. MTEF Budget Original R80 000 R40 000 R40 000
• Scour valves and chambers to be installed on the new MTEF Budget Revised
rising main.
• Isolating valves and chambers to be installed.
Summary Progress
• Contractor Appointed in May 2020
• Completed Site Establishment.
• Procured Material to be used, e.g. Pipes & fitting for the
line.
• Contractor has also started with earthworks
Key Issues/ Challenges
Some landowners still to give access to the
contractor when to start working in their land
Way forward
Municipality still to persuade the landowners
46Rietspruit & Leeuwkuil WWTWs (SRSS)
Project Description Target/Catalytic Effect 15 000 HH
Upgrade of the Rietspruit and Leeuwkuil WWTWs to
deliver an effective solution that will eradicate the pollution
into the Vaal River and its tributaries; create regional bulk Project Phase Tender
sanitation infrastructure for the Southern Gauteng Region
Project Start April 2013 Project Finish June 2035
to address under capacity of WWTWs.
Estimated Total Cost at Completion R3 000 000 000
Project Scope
Upgrade Rietspruit WWTW by 35 Mℓ/day. Total Expenditure to Date R156 774 668
Upgrade Leeuwkuil WWTW by 15 Mℓ/day.
Sludge pipeline between the two WWTW’s R’000 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Upgrade bulk network and pump stations reduction MTEF Budget Original R70 000 R58 440 R274 214
Provision for bulk pipeline from Savanna mega project MTEF Budget Revised
Summary Progress
Construction has commenced with the exposing of
existing services.
The Mechanical & Electrical work is currently under the
procurement processes for tender advertisement.
Key Issues/ Challenges
Delay in operations and maintenance is delaying the
condition assessment of the gravity main to PS 34 to
ascertain its upgrade capacity requirements.
Way forward
To fastrack operations and maintenance work approval
and execution.
472020/21 water service infrastructure grant allocations
Local municipality Project name 2020/21
allocation in
R’000
Lesedi Local Replacement of AC water pipes in 15 825 000
Municipality Heidelberg: Phase 5
Lesedi Local The upgrading of the Outfall Sewer
Municipality pipeline in Ratanda Extension 2
Midvaal Local Aged Bulk Water Pipe Replacement and 15 825 000
Municipality Installation of New Bulk Pipeline.
Midvaal Local Supply, delivery and installation of
Municipality pressure management infrastructure.
Sub-total for WSIG 5B allocation 31 650 000
Emfuleni Local Sharpeville Reservoir Refurbishment 40 000 000
Municipality
Three Rivers Reservoir Refurbishment
Sub-total for WSIG 6B allocation 40 000 000
48Midvaal LM (WSIG) 2019/20
Remedial
2 Projects under implementation work in
Backfilling of pipe in progress
progress
PROJECT NAME : Aged Bulk Water Pipe
Replacement (Water Demand Management)
17km of AC pipe to be replaced.
PROJECT STAGE: Construction Phase
PROJECT COST : 9 000 000
VILLAGES BENEFITING : Meyerton
JOBS CREATED : 10
NO OF HH: 38 081
PROJECT NAME: Supply, delivery and installation of
pressure management infrastructure (Pipes and
valves)
PROJECT STAGE: Construction Phase
PROJECT COST : R 6 000 000
VILLAGES BENEFITING : Meyerton
JOBS CREATED : 10
NO OF HH: 38 081Lesedi LM (WSIG) 2019/20
Remedial
(2 Projects to be implemented) work in
Backfilling of pipe in progress
progress
PROJECT NAME : Replacement of AC water
pipes in Heidelberg
PROJECT STAGE: BID ADJUDICATION
STAGE
PROJECT COST : 8 000 000
VILLAGES BENEFITING : Heidelberg
JOBS CREATED : 10
NO OF HH: 39 294
PROJECT NAME: The upgrading of the sewer pipeline
in Tokolohong Agri-village
PROJECT STAGE: BID ADJUDICATION STAGE
PROJECT COST : R 7 000 000
VILLAGES BENEFITING : Meyerton
JOBS CREATED : 10
NO OF HH: 38 0812020/21 MIG Allocations
Municipality Project name MIG amount (R)
Emfuleni LM Various sewer projects Three rivers, Three rivers east, Sonlanpark 13 899 999.40
Emfuleni LM Upgrade gravity outfall sewer: Union street 25 650 000.00
Gravity sewer line from Houtkop and Unitaspark north of Leeuwkuil WWTW to
Emfuleni LM PS3D 25 540 000.01
Emfuleni LM Upgrading of existing main outfall sewer on the Northern area 25 320 000.00
Emfuleni LM Upgrading of sewer pipelines from PS8: rising main to stilling box 23 400 000.00
Emfuleni LM Gravity sewer line from industrial area through Boipatong / Tshepiso to ps4 9 000 000.00
Emfuleni LM Rehabilitation of Emfuleni pump stations: pump station 8, 9 and 10 31 261 132.17
Emfuleni LM Bulk water supply from Tshepiso to Sharpeville (W&S) 24 500 000.00
Emfuleni LM Bulk water supply from Evaton Reservior to Dadeville 16 940 000.00
Emfuleni LM Refurbishment of Waterdal pressure station (Evaton/Sebokeng) Covid19 project 2 500 000.00
Emfuleni LM Refurbishment of Vanderbijlpark reservoirs COVID19 PROJECT 3 502 000.00
Repairs and maintenance of Rietspruit waste water treatment works. (Repairs and
maintenance to the existing chlorine dosing system and replacement of the existing
Emfuleni LM inlet) covid19 project 6 282 111.83
Repairs and maintenance of Sebokeng waste water treatment works
(refurbishment of the existing dosing system at the Sebokeng WWTW) covid19
Emfuleni LM project 2 482 111.83
Upgrading of sewer pumpstation (repairs and maintenance of pumps and related
Emfuleni LM electrical and mechanical infrastructure at the 35 pump) Covid19 project 7 100 000.00
512020/21 MIG Allocations
Municipality Project name MIG amount (R)
Provision of gravity bulk sewer in the area of Shiceka in
Midvaal LM Meyerton, Gauteng 13 467 417.42
Sicelo/Highbury Reservoir & mains (Upgrading of bulk water
Midvaal LM supply for Sicelo and other areas) 76 889 833.00
Henley on Klip: construction of sewer reticulation within
Midvaal LM Midvaal 2 835 000.00
Midvaal LM Mamello Sewerage Scheme Augmentation 10 844 661.54
Vaal Marina bulk water supply augmentation for new low cost
Midvaal LM housing development of Mamello 5 113 733.00
52WEST RAND DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY
• PART 2.1: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH
• REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT
• WATER SERVICES INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT
• MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT
532020/21 regional bulk infrastructure grant
allocations
Water service Project name Projects status Population Driver 2020/21
authority allocation in
R’000
Rand West City Design / Tender 8 681 Backlog/ 1 747
Local Westonaria Regional Bulk Sanitation Housing
Municipality (Zuurbekom)
Design / Tender 5 371 Backlog/ 0
Housing
Mohlakeng pump station and sewer
outfall
54Westonaria Regional Sanitation Scheme (WRSS)
• The project is part of the then Westonaria LM now merged
with Randfontein LM to form Rand West City LM.
• It aims to provide additional waste water treatment capacity
within West Rand due to anticipated number of developments
in the area.
• The Scheme consist of the following projects:
Adding 15 Mℓ/day to the existing 22Mℓ/day at Hannes
van Niekerk WWTW. The project has been completed.
Build new 80 Mℓ/day Zuurbekom WWTW in 4 phases of
20 Mℓ/day modules due to financial constrains. However
the first phase will also see the construction of the
40Mℓ/day Head of Works with peripheral structures.
Build Mohlakeng (Westonaria) Pump Station and
pipelines linking the two WWTWs (Hannes van Niekerk
and Zuurbekom) as well as rehabilitation of Emergency
Pump Station.
Construct bulk pipelines to Syferfontein housing
development.Zuurbekon WWTW (WRSS)
Project Description Target/Catalytic Effect 70 000 HH
Construction of the new 80 Mℓ/day Zuurbekom Waste
Water Treatment Works to cater for West Rand Area,
Western Parts of City of Johannesburg including Protea Project Phase Tender
Glen and Syferfontein housing development. The project
Project Start 01 Nov 2019 Project Finish 20 June 2023
will be built in 4 phases of 20 Mℓ/day modules.
Estimated Total Cost at Completion R1 570 000 000
Project Scope (20Mℓ/day)
Construction of 20 Mℓ/day module: Total Expenditure to Date R47 000 000
40 Mℓ/day Head of Works.
Division Structure. R’000 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Balancing Tank. MTEF Budget Original R70 000 R1 747 R100 000
Biological Nutrient Reactor. MTEF Budget Revised
MCC Building.
Terracing.
Summary Progress
Environmental Authorisation has been completed.
Bill of Quantities being finalised by Quantity Surveyor.
Geoscience report submitted in September 2019 to
finalise the WUL application.
SCM procurement processes to be initiated by end of
October 2019.
Key Issues/ Challenges
Final effluent outflow pipeline encroachment by
informal settlement.
WUL application for it was cancelled pending
Geoscience report and project being put on hold.
Way forward
Re-application 4.8MVA 11KV Eskom Bulk Electrical
supply Cost estimate quotation.
56Mohlakeng PS & Sewer Outfall (WRSS)
Project Description Target/Catalytic Effect 36 410 HH
To construct Mohlakeng Pump Station, the outfall sewer
to Hannes van Niekerk WWTW, rehabilitation of the
emergency Pump Station and construction of a pipeline Project Phase Tender
from Mohlakeng PS to the proposed Zuurbekom WWTW.
Project Start Nov 2019 Project Finish Mar 2023
Project Scope
Estimated Total Cost at Completion R115 000 000
Construction of Pump Station.
Construction o Auxiliary Building. Total Expenditure to Date R11 000 000
Construction of Guardhouse.
Construction of pipeline. R’000 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Demolition of the existing emergency pump station, MTEF Budget Original R37 500 R48 924 R61 500
sump and pipeline.
MTEF Budget Revised
Summary Progress
Environmental Authorisation has been completed.
Design and Implementation ready study completed.
Geoscience report submitted in September 2019 to
finalise the WUL application.
SCM procurement processes for civil work has been
initiated.
Key Issues/ Challenges
Rand West City LM has requested that the transfer of
cost of the land where the pump station will be paid
under the project.
WUL application for area where pump station will be
built to be restarted as it was cancelled by the DWS
due to lack of paperwork – DW 902/903 could not be
signed by land owners (as per land issue above).
Way forward
RWLM are in the process of registering land.
DW 902/903 forms can then be signed by RWLM.
57UNFUNDED REGIONAL
BULK INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECTSyferfontein Bulk W&S Pipelines (WRSS)
Project Description Target/Catalytic Effect 60 000 HH
To construct a new 1.2m diameter bulk water supply line,
water storage reservoirs as well as new bulk sewerage
lines, pump stations to pump the sewer to the proposed Project Phase Planning
Zuurbekom WWTW.
Project Start Nov 2019 Project Finish Mar 2023
Project Scope Estimated Total Cost at Completion R1 047 000 000
Scoping processes & Options analysis
Conduct technical feasibilities studies & IRS Total Expenditure to Date R0
Design of final options
Application for servitudes R’000 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Geotechnical investigations MTEF Budget Proposed R142 700 000 R162 000 000 R250 000 000
Undertaking of EIA & WUL applications. MTEF Budget Original R0 R0 R0
Construction phases.
MTEF Budget Revised
Summary Progress
Memorandum of Understanding between DOH & DWS.
Preliminary Designs complete.
Detail Designs – Awaiting Instruction to Proceed
Key Issues/ Challenges
Way forward
DWS to issue instruction to proceed with detailed
designs
59Lindley WWTW
Project Description Target/Catalytic Effect 72 460 HH
To construct a new 20 Mℓ/day Lindley WWTW that will
service the North Eastern Region of Mogale City Local
Municipality (MCLM), enabling the Municipality to deliver Project Phase Planning
a high degree of service to the rapidly expanding Project Start Nov 2019 Project Finish Mar 2023
population.
Estimated Total Cost at Completion R399 151 934
Project Scope
The proposed Lindley WWTW includes the following Total Expenditure to Date R0
components:-
Screening and de-gritting; R’000 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Primary settling (if required); MTEF Budget Original R0 R0 R0
Flow balancing; MTEF Budget Revised
Conventional biological nutrient removal;
Secondary settling;
Chlorine dosing; and
Sludge management.
Proposed
Summary Progress WWTP
Urban design framework and layout plan completed. (MCLM) Lindley
Designs completed.
Environmental Authorizations completed.
Key Issues/ Challenges
Way forward
DWS to issue instruction to proceed with detailed
designs
60Lion Park/Lanseria Bulk W&S Pipelines
Project Description Target/Catalytic Effect 15 000 HH
To construct a new 1.2m diameter bulk water supply line,
water storage reservoirs as well as new bulk sewerage
lines, pump stations to pump the sewer to the proposed Project Phase Planning
Zuurbekom WWTW.
Project Start Nov 2019 Project Finish Mar 2023
Project Scope
Estimated Total Cost at Completion R8 050 000 000
The proposed Lindley WWTW includes the following
components:- Total Expenditure to Date R0
16km Outfall sewer must be constructed from the
Driefontein WWTW up to the position of the new R’000 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Lindley WWTW. MTEF Budget Original R0 R0 R0
Phase 1 and 2 (each with a 10 Mℓ/d sewage module) MTEF Budget Revised
which should be constructed by 2020.
Phase 3 and 4 (each with a 20 Mℓ/d module) should be
constructed by 2040.
Summary Progress
Urban design framework and layout plan completed.
Designs completed.
Environmental Authorizations completed.
Key Issues/ Challenges
Way forward
DWS to issue instruction to proceed with detailed
designs on bulk sewer and WWTW.
Proceed with bulk water infrastructure – supply lines
and reservoirs.
612020/21 water service infrastructure grant
allocations
Local municipality Project name 2020/21 allocation in
R’000
Merafong City Local Upgrading the Wedela WWTW Phase 2 15 000
Municipality
Relocation of Khutsong reservoir and related bulk infrastructure. 21 925
Rand West City Local 388Provisioning of Sewer infrastructure Services for Mohlakeng Ext 5 38 460
Municipality Township
Mogale City Local 25 200
Municipality Mogale City Rural Water and Sanitation Projects- Bulk Water Supply
Mogale City water conservation and water demand management: Water 17 000
pipeline replacement
Sub-total for WSIG 5B allocation 67 106
62Rand West City LM (WSIG)
(2 Projects under implementation)
PROJECT NAME : Randfontein
wastewater treatment plant phase Remedial
work in
progress
2. Desluging of the BNR, Chlorine
contact tank & SST no1 including
installation of new Pumps.
PROJECT STAGE: Construction
Stage
PROJECT COST : R 25 109 504
VILLAGES BENEFITING : PROJECT NAME: Provision of water
Randfontein reticulation by a pipeline form the Hills
JOBS CREATED : 10
Haven and a pumpstation
NO OF HH: 15 000
PROJECT STAGE: Construction
PROJECT COST : R 35 685 027
VILLAGES BENEFITING : Thusanang
JOBS CREATED : 15
NO OF HH: 30 000Mogale City LM (WSIG)
(2 Projects under implementation)
1. PROJECT NAME : Mogale City Rural
Remedial
Water and Sanitation Projects- Bulk Water work in
Backfilling of pipe in progress
progress
Supply
PROJECT STAGE: Construction
PROJECT COST : R 25 000 000
VILLAGES BENEFITING : Tarlton,
Smokedown,
Driefontien
JOBS TO BE CREATED : 15
NO OF HH: 1302 2. PROJECT NAME : Mogale City water
conservation and water demand management:
Water pipeline replacement
PROJECT STAGE: Construction
PROJECT COST : R 15 000 000
VILLAGES BENEFITING: Mindalore
JOBS TO BE CREATED : 10
NO OF HH: 17000Merafong City LM (WSIG)
2 Projects under implementation
PROJECT NAME : Relocation of
Khutsong reservoir and related bulk Remedial
work in
Backfilling of pipe in progress
infrastructure. progress
PROJECT STAGE: Under construction
PROJECT COST : 95 000 000 ( R 20 000
000)
VILLAGES BENEFITING : Khutsong
Community
JOBS CREATED : 27
NO OF HH: 10 601
PROJECT NAME: Wedela wastewater
Pictures on the right showing final base of
the reservoir treatment plant upgrade.
PROJECT STAGE: Construction Phase
PROJECT COST : R 15 000 000
VILLAGES BENEFITING : Wedela
Township
JOBS CREATED : 10
NO OF HH: 25862020/21 MIG Allocations
Municipality Project name MIG amount (R)
Lesedi LM Upgrading of Devon Waste Water Treatment 60 000 000.00
Merafong LM Sludge drying beds Kokosi and Khutsong WWTW 32 250 603.94
Merafong LM Rehabilitation of bulk water supply in Merafong 6 900 000.00
Rand West LM Construction of Glenharvie alternative pump supply pipeline 47 345 684.72
Rand West LM Hillshaven outfall sewer 53 567 051.61
66FAILING WWTW WITHIN METRO MUNICIPALITIES
67WWTW Status in City of Johannesburg
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Goudkoppies 150 135 111 ASP 500 000 Klip River that R1 417 500 000 Poor condition.
Designed to flows Vaal River Aged infrastructure.
biological remove (Then Orange Partially operational.
nutrients (carbon, River) Final effluent not
nitrogen and complying with the
phosphorus) discharge standard
Northern Work 450 410 363 ASP 1 200 000 Jukskei River R4 830 000 000 Aged infrastructure.
Designed to that feed Partially operational.
biological remove Crocodile River Final effluent not
nutrients (carbon, complying with the
nitrogen and discharge standard.
phosphorus)
Olifantsvlei 200 180 216 ASP and Biofilter 850 000 Klip River that R2 100 000 000 Fair condition and
Designed to flows Vaal River functioning.
biological remove (Then Orange Final effluent not
nutrients (carbon, River) complying with the
nitrogen and discharge standard
phosphorus)WWTW Status in City of Tshwane
Wastewater treated by 15 WWTW - 1 micro, 2 small, 3 medium, 2
large and 7 macro treatment plants
4 plants meet treatment efficiency - Daspoort, Ekangala, Sandspruit
and Zeekoegat - and final effluent complied with the standards for
discharge
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Babelegi 4.5 2.3 2.3 ASP 69 Apies River that R 24 200 000 Aged infrastructure.
Designed to Industries flows to Partially operational.
biological remove Crocodile River Final effluent not
nutrients (carbon, complying with the
nitrogen and discharge standard.
phosphorus)
Baviaanspoort 60 60 47.27 ASP 366 709 Pienaars River R 630 000 000 Mixed: aged and new
Designed to that flows to infrastructure.
biological remove Crocodile River Two old modules not in
nutrients (carbon, operation.
nitrogen and Final effluent not
phosphorus) complying with the
discharge standard.
Daspoort 60 55 37.4 ASP and Biofilter 865 531 Apies River that R 577 500 000 Operational or well
Designed to flows to functioning.
biological remove Crocodile River Final effluent
nutrients (carbon, complying with the
nitrogen and discharge standard.
phosphorus)WWTW Status in Tshwane (cont…)
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Ekangala 2 10 10 ASP 59 457 Unknown River, R 140 000 000 New, need
Designed to triburay of refurbishment
biological remove Bronkhorstspruit, Operational.
nutrients (carbon, tributary of Wilge Final effluent
nitrogen and River that flows complying with the
phosphorus) to Olifants River discharge standard.
Godrich 5 5 6 ASP 12 470 Bronkhorstspruit, R 52 500 000 Aged infrastructure.
Designed to tributary of Wilge Partially operational.
biological remove River that flows Final effluent not
nutrients (carbon, to Olifants River complying with the
nitrogen and discharge standard.
phosphorus)
Klipgat 55 55 32 ASP and Biofilter 242 470 Toloane River R 577 500 000 Vandalised.
Designed to that flows to Untreated and partially
biological remove Crocodile River treated sewage
nutrients (carbon, discharge to the water
nitrogen and resource. Plant pollute
phosphorus) the surface water and
the environment.
Rayton 1.2 0.6 0.6 ASP 8 166 Elands River, R 12 600 000 Aged infrastructure.
Designed to tributary of Partially operational.
biological remove Crocodile River Final effluent not
nutrients (carbon, complying with the
nitrogen and discharge standard.
phosphorus) Partially treated
sewage discharge to
the water resource.WWTW Status in Tshwane (cont…)
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Refilwe 1.15 1.15 1.7 ASP 40 000 Mine Dam from R 23 100 000 Aged infrastructure.
Designed to Cullinan Partially operational.
biological remove Diamond Mine Final effluent not
nutrients (carbon, complying with the
nitrogen and discharge standard.
phosphorus) Partially treated
sewage discharge to
the water resource.
Rietgat 27 20 15.3 ASP 514 134 Kutswane, R 210 000 000 Mixed: aged and new
Designed to tributary to infrastructure.
biological remove Sandspruit, Final effluent not
nutrients (carbon, tribrutary of complying with the
nitrogen and Toloane River discharge standard.
phosphorus) that flows to Partially treated
Crocodile River sewage discharge to
the water resource.
Rooiwal 245 200 172 ASP and Biofilter 1 268 693 Apies River that R 2 310 000 00 Aged infrastructure.
Designed to flows to Partially operational.
biological remove Crocodile River Biofilter not in
nutrients (carbon, operation.
nitrogen and Final effluent not
phosphorus) complying with the
discharge standard.
Untreated and partially
treated sewage
discharge to the water
resource. Plant pollute
the surface water,
groundwater and the
environment.WWTW Status in Tshwane (cont…)
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Sandspruit 20 20 8.4 ASP 403 162 Sandspruit, R 210 000 000 Good condition.
Designed to atribrutary of Final effluent
biological remove Toloane River complying with the
nutrients (carbon, that flows to discharge standard.
nitrogen and Crocodile River Partially treated
phosphorus) sewage discharge to
the water resource for
short period of time
and that matter was
resolved.
Summer Place 0.3 0.3 0.3 ASP 10 000 Bronkhorstspruit R 3 200 000 Fair condition.
Package Plant Designed to Dam that Final effluent not
biological remove overflows to complying with the
nutrients (carbon, Bronkhorstspruit discharge standard.
nitrogen and that flows to Partially treated
phosphorus) Olifants River sewage discharge to
the water resource.
Sunderland 65 95 57.2 ASP and Biofilter 236 580 Hennops River R 210 000 000 Mixed: aged and new
Ridge Designed to that flows to infrastructure.
biological remove Crocodile River Final effluent not
nutrients (carbon, complying with the
nitrogen and discharge standard.
phosphorus) Partially treated
sewage discharge to
the water resource.WWTW Status in City of Tshwane
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Temba 12.5 32.5 7.5 ASP and Biofilter 102 790 Apies River that R 131 300 000 Mixed: aged and new
Designed to flows to infrastructure.
biological remove Crocodile River Final effluent not
nutrients (carbon, complying with the
nitrogen and discharge standard.
phosphorus) Partially treated
sewage discharge to
the water resource.
Zeekoegat 30 85 45.9 ASP 10 861 Pienaars River R 315 000 000 New infrastructure and
Designed to that flows to well functioning.
biological remove Crocodile River Final effluent
nutrients (carbon, complying with the
nitrogen and discharge standard.
phosphorus)WWTW Status in City of Ekurhuleni
Wastewater treated by 3 WWTW - 1 micro and 2 macro treatment plants
Good condition and well functioning
Excellent operation and maintenance
All plants meet treatment efficiency and final effluent complied with the
standards for discharge
Non-compliance effluent occurs due to failures that depend on the
condition of the process units affected
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Ancor 34.5 15 33.48 Biofilter 100 000 Blesbokspruit, R 346 500 000 The operating Civil
Designed to tributary of structures are in an
biological remove Suikerbosrand poor working condition.
carbon and River that flows Aged infrastructure
nitrogen only Vaal River (Then Old Biofilter, PST,
Not capable to Orange River) Digesters, Clarifiers,
remove ortho- Methane tank, SST,
phosphate Incinerator and
Ortho-phosphate Biosure plant
is treated by decommissioned
tertiary chemical
treatmentWWTW Status in City of Ekurhuleni (cont…)
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Benoni 9.3 16 4.83 Biofilter 100 000 Blesbokspruit, R 168 000 000 The operating civil
Designed to tributary of infrastructures are in
biological remove Suikerbosrand an fair working
carbon and River that flows condition. Aged
nitrogen only Vaal River (Then infrastructure Old PST
Not capable to Orange River) 1-5, Bio-filter 1-8,
remove ortho- Humus tank 1-4,
phosphate secondary digester 1 &
Ortho-phosphate 2, Old division tower 1-
is treated by 2, old inlet works,
tertiary chemical water tower and old
treatment tank 1-3
decommissioned.
Carl 5 5 2.81 ASP 100 000 Blesbokspruit, R 63 000 000 The current operating
Grundlingh Designed to tributary of module exhibited no
biological remove Suikerbosrand sign of structural
nutrients (carbon, River that flows distress, with the
nitrogen and Vaal River (Then exception of the
phosphorus) Orange River) reactor which exhibited
moderate localised
sign of structural
distress and concrete
deterioration.WWTW Status in City of Ekurhuleni (cont…)
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Daveyton 16 19 13.72 ASP and Biofilter 100 000 Blesbokspruit, R 168 000 000 The operating civil
Designed to tributary of structures are in an
biological remove Suikerbosrand good condition. Aged
nutrients (carbon, River that flows infrastructure. Division
nitrogen and Vaal River (Then box 1-4, Bio-filter 1-3,
phosphorus) Orange River) sludge drying beds,
digester 1-4, PST 1-2,
Humus tank 1-2,
overflow weir/Grit
channel/screens,
supernatant tank, WAS
pump station, B
station, and Pump
station B
decommissioned.
Dekema 35 31 30.25 Biofilter Natalspruit, R 378 000 000 The operating civil
Designed to tributary of structures are in an fair
biological remove Rietspruit that working condition.
carbon and flows Vaal River Aged infrastructure
nitrogen only (Then Orange Methane gas tank and
Not capable to River) gas building
remove ortho- decommissioned,
phosphate
Ortho-phosphate
is treated by
tertiary chemical
treatmentWWTW Status in City of Ekurhuleni (cont…)
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Esther Park 0.4 1 0.81 ASP Modderfontein R 10 500 000 The operating civil
Designed to Spruit, a infrastructure is in a
biological remove tributary of moderate condition
carbon and Jukskei River with minor localised
nitrogen only that flows to sign of structural
Not capable to Crocodile River distress and
remove ortho- deterioration.
phosphate
Ortho-phosphate
is treated by
tertiary chemical
treatment
Hartebeesfonte 45 63 59.51 ASP 100 000 Hennops River R 472 500 000 The operation civil
in Designed to that flows to structures are in a fair
biological remove Crocodile River working condition with
nutrients (carbon, some of the structure
nitrogen and exhibiting signs of
phosphorus) deterioration.
Herbert Bickley 12.5 15.1 17.24 ASP and Biofilter 100 000 Blesbokspruit, R 110 300 000 The structures of the
Designed to tributary of plant are generally in
biological remove Suikerbosrand good working
nutrients (carbon, River that flows condition, except the
nitrogen and Vaal River (Then two the two old
phosphorus) Orange River) anaerobic digester,
two Bio-filter units and
the primary sludge
pumping station of
module 2.WWTW Status in City of Ekurhuleni (cont…)
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Jan Smuts 9 6.1 7.36 Biofilter 30 000 Blesbokspruit, R 94 500 000 The operating civil
Designed to tributary of structures exhibited
biological remove Suikerbosrand minor to moderate
carbon and River that flows signs of deterioration
nitrogen only Vaal River (Then with some of the
Not capable to Orange River) structures.
remove ortho-
phosphate
Ortho-phosphate
is treated by
tertiary chemical
treatment
J.P. Marais 15 15 16.12 ASP 50 000 Blesbokspruit, R 136 500 000 The operating civil
Designed to tributary of structures are in an
biological remove Suikerbosrand acceptable working
nutrients (carbon, River that flows condition.
nitrogen and Vaal River (Then
phosphorus) Orange River)
Olifantsfontein 105 105 91.34 ASP 100 000 Kaalspruit, a R 1 102 500 000 The operating civil
Designed to tributary of structures are in an
biological remove Hennops River acceptable condition
nutrients (carbon, that flows to with no significant
nitrogen and Crocodile River visible signs of
phosphorus) structural distress
exhibitedWWTW Status in City of Ekurhuleni (cont…)
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity( Capacity (ML/d) System)
ML/d) (ML/d)
Rondebult 36 20 17.2 ASP and Biofilter 10 000 Elsburg overflows R 378 000 000 The operating civil
Designed to to Natalspruit, structures exhibited
biological remove tributary of minor to moderate
nutrients (carbon, Rietspruit that signs of deterioration
nitrogen and flows Vaal River with some of the
phosphorus) (Then Orange structures.
River)
Rynfield 10 9.15 ASP and Biofilter 10 000 Blesbokspruit, R 136 500 000 The operating Civil
13 Designed to tributary of structure exhibited
biological remove Suikerbosrand minor signs of
nutrients (carbon, River that flows structural distress and
nitrogen and Vaal River (Then deterioration.
phosphorus) Orange River)
Tsakane 10.8 20 15.66 ASP 20 000 Blesbokspruit, R 105 000 000 The operating Civil
Designed to tributary of structure exhibited
biological remove Suikerbosrand minor signs of
nutrients (carbon, River that flows structural distress and
nitrogen and Vaal River (Then deterioration.
phosphorus) Orange River)
Vlakplaats 83 55 101.35 ASP (new) and 200 000 Natalspruit, R 871 500 000 The operating civil
Biofilter Designed tributary of structures are in an fair
to biological Rietspruit that working condition with
remove nutrients flows Vaal River no significant visible
(carbon, nitrogen (Then Orange signs of structural
and phosphorus) River) distress exhibited, with
the exception of the
inlet, primary settling
tanks, digesters and
some mechanical
equipment. There are
signs of cracking.WWTW Status in City of Ekurhuleni (cont…)
WWTW Original Actual Operational Technology Population Catchment Value Condition
Design Design Capacity Type (River
Capacity Capacity (ML/d) System)
(ML/d) (ML/d)
Waterval 105 170 281.74 ASP 100 000 Klip River that R 1 627 500 000 The operating Civil
Designed to flows Vaal River structures for all
biological remove (Then Orange modules exhibited
nutrients (carbon, River) minor to moderate
nitrogen and signs of
phosphorus) structural distress and
deterioration in the
midterm, with an
exception to some of
the old
digesters which
exhibited Moderate to
significant signs of
distress and
deterioration.
Welgedacht 35 95 93.84 ASP 20 000 Blesbokspruit, R 367 500 000 The operating Civil
Designed to tributary of structures are in an
biological remove Suikerbosrand acceptable working
nutrients (carbon, River that flows condition with no major
nitrogen and Vaal River (Then significant visible signs
phosphorus) Orange River) of structural distress
exhibited, with the
exception of the
existing MV Switch
room which exhibited
moderate to significant
signs of differential
settlement and
cracking.REGULATION: DRINKING WATER COMPLIANCE
81Regulation: Waste Water Compliance
82Thank you
83You can also read
