BEA's Regional Accounts: An Update - C2ER Annual Conference 2019 June 7, 2019
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Outline •Regional Accounts Core Statistics •Recent Additions •Program Initiatives/New Statistics 2 6/11/2019
BEA’s Regional Core Statistics •Comprehensive subnational measures of U.S. economic activity •Consistent with BEA’s National and Industry Economic Accounts •Consistent across geography and over time
BEA’s Regional Core Statistics, Cont. Gross Domestic Product • The market value of goods and services produced by factors of production in each geography • Measured by the income earned from current production • Real (chained-dollar) GDP deflated using national industry prices • State Annual (1963-forward) • State Quarterly (2005-forward) • Metropolitan Area Annual (2001-forward)
BEA’s Regional Core Statistics, Cont. Personal Income and Employment • Income received by or on behalf of residents of a geography o Net earnings by place of residence o Property income o Personal current transfer receipts • Number of jobs, full and part-time o Wage and salary employment o Proprietors’ employment • State Annual (1929/1969– forward) • State Quarterly (1948 – forward) • County and Metro Area Annual (1969 – forward)
BEA’s Regional Core Statistics, Cont. Regional Input Output Modeling System (RIMS II) • Regional economic model for impact analysis o Study economic impacts of a wide range of projects o Measure impact of an initial change in economic activity on industries within a defined geography • RIMS II multipliers o Based on industry relationships from national input-output accounts o Adjusted for leakages with regional data o Customizable geographies o The impacts measured in terms of output, value added, earnings, or employment
Recent Additions • Real Personal Income/Regional Price Parities (4/24/14) o Annual 2008-2017 | States and Metropolitan Areas • Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) by State (12/1/15) o Annual 1997-2017 | 16 spending categories • Quarterly GDP by State (12/10/15) o 2005Q1-2018Q4 | 21 industries • Arts and Cultural Production Satellite Account (ACPSA) o Annual 2001-2016 | Core and supporting arts industries o State compensation and employment (4/19/17) | State value added (3/6/18)
Regional Price Parities (RPPs) Regional price parities • Spatial price index o State and metropolitan areas o Goods, rents, other services • Measure the differences in the price levels of goods and services across states and metropolitan areas for a given year • Regional price levels expressed as a percentage of the overall national price level for a given year • Average RPP across states (US RPP) = 100
Interpreting RPPs Average price level in Connecticut o 8.0% higher than national average (108.0/100.0) o 11.3% higher than in Utah (108.0/97.0) Regional Price Parities, 2017 Services All Items Goods Rents Other United States 100.0 99.4 101.2 100.0 Connecticut 108.0 104.0 113.1 109.0 Hawaii 118.5 111.3 156.4 103.2 Mississippi 85.7 94.1 62.8 93.3 North Dakota 90.1 94.8 78.3 90.8 Utah 97.0 96.6 93.9 99.6 Range across all states 32.8 17.2 95.0 24.1 9 6/11/2019
RPPs for Large Metro Areas, 2017 10 6/11/2019
Real Personal Income •Personal income adjusted for price level differences o Across regions o Over time •Use RPPs in conjunction with BEA’s personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index •Allows for comparisons of the purchasing power of personal income across regions and over time 11 6/11/2019
Real Personal Income, Cont. Price adjustment for HI PI 75.4 PI at RPPs = = = 63.6 PCE Current$ Real RPP 1.185 State Price RPP PI PI Index ($ billion) ($ billion) 63.6 Balancing factor: = 63.8 Hawaii 106.1 118.5 75.4 60.2 0.996 PI at RPPs 63.8 South 106.1 88.2 42.5 45.5 Real PI = = = 60.2 Dakota PCE Index 1.061 United PI 75.4 106.1 100.0 16,820.3 15,857.2 States IRPD∗ = = = 125.2 Real PI 60.2 * Implicit Regional Price Deflator 12 6/11/2019
PCE by State • Measure of household spending by state of residence • Includes o Out-of-pocket household spending o Spending on behalf of households o Imputations ▪ Owner-occupied housing ▪ Financial services without explicit payment o Net expenditures of non-profit institutions serving households • Accounting framework aligns state personal income and expenditures 13 6/11/2019
PCE by State, Cont. •Examine spending trends over time •Per capita measures indicators of economic well- being •Fiscal policy, regional macro and I-O analysis •Geographic marketing information 14 6/11/2019
PCE by State, Cont. 15 6/11/2019
Quarterly GDP by State •Earlier read on state of the economy •Earlier identification of weakening industries •More precise timing of upturns and downturns in state economic activity 16 6/11/2019
Quarterly GDP by State, Cont. Michigan Real GDP: Percent Change from Preceding Period 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 Annual GDP Quarterly GDP -20 -25 -30 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 2007 2008 2009 2010 17 6/11/2019
Arts and Cultural Production (ACPSA) BEA’s Satellite Accounts • Frameworks designed to expand the analytical capacity of the standard accounts without interfering with their general purpose • Provide a laboratory for development of concepts and methodologies • Expand the detail of the accounts and allow for flexible classification structures • Allow more focus on a specific activity or sector 18 6/11/2019
ACPSA, Cont. • Measures the impact of arts and cultural activities on the U.S. and individual state economies • The value of the creative chain associated with arts and cultural production (creation, production, distribution, and consumption) • Creative artistic activity o The goods and services produced by such activity o The goods and services produced in support of such activity o The construction of buildings in which the activity takes place
Arts and Cultural Production, 2016 GDP Compensation Employment Total 18,707.2 billion 9,956.2 billion 148.7 million 804.2 billion 386.2 billion 5.0 million ACPSA 4.3% 3.9% 3.4%
Arts and Cultural Production Value Added: Percent of State GDP
Arts and Cultural Production Employment: Percent Change, 2015-2016
Program Initiatives/New Statistics •GDP by County •Outdoor Recreation Satellite Account (ORSA)
GDP by County • Provide a much richer picture of the geographic distribution of the nation’s economic activity o Assist analysts in the assessment of local economic performance o Inform resource allocation decisions o Assist planners and policymakers in the development of strategies that promote economic growth and in the assessment of strategies over the long run • Inform and lead to improvements of GDP by metropolitan area statistics and GDP by state statistics 24 6/11/2019
Prototype Release • Release date: December 12, 2018 • Data series: Annual current- and inflation-adjusted GDP statistics for all counties (3,113) • Industry detail: • All industry total ▪ Private goods-producing industries ▪ Private services-producing industries ▪ Government • Period: 2012-2015 25 6/11/2019
Percent Change in Real GDP by County, 2014-2015 Slope County, ND (-37.8%) North Dakota (-3.0%) Churchill County, NV (7.7%) Clark County, NV (9.5%) Nevada (4.3%) Roberts County, TX (72.3%) Texas (5.2%) 26 6/11/2019
Real GDP by County Growth in Nevada, 2014-2015 27 6/11/2019
Next Steps •Develop further improvements and refinements to the prototype statistics •Determine the level of industry detail for official release •Continue to solicit and incorporate data user feedback •Official release on December 12, 2019 28 6/11/2019
Outdoor Recreation (ORSA) • Measures the impact of outdoor recreation activities on the U.S. economy • Mandated by the “Outdoor Recreation Jobs and Economic Impact Act of 2016” • Prototype statistics for the U.S. released in February 2018 • Official statistics for the U.S. released in September 2018 • Regional dimension o The impact of outdoor recreation sector on each state’s economy o Recreation activities that are important to a state’s economy
Defining Outdoor Recreation Conventional outdoor recreation activities • Outdoor activities that usually occur in nature-based settings and that require physical exertion 30 6/11/2019
Defining Outdoor Recreation, Cont. Comprehensive outdoor recreation activities Percentage of Households Participating in Activities (2011—All Varieties) Any non-work time spent doing Activities Percent outdoor activities Walking for pleasure 82.2% (Oregon State University) Visiting historic sites 63.5% Visiting parks (local, state, national) 50.6% Visiting natural areas/preserves/refuges 50.3% Swimming, pool 43.1% Sunbathing/relaxing on a beach 41.3% Swimming, beach 38.3% Jogging/running 33.6% Using a playground 29.9% Picnicking away from home 28.0% Visiting gardens/arboretums 25.6% Hiking/backpacking 24.8% Source: Virginia Department of 31 Conservation and Recreation 6/11/2019
Outdoor Recreation, 2016 GDP Compensation Employment Total 18,707.2 billion 9,956.2 billion 148.7 million 412.0 billion 213.6 billion 4.5 million ORSA 2.2% 2.1% 3.0% Outdoor Recreation Economy U.S. Economy 4.3% 2.7% 2.5% 2.3% 1.7% 1.8% 1.6% 1.4% Real GDP Real Gross Output Compensation Employment
Next Steps •Research on methodology and developing data sources for regional accounts is under way •Plan to release prototype state-level statistics for public comment by the end of FY2019 o Annual 2012-2017 o Value added by industry and activity o Compensation and employment by industry
Contact Information Comments or questions? Send it to us at: gdpbycounty@bea.gov OutdoorRecreation@bea.gov Ledia Guci Chief of Regional Product Want more info? Division Check out: ledia.guci@bea.gov https://www.bea.gov/news/docs/innovation- 301.278.9788 at-bea https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gdp-county www.bea.gov/data/special-topics/outdoor- recreation 34 6/11/2019
You can also read