Assessment of relevant International Standards on Hydrocarbon use in large systems
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Co-funded by the European Union Assessment of relevant International Standards on Hydrocarbon use in large systems Implemented by:
Assessment of relevant international standards on hydrocarbon use in large systems Prepared by: Ignacio Vázquez Ramírez Project coordinator: SPODS Project coordination, UNIDO: Ester C. Monroy González April 2020 This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union (EU) and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). Its contents are the sole responsibility of Ignacio Vázquez Ramírez and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union and the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. The project Sustainable and climate-friendly Phase out of Ozone Depleting Substances (SPODS) assists selected Latin American and Caribbean countries with their transformation processes in fulfilling their obligations un- der the Montreal Protocol related to the phase-out of ozone depleting substances and current HFC mitigation. Photos provided by the project, if not stated otherwise.
Acronyms AC Air Conditioner MEPS Minimum energy performance ANFAD National Association of Manufacturers standards of Domestic Appliances MPU Montreal Protocol Unit ASHRAE American Society of Heating, MtCO2e Million metric tons of carbon dioxide Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning equivalent Engineers NMX Mexican Standards (Voluntary) BAT Best available technology NOM Official Mexican Standard (Mandatory) BTU British thermal unit ODS Ozone Depleting Substances CEER Combined Energy Efficiency Ratio OECD Organization of Economic Coordination CONUEE National Commission for Efficient Use and Development of Energy OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer COP Coefficient of Performance PTAC Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner DOE Department of Energy PTHP Packaged Terminal Heat Pump eCFR Electric Code of Federal Regulations RAC Refrigeration and Air Conditioning EEI Energy Efficiency Index RT Refrigeration Ton EER Energy Efficiency Ratio SAT System of Tributary Administration EU European Union SCOP Seasonal Coefficient of Performance FIDE Electric Power Savings Trust Fund SCT Ministry of Communication and GHGs Greenhouse Gases Transportation GWP Global Warming Potential SEER Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio HCs Hydrocarbons SEMARNAT Ministry of Environment and Natural HCFCs Hydrochlorofluorocarbons Resources HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons SENER Ministry of Energy HFOs Hydrofluorolefins SEPR Seasonal Energy Performance Ratio HP Heat Pump STPS Ministry of Work and Social Welfare HVAC Heating, Ventilation and Air USA United States of America Conditioning RAC Refrigeration and Air Conditioning IEER Integrated Energy Efficiency Ratio VRF Variable refrigerant flow KA Kigali Amendment W Watts kW Kilowatts We Electrical Watts kWh Kilowatt hour Wth Thermal Watts 3
Table of Contents Executive summary.............................................................................................................. 6 1. Analysis of existing national and international standards for large systems in the RAC sector.................................................................................. 7 1.1 Energy efficiency RAC standards in the U. S. 1.1.1 eCFR................................................................................................................. 7 1.1.2 EnergyStar...................................................................................................... 12 1.1.3 ASHRAE 90.1.................................................................................................. 14 1.2 Energy efficiency RAC standards in the EU............................................................. 14 1.2.1 Ecodesign....................................................................................................... 14 1.2.2 Energy labeling............................................................................................... 16 1.3 Energy efficiency RAC standards in Japan.............................................................. 17 1.4 International safety standards regarding HCs........................................................ 21 1.5 Standards for RAC in Mexico.................................................................................. 23 1.5.1 Official Mexican standards (NOMs)................................................................ 23 1.5.2 FIDE labeling................................................................................................... 23 1.5.3 Energy efficiency standards for AC in Mexico................................................ 24 1.5.4 Mexican safety standards for RAC equipment manufacturing....................... 30 1.6 Mexican official standards regulating HCs as refrigerants...................................... 32 4
2. Large state-of-the-art systems in the global market (conventional refrigerants)........ 32 2.1 Expected AC demand growth................................................................................. 32 2.2 Market drivers........................................................................................................ 37 2.2.1 Growing population and urbanization........................................................... 37 2.2.2 Technical improvements due to government regulations and legislations.... 37 2.2.3 Decreasing component prices........................................................................ 37 2.3 State-of-the-art technologies................................................................................. 37 2.3.1 Self-contained air conditioners...................................................................... 37 2.3.2 Split residential air conditioners..................................................................... 39 2.3.3 Split commercial air conditioners................................................................... 42 2.3.4 Ducted split residential air conditioners........................................................ 42 2.3.5 Commercial ducted splits............................................................................... 43 2.3.6 Rooftop ducted.............................................................................................. 44 2.3.7 Multi-splits..................................................................................................... 46 2.3.8 AC chillers....................................................................................................... 48 2.3.9 Heat pumps.................................................................................................... 49 3. Technologies with natural refrigerants in the global market (HC)................................ 53 3.1 Global warming contribution................................................................................. 53 3.2 Development of low-GWP AC systems................................................................... 54 3.2.1 Low-GWP AC systems..................................................................................... 54 3.2.2 Energy efficiency and cooling capacity in alternative AC systems.................. 56 3.3 Available AC technologies with HCs....................................................................... 60 3.3.1 Mini-splits....................................................................................................... 60 3.3.2 AC chillers....................................................................................................... 61 3.3.3 Barriers identified........................................................................................... 62 4. Final remarks................................................................................................................. 63 References.......................................................................................................................... 65 5
Executive summary Regulations are one of the main drivers to increase Section 1 of the report outlines the relevant stan- energy efficiency in different countries. Mexico is not dards in Mexico. It includes the current regulations the exception. published by the Government of Mexico. The study also reviews the United States, European Union, and One of the main factors that regulate the use of Japan regulations, since these are the main commer- refrigeration and air conditioning (RAC) equipment cial partners, and they are leading regions in ener- are the Official Mexican Standards (NOMs). All the gy-efficient RAC equipment. equipment marketed in the country is required to comply with the NOMs. Manufacturers, distributors, Section 2 presents the typical AC equipment charac- and suppliers are all involved, so that end users can teristics, efficiency levels, configuration, and instal- only buy regulated equipment. lation together with other details associated with the direct expansion systems using HFC refrigerants Mexican regulations seem to be highly influenced and other systems using refrigerants with high-GWP. by the regulations of its main trading partners. This Section 2 also specifies the most relevant features of trend contributes to a dynamic regulation in respon- refrigeration and freezing equipment. se to these markets’ demand. However, the Mexican market has its own characteristics and needs that Section 3 overviews efficient technologies for each must also be considered. category and highlights equipment with inverter compressors, intelligent control systems, and Energy-efficient air conditioning (AC) systems reduce high-performance heat exchangers as props for im- power consumption, which reduces indirect emissi- proving energy efficiency, including saving potential ons and mitigates global warming. This is in line with for each new technology or improvement compared the intentions of the recently ratified Kigali Amend- to conventional systems. The analysis of future tech- ment, whose objectives are to reduce the impact nologies that in the medium and long-term will have of refrigerants on global warming. Energy efficiency greater development and gradually displace direct represents a significant opportunity area since about expansion systems was given particular attention. 75 % of the emissions associated with AC equipment are due to the electricity to power the devices. 6
1. Analysis of existing national and international standards for large systems in the RAC sector Standards are developed at international, regional, the greatest impact and influence on the Mexican national, and other levels by a variety of organiza- market. Given that the report is aimed at promoting tions. The organizations are independent of govern- new AC technologies with refrigerant grade hydro ments, industry, associations, and the private sector. carbons (HCs), the analysis will focus on this sector. Equipment with cooling capacities greater than For this analysis, a review of the main international 65,000 BTU / h will be considered large equipment and national standards related to large RAC equip- according to Mexican standards. Most of the existing ment has been carried out. At the international level, standards are related to energy efficiency; however, the cases of the U. S., the EU, and Japan have been the report also presents a specific section focused on considered, as they are the countries or regions with HCs. 1.1 Energy efficiency RAC standards in the U. S. The report identified three groups of standards in source (e.g., electric or gas), and which have the the U. S. that have an important influence on the same or comparable compressors, same or compa- Mexican market: rable heat exchangers, and same or comparable air 1. The Minimum Energy Performance Standards moving systems that have a cooling capacity within (MEPS) for refrigerators and air conditioners, 300 BTU / h of one another. which specify the minimum energy performance Small, large, and very large air-cooled commercial level that appliances, lighting, and electrical packaged AC and heating equipment means all units equipment (products) must meet or exceed befo- manufactured by one manufacturer within a single re they can be offered for sale or for commercial equipment class, having the same or comparably purposes. These are established in the Electronic performing compressor(s), heat exchangers, and air Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). moving system(s) that have a common “nominal” 2. EnergyStar, the compliance label for superior cooling capacity. energy efficiency. 3. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Single packaged vertical units mean all units manu- Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 90.1, which factured by one manufacturer within a single equip- includes standards for efficient buildings and ment class, having the same primary energy source typically is the reference used by developers and (e.g., electric or gas), and which have the same or designers to integrate energy-efficient features comparably performing compressor(s), heat exch- into commercial buildings in Mexico. angers, and air moving system(s) that have a rated cooling capacity within 1500 BTU / h of one another. The main standards analyzed are presented through the next sections: Variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems mean all units manufactured by one manufacturer within a single equipment class, having the same primary 1.1.1 eCFR energy source (e.g., electric or gas), and which have Subpart F-Commercial Air Conditioners and Heat the same or comparably performing compressor(s) Pumps (U. S. Government, 2020) specifies test that have a common “nominal” cooling capacity and procedures and energy conservation standards for the same heat rejection medium (e.g., air or water) commercial air conditioners and heat pumps. The fol- (includes VRF water source heat pumps). lowing definitions apply for the equipment included Commercial packaged AC and heating equipment in the analysis of subpart F: means air-cooled, water-cooled, evaporatively- Packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) or pack- cooled, or water source (not including groundwater aged terminal heat pump (PTHP) means all units source) electrically operated, unitary central air con- manufactured by one manufacturer within a single ditioners, and central AC heat pumps for commercial equipment class, having the same primary energy application. 7
Double-duct air conditioner or heat pump means c) If it is a horizontal unit, a complete unit has a air-cooled commercial packaged AC and heating maximum height of 35 inches; (ii) If it is a vertical equipment that: unit, a complete unit has a maximum depth of 35 a) It Is either a horizontal single packaged or split inches; and system unit, or a vertical unit that consists of two d) Has a rated cooling capacity greater than or equal components that may be shipped or installed to 65,000 BTU / h and up to 300,000 BTU / h. either connected or split; Energy efficiency ratio (EER) means the ratio of the b) It is intended for indoor installation with ducting produced cooling effect of an air conditioner or heat of outdoor air from the building exterior to and pump to its network input, expressed in BTU / watt- from the unit, as evidenced by the unit and / or hour. all of its components being no-weatherized, including the absence of any marking (or listing) Integrated energy efficiency ratio (IEER) means a indicating compliance with UL 1995, “Heating and weighted average calculation of mechanical cooling Cooling Equipment” (UL 1995, 2015), or any other EERs determined for four load levels and correspon- equivalent requirements for outdoor use; ding rating conditions; it is expressed in BTU / watt- hour. TABLE 1: Efficiencies for large commercial AC equipment – eCFR Compliance date: EQUIPMENT Cooling Sub Efficiency Heating type Equipment TYPE capacity category level manufactured starting on: Electric Resistan- IEER = 12.9 January 1, 20181 ce Heating or IEER = 14.8 January 1, 2023 No Heating AC Small Commercial All Other Types IEER = 12.7 January 1, 20181 ≥ 65,000 Packaged Air Condi- of Heating IEER = 14.6 January 1, 2023 BTU / h and tioning and Heating < 135,000 Equipment (Air-Coo- Electric Resistan- BTU / h IEER = 12.2 January 1, 20181 led) ce Heating or IEER = 14.1 January 1, 2023 No Heating HP All Other Types IEER = 12.0 January 1, 20181 of Heating IEER = 13.9 January 1, 2023 Electric Resistan- IEER = 12.4 January 1, 20181 ce Heating or IEER = 14.2 January 1, 2023 No Heating AC Large Commercial All Other Types IEER = 12.2 January 1, 20181 ≥ 135,000 Packaged Air Condi- of Heating IEER = 14.0 January 1, 2023 BTU / h and tioning and Heating < 240,000 Equipment (Air-Coo- Electric Resistan- BTU / h IEER = 11.6 January 1, 20181 led) ce Heating or IEER = 13.5 January 1, 2023 No Heating HP All Other Types IEER = 11.4 January 1, 20181 of Heating IEER = 13.3 January 1, 2023 8
Compliance date: EQUIPMENT Cooling Sub Efficiency Heating type Equipment TYPE capacity category level manufactured starting on: Electric Resistan- IEER = 11.6 January 1, 20181 ce Heating or IEER = 13.2 January 1, 2023 No Heating AC Very Large Commer- All Other Types IEER = 11.4 January 1, 20181 ≥ 240,000 cial Packaged Air of Heating IEER = 13.0 January 1, 2023 BTU / h and Conditioning and < 760,000 Heating Equipment Electric Resistan- BTU / h IEER = 10.6 January 1, 20181 (Air-Cooled) ce Heating or IEER = 12.5 January 1, 2023 No Heating HP All Other Types IEER = 10.4 January 1, 20181 of Heating IEER = 12.3 January 1, 2023 Electric Resistan- ce Heating or EER = 11.2 January 1, 2010 No Heating AC Small Double-Duct All Other Types ≥ 65,000 EER = 11.0 January 1, 2010 Commercial Packa- of Heating BTU / h and ged Air Conditioning < 135,000 and Heating Equip- Electric Resistan- BTU / h ment (Air-Cooled) ce Heating or EER = 11.0 January 1, 2010 No Heating HP All Other Types EER = 10.8 January 1, 2010 of Heating Electric Re- sistance Heating EER = 11.0 January 1, 2010 or No Heating AC Large Commercial All Other Types ≥ 135,000 EER = 10.8 January 1, 2010 Double-Duct Packa- of Heating BTU / h and ged Air Conditioning < 240,000 and Heating Equip- Electric Re- BTU / h ment (Air-Cooled) sistance Heating EER = 10.6 January 1, 2010 or No Heating HP All Other Types EER = 10.4 January 1, 2010 of Heating 1 And manufactured before January 1, 2023. 9
Compliance date: EQUIPMENT Cooling Sub Efficiency Heating type Equipment TYPE capacity category level manufactured starting on: Electric Re- sistance Heating EER = 10.0 January 1, 2010 or No Heating AC Very Large Doub- All Other Types le-Duct Commer- ≥ 240,000 EER = 9.8 January 1, 2010 of Heating cial Packaged Air BTU / h and Conditioning and < 300,000 Electric Re- Heating Equipment BTU / h sistance Heating EER = 9.5 January 1, 2010 (Air-Cooled) or No Heating HP All Other Types EER = 9.3 January 1, 2010 of Heating Packaged Terminal > 15,000 Air Conditioners AC All EER = 9.5 October 7, 2017 BTU / h and Heat Pumps ≥ 65,000 BTU / h and AC & HP All EER = 10.0 October 9, 2015 Single Package < 135,000 Vertical Air Condi- Btu / h tioners and Single Package Vertical ≥ 135,000 Heat Pumps BTU / h and AC & HP All EER = 10.0 October 9, 2016 < 240,000 Btu / h No Heating or ≥ 65,000 Electric Re- EER = 11.2 January 1, 2010 BTU / h and sistance Heating AC < 135,000 BTU / h All Other Types EER = 11.0 January 1, 2010 of Heating No Heating or Variable Refrigerant ≥ 135,000 Electric Re- EER = 11.0 January 1, 2010 Flow Multi-split BTU / h and sistance Heating AC Air Conditioners < 240,000 (Air-cooled) BTU / h All Other Types EER = 10.8 January 1, 2010 of Heating No Heating or ≥ 240,000 Electric Re- EER = 10.0 January 1, 2010 BTU / h and sistance Heating AC < 760,000 BTU / h All Other Types EER = 9.8 January 1, 2010 of Heating 10
Compliance date: EQUIPMENT Cooling Sub Efficiency Heating type Equipment TYPE capacity category level manufactured starting on: No Heating or ≥ 65,000 Electric Re- EER = 11.0 January 1, 2010 BTU / h and sistance Heating HP < 135,000 BTU / h All Other Types EER = 10.8 January 1, 2010 of Heating No Heating or Variable Refrigerant ≥ 135,000 Electric Re- EER = 10.6 January 1, 2010 Flow Multi-split BTU / h and sistance Heating HP Heat Pumps < 240,000 (Air-cooled) BTU / h All Other Types EER = 10.4 January 1, 2010 of Heating No Heating or ≥ 240,000 Electric Re- EER = 9.5 January 1, 2010 BTU / h and sistance Heating HP < 760,000 BTU / h All Other Types EER = 9.3 January 1, 2010 of Heating Source: based on eCFR. As for the commercial air conditioners above, the It is important to notice that the minimum IEER in eCFR includes many groups to set the minimum air-cooled commercial packaged AC and heating performance energy standards. equipment will be enhanced starting in 2023, and it will be set over 14. 11
1.1.2 EnergyStar EnergyStar (EnergyStar, 2020) is the government specific technologies. In small air-cooled central air compliance label for the best energy efficiency conditioners, the IEER is over 4 Wth / We (in the table performance in the U. S.. There is an extensive list of 13.8 BTU / Wh), while large air-cooled central air domestic and commercial appliances and includes conditioners require an IEER higher than 3.8 Wth / We. electrical equipment and combustion equipment. Small AC systems have higher efficiency require- ments than large systems. A similar situation occurs The specification for commercial heating, ventilati- with heat pumps; heat pumps with a lower cooling on, and air conditioning (HVAC) in EnergyStar is an capacity require a higher minimum efficiency. important reference for superior performance in TABLE 2: Energy requirements for commercial HVAC systems in EnergyStar EQUIPMENT Cooling Heating Minimum Energy TYPE capacity Section Type Efficiency Criteria Electric Resistance ≥ 65,000 BTU / h 12.2 EER; 14.0 IEER Small Air-Cooled Central (or None) Air Conditioner < 135,000 BTU / h All other 12.0 EER; 13.8 IEER Electric Resistance 12.2 EER; 13.2 IEER Large Air-Cooled Central ≥ 135,000 BTU / h – (or None) Air Conditioner < 240,000 BTU/h All other 12.0 EER; 13.0 IEER 11.8 EER; 12.8 IEER; Electric Resistance (or None) 3.4 COP2 at 47°F; 2.4 COP at 17°F ≥ 65,000 BTU / h – Small Air-Cooled Heat Pump < 135,000 BTU/h 11.6 EER; 12.6 IEER; All other 3.4 COP at 47°F; 2.4 COP at 17°F 10.9 EER; 12.0 IEER; Electric Resistance (or None) 3.3 COP at 47°F; 2.1 COP at 17°F ≥ 135,000 BTU / h – Large Air-Cooled Heat Pump < 240,000 BTU/h 10.7 EER; 11.8 IEER; All other 3.3 COP at 47°F; 2.1 COP at 17°F 2 COP, means the ratio of the produced cooling effect of an air conditioner or heat pump (or its produced heating effect, depending on the mode of operation) to its net work input, when both the cooling (or heating) effect 12
EQUIPMENT Cooling Heating Minimum Energy TYPE capacity Section Type Efficiency Criteria ≥ 65,000 BTU / h – VRF Air-Cooled Air Conditioner All 12.0 EER; 17.4 IEER < 135,000 BTU / h ≥ 135,000 BTU / h – VRF Air-Cooled Air Conditioner All 12.0 EER; 16.4 IEER < 240,000 Btu/h Without Heat 11.8 EER; 17.4 IEER; ≥ 65,000 BTU / h Recovery 3.4 COP at 47°F VRF Air-Cooled Heat Pump With Heat 11.6 EER; 17.2 IEER; < 135,000 BTU / h Recovery 3.4 COP at 47°F Without Heat 10.9 EER; 16.4 IEER; ≥ 135,000 BTU / h – Recovery 3.3 COP at 47°F VRF Air-Cooled Heat Pump With Heat 10.7 EER; 16.2 IEER; < 240,000 BTU / h Recovery 3.3 COP at 47°F Source: based on EnergyStar. Note the energy efficiency required for variable ref- The specification for heat pumps in EnergyStar rigerant air conditioners. The biggest IEER is required requires a minimum SEER3 of 15 (BTU / Wh), equiva- for air conditioners with a capacity < 135,000 BTU. lent to 4.4 Wth / We. The same value is required for VRF air-cooled air conditioners and VRF air-cooled central air conditioners, either split system or single heat pumps require 17.4 BTU / Wh as IEER (equiva- packaged. If we refer to the efficiency in EER, the lent to 5.1 Wth / We). value tends to be lower than the SEER. EnergyStar establishes at least 10 % more energy efficiency for room-type air conditioners than the minimum federal government standards (eCFR). TABLE 3: Energy requirements for central air conditioners in EnergyStar EQUIPMENT Specification (BTU / Wh) ≥ 8.5 HSPF / ≥ 15 SEER / ≥ 12.5 Split Systems EER Air Source HP Single package ≥ 8.2 HSPF / ≥ 15 SEER / ≥ 12 EER Split Systems ≥ 15 SEER / ≥ 12.5 EER Central AC Single package ≥ 15 SEER / ≥ 12 EER 3 SEER means the total cooling output of a central air conditioner or central air-conditioning heat pump, expressed in BTUs, during its normal annual usage period for cooling and divided by the total electric power input, expressed in watt-hours, during the same period. 13
1.1.3 ASHRAE 90.1 ASHRAE 90.1 is one of the best references for energy The minimum performance in the ASHRAE code performance in RAC for commercial buildings. The reflects the systems’ typical performance. The graph most recent version is ASHRAE 90.1 2019 (ASHRAE, shows that for the split technology, the efficiency 2019). The standard contains a complete classificati- decreases when the cooling capacity increases. This on of air conditioners, including all types of techno- means that it is better to install small capacities to logy and cooling / heating capacity. The main tables get the best energy performance. referred to AC systems are shown below: In contrast, for central systems, the efficiency increa- • electronically operated unitary air conditioners ses with more capacity, particularly for water chillers. and condensing units As for central air conditioners, it could be preferable • electrically operated unitary and applied heat to install equipment with higher capacity, but it pumps depends on the building’s cooling demand. As for • water chilling packages Figure 1: Minimum EER room air conditioners, we observe the same trend as by AC technology (without inverter equipment) in split air conditioners, higher cooling capacity and • electrically operated packaged terminal air con- lower energy efficiency. ditioners, packaged terminal heat pumps, single packaged vertical air conditioners, single packa- ged vertical heat pumps, room air conditioners, and room air conditioner heat pumps FIGURE 1: Minimum EER by AC technology (without inverter equipment) Source (AHRAE, 2019) The cooling capacity increases from left to right in each technology 1.2 Energy efficiency RAC standards in the EU There are two main instruments in the European Uni- 1.2.1 Ecodesign on to reduce energy consumption through minimum The EU legislation on Ecodesign (European Commis- energy efficiency requirements in equipment, energy sion, 2017) is an effective tool for improving energy labeling (comparative label) and Ecodesign (MEPS). efficiency. It eliminates the least performing products 14
from the market, significantly contributing to the yearly energy consumption of the home refrigerator EU’s 2020 energy efficiency objective (European multiplied by 100. Commission, 2014). Requirements of minimum energy efficiency for air The European Commission requires a maximum conditioners are related to technology, cooling capa- energy efficiency index (EEI) for refrigerators, which city, and the refrigerant’s global warming power. The results from the ratio between the home refrigera- main requirements in performance are established tor’s annual energy consumption and the standard for systems with higher GWP. TABLE 4: Requirements for minimum energy efficiency – Ecodesign AIR CONDITIONERS, EXCEPT DOUBLE AND DOUBLE DUCT SINGLE DUCT SINGLE DUCT AIR AIR CONDITIONERS AIR CONDITIONERS CONDITIONERS SCOP (heating SEER season: EERrated COPrated EERrated COPrated Average) If GWP of refrigerant 4.60 3.80 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.04 > 150 for < 6 kW If GWP of refrigerant 4.14 3.42 2.34 2.34 2,34 1.84 ≤ 150 for < 6 kW If GWP of refrigerant 4.30 3.80 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.04 > 150 for 6-12 kW If GWP of refrigerant 3.87 3.42 2.34 2.34 2.34 1.84 ≤ 150 for 6-12 kW Source: European Commission, 2017 Large AC capacities are regulated by the Commission Regulation (EU) 2016 / 2281 (European Commission, 2016), which establishes minimum seasonal energy performance ratio (the ratio between the annual refrigera- tion demand and the annual electricity consumption). Higher requirements are set to water-cooled equipment with the highest capacities. TABLE 5: (2018-2021) seasonal energy performance ratio of high temperature process chillers HEAT TRANSFER MEDIUM AT THE MINIMUM RATED REFRIGERATION CAPACITY CONDENSING SIDE SEPR VALUE PA < 400 kW 4,5 Air PA ≥ 400 kW 5.0 PA < 400 kW 6.5 Water 400 kW ≤ PA < 1 500 kW 7.5 PA ≥ 1 500 kW 8.0 Source: European Commission, 2016 15
Many energy efficiencies for central cooling systems cannot be compared with the Mexican standards because the EU uses minimum seasonal space cooling efficiency to express the equipment efficiency. TABLE 6: Minimum seasonal space cooling energy efficiency of cooling products, expressed in % ηs,c 4 Air-to-water chillers with rated cooling capacity < 400 kW when driven by an electric motor 149 Air-to-water chillers with rated cooling capacity ≥ 400 kW when driven by an electric motor 161 Water / brine to-water chillers with rated cooling capacity < 400 kW when driven 196 by an electric motor Water / brine to-water chillers with ≥ 400 kW rated cooling capacity < 1 500 kW when driven 227 by an electric motor Water / brine to-water chillers with rated cooling capacity ≥ 1 500 kW when driven by an 245 electric motor Air-to-water comfort chillers, when driven by an internal combustion engine 144 Air-to-air air conditioners, driven by an electric motor, except rooftop air conditioners 181 Rooftop air conditioners 117 Air-to-air air conditioners, driven by an internal combustion engine 157 Source: European Commission, 2016 1.2.2 Energy labeling EU energy labels help consumers choose energy-ef- FIGURE 2: ficient products. Products are currently labeled on Energy labeling example. a scale of A+++ (most efficient) to G (least efficient). Cooling-only air conditioners However, due to the development of more and more classified in energy efficiency energy-efficient products, products will be gradually classes A to G relabeled with the more straightforward A to G scale (European Commission, 2020). The label content depends on the product, typically includes the type of product, class energy, power, energy efficiency, Source: European Commission, 2000 energy consumption, and other info as the noise level. 4 Seasonal space cooling energy efficiency’ (ηs,c ) means the ratio between the reference annual cooling demand pertaining to the cooling season covered by a cooling product, and the annual energy consumption for cooling, corrected by contributions accounting for temperature control and the electricity consumption of ground water pump(s), where applicable, expressed in % 16
Like Ecodesign standard, Energy Label establishes The SEER for the best energy performance in air minimum energy efficiency indexes for every refrige- conditioners (without ducts) is ≥ 8.5 (table 8). rator class in the comparative label. It can be noticed that there is a considerable difference between the most efficient equipment and the least efficient refrigerator. TABLE 7: Energy efficiency classes and EEI, TABLE 8: Energy efficiency classes for air conditioners, Energy label-EU except double ducts and single ducts, Energy Label, EU ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY SEER SCOP EFFICIENCY EFFICIENCY EFFICIENCY CLASS (Wth / We) (Wth / We) CLASS INDEX A+++ (most efficient) EEI < 22 A+++ SEER ≥ 8,50 SCOP ≥ 5,10 A++ 22 ≤ EEI < 33 A++ 6,10 ≤ SEER < 8,50 4,60 ≤ SCOP < 5,10 A+ 33 ≤ EEI < 42 A+ 5,60 ≤ SEER < 6,10 4,00 ≤ SCOP < 4,60 A 42 ≤ EEI < 55 A 5,10 ≤ SEER < 5,60 3,40 ≤ SCOP < 4,00 B 55 ≤ EEI < 75 B 4,60 ≤ SEER < 5,10 3,10 ≤ SCOP < 3,40 C 75 ≤ EEI < 95 C 4,10 ≤ SEER < 4,60 2,80 ≤ SCOP < 3,10 D 95 ≤ EEI < 110 D 3,60 ≤ SEER < 4,10 2,50 ≤ SCOP < 2,80 E 110 ≤ EEI < 125 E 3,10 ≤ SEER < 3,60 2,20 ≤ SCOP < 2,50 F 125 ≤ EEI < 150 F 2,60 ≤ SEER < 3,10 1,90 ≤ SCOP < 2,20 G (least efficient) EEI ≥ 150 G SEER < 2,60 SCOP < 1,90 Source: European Commission, 2020 Source: European Commission, 2016 1.3 Energy efficiency RAC standards in Japan Japan decided to introduce the Top Runner method standards; display items; and energy efficiency for determining energy consumption efficiency measurement methods. Items needed for judgment standards in machinery, equipment, and other items. standards include target categories, target fiscal year, It consists of a maximum standard value system (Top target values, and achievement evaluation methods. Runner program). The approach sets targets based There are two labels associated with The Top Runner on the value of the most energy-efficient equipment program: Energy Saving Label for manufacturers and on the market when the requirements were establis- Uniform Energy Saving Label for retailers. hed. The program was introduced in 1998. In 2000 the Energy Saving Label was introduced to The Top Runner program (METI, 2015) establishes promote the popularization of highly efficient machi- requirements by considering potential technological nery, equipment, and other items that have achieved improvements added as efficiency improvements. Top Runner requirements through manufacturers’ It comprises targeted machinery, equipment, and efforts. other item ranges; items necessary for judgment 17
FIGURE 3: Energy Saving Label in Japan FIGURE 4: Uniform Energy Saving Label in Japan Source: Meti, 2015 The Energy Saving Label presents a logo with an e (energy saving symbol) inscribed in a green circle when the equipment meets the requirements and in an orange circle when it does not reach the requi- rements. Also, the label includes an energy saving standard achievement rate (as %), the target fiscal year, and the energy consumption as an index, e. g., annual energy consumption. Source: Meti, 2015 Retailers have to provide energy information about the products they sell in their shops with the Uni- The Uniform Energy Saving Label for air conditioners form Energy Saving Label, which contains a multis- and electric refrigerators includes the expected an- tage rating with stars (five stars to set the energy nual electricity bill, and the multistage rating system. savings, more savings more colored stars), expected annual electricity bill (which helps the customer to For most of the equipment within the Top Runner compare a piece of equipment with other similar program scope, the overall results have far exceeded devices and allows to estimate the payback period in the initial expectations. However, this is not the case substitution case), manufacturer name and model, for AC equipment. fiscal year and additional information, e.g., type of Top Runner standards establish a singular parameter refrigerant in refrigerators. to set the residential AC units energy efficiency: TABLE 9: Top Runner program results by AC product category Energy Efficiency PRODUCT Energy Efficiency improvement CATEGORY improvement result (initial expectation) Non-ducted wall mounted AC units, 16.3 % (FY 2005 – FY 2010) 22.4 % 4 kW or less Non-ducted / wall mounted AC units, AC 15.6 % (FY 2005 – FY 2010) 17.8 % over 4 kW Other than non-ducted / wall moun- 15.9 % (FY 2005 – FY 2010) 13.6 % ted AC units Source: Meti, 2015 18
the annual performance factor (APF). The APF is a non-ducted wall-hung type and other non-ducted numerical value calculated by the JIS C9612 method type perform similarly. Therefore, the most ener- (Japanese Standards Association, 2005). The APF is gy-efficient home air conditioners are AC split units the ratio of thermal energy supplied by the AC unit smaller than 4 kW for non-ducted wall-hung type to the electricity required to operate the unit for and smaller than 3.2 kW for equipment other than one year. The APF could be the equivalent of the non-ducted. In the multi-split systems, the APF does SEER. The best performance is in the smaller units, not change regardless of the cooling capacity. TABLE 10: Top Runner program results by AC system category CATEGORY Standard energy consumpti on efficiency Category UNIT FORM Cooling capacity (APF) name Over 4.0 kW up to 5.0 kW E 5.5 Non-ducted wall-hung type (except multi-type controlling operation of Over 5.0 kW up to 6.3 kW F 5.0 indoor units individually) Over 6.3 kW up to 28.0 kW G 4.5 Up to 3.2 kW H 5.2 Other non-ducted type (except multi-type controlling operation of Over 3.2 kW up to 4.0 kW I 4.8 indoor units individually) Over 4.0 kW up to 28.0 kW J 4.3 Up to 4.0 kW K 5.4 Multi-type controlling operation of Over 4.0 kW up to 7.1 kW L 5.4 indoor units individually Over 7.1 kW up to 28.0 kW M 5.4 Source: Meti, 2015 Since 2015, commercial AC equipment has to comply are more efficient. Note that the standard includes with energy consumption efficiency E or equivalent equipment with cooling capacities up to 28 kW according to the calculation formula. E looks like the (95,540 BTU / h, 8 refrigeration tons) so that the Top APF for residential AC; it refers to the yearly energy Runner program does not cover bigger AC equipment consumption efficiency. The cooling capacity also has for the commercial sector. an impact on energy efficiency: smaller capacities 19
TABLE 11: Top Runner program results by AC product category CATEGORY STANDARD ENERGY CONSUMP TION EFFICIENCY Indoor Category OR CALCULATION UNIT FORM Cooling capacity FORMULA THEREOF unit type name Less than 3.6 kW aa E = 6.0 Not less than 3.6 kW ab E = 6.0 – 0.083 × (A – 3.6) but less than 10.0 kW 4-directional cassette type Not less than 10.0 kW ac E = 6.0 – 0.12 × (A – 10) but less than 20.0 kW Combination of Not less than 20.0 kW ad E = 5.1 – 0.060 × (A – 20) plural types or and up to 28.0 kW any type other than following Less than 3.6 kW ae E = 5.1 Not less than 3.6 kW af E = 5.1 – 0.083 × (A – 3.6) but less than 10.0 kW Other than 4-directional Not less than 10.0 kW cassette type ag E = 5.1 – 0.10 × (A – 10) but less than 20.0 kW Not less than 20.0 kW ah E = 4.3 – 0.050 × (A – 20) and up to 28.0 kW Less than 10.0 kW ai E = 5.7 Not less than 10.0 kW aj E = 5.7 – 0.11 × (A – 10) Multi-type cont- but less than 20.0 kW rolling o peration of indoor units Not less than 20.0 kW ak E = 5.7 – 0.065 × (A – 20) individually but less than 40.0 kW Not less than 40.0 kW al E = 4.8 – 0.040 × (A – 40) and up to 50.4 kW Less than 20.0 kW am E = 4.9 Non-ducted Ducted type whose type Not less than 20.0 kW an E = 4.9 indoor unit is set and up to 28.0 kW on floor or any Less than 20.0 kW ao E = 4.7 like type Ducted type Not less than 20.0 kW ap E = 4.7 and up to 28.0 kW Source: Meti, 2015 Remarks: 1. “Ducted type” indicates systems connected to ducts at the outlet. 2. “Multi-type” indicates a type that has two or more indoor units connected to an outdoor unit. 3. E and A represent the following values, respectively. E: Standard energy consumption efficiency (unit: yearly energy consumption energy efficiency); A: Cooling capacity (unit: kilowatts) 20
1.4 International safety standards regarding HCs RAC safety standards address a wide range of ha- by RAC safety standards that are affected by the zards associated with this kind of systems. Table 12 refrigerant choice. provides a summary of the important topics handled TABLE 12: General technical obligations under safety standards for RAC systems CATEGORY IEC 60335-2-24 IEC 60335-2-89 IEC 60335-2-40 ISO 5149-1, -2, -3, -4 EN 60335-2-24 EN 60335-2-89 EN 60335-2-40 EN 378-1, -2, -3, -4 Plug-in commercial Factory-made whole All commercial and Domestic refrigera- appliances and air conditioners, industrial refrigeration, Scope tors, freezers and cabinets with a heat pumps, dehu- air conditioning and heat ice makers condensing unit and midifiers and partial pump systems single units Approx. 1 kg of HC in a direct system 1 kg, 1.5 kg, 5 kg, 10 kg, Limits on 150 g flammable 150 g flammable inside (depending 25 kg of HC and no limit, refrigerant charge refrigerant refrigerant upon room size) depending upon type of amount and 5 kg outside or system and / or room size special enclosure Marking Requires flammability or high pressure warning symbols, as appropriate Strength p ressure Specifies pressure tests for systems and components (where applicable) Electrical Refers to appropriate Specifies design, construction and test requirements equipment standards Sources of Describes what to consider and how to avoid a potential source of ignition, including a test ignition method option (applies to all these standards except ISO 5149) Information & Details concerning the installation, use, service, maintenance, and disposal of the equipment instructions so that users, operators and technicians are aware of how to handle flammability hazards Systems generally have to be constructed as “sealed” or “hermetically sealed” systems if they System tightness are to use flammable refrigerants indoors (e.g., no or limited number of reusable mechanical connections or fittings) Pressure limiting / The need for additional devices to limit or relieve excess pressure may apply to smaller systems relief devices if flammable refrigerants are used Additional components for secondary or indirect circuits (such as those using water or brine) Secondary / are required to vent a leak that has occurred from the evaporator into the secondary circuit if indirect systems the primary refrigerant circuit exceeds a certain charge size Gas sensors may be mandated to initiate mitigation measures such as ventilation, alarms, ter- Gas sensors minating electrical supplies, etc. These may be applicable to systems using flammable refrige- rants in machinery rooms or even for systems in occupied spaces Construction of Machinery rooms or special enclosures may have certain requirements if flammable refrige- machinery rooms rants are used, such as number and opening of doors, fire resistance of walls, tightness and or ventilated minimum airflow rates, etc. enclosure Source: GIZ, 2018 21
Table 12 shows that the refrigerant type can affect is ultimately the most relevant determinant within several design and construction aspects. Accordingly, safety standards for the viability of natural refrige- the requirements might have an impact on the rant applications. This is particularly the case for HCs. systems’ costs, and they are relevant for manufactu- Table 13 summarizes the charge size limits for HCs rers and installers. The refrigerant charge size limit across current safety standards. TABLE 13: Refrigerant charge size limits for HCs according to safety standards for HVAC systems Equipment / application Vertical (60335-2-24, -40, -89) Horizontal (ISO 5149-1, EN 378-1) EQUIPMENT / VERTICAL HORIZONTAL APPLICATION (60335-2-24, -40, -89) (ISO 5149-1, EN 378-1) Maximum charge Allowable charge Maximum charge Allowable charge Domestic refrigeration 0.15 kg 0.15 kg Commercial refrigeration Stand alone 0.15 kg 0.15 kg 1.5 kg 0.008 × Vrm Condensing units 0.15 kg 0.15 kg 1.5 kg 0.008 × Vrm Centralized systems 1.5 kg 0.008 × Vrm Transport refrigeration 1.5 kg; 2.5 kg 1.5 kg; 2.5 kg Large size 2.5, 10, 25 kg, 0.008 × Vrm refrigeration no limit Air conditioner & heat pumps Small 0.3 kg 0.01 × Vrm 0.3 kg 0.01 × Vrm self-contained Mini-split 1 kg 1.5 kg Multi-split 1 kg 1.5 kg Ducted split 1 kg 1.5 kg Ducted commercial 1 kg 1.5 kg Hot water heating 1.5 kg, 5 kg, 10 1 kg, 5 kg 0.04 × h × Arm heat pumps kg, 25 kg, no limit Space heating 1.5 kg, 5 kg, 10 1 kg, 5 kg 0.04 × h × Arm heat pumps kg, 25 kg, no limit Chillers 1.5 kg, 5 kg, 10 Positive displacement 1 kg, 5 kg 1 kg, 5 kg kg, 25 kg, no limit 1.5 kg, 5 kg, 10 Centrifugal kg, 25 kg, no limit Source: GIZ, 2018 where: Vrm = room volume (in m3); Arm= room area (in m2) and = unit installation height (in m) 22
1.5 Standards for RAC in Mexico Mexico has compliance and comparative labels in two FIGURE 6: Simplified FIDE structure types of standards: MEPS and High Energy Perfor- mance Standards. The main instruments are governmental standards: The Official Mexican Standards (NOMs in Mexico) and Voluntary Standards (NMXs in Mexico). Additi- onally, there is an important compliance label, the Electric Power Savings Trust Fund (FIDE) label, which requires a higher energy efficiency than the NOMs in many products. 1.5.1 Official Mexican standards (NOMs) The NOMs include comparative labels that show FIDE is a private trust fund. The trustors are several the minimum energy efficiency required, the equip- chambers of commerce. The trustees are the Federal ment’s energy efficiency, and the percentage of Electricity Commission (CFE) and the final energy energy savings. The label also includes the type of savings beneficiaries. Other partners are the NAFIN equipment, capacity, model, and brand. and a technical committee. FIGURE 5: Example of energy efficiency labeling The FIDE labeling is a badge awarded to companies that manufacture energy saving products or help save energy; in the same way, it benefits diverse sectors such as industries, domestic users, services, and other businesses. There are two types of FIDE labeling, FIDE class A for equipment that directly saves electrical energy due to its high-efficiency and FIDE class B for equipment that helps save energy even though they do not save energy on their own, such as thermal insulation or efficient building materials. FIGURE 7: Energy classes in the FIDE labeling Source: NOM-023-ENER 2018 1.5.2 FIDE labeling FIDE is a private organization with mixed participati- on that seeks to develop and implement actions to promote renewable energy generation and the effi- cient use of electrical power. FIDE’s main objective is to contribute to economic and social development and environment preservation. 23
1.5.3 Energy efficiency standards for AC in conditioner. All these AC standards have mandatory Mexico and voluntary requirements. AC energy efficiency standards in Mexico include The standards focus on the equipment operative NOMs, NMXs, and FIDE labeling. AC standards in system (compressor, evaporative / chiller system, and Mexico cover several technologies: split / multi-split, condensers). Table 14 displays the standards. central (packaged or split), room, and inverter air TABLE 14: Main mandatory and voluntary AC standards in Mexico EQUIPMENT Mandatory Standard Voluntary Standard Split / multi split air conditioner NOM-023-ENER-2018 FIDE 4121 Specification Central air conditioner NOM-011-ENER-2006 FIDE 4116 Specification Room air conditioner NOM-021-ENERSCFI-2017 FIDE 4113 Specification Split-inverter air conditioner NOM-026-ENER-2015 FIDE 4174 Specification There are four mandatory standards for AC equip- Table 15 shows the minimum EER for room air condi- ment. Each of them has a FIDE equivalent complian- tioners according to the NOM-021-ENER / SCFI-2017. ce label with higher standards. FIDE labeling. 4113 Specification. Room-type air NOM-021-ENER / SCFI-2017, Energy efficiency and conditioners user safety requirements in room-type air conditio- This specification is applicable to room air conditi- ners. Boundaries, testing, and labeling methods oner models, without reverse cycle (only cooling) The standard establishes specifications and test me- or with reverse cycle (heating), with and without thods for the combined energy efficiency ratio (CEER) louvered sides, with an air-cooled condenser and ref- and the standby mode, as well as the safety require- rigerant R-22 or an alternative (usually R-410A), with ments and an evaluation method. It also establishes cooling capacity up to 10,600 Watts (36,000 BTU / h). the type of information for the energy efficiency This compliance label was published in 2012, so the label. The standard includes new room-type air con- minimum efficiency values have been a bit outdated. ditioners, with or without heating, with an air-cooled The table shows that NOM-021 ENER / SCFI-2017 condenser, and cooling capacities up to 10,600 Wth efficiency requirements are higher. As a result, the sold in Mexico (local production and imported units). labeling role could become obsolete. As for the air conditioners with heating and cooling in the same device (reverse cycle), the CEER require- ment applies only to the cooling mode. 24
TABLE 15: Minimum CEER for room air conditioners in Mexico TYPE Clase Cooling Capacity Wth CEER Wth / We 1 ≤ 1 758 3.22 2 > 1 758 and ≤ 2 344 3.22 3 > 2 344 and ≤ 4 103 3.19 without reverse cycle and with louvered sides 4 > 4 103 and ≤ 5 806 3.14 5a > 5 861 and ≤ 8 205 2.75 5b > 8205 2.64 6 ≤ 1 758 2.93 7 > 1 758 and ≤ 2 344 2.93 8a > 2 344 and ≤ 3 223 2.81 without reverse cycle and without louvered sides 8b > 3 223 and ≤ 4 103 2.78 9 > 4 103 and ≤ 5 861 2.73 10 > 5 861 2.75 11 ≤ 5 861 2.87 With reverse cycle and louvered sides 13 > 5 861 2.73 12 ≤ 4 103 2.73 With reverse cycle and without louvered sides 14 > 4 103 2.55 Casement only 15 2.78 > 10 600 Casement slider 16 3.05 Source: NOM-021-ENER / SCFI-2017 25
TABLE 16: Minimum energy efficiency for room air conditioners according to FIDE 4113 specification REEC % Over TYPE CLASS Cooling Capacity Wth Wth/We NOM-021 1 ≤ 1,758 3 7% 2 > 1,758 and ≤ 2,344 3.07 5% 3 > 2,344 and ≤ 4,103 3 6% without reverse cycle and with louvered sides 4 > 4,103 and ≤ 5,806 3 4% 5a > 5,861 and ≤ 8,205 2.72 1% 5b > 8,205 2.72 -3 % 6 ≤ 1,758 2.78 5% 7 > 1,758 and ≤ 2,344 2.72 7% without reverse cycle 8a > 2,344 and ≤ 3,223 2.72 3% and without louvered sides 8b > 3,223 and ≤ 4,103 2.72 2% 9 > 4,103 and ≤ 5,861 2.72 0% 10 > 5,861 2.72 1% 11 ≤ 5,861 2.78 3% With reverse cycle and louvered sides 13 > 5,861 2.63 4% 12 ≤ 4,103 2.63 4% With reverse cycle and without louvered sides 14 > 4,103 2.49 2% Source: FIDE 4113 Specification NOM-011-ENER-2006, Energy efficiency in central The standard applies to packaged or split equipment air conditioners, packaged or split. Boundaries, and air-cooled or water-cooled appliances. There is testing, and labeling methods only one SEER in the standard for all type of equip- The standard establishes the minimum level of SEER ment: required for central-type air conditioners. Further, it specifies the methods of proof that they must use to verify such compliance and defines the requirements that should be included in the information label. 26
TABLE 17: SEER for central air conditioners in Mexico FIDE 4116 Specification. Central-type packaged or split air conditioners SEER This specification, published in June 2012, applies COOLING CAPACITY (W) (Wth/We) to central-type air conditioners, packaged or split, without reverse cycle (only cooling) or with reverse 8,800 to 19,050 3.81 cycle (heating), with an air-cooled condenser, with a cooling capacity of 10,540 Watts (36,000 BTU / h) up Source: NOM-011-ENER-2006 to 17,580 Watts (60,000 BTU / h) TABLE 18: Minimum energy performance in central air conditioners for obtaining the FIDE labeling in Mexico % Over Heating mode NOM-011 Cooling capacity SEER TYPE performance (Wth) (Wth/We) (cooling factor (Wth/We) mode) Without inverse cycle 10,540 to 17,850 ≥ 4.10 7.6 % With inverse cycle 10,540 to 17,850 ≥ 4.10 ≥ 2.22 7.6 % Source: FIDE 4116 Specification The 4116 specification requires a higher SEER for NOM-023-ENER-2018, Energy efficiency in split air central air conditioners than the mandatory standard conditioners, free discharge, and without air ducts. (7.6 % more than NOM-011-ENER-2006). Neverthe- Limits, testing method, and labeling less, the last standard update was in 2007; thus, it This standard establishes the minimum EER required should be reviewed again. for split air conditioners, free discharge and without air ducts (mini-split and multi-split), simple cycle TABLE 19: Minimum EER for split air conditioners in (cold only), or with reversible cycle (heat pump), with Mexico air-cooled condensers. The standard excludes inverter air conditioners, COOLING CAPACITY EER Wth/We water-based heat pumps, and portable units. WATTS (BTU/H) (BTU/Wh) ≤ 4 101 (13 993) It is important to note that Mexico cannot regulate 3.37 (11.5) > 4 101 (13 993) and equipment pre-charged with ozone-depleting sub- ≤ 5 859 (19 991.49) stances such as R-22. However, energy efficiency standards such as NOM-023 will reduce the import > 5 859 (19 991,493) and and use of most R-22 mini-splits because it is not 3.31 (11.3) ≤ 10 600 (36 168.26) easy to reach the efficiency required by the standard with R-22. > 10 600 (36 168,26) and 3.28 (11.2) ≤ 19 050 (65 000.5) Source: NOM-023_ENER-2018 27
FIDE 4121 Specification. Split air conditioners The voluntary compliance label was published in January 2012 and includes a much broader classifica- tion than NOM-023. TABLE 20: Minimum energy performance for split air conditioners without inverse cycle CLASS COOLING CAPACITY EER (BTU/Wh) < 3.517 kW < 12,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.02 (10.3) ≥ 3.517 kW and ≥ 12,000 BTU/h and ≥ 3.00 (10.25) ≤ 5.274 kW < 18,000 BTU/h ≥ 5.275 kW y ≥ 18,000 BTU/h and ≥ 3.08 (10.50) < 19.050 kW < 65,000 BTU/h ≥ 7.032 kW (2 ≥ 24,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.02 (10.3) evaporators) ≥ 7.032 kW (3 ≥ 24,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.02 (10.3) evaporators) Wthout inverse cycle (only cooling) ≥ 7.9 kW (3 evapo- ≥ 27,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.02 (10.3) rators) ≥ 10.548 kW (2 ≥ 36,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.00 (10.25) evaporators) ≥ 10.548 kW (3 ≥ 36,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.02 (10.3) evaporators) ≥ 14.067 kW (2x12,000 BTU/h ≥ 48,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.05 (10.40) and 1x24,000 BTU/h evaporators Source: FIDE 4121 specification 28
TABLE 21: Minimum energy performance for split air conditioners with inverse cycle Performance coefficient EER Wth/We (heating) CLASS COOLING CAPACITY (BTU/h) Wth/We (BTU/Wh) < 3.517 kW < 12,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.02 (10.3) ≥ 12,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.517 kW and and < 18,000 ≥ 3.00 (10.25) ≤ 5.274 kW BTU/h ≥ 18,000 BTU/h ≥ 5.275 kW y and < 65,000 ≥ 3.08 (10.50) < 19.050 kW BTU/h ≥ 7.032 kW ≥ 24,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.02 (10.3) (2 evaporators) With inverse cycle ≥ 7.032 kW (3 ≥ 24,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.02 (10.3) (cooling and heating evaporators) 2.72 with heat pump) ≥ 7.9 kW ≥ 27,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.02 (10.3) (3 evaporators) ≥ 10.548 kW ≥ 36,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.00 (10.25) (2 evaporators) ≥ 10.548 kW ≥ 36,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.02 (10.3) (3 evaporators) ≥ 14.067 kW (2 × 12,000 BTU/h ≥ 48,000 BTU/h ≥ 3.05 (10.40) and 1 × 24,000 BTU/h evaporators Source: FIDE 4121 specification The minimum energy efficiencies required in the This NOM applies to split air conditioners with FIDE labeling have been exceeded by the recent inverter technology, operated with electric power, in NOM-023-ENER-2018 update. Now it is neces- nominal cooling capacities of 1 Wth up to 19,050 Wth sary also to update FIDE labeling for splits air that work by mechanical compression and include an conditioners. air-cooled evaporator coil, a frequency compressor NOM-026-ENER-2015 Energy efficiency in split air and / or VRF, and an air-cooled condenser coil. conditioners with VRF (inverter), free discharge, The standard excludes water-based heat pumps, and without air ducts. Boundaries, testing, and portable units, multi-split appliances, among others, labeling methods and establishes four inverter classes according to the cooling capacity. 29
TABLE 22: Minimum energy performance for inverter air conditioners according to FNOM-026-ENER-2015 and FIDE 4174 specification NOM-026- % FIDE 4174 COOLING CAPACITY ENER-2015 Over EER (BTU/Wh) NOM EER (BTU/Wh) < 4 101 W < 13 993 BTU/h 4.68 (16) 4.83 (16.5) 3% > 4 101 W and ≥ 13 993 BTU/h and 4.68 (16) 4.92 (16.80) 5% ≤ 5 859 W ≤ 19 991 BTU/h ≥ 5 859 W and ≥ 19 991 BTU/h and 4.39 (15) 4.83 (16.5) 10 % ≤ 10 600 W ≤ 36 168 BTU/h > 10 600 W and ≥ 36 168 BTU/h and 4.10 (14) 4.30 (14.70) 5% ≤ 19 050 W ≤ 65 005 BTU/h Based on FIDE and NOM-026-ENER-2015 FIDE labeling. 4174 specification. Split air 2. Protection against possible hazards due to exter- conditioners with VRF (inverter) nal influences on the electrical product This labeling specification, from March 2017, inclu- 3. Safe operation des the same categories as the NOM-026. By compa- 4. Usage information and conservation of electrical rison, we observe increments from 3 % in the small products, marking, and labeling capacity to 10 % in the medium capacity inverters. It is applicable to electrical products that consume The specification and the NOM-026 will play an electricity and other energy sources such as bat- essential role in the medium term since it is expected teries, accumulators, and auto-generation, in both that in the next few years, the inverter equipment alternating and continuous current with nominal will increase its presence in the Mexican market so tension of up to 1000 V for alternating current and that it will be necessary to monitor its quality and up to 1500 V for continuous current. energy efficiency closely. NMX-J-521 / 1-ANCE-2012, Household appliances and similar devices – Safety-Part 1: general requi- 1.5.4 Mexican safety standards for RAC equip- rements ment manufacturing This standard specifies the safety features for house- This section presents some safety standards for RAC hold electrical appliances and similar devices, with manufacturing. assigned tension of up to 250 V for single phase appliances and up to 480 V for other devices. NOM-003-SCFI-2014, Electrical products - safety specifications Appliances that are not meant for residential use and might be a hazard for individuals, such as appliances This standard establishes safety features and specifi- designed for unspecialized users in shops, light indus- cations required for electrical products either sold in try, and farms, are included in this standard. Mexico or imported into Mexico. The standard aims to prevent dangerous situations for consumers and NMX-J-521 / 1-ANCE-2014, Safety in household ap- their belongings, avoiding unacceptable risks depen- pliances and similar devices – Part 2-40: particular ding on the product properties when its installation, requirements for heat pumps, air conditioners and conservation, and use match the intended purpose dehumidifiers of the product, according to the following principles: This standard establishes the safety requirements for 1. Protection against possible hazards coming from heat pumps, including those with sanitary type hot the electrical product itself water source; air conditioners; and dehumidifiers 30
You can also read