AI in Staffing: Staffing Owners and leaders - Welcome, and thanks for joining!
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
AI in Staffing: Legal Risks and Considerations Staffing Owners and leaders Welcome, and thanks for joining!
Sheri Tischer VP of Business Development - Staffing Sheri brings to her role at TCI Business Capital over 15 years of front-line staffing experience and has an authentic passion for the industry. She is responsible for developing staffing industry partnerships and driving our payroll funding solutions throughout the nation. Sheri’s leadership experience and understanding of sales, recruiting, and operations in the staffing industry allow her to better assist staffing Owners in getting their financial needs met. She serves on the Board of Directors for the Minnesota Recruiting and Staffing Association. She is a mentor and volunteer for the American Staffing Association, and an active corporate partner with NAWBO-MN.
Learning Objectives: 1. Understand the risk associated with data security & bias with the use of AI 2. Analyze vendors for risks and shifts in liability 3. Strategize on uses of AI for recruiting and candidate suitability
Kate Bischoff Kate Bischoff is an overly enthusiastic, sarcastic, and opinionated management-side employment attorney and human resources professional. She works closely with management, HR folk, and technology companies to improve organizations through training, policy, and investigation work in addition to everyday advice and counseling. Prior to starting her own business, Kate served as the HR Officer for Consulate General Jerusalem and U.S. Embassy Lusaka, Zambia. Kate has been recognized by The New York Times, CNN.com, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, National Public Radio, and other journalistic sources as a leading authority on harassment, technology in the workplace, and employment law.
Artificial Intelligence • HR Tech is a $20 BILLION industry • National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 defines as a “machine-based system that can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make predictions, recommendations or decisions influencing real or virtual environments.” • AI will affect every facet of the employee lifecycle • Potential for new regulations & a new frontier for litigation
AI & Analytic Forms • Text analytics • Audio & video analytics • Usage analytics • Predictive modeling
Use Today • Recruiting: – Analyzing candidate pools – Finding candidates – Background checks • Employee: – Determining productivity – Monitoring for security risks – Determining potential – Compensation analysis – Potential flight risks – Succession planning • Post-employment: – Use of confidential information – Network analysis for solicitation
Problems • Are the factors correlations? – Particularly for machine learning as more learning affects the analysis – What is job-related? • Is the data any good or useful? – “All HR data is bad data” – Contains multitudes of bias – Is the data accurate or complete? • Will we know how it works? – Black boxes? – Ability to test or share it? • How can we verify not biased?
The Law • The law is bad & slow • Discrimination – Disparate treatment doesn’t quite work – Disparate impact doesn’t quite work – Another option? • Privacy – EU & California leading the law on the use of employee data – Allow employees to control their data to a certain extent – If using private data, does the employee/candidate know & give meaningful consent? – Do they understand what it is they are consenting to? – Get around the regulations by anonymizing?
How the Bill of Rights Works • Two-part test: – Automated systems that – Have the potential to meaningfully impact the American public’s rights, opportunities, or access to critical resources or services • Civil rights & liberties • Privacy • Equal opportunities • Critical resources & services
California Consumer Privacy Act • Privacy law designed to ”give agency” to individuals over their own data • Includes data collected by employers • Rights – To know – Opt out of sale or sharing – Opt out of automated decision making – Correction – Deletion – Limit use of sensitive
NYC AI in Employment Decisions • Subject automated employment decision tools to a bias audit within one year of its use • Ensure that the results of such audits are publicly available • Provide particular notices to job candidates regarding the employer’s use of these tools • Allow candidates or employees to potentially request alternative evaluation processes as an accommodation • Enforcement delayed until April 2023
Amazon Example • Amazon is huge into automation • Reviewing resumes/applications is a long, labor- intensive endeavor • Review 100 candidates, spit out the top five • The tool learned Amazon preferred men • Tried to fix this – remove proxies for gender • Still a problem • Scrapped the program in 2018 • Some tech company is trying to do this
Privacy: Illinois AI Interview • Notify applicants that AI will be used in their video interviews. • Explain to applicants how the AI works & what characteristics the AI will be tracking in relation to their fitness for the position. • Obtain the applicant’s consent to use AI to evaluate the candidate. • Only share the video interview with those who have AI expertise needed to evaluate the candidate and must otherwise keep the video confidential. • Employers must comply with an applicant’s request to destroy their interview video within 30 days
HireVue • HireVue is a video-interviewing platform that added AI to conduct analysis on the videos themselves • Word choice, word complexity, facial analysis, eye contact all used as factors to determine candidate rating • Finally, conducted analysis on whether bias could play a part • it did!! • Announcement 1 year after stopped using it
To Ask A Vendor • Has the process demonstrated adverse impact? • What validation evidence has been collected to establish the job relatedness of the algorithm? For each job? • Does the validation evidence comply with the requirements of UGESP? Get a copy of the validation study • Does it use an adverse bias mechanism to test for bias? • What is the data security? • How anonymized? • What kind of ongoing monitoring do you provide as we continue using it? • Contracting: – Vendor provides supervised training – Required to provide information if litigation or agency review occurs – Avoid indemnification language or ask for your org to be indemnified
Takeaways • AI is coming • So are the laws & regulations… eventually • Assess where you’re at right now – What data do you or your vendor have? – How are you using it? – Any AI right this second? – Determine whether to evaluate • Employer is ALWAYS responsible for employment decisions – NOT a vendor
Thank you! Contact Sheri Tischer Contact Kate Bischoff P: (952) 656-3492 P: (320) 249-9269 E: stischer@tcicapital.com E: kate@k8bisch.com Reminder: You can receive CE credits from the American Staffing Association (ASA) or the National Association for Personal Services (NAPS).
You can also read