2021 Fisheries Restoration Grant Program Proposal Solicitation Notice
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
2021 Fisheries Restoration
Grant Program Proposal
Solicitation Notice
N orth Fork of South Fork N oyo Riv er
Ph oto Credit : Pre -Projec t Andrea Garcia (CDFW) and
P o s t - P r o j e c t M i m i C a d d e l l ( A me r i C o r p s W a t e r s h e d S t e w a r d s P r o g r a m )
Application deadline : April 13, 2021
FRGP PSN 2021/2022
C aliforn ia Depa rtmen t of Fish an d Wildlife
E co sy stem Conse rv ation Div isio n
Wate rshed Re sto rat ion Grant s Bra nch
I n pa rtnersh ip wit h
N ationa l O cean ic and Atmo sp heric Adm inist rat ion ’ s
Pa cific Coa sta l S alm on Re cove ry Fu nd
FRGP PSN 2021/2022Overview
T h e C a l i f o r n i a D e p a r t me n t o f F i s h a n d W i l d l i f e ( C D F W ) i s p l e a s e d t o
a n n o un c e f un d i n g o p p o r t un i t i e s u n d e r t h e 2 0 2 1 F i s h e r i e s R e s t o r a t i o n
Grant Progra m (FRGP ) P rop osal Solicita tion Not ice (Solic itation ) for
pr oject s th at lead t o process -ba sed rest orat ion , enhancement , or
pr otect ion of anadr omous salmonid hab itat . Th e pr oject s will
a d d i t i o n a l l y c o n t r i b ut e t o t h e o b j e c t i v e s o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a W a t e r
Act ion P lan , Californ ia Water Resilience P ortfolio, State Wildlife Act ion
P l a n , a n d f ul f i l l me n t o f C D F W ’ s m i s s i o n . A l l q u a l i f i e d , e l i g i b l e e n t i t i e s
a r e e n c o ur a g e d t o s ub mi t p r o p o s a l a p p l i c a t i o n s .
The F isheries Re st orat ion Gran t Progra m Gran t Guid eline s (Guideline s)
p r o v i d e d e t a i l e d i n f o r ma t i o n o n a s s o c i a t e d l a w s , r e g u l a t i o n s , a n d
g e n e r a l g r a n t r e q u i r e me n t s t h a t t h e P r o g r a m u s e s t o e s t a b l i s h
p r o c e s s e s , p r o c e d ur e s , a n d c r i t e r i a f o r a d m i n i s t e r i n g t h e g r a n t s
p r o g r a m s . H o w e v e r , t h e i n f o r ma t i o n i n t h i s S o l i c i t a t i o n s u p e r s e d e s a n y
d i s c r e p a n c i e s a mo n g t h e t w o d o c u me n t s .
Funding for Fiscal Year 202 1/2022
T o t a l f un d i n g a v a i l a b l e un d e r t h i s s o l i c i t a t i o n i s a n t i c i p a t e d t o b e
a p p r o x i ma t e l y $ 1 4 mi l l i o n , c o n t i n g e n t u p o n a l l o c a t i o n f r o m t h e
Nat ion al Ocea nic and At mospher ic Administrat ion ’s (NOAA) Pac ific
C o a s t a l S a l mo n R e c o v e r y F u n d ( P C S R F ) . T h e r e a r e n o a n t i c i p a t e d
f u n d s f o r t h e Ti mb e r R e g ul a t i o n a n d F o r e s t R e s t o r a t i o n F u n d f o r F o r e s t
Land Anadr omous Rest oration in 2021/2022 .
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 3Proposal Solicitation Schedule
Activity D at es
Relea se Prop osal Solicitat ion Notice March 2, 2021
App lica tion Work sh op s See FRGP’s Website (Var ious)
Pr oposa ls d ue by 3:00 p.m., Pac ific April 13, 2021
D a y l i g h t Ti m e
P r o p o s a l E v a l ua t i o n A p r i l 1 6 t o J u ne 2 2 , 2 0 2 1
F ield Rev iew s May 3 to J une 22 , 2021
D i r e c t o r A p p r o v a l / A n n o un c e A w a r d D e c e mb e r 2 0 2 1 o r J a n u a r y 2 0 2 2
E x e c ut e G r a n t A g r e e me n t s Spring 2022
C o mp l e t e a l l p r o j e c t w o r k a n d April 1, 2026
s u b mi t d e l i v e r a b l e s / f i n a l i n v o i c e
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 4Solicitation Workshops
W o r k s h o p s h i g h l i g h t i n g up d a t e s t o t h e S o l i c i t a t i o n a n d a p p l i c a t i o n
s u b mi s s i o n r e q u i r e me n t s w i l l b e h e l d t h r o u g h o u t t h e s t a t e . W o r k s h o p
a t t e n d a n c e i s n o t a r e q ui r e m e n t f o r s u b mi t t i n g a p p l i c a t i o n . W o r k s h o p s
m a y b e r e c o r d e d a n d ma d e a v a i l a b l e o n l i n e . L o c a t i o n s a n d d a t e s w i l l
b e p o s t e d o n C D F W ’ s P ub l i c M e e t i n g s a n d N o t i c e s w e b s i t e . S i g n u p t o
g e t n o t i f i c a t i o n s a b o ut up c o m i n g w o r k s h o p s .
Application Proposal Package
C o mp l e t e a p p l i c a t i o n s m u s t b e s u b mi t t e d o n l i n e a t C D F W W e b G r a n t s .
The pr oposal app lica tion is listed und er t he WebGrant s Fundin g
O p p o r t un i t y " F R G P 2 0 2 1 F un d i n g O p p o r t u n i t y ” . A p p l i c a n t s m u s t h a v e
an act ive Web Grant s user ac coun t t o apply . In str uction s for usin g the
online process are on th e FRGP P SN Web site . When usin g t he on lin e
a p p l i c a t i o n p r o c e s s , y o u a r e r e q u i r e d t o p r o v i d e a l l ma t e r i a l s
r e q ue s t e d i n t h i s S o l i c i t a t i o n a n d c o mp l y w i t h a l l r e q u i r e m e n t s l i s t e d i n
t h e F R G P G ui d e l i n e s f o r y o ur p r o j e c t t y p e .
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 5Table of Contents
2021 FISHERIES RESTORATION GRANT PROGRAM PROPOSAL SOLICITATION NOTICE
.................................................................................................................................................................... 1
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................. 3
FUNDING FOR FISC AL Y EAR 202 1/20 22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
P ROP OS AL SOL ICITATION SC HED UL E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
SOLIC ITATION WORKSHOPS ................................................................ ......... 5
A PPLIC ATION PROPOS AL P ACK AG E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
TABLE OF CON TENTS ................................ ................................ ................. 6
1.0 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ......................................................................... 8
1.1 Applican ts ................................ ................................ ............... 8
1.2 Projects ................................................................................... 8
2.0 P RO JECT TYP ES ................................ ................................ ............... 8
2.1 P riority 1 P roject Type s ................................ ............................. 8
2.2 P riority 2 P roject Type s ................................ ............................. 9
2.3 P riority 3 P roject Type s ................................ ............................. 9
3.0 FRGP Ove rv iew and B ackg ro un d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.0 P RO GRAM REQUIREMENTS ................................ ................................ . 11
4.1 Tribal Consultation .................................................................. 12
5.0 P ROP OS AL E VALUATION AND SCORING P ROTOCOL S .................................. 13
5.1 Admin istrative Review ................................ ............................. 13
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 65.2 Technical review criteria ......................................................... 15 5.3 Cost Analysis Ev aluation ................................ .......................... 15 5.4 C DFW an d NMFS Eng ineering and Ge oTe chn ical Level Review .... 19 5.5 P rog ram C riteria Re view ................................ .......................... 21 6.0 REFERENC ES AND RESOURC ES ................................ ............................. 25 Program .......................................................................................... 25 Plan s an d Guides ............................................................................. 25 Code s an d Reg ulation s ................................ ................................ .... 27 Permitting ....................................................................................... 27 FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 7
1.0 Eligibility criteria 1.1 Applicants E l i g i b l e a p p l i c a n t s i n c l ud e s t a t e a n d l o c a l g o v e r n me n t a g e n c i e s , p ub l i c e n t i t i e s , N a t i v e A me r i c a n I n d i a n T r i b e s , a n d n o n p r o f i t organ ization s. Pr oposa ls fr om pr ivate ind ivid uals or for -pr ofit ent erprises will n ot be accept ed. 1.2 Projects E l i g i b l e p r o j e c t s f o r t h i s s o l i c i t a t i o n a r e t h o s e f o r i mp l e me n t a t i o n o r d e s i g n p r o j e c t s t h a t r e s t o r e , e n h a n c e , o r p r o t e c t s a l mo n i d h a b i t a t i n a n a d r o m o u s w a t e r s h e d s o r p r o j e c t s t h a t s u p p o r t i mp l e m e n t a t i o n p r o j e c t s t h r o ug h p l a n n i n g , o u t r e a c h , a n d / o r e d u c a t i o n . P r o j e c t s c a n i n c l ud e m u l t i p l e p r o j e c t t y p e s l i s t e d i n S e c t i o n 2 . 0 . 2.0 Project Types Pr oposa l app lication s will be accep ted for the types of project s listed b e l o w , s ub j e c t t o t h e f un d i n g p r o g r a m c r i t e r i a . E l i g i b l e p r o j e c t t y p e s are liste d b elow with in the NOAA PC SRF F und ing Pr ior itie s. CDFW ha s dev eloped a two -lett er c oding system for project types (see FRGP Guidelin es , Part IV for deta iled descr iption s). 2.1 Priority 1 Project Types Pr oject s t hat r estor e, enhanc e, or pr otect salmon id h abitat in a n a d r o m o u s w a t e r s h e d s t h r o u g h i mp l e me n t a t i o n o r d e s i g n p r o j e c t s t h a t l e a d t o i mp l e me n t a t i o n . A p p r o x i ma t e l y 6 5 % o f t h e P C S R F g r a n t awar d will fund P riority On e Project s. FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 8
FP*+ Fish Pa ssa ge at Strea m HU*+ Wa ter shed Restoration
Cr ossin gs (Upslope)
H B 1* + In strea m Barr ier PD* Project Design (100%
M odification for Fish design)
Pa ssage
RE+ Coop erative Rear in g
H I* + In strea m Hab itat
SC*+ F ish Scr eenin g of
Rest oration
Diversions
H R*+ Ripa rian Rest oration
WC*+ Wa ter Con serva tion
H S*+ In strea m Bank Mea sure s
Stab ilization
2.2 Priority 2 Project Types
Pr oject s t hat mon itor stat us and tren ds and d irect ly contr ib ute t o
p o p u l a t i o n v i a b i l i t y a s s e s s me n t s f o r E S A - l i s t e d a n a d r o mo u s s a l m o n i d s
w i l l b e a d mi n i s t e r e d t h r o ug h a s e p a r a t e s o l i c i t a t i o n p r o c e s s o u t s i d e o f
t h i s 2 0 2 1 F R G P S o l i c i t a t i o n . A p p r o x i ma t e l y 2 5 % o f t h e P C S R F g r a n t
a w a r d w i l l f u n d P r i o r i t y Tw o P r o j e c t s .
2.3 Priority 3 Project Types
P r o j e c t s t h a t s up p o r t i mp l e me n t a t i o n p r o j e c t s t h r o u g h p l a n n i n g ,
o u t r e a c h , a n d / o r e d uc a t i o n . A p p r o x i ma t e l y 1 0 % o f t h e P C S R F g r a n t
awar d will fund P riority Three Pr oje ct s. Pr oposa ls for F RGP
p r o g r a m ma t i c p e r m i t r e q ui r e d e f f e c t i v e n e s s mo n i t o r i n g a r e i n e l i g i b l e .
MO M onit orin g Water sh ed OR Wa ter shed and Regional
Rest oration (Project - Or ganiza tion
scale)
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 9PD* Pr oject Design (Fea sib ility TE* Pr ivate Sect or Technica l
s t ud y ) Training and Education
PI P ub l i c In v o l v e me n t a n d WD* + Wa ter Mea surin g Dev ice s
C a p a c i t y B ui l d i n g (In strea m and Wat er
Diversion)
( I n c l ud e s A m e r i C o r p s p r o j e c t s )
P L* W a t e r s h e d E v a l ua t i o n ,
A s s e s s me n t , a n d P l a n n i n g
(Projec t-Sca le)
* P r o j e c t s ma y r e q u i r e t h e s e r v i c e s o f a l i c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l e n g i n e e r
o r l i c e n s e d p r o f e s s i o n a l g e o l o g i s t t o c o mp l y w i t h t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f
the B usiness an d Pr ofession s Code section 6700 et seq. (Pr ofessiona l
En gineers Ac t) and sect ion 7800 et seq . (Geologist s and Geophy sic ist s
Act ). If a pr oposed pr oject r equir es the services of licensed
pr ofessionals, t hese individuals and their affiliat ions must be identified
in t he pr oposal application. If this information cannot be pr ovided wit h
the applicat ion, an explanat ion must be pr ovided.
+All i mp l e me n t a t i o n t y p e p r o j e c t s m u s t h a v e a l l d e s i g n s a n d p l a n s
1 0 0 % c o mp l e t e d p r i o r t o g r a n t e x e c u t i o n i f t h e p r o p o s a l i s f u n d e d .
P r o j e c t s r e q ui r e d f o r m i t i g a t i o n o r u s e d f o r m i t i g a t i o n ( s u c h a s u n d e r
the Ca lifornia Env iron mental Qua lity Act (CEQA), Ca lifornia
Endan gered Species Act (CE SA ), Federa l Endangered Spec ies Act
( E S A ) , N a t i o n a l E n v i r o n me n t a l P o l i c y A c t ( N E P A ) , C a l i f o r n i a F o r e s t
Pract ices Act (FPA ) or Sect ion 404 of the Clean Water Ac t (CWA ) ) w ill
n o t b e c o n s i d e r e d f o r f un d i n g . P r o j e c t s u n d e r e n f o r c e me n t a c t i o n b y
a r e g ul a t o r y a g e n c y w i l l n o t b e c o n s i d e r e d f o r f u n d i n g .
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 103.0 FRGP Overview and Background
The goa l of th e Fisher ies Restorat ion Grant Progra m (FRGP ) is t o
r e c o v e r a n d c o n s e r v e C a l i f o r n i a ’ s s a l mo n a n d s t e e l h e a d t r o u t
p o p u l a t i o n s t h r o ug h p r o c e s s - b a s e d r e s t o r a t i o n a c t i v i t i e s t h a t r e s t o r e
se lf-sustainin g ecosy ste ms . The Progra m ob ject ive is t o fund pr oje ct s
t h a t r e s t o r e , e n h a n c e , o r p r o t e c t s a l mo n i d h a b i t a t i n a n a d r o m o u s
wat er sheds of Californ ia or project s that lead to rest oration ,
e n h a n c e me n t , o r p r o t e c t i o n o f a n a d r o mo u s s a l m o n i d h a b i t a t .
P r o j e c t s a r e d e t e r m i n e d t o b e a c c o mp l i s h i n g t h i s o b j e c t i v e b y
c o mp l e t i n g , i n p a r t o r i n w h o l e , a t a s k f r o m a S t a t e o r F e d e r a l
recovery plan. A general overview of the geographic area covered by
F RGP is sh own on Map 1 in the F RGP Guid eline s . Se e FRGP Guide lin e s
Tab le 1 : F RGP F oc us Water shed s for the spec ific water sh ed s eligib le
under this Solicitation .
4.0 Program Requirements
S p e c i f i c p r o g r a m r e q u i r e me n t s a n d d e t a i l e d s p e c i f i c a t i o n s f o r e a c h
pr oje ct type are available in the F RGP Guid eline s . In add it ion to th e
i n f o r ma t i o n r e q u i r e d un d e r P a r t I I a n d I I I i n t h e G u i d e l i n e s . I n f o r ma t i o n
r e q ue s t e d un d e r e a c h p r o j e c t t y p e m u s t b e s u b mi t t e d i n d e t a i l w i t h
t h e p r o p o s a l a p p l i c a t i o n . Th e a p p l i c a n t w i l l i d e n t i f y t h e p r i m a r y
pr oject type that best descr ibes the pr oposed pr oject . For ms and
e x a mp l e s o f s up p l e m e n t a l d o c u m e n t s c a n b e f o u n d a t t h e F R G P
Guid a n c e Tool s w e b sit e . Se e FRGP Guide line s, Part V for more
i n f o r ma t i o n a n d d e f i n i t i o n s o f s u p p l e me n t a l d o c u m e n t s .
I m p l e me n t a t i o n t y p e p r o j e c t s m u s t h a v e a l l d e s i g n s a n d p l a n s 1 0 0 %
c o mp l e t e d p r i o r t o g r a n t e x e c u t i o n , i f t h e p r o p o s a l i s f u n d e d . P r o j e c t s
t h a t h a v e n o t b e e n d e s i g n e d t o m e e t a l l r e q u i r e me n t s o f t h e
Ca lifornia Salmon id Stream Hab itat Re storat ion Man ua l, 4 th Ed ition
( C a l i f o r n i a D e p a r t me n t o f F i s h a n d G a me ) ( “ C A R e s t o r a t i o n M a n u a l ”
o r o t h e r a p p r o v e d g u i d e l i n e s a n d ma n u a l s f o r s a l mo n a n d s t e e l h e a d
hab itat rest oration will have the resp on sib ility of develop ing the
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 11a p p r o p r i a t e d o c u me n t a t i o n f o r C E Q A , E S A , a n d C E S A c o mp l i a n c e , i n c l ud i n g f i n a n c i a l a s s ur a n c e s u n d e r C E S A ( S e e F R G P G u i d e l i n e s , E n v i r o n me n t a l C o mp l i a n c e a n d P e r m i t t i n g i n P a r t V ) . 4 . 1 Tribal Consultation CDFW rec ogn izes the need for c onsultat ion regard ing pr ojects that a ffect Ca liforn ia trib al commun itie s. A s such , applicant s should make eve ry e ffort to inv olv e Native A merican Trib e s or stakeh olde r gr oup s a s appropriate. FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 12
5.0 Proposal Evaluation and Scoring Protocols
5.1 Administrative Review
F R G P s t a f f w i l l c o n d uc t a n a d m i n i s t r a t i v e r e v i e w o n a l l p r o p o s a l s . T h e
r e v i e w w i l l d e t e r m i n e i f t h e p r o p o s a l i s c o mp l e t e a n d m e e t s a l l t h e
s u b mi s s i o n r e q u i r e me n t s . If a n y “ N o ” b o x i s c h e c k e d b e l o w , t h e
p r o p o s a l w i l l b e c o n s i d e r e d i n c o mp l e t e a n d w i l l n o t r e c e i v e f u r t h e r
consideration.
P r o p o s a l N u m b e r & Ty p e : Yes No N/A
Pr oposed pr oject is within the Solicitat ion focus. ☐ ☐ ☐
The pr oposal as wr itt en addre sse s the identified Rec overy Task
☐ ☐ ☐
a n d c a n a c c o mp l i s h t h e Ta s k i n p a r t o r i n w h o l e .
1. I n t e r m e d i a t e P l a n s i n c l ud e d .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : F P , S C )
2. C o n c e p t ua l P l a n s i n c l ud e d .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : H U )
3. I n t e r m e d i a t e o r C o n c e p t ua l P l a n s i n c l u d e d .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : H B , H I , H S , W C , W D
4. P r o j e c t L o c a t i o n To p o g r a p h i c M a p i n c l u d e d .
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : F P , H B , H I , H R , H S , H U , M O , P D , P L , R E , S C , ☐ ☐ ☐
WC, WD)
5. W a t e r s h e d ( o r C o un t y ) M a p i n c l u d e d .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : H I, H U , M O , O R , P D , P I , P L , R E , T E , W D )
6. Pr ovisiona l Lan down er A ccess A greement/Pr ovisiona l
R e s o l ut i o n .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : F P , H B , H I , H R , H S , H U , M O , P D , P L , R E , S C , T E ,
WC, WD)
7. App licab le Detailed Pr oje ct Bud get s (inc ludin g
subcontractors). ☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e : A l l )
8. F e d e r a l A p p r o v e d In d i r e c t R a t e L e t t e r i n c l u d e d .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e : A l l )
9. W a t e r L a w C o mp l i a n c e d o c u me n t s i n c l u d e d .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : F P , H B , P D , S C , W C , W D )
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 13P r o p o s a l N u m b e r & Ty p e : Yes No N/A
1 0 . P h o t o g r a p h s i n c l ud e d .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : F P , H B , H I , H R , H S , H U , P D , R E , S C , W C , W D )
11 . Stat us Repor t included .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : O R , P I )
12 . Fen ce Maint enance Plan include d.
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e : H R )
13 . Ripa rian Re st oration Plan include d.
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e : H R )
1 4 . Q ua l i t y A s s ur a n c e a n d Q ua l i t y C o n t r o l ( Q A / Q C ) P l a n
i n c l ud e d . ☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : M O )
15 . E xist ing Cond ition s Sk etch inc luded.
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e : P D )
1 6 . F i v e Y e a r M a n a g e me n t P l a n .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e : R E )
1 7 . E v a l u a t i o n P l a n i n c l ud e d .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : TE )
18 . Inva siv e Spe cie s Preve ntion Protoc ols inc lude d.
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e s : A l l )
1 9 . R e f e r e n c e D o c u m e n t s i n c l ud e d .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e : M O , P L )
2 0 . P r o g r a m P e r m i t In f o r ma t i o n T a b l e – A p p e n d i x E .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e : F P , H B , H I , H R , H S , H U , S C , W C , W D )
2 1 . I n s t r e a m B e n e f i t s a n d I mp a c t A n a l y s i s i n c l u d e d .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e : P D , W C )
2 2 . W a t e r A c c o un t i n g a n d C o n s u m p t i v e U s e A n a l y s i s i n c l u d e d .
☐ ☐ ☐
( P r o j e c t Ty p e : P D , W C )
2 3 . T h i s p r o p o s a l r e q ui r e s t h e G r a c e P e r i o d f o r f u r t h e r r e v i e w . ☐ ☐
Grace Period C ondit ions: If r ece ivin g this rev iew d urin g the Grace Pe riod
p l e a s e s up p l y t h e mi s s i n g d o c um e n t ( s ) , m a r k e d “ N o ” , t o W e b G r a n t s b e f o r e t h e
d e a d l i n e o r t h e p r o p o s a l w i l l b e c o n s i d e r e d i n c o mp l e t e a n d r e j e c t e d f r o m
further consideration.
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 145.2 Technical review criteria
S e e F R G P G ui d e l i n e s f o r d e t a i l s o f t h e r e v i e w c r i t e r i a f o r e a c h p r o j e c t
type.
The techn ica l r eview c on sist s of a Pr ogr a m Rev iew Sc oresheet, a
B iologica l Rev iew Sc oresheet and an Engineer in g an d Geotechn ical
Rev iew Scor esh eet if applicab le . The Progra m Review is uniform for all
p r o p o s a l s a n d r e v i e w s p r o g r a m r e q u i r e me n t s l i k e q u a l i f i c a t i o n s , c o s t
s h a r e , a n d b ud g e t s . Th e B i o l o g i c a l R e v i e w i s s p e c i f i c t o e a c h p r o j e c t
type and rev iew s pr oje ct deta ils t o evaluat e the need and succe ss of
a p r o j e c t . Th e t e c h n i c a l r e v i e w t y p i c a l l y i n c l u d e s a s i t e v i s i t w i t h t h e
a p p l i c a n t a n d r e v i e w e r s . Th e E n g i n e e r i n g a n d G e o t e c h n i c a l R e v i e w
e v a l ua t e s c o n c e r n s t o t h e s a f e t y o f t h e p u b l i c a n d t h e s u c c e s s o f t h e
project.
App lican ts sh ould plan t o be ava ilab le fr om May 3, 2021 through J une
22 , 2021 . Reviewer s rev iew severa l sites a day and there is lit tle
flexibility.
5.3 Cost Analysis Evaluation
Eva luation of project c ost ana ly sis will inc lude the followin g:
1 . C o mp a r i s o n o f w a g e s , e q u i p me n t r a t e s , ma t e r i a l c o s t s , a n d
o t h e r p r o j e c t c o s t s f o r s i mi l a r c o m p l e t e d a n d p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t
work with in similar geograph ic region s.
2 . R e v i e w o f l a b o r c o s t s i d e n t i f i e d b y D e p a r t me n t o f I n d u s t r i a l
R e l a t i o n s G e n e r a l P r e v a i l i n g W a g e D e t e r mi n a t i o n s , D a v i s - B a c o n
l a b o r r a t e s , a n d r e c e n t C a l i f o r n i a E mp l o y m e n t D e v e l o p me n t
D e p a r t me n t w a g e d a t a .
3 . R e v i e w o f r e g i o n a l e q u i p me n t r e n t a l c o s t i n f o r ma t i o n , i n c l u d i n g
t h e m o s t c u r r e n t v e r s i o n o f C a l i f o r n i a D e p a r t me n t o f
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ’ s ( C a l Tr a n s ) L a b o r S u r c h a r g e a n d E q u i p m e n t
R e n t a l R a t e s p ub l i c a t i o n .
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 154. Re st oration cost s, lab or r eq uire ment s, and pr od uct ion rate s
ident ified in Append ix I of the Rec overy Strategy for Californ ia
Coho Salmon , DF G 2004 .
C o s t a n a l y s i s e v a l ua t i o n w i l l c o n s i d e r p r o j e c t l o g i s t i c s ( e . g . , s i t e
re moten ess, acce ssib ility , coord ination req uired with multiple lan d
h o l d i n g s ) , r e v i e w o f p r o d uc t i o n r a t e s / l a b o r r e q u i r e me n t s i n t h e
r e g i o n a l a r e a , a n d b e n e f i t t o t h e r e c o v e r y o f a n a d r o mo u s s a l m o n i d s .
The t otal pr oject cost does n ot a ffect the review score.
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 165.3.1 Cost Shar e S cor ing M atr ix
Pr oposa l#: P r o j e c t Ty p e : Region: Reviewer : Date: / /
P r o p o s a l N a me :
( H a r d C o s t S h a r e / To t a l P r o j e c t C o s t ) x 1 0 0 = % H a r d C o s t S h a r e
( / ) x 100 =
(Soft Cost Shar e / Tota l P roject Cost ) x 100 = % Soft Cost Share
( / ) x 100 =
Cost Shar e Categor ies
1 . C o s t s h a r e n o t s ui t a b l e : P r o j e c t s , p e r s o n n e l , o r s u p p l i e s a n d e q u i p m e n t
p r e v i o u s l y f un d e d b y C D F W ; r e s o u r c e s e x p e n d e d p r i o r t o t h e t e r m o f t h e
g r a n t ; s a l a r i e s o f p e r m a n e n t l y f u n d e d e mp l o y e e s w o r k i n g f o r t h e C D F W o r
N O A A F i s h e r i e s ; i n d i r e c t c h a r g e s ; mi t i g a t i o n f u n d s ; c o s t s h a r e f u n d s t h a t w i l l
n o t b e c o n f i r m e d b y D e c e mb e r 1 , 2 0 2 1 ; c o s t s h a r e b e i n g u s e d a s ma t c h f o r
other grants or entities .
2 . Hard c ost shar e: A ll hard c ost share must be N on -Federa l source d money or
i n - k i n d c o n t r i b ut i o n s w h i c h d o n o t c o me f r o m a F e d e r a l s o u r c e . H a r d c o s t
share can be provided by the applicant and/or the applicant’s partners
i n v o l v e d i n t h e i mp l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t c o n f i r m e d p r i o r t o
A u g us t 1 , 2 0 2 1 .
3 . Soft c ost shar e: A ll soft c ost share is F edera l sourced money or in -kind
c o n t r i b ut i o n s w h i c h c o m e f r o m a F e d e r a l s o u r c e . S o f t c o s t s h a r e c a n b e
provided by the applicant and/or the applicant’s partners involved in the
imple mentat ion of the pr oposed projec t. C ost sha re fund s that w ill b e
c o n f i r me d a f t e r A u g u s t 1 , 2 0 2 1 u p u n t i l D e c e mb e r 1 , 2 0 2 1 .
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 17C o s t s h a r e s c o r i n g ma t r i x :
90 -99% 80 -89% 70 -79% 60-69% 50 -59% 40 -49% 30-39% 20 -29% 10 -19% 5-9 % 0-4 %
Hard Hard Hard Hard Hard Hard Hard Hard Hard Hard Hard
90 -99%
Soft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
80 -89%
Soft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
70 -79%
Soft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
60 -69%
Soft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
50 -59%
Soft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.25
40 -49%
Soft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.25 -0.25 -0.50
30 -39%
Soft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.25 -0.25 -0.50 -0.50
20 -29%
Soft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.25 -0.50 -0.50 -0.75
10 -19%
Soft 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.25 -0.25 -0.50 -0.75 -1.0
0-9 %
Soft 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.25 -0.25 -0.50 -0.75 -1.0
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 185.4 CDFW and NMFS Engineering and GeoTechnical Level Review
Proposal #: Pr oject Tit le:
CD FW or NM FS Review E ngineer / Geologist :
Question YES NO N/A Comments
1. Are th e pr oblems to be addressed ☐ ☐ ☐
c orrect ly ident ified and adeq uate ly
charac terized?
2. Does the design approach, including the ☐ ☐ ☐
O&M , addr ess the ident ified problems?
3. Are th e t echniq ues pr oposed appr opriat e
for the chann el type (acc ording to the CA ☐ ☐ ☐
R e s t o r a t i o n M a n ua l , P a r t I I I o r a c c e p t e d
methods)?
4. A r e t h e p r o j e c t ma t e r i a l s ut i l i z e d t h e
appr opriat e size, typ e, and spec ies for the ☐ ☐ ☐
strea m zone (a ctive chann el and
floodpla in) and wa ter shed?
5. Does the proposal ident ify a ll nec essary ☐ ☐ ☐
s u r v e y s r e q ui r e d t o c o mp l e t e t h e d e s i g n ?
6. D o e s t h e In t e r m e d i a t e o r C o n c e p t u a l P l a n
Rep ort describ e the set of condition s,
c o n s t r a i n t s , a n d r e q u i r e me n t s n e c e s s a r y ☐ ☐ ☐
for pr oject design and are the p lans >65
p e r c e n t p l a n d e v e l o p me n t f o r t h e
following project categories: FP, HB, HS,
W D ( a n d s o me H I a n d H U ) ?
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 19Question YES NO N/A Comments
7. A r e a n y r e f i n e me n t s t h a t n e e d t o b e ma d e
t o t h e d e s i g n r e a s o n a b l e t o ma k e b e t w e e n
the 65% and 100% design? Does the ☐ ☐ ☐
pr oject p rop onent / design er seem willing
t o , c a p a b l e o f , a n d h a v e f un d s f o r ma k i n g
the necessary cha nges befor e the pr oject
i s e x e c u t e d ( i f f un d e d ) ?
8. If the project is like ly to req uire fut ure
c o n s u l t a t i o n o r e v a l ua t i o n o f a
c o n c e p t ua l / i n t e r me d i a t e p l a n a s i t i s ☐ ☐ ☐
be ing dev eloped is th is c on sultat ion
r e f l e c t e d i n t h e p r o j e c t t i me l i n e a n d
b ud g e t o r c a n i t b e a c c o mp l i s h e d w i t h i n
the project timeline/budget?
9. Do the licen sed engineer s and/or
geologist s have the exp erience and
exper tise req uired for projec t success ☐ ☐ ☐
( e . g . , d e mo n s t r a t e d e x p e r i e n c e o n s i mi l a r
pr oject s; tec hnica l expert ise appr opriat e
t o t h e p r o j e c t ; c o m m un i c a t i o n ,
c oordinat ion , and logistica l capab ilities)?
10. If the project is likely to require the
participation of a licensed engineer or ☐ ☐ ☐
geologist , is the licen sed pr ofessional
identified or the selection criteria for the
licen sed pr ofessional pr ovided?
11 . Fr om an engineer ing per spective, should
the pr oposa l b e c on sidered for fun din g?
Note: If any of the ab ove quest ion s wer e
an swer ed “NO” , then the pr oposa l should ☐ ☐ ☐
n o t b e c o n s i d e r e d f o r f un d i n g a t t h i s t i me .
If there are other engineerin g / fea sibility
rea son s why th e p rop osa l should n ot be
funded, state them h ere.
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 205.5 Program Criteria Review
Proposal#: Region: Reviewer: D ate:
Pr oposal Name:
I n i t i a l s c o r e i s 5 f o r t h e c o mb i n e d P r o g r a m C r i t e r i a R e v i e w a n d p r o j e c t t y p e B i o l o g i c a l R e v i e w s c o r e s h e e t s .
P o i n t s d e d uc t e d f r o m t h e P r o g r a m C r i t e r i a R e v i e w w i l l b e a d d e d t o t h e p o i n t d e d u c t i o n o n t h e B i o l o g i c a l
R e v i e w t o d e t e r m i n e t h e f i n a l s c o r e . F o r s c o r i n g c r i t e r i a n o t a p p l i c a b l e t o a p r o p o s a l , i n t h e “ Y e s ” c o l u mn
indicate “N/A” in lieu of “0”.
Program Criteria Review Proposal # Yes Med Low No Comments
1 . P r o p o s a l d e mo n s t r a t e s t h e p r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t o r
o r g a n i z a t i o n h a s t h e q ua l i f i c a t i o n s , e x p e r i e n c e ,
and capac ity to per for m the pr oposed ta sk s. Yes
= a p p r o p r i a t e l e v e l o f q ua l i f i c a t i o n s , e x p e r i e n c e ,
c a p a c i t y , a n d s uc c e s s f u l l y c o m p l e t e d p r e v i o u s l y
funded grant (s) (no missin g deliverab les, n o
0
i n v o i c i n g p r o b l e m s , n o m i s s e d t i me l i n e s ) ; M e d =
☐
l a c k s s o me q ua l i f i c a t i o n s , e x p e r i e n c e , c a p a c i t y , -0.5 -1 DNF
o r 1 m i n o r d o c u me n t e d p r o b l e m w i t h c o mp l e t i n g ☐ ☐ ☐
N/A
funded grant (s); Low = lack s significa nt
☐
q ua l i f i c a t i o n s , e x p e r i e n c e , c a p a c i t y , o r mo r e
t h a n 1 d o c u m e n t e d p r o b l e m w i t h c o mp l e t i n g
f u n d e d g r a n t ( s ) ; N o = un q ua l i f i e d ,
i n e x p e r i e n c e d , un c o o p e r a t i v e , o r ma n y
d o c u me n t e d p r o b l e m s w i t h c o m p l e t i n g f u n d e d
grant(s).
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 21Program Criteria Review Proposal # Yes Med Low No Comments
2 . P r o p o s a l d e mo n s t r a t e s t h e i d e n t i f i e d
subcon tractor (s) ha s t he qualification s,
exper ienc e, and capac ity to per for m the
p r o p o s e d t a s k s ; i f s ub c o n t r a c t o r ( s ) n o t i d e n t i f i e d ,
the se lect ion cr iter ia a re de scribed to en sure
subcontractors will be appropriate to the work.
Ye s = a ppropr iate level of q ua lificat ion s,
exper ienc e, capac ity , selec tion criteria 0
d e s c r i b e d , o r n o s ub c o n t r a c t o r s n e e d e d ; M e d = ☐
-0.5 -1 DNF
l a c k s s o me q ua l i f i c a t i o n s , e x p e r i e n c e , c a p a c i t y ,
☐ ☐ ☐
o r o n e mi n o r d o c u m e n t e d p r o b l e m w i t h p a s t N/A
w o r k un d e r f u n d e d g r a n t ( s ) , o r s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a ☐
n e e d s s o me c l a r i t y ; L o w = l a c k s s i g n i f i c a n t
q ua l i f i c a t i o n s , e x p e r i e n c e , c a p a c i t y , o r ma n y
d o c u me n t e d p r o b l e m s w i t h p a s t w o r k u n d e r
funded grant (s), or se lect ion cr iteria inadeq uat e;
N o = un q ua l i f i e d , i n e x p e r i e n c e d , u n c o o p e r a t i v e ,
n a me d s ub c o n t r a c t o r s n o t a p p r o p r i a t e f o r w o r k
p r o p o s e d a n d s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a mi s s i n g .
3 . P r o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n i n c l ud e s r e q u i r e d d e t a i l s a s
de scr ibed in t he PSN (Part IV intr od uct ion and
P r o j e c t Ty p e s p e c i f i c s ) , n e c e s s a r y t o w r i t e a
s t a t e m e n t o f w o r k f o r t h e g r a n t a g r e e me n t . Y e s =
d e s c r i p t i o n i n c l ud e s r e q u i r e d d e t a i l s d e s c r i b e d i n
the P SN t o writ e a grant agreemen t; Med = 0
descr ipt ion is missing req uired details described ☐
-1 DNF
i n t h e P S N a n d n e e d s s o me c l a r i f i c a t i o n b e f o r e a ☐ ☐
g r a n t a g r e e me n t c a n b e w r i t t e n ; N o = N/A
descr ipt ion is missing details, is general, and/or a ☐
list of act ivit ies with n o deta il, lackin g the deta il
nec essary t o writ e a grant agreement .
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 22Program Criteria Review Proposal # Yes Med Low No Comments
4. Pr oject b udget is appr opr iat e for th e work 0
p r o p o s e d . Y e s = b ud g e t i s a p p r o p r i a t e ; M e d =
☐
b ud g e t h a s 1 l i n e i t e m i n a p p r o p r i a t e f o r t h e w o r k -0.25 -0.5 DNF
p r o p o s e d ; L o w = mo r e t h a n 1 b u d g e t l i n e i t e m i s ☐ ☒ ☐
N/A
inappropr iate for the work prop osed; No =
☐
b ud g e t i s i n a p p r o p r i a t e f o r t h e w o r k p r o p o s e d .
5. Pr oject b udget is cost effect ive . Ye s = b udge t is
c ost effec tive ; Med = 1 or 2 b ud get it e ms ar e n ot 0
c o s t e f f e c t i v e b ut o v e r a l l t h e b u d g e t i s ☐
-0.25 -0.5 DNF
a c c e p t a b l e ; L o w = mo r e t h a n 2 b u d g e t i t e m s a r e
☐ ☐ ☐
n ot cost e ffectiv e b ut overa ll the b ud get is N/A
acceptable; No = ov erall budget is n ot cost ☐
effective.
6. Pr oject b udget is det ailed in descr ibin g project
c o s t s . Y e s = b ud g e t h a s n o un s p e c i f i e d l u mp
s u m s ; M e d = b ud g e t h a s 1 un s p e c i f i e d l u mp s u m
0
w i t h o ut s up p l e me n t a l d e t a i l o r a d e q u a t e b u d g e t
☐
j u s t i f i c a t i o n ; L o w = b ud g e t i s l a c k i n g d e t a i l w i t h -0.25 -0.5 DNF
m o r e t h a n 1 un s p e c i f i e d l u mp s u m w i t h o u t ☐ ☐ ☐
N/A
s u p p l e me n t a l d e t a i l o r a d e q u a t e b u d g e t
☐
j u s t i f i c a t i o n , ma k i n g i t d i f f i c u l t t o w r i t e a b u d g e t ;
N o = b ud g e t h a s m u l t i p l e l u mp s u m s l a c k i n g
de tail n ece ssary to wr ite a grant b ud get .
7 . I n f o r ma t i o n s up p l i e d a l l o w s f o r a f i e l d r e v i e w t o 0
b e c o n d uc t e d . Y e s = l a n d o w n e r ( s ) c o o p e r a t i v e ☐ DNF
and site v isit p ossible; No = landowner (s) N/A ☐
unc oopera tive, sit e v isit n ot p ossib le. ☐
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 23Program Criteria Review Proposal # Yes Med Low No Comments
8 . P r o j e c t a d d r e s s e s w i l d f i r e i mp a c t s Y e s = P r o j e c t
a d d r e s s e s s ub s t a n t i a l e c o l o g i c a l i mp a c t s t o t h e
wat er shed and salmonids ca used by wildfire or
wildfire suppression an d/or pr ovides benefit s t o
the wa ter shed and salmon id s q uickly a fter
Add
implementat ion in a ffected wildfire area s. 0
0 .5
Wild fire Priority J ust ificat ion is inc luded a s a ☐
☐
s u p p l e me n t a l d o c u me n t . N o = P r o j e c t d o e s n o t
i m p r o v e e c o l o g i c a l f un c t i o n i n a n a r e a
immediately a ffected by wildfire or Wildfire
P r i o r i t y J u s t i f i c a t i o n s up p l e me n t a l d o c u me n t i s
n o t i n c l ud e d .
9 . L e v e l o f ma t c h i n g f un d s a n d r e s o u r c e s ( f r o m
matr ix).
Pr ogra m Cr iter ia Revie w P oin t Ded uct ion s :
C o m me n t s :
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 246.0 References and Resources
Program
C D F W ’ s P ub l i c M e e t i n g s a n d N o t i c e s
FRGP Solicitation Documents
F RGP G uidan ce Tools
PCSRF Da ta Dic tionary (select “ Defin ition s” at top right )
CDFW WebGrants
Plans and Guides
C a l i f o r n i a D e p a r t me n t o f F i s h & G a m e . R e c o v e r y S t r a t e g y f o r
Ca lifornia C oho Salmon . State of Ca lifornia , Re sourc es A gency ,
D e p a r t me n t o f F i s h a n d G a me , 2 0 0 4 . ( P D F )
Coho Salmon Rec overy Tasks
F l o s i , G a r y , S c o t t D o w n i e , J a me s H o p e l a i n , M i c h a e l B i r d , R o b e r t C o e y ,
and Barry Collin s. Californ ia Salmon id Stream Habitat Restorat ion
M a n ua l , 4 t h e d i t i o n . S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a , R e s o u r c e s A g e n c y ,
D e p a r t me n t o f F i s h a n d G a me , 2 0 1 0 .
V o l um e 1 ( P D F ) ; V o l um e 2 ( P D F )
Nat ion al Marin e Fisher ie s Service . Final C oastal M ultispec ie s Rec overy
P lan: Ca lifornia Coa sta l Ch in ook Sa lmon , N orthern Ca lifornia
Steelhea d, Central Ca lifornia Coa st Steelhead . NMFS West Coast
Region, Santa Rosa , 2016 .
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 25Nat ion al Marin e Fisher ie s Service . Final Rec overy Plan for the Southe rn
Or egon/N orthern Ca lifornia C oa st Evolutionar ily Significant Un it
of Coho Salmon (“ SONCC p lan” ). NMF S West Coa st Regi on ,
Arcata, 2014.
Nat ion al Marin e Fisher ies Service. 1997. F ish Scr een ing Cr iter ia for
A n a d r o m o us S a l m o n i d s . N M F S S o u t h w e s t R e g i o n , 1 9 9 7 . ( P D F )
Nat ion al Marin e Fisher ies Service . Guidelines for E lectr ofishing Water s
Containin g Sa lmon id s Listed Under th e En dangered Species Act .
2000 . (P DF)
Nat ion al Marin e Fisher ies Service . Guidelines for Sa lmon id Passage at
Stream Cr ossin gs. NMF S Southwest Region, 2001 . (P DF )
Nat ion al Marin e Fisher ie s Service . Rec overy Plan for Evolut ionar ily
Significant Un it of Centr al Ca lifornia Coa st Coh o Sa lm on (“CCC
p lan” ). NMF S Southwest Region, San ta Rosa, 2012 .
Nat ion al Marin e Fisher ies Service. Rec overy Plan for the Ev olut ionar ily
Significant Un it s of Sacramento River Win ter -Run Chin ook Salm on
and Ce ntral Va lley Spr ing -Run Ch inook Salm on and the Distinct
P o p ul a t i o n S e g m e n t o f C a l i f o r n i a C e n t r a l V a l l e y S t e e l h e a d . N M F S
W e s t C o a s t R e g i o n , S a c r a me n t o , 2 0 1 4 . ( P D F )
Nat ion al Marin e Fisher ie s Service . South -C entral Ca lifornia Stee lhea d
Rec overy Plan . NMF S South we st Region, Lon g Beach , 2013. (PDF)
Nat ion al Marin e Fisher ie s Service . South ern Californ ia St eelh ead
Rec overy Plan . NMF S South we st Region, Lon g Beach , 2012.
California Water Action Plan
Ca lifornia Water Resilienc e P ortfolio
State Wildlife Action Plan
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 26C o a s t a l W a t e r s h e d P l a n n i n g a n d A s s e s s me n t P r o g r a m ( C W P A P )
Codes and Regulations
Ca lifornia Code of Regulat ion s (CCR), Title 14 , Division 6, Chapter 3 ,
A r t i c l e 5 , S e c t i o n 1 5 0 6 4 . 4 : G r e e n h o u s e G a s E mi s s i o n s I mp a c t s
C a l i f o r n i a E mp l o y me n t D e v e l o p me n t D e p a r t m e n t w a g e d a t a
Ca lifornia Endan gered Spec ies Act (CE SA )
C a l i f o r n i a E n v i r o n me n t a l Q u a l i t y A c t ( C E Q A )
Ca lifornia Forest Pract ices Act (FPA), AKA, Z’Ber g -Nejedly Forest
Pract ice Act or Californ ia Forest Pract ice Rules (PDF )
C o d e o f F e d e r a l R e g ul a t i o n s
Federal Unifor m Grant Gu idance 2 CFR sect ion 200
M o d i f i e d To t a l D i r e c t C o s t ( M T D C ) 2 C F R s e c t i o n 2 0 0 . 6 8
Federal Enda nger ed Sp ecies Act (E SA )
N a t i o n a l E n v i r o n me n t a l P o l i c y A c t ( N E P A )
Permitting
C D F W D o c u me n t L i b r a r y – p r e v i o u s y e a r s ’ p e r mi t d o c u me n t s
CDFW Scientific Collec tin g P ermit (SCP )
Ca lifornia Rapid Assessment Meth od
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 27C o a s t a l D e v e l o p me n t P e r mi t ( s ) f r o m t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o a s t a l
C o m mi s s i o n
Hab itat Restora tion a nd En hancement Act
L a k e a n d S t r e a m b e d A l t e r a t i o n A g r e e me n t ( 1 6 0 0 p e r m i t )
FRGP Mitigated Negative Declaration
NMFS Biological Opinions
S t a t e W a t e r R e s o ur c e s C o n t r o l B o a r d ( S W R C B ) A me n d e d G e n e r a l 4 0 1
W a t e r Q ua l i t y C e r t i f i c a t i o n O r d e r f o r S ma l l H a b i t a t R e s t o r a t i o n P r o j e c t s
U . S . A r my C o r p s o f E n g i n e e r s ( U S A C E ) C W A S e c t i o n 4 0 4 p e r mi t t i n g
USACE Regiona l Gen eral P er mits (RGP ) (P DFs)
• R G P 1 2 ( N o r t h C o a s t c o u n t i e s o f A l a me d a , C o n t r a C o s t a , D e l
N o r t e , G l e n n , H u mb o l d t , L a k e , M a r i n , M e n d o c i n o , M o n t e r e y ,
Napa , San Benito, Sa n Fr ancisco, San Luis Obisp o (n orthea st ,
n on-c oa sta l), San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cr uz, Siskiy ou,
S o l a n o , S o n o ma , a n d T r i n i t y ) .
• RGP 16 (port ion s of the follow in g C entra l Va lley count ie s:
A l a me d a , A ma d o r , B u t t e , C a l a v e r a s , C o l u s a , C o n t r a C o s t a , E l
Dorado, Fr esno, Glenn , K ings, Madera, Mar iposa , Merced,
N e v a d a , P l a c e r , S a c r a me n t o , S a n B e n i t o , S a n J o a q u i n , S h a s t a ,
S o l a n o , S t a n i s l a u s , S u t t e r , T e h a m a , T u l a r e , T u o l u mn e , Y o l o , a n d
Y ub a C o u n t i e s ) .
• R G P 7 8 ( S o ut h C o a s t c o u n t i e s o f L o s A n g e l e s D i s t r i c t : L o s
An geles, Ora nge, River side, San Bernard in o, San Diego, San
Luis Ob ispo, Santa Barbara , a nd Vent ura ).
FRGP PSN 2021/2022 Page 28You can also read
