Sustainable winegrowing, is it sustainable or just another fad?
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
1 Published in Annals of Agrarian Science 5,4 87-90, 2007 Sustainable winegrowing, is it sustainable or just another fad? - An international overview Authors Gemmrich, Armin R. Prof. Dr.; Head of Wine Business Administration Department Heilbronn University, Max-Planck-Str. 39, 74081 Heilbronn. GERMANY; gemmrich@hs-heilbronn.de Corresponding author Arnold, René C. G. Diplombetriebswirt (FH), Research Fellow Wine Business Administration Department Heilbronn University, Max-Planck-Str. 39, 74081 Heilbronn. GERMANY; rcgarnold@hs-heilbronn.de Abstracts Climate change and international discussions about sustainable and environmentally friendly actions oblige us to rethink our way of working in the wine industry. Internationally, there is done a lot in terms of sustainable winegrowing. Especially new world wine producing countries are ahead in sustainable practices. This article summarizes the different approaches of major international wine producing countries and lists opportunities for other wine countries. Currently, climate change and the protection of the environment form the focus of the international debate. More often than not the protection of the environment is considered as impeding the prosperity of enterprises, especially in the agricultural sector. This is also true for the wine growing industry which puts most of its efforts into the improvement of its products. Vintners tend to think of environmental friendly actions as counterproductive for the quality of their wine as well as their earnings. Sustainability offers a solution for this conflict by integrating protection of the environment, profitability and social issues. It is a wholesome approach towards wine growing and wine making. Modern wineries all over world have begun to realise sustainability because of its numerous advantages which will be laid out in detail in this article. Sustainability is more than just environmentally friendly To take a closer look at sustainability, it is, first of all, necessary to distinct it from two other major modern forms of wine growing: biological wine growing and biodynamic wine growing. Organic wine growing focuses mainly on the environment. Beside this focus, the other major focus of this practise is to protect the wine from as many as possible external ingredients. Thus beholding its true nature and decreasing the environmental impact of its production. Biodynamic winegrowing is based on the thoughts of Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925) who founded the anthroposophy movement at the beginning of the 20th century. Followers of this approach strive for wholesomeness of their work i.e. production of wine in accord with nature and with respect to lunar phases. Generally, organic farming is “an ecological production management system that promotes and enhances biodiversity, biological cycles, and soil biological activity. It is based on minimal use of off-farm inputs and on management practices that restore, maintain and enhance ecological harmony.” (US National Organic Standards Board, 1998) However, both approaches neglect two essential parts of sustainability: [1] the working men and [2] the profitability of all measures taken. Together with the protection of the environment these two measures form the triangle of sustainability. Sustainable wine growing reaches from the vineyard to the bottle on the shelf in the supermarket. It is a system that employing the soil’s fertility as base, aims at taking measures to reduce emissions. The general idea is to
2 sustain the ecological digestibility as well as the healthiness of living and following generations in an overall profitable and economical way. The Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program at University of California, Davis emphasizes that sustainable viticulture integrates three main goals: environmental health, economic profitability, and social and economic equity. Therefore, sustainable wine growing is not only relevant for the present day, but also important for the future. Basic ecological rules of sustainable development: - Dangers and unacceptable risks to the human health by anthropogenic activities have to be minimized. - The use of renewable resources —such as biomass- should never exceed their ability to recover. - Non-renewable resources —such as mineral ores, coal, oil… should only be consumed to such extend that physically and functionally equivalent replacement is created, either by renewable resources or by a higher productivity of renewable and non-renewable resources. - Substitute non-renewable by renewable resources. - Improve and increase the use of technology measures to reduce the burden on the environment. - Reduce the volume of discards and pollution. - The timeline of any anthropogenic impacts on the environment has to be in a balanced relation to the timeline of environmental reaction and adaptation processes. Why should we follow the guidelines of sustainable wine growing? Levitian [2001] speaks of a special relevance of sustainability in the wine line of business because the wine industry constitutes numerous dangers for the environment as well as for human beings. The production of wine like the production of any good leads to a number of by-products. Waste and especially wastewater are very important factors. For example, the Sicilian professor Cellura and his team have calculated that the production
3 of a single bottle of red wine produces 0.5 kg waste and emits 16 g of SO2. [Rosenthal, 2006] A recent Australian study took a closer look at the water consumption in wine production. It showed that on average the wineries used 2 litres of fresh water for each 0.75 litre bottle of wine. The winery using the largest amount of water exceeded the best performing by 3,000 per cent. This fact highlights the huge potential of reducing water consumption in a winery. [Frost et al., 2007] The reduction of fresh water consumption can be the first step. The major challenge is rather to prevent marc, must or wine to enter the drainage system. Thus the improvement of production processes not only helps the environment, but also increases the usable amount of wine and thereby the turnover of the winery. [Goss, 2007] Concerning the winery’s staff labour-intensive and health-endangering jobs in the vineyards as well as in the cellar are of special relevance. Beside the standard health and safety protection at the workplace there is still need for optimization of these working processes. All workers should be engaged in this constant optimization process. Thereby one can achieve not only recognizable advantages in terms of profitability, but also and even more important a significant improvement of corporate culture and staff motivation. The concept of sustainability also puts importance on a long-term and trustful cooperation with stakeholders, suppliers and customers. Examples from the wine industry Internationally, on the base of these arguments many different programmes have been developed to secure a sustainable wine growing practice. Considering the most important part of self assessment the Californian wineries definitely take the leading role. As early as 2001 the Californian wineries under the leadership of the Wine Institute and the “California Association of Wine grape Growers” [CAWG] developed the “Code of sustainable Winegrowing Practices”. It is a self assessment tool for each winery or winegrower with which he is able to benchmark his own winery using 15 chapters with questions. Contrary to most common systems this one does not count on rigid rules and limits that have to be achieved no matter what. [Dlott/Birdseye, 2002] As an alternative to this system winegrowers around the world can use the “Positive Point System”. This handbook for self-assessment was developed by the Central Coast Vineyard Team. Based on a set of simple questions it offers a concise way to assess the state and the potential of sustainable practice in the assessed winery. [www.vineyardteam.com] New Zealand is also one of the pioneers of sustainable winegrowing. The slogan “CLEAN AND GREEN” is an umbrella brand for the whole country and its products, and wine growing has to meet the requirements stemming from this strategy. The organisation responsible for the process of integrating sustainable practices into wine growing in New Zealand is called “Sustainable Winegrowing New Zealand” [SWNZ]. It started with only a handful wineries. Later on an official system was created on the basis of VitiSwiss from Switzerland. Today, SWNZ members represent 60 per cent of the whole vineyard area in NZ, i.e. 70 per cent of all wines produced in NZ are produced within the regulations of SWNZ. [www.sustainable.org.nz] Similarly, Australia is very active when it comes to sustainability in wine growing. The umbrella that integrates all sustainable activities in Australian wine industry is the general strategy called “Sustaining Success” which has been established in 2002. Under this umbrella regular events take place. For example, there is an annual Wine Industry Waste Management Forum where the wine industry’s handling of the waste process is
4 analysed. The wineries can pass on their practices, their ideas and concerns to wide range of peers as well as representatives from organisations and institutions engaged in the wine industry. [WFA 2006a; 2006b] Within the borders of Australia the state of Victoria seem to be especially active in terms of sustainable winegrowing. They have founded the “Environmental Protection Authority” [EPA]. This state initiative supports wine growers and wineries in implementing sustainability schemes. [EPA Victoria, website] Equally, within this framework the Coonawarra region has established a region wide sustainable winegrowing scheme in 2004. [n.a., 2004] The South African program for sustainable winegrowing is called IPW [Integrated Production of Wine] and has been established as early as 1998. Different partners including parties that do not stem directly from the wine industry like research institutes, suppliers of pesticides or fertilizers have developed this system voluntarily. The sustainability scheme is self funded and not financially supported by the government. Each member has to pay a fee based upon its produced amount of wine. Nevertheless, the system is very successful. Since the harvest of 2000 nearly 100 per cent of South African wines have been produced according to the rules and regulations set by the IPW. Partly, the success of this system is due to the fact that all members of IPW have been able to reduce their costs for water supply, pesticides, and fertilizers drastically. Thus each one can see the benefits directly in his pocket. [WOSA, 2000] However, the IPW is not the only project in South Africa dealing with sustainable winegrowing. The Biodiversity & Wine Initiative [BWI] established 2004 puts its emphasis on the protection of biodiversity at the Cape, which is endangered by the monoculture vine plantings. The World Bank financially supports this project. However, the initiative also collects fees from its members. The whole system is based upon competition of who is able to do most for biodiversity. [Winter, 2004] Meanwhile, approximately 40 per cent of all South African winegrowers and vintners have become members of the BWI thus actively taking responsibility for the biodiversity at their sites. [BWI, website] Equally, the South African wine industry hand in hand with the government actively deals with its special historic burden of segregation and therefore also gives attention to the social component of sustainability. The name of the initiative is “Black Empowerment”. Its aim is to raise the proportion of wineries run by disadvantaged black individuals up to 25 per cent in the year 2010. Within the framework of this initiative the so called Thandi project stands out among many other less successful projects. This project has been supporting black workers directly and qualifies them to work independently. The wines produced by the Thandi project are very successful around the world, but especially in Great Britain. In 2003, the project was the first winery ever awarded the Fairtrade accreditation. Meanwhile three wineries are part of the Thandi project. [Thandi project, website] Especially the new world wine producing seems to endeavour very seriously the issue of sustainable winegrowing. However, there are also concepts for this in European wine growing countries. It begins with the training of students. For example, at the University of Montpellier [France] there is a special course of study called “Integrated Wine Production” solely dealing with all aspects of sustainable measures in winegrowing, environmental laws and rules as well as the marketing of sustainable produced wines. Furthermore, the old world is able to show that sustainability is clearly not a new concept that has to be paid with high qualification and technical efforts. For example, vineyards in France built as terraces promote biodiversity and avoid erosion. [Barham, 2003] In Germany, international sustainability schemes such as ISO 14 001 [also the basis for some regional Australian environmental management schemes [WFA, 2006b]] and EMAS
5 II (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme) are successful. Also the participants of the so called KONVOI program organised and supported by Heilbronn University have not regretted the step towards sustainable production of wine or fruit juices under the framework of EMAS II. Beside the optimization of all processes and the saving of resources and money, these firms clearly emphasise the potential communication effects of their certification. The right to show the logo of the achieved certification enables them to communicate effectively the merit and reliability of their practices to the customers. Seen in an international dimension, the four participants: Staatsweingut Weinsberg, Streker Natursaft GmbH, Weingut Sonnenhof and the Winzergenossenschaft Niedernhall are not alone. In 1998, four New Zealand wineries [Martinborough Vineyard, C.J. Pask Winery, Palliser Estate and Vidal Estate] also have already achieved ISO 14 001 certification in a very similar way. Just as the four German firms, these four wineries also profit from the marketing relevant aspects of the achieved certification. [Hall, 2001] Environmental management — step stone of sustainable winegrowing Even though sustainable practices are used widely in the international wine industry, many wine growers may still have concerns about the merit of these practices, especially when they are organised in a systematic way, for example, under the framework of a certain environmental management scheme like ISO 14 001 or EMAS II. One of the most often stated prejudices is mentioned by Reynaud and Simon [2004]. They refer to the fact that environmental management schemes may, due to their strict rules and strong documentary routines enable competitors to deduce production’s secrets. Besides the fear of espionage, there is also the concern about this scheme hindering the possibilities of wine growers to act innovatively and make use of all their competitive advantages. However, one has to consider that an implementation of an EMS also provides a rare 0pportunity to look at each process in the winery directly in a somewhat more objective way and think about how to improve this particular process. Therefore, it might turn out that the implementation enforces rather than impedes innovation. [Walther, 2004] Furthermore, ISO 14 001 as well as EMAS II may truly set a very strict regulatory framework, however, it is definitely not possible to derive any knowledge about internal processes only on the basis of the obligatory documentation published. Equally, one should worry too much about the costs of implementation since they have to be seen in medium and long term context. Another problem most people do not think of when implementing such an EMS is much more important and even more difficult to solve. Independent from the choice of the EMS the scheme has to be implemented in every layer of the company. [Gemmrich, 2003] It should not be reduced to a firm corset of rules, but rather it is important to communicate the merit and importance of the system to every man working at the winery — full-time, part-time and seasonal workers. For it is highly deciding for the success of any measures to include all workers in the implementation process. Here especially small wineries have an actual advantage for they usually employ few workers and what is more important have flat hierarchies and a good corporate culture. Additional benefits Sustainable practices turn out to be also very interesting when it comes to communication, advertising or public relations. As it has been said before especially New Zealand and South Africa are very keen to talk about their wineries’ focus and efforts on sustainability. New Zealand promotes this via its “CLEAN AND GREEN” campaign which does not only support wine, but also most other agricultural products. In fact it forms the
6 brand of the whole country. South Africa on the other hand follows a clearly tourist oriented approach using its responsibility for biodiversity and therefore the protection of local flora and fauna as tourist attraction. This has two positive results: on the one hand the overall health of the vineyard is supported and secured in the long term; on the other hand the installed biodiversity route brings tourist to South Africa and its wineries. Back in their home countries they might become wine consumers and thus multipliers for South African wine. Also the Californian wine growers want to use their clear sustainability direction as a marketing tool. They are planning on a fund supported by the winegrowers in their region to conduct a large-scale campaign aiming at placing California as a sustainable acting wine region in the head of the wine consumers. [Warner, 2006] Equally, the French winegrowers want to use this opportunity. Their slogan is “viticulture raisonnée” and shall be used strongly as a means of communication and public relations. For they identify this principle as an additional benefit and competitive advantage in today’s overcrowded wine shelves. They offer orientation and security to the customers. [viti-net, 2006] Conclusion After all, sustainability is much more than just a recent trend. Rather is a concept that has been applied successfully by the international wine industry for several years. It is, however, used not only to decrease costs and human influence on the environment, but also first and foremost for the creation of competitive advantage and public relations. The implication stemming from these numerous advantages and possibilities should lead to a greater spreading of such practices in the wine industry. First and foremost developing wine countries still have the opportunity to build wineries oriented towards sustainability right from the beginning.
7 References 1. Levitan, L.: Not by wine alone: environmental impacts, risks and consequences of viticulture, paper prepared for the 11th Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference, October 2001 2. Rosenthal, E.: Rating a Sicilian red’s true cost to the Earth, in: International Herald Tribune, 16.10.2006 http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/10/13/business/wbwine.php 3. Frost, P.; Kumar, A.; Correll, R.; Quayle, W.; Kookana, R.; Christen, E.; Oemcke, D.: Current practices for winery wastewater management and its reuse: an Australian industry survey, in: The Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry Journal, 22(1), 2007, 40-46 4. Goss, P.: Cleaner production, it’s easier than you think, in: The Australian & New Zealand Grapegrower & Winemaker, 517, 2007, 43-44 5. Dlott, J.; Birdseye, K.: Code of Sustainability Workbook, in: Wine Business Online, August 2002, http://www.winebusiness.com/Html/MonthlyArticle.cfm?dataId=18032 (04.04.2007) 6. http://www.vineyardteam.org (08.03.2007) 7. http://www.sustainable.org.nz/newsitem.asp?r=national&id=1681 (30.03.2007) 8. WFA (Ed.): Australian Wine Industry — Public Environment Report, Key Findings: 2005, Kent Town, 2006a; WFA (Ed.): Wine & Environment, What’s going on in the Australian wine industry?, AWIS System Map: Version 5.2, 2006b 9. EPA Victoria (Ed.): Winemakers’ Environmental Management Kit, http://www.epa.vic.gov.au/bus/EMS/WineEMS/welcome/index.shtml (08.03.2007) 10. No Author: Coonawarra launches environmental management plan, in: The Australian & New Zealand Grapegrower & Winemaker, 491, 2004, 47-48 11. No Author: Integrated Production of Wine http://www.wosa.co.za/sa/sustainable_ipw.php (03.10.2007) 12. Winter, S.: The Biodiversity & Wine Initiative; Why a Biodiversity & Wine Initiative?, in: Wynboer — A Technical Guide for Wine Producers, 2004(Dec), http://www.wynboer.co.za/recentarticles/0412bio.php3 (04.04.2007) 13. http://www.bwi.co.za (20.04.2007) 14. http://www.thandi.com (21.04.2007) 15. Barham, E.: Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labelling, in: Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 2003, 127-138 16. WFA (Ed.): Wine & Environment, What’s going on in the Australian wine industry?, AWIS System Map: Version 5.2, 2006b 17. Hall, L. S.: Is Viticulture Getting Enough Attention in Bordeaux? Different Forms of Sustainable Farming are Beginning to Be Popular, in: Wine Business, 2001(Dec), http://winebusiness.com/html/PrinterVersion.cfm?dataId=14409 (04.04.2007) 18. Reynaud, E.; Simon, E.: The secrets of a good winery: core competences, in: British Food Journal, 108(4), 2006, 243-255 19. Walther, M.: Umweltmanagementsysteme und Unternehmenskultur — Unternehmens-kulturelle Passung als Wirkungsdeterminante von Umweltmanagementsystemen? Eine empirische Untersuchung in sechs Unternehmen, München/Mering, 2004
8 20. Gemmrich, A.R.: Umweltmanagement in der Weinwirtschaft. Deutsches Weinbau-Jahrbuch 55, Ulmer Verlag 2003, 27-33 21. Warner, M.: Growers Consider Campaign to Promote California Grapes, in: Wine Business online, 2006(Dec), http://www.winebusiness.com/html/PrinterVersion.cfm?dataId= 22. Viti-net (Ed.): Viticulture raisonnée — Une piste pour vendre plus de vin, http://www.viti- net.fr/outils/fiches/fichesdetail.asp?idRub=24&id=34178 (04.04.2007)
You can also read