What's feeding our food? - The environmental and social impacts of the livestock sector
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
istock What’s feeding our food? The environmental and social impacts of the livestock sector Friends of the Earth December 2008 1
Indoor broiler farm for meat production “Livestock’s contribution to environmental problems is on a massive scale.” UN Food and Agriculture Organisation 2006 GettyImages 2
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 1. IMPACTS OF THE LIVESTOCK SECTOR 6 SOY’S ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 8 Agricultural expansion in Latin America 9 Land use change 10 Local environmental impacts 14 LIVESTOCK FARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE 15 IMPACTS ON RURAL COMMUNITIES 17 Unemployment and land ownership 17 Slavery 17 Health impacts of pesticides 18 Food insecurity 18 LIVESTOCK AND HEALTH 19 2. WHAT’S DRIVING LIVESTOCK EXPANSION? 20 Growing consumption 20 Soy and animal feed 20 Exporting soy to Europe 21 Soy and animal feed in the UK 22 Poultry farming 22 Pork production 23 Dairy farming 24 The role of agribusiness 24 Global finance 24 Agricultural policy and soy 26 3. SOLUTIONS 28 REFERENCES 32 3
INTRODUCTION The global food supply is under Beef raised on cattle ranches in highly Growth in demand for livestock increasing scrutiny. Climate change, biodiverse areas of the Amazon, Cerrado products is set to continue, leading to the volatility in the cost of staple foods such grasslands and Chaco habitats is conversion of more and more land for as rice and grain, and fluctuations in oil shipped to Europe and Britain to put meat crops and grazing, further exacerbating prices have exposed vulnerabilities in a on our plates. Increasing quantities of the associated impacts. The developing system that is failing to feed some of the chicken and pork are also being imported. biofuels market adds to the demand for poorest people around the world. As forests and other precious wildlife land. Our globalised food system is failing habitats are destroyed to make way for s This report gives a detailed account fundamentally. It requires ever-growing crops for animal feed and pasture for of the environmental and social quantities of land, water, energy and grazing, indigenous people also lose their impacts of the current system of chemical inputs to produce the food we territories. Rural communities are being producing meat and animal products, eat. This is particularly true of intensive forced off their land, and small scale in particular from the UK’s reliance livestock production. farmers have nowhere to grow the food on imported soy for animal feed. Animals in factory farms in the UK and they need for their families. Europe have been bred to require high Latin America is a major player in the s It uncovers the interdependence levels of protein to fuel fast growth and livestock market. Brazil is responsible between intensive livestock farming high yields of meat, dairy and eggs. This for almost a third of global beef exports in the UK and Europe and soy industry is increasingly global. Even and 40 per cent of exported chicken.3 production in Latin America, and though bacon, burgers, milk and cheese The country is also the second largest investigates the role of agribusiness, may be produced in the UK, most will exporter of soy after the USA, followed global finance and agricultural have come from animals fed on crops by Argentina4 and Paraguay. The vast policies in driving this system. grown on the other side of the world - majority of soy grown worldwide is used many of the damaging impacts of mass for animal feed. s It makes the case for an urgent production are being exported. This global system is not working for overhaul of the current model, and According to the UN’s Food and farmers in the UK. With commodity price proposes policy changes in the Agriculture Organisation (FAO), the rises, farmers have seen the cost of UK and Europe to help create a livestock sector “emerges as one of the animal feed and other inputs increase. sustainable and equitable livestock top two or three most serious contributors The price of fertiliser grew by 156 per system for farmers, consumers and to the most serious environmental cent in the last year.5 The cost of chicken the environment. problems, at every scale from local to feed has risen by £80/tonne in the same global”.1 In fact it is responsible for 18 period.6 The UK pork sector has already per cent of global greenhouse gas seen its market share shrink as a result,7 emissions.2 and pig farmers have been hit by volatile Great swathes of Latin America have feed costs. been given over to growing soy, which is shipped around the world to be used in animal feed as cheap protein for chicken, pigs and cattle. 4
Photolibrary Cattle ranch in Mexico 5
1 IMPACTS OF THE LIVESTOCK SECTOR Livestock uses 70 per cent of all available agricultural land, and uses 8 per cent of the global human water supply. Global intensive livestock production Fattening a cow Land conversion has a high environmental price. Rearing 1 kg of intensively-reared beef requires Land for grazing covers more than a animals for food uses large areas of up to 10 kg of animal feed11 and 15,500 quarter of the planet’s available ice- agricultural land, vast quantities of water litres of water.12 It produces as much free surface.15 An average of 6 million and significant amounts of energy. It pollution as driving for three hours while hectares of forest – an area twice the is a cause of deforestation and land leaving the lights switched on at home.13 size of Belgium – and 7 million hectares use change, generating greenhouse of other land have been converted to gas emissions and destroying valuable The global spread of intensive farming agriculture every year for the last 40 carbon sinks and wildlife habitat. The has led to a major increase in the use years.16 livestock industry is also a significant of high protein animal feeds, comprising source of pollution.8 cereals and vegetable proteins such as This massive demand for land has Livestock already uses 70 per cent of soy. In fact, 97 per cent of the soymeal been heightened by the growing biofuel all available agricultural land, and uses produced worldwide is used for animal market – soy is used to make biodiesel, 8 per cent of the global human water feed, and with demand set to double while sugarcane is the main source supply.9 by 2050, more and more land is being of ethanol. Government figures show Livestock’s contribution to climate turned over to feeding livestock.14 that soy, partially sourced from Brazil,17 change is greater than that of transport.10 was the main source of biodiesel in It is responsible for 18 per cent of global the UK following the introduction of the greenhouse gas emissions – including 9 Renewable Fuel Obligation (April - May per cent of anthropogenic global carbon 2008). dioxide (CO2) emissions and 37 per cent Latin America’s growing agro-industry of anthropogenic methane. has led to new roads and waterways being built to transport soy, increasing access to remote areas, often at the expense of natural habitats and communities. 6
“Livestock impacts on ecosystem goods and services are largely negative, through impacts such as deforestation nutrient overloading, greenhouse gas emissions, nutrient depletion of grazing areas, dryland degradation from overgrazing, dust formation, and bush encroachment.” Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005 GettyImages Cattle ranching in Latin America Cattle ranching is big business in Brazil. With 204 million cattle, the country is the world’s largest exporter of beef, producing 7.6 million tonnes in 2003.18 Exports of leather goods, predominantly shoes, are also growing. Brazilian beef cattle are almost entirely fed on pasture, with some 86 per cent of Brazilian agricultural land used for grazing.19 This recent expansion has been primarily on forest land which has been cleared to make way for pasture.20 Land in the Amazon is cheap and provides good quality pasture. Cattle ranching in Mato Grosso traditionally takes place on the Cerrado (savannah) grasslands. But this land is increasingly being converted to arable land for soy, pushing cattle ranchers into the forest, which provides nutrient-rich soil and high quality pasture for cattle rearing.21 Brazilian beef accounts for 13 per cent of the UK’s total beef imports or 4 per cent of all beef consumed in the UK.22 Pastureland that has been burnt for cattle ranching in the Amazon rainforest 7
1 IMPACTS OF THE LIVESTOCK SECTOR SOY’S ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Changes in the way that land is used Agricultural expansion affects biodiversity as plants and animals in Latin America lose their natural habitats. Such changes Soy production in Latin America has also release huge quantities of carbon more than doubled in the last 15 years. dioxide, contributing to climate change.23 This rapid expansion is driving the Land use change – from forest to conversion of forests and grasslands to farmland – also affects the water cycle. cropland and grazing, devastating vast Stripped of its vegetation, the soil holds areas of wildlife habitat with wide-ranging less water and is more vulnerable to effects on the global environment. It erosion as it drains away.24 is estimated that a further 100 million Soy cultivation itself uses fertilisers hectares of pasture could be converted and pesticides that pollute the soil and for crop land in Brazil alone.26 Cattle ground water.25 Genetically modified (GM) farmers, displaced by the expansion of soy requires an even more intensive soy, have sought out new land, burning chemical regime – almost all soy grown undergrowth to clear areas that were in Argentina and Paraguay is GM. once covered by forest. 8
Corbis Soy expansion has had dramatic effects on rural life, as well as impacting on other areas of agriculture. Many small-scale farmers have been priced off their land or forced to sell to bigger producers, losing their homes and their livelihoods. Rural unemployment has increased as large scale soy farms need little labour.27 As a result, many rural labourers have migrated to the cities to look for work.28 Intensive livestock farms in Europe are a major destination for Latin American soy exports. Agricultural policies and trade agreements with the United States mean that Europe grows few crops for animal protein and now depends on imports for animal feed.29 Soybeans are harvested at Fartura Farm, in Mato Grosso state, Brazil – March 2008 9
1 IMPACTS OF THE LIVESTOCK SECTOR Land use change Paraguay Paraguay is the fifth largest Brazil Brazil is the second largest global Argentina Soybean production covers producer of soy and the fourth largest producer of soybeans after the United around half of Argentina’s cultivated land exporter globally. The country has seen States, followed by Argentina and then and is centred in the states of Cordoba, a rapid expansion in recent years, with Paraguay.33 Production is increasing in Santa Fe and Buenos Aires. Expansion nearly 2.5 million hectares planted with all three countries, with a 170 per cent is spreading into the heavily forested soy in 2006/7.32 increase in Brazil in the last 15 years. northern states such as Salta and The Atlantic Forest extends into Within Brazil, soy production is Santiago del Estero – around 415,000 Paraguay’s high altitude grasslands. Only concentrated in the state of Mato Grosso hectares of forest were cleared in Salta 2 per cent of the country’s original forest (27 per cent), Paraná (22 per cent), Rio between 2002 and 2006.30 area remains, in increasingly isolated Grande do Sul (15 per cent) and Mato Soy is also eating into the rich fragments, due to clear cutting to make Grosso do Sul (12 per cent).34 biodiversity of the sub-humid Chaco- way for agriculture. Recent expansion has been Yungas area, leading to the destruction Displaced cattle farmers and, concentrated in Mato Grosso, Paraná of habitat and rural settlements. Large- increasingly, soy plantations are moving and Goiás – with half of the growth in scale plantations are effectively forcing into the Chaco. This diverse habitat Mato Grosso and Goiás at the expense small scale farmers off their land. and important ecosystem includes dry of natural habitat.35 According to government figures a total savannah and wet forest and extends Mato Grosso forms part of the Amazon of 250,000 hectares of forest are cleared across large parts of Paraguay, Bolivia region, with forest covering more than annually, with 80 per cent of this making and Central and Northern Argentina. half of its total land area. Cerrado way for soy and cattle farming in the Agri-business giant Cargill’s planned (savannah) covers most of the remaining Chaco.31 A further 4.9 million hectares mega port facility on the River Paraguay territory. More than half of Brazil’s soy are vulnerable to soy conversion by 2020. threatens to drive further expansion of production is in the centre and south of The Atlantic Forest, which runs along soy into the region. the state on land that was once covered the eastern coast of Brazil and inland to by Cerrado. A study of the displacement Paraguay, Argentina and Uruguay, has impacts of soy expansion in Mato Grosso also suffered from soy expansion which found that for every four hectares of soy has destroyed unique habitat and put planted, five hectares of natural habitat rare species at risk. were destroyed.36 Around 92 per cent of the Atlantic Forest’s amphibians are unique to the area. 10
BRAZIL BRASILIA BOLIVIA SAO PAULO ASUNCION URUGUAY Remaining Atlantic Forest BUENOS Original Atlantic Forest AIRES Biodiversity in the Atlantic Forest The Atlantic Rainforest is one of the world’s most biodiverse ecosystems, classified as a biodiversity hotspot. It extends from Brazil’s Atlantic coast, inland to Paraguay and into Argentina.37 It now covers less than 10 per cent of its original area. The rainforest is home to around 8,000 unique plant species and more than 20 critically endangered species, including the eskimo curlew, white-collared kite, the black-faced lion tamarin and the leatherback and hawksbill sea turtles.38 Approximately 92 per cent of the forest’s amphibians are unique to the area. There are fears that soy expansion in the Atlantic Forest could destroy another 1.5 million hectares by 2020.39 The Atlantic Forest boasts 20,000 plant species. Yet less than 10 per cent of the forest remains. Simon Rawles/Friends of the Earth Biodiversity Hotspots, Conservation International 11
1 IMPACTS OF THE LIVESTOCK SECTOR Biodiversity in the Amazon It is estimated that a further 9.6 million Biodiversity in the Cerrado The Amazon rainforest is the world’s hectares of Cerrado could be lost to soy The Cerrado is one of the largest and largest tropical forest extending across expansion by 2020.46 most biodiverse savannah areas in Brazil, Peru, Columbia, Venezuela, By 2005 over 6 million hectares had the world covering an area the size of Ecuador, Bolivia, Guyana, Suriname and been converted to soy within the legal Western Europe. Its unique habitat is French Guiana.40 The Amazon is one boundaries of the Amazon.47 Vast areas made up of large stretches of grassland, of the world’s most biodiverse regions of the Amazon have also been cleared scrub and areas of woodland which run comprising a mosaic of ecosystems and to raise cattle,48 causing much greater alongside river banks. vegetation types including rainforests, indirect impacts due to ranching and It is internationally recognised as a seasonal and deciduous forests. slash and burn farmers. biodiversity hotspot – an area that is It is home to almost a third of the world’s The recent soy price boom has also home to a large number of unique known species,41 with more than 1,300 fuelled an increase in deforestation, species, and which has already lost more species of bird alone. These include the with more than 3,000 square miles of than 70 per cent of its original natural toucan, the harpy eagle and more than forest cleared between August 2007 and vegetation.52 300 species of hummingbirds. There are August 2008 alone.49 If current trends The Cerrado is home to 40 per cent of 3,000 fishes42 and over 100,000 types of continue, cattle ranchers and soy farmers Brazil’s mammals,53 reptiles and fish, invertebrates43. Many of these species alone will destroy 40 per cent of Amazon including a number of endangered are only found in Brazil, including the rainforest by 2050.50 species, such as the giant armadillo, the critically endangered black-faced lion Brazil’s forests play a crucial role giant otter and the hyacinth macaw.54 It tamarin, the buffy-headed marmoset and in the fight against dangerous climate also provides a habitat for at risk species the maned three-toed sloth.44 change, storing carbon dioxide which such as jaguars, maned wolves and The forest is also home to around 220 is released when the forest is cleared. ocelots. groups of indigenous people who have Continuing deforestation at the present lived in the Amazon for thousands of rate will make it all but impossible to years.45 bring greenhouse gas emissions under control.51 12
PA photos If current trends continue, cattle ranchers and soy farmers alone will destroy 40 per cent of Amazon rainforest by 2050. Bolivia Bolivia is not a major global Uruguay The soy industry is moving EU efforts to tackle deforestation exporter of soy, but plantations have into Uruguay, where plantations are The European Union (EU) has put expanded into the country as a result concentrated primarily on the west forward proposals to stop global of state and World Bank funding. Soy coast – a number of these are owned by deforestation by 2030 and to halve covered 950,000 hectares in 200655 Argentine soy farmers who are attracted tropical deforestation by 2020.59 and plantations are now moving into by Uruguay’s tax regime. The country The EU believes that a Global Forest the Chiquitano forest region, which has produced 460,000 tonnes of soy beans Carbon Mechanism, operated as part been described as one of the largest in 2005.57 of the United Nations Framework remaining tracts of “relatively undisturbed As more and more land is converted to Convention on Climate Change’s tall dry forest in the Neotropics, if not the soy, local food production is reduced. As (UNFCCC) mitigation measures, will entire world.”56 The area provides habitat plantations move into the Sauce region in help reduce deforestation by providing a to vulnerable species including the jaguar, which fruit and vegetables are grown for financial reward for retaining forests. maned wolf, ocelot and spider monkey. the capital, organic farmers and market It also wants European timber suppliers gardeners are concerned about pollution to seek guarantees that the timber they from the soy fields and the effects of GM sell has not been sourced illegally. It has soy.58 proposed further studies of the links between deforestation and the imports of non-timber products like soy. Soy field in Santa Cruz, Bolivia 13
1 IMPACTS OF THE LIVESTOCK SECTOR The UK uses 1.43 billion cubic metres of Brazilian water a year through imported soy. WWF UK Water Footprint 2008 Local environmental impacts Pesticide pollution Damaging soil Much of the soy in Latin America is Clare Oxborrow/Friends of the Earth The soil on soy plantations is exposed to grown from Monsanto’s Roundup wind and rain and therefore vulnerable to Ready genetically modified (GM) seed, erosion. Brazil loses 55 million tonnes of prompting growers to use even more soil through erosion each year. As much intensive farming methods. Roundup as 8 tonnes per hectare is lost in the soy Ready soy is genetically modified fields of the Chaco. Intensive farming to tolerate Monsanto’s Roundup methods deplete the soil’s nutrients and (glyphosate) herbicide, but reliance on require fertiliser to compensate.60 this technology has led to the emergence of herbicide-tolerant weeds. As a result, Water use and water pollution increased quantities of Roundup, as well Soy plantations need water and can be as older and more damaging herbicides irrigated to boost yields. Irrigated crops like 2,4-D and Paraquat, have to be can even provide three rather than two used.66 harvests a year.61 Recent dry years in GM soy accounts for 98 per cent of Paraguay and Brazil have led to smaller the soy harvest for Argentina and 90 per than expected harvests.62 Although Brazil cent in Paraguay. GM crops have been is rich in terms of its water supply, 40 introduced more slowly in Brazil and million Brazilian families do not have some restrictions exist in the Amazon access to supplies of clean drinking region. It is estimated that around 50 per water63 and parts of the country have cent of the Brazilian crop is still non- suffered severe drought in recent years. GM.67 Water supplies in the soy-producing Glyphosate has become a major areas are contaminated with the source of pollution which contaminates chemicals used by soy growers. Large surface water and aquifers, threatens quantities of mineral fertilisers are human health and kills other vegetation. Young soy plants in a field in Paraguay needed to compensate for the degraded It is sprayed onto crops from huge soil, causing excess nutrients to build up spraying tractors or from the air. Farmers in the soil and in the water, alongside a in neighbouring fields report that the cocktail of pesticide residues.64 spraying destroys their crops and some The FAO estimates that 7 per cent of have reported poisoned livestock. global human water use is for growing Few insects or other wildlife live on soy feed crops for livestock.65 plantations, making the plants vulnerable to pests and increasingly reliant on pesticides.68 In Paraguay, laws requiring soy farmers to plant buffer zones of native vegetation around fields to help protect neighbouring communities are routinely flouted. If any trees are planted at all, they tend to be 14
LIVESTOCK FARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE istock non-native eucalyptus or pine trees. The livestock sector is a huge contributor to climate change, generating significant emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide throughout the production process. The conversion of forest and grassland to cropland emits stored carbon and reduces the global capacity for absorbing carbon dioxide. Globally, this land-use change set in motion by livestock farming leads to the release of 2.4 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide a year – equivalent to around 6 per cent of global greenhouse emissions.69 The manufacture of animal feed is also a major source of emissions through fertiliser production and from processing. Soy is a particularly energy-intensive crop because of the process used to extract oil from the bean.70 Methane emissions from livestock Land-use change contribute around 6 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions.71 Cows, set in motion by sheep and goats emit methane through the digestive process (enteric livestock farming fermentation), while manure is also high in methane. leads to the release As meat and dairy consumption increases, methane emissions are of 2.4 billion tonnes predicted to rise by up to 60 per cent by 2030.72 of carbon dioxide Livestock also generates nitrous oxide Mature rainforest emissions from fertilisers, crop waste a year. and the intensive storage systems used for animal waste. This contributes around FAO, 2006 6 per cent to total greenhouse gas emissions.73 15
1 IMPACTS OF THE LIVESTOCK SECTOR Greenhouse gas emissions from soy Energy use Livestock is responsible for 18 per cent Energy use continues at practically every of global greenhouse gas emissions.74 step of the livestock chain, from feed The production of animal feed from soy crop to the fridge. Rearing, slaughter, generates greenhouse gas emissions processing and storage all require energy, both at the cultivation and the processing as does the transport involved at each stage. stage.78 Once meat has been eaten, its Soy is a nitrogen-fixing plant, which packaging and the uneaten elements means it stabilises nitrogen in the are transported and treated, generating soil. But after harvest, nitrogen can be further CO2, methane and nitrous oxide. released, producing nitrous oxide (N2O) as the plants rot in the soil. Argentina In the UK, 18 per cent of greenhouse gas lists soy as a source of greenhouse emissions come from food production gas emissions in its report to the United and consumption.79 Nations Framework Convention on Emissions from agriculture have Climate Change75 after studies showed stabilised within Europe, mainly as a that plantations increase the country’s result of reduced fertiliser use. But with emissions of N2O. large quantities of feed crops and food Nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse now imported from Latin America, much gas, but nitrogen also plays a crucial of Europe’s greenhouse gas emissions role in the Earth’s living systems through from livestock have effectively been the nitrogen cycle. Nothing can grow exported rather than reduced. without nitrogen but too much stimulates A recent study by the Tyndall excessive growth, which poisons water Centre for Climate Change Research courses through eutrophication.76 highlighted how levels of deforestation Once soybeans have been harvested and greenhouse gas emissions from they are processed to extract the soy oil food production affect our potential to and the soybean meal. This is an energy- meet carbon reduction targets elsewhere intensive chemical process that was in the economy. The study found that found to be the most significant source of even if emissions from food production CO2 emissions77 during a study of energy were halved by 2050, and if 70 to 80 per use in Minnesota, United States. cent of the current forest carbon was preserved, global emissions from other sectors would need to peak by 2015 and then decrease by up to 6.5 per cent a year if there was to be any chance of avoiding dangerous climate change by limiting the temperature rise to 2˚C.80 Placio Duarte, from Organización Campesina del Norte, stands in his brother’s small farm next to an exposed soy field in the state of Concepcion, Paraguay. 16
Three out of four soy farms in Paraguay are owned by foreign landowners. IMPACTS ON RURAL COMMUNITIES Unemployment and land profits. Indigenous communities, whose ownership traditional land rights are not always The majority of soy plantations are owned recognised or respected, have seen their by large landowners and multinational lands and way of live destroyed by the companies and can cover up to 50,000 spread of soy. hectares.81 Large-scale soy production The growing demand for land has is highly mechanised and very profitable. led to conflicts across the soy-growing The planting and harvesting is carried region, with reports of violent attacks on out by machines, meaning few people rural communities. A large number of are employed – a mechanised farm has communities have been forcibly evicted an average of one employee per 200 from their homes and their houses burnt, hectares.82 often in the middle of the night.86 The This has had a dramatic impact on rural Paraguayan police and security forces populations in soy-growing areas. Small have been accused of operating death landowners, who find soy production squads, with at least 18 rural leaders is not viable on a small scale, are killed.87 displaced by the bigger producers, while Paraguay’s new president, Fernando campesinos (people who live and work Lugo, elected in 2008, has promised in the countryside) are left unemployed. support for small farmers through land Many have been forced off their land and reform, but will have to fight his way thousands of others have left rural areas through a corrupt system to achieve to look for work in the cities. this.88 Around 80 per cent of Paraguay’s soy is destined for export83 due to the export- Slavery orientated agriculture model introduced Soy producers in Brazil have been found in the country in the 1960s. This has to use slave labour to clear forest land encouraged companies to develop large- to make way for soy plantations. In 2004, scale soy farms, often ignoring the rights the government intervened and found of the rural poor. 1,012 slaves on farms in Mato Grasso, There are around 1.5 million small some of whom were children.89 farmers in Paraguay, yet 70 per cent of Workers clearing the land are paid the land is owned by just 2 per cent of minimal wages and, in some cases, they the country’s landowners.84 The vast are forced to work for free at gunpoint majority of the rural population does not in return for food provided by the own land and lives in extreme poverty. companies. Anyone trying to escape is Only 15 per cent of this population has shot or punished. Hundreds of reports Clare Oxborrow / Friends of the Earth access to safe drinking water and 42 per of slavery at soy companies are being cent to medical care.85 investigated by the Brazilian Ministry of Many soy developers in Paraguay Labour.90 are from abroad, particularly Brazil, attracted by cheap land prices and easy 17
A crop-spraying aeroplane showers a field with pesticides. Gerd Ludwig / Panos Pictures Health impacts of pesticides Pesticide poisoning in Argentina93 Food insecurity Once the plantations have been Villagers in Colonia Loma Senés, a small Across the region, the spread of soy established, surrounding communities farming community in Formosa Province, has reduced the number of small farms are at risk from the pesticides and Argentina, were the victims of repeated – traditionally the source of food for the herbicides mechanically sprayed on the sprayings from the long-armed tractors local community, as well as changing soy crops. In the Brazilian state of Piauí used to spray soy, known as mosquitoes. farming patterns on larger farms. there were 65 reports of poisoning during The tractors were spraying glyphosate In Argentina, traditional farming 2005, 15 of which were fatal.91 and 2,4-D. methods used until the 1990s saw In February 2003, at least 23 farming farmers rotating maize, wheat and Killed by pesticides in Paraguay families suffered after a northerly wind soybeans to allow the soil to recover, but In 2003, Silvino Talavera, an 11-year- directed a cloud of pesticides towards this method of farming has now virtually old boy in Paraguay, died after a tractor their fields. The chemicals destroyed disappeared.95 The number of dairy spraying chemicals on a soy field failed to most of their crops, leaving the plants farms also halved between 1988 and see him in its path. His two sisters were burnt. Chickens in a neighbouring barn 2003, while production of corn, rice, oats also hospitalised, but survived. were poisoned and died. People suffered and beans has decreased substantially.96 Supported by CONAMURI, a peasant vomiting, nausea, nose bleeds, breathing The result has been an increase in food and indigenous women’s organisation, difficulties and problems with their eyes. insecurity. Figures show that between the boy’s mother took legal action to The damage left the communities without 1996 and 2003 the number of people seek justice for the murder of her son. enough food to feed themselves, let in Argentina unable to access a “basic As a result, the family were repeatedly alone sell at market. When the authorities nutrition basket” rose from 3.7 million threatened, their animals killed and checked water supplies, they found they to 8.7 million. Urban poverty and high farmland sabotaged. were contaminated with pesticides. unemployment have been exacerbated Silvino’s older brother, a member of the No official action was taken to stop the by the loss of rural employment due to National Peasant Movement in Paraguay, spraying so the community resorted to the expansion of soy.97 was murdered. legal action, asking for an injunction. The Silvino’s older sister suffered numerous judge granted a six-month ban, which health problems following the pesticide was extended for a further three months, incident and two years ago gave birth to but in September 2003 the farm resumed a baby who was diagnosed as suffering spraying.94 from birth defect hydrocephalus. In November 2006, the two landowners Communities living near soy plantations responsible for the spraying were finally report ongoing health problems including sentenced to two years in jail, after their continuous headaches, skin rashes, appeal was turned down by the Supreme stomach problems, increased rates Court.92 of miscarriage and babies born with malformations. 18
Skinned pigs hanging in a slaughterhouse Photolibrary LIVESTOCK AND HEALTH Meat and dairy products are considered problems, including an increased risk of an important source of protein in the kidney problems. A diet rich in animal human diet, and provide a range of protein also tends to have high levels of minerals and vitamins including iron, zinc animal fats, which in excess increases and vitamin A. But the high levels of the risk of heart disease and stroke. consumption of livestock products in the There is also evidence of a link industrialised world have been clearly between the consumption of meat, linked to a number of health problems, particularly red meat, and some cancers. particularly heart disease, stroke and The World Health Organisation (WHO) certain cancers. estimates that 30 per cent of cancers Levels of meat and dairy consumption in the Western developed world (and vary significantly between different 20 per cent in developing countries) are countries, rural and urban areas, and caused by dietary factors.102 Cancer is income groups. responsible for 7.1 million deaths globally Consumption generally rises as each year, and more than 20 million incomes increase,98 and as more people people suffer from cancer worldwide.103 move into towns and cities giving them The World Cancer Research Fund greater access to refrigerated produce. Expert Report warns that there is strong From 1997 to 1999, average global evidence that red and processed meats consumption for meat and dairy products cause bowel cancer and recommends was 88 kg/year in industrialised countries limiting consumption of red meat and compared to a global average of just 36 avoiding all processed meats.104 The kg/year. In South Asia it was just 5 kg per report found that eating 150 g of person per year.99 processed meat a day (equivalent to Studies show the total protein three sausages) increases the risk of requirement from plant or animal sources developing bowel cancer by 63 per for a healthy 70 kg adult living in a cent.105 developed country is approximately 22 The WHO has also raised concerns kg/year. The exact requirements depend about the health impacts of food on the individual, age and level of produced intensively with high levels of activity.100 fertilisers and pesticides, residues of Most people living in the industrialised which can contaminate food supplies. world, particularly meat eaters, Longer food chains mean longer consume more than their daily protein storage and transport routes, creating a requirement.101 greater risk of food products deteriorating Eating more protein than the body and increased use of preservatives.106 needs has been linked to health 19
2 WHAT’S DRIVING LIVESTOCK EXPANSION? Average meat consumption per person in 2002 2 52 125 80 74 39 Figure 2: Food and Agriculture Organization 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 of the United Nations (FAO) Meat consumption per capita (kilograms per person) Growing consumption How soy is used istock The livestock sector is estimated to Soy is a legume which grows in North double in size by 2050.107 As figure 2 and South America, Asia and Europe. It shows, the United States consumes the produces beans containing high levels most livestock produce globally, with of protein and oil. The harvested beans each American eating an average 125 are processed to extract the oil (around kg of meat a year – equivalent to more 20 per cent of the bean), which is used than 400 sirloin steaks.108 Per capita meat for human consumption, animal feed and consumption in Europe averaged 74 biofuels. kg in 2002, while the UK consumed an The high protein soymeal left over after oil average 80 kg/person109 – equivalent to extraction (around 75 per cent) is toasted 1,400 pork sausages – nearly 4 a day.110 and ground. Animal feed accounts for 97 What’s more, poultry consumption in the per cent of global soymeal production. UK has doubled in the last 20 years.111 Demand is also growing in some Europe’s reliance on imported soy is a developing countries as a result of legacy of European agricultural policy rising incomes and a growing urban dating from the start of the Common middle class112, although it is still well Agricultural Policy (CAP), which stated Soy beans below European and US levels. Meat that imports of animal feed were not consumption in China has gone from subject to the same tariffs as other an average of 20 kg per capita in 1980 agricultural produce. This meant it made to 52kg today.113 Although in India meat sense for farmers to import feed, initially consumption has grown by 40 per cent from the United States. in the last 15 years, it is still 40 times lessIn 1992 the United States negotiated outbreak in the 1990s. The reduction in than average consumption in the UK. a limit on European oilseed production availability of fishmeal due to increased as part of the Blair House Agreement demand from aquaculture was also a Soy and animal feed which led to even greater dependency on significant factor in the switch to soy.115 Soy contains high levels of vegetable imported soy.114 It is possible to grow alternative protein and has a lower oil content A further significant increase in sources of protein within the UK and then other seeds, making it suitable for demand for soy came after the ban Europe – including oilseed rape meal, protein-rich feed meal. Soy accounts for on processed animal proteins in feed peas and beans – but the distorting effect 65 per cent of all proteins used for animal as a result of bovine spongiform of the CAP and trade barriers introduced feed in Europe (40 per cent in the UK). encephalopathy (BSE) crisis. Meat and by the United States, mean that for many bone meal were a common source of European countries it has been cheaper protein for livestock feed prior to the and more convenient not to do so. 20
Percentage of total soybean harvest exported to EU by Latin American countries 2006-07 7% 32% 25% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Figure 3: Food and Agriculture Organization Total soybean harvest (1000 tonnes) of the United Nations (FAO) Soybean equivalent exported to EU (million tonnes) Exporting soy to Europe Flickr The European Union (EU) relies on Brazil for 64 per cent of soybean imports and Argentina for 61 per cent of soymeal imports.116 This demand accounts for almost a third of Brazil’s total soybean harvest – see figure 3. In 2007 more than 78 per cent of UK soybean imports and 34 per cent of soymeal imports came from Brazil. A further 47 per cent of the UK’s soymeal was imported from Argentina. A small percentage of soy was imported from Paraguay,117 although as the country exports most of its soy to Brazil and Argentina, it is likely that the EU is indirectly consuming significant amounts of Paraguayan soy. Europe’s land grab The amount of land needed to produce soy for the European market since the ban on meat and bone meal in 1996 is roughly equal to the area of deforestation in the Brazilian rainforest since that date.118 Sacks of soy beans for export 21
Soy and animal feed in the UK Three million chickens each week Pork production Soy is a particularly significant feed The UK’s poultry market is dominated The UK consumes approximately 803,000 ingredient for pigs and poultry where high by five companies who process more tonnes of pork and 488,000 tonnes of protein levels are needed to achieve the than 50 per cent of the chicken meat bacon – that is 74 pork chops and 270 quick growth rates. Other sectors, such on sale.126 The biggest of these is bacon rashers132 – per person a year. as dairy, are also reliant on soy to provide Grampian which was acquired by Dutch Around two thirds of this is reared in the the protein element of the feed. Figure company VION in 2008.127 Grampian UK, with the remainder imported from 4 shows the relative quantities of soy processes 19 per cent of chickens sold Europe. needed to produce the livestock products in the UK – almost 3 million chickens Cereal, oilseed (soy) and pulses are used consumed in the UK. a week that are sold as fresh, frozen for pig feed. Amounts vary according to and cooked products. Other big players the age of the pig and the price of cereal Poultry production in the UK include Faccenda (2 million compared to soy – soy usually makes up Poultry is the fastest growing sector in chickens a week), 2 Sisters Food Group 8 to10 per cent of the total feed.133 the global livestock industry119 and is the which supplies Tesco, Waitrose and most frequently eaten meat in the UK. Marks &Spencer, the rapidly expanding There are around 3,000 broiler farms Northern Irish company Moy Park, Poultry feed accounts in the UK (raising chickens for meat) with and Sun Valley, which is owned by the approximately 120 million broiler chickens US grain giant Cargill and supplies for more than half of in production at any one time.120 McDonalds and Morrisons.128 High-protein diets have been all the soy used in the developed to make birds grow faster, The Latin American poultry sector has keeping the cost of the meat low. Most grown significantly in recent years and UK livestock sector. chickens now reach their desired weight provides 10 per cent of UK imports.129 within about 40 days121, compared to 84 Poultry production is increasing in days for organic birds.122 Cereals, soy Argentina and Chile, but Brazil is home and legumes form the basis of most to the largest Latin American poultry poultry feed,123 with soy making up industry and accounts for 40 per cent of between 20 and 25 per cent.124 exports. Around half of Brazilian poultry The UK poultry industry supplies is exported. Major markets include around 88 per cent of the overall UK China, Japan, Russia and the European market, but imports roughly twice the Union.130 The country’s top 10 companies quantity of chicken that it exports.125 account for 85 per cent of poultry exports. The same companies lead in pork exports, feeding poultry and pigs on soymeal to keep costs low.131 22
Soybean equivalent required to produce a UK citizen’s average annual intake of meat and dairy products (in kilograms per person) 5.6 1.7 6.7 22.2 12.5 1.9 3.8 Fig 4. Van 1.7 Gelder et al, Soy Consumption for Feed and Fuel 0 5 10 15 20 25 in the European Union, October 2008 Kilograms per person Broiler farm istock 23
2 WHAT’S DRIVING LIVESTOCK EXPANSION? Dairy production The role of agribusiness Global finance Most of the UK’s dairy herd are Holstein- Corporations involved in the soy trade are The rapid expansion in soy production Friesians which have been bred to yield key drivers of expansion and intensive has also been facilitated by multilateral between 5 and 10,000 litres of milk a production. US companies Bunge and banks, including the World Bank and the year.134 Soy is an important source of Cargill (the world’s largest commodity Inter-American Development Bank, who protein in their diet – even during the trader) dominate the soy industry in are keen to encourage agriculture for summer when grass is available, animal Brazil and Argentina, buying the beans export. feed constitutes around half of their food. from farmers, running crushing mills and The International Financial Corporation Varying quantities of soy are used in exporting soymeal and oil to the UK and (IFC), which is part of the World Bank, dairy cattle feed, but estimates suggest it the rest of Europe. provides investment in the livestock can make up as much as 10 per cent.135 Cargill also runs crushing mills for soy sector, and its approach has been Each year we consume an average of and rape seed in the UK.139 Archer Daniel criticised by the World Bank’s former 118 litres of milk per person in the UK,136 Midland (ADM), Dreyfus and Brazilian environmental director Robert Goodland. 3.6kg of butter, and 10.2kg of cheese.137 company André Maggi are important According to Goodland, the IFC has Most of this milk is sourced from UK players in Brazil. contributed $732 million (around £460 dairy farms, but significant proportions Trading companies, like Cargill and million) to damaging livestock projects of butter, cheese and yoghurt are Bunge, have a crucial role in controlling in South America, Asia and Eastern imported.138 the whole soy production process Europe, of which $36.6 million (around because farmers depend on them to £23 million) would have come from British provide credit and supplies of fertiliser tax payers.140 and pesticides. These companies also One of these projects involved a $90 manage the logistics, arranging storage, million loan to Bertin Ltda, one of Brazil’s transport and processing. leading beef and leather producers, to Although the largest public UK fund the expansion of the Bertin Amazon companies are required to report on their Cattle Ranching project, which poses a environmental and social impacts under recognised risk of deforestation in the the Companies Act 2006, there are no Amazon. The IFC funding enabled the standards in place that dictate how they project to secure $250 million (around should report and few actually provide £158 million) in further loans from the comprehensive information on their Inter-American Development Bank. activities. 24
UK taxpayers’ money is also being Dominating the soy feed chain Soy certification used to finance intensive livestock US commodity trader Cargill owns one Soy certification schemes are production through the European Bank of the UK’s main chicken processing increasingly being proposed as a way of Reconstruction and Development companies, Sun Valley. The company of managing the damaging impacts (EBRD). The EBRD has provided funding operates across Europe and processes of production. The Round Table on for thousands of agricultural projects in around 1 million chickens a week in the Responsible Soy (RTRS) was established central Europe, including a contribution UK. Customers include McDonalds and in November 2006, representing different of £7.8 million to intensive livestock supermarket chain Morrisons. stakeholders from the industry, with the production in 2007-08. Sun Valley chickens are fed on Cargill big soy producers dominant.141 NGOs British and European banks play an soy, imported through the company’s in Latin America have largely rejected important part in financing the soy trade plant in Liverpool, 25 per cent of which is or boycotted certification and most by holding shares and providing finance sourced from Brazil. schemes have failed to consult with for key companies: affected communities while developing s Barclays has investments in ADM, their criteria. The RTRS has so far only Bunge and Cargill. established draft criteria, but these do not s Barclays and HSBC both provide take into account the damaging impacts credit for ADM and Bunge. of soy expansion. An earlier attempt s HSBC and the Royal Bank of at setting a sustainability standard led Scotland hold bonds in Cargill. to the Basel Criteria142 – a broad set of principles which can be applied to local schemes. Pro Terra is the only Brazilian scheme in operation that meets the Friends of the Earth/Clare Oxborrow Basel Criteria and there is relatively little Basel-accredited soy available on the market.143 The UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office has invested £236,520 in a soy certification project in Brazil aimed at reducing deforestation.144 While the scheme was successful in reducing deforestation rates, there are concerns that such schemes displace problems and disregard property and land rights.145 Questions remain about the enforcement of sustainability standards for any scheme. Evidence suggests that criteria Cargill soy-processing plant, Paraguay will be used to justify expansion while having little impact on the methods of production or the macro effects of large- scale expansion. 25
Agricultural policy and soy The European Union currently spends UK and European agricultural policies £34 billion each year on the CAP, of have played a key role in developing which £3.4 billion comes from the UK – Europe’s reliance on imported soy the equivalent of £500 per family. Around for animal feed. When the Common 88 per cent of this is spent on direct aid Soybeans are harvested at Fartura Farm, Agricultural Policy (CAP) was established to farming and food production. The rest in Mato Grosso state, Brazil, March 2008 in Europe in 1962, it established an is used to protect farmers from sudden agreement with the United States that drops in market prices. animal feed would not be subject to Farmers receive funds according to import tariffs. the size of the farm, meaning large-scale Under the CAP, the European farmers and agribusinesses receive most Community effectively guaranteed prices of the aid – 80 per cent of funds reach for most European farm produce when just 20 per cent of farms. the market price fell below an agreed In 2002, more than 60 per cent of the target level. This encouraged farmers CAP budget went to livestock-related to focus on producing cereals, milk, production. Following changes in the beef and sugar – where the price was way payments were made, it is no longer guaranteed – and to import animal feed. possible to know how much money goes This meant that land previously used to to livestock production, but 14 of the top grow feed was converted to produce 20 UK recipients are involved in dairy cereals.146 production. As a result, Europe became dependent For example, Meadow Foods, a leading on soy imports, initially from the United manufacturer of bulk fats and proteins States. Attempts to reform the CAP met used in ice cream, spreads, sports drinks, with considerable resistance from the processed meats and confectionery, United States and the European animal received nearly £26 million in 2003-04. feed industry. In 1992, European farmers limited the amount of oilseed that they could grow by signing a 10-year deal with the United States.147 When this expired BSE was already having an impact on farming – in 1996, the use of meat and bone meal in animal feed had been banned and farmers turned to soy as an alternative protein source. Corbis 26
Farmers receive subsidy funding according to their size so large- scale farmers and agri-business receive most of the aid. 27
3 SOLUTIONS It is clear that the current model Less intensive production systems and of livestock production is no longer a greater reliance on organic production affordable in environmental or social can reduce the damaging environmental terms. The climate, water systems, soil effects of over-reliance on pesticides and and wildlife cannot sustain the damage other inputs, as well as reducing farmers’ that is being caused. costs. There are increasing pressures on land However, a switch to more sustainable use. Our demand for food is growing in livestock systems will necessitate an line with the world population and there is overall reduction in livestock production an urgent need to maintain our forest and and consumption. grasslands and to prevent the erosion of The considerable environmental and soils. social damage caused by the livestock Soy is not the only available source sector requires a significant policy of vegetable proteins suitable for animal response. There is no single policy that feed. Alternatives include hemp, lupins, can address the complex factors driving legumes and oilseed rape. Many of unsustainable consumption. Action these are already produced in the UK from governments in producing and and some are suitable for production consuming countries will be required to on farms, reducing the need for initiate the necessary changes across the transportation. For example, in France whole supply chain. peas are grown for use in pig and poultry Friends of the Earth has identified feed. eight key policy areas where action by A more localised system of food the UK Government, including changes production – using animal feed grown in to UK and European policy, could help Europe to feed animals reared in Europe to significantly reduce the impact of our – would help to reduce the devastating livestock consumption. impacts of habitat loss in Latin America, as well as reducing the climate-changing emissions generated by land use change and transporting vast quantities of feed. Local food production also encourages the production of a wider range of food crops, locally-appropriate diets, greater local control over food supplies and less Forest and organic farm in Altos, price volatility for farmers. run by Sobrevivencia/Friends of the Earth Paraguay for training and education 28
“If we are serious about tackling food-related greenhouse gas emissions, we need to consider making significant reductions in our overall production of livestock products, while seeking to maximise the benefits that livestock can bring.” Food Climate Research Network 2007 Changes to agricultural Changes to the Government’s 1 and rural policy 2 food procurement policy The UK currently spends large amounts Around £2.2 billion of public money of taxpayers’ money subsidising is currently spent on food in schools, damaging large-scale intensive food hospitals, prisons and care homes. Little production, processing and export consideration is given to where this food through the CAP. comes from or its wider impacts, despite The Government must work within the Government’s Public Sector Food Europe to transform the CAP objectives Procurement Initiative. A ‘cheapest is (as set out in Article 33 of the Treaty best’ approach dominates. of Rome) to reflect the wider needs of The Government must introduce new sustainable modern farming policy with enabling legislation by 2012 to ensure reduced greenhouse gas emissions. that food procurement in the public The subsidies which underpin intensive sector: complies with carbon reduction livestock farming 148 should be removed. targets and national environmental New measures must be introduced to legislation; does not damage biodiversity; promote low-impact livestock systems, and supports local sustainable organic the domestic production of sustainable livestock production where possible. feeds, and research into the introduction Such measures are already in use as of different livestock breeds better suited some local authorities and NHS trusts to a new feeding regime.149 are finding ways to reduce the levels of A sustainable livestock system, with meat and dairy in the meals they provide locally-grown feed, will lead to reduced in schools and hospitals.150 livestock consumption. The UK does In the Netherlands, the government has not have sufficient agricultural land to set a target of 100 per cent sustainable grow the levels of feed crops it currently food procurement by 2010. A similar consumes. Investment is needed UK government policy could deliver real in raising public awareness of the environmental and health benefits, while environmental impact of intensive meat also influencing the European green and dairy production and the health procurement policy currently being benefits of eating less meat. discussed in the European Council and Support and incentives must be made Parliament.151 available to farmers to help them adopt less environmentally damaging practices while maintaining a thriving UK industry Clare Oxborrow/Friends of the Earth – it is crucial that farmers receive a fair price for their produce. 29
Clare Oxborrow/Friends of the Earth 3 Clare Oxborrow/Friends of the Earth Solar panel for drying fruit at sustainable Sustainable agricultural college students show agricultural college in Itapua, Paraguay Sobrevivencia/Friends of the Earth Paraguay pigs’ swill made from scrap food and other farm waste Changes to global Addressing climate change Funding for research 3 investment policy 4 policy and impacts 5 and development UK public money is funding damaging The Climate Change Act requires the In recognising the urgent need for intensive livestock production through Government to find ways of substantially new ways of farming to reduce global the World Bank’s International Financial reducing greenhouse gas emissions greenhouse gas emissions and Corporation (IFC), the European Bank of from the food sector, particularly from biodiversity impact, the government Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) UK livestock farming. Measures already must increase public funding (or redirect and the Foreign and Commonwealth being considered include reducing the existing funds, such as those destined Office’s Strategic Programme Fund. This number of animals and using maize for agricultural biotechnology research) support contradicts the World Bank’s own silage for beef and dairy farming to for research into modern sustainable policies, including the Livestock Strategy, improve dairy yields. Ireland, Poland, farming systems which use lower levels which stipulates that no funding should Austria and Belgium are already of livestock and inputs and which be directed towards industrial livestock addressing livestock numbers as a maximise the potential for mixed farming. production. means of meeting environmental This research needs to investigate The Government must commit to goals.153 changes to livestock breeds, feed plant ensuring that, within two years, public However, the Act does not take varieties and cropping systems to deliver money is no longer invested – via the into account the global impacts of a UK farming system that matches need World Bank, the EBRD, or other financial importing food or animal feed. The with environmental, rural development institutions – in intensive livestock Government must look at effective and public health goals. farming systems which depend on high measures for reducing our unsustainable To facilitate this research and to levels of imported feed. The Government dependence on imported feeds. As provide an appropriate and well-funded must also use its governance role within part of this, the Government must push institutional setting, the government the World Bank to ensure that the IFC for equitable solutions to forest loss should set up a Sustainable Agricultural adheres to World Bank policy. through agricultural expansion and over Research Council. The UK must stop promoting soy consumption at international climate Organic mixed farming systems in the certification schemes which facilitate talks.154 UK provide a valuable base from which to large-scale production and expansion The impact of agriculture on climate start as they have benefited from a period with little reference to the wider change must also be a primary of considerable investment in breeding, impacts.152 consideration in future European cropping and input testing to maximise discussion on the CAP to ensure that outputs whilst minimising impacts. Public it includes financial support for climate funds must also be directed into finding adaptation measures. ways to help consumers choose diets containing lower levels of livestock products. 30
You can also read