VIABILITY EVALUATION-Bayworld/Happy Valley and Telkom Park.
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
VIABILITY EVALUATION- Bayworld/Happy Valley and Telkom Park.
1. Background.
The MBDA has been mandated by the Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality as a transdisciplinary
implementing agent for programmes, projects and events within its 6 mandated areas, which are to be
aligned to the various plans of the NMBM.
The Happy Valley Programme which includes Telkom Park, Bayworld and the green lung of Happy Valley
itself, is one such programme which is located within the PE CENTRAL/BAAKENS/HAPPY VALLEY mandate
area.
The MBDA has recognised that the Happy Valley Precinct, when linked to the Baakens Valley Development
and Proposed Waterfront, is uniquely positioned to become a new, inclusive heart for Nelson Mandela Bay
and has approached the redevelopment with that objective. The intent is that the precinct should be
socially, spatially and economically transformed into an inclusive, post-apartheid precinct that enables
multi-generational, multi-cultural and mixed income usages. It is envisaged that a unique tourism
opportunity will be created through the activation of the green lung, an ICC developed within the precinct,
Bayworld be repurposed and that an inclusive housing development be part of a new model for the precinct.
The opportunity of developing the precinct as a green, smart and off the grid destination will be pursued.
The MBDA wishes to appoint a Professional Economist to undertake a Viability Evaluation of the Precinct.
1.1. Problem Analysis of the Precinct
• The Happy Valley Precinct is an underutilized parcel of land within the inner city economic node;
• The precinct is unsafe and home to a large group of homeless people and others fleeing from the law;
• The precinct is prone to severe flooding from time to time;
• There are limited resources within the NMBM to upgrade the land and improve the infrastructure;
• The valley is abandoned and neglected;
• A once popular tourism attraction, it is currently not utilised to its full potential;
• The green lung has not been exploited to its maximum;
• It is constrained with environmentally sensitives areas.
1.2. Objectives Analysis of the Precinct
• The precinct should be socially, spatially and economically transformed into an inclusive, post-
apartheid precinct that enables multi-generational, multi-cultural and mixed LSM usages;
• The precinct should be spatially transformed to become a tourism opportunity, through the activation
of the green lung;
• The conservation and integrity of the eco-systems should be maintained and harnessed;
Mandela Bay Development Agency
Directors: R Dana, AJF Gardiner, MW Goduka (Chairperson), K Govender, B Gxilishe, R Kisten, SM Mbanga, M Odayar
Company Secretary: M Matiwane• The opportunity of developing the precinct as a green, smart and off the grid destination, should be
pursued;
• The development of the precinct should contribute to creating NEW jobs which can impact positively on
the unemployment figure within NMB;
• The precinct needs to be integrated into the NMBM ensuring connectivity and access for all citizens of
the NMBM;
• Environmental best practice should be applied to transforming the precinct;
• Understand the opportunities for social and economic transformation that is triggered by being a coastal
city, particularly within the Oceans Economy, should be ensured.
1.3. Potential Analysis of the Precinct
• A precinct that is rich in the green, the cultural and the built environment heritage;
• A large tract of municipally owned land that is available for development;
• Many transport systems converge within walking distance of the precinct including air, taxis, busses,
cars, pedestrian, cycle;
• Opportunity residential units, retail and a green lung that can be activated for leisure and sport;
• A unique natural bio-diversity and port environment which can be harnessed;
• A Tourism market which can be expanded and encouraged to stay an extra day;
• A potential innovation centre for the composite sector which is developing in NMBM;
• A strategic competitive advantage that is provided by the convergence of The Baakens River Precinct,
The Waterfront and the Happy Valley Precinct.
1.4 Goal of the NMBM/MBDA
• All available and accessible municipal land, not within the 100year flood line is built on to a medium
density;
• Transformation of the green lung to showcase the biodiversity of the Eastern Cape;
• The existence of eco-conservation initiatives and leisure opportunities within the green lung;
• A multi-faceted tourism product for the city;
• Increased number of international tourists visiting the precinct;
• An inclusive precinct in terms of mixed housing opportunities;
• An increase in new jobs created through the development;
• A safer recreational precinct;
• Improved access to the precinct in terms of mobility, social and recreational access for all citizens of the
NMBM.
2. The Viability Evaluation
The successful bidder will be required to familiarise themselves with the conceptual framework for
Bayworld, the Telkom Park Precinct Plan and any other relevant studies undertaken on the precinct to date,
including the Happy Valley Local Spatial Development Framework (LSDF) (2010); They are to familiarise
themselves with the Capital Planning Guidelines from National Treasury (June 2018) and align their
quotations and scope of work to fulfilling the recommendations applicable to the Happy Valley/Telkom
Park/Bayworld Precinct;
2.1 Conduct a socio-economic analysis
This must include but not be limited to:
• The identification of potential benefits to Black Economic Empowerment, Small Medium and Micro-
sized enterprises (SMME) as well as community in general;
2• The potential impact of a multi-income, multi-generational and multi-cultural new model of
development on social and spatial transformation needs to be identified;
• The potential demand for affordable housing;
• The potential increase in land values needs to be established;
• The extent of opportunity for EME’s local labour and materials;
2.2 Conduct a financial analysis
• This must include a financial model projecting the cash flows for the costs and any revenue generated
from the project over its lifetime;
• The financial model must be informed by all the lifecycle costs to develop the identified outputs and
should include operating costs and revenues;
• The potential sources of funding;
• Life cycle capital or construction costs as well as annual operating and maintenance costs.
2.3 Conduct an Economic Impact Assessment
2.4 Conduct a Cost Benefit Analysis/Cost effectiveness Analysis
2.5 Conduct an Economic Impact Analysis
2.6 Conduct a risk assessment
3. Deliverables Required
3.1 A comprehensive report tabled in 3 hardcopies and 2 soft copies including:
3.2 The service provider will be required to work closely with other members of the team working on the
Bayworld/Telkom Park/Happy Valley Programme
4. Time Frame
The Viability Evaluation process is anticipated to take 6-8 weeks. Work should commence immediately on
appointment. A draft report should be completed by 31 May 2019 and a final report by 15 June 2019.
5. Proof of skills required
Only service providers with the necessary experience will be considered. The successful service provider
should have demonstrable experience of undertaking Viability Analysis. The following must be provided in
order to be considered:
5.1 A CV of the MAIN APPLICANT detailing similar processes undertaken to date;
5.2 No subcontracting of the Services will be allowed;
5.3 Contact numbers and email addresses of 5 companies that may be contacted to provide references to
work undertaken for them, by the preferred Service Provider.
6. Compulsory Briefing Session
A compulsory briefing session will be held on 3 April 2019 at 13:30 at the MBDA offices at the Tramsway
Building.
7. Requirements of the applicant
• The applicant must make provision in their costing proposal for all costs related to the services
required. It should be noted that it is the responsibility of the tenderer to ensure that provision has
3been made accordingly, and that costs of those services are factored into the tender submission as
no further budget variations will be permitted;
• The Registered Economist, whose experience has been submitted to score this category must be the
professional engaged in this project;
• The Main Applicant must be the Registered Economist;
• The professional (Main Applicant) whose experience has been submitted must be permanently based
in Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality;
• The Registered Economist must be a permanent Employee of the Company where the Company is
the Main Applicant; (Proof of this must be submitted)
8. Legal Compliance
• All applicants must take note of Annexure A – Functionality Criteria and submit documents as
required. Applicants must obtain a minimum score of 60 points out of 100 points, failing which
their tender will be deemed non-responsive;
• All applicants must be registered on National Treasury Central Supplier Database (CSD);
• Bidders need to be registered with the NMBM or provide proof that they have registered, and
that the application is in process.
• All applicants must complete the attached declarations (MBD 4) and (MBD 9);
• Applicants must submit a copy of their tax clearance certificate or Tax Pin; No awards will be made
to service providers who are not tax compliant.
• Applicants must submit a copy of either BBBEE certificate or Sworn Affidavit (DTI prescribed
format); Failure to submit this document will mean no points will be allocated in the 80/20
preferential points scoring.
• Applicants must note that this is an Informal Tender and no costing proposal exceeding R200, 000
inclusive of VAT, will be considered;
• If a Joint Venture is formed with a company and it is not a signed agreement, the relevant
documents required above must be submitted for both parties;
4ANNEXURE “A”
FUNCTIONALITY CRITERIA SCORE SHEET
FUNCTIONALITY CRITERIA
1. Relevant experience 75
- The Main Applicant involved in project must demonstrate having
relevant experience in respect of similar strategic processes
a) Greater than 10 years 75
b) 5 to 10 years 55
c) Less than 5 years 40
Proof or name(s) of traceable reference (s), CV’s and or company profiles
and contact details must be provided failing which this functionality
criteria will not be considered, and zero points scored. Please complete
Annexure B
3. Locality 25
a) Based within Nelson Mandela Bay (local office / branch) 25
b) Based within Eastern Cape 10
c) Other provinces 5
Total 100
A minimum of 60% must be scored for bidders to proceed to the next stage of evaluation.
5ANNEXURE “B”
The information required must be submitted in the following format:
EXPERIENCE:
Project Name and description Project Value Contract period Contact person, email address and number
in R for reference purposes
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
6________________________________________________________________________
Declaration of Interest (MBD4)
________________________________________________________________________
1. No Bid will be accepted from persons in the service of the state¹.
2. Any person, having a kinship with persons in the service of the state, including a blood
relationship, may make an offer or offers in terms of this invitation to Bid. In view of possible
allegations of favouritism, should the resulting Bid, or part thereof, be awarded to persons
connected with or related to persons in service of the state, it is required that the Bidder or their
authorised representative declare their position in relation to the evaluating/adjudicating
authority.
3. In order to give effect to the above, the following questionnaire must be completed and
submitted with the Bid.
3.1. Full Name of Bidder or his or her representative: ……………………………………………..
3.2. Identity Number: ………………………………………………………………………………….
3.3. Position occupied in the Company (director, trustee, shareholder²):
………………………………………………………………………….………………………..
3.4. Company Registration Number: …………………………………………………………….
3.5. Tax Reference Number: …………………………………………………………………………
3.6. VAT Registration Number: …………………………………………………………………….
3.7. The names of all directors / trustees / shareholders members, their individual identity
numbers and state employee numbers must be indicated in paragraph 4 below.
3.8. Are you presently in the service of the state? YES / NO
3.8.1. If yes, furnish particulars. ….……………………………………………………………
¹MSCM Regulations: “in the service of the state” means to be –
(a) a member of –
(i) any municipal council;
(ii) any provincial legislature; or
(iii) the national Assembly or the national Council of provinces;
(b) a member of the board of directors of any municipal entity;
(c) an official of any municipality or municipal entity;
(d) an employee of any national or provincial department, national or provincial public entity or constitutional institution within the meaning of the
Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No.1 of 1999);
(e) a member of the accounting authority of any national or provincial public entity; or
(f) an employee of Parliament or a provincial legislature.
² Shareholder” means a person who owns shares in the company and is actively involved in the management of the company or business and
exercises control over the company.
73.9. Have you been in the service of the state for the past twelve months? YES / NO
3.9.1 If yes, furnish particulars.………………………...……………………………………..
3.10 Do you have any relationship (family, friend, other) with persons
in the service of the state and who may be involved with
the evaluation and or adjudication of this Bid? …………………………… YES / NO
3.10.1 If yes, furnish particulars.………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
3.11 Are you, aware of any relationship (family, friend, other) between
any other Bidder and any persons in the service of the state who
may be involved with the evaluation and or adjudication of this Bid? YES / NO
3.11.1 If yes, furnish particulars …………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………….……............................................................
3.12 Are any of the company’s directors, trustees, managers,
principle shareholders or stakeholders in service of the state? YES /NO
3.12.1 If yes, furnish particulars.…………………………………………………………
………….….…………………………………………………………………………………………….
3.13 Are any spouse, child or parent of the company’s directors
trustees, managers, principle shareholders or stakeholders
in service of the state? YES / NO
3.13.1 If yes, furnish particulars.……………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
3.14 Do you or any of the directors, trustees, managers,
principle shareholders, or stakeholders of this company
have any interest in any other related companies or
business whether or not they are Bidding for this contract. YES / NO
3.14.1 If yes, furnish particulars………………………………………………………..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
3.15 Are you or any of the directors, trustees, managers,
principle shareholders, or stakeholders of this company an advisor or consultant
8contracted with the NMBMM or the MBDA YES / NO
3.15.1 If yes, furnish particulars………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
4. Full details of directors / trustees / members / shareholders.
Full Name Identity Number State Employee
Number
………………………………….. ……………………………………..
Signature Date
In the presence of:
1.
2.
9CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTNESS
I, THE UNDERSIGNED (NAME) ………………………………………………………………………
CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED ON THIS DECLARATION FORM IS CORRECT.
I ACCEPT THAT THE STATE MAY ACT AGAINST ME SHOULD THIS DECLARATION PROVE TO BE FALSE
Signature………………… Date……………………
……………………………… …………………………………………………………..
Position Name of Bidder
10________________________________________________________________________
CERTIFICATE OF INDEPENDENT BID DETERMINATION (MBD9)
________________________________________________________________________
I, the undersigned, in submitting the accompanying Proposal in relation to
___________________________________________________________________________
hereby make the following statements that I certify to be true and complete in every respect:
I certify, on behalf of: _______________________________________________________that:
(Name of Applicant)
1. I have read and I understand the contents of this Certificate;
2. I understand that the accompanying Proposal will be disqualified if this Certificate is found not
to be true and complete in every respect;
3. I am authorized by the Applicant to sign this Certificate, and to submit the accompanying
proposal, on behalf of the Applicant;
4. Each person whose signature appears on the accompanying Proposal has been authorized by
the Applicant to determine the terms of, and to sign, the Proposal, on behalf of the Applicant;
5. For the purposes of this Certificate and the accompanying Proposal, I understand that the
word “competitor” shall include any individual or organization, other than the Applicant,
whether or not affiliated with the Applicant, who:
(a) has been requested to submit a Proposal in response to this RFP;
(b) could potentially submit a proposal in response to this RFP, based on
their qualifications, abilities or experience; and
(c) provides the same goods and services as the Applicant and/or is in the same line of
business as the Applicant.
6. The Applicant has arrived at the accompanying Proposal independently from, and without
consultation, communication, agreement or arrangement with any competitor. However,
communication between partners in a joint venture or consortium will not be construed as
collusive bidding.
117. In particular, without limiting the generality of paragraphs 6 above, there has been no
consultation, communication, agreement or arrangement with any competitor regarding:
(a) prices;
(b) methods, factors or formulas used to calculate prices;
(c) the intention or decision to submit or not to submit, a Proposal;
(d) the submission of a Proposal which does not meet the specifications and conditions of
the Proposal; or
(e) submitting a Proposal with the intention not to win the award.
8. In addition, there have been no consultations, communications, agreements or arrangements
with any competitor regarding the quality, quantity, specifications and conditions or delivery
particulars of the improvements to which this Proposal relates.
9. The terms of the accompanying Proposal have not been, and will not be, disclosed by the
Applicant, directly or indirectly, to any competitor, prior to the date and time of the official
opening of proposals or the awarding of the contract.
10. The Applicant (including any individual Applicant), and no member of the Applicant (if the
Applicant is a Close Corporation), and no director and/or shareholder of the Applicant (if the
Applicant is a Company), and no Trustee and/or beneficiary of the Applicant (if the Applicant
is a Trust), and no person, including juristic persons (and including such juristic person’s
members, directors and/or shareholders, trustees and/or beneficiaries) having an interest in
any Joint Venture Vehicle or Consortium constituting the Applicant has any interest in any
competitor.
11. I am aware that, in addition and without prejudice to any other remedy provided to combat
any restrictive practices related to bids, proposals and contracts, proposals that are suspicious
will be reported to the Competition Commission for investigation and possible imposition of
administrative penalties in terms of section 59 of the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998 and or
may be reported to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) for criminal investigation and or
may be restricted from conducting business with the public sector for a period not exceeding
ten (10) years in terms of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act No. 12 of
2004 or any other applicable legislation.
_______________________
Signature Date
_______________________
Name of Applicant
12You can also read
