What Everyone Ought to Know About the 2021 Promise Neighborhoods Competition - U.S. Department of Education Tuesday, February 2, 2020
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
What Everyone Ought to Know About the 2021 Promise Neighborhoods Competition U.S. Department of Education Tuesday, February 2, 2020
Agenda • Welcome • Background Overview ▫ Statute ▫ Purpose ▫ History and Previous Grantees ▫ Key Dates ▫ Process ▫ What’s New • Priorities ▫ Absolute Priorities ▫ Competitive Preference Priorities ▫ Invitational Priority • Selection Criteria • Application • Review Process • Questions and Answers • Closing
Background: Statute • The Promise Neighborhoods program is authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA). • Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7273–7274 • All applicants are strongly encouraged to read the program statute prior to submitting a proposal for the FY 2021 Promise Neighborhoods competition.
Background: Purpose • The purpose of the Promise Neighborhoods program is to significantly improve the academic and developmental outcomes of children living in the most distressed communities of the United States, including ensuring school readiness, high school graduation, and access to a community-based continuum of high-quality services. • The program serves neighborhoods with high concentrations of low-income individuals; multiple signs of distress, which may include high rates of poverty, childhood obesity, academic failure, and juvenile delinquency, adjudication, or incarceration; and schools implementing comprehensive support and improvement activities or targeted support and improvement activities. • All strategies in the continuum of solutions must be accessible to children with disabilities and English learners.
Background Overview: History & Previous Grantees Fiscal Year Type of Award Number of New Awards FY 2018 Implementation 6 FY 2017 Implementation 4 FY 2016 Implementation 6 FY 2012 Planning 10 FY 2012 Implementation 7 FY 2011 Planning 15 FY 2011 Implementation 5 FY 2010 Planning 21 https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-discretionary-grants-support-services/school-choice-improvement-programs/promise-neighborhoods-pn/awards/
Background Overview: Key Dates Action/ Activity Date Application Available Tuesday, January 19, 2021 Webinar I Friday, January 29, 2021 Promise Neighborhoods Program 101: What is the Promise Neighborhoods Program? 1:00pm (EST) – 2:30pm (EST) Webinar II Monday, February 1, 2021 Nuts & Bolts of the FY 2021 Promise Neighborhoods Competition 1:00pm (EST) – 2:30pm (EST) Webinar III Tuesday, February 2, 2021 What Everyone Ought to Know about the FY 2021 Promise Neighborhoods Competition 1:00pm (EST) – 2:30pm (EST) Webinar IV Wednesday, February 3, 2021 Money, Money, Money & More 1:00pm (EST) – 2:30pm (EST) Intent to Apply (strongly encouraged) Wednesday, February 3, 2021 1:00pm (EST) – 2:30pm (EST) Webinar V Thursday, February 4, 2021 Strategies, Resources, & Tips on How to Incorporate Evidence and Evaluation into Your Proposed Project 1:00pm (EST) – 2:30pm (EST) Closing Date Friday, March 5, 2021
Background Overview: Process Collaborate and Attend Webinar V: Applications Coordinate with Available Evidence & ALL Partners Evaluation (ongoing) Attend Webinar Submit Intent to Read the NFP, IV: Apply NIA, and Application Money, Money, (strongly Money & More encouraged) You Are Here Attend Webinar Collaborate and Identify and Meet III: Coordinate with with ALL Partners What Everyone ALL Partners (ongoing) Ought to Know (ongoing) Attend Webinar Attend Webinar I: II: Create Proposal Submit PN Program 101 with ALL Partners Application Nuts & Bolts 45 DAYS
9 2021 PN Priorities Competitive Absolute Priorities Preference Priorities Invitational Priority (AP) (CPP) CPP1 AP1 Community-Level Opioid Abuse Non-Rural and Prevention Efforts Non-Tribal Communities CPP2 Spurring Investment in Qualified IP AP2 Opportunity Zones Community-Based Crime Rural Reduction Efforts Applicants CPP3 Applications from New Potential Grantees AP3 CPP4 Tribal Communities Evidence-Based Activities to Support Academic Achievement
10 Absolute Priority 1 • Non-Rural and Non-Tribal Communities ▫ To meet this priority, an applicant must propose to implement a PN strategy that serves one or more nonrural or non-Tribal communities.
11 Absolute Priority 2 • Rural Applicants ▫ To meet this priority an applicant must demonstrate one or more of the following: (a) The applicant proposes to serve a local educational agency (LEA) that is eligible under the Small Rural School Achievement (SRSA) program or the Rural and Low-Income School (RLIS) program authorized under Title V, Part B of the ESEA. (b) The applicant proposes to serve a community that is served by one or more LEAs with a locale code of 32, 33, 41, 42, or 43.
12 Absolute Priority 2 • Rural Applicants ▫ An applicant must demonstrate one or more of the following (con’t): (c) The applicant proposes a project in which a majority of the schools served have a locale code of 32, 33, 41, 42, or 43. (d) The applicant is an institution of higher education (IHE) with a rural campus setting, or the applicant proposes to serve a campus with a rural setting. Rural settings include any of the following: Town-Fringe, Town- Distant, Town-Remote, Rural Fringe, Rural Distant, Rural- Remote, as defined by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) College Navigator search tool.
13 Absolute Priority 2 • Rural Applicants ▫ Resources https://oese.ed.gov/ offices/office-of-formula- grants/rural-insularnative-achievement- programs/ruraleducation-achievement-program/ https:// nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/ https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/ https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/
14 Absolute Priority 3 • Tribal Communities ▫ To meet this priority, an applicant must propose to implement a PN strategy that serves one or more Indian Tribes
15 Competitive Preference Priorities • There are four Competitive Preference Priorities for this competition. • Applicants are able to apply to all four CPPs. • Applicants must identify in the project narrative section of its application the CPP(s) it wishes the Department to consider. • The Department will not award points under any CPP for an application that fails to clearly identify the CPP(s) it wishes the Department to consider for purposes of earning the competitive preference priority points.
16 Competitive Preference Priority Points •Up to 10 additional points
17 Competitive Preference Priority 1 • Community-Level Opioid Abuse Prevention Efforts ▫ 0 to 3 points ▫ To meet this priority, an applicant must: 1. Demonstrate how it will partner with an organization that conducts high-quality, community-level activities to prevent opioid abuse, such as an organization supported by an Office of National Drug Control Policy, Drug-Free Communities Support Program grant, in PN communities; 2. Describe the partner organization’s record of success in approaching opioid abuse prevention at the community level; and 3. Provide, in its application, a memorandum of understanding between it and the partner organization responsible for managing the effort. The memorandum of understanding must indicate a commitment on the part of the applicant to coordinate implementation and align resources to the greatest extent practicable.
18 Competitive Preference Priority 2 • Spurring Investment in Qualified Opportunity Zones ▫ 0 to 3 points ▫ Applicants must demonstrate that the area in which the applicant proposes to provide services overlaps with a Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ), as designated by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 1400Z–1 of the Internal Revenue Code. ▫ Applicants must: 1. Provide the census tract number of the QOZ(s) in which it proposes to provide services (1 point); and 2. Describe how the applicant will provide services in the QOZ(s) (Up to 2 points).
19 Competitive Preference Priority 3 • Applications from New Potential Grantees ▫ 0 or 1 point ▫ Applicants must demonstrate that it has never received a grant, including through membership in a group application submitted in accordance with 34 CFR 75.127–75.129, under the program from which it seeks funds.
20 Competitive Preference Priority 4 • Evidence-Based Activities to Support Academic Achievement ▫ 0 to 3 points ▫ Projects that propose to use evidence-based (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c)) activities, strategies, or interventions that support teaching practices that will lead to increasing student achievement graduation rates, and career readiness.
21 Invitational Priority • Community-Based Crime Reduction Efforts ▫ To meet this priority, an applicant must: 1. Demonstrate how it will partner with an organization that conducts high-quality activities focused on the re-entry of formerly incarcerated individuals or on community-based crime reduction activities, such as an organization supported by a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Innovations in Community-Based Crime Reduction Program grant, a grant authorized under the Second Chance Act, as reauthorized under the Formerly Incarcerated Reenter Society Transformed Safely Transitioning Every Person (FIRST STEP) Act, or DOJ Office of Justice Programs competitive grants related to juvenile justice and delinquency prevention; 2. Describe the partner organization’s record of success with supporting the re-entry of formerly incarcerated individuals or community-based crime reduction and how their efforts will be coordinated with the PN activities of this grant; and 3. Provide, in its application, a memorandum of understanding between it and a partner organization managing the effort. The memorandum of understanding must indicate a commitment on the part of the applicant to coordinate implementation and align resources to the greatest extent practicable.
2021 Promise Neighborhoods Selection Criteria
23 Selection Criteria Need for project (up to 20 points) Quality of Adequacy of project resources services (up to 15 points) Up to (up to 30 points) 100 Points Quality of the Quality of management project plan design (Up to 15 (up to 20 points) points)
24 Need for project (up to 20 points) • In determining the need for the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors: 1. The magnitude or severity of the problems to be addressed by the proposed project as described by indicators of need and other relevant indicators identified in part by the needs assessment and segmentation analysis (up to 5 points); 2. The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services, infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be addressed by the proposed project, including— 1. The nature and magnitude of those gaps or weaknesses (up to 5 points); and 2. A pipeline of solutions addressing the identified gaps and weaknesses, including solutions targeted to early childhood, K– 12, family and community supports, and college and career (up to 10 points).
25 Optional Needs and Solution Table Need Data Source(s) Specific Gaps and Proposed Solution(s) Solution Description Pipeline Area(s) Provider(s) and/ or Weaknesses in to Address Specific Partner(s) (Birth, Early Childhood, K- Services Gaps and Weaknesses 3, 3-5, Middle School, High in Services School, Post-Secondary, Workforce, Family and Community, Health and Wellness, Safety, Stable Communities, and 21st Century Learning Tools) Example Example Example Example Example Example Example Accessible transit 2020 Survey of Adult The existing on demand Partner with the existing Enhancement of the Family and ABC County Department service. residents transit provider requires transit provider to reservation system that Community, Health of Transportation, XYZ • 5% of residents online reservations that improve access. allows reservation by and Wellness, Stable Town Office of the live in walking must be completed at landline phone. Reduce Communities, K-3, 3- Mayor, GHI City Office distance to a least 24 hours before a the notice period required 5, Middle School, of Transportation, ABC grocery store trip is takes place . This for a trip to 12 hours. High School. County Ministers’ • 3% of children provider also denies Eliminate the penalty for Alliance, PQR Town live in walking service to residents that missed appointments. Office of the Mayor, 123 distance to miss 3 appointments, does Expand service to Bus Service, ABC County their school not operate after 7:00 pm, 11:00pm and to other Schools, State • 1% of residents and does not serve some areas needed for Department of live in walking areas residents live in or residents and health care Transportation distance to a need to travel to. Yellow providers. medical school bus service is provider limited to regular school • 20% of day. residents own a reliable motor vehicle .
26 Quality of project services (up to 30 points) • The Secretary considers the quality of the services to be provided by the proposed project. In determining the quality of the project services, the Secretary considers: 1. The quality and sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and treatment for eligible project participants who are members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability (34 CFR 75.210) (up to 10 points); and 2. The likelihood that the services to be provided by the proposed project will lead to improvement in the achievement of students as measured against rigorous academic standards (34 CFR 75.210) (up to 20 points).
27 Quality of project design (up to 20 points) • In determining the quality of project design for the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors: 1. The extent to which the applicant describes a plan to create a complete pipeline of services, without time and resource gaps, that is designed to prepare all children in the neighborhood to attain a high-quality education and successfully transition to college and a career (up to 5 points); 2. The extent to which the project will significantly increase the proportion of students in the neighborhood that are served by the complete continuum of high-quality services (up to 5 points); and 3. The extent to which the proposed family navigation system is high-quality and provides students and their families sufficient services and supports based on available services and individual needs (up to 10 points).
28 Quality of the management plan (up to 15 points) • The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for the proposed project. In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors: 1. The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing project tasks (34 CFR 75.210) (up to 5 points); and 2. The experience, lessons learned, and proposal to build capacity of the applicant’s management team and project director in collecting, analyzing, and using data for decision-making, learning, continuous improvement, and accountability, including whether the applicant has a plan to build, adapt, or expand a longitudinal data system that integrates student-level data from multiple sources in order to measure progress while abiding by privacy laws and requirements (2011 Promise Neighborhoods NFP) (up to 10 points).
29 Adequacy of resources (up to 15 points) • The Secretary considers the adequacy of resources for the proposed project. In determining the adequacy of resources for the proposed project, the Secretary considers: 1. The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the number of persons to be served and to the anticipated results and benefits (34 CFR 75.210) (up to 5 points); 2. The extent to which the applicant demonstrates that it has the resources to operate the project beyond the length of the grant, including a multi-year financial and operating model and accompanying plan; the demonstrated commitment of any partners; evidence of broad support from stakeholders (e.g., State educational agencies, teachers’ unions) critical to the project’s long-term success; or more than one of these types of evidence (34 CFR 75.210) (up to 5 points); and 3. The extent to which the applicant identifies existing neighborhood assets and programs supported by Federal, State, local, and private funds that will be used to implement a continuum of solutions (2011 Promise Neighborhoods NFP) (up to 5 points).
2021 Promise Neighborhoods Application Overview Process
31 Application Process Overview Application process using grants.gov • Register early • Find the application • Application instructions • 24-hour support from grants.gov: 1-800-518-4726 or support@grants.gov • ED Abstract Form • Submitting on grants.gov • Double-check the checklist to ensure completion of required forms • Submit the application on grantes.gov by March 5, 2021
32 Completing and Submitting an Application • PN Abstract Narrative • Project Narrative (recommended page limit: 50 pages) • Budget Narrative • Appendices • Required Other Forms: ▫ Standard Forms ▫ Assurances and Certifications
33 Electronic Application Submission Checklist • Part 1: Preliminary Documents ▫ Application for Federal Assistance (Form SF 424) – Note: must complete this form first ▫ ED Supplemental Information for SF 424 • Part 2: Budget Information ▫ ED Budget Information Non-Construction Programs (ED Form 524) • Part 3: ED Abstract Form ▫ Project Abstract • Part 4: Project Narrative Attachment Form ▫ Application Narrative
34 Electronic Application Submission Checklist • Part 5: Budget Narrative Attachment Form ▫ Budget Narrative • Part 6: Other Attachments Form ▫ Individual Resumes for Project Directors & Key Personnel ▫ Copy of Indirect Cost Rate Agreement ▫ Letters of Support ▫ References/Bibliography • Part 7: Assurances and Certifications ▫ Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Standard Form LLL) ▫ Grants.Gov Lobbying Form – “Certification Regarding Lobbying” (ED 80-013 Form) ▫ General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) Requirements – Section 427 (ED GEPA427 form) ▫ MOU/MOA and, if applicable, Consortium Agreement Documentation; all group applicants ▫ POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL FORMS
35 Grants.gov Registering as an Organization • Before applying for a funding opportunity, you need to register as an applicant associated with an organization. ▫ Registering with Grants.gov allows you to create an account and connect it with the organization you either work for or otherwise contribute to their grant applications.
36 Grants.gov Registering as an Organization • An organization is an entity that submits grant applications on behalf of the group, such as a state government, nonprofit organization, or a private business. • Registering as an organization applicant submits a request to your organization's EBiz POC for Grants.gov roles. ▫ One of these roles is the Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) role, which, if authorized to you, allows you to submit applications on behalf of your organization.
37 Grants.gov Registering as an Organization
38
39 Type “promise neighborhoods” into the search engine. Click “GO”.
40 Click the Promise Neighborhoods Opportunity Number “ED-GRANTS-011921- 001”
41 Click “Apply”.
42 Grants.gov Registering as an Organization • Please make sure to begin registration early, as the process takes between three business days and three weeks. • If you do not complete your registration by the submission deadline, then you are unlikely to be allowed to submit an application.
43 Grants.gov Support Desk Email or call 24/7 (except federal holidays) Include your supporting details. Support@Grants.gov Local Toll Free: 1-800-518-4726 International: 1-606-545-5035 Program Office staff cannot provide technical assistance.
44 Submission of Application Successful Submission Unsuccessful Submission • Applicants should receive a time and • Applicants should receive a date stamped confirmation and an confirmation email with a time and date assigned tracking number from stamp and an assigned tracking Grants.gov. number from Grants.gov. • Applicants should receive a validation • If the application is received after March email from Grants.gov within two 5, 20121 or validation is not successful, business days. This means the applicant should receive an error email. application is ready for Department • Email may list the error, or applicant pickup. can use their tracking number to find • Applicants should receive an email with the submission error. their ED assigned PR Award #. • Check spam and junk folder for this email since it will not come from ED.
2021 Promise Neighborhoods Peer Review Process
46 Peer Review Process The Call for Peer Reviewers seeks individuals with expertise in early learning, education and school reform, family and community engagement, need and organizational analysis, evaluation, and equity. Reviewers will read, prepare a written evaluation, and score the applications assigned to their panel, using the selection criteria. Moderators will facilitate reviewer panel discussions. The Department will prepare a rank order of applications for each absolute priority based on the evaluation of their quality by the peer reviewers according to the selection criteria.
47 Recommended Page Limit and Style • The application narrative is where the applicant addresses the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. ▫ We recommend that you: 1. Limit the application narrative to no more than 50 pages The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes, the bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the recommended page limit does apply to all of the application narrative. 2. Use the following standards: A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5’’ x 11’’, on one side only, with 1’’ margins at the top, bottom, and both sides. Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in charts. Tables, figures, and graphs. Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch). Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, Courier New, or Arial.
48 Reminders • In reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as the applicant’s use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and compliance with grant conditions. • The Secretary may also consider whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
49 Reminders • The Secretary requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23)
51 Promise Neighborhoods Partners
• Promise Neighborhoods Websites: ▫ https://promiseneighborhoods.ed.gov ▫ https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of- Resources discretionary-grants-support- services/school-choice-improvement- programs/promise-neighborhoods-pn/ • NFP & NIA ▫ https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00907.pdf • Application Package ▫ https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/search- grants.html?keywords=Promise%20Neighbor hoods • Developmental Pathway for Achieving Results ▫ https://www.policylink.org/resources/pni -developmental-pathway • Measuring Performance: A Guidance Document for Promise Neighborhoods on Collecting Data and Reporting Results ▫ https://www2.ed.gov/programs/promisen eighborhoods/pndataguidance.pdf
You can also read