University Presidents' Council - CONFERENCE 2021 CORNELL MODEL UNITED NATIONS - Cornell Model UN Conference

Page created by Carolyn Santos
 
CONTINUE READING
University Presidents’
      Council
CORNELL MODEL UNITED NATIONS
      CONFERENCE 2021
Copyright © 2021 by the Cornell Model United Nations Conference

  All rights reserved. This document or any portion thereof may not be reproduced
   or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the
Cornell Model United Nations Conference (CMUNC) except when used for educational
                                     purposes.

    Commercial reproduction or reference to this document requires the express
  written consent of the current Secretary-General of CMUNC. Further terms of use
         for commercial purposes will be determined on a case-by-case basis.

  For more information on CMUNC, use the Contact Us page located at: cmunc.net

                                        2
CMUNC 2021 Secretariat
        Secretary-General
         Malvika Narayan

         Director-General
         Bryan Weintraub

          Chief of Staff
      James “Hamz” Piccirilli

        Director of Events
        Alexandra Tsalikis

       Director of Outreach
        Akosa Nwadiogbu

    Director of Communications
           Annie Rogers

        Director of Finance
         Daniel Bernstein

      Director of Operations
       Andrew Landesman

     Under-Secretary Generals
        Robyn Bardmesser
          Avery Bower
           John Clancy
        Mariana Goldlust

                 3
From Your Chair
Dear Delegates,

Welcome to CMUNC 2021! I will be your chair for the University Presidents’
Council! I cannot wait to see what we will be able to accomplish this weekend as
we talk about topics such as covid-19 management and equitability in college
admissions.

I am Gayatri Somaiya. I am a junior studying Biology & Government in the
College of Arts & Sciences. I am from Mumbai, India. I am so excited to spend
the weekend with you all. Outside of CIAS, I am the Vice President of the
Cornell Speech & Debate Society and the COO of the Advocacy Project. I have
been doing Model UN since middle school, so I have seen a fair amount of
different types of conferences. However, I have never chaired a virtual
conference, so this is going to be a novel and challenging experience for both of
us. That being said, I am certain that we are going to make this a fantastic
committee.

The University Presidents’ Council is going to be an imaginative experience for
you, delegates, as you have not experienced the problems that college students
and administrators face. However, put yourself in the shoes of the people you
are going to be in a few years and imagine how you would want these problems
to be solved. Some of the decisions that you make as presidents of these
universities might be decisions that presidents might make in the future as they
grapple with these exact problems.

I look forward to meeting all of you on conference day. If you have any
questions or concerns about the background guide or the committee, or if you
would like to just talk about Cornell in general, feel free to message me at
gss79@cornell.edu. Hope to hear from you soon and enjoy your semester!

Gayatri Somaiya

University Presidents’ Council Chair

CMUNC 2021

                                        4
Introduction to the Committee

      The University Presidents’ Council is a council of presidents from 75

different college campuses across the country. The council meets to discuss and

resolve challenges that the representatives are facing on their respective college

campuses. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, college campuses have had to deal

with challenges that they have never experienced before. Even though some of

these issues surfaced before the start of the pandemic, the age of COVID-19

brought a lot of these issues to light. Inequalities between students had never

been clearer, whether individuals are struggling with housing conditions or

mental health issues. Prospective students have found themselves wondering if

they could afford to attend their planned institution, or if opting to an in-state

college was the more reasonable alternative.

      Presidents of colleges and universities have important decisions to make

during this Council session. Some pressing issues include the standards of

admissions inequalities on college campuses, virtual education transitions, and

grading frameworks.

      This committee will function as a typical Specialized Agency set in the

present. This means that Covid-19 will play a role in whichever decisions that

you will make. You also have to take into account potential budget cuts and

rising costs due to the current economic crisis going on in the country.

                                          5
Additionally, you have to consider the differences and similarities between the

multiple college campuses and try to come up with uniform rules that work

across the college campuses while also contending with the differences between

them.

                                        6
Topic A: Covid-19 and College Campuses

                           Introduction to the Topic

      One of the most pertinent issues that college campuses face today is the

COVID-19 pandemic. Studies have suggested that college campuses are COVID-

19 ‘super-spreaders’, especially during the first two weeks of the academic year.

During the fall semester, many colleges had to deal with rising coronavirus cases

due to large, unregulated social gatherings among students. However, with

constant testing, successful contact tracing, and peer accountability, some

colleges did have successful returns to campus.

      College campuses have faced many other challenges resulting from the

pandemic. Due to online classes, college campuses have seen an upsurge in

academic cheating. Students across the country have also been demanding more

flexible grading schemes and better mental health resources. As presidents, the

Council must make decisions on how to make the college experience as

equitable as possible, as well as how hard to crack down on Covid-19 violations.

                              History of the Topic

      When the pandemic hit the United States in March of 2020, college

campuses experienced tremendous turmoil. Many colleges and universities shut

down all campus activities and sent all of the students home. Some campuses

sent their students home in the middle of spring break, without even giving the

                                         7
students a chance to collect their belongings, while other colleges gave students

a grace period to pack up their things and leave. Due to this disruption of the

students’ education, many universities decided to have flexible grading schemes.

Some universities opted to make all classes uniformly Pass/Fail, while others

allowed students to take as many classes as they would like Pass/Fail, while also

being allowed to keep some classes graded. This was to prevent students from

feeling stressed out about their grades when they had many other causes of

worry. There were arguments made for both strategies.

      Neither students nor college administrators had any idea about when

students would once again be allowed on campus. When the fall semester

started coming up, different universities took different strategies. While some

universities took a risk and invited all their students back, other colleges went

completely online, and some universities adopted a hybrid model in which they

invited some students back but not all. However, the moment students started

coming back to campus, many colleges saw a rise in coronavirus cases due to

students being irresponsible and hosting large gatherings. Consequently, many

universities shut down campuses again after bringing everyone back due to the

infection rates. Nonetheless, colleges such as Cornell University took a different

approach and decided to aggressively test and contact-trace as

necessary. Although some still had clusters throughout the semester, these

                                         8
universities managed to keep the incidence rate of COVID-19 low. Other

colleges and universities also had similar success stories that raise questions

about what policies might work to curb COVID-19 rates on campus.

      As online classes became more prominent, other issues also came to light.

In the fall semester, students demanded that the same policies that were decided

in the spring get carried over, such as the flexible grading scheme. They argued

that they were in the same situation that they were in during the spring of 2020

and that it was unfair to put the stress of grades back onto these students on top

of all the other potential stressors. As Presidents of the respective colleges, you

have to decide whether these arguments are worth considering and whether

students deserve to have a Pass/Fail system as many had in the spring of 2020.

For the purpose of this committee, please seek to create a system that is uniform

across colleges. This will prevent some students from getting an unfair

advantage in graduate school because they can improve their GPA, while other

students have to take all their classes Pass/Fail.

      Another issue that became prominent during the pandemic was the lack

of academic integrity. Before the pandemic, most exams were in-person, where

it was easier to tell if students were cheating. However, as classes went online,

students could get away with a lot more. As Presidents, you must decide on what

is the best way to solve the problem. Does it mean being harsher on the students

                                          9
who cheat, or having stricter policies during exams? Does it mean reducing the

ability of students to cheat in other ways, or shifting the way assessments of

students are taken? These are all questions that can be discussed during the

conference.

                      Questions a Resolution Must Answer

   1. What are some policies that must be implemented to deal with the rising

      COVID-19 cases on campuses?

         1. What are some administrative policies that should occur?

         2. How should college administrators discipline students who break

              COVID-19 policies?

   2. Should there be a uniform Pass/Fail policy during the spring 2021

      semester?

         1. If not, what are the alternatives that could be suggested to make

              grading more equitable?

   3. How can faculty deal with the issue of academic integrity as classes remain

      in a virtual setting?

         1. How can professors make the exams more flexible, or should they

              have stricter proctoring?

                                          10
Topic B: Standardized Testing and Admissions

                            Introduction to the Topic

      During the COVID-19 pandemic, many colleges decided to make

standardized testing optional because they realized it was inequitable. While

some students were able to get to testing centers because they lived in privileged

areas, many students had trouble taking the SAT or the ACT because the testing

centers were either closed due to the pandemic, or the students could not afford

to pay the entrance fees because they were trying to make ends meet. Some

studies have found that waiving the standardized testing applications has

improved admissions rates to elite universities. However, these inequalities in

standardized testing have long existed. Some students receive an advantage over

other students because they are able to take extra classes to prepare for

standardized tests. Additionally, standardized testing does not take into account

any factors except how the student does on the day of the test. On the flip side,

there are benefits to standardized testing. Standardized testing does give a

uniform medium of comparison when students come from many different

backgrounds and types of schooling. These tests also prepare students for high-

pressure testing that they are probably going to face in college. As Presidents of

your respective colleges, you must take this time to decide whether standardized

                                        11
testing is necessary for admissions and whether or not there are feasible

alternatives.

                               History of the Topic

      Standardized testing was used as an alternative to oral exams in the US

during the 1840s. Horace Mann, who is considered to be the father of

standardized testing came back from Europe in 1945, convinced that written tests

were superior to oral examinations. Therefore, Horace Mann had members of

the Board of Education develop written examinations to give to students in the

Boston school system. After this change occurred, standardized testing began to

be adopted everywhere across the country. Currently, the SAT and the ACT are

the most common standardized tests that are available to judge students’

aptitude for college.

      As mentioned in the introduction, there are both negative and positive

aspects of standardized testing. Supporters of standardized testing maintain that

standardized testing offers an objective measure of education. This is because

teacher’s grading practices are naturally subjective across schools and having an

objective measure that colleges can look at is extremely helpful. However, strong

performance on standardized tests often is correlated with socio-economic

privilege. Students score higher when they have access to elite preparation

classes and other resources. Therefore, critics of standardized tests argue that

                                        12
standardized testing is an inaccurate metric of a student’s progress because some

students have an unfair advantage over others.

                      Alternatives to Standardized Testing

      There are several alternatives to standardized testing that you can discuss

during the committee. These alternatives are not mutually exclusive. As

Presidents, you can decide which of these potential alternatives could be used in

place of or in conjunction with standardized testing to make the admissions

process more equitable. Stealth assessments: A passive method of collecting

educational data through online softwares such as Khan academy. These

softwares can collect information throughout a semester or school year. This

type of assessment gives a more holistic view of how students do, rather than

measuring how they do at one point in time. However, this might raise privacy

concerns. The software is also extremely new, so it might be harder to establish

across most schools across the country. Social and emotional skills: Students

could be surveyed on other measures, such as the Gallup student poll (which

measures levels of hope, engagement and well-being). Advocates argue that

these types of polls are better predictors of college success than SAT/ACT

scores. However, these polls might not give a good indicator of academic

performance when applying to universities. Video-game assessments: These

types of assessments try to indicate higher-order thinking. These tests are still in

                                         13
their infancy, but could become viable options in the future. Performance or

portfolio-based assessments: These type of assessments are what you

would normally think of as holistic measures of admission. These include

projects, individual and group presentations, reports, and papers that are

collected throughout high school. Other things to put more weight on during

admissions could be public service, show-casing their leadership in

extracurricular activities. You also have to think about how to value the

educational achievements of students from resource-poor schools, even if these

achievements may not be up to the standards of other students from privileged

backgrounds.

                      Questions a Resolution Must Answer

   1. What should be valued most in admissions: objective measures or

      personalized applications?

   2. Based on the previous question, which admission strategy would be the

      best for that goal?

   3. What are the potential pros and cons of that strategy, and how would you

      be able to deal with that? Should these admissions strategies vary across

      institutions?

   4. What will be each President’s role in making sure that these policies are

      implemented in college campuses?

                                        14
5. What policies should be put in place to address the difficulties of college

   admissions during the age of COVID-19?

                                     15
List of Positions

Christina Hull Paxon (Brown University)

Joseph E. Aoun (Northeastern University)

Philip J. Hanlon (Dartmouth College)

Peter Salovey (Yale University)

David W. Leebron (Rice University)

John J. DeGioia (Georgetown University)

Michael K. Young (Texas A&M University)

Morton Schapiro (Northwestern University)

Michael J. Smith (Berkeley College)

Julio Frenk (University of Miami)

Helen Drinan (Simmons University)

Robert A. Brown (Boston University)

Robert Zimmer (University of Chicago)

Amy Guttman (University of Pennsylvania)

Ronald J. Daniels (John Hopkins University)

Michael M. Crow (Arizona State University)

Maud S. Mandel (Williams College)

Lawrence Bacow (Harvard University)

Marc Tessier-Lavigne (Stanford University)

                                         16
Bruce Harrield (University of Iowa)

Freeman A. Hrabowski, III (University of Maryland, Baltimore County)

Edward Guiliano (New York Institute of Technology)

Ronald D. Liebowitz (Brandeis University)

Lee C. Bollinger (Columbia University)

Vincent Price (Duke University)

Sylvia Mathews Burwell (American University)

Martha Pollack (Cornell University)

Dr. Michael Drake (University of California)

G. Gabrielle Starr (Pomona University)

Hirom Chodosh (Claremont-McKenna College)

Christopher L. Eisegruber (Princeton University)

Mark Schlissel (University of Michigan)

Jay Hartzell (UT Austin)

L. Rafael Reif (MIT)

Daniel Deirmeier (Vanderbilt University)

John I. Jenkins (University of Notre Dame)

Gregory L. Fenves (Emory University)

Peter Hans (University of North Carolina system)

Andrew D. Hamilton (NYU)

Jim Malatras (SUNY system)

                                         17
Anthony Monaco (Tufts University)

Sarah Mangelsdorf (University of Rochester)

Katherine Rowe (William & Mary)

James E. Ryan (University of Virginia)

Suresh Garimella (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Michael Fitts (Tulane University)

Shirley Ann Jackson (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)

Angel Cabrera (Georgia Institute of Technology)

John Douglas Simon (Lehigh University)

Timothy L. Killeen (University of Illinois System)

                                         18
Works Cited
Walke HT, Honein MA, Redfield RR. Preventing and Responding to COVID-19
on College Campuses. JAMA. 2020;324(17):1727–1728. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.20027

Gajewski, M. (2021, January 13). College campuses are covid-19 superspreaders,
study says. Retrieved February 24, 2021, from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mishagajewski/2021/01/13/college-campuses-are-
covid-19-superspreaders-study-says/?sh=21374e1752fd

Kamenetz, A. (2015, January 06). What schools could use instead of standardized
tests. Retrieved February 24, 2021, from
https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2015/01/06/371659141/what-schools-could-use-
instead-of-standardized-tests

Ezekiel J. Dixon-Román, F. (2019, October 29). Standardized tests like SAT and
ACT favor students with FAMILY wealth: Opinion. Retrieved February 24, 2021,
from https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/commentary/sat-act-standardized-tests-
equity-socioeconomic-status-wealth-20191029.html

Llc, E. (2020, August 31). What if standardized tests aren't part of college
acceptance?: Earnest. Retrieved February 24, 2021, from
https://www.earnest.com/blog/standardized-testing/

Students seek pass-fail options again for fall in light of covid-19. (n.d.). Retrieved
February 24, 2021, from
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/11/30/students-seek-pass-fail-
options-again-fall-light-covid-19

                                          19
You can also read