Unchaining the Shackles Imposed by CRAs - Open Future World
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 2 Imposed by CRAs Contents An Introduction P3 The History of CRAs P5 Historical Data P7 Impacts on Businesses P10 An Alternative P13 Credit Risk, Redefined. P17 Mortgages P21 The Future P23 Contact DirectID P25
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 3 Imposed by CRAs An Introduction Having co-founded several FinTech startups, the process of applying for retail credit was well known to DirectID Chief Executive Officer, James Varga. An application is completed, you provide a myriad of ID, and then the lender reaches out to one of three Credit Reference Agencies (CRAs): Experian, TransUnion or Equifax. Even with a near perfect credit score of 990, James Varga found himself on the receiving end of a declined application in an Edinburgh tech store. It’s ironic that such an incident would occur to the CEO of a credit risk oriented FinTech but will be a common anecdote for many. James moved from Canada to the UK some twenty years ago, and with an immaculate credit score it is difficult to rationalise why there would be an issue in accessing retail credit for a laptop.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 4 Imposed by CRAs During Applications Customers Rarely Find out why an Application has been Declined. They are Usually Referred to the Credit Agency Directly, which can be a Lengthy Process. Credit bureaus hold all sorts of information on individuals, such as address history, credit history, time in country, but if any of these don’t stack in your favour, even when you can comfortably afford the credit allowance in question, problems with applications can occur. These features are attributed to a tried and tested point scoring system to satisfy a lenders minimal threshold for credit risk. Despite the financial services industry undergoing huge transformations driven by new technology in recent years, until recently, most lenders have followed the same methodology during the credit risk assessment period. James’ story is a perfect example of why the historical methods of relying on bureau data may no longer be the answer for lenders.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 6 Imposed by CRAs The Earliest Use of Credit Reference Dates to the 1800’s. Two brothers, Cator and Guy Wooolford, compiled a list of customers who were good payers and later sold these to suppliers in the US. By the 1970’s the business, now called Equifax, evolved to using electronic data and became recognised as the most established CRA in the world. As this became mainstream practice in consumer lending, legislators devised the Consumer Credit Act 1974. This was the first of many regulations to help protect consumers using credit services. The use of CRA data and the way in which they collect data was legislated within the act. They defined CRAs as a business “comprising the furnishing of persons with information relevant to the financial standard of individuals, being information collected by the agency for that purpose”. For the legislation written in the years to follow the aim was clear: to ensure all information kept on consumers was relevant, accurate, and made available when called upon by businesses for making decisions or to the subject of the data directly.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 8 Imposed by CRAs Data Consistency When a lender requests information from an agency, or calls multiple, they use this information to inform their assessment of risk in writing a loan. Where this becomes a problem is the lack of consistency between the separate organisations. Each agency records information as a separate entity that operates completely independently from the others. The reports that each bureau holds on an individual is likely to be variable, in other words, depending on which agency a lender decides to use to inform their decision making can ultimately determine whether a loan application is accepted or declined. This raises the question of whether this information can truly be considered accurate. Data That is no Longer Fit for Purpose Lenders – particularly SME’s, have been hit hard by the pandemic. The affects this has had throughout the lending chain has been felt sorely by consumers at the bottom of the chain. The lending sector is at a crossroad; the demand for short term credit has soared in the last 12 months but this has come at the at the expense of risk volatility, especially with the growing presence of vulnerability in the UK.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 9 Imposed by CRAs In the Past Underwriting Teams have Relied on Bureau Data to Evaluate an Individual’s Creditworthiness They often struggle to determine whether an individual is in a sound position to borrow because of the accuracy of the data. Often the data acquired by lenders from the CRAs can date back as far as a year. Speaking generally, the financial circumstances for most of the UK population are likely to have changed in that period of time. With the increasing number of people who find themselves in financial hardship, a huge risk is presented to the debt book of lending organisations. The changing nature of the employment market also raises questions about the use of CRA data. Employment opportunities have changed significantly over the last decade with fewer people relying on a traditional salary than ever before. Over 1 in 10 working adults in the UK work through gig economy platforms such as Uber, Deliveroo or Upwork. Despite such a large chunk of the population living without a traditional salary, CRA data doesn’t recognise these income sources as significant indicators of creditworthiness. This makes it difficult for gig economy workers to access traditional credit products. That goes for migrants too. People with new to country status tend to have a very limited access to these services. Bureaus rely on past data to build our credit profile based on things like our employment and address history, so getting onto the credit ladder can be a real challenge for migrants. The data provided by credit bureaus is incomplete and less appropriate for the world we live in. The adverse effect this has on both consumers and businesses is largely negative.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 10 Imposed by CRAs Impact on Businesses & Their Customers
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 11 Imposed by CRAs Business Impact For lenders, particularly SMEs, there’s a growing list of pains associated with using CRA data as a core component of credit risk decisions. The risk involved with using bureau data has skyrocketed since the beginning of the pandemic. To make adequate underwriting decisions in the onboarding process for example, an underwriter needs to be able to understand what an applicant can afford to repay based on their current income and expenditure. While this has always been the case, any credit risk decision is built upon what someone earns versus what they spend, but bureau data doesn’t capture the real-time nature of this. This also explains why underwriting teams are finding it difficult to identify vulnerable customers. The retrospective nature of the data they have access to makes it near impossible to understand an individual’s current financial circumstances. Although CRA data has long been the industry standard for credit decisioning, it is evident that the practice lacks the real-time element of affordability and creditworthiness assessment, both of which are key requirements for moving towards a functional post- covid world. Financial firms have started to seek alternative methods of credit risk assessment, and there’s one in particular that suits the nature of the new climate we find ourselves in.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 12 Imposed by CRAs Customer Impact If you’re familiar with the traditional lending model, you’re sure to have heard the phrase ‘to get credit you have to have credit’ - a model that is inherently broken. Research from PwC shows that between 10-14m people, roughly a quarter of the population, struggle to access mainstream credit sources, despite having only minor blemishes on their credit history. Other sources of credit, such as Near-prime credit cards, fail to serve customers with thin credit files. The Near-prime credit card sector which is served by just four providers, account for only 8% of all credit cards held in the UK, despite an estimate that 20-27% of UK adults that would fall into the group eligible for such facilities. But it all comes back to the same problem – lenders cannot be confident in an applicant’s ability to repay a loan with the data they currently have.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 13 Imposed by CRAs An Alternative
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 14 Imposed by CRAs As financial services have done at many key moments throughout history, the time has come for a change in thinking The traditional model has shown cracks for years, and the presence of the pandemic has forced businesses to consider new ways of working. Operating in the same way, just because that is the way things have always been done, is no longer an option. While lenders can use CRAs to determine what loans, credit cards, and other financial products an applicant has had, determining what the impact of a new financial product will have on an applicant remains challenging. Traditional methods of assessing affordability are largely inefficient, time consuming, and limited to historical information. And nearly all credit decisions, including on affordability and in collections and recoveries, are based on understanding a customer or applicant’s income. Without having a true reflection of income, it is nearly impossible to make a decision with 100% confidence. Open Banking makes answering that key question that all lenders want to know ‘what is your financial situation’ much easier.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 15 Imposed by CRAs Bank Data Using bank data means that it is possible to understand the granularity that can be contained within some bank statements. With individuals receiving income from a diverse range of sources, including salary, income from part-time or gig economy work, pension or benefits, some individuals can receive money from more than one source on a monthly basis, and it can vary from month to month. The insights gleaned from bank data provide a lender with a detailed view of what outgoings the applicant has compared to that salary or income, making affordability and other credit risk calculation much simpler and faster. This can all be done in seconds when an applicant connects their bank account, giving a real-time view, and negating the need for any paper documents.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page16 Imposed by CRAs Sectors Where Bank Data Will Prevail in 2021 The use of Open Banking data in credit risk decisions has seen a huge uptake since the launch of the programme in 2018. Last month, OBIE reported a total of 670m API calls, double that of the year before. With that early success use cases are beginning to pay dividends to the effort that has been placed into Open Banking from the FinTechs, banks, and regulators. This marks the start of a move to an Open Finance model, in which data from a magnitude of different sources can be utilised. With the extra insights, and requirement for better technologies, there are several uses cases growing in strength.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 17 Imposed by CRAs Credit Risk, Redefined.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 18 Imposed by CRAs Customer Onboarding Perhaps one of the earlier successes in Open Banking data, the use of bank data in customer onboarding has been well documented. Whether it be simply digitising bank statements to shorten the assessment time, or using the insights provided by third party providers to better understand an individual’s financial profile, the switch to Open Banking data is more efficient and accurate. Where bureau data will provide a more retrospective score to inform underwriting teams, insights gleaned from bank data on affordability, income verification, and cashflow, give underwriters the full picture. In a post-covid world where a recent loss of earning is more common in credit applicants these insights are invaluable.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 19 Imposed by CRAs Portfolio Management The demand for Open Banking in portfolio management has surged. Not only can bank data provide a detailed view on one customer, but it also opens the possibility to monitor behaviours on a lender’s entire customer base. These insights give lenders the power to identify behaviours and segments within their portfolio and enhance their ability to manage risk across the debt book. Identifying clusters of emerging financial distress within a portfolio is currently of high importance to lenders. Ultimately, Open Banking gives a lender the ability to identify these customers early and reduce the flow of customers to the collections end of the business.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 20 Imposed by CRAs Collections & Recoveries In the unfortunate circumstance that a customer is passed to the collections team, a stressful and time-consuming process for the customer is instigated. When a customer becomes delinquent lenders still have to address the same affordability requirements found in a credit risk decision. The first step in the process can take hours of dissecting bank statements and, even when combined with CRA data, it doesn’t tend to show the full picture. By leveraging Open Banking, the customer merely has to login to their internet banking, and Open Banking will provide the collections agent with read-only access to the customer’s bank statement information. With no data asserted by the customer, agents are granted a complete and factual view of the customer’s financial situation – with no reliance on customers to provide information which can be exaggerated or potentially untruthful. This streamlines the whole collections process, creating a journey that is efficient, accurate, and far more suitable for the vulnerable customers that are likely to fall into financial hardship.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 21 Imposed by CRAs Mortgages
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 22 Imposed by CRAs Mortgages Just as in any credit risk decision, mortgage lenders must fulfil their internal and external policy around affordability and creditworthiness during the mortgage application process. A huge amount of resource is dedicated to understanding the credit profiles of mortgage applicants. Traditionally this has been done by calling out CRAs to build an understanding on past borrowing habits and other credit score impactors, supplemented by 3 months of bank statements for an underwriter to depict line by line. With Open Banking insights mortgage underwriters can gain a much better view of the financial indicators found in a strong, or insufficient, mortgage application. The process of data collation and analysis is rapidly sped up. It’s not just in the credit risk decision that Open Banking is adding value to mortgage applications. Mortgage providers can implement Open Banking in the Decision in Principle stage before it gets to an underwriter. Customers then have a realistic view on what a lender can offer before CRAs or any physical financial data is involved.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 23 Imposed by CRAs The Future
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page 24 Imposed by CRAs As we move to a global, and an inherently digital, economy, we must recognise the need for change. At the core of this change is the need for financial institutions to achieve maximum efficiency. The firms that bootstrap from the Covid era will rely on technologies developed by FinTechs to save time, resource, and cash. Leveraging data and insights will empower them to make effective decisions and help propel their organisations forward. Open Banking has seen its best year yet in terms of adoption, influence, and capability. And yet, it merely marks the tip of the iceberg. As momentum increases from regulators around Open Finance, the potential to go even further in the key use cases has never been greater. With access to an even wider range of accounts such as credit card spend, long term investments and alternative bank accounts, the potential for even more valuable Open Banking services becomes huge. Open banking FinTechs and tech companies are supplanting CRAs because of their willingness to embrace new and more effective tech to make better decisions. Even at the current stage, access to Open Banking data sets is proving far more valuable than the methodologies that laid the groundwork for credit risk decisions some 200 years ago. Both businesses and consumers are starting to live and breathe the rewards of replacing old practices with Open Banking. And with that, the regulators are guiding financial services to an Open Finance model, which upon success, will likely lead to an open data ecosystem, destined to benefit us all.
Unchaining the Shackles DirectID | Page25 Imposed by CRAs Contact Website directid.theidco.com docs.direct.id support.directid.co Phone United Kingdom +448451193333 North America 1 855 343 5670 Address United Kingdom 83 Princes Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2ER North America 1890 Market Street, Suite 200, San Fran, CA94102
You can also read