Typhoon Haiyan, Philippines, 2013 - Parallel Session 4: Recent Disasters - Lessons Learnt G. Padmanabhan Emergency Analyst & Officer in Charge DM ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Typhoon Haiyan, Philippines, 2013 Parallel Session 4: Recent Disasters - Lessons Learnt G. Padmanabhan Emergency Analyst & Officer in Charge DM Unit, UNDP India
Contents Philippines- Disaster Profile (2) Typhoon Haiyan, 2013 (4) Challenges (1) Key Lessons learnt (4)
The Philippines – Disaster Risk Profile • One of the world’s largest archipelago nations, extremely prone to hydro- meteorological & seismic disasters. • It is the third most disaster prone country in the world as per World Risk Report 2012 (UNU). • On an average, every year disasters affect 3 million people and kill 1000 people. • Economic damage is estimated to be around USD 200 million per year. • Around 20 typhoons strike/yr. • In 2011 & 2012 – two major typhoons, Sendong & Pablo (Bopha) affected 6.5 million people.
Institutional structure for DM • National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC) established sectoral cluster system for preparing and responding to disasters. • As per the Act 2010, the national disaster risk reduction and management framework has been prepared. • Government has dedicated resources to strengthen response capacity and disaster management mechanisms.
Typhoon Haiyan 2013 One of the most powerful storm (approximately 230 kmph) ever recorded in the country, hit the Philippines on November 8, 2013 Path of Typhoon Haiyan Overall Impact Lives of 14 million people affected in 14 1.1 million houses provinces & were damaged or 141 municipalities destroyed Source: UNOCHA, COD, JMA, JTWC Livelihoods of 5.6 million workers were affected 4
Typhoon Haiyan 2013 Five provinces were fatally struck by several successive landfalls communi transport power medical cations ation Power supply Telecommunication Continuous Five provinces that were directly hit was cut off in lines were affected rain, severe road had no access to first aid, seven regions conditions, lack of medical facilities & relief nationwide transportation operations infrastructure With the breakdown of power and communications system, no one knew the extent of destruction. 5
Haiyan : Actions taken by the government • At the time of Haiyan, the government and international community were responding to number of emergencies, including the Bohol province earthquake in central Philippines in October 2013. • Declared State of calamity across the affected areas • Established the Office of the Presidential Assistant for Rehabilitation and Recovery (OPARR) to address recovery needs • Civil-military cooperation made a significant contribution to the speed and effectiveness of early stages of the response. • Established strong partnership with international relief agencies and private sector • Out of a total of nine regions hit by the typhoon, four regions were selected for inter-agency response. 6
Haiyan: Actions taken by other stakeholders • Activation of Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC). • Coordinated response activities with the Government of the Philippines. • Formulated ‘The Strategic Response Plan’ – to support the Government in responding to the immediate humanitarian needs of the people affected and to supplement the Government’s Yolanda (Haiyan) Rehabilitation and Recovery Plan. • The total budget for the SRP was US$ 788 million. • By 31 August 2014, $468 million was received against the plan. 6
Haiyan: Challenges • Difficulties in identifying large numbers of victims. • Distribution of relief materials- due to poor road and other transportation infrastructure, workers were unable to access even nearby supplies. • Different planning timeframes and a lack of clarity around linkages between emergency relief and early recovery contributed to difficulties in the coordination and management of transition. • Coordination difficulties among local and international agencies due to differences in understanding transition from relief to recovery. • Lack of preparedness for the first responders- failure to educate residents of the magnitude of the anticipated storm surge. 7
Haiyan: Lessons learnt • Planning − Though Government data helped the early phases of international response, later both parties followed separate paths of assessment and planning. • Coordination − Coordination mechanisms were well funded and rapidly established. Cross-cutting issues and approaches provided opportunities for inter-cluster approaches. − Coordination process and tools helped in guiding agencies to avoid duplication, but it failed to include a range of agencies working outside this system. − Momentum of the international system created extra pressures for some national organizations. Roles and responsibilities in co-leadership were not clearly defined. There was limited adjustment to the global cluster system to fit with the national system. 8
Haiyan: Lessons learnt Preparedness • Lack of well-crafted disaster preparedness and contingency plans Local DRR governance • Communities were allowed to establish settlements on high risk areas or no- build zones. These were difficult lessons learned in the aftermath of 2011 Typhoon Washi (Sendong). It appeared that to some extent, some of the local governments allowed a similar pattern of “concentrated risk” on supposedly no-build zones. • Use of hazard maps for decision making is required to create resilience communities Community Engagement • Local community leaders and those in rural areas were unaware of hazards, risks and vulnerabilities. Information dissemination, its clarification, and call to swift action especially at the local levels, could be done better 9
Haiyan: Lessons learnt • Early Warning • The guidance, education, and stronger participation of local communities (given their distinctive local knowledge) in designing the early warning systems still need to be addressed. • Timely warning were given and the use of broadcast media and bullhorns were commendable. But the implications of the warning messages were not fully understood by the community. • Communities stocked food and remained indoors; but people had no idea what a storm surge meant and they had no preparation against it. • Need well structured Standard Operation Procedures (SOPs) focusing on warning dissemination especially at the community level. 10
Haiyan: Lessons learnt Government Leadership • Strong leadership, practical measures such as co-location, former institutional working relationships and a focus on implementation helped in successful cooperation in implementation. Use of ICT • Over 2000 humanitarian workers used information services, which were coordinated by the Emergency Telecommunications Cluster, and provided/received information (government, United Nations (UN), non- governmental organizations (NGO) and private sector). • Disaster information was disseminated to communities through public radio stations in local dialects Role of the private sector • Quality rehabilitation, livelihood assistance and recovery services through social programs and services were provided to victims Regional cooperation (Information sharing) • Sharing of satellite images and data from international weather stations (e.g. Joint Typhoon Warning Center; Japan Meteorological Agency, etc.) indicated the presence of regional or international cooperation 11
You can also read