THORIUM AS AN ENERGY SOURCE - OPPORTUNITIES FOR NORWAY - REPORT BY THE THORIUM COMMITTEE DIETER RØHRICH UIB AND CERN (FROM 1.3.08)

Page created by Alfred Wallace
 
CONTINUE READING
THORIUM AS AN ENERGY SOURCE - OPPORTUNITIES FOR NORWAY - REPORT BY THE THORIUM COMMITTEE DIETER RØHRICH UIB AND CERN (FROM 1.3.08)
Thorium as an energy source –
                 opportunities for Norway

                        Report by the Thorium
                              committee

                            Dieter Røhrich
                      UiB and CERN (from 1.3.08)

                                                1
THORIUM AS AN ENERGY SOURCE - OPPORTUNITIES FOR NORWAY - REPORT BY THE THORIUM COMMITTEE DIETER RØHRICH UIB AND CERN (FROM 1.3.08)
Thorium as an energy source –
                 opportunities for Norway
The mandate:                      Concluding remarks:
  “The Committee’s work and       • The current knowledge of
  the resulting Report shall        thorium based energy
  establish a solid knowledge       generation and the geology is
  base concerning both              not solid enough to provide a
  opportunities and risks           final assesment regarding the
  related to the use of thorium     potential value for Norway of a
  for long-term energy              thorium based system for a long
  production. The work should       term energy production.
  be conducted as a study of      • The Committee recommends
  the opportunities and             that the thorium option be kept
  possibilities (screening),        open in so far it represents an
  based on a review of              interesting complement to the
  Norway’s thorium resources        uranium option to strengthen
  and the status of key             the sustainability of nuclear
  technologies.[...]”               energy

                                                                  2
THORIUM AS AN ENERGY SOURCE - OPPORTUNITIES FOR NORWAY - REPORT BY THE THORIUM COMMITTEE DIETER RØHRICH UIB AND CERN (FROM 1.3.08)
Primary energy consumption
 • World energy flows at the end of the last century
   53%           37%    26%                  8%      5%      22% = 150%

   oil           coal   gas               hydro nuclear     other

                                       electricity
                                       generation
                                           12%

                                                 Residential and
Transportation 24%      Industry 38%             commercial 38%     = 100%
                                                                       3
THORIUM AS AN ENERGY SOURCE - OPPORTUNITIES FOR NORWAY - REPORT BY THE THORIUM COMMITTEE DIETER RØHRICH UIB AND CERN (FROM 1.3.08)
Global energy consumption

                            4
THORIUM AS AN ENERGY SOURCE - OPPORTUNITIES FOR NORWAY - REPORT BY THE THORIUM COMMITTEE DIETER RØHRICH UIB AND CERN (FROM 1.3.08)
Energy situation in Europe

• Status 2004
   – 152 nuclear reactors -> 31% of electricity consumption
   – Nordic countries
       » Sweden: 10 units
       » Finland: 4 units, one nuclear power plant under construction

• The EU Climate and Energy Package - Targets by 2020
   – Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 20% compared to 1990
     level
   – Reduction of energy consumption by 20% compared to 1990 level
   – Increase the share of renewable sources in the EU energy mix to 20%
   – Increase the share of biofuels of transport petrol and diesel to 10%

                                                                        5
Cumulative natural uranium demand and reserves

                                                                                                                                              Nuclear Energy
                                                                                                                                              Agency’s Reference
                                        Cumulative Natural Uranium Demand and Reserve Levels                                                  Scenario

                                 6
                                                                                                                200                       •   Continued nuclear
                                                                                                                180
                                 5                                                                                                            growth
Million Tonnes Natural Uranium

                                                                                                                160
                                                                                                                                          •   Reported uranium

                                                                                                                      GtCO 2 Equivalent
                                 4                                                                              140
                                                                                                                120
                                                                                                                                              reserves last until
                                 3                                                                              100
                                                                                                                                              about 2040
                                                                                                                80                        •   Reported reserves
                                 2
                                                                                                                60                            depend on demand –
                                 1                                                                              40                            might increase
                                                                                                                20
                                                                                                                                          •   Breeder reactor
                                 0                                                                             0
                                 2000             2010         2020           2030       2040               2050                              technology would
                                        Reserves (US$80/kgU)    Reserves (US$130/kgU)   Nat. U demand (Million t U)
                                                                                                                                              change this
                                                                                                                                              development

                                                                                                                                                                    6
Energy situation in Norway

                             • 100% hydro power
                             • Production
                               matches the
                               consumption
                             • Large fluctuations
                               in production due
                               to weather
                               variations
                             • Import/export via
                               power cables to
                               Sweden, Finland,
                               Netherlands

                                                7
Thorium as nuclear fuel
• Thorium has been used as nuclear fuel since the 1960s
• Preparation of thorium fuel is more complex and expensive than
  that of uranium fuel
• Thorium as a nuclear fuel is technically well established and
  behaves remarkably well in various reactors
• Reprocessing thorium fuel is complicated and will require a
  substantial effort for the development of a commercial plant
• Waste management will in principal follow known procedures and
  methods
• Radiation protection requirements for the thorium cycle might be
  lower than those of the uranium cycle
• Technically, one of the best ways to dispose of a plutonium stock
  pile is to burn it in a thorium-plutonium MOX fuel

                                                                      9
Nuclear reactors for thorium fuel
     • U-233 has some very attractive properties as fissile material
          – U-233 emits so many neutrons per fission that they can sustain a chain
            reaction AND breed new U-233 from Th-232

     number of neutrons
=
     produced
     per neutron captured

                                                                                     10
Nuclear reactors for thorium fuel
• Advantage
   – Practically NO production of longlived transuranic elements
     -> reduced radiotoxicity of waste

• Disadvantage
   – Smaller percentage of delayed neutrons
     -> more difficult to control in extreme situations
   – Management of parasitic Pa-233
     -> difficult reactor operation (online re-fuelling, special seed-blanket
     geometry)
                                                                                11
(Industrial) experience with thorium in nuclear
reactors

Country                 Name             Type   Power      Operation

Germany                 AVR              HTGR   15 MWe     1967 - 1988

Germany                 THTR             HTGR   300 MWe    1985 - 1989

UK, OECD-EURATOM
also Norway, Sweden &   Dragon           HTGR   20 MWth    1966 -1973
Switzerland

USA                     Fort St Vrain    HTGR   330 MWe    1976 – 1989

USA, ORNL               MSRE             MSBR   7.5 MWth   1964 – 1969

                        Shippingport &   LWBR   100 MWe    1977 – 1982
USA
                        Indian Point     PWR    285 MWe    1962 – 1980

                        KAMINI,                 30 kWth
India                   CIRUS &          MTR    40 MWth    In operation
                        DHRUVA                  100 MWth

                                                                          12
Shippingport light water reactor
                              • Light water
                                breeding
                                reactor
                                   – Fuelled with
                                     U-233 and
                                     Th-232
                                   – Produced
                                     1.4% more
                                     fuel than it
                                     burned

        Pennsylvania, USA                           13
Status of thorium projects today
• Most projects using thorium were terminated by
  the end of the 1980s

• Main Reasons
   – The thorium fuel cycle could not compete economically
     with the well-known uranium cycle
   – Lack of political support for the development of nuclear
     technology after the Chernobyl accident
   – Increased worldwide concern regarding the
     proliferation risk associated with reprocessing of spent
     fuel

• Except for India
   – long term energy plan which includes a complicated
     scheme of plutonium and thorium fuel

                                                                16
Future nuclear energy systems using thorium

• Goal
   – self-sustaining thorium fuel cycle (no U-235, U-238 or plutonium)
• Two potential reactor types (conceptual level)
   – Molten salt reactor
       » One of the reactor types of the roadmap of the Generation IV
         International Forum
       » Not specially designed for thorium
       » 20-30 years of R&D
   – Accelerator Driven System (ADS)
       » Proton accelerator + spallation target + subcritical reactor core
       » Very versatile and flexible concept
       » Part of the EURATOM FP6 roadmap
         (MYRRHA project in Belgium)
       » Considered at the moment for the
         transmutation of waste
         (and not for energy production)
       » 20-30 years of R&D
                                                                             17
Thorium market

            • There is no market for
              thorium as of today
            • By-product of rare
              earth element mining
            • Total amount of
              thorium produced
              worldwide:
              37 500 tonnes
              (US, Australia,
              China, India)

                                       22
Thorium in Norway
          World Thorium Reserves and Reserve Base (Resources)

         700 000                                                                                                 US Geological Survey claims that:
         600 000
                                                                                                                 •   Norway has one of the major thorium
         500 000
                                                                                                                     reserves in the world.
Tonnes

         400 000
         300 000                                                                                  Reserve Base
         200 000                                                                                  Reserves
         100 000
              0
                                                Norway

                                                                                                                 The Geological Survey of Norway:
                                                                              Brazil
                               India
                                       United

                                                                                       Malaysia
                                       States

                                                                  countries

                                                                     Africa
                                                         Canada

                                                                     South
                   Australia

                                                                    Other

                                                                                                                 •   Thorium has never been specifically
                                                                                                                     explored for
                                                                                                                 •   Fen Complex most promising
                                                                                                                 •   Low concentration 0.1 – 0.4 wt%
                                                                                                                 •   Volume estimates are uncertain
                                                                                                                 •   Grain size too small for the traditional
                                                                                                                     flotation processes
                                                                                                                 •   Norway has a potential resource
                                                                                                                 •   More investigations necessary to
                                                                                                                     define as a reserve

                                                                                                                                                            23
Conclusions and recommendations (1)

  The potential contribution of nuclear energy to a
   sustainable energy future should be recognized.

 • Volume estimates of Norwegian thorium resources are
   uncertain; the grain size is too small for traditional
   extraction processes.
  It is essential to assess whether thorium in Norwegian
   rocks can be defined as an economical asset for the
   benefit of future generations.

 • The development of an ADS using thorium is not within the
   capability of a Norway working alone.
  Joining the European effort in that field should be
   considered.

                                                               24
Conclusions and recommendations (2)

 Norway should strengthen its international collaboration
  by joining the EURATOM fission programme and GIF
  programme on Generation IV reactors suitable for the use
  of thorium

• The proliferation resistance of uranium-233 depends on
  the reactor and reprocessing technologies.
 Due to the lack of experience with industrial-scale thorium
  fuel cycle facilities, similar safeguard measures as for
  plutonium are considered mandatory until otherwise
  documented.

                                                                25
Conclusions and recommendations (3)

• Any new nuclear activity in Norway, e.g. thorium fuel
  cycles, would need strong international pooling of human
  resources, and in the case of thorium strong long-term
  commitment.
 In order to meet the challenge related to the new nuclear
  era in Europe, Norway should secure its competence
  within nuclear sciences and nuclear engineering fields.

                                                              26
You can also read