The Surprisingly Contentious History Of Executive Orders
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
4/2/2020 The Surprisingly Contentious History Of Executive Orders | HuffPost
Ben Feuer, Contributor
Chairman, California Appellate Law Group
The Surprisingly Contentious History Of
Executive Orders
Cries of “unprecedented” executive action on both sides are more histrionic than
historical.
02/02/2017 04:59 am ET | Updated Feb 03, 2017
Despite howls that Presidents Trump and Obama both issued “unprecedented” executive
orders, presidents have embraced executive actions to enact controversial policies since
the dawn of the Republic.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-surprisingly-contentious-history-of-executive-orders_b_58914580e4b04c35d583546e 1/84/2/2020 The Surprisingly Contentious History Of Executive Orders | HuffPost
NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Recently, USA Today savaged President Trump’s executive orders since taking office, from
encouraging Keystone XL approval to altering immigration policy, as an “unprecedented
blizzard.” In 2014, the Washington Post raked President Obama for his Deferred Action
immigration directives, more commonly called DACA and DAPA, deeming them
“unprecedented” and “sweeping,” while Ted Cruz published an op-ed in the Wall Street
Journal lashing Obama’s “imperial” executive order hiking the minimum wage for federal
contractors as one with “no precedent.” A 2009 piece in Mother Jones lamented a
President George W. Bush executive order allowing former-presidents and their families to
block the release of presidential records as — you guessed it — “unprecedented.”
With all the talk of precedent, you might think executive orders historically did little more
than set the White House lawn watering schedule. But the reality is that presidents have
long employed executive actions to accomplish strikingly controversial objectives without
congressional approval. Their efforts have met with varying degrees of success — both in
courts of law and in the court of history.
Prose By Any Other Name
At the outset, the terminology is important. Several different documents are forms of
“executive action” by which the president instructs his subordinates in the executive branch
how their boss wants them to enforce the law.
The most prominent are “executive orders.” Trump’s order restricting immigration was an
executive order. Executive orders are the most formal. They have been numbered since
1907, and a law enacted in the 1930s required most (but not all) to be published in the
Federal Register. A JFK-era executive order requires later executive orders to cite legal
authority.
“Presidential memoranda,” once called presidential letters, are less formal but still direct
agency action just as forcefully as executive orders. In effect, they’re basically the same, but
presidential memoranda need not include any of the numbering, authority or even
publication features of executive orders (though the Trump and Obama administrations have
published many of theirs on the White House website and some in the Federal Register).
The Trump administration has begun issuing a new flavor of presidential memoranda called
“Presidential National Security Memoranda”; the reorganization of the National Security
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-surprisingly-contentious-history-of-executive-orders_b_58914580e4b04c35d583546e 2/84/2/2020 The Surprisingly Contentious History Of Executive Orders | HuffPost
Council to elevate Steve Bannon and demote military and intelligence officers came in one
of these memos.
“Presidential proclamations,” such as Trump’s presidential proclamation declaring his
Inauguration Day a “National Day of Patriotic Devotion,” are the least formal and have no
mandatory authority within the executive branch. They may be published in the Federal
Register, and are generally well respected by executive appointees. They typically include
such proclamations as flying flags at half-mast or creating a new national monument.
Executive orders are easier to track these days, with the publication and numbering
requirements, but presidential memoranda and proclamations are not. No one knows how
many memoranda there are or what they all cover. Historians estimate there may be as
many as 50,000 floating around.
The American Precedent
Although there is no explicit constitutional authority for executive actions, all presidents
have employed them, and scholars generally accept they are implied by Article II, Section
3’s requirement that the president “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”
Presidents Adams and Monroe issued one executive order apiece during their tenures, the
fewest of any president (save President William Harrison, who died after a month in office).
President Washington issued eight. Among them are an order that all Americans act
“friendly and impartial” in the war between Britain and France, and another establishing a
national day of Thanksgiving in late November.
President Lincoln issued 42 executive orders. His General War Order 1 sent Union troops to
war against “insurgent forces,” and another ordered the arrest of all newspaper editors
favoring the rebellion. The Emancipation Proclamation freeing slaves in southern states was
both a presidential proclamation and an executive order. President Grant, a former general
used to issuing orders, issued more than 200 of them. Several created modern Indian
Reservations, based only on broad congressional authority to relocate Native American
tribes.
President Franklin Roosevelt, in contrast, issued nearly 4,000 executive orders. His
Executive Order 9066 authorized the removal of any people from military areas “as deemed
necessary or desirable.” The military would later define the entire U.S. West Coast as a
“military area,” and order the removal of Japanese-Americans to internment camps.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-surprisingly-contentious-history-of-executive-orders_b_58914580e4b04c35d583546e 3/84/2/2020 The Surprisingly Contentious History Of Executive Orders | HuffPost
(Congress approved funding for internment by statute several months later, after only an
hour and a half of debate.) Roosevelt’s Executive Order 7034 organized the Works Progress
Administration, one of the central pillars of his response to the Great Depression, which
employed more than 3 million people and wielded a budget of nearly $70 billion in 2017
dollars.
Subscribe to the Politics email.
From Washington to the campaign trail, get the latest politics
news.
address@email.com SUBSCRIBE
The other World War president, Woodrow Wilson, issued nearly 2,000 executive orders,
including Executive Order 1885, which established U.S. sovereignty over the Panama Canal
Zone. President Truman issued Executive Order 9981, desegregating the military. Executive
Order 10730, during the Eisenhower era, sent federal troops to enforce desegregation in
Alabama schools. President Kennedy’s Executive Order 10924 established the Peace Corps,
while his Executive Order 10925 for the first time required government contractors to take
“affirmative action” to ensure non-discrimination in employment. President Johnson’s
Executive Order 11246 broke new ground in prohibiting discrimination in federal
employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and
President Ford’s Executive Order 11905 banned political assassination by intelligence
agencies.
President Reagan issued 381 executive orders; his Executive Order 12333 established the
National Security Agency. President Clinton issued 364 executive orders, including
Executive Order 13166, which declared the former Yugoslavia a “combat zone” and initiated
military action in Kosovo. The dozen years of both President Bushes saw 457 executive
orders on issues ranging from the collapse of the Soviet Union to the War on Terror.
President Obama issued 277 executive orders during his eight-year tenure, which is the
fewest for any two-term president since Grover Cleveland. These included Executive Order
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-surprisingly-contentious-history-of-executive-orders_b_58914580e4b04c35d583546e 4/84/2/2020 The Surprisingly Contentious History Of Executive Orders | HuffPost
13694, sanctioning Russia for cyberattacks during the 2016 elections, and Executive Order
13658, requiring federal contractors to pay an increased minimum wage.
Obama also utilized presidential memoranda and proclamations to accomplish significant
goals, and to a somewhat greater extent than prior presidents — Obama probably issued
about a third more memoranda than his immediate predecessor, President Bush, and
perhaps as many as his executive orders. But presidential memoranda aren’t all counted or
published, so it’s hard to know how many either issued precisely. Obama’s published
memoranda designated Alaskan coasts off-limits to drilling, altered immigration policy for
“Dreamers,” and set government research priorities.
Checked and Balanced
Executive actions can be, and often are, repealed. A new president can simply issue a new
executive order or memorandum that withdraws or replaces a previous one. Congress can
also legislate to overturn an executive order, or refuse to fund an executive action that
requires funding.
The courts have served as an occasional forum for challenging executive orders. In 1952, at
the height of the Korean War, strikes at steel mills led President Truman to issue Executive
Order 10340, which authorized the Secretary of Commerce to seize and nationalize steel
mills and require continuing operation. A lawsuit by the mill owners led the U.S. Supreme
Court to strike down Truman’s action as unconstitutional and in excess of his authority under
any legislation. The Court’s decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer forms the
basis for modern jurisprudence on the limits to presidential power.
Similarly, in 1996, President Clinton’s Executive Order 12954, which prohibited federal
contractors from replacing striking workers, saw defeat in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit. That court held the order conflicted with the National Labor
Relations Act.
CEO-in-Chief
In his first dozen days in office, Trump signed 18 public executive orders and memoranda.
Some were long expected and others rather humdrum; the “Mexico City Policy,” a Reagan-
era rule that withholds funding to international aid groups that perform abortions
irrespective of whether the funds go toward abortion services, has been reversed every
time the White House has switched parties. Others, such as the orders purporting to cut
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-surprisingly-contentious-history-of-executive-orders_b_58914580e4b04c35d583546e 5/84/2/2020 The Surprisingly Contentious History Of Executive Orders | HuffPost
federal funding to so-called “Sanctuary Cities” (Executive Order 13768) and to further efforts
to build a wall along the Mexican border (Executive Order 13767) have been highly
controversial. Trump’s Proclamation 9571 proclaimed a “National School Choice Week,” a
first-of-its-kind celebration of private, charter, and home schooling, but not public school.
While Trump followed Clinton’s path in signing an executive action on the first day (Executive
Order 13765, requiring federal agencies to minimize the burden of the Affordable Care Act),
Clinton’s order establishing stricter ethical guidelines for government employees was a lot
less divisive.
To be sure, Trump’s 18 executive actions are one less than President Obama’s 19 during the
same two-week period. But what is clearly novel is that Trump is making a much bigger and
more aggressive show of his early executive actions. Unlike Obama, who tended to sign
executive actions privately, Trump likes big signing ceremonies in the Oval Office. A
business executive without experience in politics, Trump is likely more comfortable with the
immediacy of executive actions than the push-and-pull of crafting legislation. And as a
political matter, he probably sees executive actions as a tool to show that he is fulfilling
campaign promises quickly and that he stands for “action” and “change.” (One big change,
however, is that the Trump administration has not yet sought input from an array of
administrative agencies impacted by his executive actions, a stark break with past practice.)
Ultimately, cries of “unprecedented” executive action on both sides are more histrionic than
historical. Yet because they are so easily overturned, repealed, or limited by law, presidents
have wisely preferred legislation to executive actions when crafting policy. Accordingly, the
ultimate impact of Trump’s executive actions thus far (and to come) remains to be seen.
Some will surely affect the lives of hundreds or thousands or more, for better or for worse,
while others may serve as little more than symbolic point-scoring with partisan
constituencies in the next election.
After all, one of President Obama’s first executive actions in 2009, Executive Order 13492,
ordered the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention camp in Cuba. Today, nearly a
decade later, the operational camp still houses more than 40 detainees.
Do you have information you want to share with HuffPost? Here’s how.
BEFORE YOU GO
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-surprisingly-contentious-history-of-executive-orders_b_58914580e4b04c35d583546e 6/84/2/2020 The Surprisingly Contentious History Of Executive Orders | HuffPost
00:56
Senator Explains Truth GOP Can't Admit: Trump's
Nominees Have Reason To Lie
MORE:
Barack Obama Bill Clinton George W Bush Ronald Reagan John F. Kennedy
MOST SHARED
Congress Wants A U.S. U.S. Navy Anthony Fauci To Sean Hannity Has
Do-Over On Its Unemployment Relieves Receive More Full-On Meltdown
Coronavirus Claims Hit Commander Of Personal Security Over Criticism Of
Debacle Another Record Coronavirus- After Threats: Fox News
High stricken Aircraft Reports Coronavirus
Carrier, Report Coverage
Says
WHAT’S HOT
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-surprisingly-contentious-history-of-executive-orders_b_58914580e4b04c35d583546e 7/84/2/2020 The Surprisingly Contentious History Of Executive Orders | HuffPost
19 Tweets That Fauci Suggests Need Republicans Are Searing Supercut
Hilariously Nail Social For National Lockdown Bragging About An Makes Mincemeat Of
Distancing For An As More States Issue Unemployment Boost Mike Pence’s Trump
Introvert Stay-At-Home Orders They Voted Against Coronavirus Defense
As Unemployment Jimmy Fallon’s Ryan Reynolds Says Lou Dobbs: Health
Claims Surge, Millions Awkward ‘Interview’ Isolation Has Been Experts Not
Are Still Waiting For With Lady Gaga Educational, But He’s Recognizing Donald
Expanded Benefits Deserves Applause, ‘Mostly Drinking’ Trump’s ‘Leadership’
Applause, Applause
NEWS POLITICS
ENTERTAINMENT LIFE
COMMUNITIES HUFFPOST PERSONAL
VIDEO NEWSLETTERS
HUFFPOST ABOUT US
ADVERTISE ABOUT OUR ADS
CONTACT US RSS
FAQ CAREERS
ARCHIVE USER AGREEMENT
PRIVACY POLICY COMMENT POLICY
HUFFPOST PRESS ROOM COUPONS
Do not sell my info Part of HuffPost Politics. ©2020 Verizon Media. All rights reserved. Huffington Post.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-surprisingly-contentious-history-of-executive-orders_b_58914580e4b04c35d583546e 8/8You can also read
