Executive Function Support in and out of the Classroom
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Executive Function Support in and out of the Classroom Rick Bryck, Ph.D. Senior Academic Researcher; Associate Director LCIRT © Landmark College 2018 Executive Function The cognitive processes that regulate an individual’s ability to sustain self-directed behavior toward a goal. • Considered building block of higher level thought and cognition in humans. • More than 30 definitions and 33 constructs underlying EF (Barkley, 2011) • Involved in: Planning, problem solving, trouble shooting, inhibiting or delaying responding, and shifting attention, delaying gratification. © Landmark College 2018 Executive Function: History P h in e a s G a g e © Landmark College 2018 1
Executive Function: History Frontal lobe patients: Executive Dysfunction • NO impairments on language, memory, learning • IQ generally fine • Disorganized actions • Lack of strategies for everyday tasks • Perseverative behavior • Utilization behavior © Landmark College 2018 Cortical Development Conventional wisdom held that brain development was complete relatively early in development We now know that dynamic and continuing changes in brain architecture occur through development G ogtay et al. (2010) ADHD Brain Maturation Shaw et al., (2007), PNAS ©LandmarkCollege2017 2
Neuroplasticity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELpfYCZa87g C o g n itiv e L o a d • Learning is efficient when cognitive load doesn’t exceed working memory capacity – When extraneous loads are low – When intrinsic loads are appropriate to the learner’s ability level Extraneous Intrinsic Working Memory Load Load DoNot Copy © LCIRT Without 2018Permission C o g n itiv e L o a d • Factors limiting available working memory – W e a k n e s s in m e m o r y, a tte n tio n , o r e x e c u tiv e fu n c tio n s – L a n g u a g e d e fic its – P o o r ly a u to m a tiz e d s k ills – A n x ie ty o r o th e r a ffe c tiv e is s u e s Working Memory DoNot Copy © LCIRT Without 2018Permission 3
C o g n itiv e L o a d • Skills and strategies can reduce extraneous cognitive load and free up working memory – A u to m a tiz a tio n o f s k ills – A d d r e s s in g c o n fid e n c e a n d o th e r a ffe c tiv e is s u e s – E ffe c tiv e s tr a te g y u s e Working Memory DoNot Copy © LCIRT Without 2018Permission Executive Functions Clusters of Executive Functions (work together in various com binations) Activation Focus Effort Em otion M em ory Action Organizing, Focusing, Regulating Managing Utilizing prioritizing, sustaining, alertness, frustration working Monitoring and and shifting sustaining and memory and and self- activating to effort, and modulating accessing regulating attention to processing action work tasks speed emotions recall Adapted from Brown, T.E. (2001). Manual for Attention Deficit Disorder Scales for Children and Adolescents. © Landmark College 2018 Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) O rg a n iz in g , p rio ritiz in g , “EF breakdowns” in the classroom & •Can’t get started – “What to do first!” a c tiv a tin g •Assigning priorities to w o rk •Procrastination – putting off tasks until in an “emergency” situation •Getting to appointments on time •Estimating the time a task will take •Getting into the ‘academic mindset’ 1. A c tiv a tio n Brown, T. E. (2001) Manual for Attention Deficit Disorder Scales for Children and Adolescents © Landmark College 2018 4
Activators • S c a ffo ld c o m p re h e n s io n b y a c tiv a tin g o r s u p p ly in g b a c k g ro u n d k n o w le d g e © Landmark College 2018 Scaffold Comprehension: Connect new learning to old • K -W -L (K n o w -W a n t to K n o w -L e a rn e d ) • T ic k e t o u t th e D o o r • N o te R e v is io n : E la b o ra tiv e R e h e a rs a l • S tu d e n ts g e n e ra te te x t/e x a m q u e s tio n s • W h a t e ls e ? T h in k – P a ir – S h a re © Landmark College 2018 Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) O rg a n iz in g , Strategies for combating these challenges p rio ritiz in g , •“What’s one small step I can take right now?” & •Intentionally move back and forth between big a c tiv a tin g picture and details (“ant and eagle” view) to w o rk •Break the project down > very specific parts •Separate the set-up from the task •Use “next action” format when organizing or planning tasks 1. A c tiv a tio n •Establish max.+ min. – create a window of time •Identify and plan for hindrances to getting started © Landmark College 2018 5
Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) F o c u s in g , s u s ta in in g , & •Over/under focus on a task s h iftin g •Difficulty with distractions a tte n tio n to ta s k •Actively inefficient •Difficulty focusing, especially if uninterested •Perseveration 2. F o c u s © Landmark College 2018 Cognitive Flexibility • Switching mental sets (focus) to adapt to changing situations or transitions • Engaging in mental play for problem- solving or finding new options • Moving from big picture to details and vice versa Multi-tasking is bad! • Ophir, Nass, & W agner, 2009 © Landmark College 2018 Break up the work: Pomodoro technique 1. Decide on the task(s). 2. Set the timer (usually 20-25 minutes). 3. Work on the task until the timer rings. 4. After the timer ends, put a checkmark on a piece of paper. 5. After the first three checkmarks, take a short break (3–5 minutes), then go to step 2. 6. After four pomodoros (checkmarks), take a longer break (15–30 minutes), reset your checkmark count to zero, then go to step 1. •© Landmark College 2018 6
Apps to: Break up tasks, reduce distractions/multi-tasking • focusbooster • 30/30 – Divides your tasks into 30 minutes segments • Rescue Time – Accurate automatic time tracking of your mobile apps • Unplug and Reconnect – Do not disturb mode : can send an automatic “away message’ texts to callers • StayFocused & LeechBlock – Browser extension: block specified sites during certain times or set time limits © Landmark College 2018 Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) F o c u s in g , • Break up work with physical activity s u s ta in in g , & • For hyper focused: awareness of what s h iftin g contributes to hyper focus a tte n tio n to ta s k • Create max/min guidelines + timer • Verbalize to guide through transition • Use a fidget toy/manipulative • Stand up working • Make it a game/challenge. 2. F o c u s • Write out your intention • Identify and plan for obstacles © Landmark College 2018 Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) R e g u la tin g •Easily exhausted a le rtn e s s , s u s ta in in g •Slow processing speed e ffo rt, & •Sleep regulation difficulties p ro c e s s in g •Long-term project difficulties speed •Being still/quiet -- drowsiness in a lecture •Short, quick projects ok, but hard time sustaining longer ones •Speed/Accuracy tradeoff 3. E ffo rt © Landmark College 2018 7
Routines to Support Effort • Beginning of class • W riting down assignm ents • Form atting assignm ents • Handing in assignm ents • O rganizing notebooks and m aterials • Preparing for tests and projects • Taking out and putting away supplies • End of class (checking assignm ents, gathering m aterials) W hat else? adapted from Dawson & Guare, ©Executive Landmark College Skills 2018 and Adolescents, p.61) in Children Movement and Learning • Walk and talk idea generation • Walking stories and essays “Walking, Tinkertoys, and Legos” available at ldonline.org © Landmark College 2018 Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) R e g u la tin g •Self-observation: where does effort wane? a le rtn e s s , s u s ta in in g •Use multiple “pick up and put down” e ffo rt, & approaches p ro c e s s in g •Break task down into specific next actions speed •Use a timer •Work with a buddy •Identify and plan for obstacles •Movement! 3. E ffo rt © Landmark College 2018 8
Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) M a n a g in g •Easily frustrated and/or F ru s tra tio n & overwhelmed m o d u la tin g •Learned helplessness e m o tio n s •Hyper-focus on feelings •Blame others for problems •Overreacts •Short fuse •Overly sensitive 4. E m o tio n •Difficulty in modulating emotions © Landmark College 2018 ASD and emotion Gotts, Simmons, Milbury, Wallace, Cox, and Martin, 2012 © Landmark College 2017 Exercise, EF, & LD A D H D S tu d ie s • D e c re a s e d im p u ls iv ity in ra ts w / A D H D -lik e s y m p to m s . • Im p ro v e d a tte n tio n a n d c o g n itio n , re d u c e d b e h a v io ra l p ro b le m s in y o u n g c h ild re n w ith A D H D • ( V e r r e t e t a l., 2 0 1 2 ; M c K u n e , P a u tz , & L o m jb a r d , 2 0 0 4 ; S m ith e t a l, 2 0 1 3 ) 9
Exercise, EF, & LD A S D S tu d ie s M o to r & b e h a v io ra l im p ro v e m e n ts (Duronjić & Válková, 2010) S e lf-c o n fid e n c e , a n ti-s o c ia l b e h a v io r (p a re n t ra te d ) (Pan, 2010) M e ta -a n a ly s is : In c re a s e d s o c ia l s k (Sowa ills &&Meulenbroek, re d u c2012) e d s y m p to m s Exercise as Intervention • S c h e d u le it • B e s o c ia l • D o it a n y w h e re • e.g., NYT 7 min. workout app • D o w h a t y o u e n jo y • T h in k d iffe re n tly Mindfulness Based Interventions MBIs hold promise for improving EF • “non-judgmental attention to experience in the present moment” (Tang et al., 2005) • Reduced academic anxiety, improved emotional regulation, and reduced depression (Shapiro et al., 2008) • ADHD symptom reduction (Hepark et al., 2015), • Significant reduction in depression, anxiety, and rumination; increased positive affect in an ASD intervention group (Spek et al., 2013) • Improvements in WM capacity in adolescents; > than Hatha yoga group (Quach et al., 2016) http://marc.ucla.edu/mindful-meditations © Landmark College 2018 10
Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) M a n a g in g •Lead with empathy and understanding F ru s tra tio n •Awareness of facts/feelings/thoughts & around specific situations m o d u la tin g •Create a “box” in which the student can e m o tio n s temporarily put the strong emotion •“Walk me through it”. Help visualize and develop awareness •Brainstorm alternative actions, then 4. E m o tio n practice © Landmark College 2018 Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) U tiliz in g w o rk in g m e m o ry & •Difficulty with hindsight and foresight a c c e s s in g •Difficulty remembering directions re c a ll •Difficulty remembering sequence of ideas •Hard to participate in group discussion or individual conversation •Hard to hold one bit of information while doing something else 5. M e m o ry © Landmark College 2018 © Landmark College 2018 11
Attention Loads • Distracters • Sensory distracters • Clutter and unnecessary complexity • Lack of perceived importance • Lack of context • No personal relevance • Split-attention effect • Information spatially scattered DoNot Copy © LCIRT Without 2018Permission S p lit A tte n tio n E ffe c t DoNot Copy © LCIRT Without 2018Permission In fo rm a tio n In te g ra tio n DoNot Copy © LCIRT Without 2018Permission 12
© Landmark College 2018 Recommendation: Space learning How to: Key is to design curriculum so that material is reviewed at least several weeks, if not months, after initial presentation • Use class time to review • Homework assignments contain old materials • Cumulative midterm and finals © Landmark College 2018 Recommendation: Interleaving • Students alternate practice / study of different kinds of items, problems, or topics Roher & Taylor (2007) © Landmark College 2018 13
Recommendation: Quizzing Evidence •Hundreds of laboratory exam ples of “testing effect” •Taking a test > spend sam e tim e studying the m aterial “By taking the test, student is practicing the art of recalling the inform ation from m em ory” •retrieval lays down new ‘m em ory’ traces © Landmark College 2018 Recommendation: Quizzing How -to • Closed book interval quizzes with feedback – Both formal or informal : no or low stakes! – Trivia/Jeopardy, flashcards, end of chapter problems, Cornell note-taking system – Flash Challenges • Tim e/effort to create new m aterial – Websites that allow teachers to create quizzes and puzzles quickly – Academic publishers often provide self-check quizzes, or electronic supplements © Landmark College 2018 Harold Pashler, 2007 © Landmark College 2018 14
Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) U tiliz in g •Write it down – all of it ! w o rk in g •Create visuals, diagrams, mind maps m e m o ry & •Self-testing (e.g. flash cards) a c c e s s in g •Distribute practice – space learning sessions re c a ll •Interleave – study different subjects in chunks •Elaboration--integrate into what is already known, relate to areas of interest •Teach and create mnemonics 5. M e m o ry •© Landmark College 2018 Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) M o n ito rin g & s e lf- •Difficulty holding back action and/or re g u la tin g a c tio n engaging in action •Acting impulsively •Difficulty acting effectively in a group •Executing the appropriate action when needed 6. A c tio n © Landmark College 2018 Inhibition (Self-Restraint and Self-Control) Inhibiting the tendency to: •Quit in frustration, boredom or anger •Procrastinate or do nothing •Blurt out the first response that comes to mind •Do what is immediately satisfying •Prematurely shift focus or hyper-focus © Landmark College 2018 15
1. Wish Have students verbalize an im portant goal the wish to achieve. It should be feasible, yet som ewhat challenging goal they can Make a W.O.O.P. achieve in the near future (within say a few weeks). 2. Outcome Have students im agine what life would be like if this wish was achieved. W hat would the best future look like after achieving this positive outcom e? How would it m ake you feel? 3. Obstacle Im agine what is the m ost critical barrier, within you, that is holding you back? Could be an em otion, bad habit, or belief. 4. Plan *Adapted fromthe woopmylife.orgwebpage Have students m ake an effective plan to overcom e the obstacle, using an if-then statem ent. Such as: “If… (obstacle), then I will … (action or thought). Evidence -base: e.g., Duckworth et al., 2011, Education Psychology; Duckworth et al, Social Psychological and Personality Science 2013; Oettingen et al., European Journal of Social Psychology, 2015 ©LandmarkCollege 2018 if – th e n p la n s aka “implementation intentions” Explicitly teach these to students Can be rehearsed in the mind as self-instruction • If Kyle asks m e to play video gam es at his house, I will say ’no thank you’ • W hen the waiter ask for my order I will say “salad” • W hen my room m ates invite m e to the party, I will say I’m studying tonight • W hen I write a sentence, then I will read it aloud to see if it m akes sense • If an assignm ent is given by the instructor, I will write it down im m ediately and put it in my to-do list • If I’m worried about a test next week, I will m eet with my teacher this week to talk about how to study Forming such clear plans has been found to be remarkably effective –average effect size on performance is around .60 ( G o llw it z e r & O e t t in g e n , 2 0 1 2 ) ©LandmarkCollege 2018 Why do we care about metacognition? Metacognitive awareness shown to compensate for IQ and lack of prior knowledge (Swanson, 1990) Successful students are self- aware &strategies learning modifytheir “thermostat of learning” ©LandmarkCollege 2018 16
But is metacognition malleable? Math performance improved when taught metacognitive prompting ( Kramarski & Zeichner, 2001; Mevarech & Kramarski, 1997) “ w h a t is t h is p ro b le m a b o u t ? ” “ w h a t s te p s a re y o u u s in g to s o lv e t h is p ro b le m ? ’ Meta-analysis found training on both cognitive AND metacognitive skills effective. A v e ra g e e ffe c t s iz e to b e .5 7 o n a c a d e m ic p e r fo r m a n c e (Hattie, Biggs, Purdie, 1996) Metacognition in Practice: Cognitive Wrappers Try it yourself! -Brainstorm some questions to ask students as a wrapper. -Include both broad questions, and questions specific to your course http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designte Gezer-Tem pleton et al, 2017 ach/teach/examwrappers/ © Landmark College 2018 Executive Function Model Executive Functions (work in various combinations) M o n ito rin g & •Develop awareness of facts, feelings, thoughts, s e lf- sensations around specific situations re g u la tin g •Say to student “ walk me through it to help him a c tio n visualize situation and develop awareness •Brainstorm alternative actions. Then practice envisioning or acting out alternative actions • Ask student to imagine what the feelings, thoughts, sensations might be with new 6. A c tio n approach • Suggest “try it as an experiment” © Landmark College 2018 17
You can also read