THE SACRAMENTO KINGS AND THE RAIL YARD ARENA - CHRISTOPHER F THORNBERG, PHD FOUNDING PARTNER BEACON ECONOMICS
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The Sacramento Kings and the Rail Yard Arena Christopher F Thornberg, PhD Founding Partner Beacon Economics
Background and Bio Christopher Thornberg is founding partner of Beacon Economics, LLC and an expert in the study of regional economies, real estate dynamics, labor markets and business forecasting. yDr. Thornberg has established a reputation as one of California’s leading economic forecasters. He is currently chief economic advisor to the California State Controller's Office and serves as Chair of California State Controller John Chiang’s Council of Economic Advisors – the body that advises the state’s chief fiscal officer about emerging economic issues. yDr. Thornberg also serves on the advisory board of Paulson & Co. Inc., one of Wall Street’s most successful hedge funds. He has been involved in a number of special studies measuring the effect of important events on the economy. These include the NAFTA treaty, the California electricity crisis, port security, California’s water transfer programs, and the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. yPrior to launching Beacon, he was an economist with UCLA’s Anderson Forecast where he regularly authored economic outlooks for California, Los Angeles, and the East Bay. He also developed a number of specialized forecasts for various regions and industries. Previously he has taught in the MBA program at UC San Diego’s Rady School of Business, at Thammasat University in Bangkok, Thailand, and has held a faculty position in the economics department at Clemson University. yDr. Thornberg holds a Ph.D in Business Economics from The Anderson School at UCLA, and a B.S. in Business Administration from the State University of New York at Buffalo. Beacon Economics
Three Worrying Assumptions y Ticket Revenues { Assumptions for gate receipts unrealistically high { No accounting for club seats cannibalization of non-premium ticket sales y Sacramento Fiscal Situation { City’s finances are currently in dire shape { Critical funding needs not being addressed { Unrealistic expectations of the potential financial windfall could turn this arena into a white elephant y Construction Time / Funding { CEQA, infrastructure, historic preservation, permitting, taxpayer revolts { Will the arena be built by the 15-16 season? { How will the almost-certain delays impact the financial viability of the proposed arena? Beacon Economics 2 www.BeaconEcon.com
Current Revenue Projections Current assumptions { Almost a tripling of revenues between this season and 15-16 Current Projections { Justifications; recovering economy, new arena ‘bump’, 100% club seat sales Realistic Estimates { Use local economic situation, (employment, home prices, local spending) { Account for substitution effect, club seats from regular seating { 85% Club Seat Sales, league average Results of Analysis { Best case scenario, annual revenues come in $5 million below projections { Worst case, $15 million below Regular season revenues only projections *1999, 2012 Adjusted for shortened season Beacon Economics 3
Sacramento Fiscal Issues y Sacramento Current Budget Problems { City revenues down $60 million from 08-09, current budget shortfall $40 million { Parks cut 75%, FTE employment in Fire and Police down to 1500 from 1900 { Unemployment still close to 11%, and job growth still negative { Long term issues with pension benefits { Still facing overall economic uncertainty due to levy issues y Can the city truly afford this arena plan? { $230 million based on monetization of parking revenues—will those revenues actually be raised? { City no longer has redevelopment agency powers, which was going to be used for the infrastructure development—how will this be funded? { City’s estimate of fiscal impact of arena, based on study that assumes 3.1 million visitors per year up from 1.5 million now. Ù Study seems to use full visitor count, not accounting for 5 mile shift in location Ù Any net impact for new visitors? Only visitors from outside Sacramento help Ù Plenty of academic research that shows these studies highly overestimate the true impact { Slump in real estate restricts potential short run value of secondary development Beacon Economics 6 www.BeaconEcon.com
Potential Delays y Voter Initiative Process { Sacramento Taxpayer Opposed to Pork (S.T.O.P.) initiative to prevent any public funding from going to Arena { In 2006 2 measures, Q and R, were on ballot. Q said new sales taxes for arena, R for new revenues for any purpose { Q failed with 71% No, R failed with 80% no. y Rail Yards { Still have to pass CEQA environmental review process { Possible issues with historic artifacts, landmark designation, ground contamination { Unlikely to get Governor’s sign off on expedited process; against public funding for , no GHG, Silver Leed Certified { No design plans or construction bids—still speculative Beacon Economics 7 www.BeaconEcon.com
Case Studies y Stockton { Close to being largest municipal bankruptcy—in part due to public financing of ballpark and arena y San Diego Baseball Stadium { Voters passed initiative to restrict public funding to $225 million. City later agreed to $299 million { 1998 start, but 2 year delay, opened in 2004 instead of 2002 { Massive litigation was over public funding { Overall project $45 million over budget y Glendale, AZ { Coyotes moved into Glendale Arena/ Jobing.com Arena owned by the city of Glendale in late 2003. { Team has never made a profit since moving from Winnipeg in 1996 and lost $54.8 million in 2008 alone { City currently pays $25 million to keep team in city Beacon Economics 5 www.BeaconEcon.com
Our Services ¾ Economic, revenue & occupational forecasting ¾ Economic impact analysis To view or download this presentation ¾ Regional economic analysis please visit: www.BeaconEcon.com ¾ Economic policy analysis ¾ Real estate market analysis Chris@BeaconEcon.com ¾ Industry & market analysis 310‐571‐3399 ¾ EB‐5 economic analysis For additional information visit www.beaconecon.com
You can also read