THE NEW ROLE OF COMPANIES IN SPACE EXPLORATION
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
JUNE. 2020 | VOL. 1 THE NEW ROLE OF COMPANIES IN SPACE EXPLORATION EXTRACTED FROM AVILA MENTORS OBSERVER / JUNE 2020 THE EVOLUTION OF SPACE RACE Written by Luis A. Leon-Marino On July 20th, 1969 mankind achieved one of the greatest milestones so far: reaching the Moon’s surface and setting foot on it. Getting to our only natural satellite, at 384,400 km, was a long dream for humans, and a large investment and research program helped to accomplish the mission. This dream came true through NASA’s (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) Apollo missions, which ran from 1961 to 1972, ending "Getting to our only natural the space race the US and the USSR started in satellite, at 384,400 km, was a 1957 with the launching of the Sputnik satellite long dream for humans" by the latter in 1957.
All these missions, and thus, the whole space race between both superpowers, was entirely financed with public funds, and where the participation from private sector companies was mainly focused on the provision of hardware and the specific equipment, required for the type of mission. In fact, at the peak of the space race (around 1966), NASA’s budget alone represented 4.41% of the whole USA’s GDP "at the peak of the space race (around 1966), NASA’s budget ($5,933 million – equivalent to $43,554 million alone represented 4.41% of the nowadays, after adjustments for inflation), whole USA’s GDP" which accounts for the importance of the space program within the budget expenditure of the US. Achieved this goal, the space program and NASA itself received less and less funding for research and development (compared to the previous mentioned figures) in the following years, although they still sent missions for exploration and developed the Space Shuttle program. However, further space exploration, technology development, going back to the Moon, or humans stepping on Mars’ surface was "the space program and NASA something that could hardly be achieved relying itself received less and less funding for research and solely on government funds. development (compared to the previous mentioned figures) in the following years"
The Challenger Space Shuttle accident on February 1st 2003 prompted the cancellation of the this program, with the last flight taking place in 2011, and paved the way for new proposals to be made in regards of the transportation of crews and cargo to and from space and beyond. Nevertheless, a new approach was necessary to be created. Government expenditure in the space was probably never going to be the same as 60 years ago, as other issues have more prevalence than space exploration. The private sector, on the other hand, looks eager to adventure themselves as main protagonists in this new era of space exploration, investing their money and putting their development capacity to test with the construction of new models, "The Challenger Space Shuttle prototypes, and ways to reach space. This was accident on February 1st 2003 the beginning of the Private Public Partnerships prompted the cancellation of (PPP) between NASA and private companies. the this program, with the last flight taking place in 2011..." "Competition began with the signature of Space Act Agreements (SAAs) with two companies, SpaceX and Orbital Sciences Corp."
The first steps taken were towards granting alternatives to get cargo shipments regularly to the International Space Station (ISS), for what NASA developed the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program in 2006, aiming at a larger participation of the private sector in the development of spacecrafts and rockets for this purpose. Competition began with the signature of Space Act Agreements (SAAs) with two companies, SpaceX and Orbital Sciences Corp. (later reorganised as Northrop Grumman Space Systems), aiming to start operational services in 2011. This relation is now managed under Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) contracts, and includes a third company, Sierra Nevada Corporation, for the launch of cargo to the ISS. From all the vehicles developed by these "From all the vehicles companies, the only one that can be reused at developed by these companies, the moment is the SpaceX Dragon Capsule, the only one that can be reused at the moment is the SpaceX while NASA uses other non-reusable capsules Dragon Capsule" for trash-disposal from the ISS, like the Progress (Russia), the ATV (European construction), the HTV (Japan) and the Cygnus capsule from Northrop Grumman.
Regarding commercial crews, the Obama administration made the first proposal to rely more on the commercial sector to travel astronauts to and from low Earth orbit (LEO), also carrying them to and from the ISS. For this reason, the Constellation program (initiated under the George W. Bush administration, and aimed at finishing the ISS, reaching the Moon again, and finally, Mars) was cancelled, and additional budget for NASA was requested to the Congress in order to subsidize companies in the research and development from vehicles and spaceships able to transport crew to space. This program was originally named Crew "These companies were United Transportation Concepts and Technology Launch Alliance, Sierra Demonstration, or CCDEV, later transitioning Nevada Corp., Blue Origin, Boeing, and Paragon Space into the Commercial Crew Integrated Capability Development Corp." (CCiCAP) program, aimed at commercial companies looking actively to develop an combined crew transportation system (spacecraft, launch vehicle, and ground systems). "The next year, a second group of companies was added to the first one, among them, SpaceX."
History began in 2010, when NASA awarded the first contracts for companies to develop crew transportation concepts and technology. These companies were United Launch Alliance (Lockheed Martin Space Systems and Boeing Defense, Space & Security), Sierra Nevada Corp., Blue Origin, Boeing, and Paragon Space Development Corp. The next year, a second group of companies was added to the first one, among them, SpaceX. Under the SAA rules, NASA pay these companies for reaching pre-arranged milestones, with less surveillance or information from NASA to know what companies are doing, compared with previous types of contracts employed by the agency. Although the systems are being made by these private companies, taxpayer money is, in a large proportion, financing these ventures, with almost $800 million invested in the commercial cargo program (COTS), and about $4.8 and $3.1 billion awarded to Boeing and SpaceX, respectively, for the development of a crew transportation system. NASA is moving towards buying services from these companies, and not the whole equipment, as it did in previous space programs.
On this year 2020, in the middle of unprecedented times and consequences arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, NASA continued further with its crew program and achieved the successful launch and docking on the ISS from the first time astronauts flying on a commercial capsule, the Crew Dragon from SpaceX. Although the mission is yet far from finished, and the astronauts need to return safely to Earth for NASA’s to certify the capsule for operational use, the forecast looks promising so far, something that can even open the possibility for space tourists to arrive at the ISS in the "...docking on the ISS from the upcoming years. first time astronauts flying on a commercial capsule, the Before the Crew Dragon capsule, NASA relied on Crew Dragon from SpaceX." Russian Soyuz capsules, at a cost of $82-90 million per seat, which contrast enormously with the $55 million per seat that costs flying with the SpaceX capsule. That is exactly one of NASA’s goals: reducing the economic cost of space travel. Not so long ago, the Space Shuttle costed $4 billion per year to operate. The greater amount of money that can be saved from every launching, the more it can be invested in new technology and development, from spacecrafts to new telescopes, or rovers and space stations to study Mars.
As of today, several private companies develop all kind of technologies for this matter, including more advanced activities like space mining and space stations through independent modules. This new space race, with private companies running against each other to grant loans and contracts with government space agencies, but also to be the first achieving a regular space tourism service down to an affordable price, "There is a valid and optimistic expectation to should spark a flame of new discoveries and growth faster in the space rapid progress on this matter. This will also technology field." create a whole new industry, with thousands of employments to be filled by a wide array of careers, from engineering to lawyers and even medical personnel. There is a valid and optimistic expectation to growth faster in the space technology field. Next milestones to be achieved are both returning to the Moon (probably by 2024) surface and getting to Mars by 2033. Private companies are destined to be main actors of these next missions, with Elon Musk, owner of SpaceX developing a rocket to transport people to Mars in the near future; while Jeff Bezos, owner of Blue Origin, says he dreams of future "Private companies are destined to be main actors of space colonies for housing millions of humans. these next missions" LALM / l.leon@avilamentos.co.uk
You can also read