The IRS and Treasury Speak - NASPP
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Speakers Amber Salotto* U.S. Treasury Department amber.salotto@treasury.gov Stephen Tackney* Internal Revenue Service Stephen.B.Tackney@irscounsel.treas.gov Stephen LaGarde Ernst & Young LLP stephen.lagarde@ey.com Deborah Walker Cherry Bekaert LLP DWalker@cbh.com *Government speakers did not participate in the preparation of these slides 2
Agenda • Deferral of employee social security tax • GLAM 2020-004 and IRM procedural update • Section 162(m) • Section 409A • Section 83(i) • Form 1099-NEC 3
Presidential Memorandum (August 8, 2020) • Directs Treasury to use section 7508A authority “to defer the withholding, deposit, and payment of” the employee portion of social security tax on wages paid September 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020, subject to two conditions: − Limited to employees whose bi-weekly wages are less than $4,000 (adjusted for other payroll periods) − No penalties, interest, etc. on deferred taxes • Directs Treasury to “explore avenues, including legislation, to eliminate the obligation to pay the taxes deferred” 5
Notice 2020-65 and IR-2020-195 (August 28, 2020) • Employer is “allowed” to defer withholding and payment of the employee share of social security tax from September 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020 • Deferred tax must be withheld and paid ratably from wages paid between January 1, 2021, and April 30, 2021, or interest, penalties, and additions to tax will begin to accrue on May 1, 2021 • If necessary, employer “may make arrangements to otherwise collect” the deferred taxes • Clarifies that $4,000 threshold is applied each pay period irrespective of amounts paid in other pay periods − No distinction between regular wages and supplemental wages (such as equity-based compensation or bonuses) 6
Considerations • Employee relations • Employer’s tax/financial exposure − Responsible party liability • Administrative challenges • Likelihood of forgiveness − For employees with deferred taxes − For all employees • Politics • Additional guidance? 7
GLAM 2020-004 and IRM procedural update 8
Live Polling Question How familiar are you with GLAM 2020-004 and the IRM procedural update? A. Not at all familiar B. Have heard of them, but don’t know what they say C. Somewhat familiar with the contents D. Very familiar 9
Background • 2003 Field Directive − Payroll deposit timing rule based on T+3 SEC rule − Applied only to NSOs (nonqualified stock options) • 2012 IRM 20.1.4.26.2 update − Incorporated 2003 Field Directive rule based on T+3 SEC rule − Applied only to NSOs • 2017 SEC settlement cycle regulations − Changed T+3 to T+2 • 2020 − GLAM 2020-004 (May 18, 2020) − IRM 20.1.4.26.2 update (May 26, 2020) 10
GLAM 2020-004 (May 18, 2020) • Stock-settled SARs (stock appreciation rights) and NSOs − Subject to FITW and FICA upon exercise − Deposit due by close of the next day (if at least $100k of employment taxes accumulated) • Stock-settled RSUs (restricted stock units) − Subject to FITW and FICA “when Employer initiates the payment of shares of stock” − Deposit due by close of the next day (if at least $100k of employment taxes accumulated) 11
Observations • RSU facts are unusual − “The terms of the RSU provide that the payment of shares will occur on the date the vesting condition is satisfied” so “Employer initiates payment” on the vesting date − More typically, vesting and payment would not occur on the same date − GLAM treats the date the employer “initiates payment” (not vesting) as the relevant date • Income tax treatment of RSUs − The GLAM treats stock-settled RSUs as section 83 property − Compare, for example, Treas. Reg. § 1.451-2 (constructive receipt rules apply to a “stock bonus”) and Treas. Reg. § 1.83-3(e) (section 83 property does not include “an unfunded and unsecured promise to pay money or property in the future”) − Whether section 83 applies may affect the timing of the employer’s tax deduction as well as the employee’s income and withholding 12
Observations (continued) • FICA treatment of RSUs − “An RSU award is not a stock right and therefore provides for the deferral of compensation for purposes of I.R.C. § 3121(v).” − No mention of Treas. Reg. § 31.3121(v)(2)-1(b)(3)(iii) short-term deferral rule 13
IRM 20.1.4.26.2 update (May 26, 2020) • Narrowed to reflect T+2 SEC rule • Expanded to include stock-settled SARs and stock-settled RSUs as well as NSOs • Effective date? • What if an employer uses share withholding rather than sell-to-cover? 14
Section 162(m) 15
Live Polling Question Is your company relying on section 162(m) grandfathering? A. Yes B. No C. Don’t know D. Not applicable 16
Update on proposed section 162(m) regulations • Grandfathering rule issues − Modifying performance targets − Repricing (does it matter if 1:1 or value-for-value) − Cashing out underwater options − Acceleration of vesting − Extension of post-termination exercise period • Comments Treasury/IRS received • Timing of final regulations − Publication − Applicability date 17
Section 409A 18
Update on section 409A guidance • No Code Y reporting for 2020 • Current issues − Delaying 2020 payments until December 31, 2020 − Possible substitutions arising from agreeing to “forgo” compensation − Initial deferral elections − Unforeseeable emergencies o Cancellation of deferral election o Acceleration of payment o Coronavirus-related distributions from 401(k) plans (Notice 2020-50) • Status of rulemaking − 2008 proposed section 1.409A-4 “income inclusion” regulations − 2016 proposed “grab bag” regulations − 2016 proposed section 457(f) regulations 19
Section 83(i) 20
Update on section 83(i) guidance • Notice 2018-97 provided limited guidance − Rule requiring grant to 80% of employees applies annually, not cumulatively − Escrow arrangement required for income tax withholding − Employer may opt out • Any further guidance? 21
Live Polling Question Additional guidance on section 83(i) would be: A. Very helpful B. Helpful, but this is not a top priority C. Not helpful at all D. Not applicable 22
Form 1099-NEC 23
Background • PATH Act − Accelerated the due date for filing any Form 1099 that includes nonemployee compensation (NEC) from February 28 to January 31 − Eliminated the automatic 30-day extension for forms that include NEC • IRS response − Rather than having different Form 1099-MISC due dates depending on whether NEC is reported, the IRS created a “new” Form 1099-NEC beginning with tax year 2020 o “Experienced” practitioners may recall the original Form 1099-NEC from circa 1980 − Form 1099-MISC has been revised/rearranged in light of Form 1099-NEC 24
2020 Form 1099-MISC vs. 2020 Form 1099-NEC 25
Live Polling Question Do you have experience with the original Form 1099-NEC? A. Yes B. No C. Maybe D. Not applicable 26
Questions? 27
Thank You! 28
You can also read