The GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey - WHO | World Health ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
UN-WATER GLOBAL ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF SANITATION AND DRINKING-WATER (GLAAS)
The GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
About the GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
The GLAAS country survey asks for information on the delivery of drinking-water supply and sanitation services as
well as the status of hand hygiene activities. Questions in the survey focus on governance, monitoring, finance and
human resources and cover topics required for Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) monitoring. Information
gathered in this survey will be presented as part of the UN-Water GLAAS 2022 results. For more information about
GLAAS, please refer to:
https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/water-sanitation-and-health/monitoring-and-
evidence/wash-systems-monitoring/un-water-global-analysis-and-assessment-of-sanitation-and-drinking-water
The survey is organized in the following way:
Section A on governance
Section B on monitoring
Section C on human resources
Section D on finance
Questions include multiple choice and brief narratives.
For specific guidance on the GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey questions, please read the GLAAS 2021/2022 survey
guidance carefully and refer to it when needed. The survey guidance provides information on the GLAAS 2021/2022
cycle, the GLAAS country process, general survey instructions, as well as specific information on filling out the
survey. Before beginning the GLAAS country survey, and throughout the process, countries should review and refer to
the survey guidance document, including the glossary which provides definitions for specific terms. Terms used in the
water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) sector and their usage can vary by country. The glossary is therefore an
essential reference to avoid misinterpretations.
The GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey is provided as a fillable PDF form. It is highly recommended that the form be
used with an updated version of Adobe Acrobat Reader DC. A free version of Adobe Acrobat Reader can be
downloaded at: https://get.adobe.com/reader/. The country survey should be completed on the desktop version of
Adobe Reader and should not be filled out on a web browser version. The PDF can be saved and the respondent can
return to it as needed: it is not necessary to fill out the entire survey in one sitting. Please save the PDF at regular
intervals. If the PDF is not saved, responses will be lost.
If multiple respondents in the country provide information in several GLAAS survey forms, please note that the
GLAAS national focal person is responsible for compiling and reconciling all responses into one final country
submission in a single PDF survey form before sending to the GLAAS team at WHO.
For any questions on GLAAS, on the process or on the survey content, please contact the WHO regional office and
the GLAAS team at glaas@who.int.
Please return completed surveys to the WHO regional focal point and to glaas@who.int by 1 April 2022.
iWHO policy on the use and sharing of data collected by WHO in Member States
Data are the basis for all sound public health actions and the benefits of data-sharing are widely recognized, including
scientific and public health benefits. Whenever possible, the World Health Organization (WHO) wishes to promote the
sharing of health data, including but not restricted to surveillance and epidemiological data.
As used in this data collection tool, the term "Data provider" means a duly authorized representative of the governmental
body with authority to release health data of the country to WHO (i.e. the Ministry of Health or other responsible
governmental authority). The recipient of this data collection tool is responsible for ensuring that he/she is the Data
provider, or for providing this data collection tool to the Data provider.
In this connection, and without prejudice to information sharing and publication pursuant to legally binding instruments,
by providing data to WHO, the Data provider:
confirms that all data to be supplied to WHO (including but not limited to the types listed in Table 11) hereunder
have been collected in accordance with applicable national laws, including data protection laws aimed at
protecting the confidentiality of identifiable persons;
agrees that WHO shall be entitled, subject always to measures to ensure the ethical and secure use of the data,
and subject always to an appropriate acknowledgement of the country:
i. to publish the data, stripped of any personal identifiers (such data without personal identifiers being
hereinafter referred to as “the Data”) and make the Data available to any interested party on request (to the
extent they have not, or not yet, been published by WHO) on terms that allow non-commercial, not-for-profit
use of the Data for public health purposes (provided always that publication of the Data shall remain under
the control of WHO);
ii. to use, compile, aggregate, evaluate and analyse the Data and publish and disseminate the results thereof in
conjunction with WHO’s work and in accordance with the Organization’s policies and practices.
Except where data-sharing and publication are required under legally binding instruments (International Health
Regulations (2005), WHO Nomenclature Regulations 1967, etc.), the Data provider may in respect of certain data opt out
of (any part of) the above, by notifying WHO thereof in writing at the following address, provided that any such
notification shall clearly identify the data in question and clearly indicate the scope of the opt-out (in reference to the
above), and provided that specific reasons shall be given for the opt-out.
Director, Quality Assurance of Norms and Standards Department
World Health Organization
20, avenue Appia
1211 Geneva
Switzerland
☐ I have read and agree with the terms and conditions. For more information on the WHO Data Policy,
please refer to: https://www.who.int/about/policies/publishing/data-policy
Please note that the box above must be checked in order to proceed.
1
Please see Table 1 in the GLAAS 2021/2022 survey guidance document.
ii1. CONTACT INFORMATION: To ensure the most accurate data, WHO recommends that the national focal person coordinate the collection and reporting of your government’s responses to
the survey. Please indicate the national focal person for GLAAS and the persons responsible for compiling responses for the various focal areas of this survey.
Please ensure that you are using Adobe Acrobat Reader DC. A free version of Adobe Acrobat Reader can be downloaded at: https://get.adobe.com/reader/. Save the PDF at regular intervals.
Country:
Provide only one contact person per row.
First name Phone number Ministry/
Last name (surname)
(given name) of Email address (including country Job title Department/
of respondent
respondent code) Organization
GLAAS national focal person
Person responsible for compiling responses in the following areas:
Sanitation
Wastewater (if different from sanitation
above)
Drinking-water
Hand hygiene
WASH finance
WASH in health care facilities
WASH in schools
Drinking-water regulator
Wastewater regulator
Water resources management
Other area (please specify):
1GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
Section A: Governance
This section of the survey examines policies, plans and targets supporting the provision of water, sanitation and hand
hygiene. The section also examines the existence of regulatory frameworks, coordination mechanisms, roles and
responsibilities of government, and user and community participation in WASH.
Please consult the survey guidance for important information on the questions in Section A.
HUMAN RIGHTS TO WATER AND SANITATION
A1. Does the constitution or other law recognize water and/or sanitation as human rights?
Water Sanitation
Yes No Yes No
a. Constitution or other law
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If yes, what year (YYYY) was the
right recognized in the
constitution or law?
ii. Provide an excerpt of the text
where the right is recognized in
the constitution or law and the
title of the law (if applicable).
2GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
NATIONAL REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
A2. To what extent do regulations or standards exist for drinking-water, sanitation and wastewater, and WASH in health care facilities?
Drinking-water
Urban Rural
a. Are national drinking-water quality standards (i.e. parameters and limits/log
reductions) or equivalent in place? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Yes ☐ No
i. If yes, provide the name of the standard
ii. Provide the year of the standard (YYYY)
iii. Provide a link or attach a copy
b. Besides drinking-water quality, are national regulations or standards in place for
drinking-water service delivery requirements (e.g. continuity, cost, etc.)? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Yes ☐ No
i. If yes, provide the name of the standard
ii. Provide the year of the standard (YYYY)
iii. Provide a link or attach a copy
Sanitation and wastewater
Toilets, containment and conveyance If yes, provide the name of the standard or
c. Yes No Year (YYYY)
Are national regulations, standards or guidelines in place for any of the following: guidelines. Provide a link or attach a copy.
i. Minimum requirements for toilets (e.g. in planning and building
regulations, technical standards or guidelines, consumer protections) ☐ ☐
ii. Minimum requirements for containment and on-site treatment (e.g. for
pits and septic tanks through planning and building regulations, technical ☐ ☐
standards or guidelines, consumer protections)
iii. Minimum requirements for emptying and conveyance (e.g. through utility
regulation covering sewer networks) ☐ ☐
iv. Minimum requirements for emptying and conveyance (e.g. though
licencing of faecal sludge management service providers) ☐ ☐
3GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A2. (Continued from previous page)
d. Treatment and disposal/use
If yes, provide the name of the standard (or clarify if individual consents
Yes No Year (YYYY)
Are national regulations, standards or guidelines in place for the are issued). Provide a link or attach a copy.
following:
i. Technologies for treatment in on-site sanitation systems ☐ ☐
ii. Faecal sludge treatment* ☐ ☐
iii. Wastewater treatment* ☐ ☐
iv. Safe use of treated wastewater and/or sludge* ☐ ☐
* or in lieu of national standards, individual consents for wastewater treatment plants, and faecal sludge treatment plants discharges and for safe use applications of wastewater and sludge
e. Sanitation workers
Are national laws or regulations in place to ensure the health and If yes, provide the name of the legislation or regulation. Provide a link or
Yes No Year (YYYY)
attach a copy.
safety of any of the following sanitation workers:
i. Toilet cleaners (i.e. hired workers cleaning in public or
domestic settings) ☐ ☐
ii. Faecal sludge emptying, transport and treatment workers ☐ ☐
iii. Sewage and wastewater treatment plant workers ☐ ☐
WASH in health care facilities
If yes, provide the name of the standard or guidelines. Provide a link or
f. Are national standards or guidelines in place for the following: Yes No Year (YYYY)
attach a copy.
i. WASH in health care facilities ☐ ☐
ii. Health care waste management ☐ ☐
4GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
RISK MANAGEMENT APPROACHES
A3. Existence of risk management approaches: Are the following risk management approaches included in policies
and/or regulations or used in national WASH planning?
If included in policies/regulations,
Is the risk assessment/ Please provide the name, year and
risk management link (if available) to the
approach promoted or policy/regulations.
required?
a. Water safety plans (WSP)
or equivalent approach for
urban areas in
☐ Not included ☐ Promoted
policies/regulations
2
☐ Included in policies /regulations ☐ Required
b. Water safety plans (WSP)
or equivalent approach for
☐ Not included ☐ Promoted
rural areas in
policies/regulations
2
☐ Included in policies/regulations ☐ Required
c. Sanitation safety plans
(SSP) for local-level risk ☐ Not included ☐ Promoted
assessment and
management ☐ Included in policies/regulations ☐ Required
d. WHO Guidelines on
3
Sanitation and Health
(2018) used for national ☐ Guidelines not used If used, please
planning describe how they
☐ Guidelines used in national
have been used:
planning
e. Climate change
preparedness approaches If used, please
for WASH used in national ☐ Approach not used describe how the
planning approach has been
☐ Approach used in national
used in national
planning
planning.
2
For water safety plans, technical guidance (such as how-to manuals) should not be counted, only formalized policy/regulatory instruments that drive
implementation.
3
WHO Guidelines on Sanitation and Health (2018) available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/274939/9789241514705-eng.pdf
5GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A4. Implementing risk management approaches: To what extent is the risk assessment/risk management approach
implemented in your country?
a. Water safety planning Approximate number
(WSP) or equivalent ☐ Not implemented of urban WSPs
implemented
approach for urban areas ☐ Implementation at just a few pilot or
Approximate total
model sites number of urban
☐ Implementation at a significant scale drinking-water supply
systems in country
b. Water safety planning Approximate number
(WSP) or equivalent ☐ Not implemented of rural WSPs
implemented
approach for rural areas ☐ Implementation at just a few pilot or Approximate total
model sites number of rural
☐ Implementation at a significant scale drinking-water supply
systems in country
c. Sanitation safety planning Number of local
(SSP) for local-level risk ☐ Not implemented administrative units
4
assessment and implementing SSPs
☐ Implementation at just a few pilot or
management
model sites Total number of local
4
☐ Implementation at a significant scale administrative units in
country
d. Water and Sanitation for Number of health care
Health Facility ☐ Not implemented facilities implementing
Improvement Tool WASH FIT
(WASH FIT) or similar risk- ☐ Implementation at just a few pilot or
based improvement tool model sites
Total number of health
for WASH in health care ☐ Implementation at a significant scale care facilities in
facilities country
e. Climate change Number of local
4
administrative units
preparedness approaches ☐ Not implemented implementing climate
for local-level risk change preparedness
assessment and ☐ Implementation at just a few pilot or approaches
management of WASH model sites
Total number of local
☐ Implementation at a significant scale 4
administrative units in
country
4
The local administrative unit is to be determined by the government. Local administrative units are institutional units whose fiscal, legislative and executive
authority extends over the smallest geographical areas distinguished for administrative and political purposes (OECD: ttps://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=1550 ).
6GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
NATIONAL WASH POLICIES AND PLANS
A5I. Urban sanitation policy and plans/ strategies
To what extent does a national policy and implementation plan/strategy exist for urban sanitation? See the survey
guidance for definitions of ‘policy’ and ‘plan/strategy’.
a. Urban sanitation policy status National policy National policy
No national Existing policy
under formally
(choose one): policy under revision
development approved
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a policy exists, provide the
name of the policy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a
copy.
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY)
b. Urban sanitation plan/strategy No national Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
status (choose one): approved and approved and
implementation under approved, but
being partially being fully
plan/strategy development not implemented
implemented implemented
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a plan/strategy exists,
provide the name of the
plan/strategy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a copy:
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY):
iv. Has the plan/strategy been
costed? Yes ☐ No ☐
If costed, what is the total Currency of the Time period for cost
cost estimate? cost estimate estimate (YYYY to YYYY)
Between 75% and Between 95% and
Less than 50% of Between 50% and 74%
94% of what is 100% of what is
what is needed of what is needed
needed needed
v. Has the plan been supported
with adequate funding to
implement the plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
vi. Are there sufficient human
resources to implement the ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
plan?
7GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A5I. Rural sanitation policy and plans/strategies
To what extent does a national policy and implementation plan/strategy exist for rural sanitation?
c. Rural sanitation policy status National policy National policy
No national Existing policy
under formally
(choose one): policy under revision
development approved
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a policy exists, provide the
name of the policy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a
copy.
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY)
d. Rural sanitation plan/strategy No national Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
status (choose one): approved and approved and
implementation under approved, but
being partially being fully
plan/strategy development not implemented
implemented implemented
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a plan/strategy exists,
provide the name of the
plan/strategy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a copy.
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY)
iv. Has the plan/strategy been
costed? Yes ☐ No ☐
If costed, what is the total Currency of the Time period for cost
cost estimate? cost estimate estimate (YYYY to YYYY)
Between 75% and Between 95% and
Less than 50% of Between 50% and 74%
94% of what is 100% of what is
what is needed of what is needed
needed needed
v. Has the plan been supported
with adequate funding to
implement the plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
vi. Are there sufficient human
resources to implement the ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
plan?
8GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A5I. Urban drinking-water policy and plans/strategies
To what extent does a national policy and implementation plan/strategy exist for urban drinking-water?
e. Urban drinking-water policy National policy National policy
No national Existing policy
under formally
status (choose one): policy under revision
development approved
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a policy exists, provide the
name of the policy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a
copy.
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY)
f. Urban drinking-water No national Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
plan/strategy status (choose approved and approved and
implementation under approved, but
being partially being fully
one): plan/strategy development not implemented
implemented implemented
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a plan/strategy exists,
provide the name of the
plan/strategy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a copy.
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY)
iv. Has the plan/strategy been
costed? Yes ☐ No ☐
If costed, what is the total Currency of the Time period for cost
cost estimate? cost estimate estimate (YYYY to YYYY)
Between 75% and Between 95% and
Less than 50% of Between 50% and 74%
94% of what is 100% of what is
what is needed of what is needed
needed needed
v. Has the plan been supported
with adequate funding to
implement the plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
vi. Are there sufficient human
resources to implement the ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
plan?
9GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A5I. Rural drinking-water policy and plans/strategies
To what extent does a national policy and implementation plan/strategy exist for rural drinking-water?
g. Rural drinking-water policy National policy National policy
No national Existing policy
under formally
status (choose one): policy under revision
development approved
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a policy exists, provide the
name of the policy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a
copy.
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY)
h. Rural drinking-water No national Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
plan/strategy status (choose approved and approved and
implementation under approved, but
being partially being fully
one): plan/strategy development not implemented
implemented implemented
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a plan/strategy exists,
provide the name of the
plan/strategy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a copy.
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY):
iv. Has the plan/strategy been
costed? Yes ☐ No ☐
If costed, what is the total Currency of the Time period for cost
cost estimate? cost estimate estimate (YYYY to YYYY)
Between 75% and Between 95% and
Less than 50% of Between 50% and 74%
94% of what is 100% of what is
what is needed of what is needed
needed needed
v. Has the plan been supported
with adequate funding to
implement the plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
vi. Are there sufficient human
resources to implement the ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
plan?
10GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A5I. WASH in schools policy and plans/strategies
To what extent does a national policy and implementation plan/strategy exist for WASH in schools?
i. WASH in schools policy status National policy National policy
No national Existing policy
under formally
(choose one): policy under revision
development approved
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a policy exists, provide the
name of the policy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a
copy.
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY)
j. WASH in schools plan/strategy No national Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
status (choose one): approved and approved and
implementation under approved, but
being partially being fully
plan/strategy development not implemented
implemented implemented
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a plan/strategy exists,
provide the name of the
plan/strategy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a copy.
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY)
iv. Has the plan/strategy been
costed? Yes ☐ No ☐
If costed, what is the cost Currency of the Time period for cost
estimate for activities cost estimate estimate (YYYY to YYYY)
related to WASH in
schools?
Between 75% and Between 95% and
Less than 50% of Between 50% and 74%
94% of what is 100% of what is
what is needed of what is needed
needed needed
v. Has the plan been supported
with adequate funding to
implement the plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
vi. Are there sufficient human
resources to implement the ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
plan?
11GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A5I. WASH in health care facilities policy and plans/ strategies
To what extent does a national policy and implementation plan/strategy exist for WASH in health care facilities?
k. WASH in health care facilities National policy National policy
No national Existing policy
under formally
policy status (choose one): policy under revision
development approved
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a policy exists, provide the
name of the policy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a
copy.
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY)
l. WASH in health care facilities No national Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
Plan/strategy Plan/strategy
plan/strategy status (choose approved and approved and
implementation under approved, but
being partially being fully
one): plan/strategy development not implemented
implemented implemented
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
i. If a plan/strategy exists,
provide the name of the
plan/strategy.
ii. Provide a link or attach a copy.
iii. Year approved/expected
(YYYY)
iv. Has the plan/strategy been
costed? Yes ☐ No ☐
If costed, what is the cost Currency of the Time period for cost
estimate for activities cost estimate estimate (YYYY to YYYY)
related to WASH in health
care facilities?
Between 75% and Between 95% and
Less than 50% of Between 50% and 74%
94% of what is 100% of what is
what is needed of what is needed
needed needed
v. Has the plan been supported
with adequate funding to
implement the plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
vi. Are there sufficient human
resources to implement the ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
plan?
12GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A5II. Content of WASH policies and plans/strategies: Do the WASH policies and/or plans/strategies reported in A5I address any of the following areas?
If yes, which policy(ies) or plan(s) include the measures? Select all that apply.
Urban Rural Urban Rural WASH in WASH in health
If other, provide the name
sanitation sanitation drinking-water drinking-water schools care facility Other
of policy, plan or strategy.
policy/plan policy/plan policy/plan policy/plan policy/plan policy/plan
a. Affordability measures for drinking-water ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
b. Access to safely managed drinking-water supply
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
c. Household connections for drinking-water ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
d. Drinking-water quality ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
e. Affordability measures for sanitation ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
f. Access to safely managed sanitation services
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Yes ☐ No
g. Open defecation
5
☐ Not applicable
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
h. Faecal sludge management
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Safe use of treated municipal wastewater and
i.
municipal faecal sludge
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
j. Affordability measures for hand hygiene ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
k. Hand hygiene facilities ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
l. Hand hygiene behaviour change activities ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
5
This question is not applicable if your country is open defecation free.
13GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A5II. (Continued from previous page) If yes, which policy(ies) or plan(s) include the measures? Select all that apply.
WASH in
Urban Rural Urban Rural WASH in
health care If other, provide the name
sanitation sanitation drinking-water drinking-water schools Other
facility of policy, plan or strategy:
policy/plan policy/plan policy/plan policy/plan policy/plan
policy/plan
m. Menstrual health and hygiene (e.g. menstrual
hygiene management) ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
n. Risks of climate variability and climate change to
WASH services ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
o. Climate resilience of WASH technologies and
management systems ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
p. Sustainability of WASH services (e.g. supply of
parts, human resources for operation and ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
maintenance, diversification of water sources)
q. Protections for workers (i.e. health and safety,
employment and pay, freedom of association) ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
r. Performance and efficiency of operators or
service providers (e.g. reducing nonrevenue
water, increased metering, planning for repairs /
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
replacement)
s. WASH in public places ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
t. Human resources for WASH ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Sanitation Policy Monitoring and Assessment Tool (PMAT): To support countries in their policy development processes and to improve the
monitoring of the content of national sanitation policies, plans and strategies, GLAAS has developed the sanitation Policy Monitoring and
Assessment Tool (PMAT). The PMAT is a tool that supports governments to dive deeper into their sanitation policies, plans and strategies to see
how the documents are aligned with the WHO Guidelines on Sanitation and Health.
If you would be interested to learn more about the PMAT or complete the PMAT, please contact: glaas@who.int.
14GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
WASH IN COVID-19 PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE PLANS
A6. COVID-19 preparedness and response plans: Has a COVID-19 preparedness and response plan been developed by
the government, and to what extent does it address WASH?
If yes, please provide the name of the plan.
Yes No
If available, provide a link to the plan or attach a copy.
a. Has the government developed a
COVID-19 preparedness and
response plan?
☐ ☐
If yes:
Does the COVID-19 preparedness and Yes No If yes, please describe how the topic is addressed.
response plan address the following:
i. Hand hygiene behaviour change ☐ ☐
ii. Hand hygiene facilities in health
care facilities ☐ ☐
iii. Hand hygiene facilities in public
places (i.e. markets, ☐ ☐
transportation hubs)
iv. Drinking-water ☐ ☐
v. Sanitation ☐ ☐
vi. WASH in health care facilities ☐ ☐
vii. Health care waste management ☐ ☐
viii. WASH for vulnerable populations ☐ ☐
If yes, please provide the cost estimate.
ix. If the plan addresses WASH, have Cost estimate
the WASH components of the ☐ ☐ Currency
plan been costed?
Time period of
cost estimate
Less than Between 50 and Between 95 and
x. If the plan addresses WASH, have 50% of what 74% of what is
Between 75 and 94%
100% of what is
the WASH components been of what is needed
is needed needed needed
supported by adequate funding to
implement them? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
b. Briefly describe how COVID-19 has affected national WASH plans and programming.
c. What efforts been made to strengthen hand hygiene in policies, plans and strategies as a result of COVID-19?
15GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
NATIONAL WASH TARGETS
A7I. Sanitation coverage targets National coverage target Urban coverage target Rural coverage target
a. Does your country have coverage targets for national
and/or urban and/or rural sanitation?
☐ Yes ☐No ☐ Yes ☐No ☐ Yes ☐No
If yes: Target value Target year Target value Target year Target value Target year
i. Target value / target year
ii. Specify what the coverage target measures.
iii. Title and link of policy/plan where target is
established.
b. What types of sanitation facilities are captured in the
target? Provide a description and select all that apply
below.
Toilet and containment Yes No Yes No Yes No
6
i. Use of improved sanitation facilities that are not
shared between two or more households ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
ii. Use of shared improved facilities
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
c. What aspects of service provision along the sanitation
7
service chain are captured in the target? Provide a
description and select all that apply below.
Conveyance Yes No Yes No Yes No
i. Provisions for safe networked sewerage ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
ii. Provisions for faecal sludge emptying ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Treatment
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
iii. Provisions for centralized sewage treatment
iv. Provisions for faecal sludge treatment ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
v. Provisions for excreta treatment and disposal on-site ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Disposal/end-use
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
vi. Productive use of wastewater and sludge
6
Including flush/pour flush to piped sewer system, septic tanks or pit latrines, ventilated improved pit latrines, composting toilets or pit latrines with slabs.
7
See the glossary in the Country Survey Guidance Document for the sanitation service chain.
16GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A7I. (Continued from previous page)
d. Report the baseline and most recent coverage data for National coverage target Urban coverage target Rural coverage target
the sanitation targets described above.
If data are not available, please write ‘Not available’. Value Year Value Year Value Year
i. Baseline value / baseline year
ii. Latest value / latest year of data
iii. Source of the data. If available, provide a link.
17GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A7II. Drinking-water coverage targets National coverage target Urban coverage target Rural coverage target
a. Does your country have coverage targets for ☐ Yes ☐No ☐ Yes ☐No ☐ Yes ☐No
national and/or urban and/or rural drinking-water?
If yes: Target value Target year Target value Target year Target value Target year
i. Target value / target year
ii. Specify what the coverage target measures.
iii. Title and link of policy/plan where target is
established.
b. What types of drinking-water sources are captured
in the target? Provide a description and indicate
below if improved drinking-water sources are
captured.
i. Use of improved drinking-water sources
8
☐ Yes ☐No ☐ Yes ☐No ☐ Yes ☐No
c. What aspects of service quality are captured in the
target? Provide a description and select all those that
apply below.
If yes, specify value or
Yes / No If yes, specify value or details: Yes / No Yes / No If yes, specify value or details:
details:
i. Minimum volume of water per day ☐/☐ ☐/☐ ☐/☐
ii. Minimum service hours per day / days per week ☐/☐ ☐/☐ ☐/☐
iii. Maximum roundtrip collection time, including
queuing ☐/☐ ☐/☐ ☐/☐
iv. Maximum roundtrip distance ☐/☐ ☐/☐ ☐/☐
v. Drinking-water must be accessible on premises ☐/☐ ☐/☐ ☐/☐
vi. Drinking-water must be free from faecal and
chemical contamination ☐/☐ ☐/☐ ☐/☐
8
Improved drinking water sources are those that have the potential to deliver safe water by nature of their design and construction, and include: piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, rainwater,
and packaged or delivered water.
18GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A7II. (Continued from previous page)
National coverage target Urban coverage target Rural coverage target
d. Report the baseline and most recent coverage data
for the drinking-water targets described above. Value Year Value Year Value Year
If data are not available, please write ‘Not available’.
i. Baseline value / baseline year
ii. Latest value / latest year of data
iii. Source of the data. If available, provide a link.
19GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A7III. Hand hygiene coverage targets National coverage target Urban coverage target Rural coverage target
a. Does your country have targets for national and/or urban ☐ Yes ☐No ☐ Yes ☐No ☐ Yes ☐No
and/or rural hand hygiene?
If yes: Target value Target year Target value Target year Target value Target year
i. Target value / target year
ii. Specify what the coverage target measures.
iii. Title and link of policy/plan where target is
established.
b. What types of hand hygiene facilities and requirements
are captured in the target? Provide a description and
select all that apply below.
Yes No Yes No Yes No
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
9
i. Handwashing facilities must be available on premises
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
10
ii. Soap and water must be available on premises
c. Report the baseline and most recent coverage data for
the hand hygiene target described above. Value Year Value Year Value Year
If data are not available, please indicate ‘Not available’.
i. Baseline value / baseline year
ii. Latest value / latest year of data
iii. Source of the data. If available, provide a link.
9
Handwashing facilities may be fixed or mobile including a sink with tap water, buckets with taps, tippy-taps, and jugs or basins designated for handwashing.
10
Soap includes bar soap, liquid soap, powder detergent, and soapy water. Soap does not include ash, soil, sand, or other handwashing agents.
20GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A7IV. Institutional WASH targets
Does your country have coverage targets for WASH in schools and/or health care facilities?
a. Does your country have a target for WASH in schools? ☐ Yes ☐No
If yes: Target value Target year
i. Target value / target year
ii. Specify what the coverage target measures.
iii. Title and link of policy/plan where target is established.
Report the baseline and most recent coverage data for the
WASH in schools target. If data are not available, please write Value Year
‘Not available’.
iv. Baseline value / baseline year
v. Latest value / latest year of data
vi. Source of the data. If available, provide a link.
b. Does your country have a target for WASH in health care
facilities? ☐ Yes ☐No
If yes: Target value Target year
i. Target value / target year
ii. Specify what the coverage target measures.
iii. Title and link of policy/plan where target is established.
Report the baseline and most recent coverage data for the
WASH in health care facilities target. If data are not available, Value Year
please indicate ‘Not available’.
iv. Baseline value / baseline year
v. Latest value / latest year of data
vi. Source of the data. If available, provide a link.
21GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A7V. Other WASH targets: Does your country have targets for any of the following? Report targets that have not been reported in the previous questions.
If yes:
Yes No Title and link of policy/plan where
Target value Target year Briefly describe the target and how it is defined.
target is established.
a. Affordability of drinking-water ☐ ☐
b. Affordability of sanitation ☐ ☐
c. Drinking-water quality ☐ ☐
d. Faecal sludge management ☐ ☐
e. Municipal wastewater and
sewerage ☐ ☐
f. Menstrual hygiene
management ☐ ☐
g. Health care waste
management ☐ ☐
h. WASH in public places (e.g.
markets) ☐ ☐
☐ Yes
i. Open defecation
11
☐ No
☐ Not applicable
If yes, report the baseline and most recent
Value Year
monitoring data for the open defecation target:
i. Baseline value/year
ii. Latest value/year
11
This question may be ‘not applicable’ if your country is open defecation free.
22GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
EQUITY MEASURES IN NATIONAL POLICES AND PLANS
A8I. To what extent are there measures to improve and extend services to the following settings or situations in national WASH policies and plans?
This setting/ If yes, what is the level of implementation?
Please describe the measure(s) and provide a reference and/or link to
situation does 1 – Not yet implemented
Setting/situation Yes No the relevant section of the WASH policies/plans that describe the
not exist in the 2 – Partially implemented
12 measure(s).
country 3 – Fully implemented
a. Remote or hard to
reach areas
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
☐ Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
b. Slums or informal
settlements
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
☐ Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
c. Internally
displaced persons
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
and/or refugee
camps ☐ Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
d. Emergencies and
disasters
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
☐ Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
e. Other setting or Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
situation
(please specify):
☐ Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
12
Each setting/situation that is identified as ‘This setting/situation does not exist in the country’, should be identified in the same way (by checking the box) in questions B3I and D4.
23GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A8II. To what extent are there measures to improve and extend services to the following populations in national WASH policies and plans?
If yes, what is the level of implementation?
Please describe the measure(s) and provide a reference and/or link
1 – Not yet implemented
Yes No to the relevant section of the WASH policies/plans that describe the
2 – Partially implemented
measure(s).
3 – Fully implemented
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
a. People living in poverty Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
b. Women and girls Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
People living with
c.
disabilities
Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
d. Elderly people Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
24GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A8II. (Continued from previous page)
To what extent are there measure to improve and extend services to the following populations in national WASH policies and plans?
If yes, what is the level of implementation?
This population Please describe the measure(s) and provide a reference and/or link
1 – Not yet implemented
does not exist in Yes No to the relevant section of the WASH policies/plans that describe the
the country13 2 – Partially implemented
measure(s).
3 – Fully implemented
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Indigenous
e.
populations ☐ Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Ethnic/religious
f.
minorities ☐ Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Populations
disproportionally ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
g.
affected by climate ☐ Drinking-water
change
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Other population
h.
(please specify):
Sanitation ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
☐ Drinking-water ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ 1☐ 2☐ 3☐
13
Each population that is identified as ‘This population does not exist in the country’, should be identified in the same way (by checking the box) in questions B3II and D5.
25GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
INSTITUTIONAL ROLES AND COORDINATION
A9. Institutional roles and lead agencies: Please list all government ministries or national institutions with roles in WASH and their role for each area. For each listed entity, classify their
role on a scale of 1 to 3.
1 – No role: This ministry or institution is not involved in activities in this sector.
2 – Supporting role: This ministry or institution supports the lead institution with activities to achieve common objectives in the sector.
3 – Lead role: This ministry or institution leads the governance, decision-making and planning of the sector.
List ALL ministries or national institutions involved in e. Faecal g. WASH in
a. Urban b. Rural c. Urban d. Rural f. Hand h. WASH in
WASH. Please avoid acronyms and spell out the full sludge health care
drinking-water drinking-water sanitation sanitation hygiene schools
names. management facilities
e.g. Ministry of Urban Development 3 1 3 1 1 1 3 1
26GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A10. Coordination among stakeholders
a. Does a government-led, national-level mechanism exist to Yes No
coordinate the work of different ministries, institutions, and
organizations with responsibilities for WASH? If no, proceed to ☐ ☐
question A11.
If yes:
i. What is the name of the coordination
mechanism?
ii. Which government institution/ministry or
stakeholder leads the mechanism?
iii. Which sub-sectors are covered in the ☐ Overall WASH
coordination mechanism?
Select all that apply. ☐ Sanitation
☐ Drinking-water
☐ Hand hygiene
☐ WASH in schools
WASH in health
☐ care facilities
If other, please
☐ Other
specify:
Yes No
iv. Does the mechanism include donors who
contribute to WASH activities nationally? ☐ ☐
v. Does the mechanism include
nongovernmental stakeholders (e.g.
advocacy groups, civil society ☐ ☐
organizations, NGOs)?
vi. Does the coordination process include
documentation of the process and ☐ ☐
activities?
vii. How often does the coordination ☐ Weekly
mechanism meet or convene?
Choose one. ☐ Monthly
☐ Every 3 months
☐ Every 6 months
☐ Once a year
☐ Every two years
☐ Ad hoc
viii. Please briefly describe the coordination mechanism in further detail.
27GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
COMMUNITY AND USER PARTICIPATION
14
A11. Participation procedures established at the national level: Are there clearly defined procedures in laws or policies for participation by service users (e.g. households) and
communities and what is the level of participation?
Levels of participation are defined as below:
1: None/very low – No communication: No communication between government and users/communities on policy, planning and management.
2: Low – Communication: Information on policy, planning and management is made available to users/communities.
3: Medium low – Occasional consultation: Government authorities occasionally request information, experiences and opinions of users/communities.
4: Medium high – Regular consultation: Government authorities regularly request information, experiences and opinions of users/communities.
5: High – Collaboration and accountability: Regular opportunities for users/communities to formally take part in relevant policy, planning and management processes. Processes are
documented and acted upon by the responsible entities.
6: Very high – Representation and accountability: Formal representation of users/communities in government processes contributing to joint decision-making on issues and activities, as
appropriate. Processes are documented and subject to redress if responsible entities fail to act accordingly.
If yes, does law or
Extent to which users / communities participate Extent to which women participate
Procedures defined policy specifically
15
in law or policy mention women’s Level of participation Level of participation
None / Very high None / Very high
participation? Very low
Very low
Yes No Yes No 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
a. Urban sanitation ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
b. Rural sanitation ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
c. Urban drinking-water ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
d. Rural drinking-water ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
e. Hand hygiene ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
f. Water resources planning and
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
management
i. If procedures are defined in policy or law, please provide name of the law/and or policy and further details.
ii. Please provide a description of the most common forms of user participation. If applicable, describe how government or service providers are held accountable to user/communities. For
example, by documenting joint decisions.
14
‘Participation’ means a mechanism by which individuals and communities can meaningfully contribute to decisions and directions about WASH and water resources.
15
These could be general policies or laws relating to public participation or consumer rights, or relating specifically to the WASH sector.
28GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A11. (Continued from previous page)
g. Access to opportunities for participation: What percentage of the population has access to opportunities for participation?
Participation procedures differ across settings, sectors and populations. For each sector, indicate the percentage of the population that has access to the procedures listed below.
Access entails that governments/service providers have established opportunities for the procedures to take place in communities in line with participation procedures described
above. Opportunities to participate in sanitation and drinking-water decisions are disaggregated by urban and rural populations because opportunities can differ across these
settings. Participation in water resources management decisions asks for the percentage of the total population.
Participation procedures for Participation procedures for
sanitation and drinking-water water resources management
Urban population Rural population Total population
Less Between Between Between Less Between Between Between Less Between Between Between
than 50% and 75% and 95% and than 50% and 75% and 95% and than 50% and 75% and 95% and
Percentage of the population: 50% 74% 94% 100% 50% 74% 94% 100% 50% 74% 94% 100%
i. Covered by policies and procedures for user/
community participation. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
ii. With access to information that is publicly accessible
(e.g. access to information on WASH services or
planned projects that might affect local water ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
resources).
iii. That live in areas with regular (at least twice a year)
opportunities for public engagement such as
fora/councils/meetings with service providers, local ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
government or entities responsible for each sector.
iv. With access to formal feedback systems that have
mechanisms to address user feedback, complaints and ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
concerns.
v. Covered by regulatory authorities that have
mechanisms to receive, document and resolve ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
conflicts.
29GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
A11. (Continued from previous page)
h. Government resources for public participation: To what extent are there sufficient human and financial resources to support participation of users and communities, and are
there agencies/institutions responsible for monitoring participatory procedures?
Urban Rural Water resources
sanitation and drinking- water sanitation and drinking-water planning and management
Between Between Between
Less than Between 50 Between 75 Less than Between 50 Between 75 Less than Between 50 Between 75
95% and 95% and 95% and
50% of and 74% of and 94% of 50% of and 74% of and 94% of 50% of and 74% of and 94% of
100% of 100% of 100% of
what is what is what is what is what is what is what is what is what is
what is what is what is
needed needed needed needed needed needed needed needed needed
needed needed needed
i. Are there sufficient
financial resources in
place to support ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
participation of users and
communities?
ii. Are there sufficient
human resources to
support participation of ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
users and communities?
iii. Are there agencies/
If yes, what is the name of the If yes, what is the name of the If yes, what is the name of the
institutions responsible
agency/institution? agency/institution? agency/institution?
for monitoring the extent
of and effectiveness of
participatory
Yes ☐ Yes ☐ Yes ☐
procedures? No ☐ No ☐ No ☐
30GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
Section B: Monitoring
Responses to this section of the survey will help to determine the level of monitoring activity performed by the government, as
well as other stakeholders and how this information is used in the planning, development and evaluation of water and sanitation
services. Please consult the survey guidance for important information on the questions in Section B.
WASH JOINT SECTOR REVIEWS
B1. WASH joint sector reviews (JSRs): A joint sector review is a government-led periodic process that brings different
stakeholders in a particular sector together to engage in dialogue, review status, progress and performance, and take
decisions on priority actions. Alternative names for joint sector reviews include: Annual Water Sector Conference, Joint
Water Sector Review, Multi-Stakeholder Forum, Joint Annual Review, and WASH Conference. Partner-led or partner-
initiated assessments such as WASH bottleneck analyses using the WASH Bottleneck Analysis Tool (BAT), GLAAS and JMP
coverage estimates do not constitute a joint sector review process.
Yes No
a. Does the government conduct joint
sector reviews? If no, proceed to
question B2. ☐ ☐
If yes:
i. What is the JSR called?
ii. Which year did the most recent JSR
take place (YYYY)?
iii. Which government
ministry/institution leads the JSR?
Yes No
iv. Is the Ministry of Health involved in
JSRs? ☐ ☐
v. Is the Ministry of Finance involved in
JSRs? ☐ ☐
Annually Every two years Every 2+ years On an ad hoc basis
vi. How often are JSRs conducted?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
vii. Are the following themes / sectors covered in JSRs?
Yes No
Sanitation ☐ ☐
Drinking-water ☐ ☐
Hand hygiene ☐ ☐
WASH in health care facilities ☐ ☐
WASH in schools ☐ ☐
Gender ☐ ☐
Menstrual health and hygiene ☐ ☐
Vulnerable populations ☐ ☐
Other ☐ ☐
If other, please specify:
31GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
B1. (Continued from previous page)
viii. Of the government agencies invited to Between 50 Between 75 Between 95%
Less than 50%
and 74% and 94% and 100%
participate in the most recent JSR, what
percentage participated? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Yes No
ix. Were development partners (donors, multilateral
agencies, NGOs) invited to participate in the most
recent JSR? ☐ ☐
Between 50 Between 75 Between 95%
1. If yes, of the development partners invited to Less than 50%
and 74% and 94% and 100%
participate, what percentage participated?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
x. Were priority actions (commitments, declaration Yes No Not applicable
points, priority measures, key actions,
recommendations, recommended priority
actions, undertakings, urgent recommendations) ☐ ☐ ☐
from the previous JSR reviewed during the most
recent JSR?
Yes No
xi. Are priority actions set by the review process?
☐ ☐
Yes No
xii. Is progress towards national targets validated
and reviewed during the review process? ☐ ☐
b. Impacts of sector review: Did the most recent JSR lead to substantial changes in the following areas? If yes, please describe.
Yes No Description
i. Legislation ☐ ☐
ii. Policy ☐ ☐
iii. Planning ☐ ☐
iv. Targets ☐ ☐
v. Human resources ☐ ☐
vi. Institutional
arrangements ☐ ☐
vii. Monitoring ☐ ☐
viii. Financial ☐ ☐
ix. Other ☐ ☐
32GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
USE OF MONITORING DATA
B2. Data use for decision-making: To what extent are WASH data used for each of the following areas of decision-making? Choose one box per row.
Data used for Data used for
Data not Data If data are used, provide an example or explain how the data
a minority of a majority of
available not used contribute to decision-making.
decisions decisions
Decisions on sanitation
a. Planning processes and/or sector reviews ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
b. Allocating resources ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
c. Developing of national standards or regulations ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
d. Targeting surveillance activities ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Decisions on drinking-water
e. Planning processes and/or sector reviews ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
f. Allocating resources ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
g. Developing or revising of national standards or ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
regulations
h. Targeting surveillance activities ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Decisions on hand hygiene
i. Planning processes and/or sector reviews ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
j. Resource allocation ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
k. Developing behaviour change improvement initiatives ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Decisions on health
l. Responding to disease outbreaks ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
m. Identifying public health priorities for reducing WASH-
related diseases ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
n. Identifying priority health care facilities needing WASH
improvements ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
33GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
B2. (Continued from previous page)
o. Please describe any barriers to using data for decision-making.
MONITORING EQUITY MEASURES
B3I. Tracking progress in different settings/situations: Is progress in improving and extending services specifically in the
following settings/situations tracked and reported?
This setting/situation Sanitation Drinking-water Hand hygiene
does not exist in the
country16 Yes No Yes No Yes No
a. Remote or hard to reach areas ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
b. Slums or informal settlements ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
c. Internally displaced persons and/or refugee camps
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
d. Emergencies and disasters
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
e. Other setting / situation (please specify):
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
f. If yes to any of the above, please specify how service provision to the situations/settings is being tracked and reported.
g. Please provide a reference and/or link to the relevant section of the WASH policies/plans that describe the
measures above.
16
Settings/situation checked as ‘This setting/situation does not exist in the country’ should align with responses to question A8I.
34GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
B3II. Tracking progress among vulnerable groups: Is progress in improving and extending services specifically to the
following populations tracked and reported?
This
population
Sanitation Drinking-water Hand hygiene
does not
17
exist Yes No Yes No Yes No
a. People living in poverty ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
b. Women and girls ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
c. People living with disabilities ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
d. Elderly populations ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
e. Indigenous populations ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
f. Ethnic / religious minorities ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Populations disproportionally affected by climate
g.
change ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
h. Other population (please specify):
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
If yes to any of the above, please specify how service provision to the populations is being tracked and
i.
reported.
Please provide a reference and/or link to the relevant section of the WASH policies/plans that describe the
j.
measures above.
17
Populations checked as ‘This population does not exist in the country’ should align with responses to question A8II.
35GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
B4. Use of performance indicators to track progress: To what extent are there performance indicators that are used in the
following categories?
Performance indicators are:
Being Agreed,
Agreed and
developed or tracked Please list the main indicator(s):
No such baseline
a. Sanitation agreed but against
indicators data
not yet established
established
implemented baseline data
i. Government expenditure (e.g.
ratio spent/allocated, proportion ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
of budget released mid-term)
ii. Treated effluent and faecal
sludge quality (e.g. quality against
national standards/permits and/or
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
suited to disposal/reuse)
iii. Quality of service (e.g.
frequency of emptying septic
tanks, response time to
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
complaints)
iv. Equitable service coverage (e.g.
per cent (%) of populations in
different locations, and different
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
economic groups, with access)
v. Cost efficiency (e.g. cost for
levels of service such as latrines,
networked sewage system, ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
operations and maintenance
(O&M) spent)
vi. Functionality of systems (e.g.
working/non-working
infrastructure, asset management ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
indicators)
b. Drinking-water
i. Government expenditure (e.g.
ratio spent/allocated, proportion ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
of budget released mid-term)
ii. Water quality (e.g. per cent (%)
compliance for E. coli or chlorine ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
residual)
iii. Quality of service delivery (e.g.
hours of service, minimum water
pressure, seasonable variability in
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
delivery, average repair times)
iv. Equitable service coverage (e.g.
per cent (%) of populations in
different locations, and different
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
economic groups, with access)
v. Cost efficiency (e.g. costs for
levels of service: e.g. networked
systems, boreholes, O&M per m3,
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
bill collection ratio)
vi. Functionality of systems (e.g.
working/non-working
infrastructure, asset management
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
indicators)
36GLAAS 2021/2022 country survey
B4. (Continued from previous page)
c. Monitored indicators: If the following indicators are measured, please indicate approximate value(s). If the indicators are
not measured, please write ‘Not monitored’.
i. Please estimate the national percentage of urban
wastewater that is treated (either through a centralized
or decentralized system):
ii. Please estimate the national percentage of rural
wastewater that is treated (either through decentralized
or on-site treatment):
iii. Please provide the average nonrevenue water for the
three largest water suppliers: (‘Nonrevenue water’ is not
the same as ‘unaccounted for water’. Please review
definitions in the glossary before responding.)
d. Please describe additional specific examples of performance indicators or performance indicator system(s) that are used.
37You can also read
