THE FUTURE OF TAX PLANNING AND WEALTH MANAGEMENT: TRANSPARENCY AND SUBSTANCE FOR ALL? - 8.30AM - 12.00PM
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
THE FUTURE OF TAX PLANNING AND WEALTH MANAGEMENT: TRANSPARENCY AND SUBSTANCE FOR ALL? Thursday, 16 March 2017 8.30AM – 12.00PM Sasana Kijang, Conference Hall 1
THE DRIVE TO TRANSPARENCY: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF INTERNATIONAL TAX PLANNING by Chee Pei Pei, Partner, Financial Services & Insurance Leader – Tax, Deloitte Malaysia Tan Hooi Beng, Partner, Corporate Tax/International Tax, Deloitte Malaysia
Common Reporting Standard (CRS) on Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) Are you ready? Chee Pei Pei Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Automatic Exchange of Information How does it works? Controlling Person(s) Exchange of information Entity Account Holders Domestic tax authorities Foreign tax authorities in countries of Account Holders and Controlling Reporting Persons Due Diligence Reporting Financial Institutions • FIs to review &identify reportable accounts (based on tax residency of account holders/ Individual Account controlling parties) Holders • FIs to report on reportable accounts to the domestic tax authority • Domestic tax authority will share information with foreign tax authorities 8 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Automatic Exchange of Information Signatories of Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement Signed (53) Anguilla Faroe Islands Latvia Seychelles Argentina Finland Liechtenstein Slovak Republic Barbados France Lithuania Slovenia Belgium Germany Luxembourg South Africa Bermuda Gibraltar Malta South Korea Committed (1) British Virgin Islands Greece Mexico Spain Bulgaria Greenland Montserrat Sweden 2017 Trinidad & Tobago Cayman Islands Guernsey Netherlands Turks & Caicos Colombia Hungary Niue United Kingdom Croatia Iceland Norway Curacao India Poland Cyprus Ireland Portugal Czech Republic Isle of Man Romania Denmark Italy San Marino Estonia Jersey Signed (34) Committed (13) Albania Chile Japan Saint Lucia Andorra China Kuwait Saint Vincent & Grenadines Bahamas Panama Antigua & Barbuda Cook Islands Malaysia Samoa Bahrain Qatar Aruba Costa Rica Marshall Islands Saudi Arabia Brunei Darussalam Singapore Australia El Salvador * Mauritius Sint Maarten Dominica Turkey 2018 Austria Grenada Monaco Switzerland Hong Kong (China) UAE Brazil Ghana Nauru Uruguay Lebanon Vanuatu Belize Indonesia New Zealand Macau (China) Canada Israel Russia *announcement of signing made – date not released. © 2015 Deloitte & Touche LLP 9 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
CRS Implementation Development in Malaysia List of specific low risk Due diligence Introduced new Malaysia has accounts as and collection Section 132B signed the Excluded of CRS via Finance Act MCAA in Jan Accounts to information 2014 2016 be gazette by will start on 1 June 2017 July 2017 2014/2015 2016 2017 2018 Penalty for non-compliance was IRB met up Reportable First announced in the Budget 2017 with FIs to jurisdiction reporting - Gazetted via Finance Act 2017 share list will be is due on updates on issued by 30 June 15 Feb the IRB by 2018 Income Tax Rules and Orders on 2017 15 Jan AEoI were released on 23 Dec 2018 2016 10 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
CRS in Malaysia Recent Updates • Income Tax (Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters) Order 2016 - Gazette on 23 December 2016 - To legalise the fact that the Government of Malaysia has signed MAA to foster all forms of administrative assistance in matters concerning taxes of any kind. - One of the form of the “administrative assistance” is exchange of information. • Income Tax (Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on Automatic Exchange of Financial Information) Order 2016 - Gazette on 23 December 2016 - To formalise that the Government of Malaysia has signed MCAA with a view of exchanging information that is foreseeably relevant in relation to taxation. - Over 99 countries have signed on the MCAA. - Reportable jurisdiction list will be issued by the IRB by 15 January 2018. • Income Tax (Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information) Rules 2016 –. - Gazette on 23 December 2016 - Every Reporting FI shall identify Reportable Account by applying due diligence procedures specified in the CRS. - “16 Options” addressed. - Go-Live 1 July 2017 • Labuan Business Activity Tax (Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information) Regulations 2017 – Pending public release. • Guidance Notes on CRS - Will there be one? • Reportable jurisdiction list – by 15 January 2018 11 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Automatic Exchange of Information Who reports – reporting financial institutions The scope of financial institutions subject to CRS is broad - Reporting Financial Institutions Depository institutions Entities that accept deposits in the ordinary course (e.g. Commercial banks) of a banking or similar business Custodial institutions Entities that hold financial assets for the account of (e.g. Nominee companies) others Investment entities Entities (i) whose primary business involves certain (e.g. Investment banks, asset asset management or financial services for or on managers, unit trusts) behalf of a customer or (ii) whose gross income is primarily attributable to investing, reinvesting or trading in financial assets, if the entity is managed by another financial institution Specified insurance companies Insurance companies that issue or are obligated to (life insurers) make payments for cash value insurance contracts or annuity contracts 12 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Automatic Exchange of Information Who is reported – reportable accounts Reportable Accounts Accounts held by Reportable Persons Reportable Persons • A tax resident individual or entity in a reportable jurisdiction. Passive NFE (non-financial entity) • any NFE that is not an Active NFE • more than 50% passive income & more than 50% assets producing passive income - dividends, interest, rents royalties) Accounts held by a Passive NFE with Controlling Persons that are Reportable Persons Controlling Persons • Natural person who exercises control (25%) over an entity • In case of a trust, Controlling Persons means the settlor, protector, beneficiary(ies). Similar application for legal persons functionally similar to trusts (e.g. foundations) 13 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Automatic Exchange of Information What is required from you? Type of account What is required Individual accounts • Declaration of tax resident status via a which includes self certification form controlling person of a passive NFE • Required to state reason if you do not have a tax identification number. • Be prepared to be questioned by the FI relationship managers especially if your account with the FI exceeds USD1m. • Monitor for any changes in tax residents – You may be a tax resident of Malaysia last year but can be a tax resident of another country this year. 14 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Automatic Exchange of Information What is reported - information to be reported Information required to be reported in relation to individual and entity account holders and controlling persons Identification Account information Financial information information • Name • Account number • Account balance or value • Address • Name and identifying • Interest, dividends and other • Jurisdiction of number of the FI income generated with respect residence to the assets held in the • TIN account • Date of birth • Proceeds from the sale / • Place of birth redemption of financial assets paid or credited to the account 15 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Automatic Exchange of Information When is it reported - timeline 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 New Jan 1, 2016 █ accounts 2017 adopters Review high value preexisting December 31, Note:- individual accounts 2016 █ If account was First automatic exchange of information between September, 2017 closed during jurisdictions █ the year, the account balance Review preexisting low value individual accounts Dec 31, 2017 █ or value prior to Review preexisting entity accounts Dec 31, 2017 █ closure. New accounts Jan 1, 2017 █ 2018 adopters Review high value preexisting individual accounts Dec 31, 2017 █ First automatic exchange of information between jurisdictions Sept 30, 2018 █ Review preexisting low value individual accounts Dec 31, 2018 █ Review preexisting entity accounts Dec 31, 2018 █ New accounts July 1, 2017 █ Review high value preexisting individual accounts June 30, 2018 █ Malaysia First reporting to Inland Revenue Board June 30, 2018 █ First automatic exchange of information between jurisdictions Sept 30, 2018 █ Review preexisting low value individual accounts June 30, 2019 █ Review preexisting entity accounts June 30, 2019 █ 16 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
CRS: How it impacts you? 17 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Implications on Malaysian HNWI Overview 1 The AEoI will lead to full disclosure of offshore financial assets AEoI may lead to an increased number 2 of tax audits and the IRB will have access to the information on financial assets kept outside Malaysia. 3 Prepare defense for potential audit. 18 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Implications on Malaysian HNWI Potential Questions from IRB From income or capital? E.g. loans and advances. Where did the funds Sources within Malaysia or from come from? outside Malaysia? Income reported to tax in Malaysia or unreported? Provide supporting documents/evidence - bank statements, saving pass books, cheque butt, credit card statements, sale and purchase agreements, loan agreements etc. 19 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Implications of CRS Example 1: HNWI with offshore financial assets Funds/Monies • Income in Malaysia • Bank loans • Advances from company • Unreported income – self or company Wire transfer USD1m to Australia Malaysia Australia 2017: 2010: 2013: USD50m Placement Trading in balance in in fixed shares bank deposits account 2012: Buy real property 20 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Implications of CRS Example 2: Simple trust structure in Malaysia Trustee MY tax resident Malaysian Trust FD Placements Individual A Individual B Settlor Beneficiary MY tax resident MY tax resident Bank XYZ Question: Which are the Switzerland reportable accounts that will be reported to the IRB by the Swiss tax authorities? 21 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Implications of CRS Example 3: Simple trust structure offshore Trustee Individual C BVI tax resident Beneficiary MY tax resident BVI Trust Individual A FD Placements Settlor MY tax resident Entity B Beneficiary MY tax resident Passive NFE (non- Bank ABC financial entity) Question: Malaysia Individual B 1. Who is responsible to • any NFE that is not 50% shareholding an Active NFE UK tax resident report to IRB? • more than 50% 2. Who will be reported to passive income & IRB? more than 50% assets producing passive income - dividends, interest, 22 rents royalties) © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/my/about for a more detailed description of DTTL and its member firms. Deloitte provides audit, consulting, financial advisory, risk management, tax and related services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. With a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries, Deloitte brings world-class capabilities and high-quality service to clients, delivering the insights they need to address their most complex business challenges. Deloitte’s more than 225,000 professionals are committed to making an impact that matters. Deloitte serves 4 out of 5 Fortune Global 500® companies. About Deloitte Southeast Asia Deloitte Southeast Asia Ltd – a member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited comprising Deloitte practices operating in Brunei, Cambodia, Guam, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam – was established to deliver measurable value to the particular demands of increasingly intra-regional and fast growing companies and enterprises. Comprising 270 partners and over 7,300 professionals in 25 office locations, the subsidiaries and affiliates of Deloitte Southeast Asia Ltd combine their technical expertise and deep industry knowledge to deliver consistent high quality services to companies in the region. All services are provided through the individual country practices, their subsidiaries and affiliates which are separate and independent legal entities. About Deloitte in Malaysia In Malaysia, services are provided by Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd and its affiliates. This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte network”) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. No entity in the Deloitte network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this communication. © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Headline The DriveVerdana Bold to Transparency: The Changing Landscape of International Tax Planning Tan Hooi Beng
Substance and Transparency © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Case Study (Trading in Jinjang) 26 26 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Case Study Ah Beng Sdn Bhd −Shareholders are Malaysian individuals −Trading of cosmetics −Import from Italy, France and China, export to India, Vietnam and US (sells to distributors there) −Also sells to Malaysian market (sells to local distributors) −The personnel/director handling the purchase/sales transactions are based in Jinjang’s sales office −Sales orders from customers are received and confirmed in Malaysia −Negotiations re purchase/sales mainly in Malaysia via phone/emails −Sales proceed received in Malaysia −Goods do not physically enter Malaysia (except for those sold to Malaysian customers) ISSUE: ARE THE TRADING PROFITS SUBJECT TO MALAYSIAN CORPORATE TAX? IF YES, WHY? IF NO, WHY? 27 27 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd 27
Case Study (Cont’d) 1##: Ah Beng, I have a brilliant tax planning idea. Why don’t you incorporate a company in the BVI. The 2##: Wow, that sounds to good to be modus operandi of the trading true. Are you sure that this tax planning of cosmetics can remained unchanged, i.e. all your idea will work? I don’t want to be in the buy/sell activities can continue hot soup though….. in Jinjang. But, the profits now will be booked in the BVI Co. Overall, there is no tax as Insert BVI is a tax-free country. Ah Beng the client Joe the tax agent 28 28 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Case Study (Cont’d) ISSUE: IS THE TAX PLANNING IDEA WORKABLE ? 29 29 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
BVI = International Offshore Financial Centres (IOFC)? 30 30 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
31 31 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
International Trading Company Foreign Supplier Foreign s Customers Malaysian Trading Co Sale Sale# #1 CIT 2 24% Foreign Foreign Suppliers Customers Sale# International Trading Co Sale# 1 2 • Suitable location – LABUAN IBFC?? • Economic substance • Negotiation/conclusion of contract • Permanent establishment risk 32 • Anti-avoidance rules 32 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Labuan Global Trading Company • Economic substance • Office, facilities, assets • Personnel • Location of top management • Bank account • Negotiates contract • Concludes contract • Purchasing order confirmation • Sales order confirmation • Invoicing Supplier of • Sales proceeds perfumes (e.g. • No buy/sell dealings with Malaysian residents USA, China, Japan etc) Sell Labuan Global Sell Pay Trading Buyer/ Company Customer Pay (e.g. in India, Europe etc) Physical flow 33 33 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
BEPS Action 6: Preventing the granting of treaty benefits in inappropriate circumstances: The end of treaty shopping? © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
What led to Action 6 Treaty shopping - lowering withholding taxes (WHT) payable Example 1 - Indofood’s case Loan SPV Mauritius 0% WHT on interest Netherlands 100% SPV BV CO Loan Loan Mauritius Interest WHT @ Interest WHT @ Indonesia 20% 100% 10% 100% Indonesia IND CO IND CO 35 35 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
What led to Action 6 (Cont’d) Treaty shopping - lowering withholding taxes (WHT) payable Example 2 MY CO Dividend WHT @ Malaysia 0% MY CO Country Y 100% Malaysia Dividend 100% Country X Withholding tax Y CO (“WHT”) @ 30% X CO Dividend WHT @ Country X 100% 10% X CO 36 36 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
What led to Action 6 (Cont’d) Treaty shopping – transactions that circumvent the application of the treaty rule that allows source taxation on disposal of shares Example – before the amendment of the India-Mauritius tax treaty** MY CO Disposal of shares Malaysia in MU Co - no Mauritius 100% CGT in MY; no CGT in Mauritius MY CO Disposal of MU CO unquoted shares Disposal of shares in Malaysia in IN Co held for India IN Co - will only be 100% long term – 100% India taxable in Mauritius subject to 10% (the country of capital gains tax residency); no CGT in IN CO (CGT) in India, no IN CO Mauritius CGT in Malaysia • **Note: India has renegotiated with Mauritius and as a result of the re-negotiation, India gets taxing rights on capital gain income arising on shares of an Indian company acquired on or after April 1, 2017 (with concession on share investments made up to March 31, 2017) 37 37 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Economic Substance “Treaty shopping” generally refers to arrangements through which a person who is not a resident of one of the two States that concluded a tax treaty may attempt to obtain benefits that the treaty grants to residents of these States. These strategies are often implemented by establishing companies in States with desirable tax treaties that are often qualified as “letterboxes” “shell companies” or “conduits” because these companies exist on paper but have no or hardly any substance in reality. 38 38 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Economic Substance • Examples of steps to build substance The establishment of the company or the arrangement of the transaction structure / scheme is not aimed solely at utilizing the double taxation agreement (board resolutions etc could provide an indication) The company’s business activities are managed by its own management which has sufficient authority to perform transactions The company must have its own employees, management team and own set of board of directors. The company has an active business or activities (issue: what constitute active business for holding company?) Company to incur relevant costs such as payroll cost, rental etc Proper and adequate capitalization (share capital) Board meetings to be held in the country To maintain bank accounts in the country To ensure that books/records are properly kept in the country 39 39 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
What’s next? • Treaty shopping will become very difficult as anti-treaty shopping conditions will be added to treaties: −Principal purpose test (PPT) −Limitation on benefits (LOB) • Proper economic substance in the holding companies? • Special purpose companies in treaty locations will generally not qualify for treaty benefits −Should group structures be flattened? • Any offshore claims by companies within the group? 40 40 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Contact Details Tan Hooi Beng Partner, Business Tax and International Tax Tel: +603 7610 8843 Mobile: +6017 333 0891 Email: hooitan@deloitte.com 41 © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. Please see http://www.deloitte.com/my/about for a more detailed description of DTTL and its member firms. Deloitte provides audit, consulting, financial advisory, risk management, tax and related services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. With a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries, Deloitte brings world-class capabilities and high-quality service to clients, delivering the insights they need to address their most complex business challenges. Deloitte’s more than 225,000 professionals are committed to making an impact that matters. Deloitte serves 4 out of 5 Fortune Global 500® companies. This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte network”) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. No entity in the Deloitte network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this communication. About Deloitte in Malaysia In Malaysia, services are provided by Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd and its affiliates. © 2017 Deloitte Tax Services Sdn Bhd
PRIVATE WEALTH MANAGEMENT BEYOND LEGAL TRADITIONS AND CONVENTIONS by Millie Chan Senior Consultant, Asia Pacific Markets Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
1. Wealth and Estate Planning: Key Concerns 1.1 Asset protection and preservation: Adverse claims. Claims arising from marital breakdown. Country and political risks. Imposition of exchange control. Expropriation and nationalization. 44
1. Wealth and Estate Planning: Key Concerns 1.1 Asset protection and preservation (cont’d): Spendthrift beneficiaries. Beneficiaries with special needs. 1.2 Tax minimization: In home country. Beneficiaries in taxing jurisdictions (e.g. USA, Canada, Australia, U.K.). 45
1. Wealth and Estate Planning: Key Concerns 1.3 Preservation of family wealth: Transition of wealth: Division of family wealth among family members of the next generation Stewardship of family wealth for succeeding generations. 46
1. Wealth and Estate Planning: Key Concerns 1.4 Family business: Avoiding fragmentation of ownership. Encouraging participation in management by succeeding generations. Solution: Asset Protection Structure 47
1. Wealth and Estate Planning: Key Concerns 1.5 Preservation of family as a whole: Legacy of family’s “intangible assets”: Family identity. Family vision. Family values and tradition, etc. Solution: Family Governance Structure 48
2. Commonly Found Components of an Estate Plan 2.1 In our experience, existing estate plans are generally incomplete and may not address key concerns, such as: Planning is often domestic, not global. Transfer of assets is often direct (by gifts or wills), not indirect (through protective structures). Focus is on who will own assets, not on how the assets can be used to benefit the family across generations. Assets often receive more attention than heirs. 49
3. An Estate with No Plan Real Estate Real Assets Estate Company Business Operating Founder Assets Company Financial Investment Founder Assets Company Family 50
4. Asset Protection Structure Real Estate Real Assets Estate Company Founder Asset Business Operating Holding Protection Assets Company Company Entity Founder Family Financial Investmen Assets t Company 51
5. Choices of Structures 5.1 There are various options for choice of structure, such as: The common law trust. The civil law concept of foundation. A structure involving private trust company. 52
6. Common Law Trust 6.1 Concept of Trust Classic doctrine of common law jurisdiction. A Trust is a legal relationship between Settlor, Trustee and Beneficiary. Created when Settlor transfers property to Trustee to be managed for benefit of Beneficiary. A Trust is not an autonomous juridical person and is represented by Trustee. 53
6. Common Law Trust 6.1 Concept of Trust (cont’d): Trust involves a split in legal and beneficial ownership of trust property. Trustee (legal owner) has the right to deal with trust property but has an equitable obligation to deal with it for the benefit of Beneficiary (beneficial owner). With split ownership, trust property is not available to creditors of Trustee. Terms of a Trust are usually contained in a trust instrument which is kept confidential. 54
6. Common Law Trust 6.2 Parties in a Trust: Settlor Settles the trust by transferring property to Trustee. Trustee Legal owner of trust property but is legally obliged to manage trust property for benefit of Beneficiary – the duty of loyalty. Beneficiary Beneficiary has equitable or beneficial entitlement to trust property which enforceable by law. 55
7. Common Law Trust Structure – Real Life Example Trustee Common Discretionary Beneficiaries – may include Settlor Law Trust Settlor Represented Protector by Trustee Advisory Committee Holding Company Midshore/ Offshore Onshore Real Estate Operating Investmen Company Company t Company 56
8. Labuan Trusts 8.1 Labuan Trusts Act 1996: provides for creation and recognition of Labuan Trusts. 8.2 Special features include: Trustee must be a Labuan trust company. Trust property may include Malaysian property with the approval from Labuan Financial Services Authority. Must be created by will or other instrument in writing. Express recognition of reserved powers trust. 57
8. Labuan Trusts 8.2 Special features (cont’d): Registration of Labuan Trust is optional. Duration of Labuan Trust: limited or perpetual. Unenforceability of foreign claim or judgment. Statutory provision for secrecy and proceedings in camera. Redomiciliation of foreign trust. Migration of Labuan Trust. 58
9. Civil Law Concept of Foundation 9.1 Concept of a Foundation: Originated from civil law jurisdiction. Foundation is established through a process of registration with requisite documents. Foundation is a juridical person. Foundation is both the legal and beneficial owner of its property. 59
9. Civil Law Concept of Foundation 9.1 Concept of a Foundation (cont’d): Foundation has no shareholders or members: Foundation and its property are managed by a council/officers in line with Foundation’s charter, articles and applicable law. Foundation may be established for a specific purpose and to provide for beneficiaries. Foundation bears characteristics of both a company and a trust – sometimes referred to as an “incorporated trust”. 60
10. Civil Law Concept of Foundation – Real Life Example Founder Founder’s rights Purpose: To advance interests of the family Directors/ Beneficiaries in the discretion of the Founder Council Foundation Protector Members Advisory Committee Holding Company Midshore/ Offshore Onshore Real Operating Investmen Estate Company t Company Company 61
11. Labuan Foundations 11.1 Labuan Foundations Act 2010 (“LFA”): provides for establishment, regulation and dissolution of Labuan Foundations. 11.2 Constituent documents: Charter registered as a public document and contains information such as Foundation’s name, objects, duration. Articles: a private document that outlines the way Foundation should be managed and administered including identification of beneficiaries, distribution of property to beneficiaries. 62
11. Labuan Foundations 11.3 Parties in a Labuan Foundation: Founder Founder establishes Foundation and transfers initial assets to Foundation. Property of Foundation may include Malaysian property with approval from Labuan Financial Services Authority or unless Foundation is for charitable purposes. Founder may reserve rights and powers and may transfer such rights or powers. 63
11. Labuan Foundations 11.3 Parties in a Labuan Foundation (cont’d): Officers It is mandatory to have at least one Officer, initially appointed by Founder. Founder or Beneficiary who is not a Council Member may be an Officer. Officers are to administer the Foundation to achieve its purposes or objects. 64
11. Labuan Foundations 11.3 Parties in a Labuan Foundation (cont’d): Secretary It is mandatory to have a Secretary. Secretary must be a Labuan trust company. Beneficiary The party who may receive distributions from the Foundation as determined by Founder. Beneficiary has no equitable or beneficial entitlement to the property of the Foundation. 65
11. Labuan Foundations 11.3 Parties in a Labuan Foundation (cont’d): Council and Council Members Appointment of Council is optional. If there is a Council, the Council represents Foundation. Council Members are initially appointed by Founder. In some jurisdictions (not for Labuan), a member of the Council must be a person with specified qualifications. Council ensures compliance by Foundation and its Officers with terms of constituent documents and the Act and responsible for its general supervision. 66
11. Labuan Foundations 11.3 Parties in a Labuan Foundation (cont’d): Supervisory Person A Supervisory Person may be appointed to have supervisory powers over Foundation in addition to or in lieu of the Council. 67
11. Labuan Foundations 11.4 Special provisions include: Duration of Foundation: limited or perpetual existence. Unenforceability of foreign claim or judgment. Statutory provision for secrecy and proceedings in camera. Redomiciliation of foreign foundation. Migration of Labuan Foundation. 68
12. Uses of Trusts and Foundations 12.1 Both trusts and foundations are viable alternatives for achieving financial and estate objectives. Asset protection. Asset preservation. Succession planning. Confidentiality. Consideration of tax efficiency. Avoidance of forced heirship. 69
13. Example of Estate Plan: Status Quo Labuan Labuan Hong Kong Singapore Malaysia Family Holdco 100% Sibling #1 Sibling #2 Sibling #3 Sibling #4 70
14. Example of Estate Plan: New Structure Sibling #1 Sibling #2 Sibling #4 Sub- Family Family Sibling #3 Family Structures Foundation Foundation Family Trust Foundation Beneficiaries Main Labuan Main Structure Foundation Labuan Holdco Labuan Labuan Family Holdco Sibling #1 Sibling #2 Sibling #3 Sibling #4 71
15. Example of Estate Plan: Optional Distribution Trust Beneficiaries: All members of the four branches of the Distribution Family Trust Beneficiary Sibling #1 Sibling #2 Sibling #4 Sub- Family Family Sibling #3 Family Structures Foundation Foundation Family Foundation Trust Beneficiaries Main Labuan Main Structure Foundation Labuan Holdco Labuan Labuan Malaysia Malaysia Family Holdco 72
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Contact Information Millie Chan Wai Yen, Lawyer, Senior Consultant, Asia Pacific Markets Direct Tel: + 1.604.632.3411 Direct Fax: +1.604.662.5324 Email: mchan@blg.com Vancouver Office: 1200 Waterfront Centre 200 Burrard Street P.O. Box 48600 Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V7X 1T2 Website: www.blg.com 73
PANEL DISCUSSION The Future of Tax Planning and Wealth Management: Transparency and Substance for All? Moderator: Hiu Chee Fatt, Director, Business Development, Labuan IBFC Inc. Panelists: Chee Pei Pei, Partner, Financial Services & Insurance Leader – Tax, Deloitte Malaysia Millie Chan, Senior Consultant, Asia Pacific Markets, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Khairudin Abdul Rahman, Chairman, Association of Labuan Banks Tan Hooi Beng, Partner, Corporate Tax / International Tax, Deloitte Malaysia
SASANA KIJANG KUALA LUMPUR 16 – 17 AUGUST 2017 (1.5 Days) EARLY BIRD SPECIAL AT RM 200 BY 31 MAY 2017 FOR MORE INFO: acc@libfc.com
Thank You
Disclaimer This presentation should not be regarded as offering a complete explanation of the matters referred to and is subject to changes in law. It is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Labuan IBFC cannot accept any responsibility for loss occasional to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this presentation. The republication, reproduction or commercial use of any part of this presentation in any manner whatsoever, including electronically, without the prior written permission from Labuan IBFC Inc. is strictly prohibited. LABUAN IBFC INC SDN BHD IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY ESTABLISHED BY GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA TO POSITION LABUAN IBFC AS THE PREFERRED INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL CENTRE IN ASIA PACIFIC
You can also read