The European Innovation Partnership (EIP) "Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability" - Speeding up innovation - EUFRAS
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The European Innovation Partnership (EIP) „Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability“ Speeding up innovation EUFRAS conference – Warsaw – 21 February 2018 Inge Van Oost - DG Agriculture and Rural Development Health and Consumers
Triple Systems The EIP-AGRI in short approach • 2010: European Innovation Partnerships want to speed up innovation through collaboration and linking policies and instruments: IMPACT!!! • The EIP-AGRI was launched by DG AGRI in 2012: COM (2012)79 • The EIP-AGRI applies an overarching "Open innovation" concept based on the interactive innovation model (applied in CAP Operational Groups and H2020 Multi-Actor projects): Collaboration between various actors to make best use of complementary types of knowledge (scientific, practical, organisational, etc) in view of co-creation and diffusion of solutions/opportunities ready to implement in practice. • EU wide EIP network linking actors: communication, partnering, dissemination, knowledge flows and collecting practice needs (Open science) * In line with the main recommendation of the 2015 Milan Scientific Committee on impact: 'more research into practice'
"I not only use all the brains that I have, but all that I can borrow" Woodrow Wilson – President of the USA, 1913-1921
Funding for interactive innovation projects Rural Development Horizon 2020 (regional/national level) (European projects) • Funding for setting up of • Research projects, an “Operational Group“ to provide the (OG) : farmers, advisors, knowledge base for agribusiness, innovative actions researchers, NGOs, etc) planning an innovation • Interactive eip-agri innovation formats: project (Art 35) multi-actor • Project funding for the projects and Operational Group’s EIP networks thematic networks project (Art 35). MS/regions genuinely involving farmers, advisors, • Supporting innovation entreprises, etc…. support services Unique EU "all along the repository of project" contacts and practice Involvement of OGs is abstracts Health and Consumers strongly recommended
EU added value : An EU wide EIP network, supported under Rural development NRN policy Linking with H2020 Multi-actor National Rural project (MA) NRN Network (NRN) NRN NRN NRN NRN Operational NRN NRN NRN NRN Group (OG) NRN NRN NRN Thematic NRN Network (TN) NRN NRN NRN NRN NRN NRN NRN NRN NRN NRN NRN NRN
What is an Operational Group (OG) ? • EIP operational groups funded under rural development programmes are multi-actor, project based and tackle a certain practical problem or opportunity which may lead to an innovation • The operational group is tailored to this problem/opportunity and makes the best use of different types of knowledge (practical, scientific, technical, organisational, etc) in an interactive way. • The operational group is composed of those key actors (farmers, advisors, researchers, businesses, NGOs etc) which are in the best position to realize the project's goals and to share experiences broadly.
Interactive innovation: Cross-fertilisation is key for tackling complex challenges and developing opportunities for innovation Du choc des idées jaillit la lumière Nicolas Boileau, french philosopher, 17th century > Enlightenment comes when views collide > From the clash of opposing minds, new ideas arise
EIP Operational Groups 2014-2020 • The EIP implementation aims at a flexible and open system for the creation of a multiplicity of operational groups (OGs) • 27 MS and 98 RDPs are implementing the EIP in their 2014- 2020 Rural Development programmes with regular calls for Operational Group projects during this period • 3200 OGs planned in 2014-2020, with cooperation in innovative activities such as the development of new products or practices, pilot projects, supply chain cooperation, environmental projects or climate change actions, cooperation in biomass provision or renewable energy, forest management and much more • EIP provides unique opportunity for better cooperation projects thanks to attention for supporting environment and through the (possible) funding of the preparation process of a project
The first OGs were set up in 2016 ... Some examples: • ValorInVitis – using indigenous varieties and increasing the resilience of production systems to climate change (IT-ER) • Pig health – reducing the use of antibiotics (DE-NS) • Robust lamb in Pyrénées (France) • Winter harvest: seasonal, energy extensive and innovative vegetable production (Austria) • Establishing a sustainable and environment friendly wheat value chain (Germany) • FruitNet - control of Monilinia spp. in stone fruits (Spain) • Aquaponics: nutrients from fish for plant growth (DE – MV) • Organic dock control in grasslands (Austria) • Zero herbicides in Mediterranean perennial crops (France) http://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/content/eip-agri-workshop-operational- groups-first-experiences https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/og_booklet_eip- agri_sem-athens-2017_en.pdf
Thematic EIP workshops starting: 500 to 700 OG projects are being connected with other OGs and H2020 (since 2017)... Some examples: • EIP-AGRI workshop for organic OGs and MA projects "Organic is operational" (June 2017): https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/ws-oio-2017- projects_document_en.pdf • EIP-AGRI Workshop: "Innovation in the supply chain: creating value together" (Feb 2018) 44 OGs and 9 MA H2020 project networking on New business models and new ways of organising the supply chain, New products and processes https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/event/eip-agri-workshop-innovation- supply-chain-creating • Various initiatives (events) being taken by MS and H2020 thematic networks to connect OGs: DE, HU, SI, EL, Sheepnet, Eurodairy, etc (some examples in subgroup innovation 22 Feb 2018)
OG projects: first indications In terms of scope: Top 5 • Plant protection • Precision farming • Agro-environment • New supply chains • Organic farming N.B. Initial clustering analysis covering 231 OGs – Oct 2016. New clustering starting now (Feb 2018)
Examples of an Innovation Support Service: one to one brokering function A farmer Innovation support centre Company selling Ammonia Researchers reducing pig stable VITO (environm) bacteria ILVO (agric) products group Project objective: develop a pig stable reducing ammonia emissions by 50 % in a more cost-efficient way than existing stable systems (idea from a farmer, brokered by the Innovation Support Centre)
Innovation Support Services emerging: • Innovation advice and promotion • Coaching farmers towards innovation (Innovation Prize) • Brainstorming events and animation • Brokering function (building a project) • Coordination and facilitation of projects as an intermediate between partners • Dissemination of innovative results • Connect with SME and other innovation services and funding
3. EIP-AGRI's H2020 research and innovation side
H2020 Multi-actor approach - Key elements EU research and innovation projects The two most important principles are: • to focus on end-users’ problems/opportunities and develop innovative solutions which cover real needs. End-users like farmers, foresters or businesses will be more motivated to use the project results, because they were incorporated in generating them and therefore feel "co-ownership" • to bring together the most relevant partners with the needed complementary type of knowledge which helps solving problems and tackling opportunities e.g.: farmers, advisors, researchers, suppliers, processors, agencies and/or other actors, who co-operate and co-innovate in project activities from the beginning till the end. Detailed requirements in H2020 WP introduction p. 9 http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018- 2020/main/h2020-wp1820-food_en.pdf
H2020 Thematic networks : Compiling knowledge ready for practice • Multi-actor coordination action: Partners should summarise, share and present existing scientific knowledge & best practices that are not sufficiently known (and applied) by practitioners , in an easy understandable concise way ready for practice • Themes to be chosen bottom-up, contributing to a more competitive sustainable agriculture and forestry • Themes must focus on the most urgent needs of agricultural or forestry production sectors, • Projects involving the actors relevant for the chose theme (e.g. researchers, farmers, advisors, enterprises, education, NGOs, administration, regulatory bodies, EIP project groups…) (Many EU 13 involved)
22 H2020 bottom-up Thematic Networks so far (1) calls 2014-2016 – a complementary set of themes (sectors) Cereals: organic/low input cereal food systems for biodiversity and RUR 10 - 2016 CERERE quality (production, processing, marketing) Pig husbandry: health management, precision production, welfare RUR 10 - 2016 Eu PiG and meat quality RUR 10 - 2016 Inno4Grass Productive grasslands: profitability and environmental services RUR 10 - 2016 SheepNet Improving sheep productivity ISIB 2 - 2014 Winetwork Wine diseases: Grapevine Trunk Disease and Flavescence dorée ISIB 2 - 2014 OKNetArable Organic agriculture - arable crops ISIB 2 - 2014 Hennovation Animal welfare hens ISIB 2 - 2015 4D4F Data and sensor driven decision making on dairy farms Practice-based innovations in dairy farming: resource efficiency, ISIB 2 - 2015 EuroDairy Biodiversity, Animal care, and Socio-economic resilience Fruit: cultivar development, minimize residues, storage and fruit ISIB 2 - 2015 EUFRUIT quality, sustainability of production systems
22 H2020 bottom-up Thematic Networks so far (2) a complementary set of themes (cross-cutting themes) RUR 10 - 2016 SKIN Stimulating innovation and good practices in short supply chains Agroforestry: sylvoarable and sylvopastural systems' design, RUR 10 - 2016 AFINET management and profitability ISIB 2 - 2014 Agri-Spin Innovation brokering methods AGRIFORVALO ISIB 2 - 2015 Valorization of biomass side-streams from agriculture and forest R Smart Farming Technology: Management Information Systems, ISIB 2 - 2015 Smart-AKIS Precision Agriculture and Agriculture automation and robotics ISIB 2 - 2015 HNV-Link Support HNV farmlands through knowledge and innovation WATER 4B - Optimize water and nutrient use efficiency: dbase on innovative FERTINNOWA 2015 technologies and practices for fertigation of horticultural crops A short film explaining how a thematic network works: https://youtu.be/mVsW4--ex0M
2017 H2020 bottom-up Thematic Networks (3) another complementary set of themes (cross-cutting themes) Upscaling biomass production and pre- ENABLING processing for bio-based value chains Non Wood Forest Products: Cork, Resins and INCREdible Edibles in the Mediterranean basin New Entrant netWork: Business models for NEWBIE Innovation, entrepreneurship and resilience OK-Net Organic Knowledge Network on Monogastric EcoFeed Animal Feed (pigs, broilers, hens) PANACEA Non-food Crops’ penetration path
1 bio Euro H2020 Multi-actor projects in total in 7 years: WPs 2014-2017: 500 mio Euro – 80 Multi-actor projects WP 2018-2020: More multi-actor topics/projects in Horizon 2020 500 mio Euro – another 100 MA projects (incl TNs)
4. Conclusions EIP evaluation study a) Published February 2017, by 5 external contractors b) https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/external- studies/2016/eip-2016/eval_en.pdf
Conclusions: • The EIP is a unique funding for innovative opportunities, highly appreciated also, because of bottom-up + coverage of real needs/opportunities • This is demonstrated by the vast majority of Member States having prioritised and programmed this new and voluntary measure • The EIP flexibility allows it to be shaped to widely different circumstances and innovation infrastructure, tackling the gap between research and practice • Where EIP networks and National Rural Networks have been active in MS, they have strongly promoted the EIP Recommendations: • Avoid watering down EIP’s distinctive practical bottom-up approach • Enable advance payments and innovation support services • Create further networking, multiplication and linkages generating extra EU added value => connecting and widening EU AKIS (e.g. cross-visits, …)
Jean Monnet Father of Europe Speech on 12/05/1954 “Ce qui nous arrête, c’est la peur du changement. Et pourtant c’est du changement que dépend notre salut” “What stops us is the fear of change. And nevertheless, it is on change that our salvation depends”
Calls for Operational Groups (OG) (informal state of play 25 January 2018) 1st call to open soon 1st call now open OG projects finished, selected and/or being evaluated
4. Future of the EIP-AGRI: What do we have and where do we go? EIP evaluation study: a) https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/external- studies/2016/eip-2016/eval_en.pdf SWG SCAR-AKIS Policy Brief on the Future of Advisory Services: on advisor's competences, interconnections and future more interactive roles, etc a) https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri- eip/files/policy_brief_on_the_future_of_advisory_services_scar_aki s_06102017.pdf PROAKIS Study: a) www.proakis.eu
Characterising MS' AKIS An overview of MS' AKISs (PROAKIS, as of 2014): fragmented or integrated, strong or weak 29
CAP post 2020 Communication "The future of food and farming": involves also the future for AKISs “The European Innovation Partnership for Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability (EIP-AGRI) and the European Innovation Partnership on Water have proven their value in mobilising the agricultural sector for innovation. It has funded multi-participant pilot projects and is networking across Europe to make new knowledge generally available. Its success depends on the combined performance of advisors, agricultural training and educational systems, researchers and farmer organisations often referred to as the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS) which operates very differently from one Member States to another. The role of the farm advisor stands out as particularly important. A modern CAP should support the strengthening of farm advisory services within the AKIS systems. This should become a condition for the approval of CAP Strategic plans.” Read the Communication: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/future-of- cap/future_of_food_and_farming_communication_en.pdf
CAP post 2020 Communication – The future of food and farming – Clarification memo on AKISs (1) “Why does the CAP need to support innovation? What is the rationale? Agriculture and our rural areas face a number of challenges for which new solutions need to be found. We need better advice and more innovation. Public involvement in research and innovation is necessary to bridge the gap between rural areas in demand of digital innovations and better connectivity and providers of new technologies. It makes sense to cooperate on research an innovation at EU level. By learning from each other in different parts of the EU we will develop better knowledge and will adopt innovation faster. Read the Memo: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-4842_en.htm
CAP post 2020 Communication – The future of food and farming – Clarification memo on AKIS (2) “How will this new approach function in practice?” The Union should set the basic policy parameters based on the objectives of the CAP, …the already agreed objectives and targets on for instance the environment, climate change (COP 21), and a number of sustainable development goals. Each Member State should establish a "CAP strategic plan", which would cover interventions in both pillar I and pillar II. This plan will tailor CAP interventions to maximise their contribution to EU objectives taking better into account local conditions and needs, against such objectives and targets. At the same time, Member States would also have a greater say in designing the compliance and control framework applicable to beneficiaries (including controls and penalties). ….
CAP post 2020 Communication – The future of food and farming – Clarification memo on AKIS (3) “How will this new approach function in practice?” (continued) These strategic plans would be prepared not in isolation but in the framework of a structured process and the Commission would assess and approve such plans. This would maximise the contribution of the CAP towards the EU priorities and objectives and the achievement of Member States' climate and energy targets. It would also enhance the EU added value and preserve a functioning agricultural internal market. While Member States should bear greater responsibility and be more accountable as to how they meet the objectives and achieve agreed targets, the new approach will continue to ensure a level playing field, preserving the common nature and the two pillars of the policy. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-4842_en.htm
CAP post 2020 Communication – The future of food and farming – Clarification memo on AKIS (4) “How will the future CAP support farmers in protecting the environment?” (+ young farmers etc) As a foundation, farmers receiving income support from the CAP will have to apply various environment- and climate-friendly practices. Member States will determine the detail of these - in line with the need to meet EU-level objectives but also taking into account national, regional and local circumstances. Eco-friendly action which goes beyond this foundational level of good practice will be supported through schemes which are voluntary for farmers - at a relatively basic level, and above that more advanced schemes. The CAP will also place strong emphasis on unlocking the potential of research, innovation, training and the use of advice to improve care for the environment and climate, including through greater resource (as in Baltic Deal etc)
CAP post 2020 – The future of food and farming – involves also the future for AKIS • The rationale for these sentences is that the efficiency and effectiveness of advisory services can best be upgraded by improving their connections within the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems and sharing knowledge and innovative applications more intensively. • (See SWG SCAR-AKIS Policy Brief on the Future of Advisory services on advisor's future interactive competences, interconnections and roles) https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri- eip/files/policy_brief_on_the_future_of_advisory_services_scar_akis_06102017. pdf • To perform such an upgrade of advisory services, a transition period is needed. Such a transition AKIS plan will form a part of the CAP Strategic Plans to be approved.
CAP post 2020 Incentivising CAP Strategic creativity by AKIS plans structuring knowledge flows (cross-fertilisation in SWG SCAR-AKIS ongoing) between key actors
CAP post 2020 – The future of food and farming – 3 key actors in strengthened AKIS with stronger knowledge flows in and between MSs: • (1) Advisors (broad concept but independent of commercial interests) – often closest to farmers, bring in and funnel needs from farmers/end-users and communicate back to them. Could also be repres. of ngos, farmers’ org etc 2. Many kinds of people are so-called “advisor”. What should be the criteria for being considered an advisor? 2.1. Impartial, having the competence and means to enhance the ability to change Advice comes from an individual advisor, which may belong to an entity (private or public/small or big), with a conscious ambition to intervene so that the customer (broadly defined) improves his/her ability to change. The purpose is communication and an intervention in order to support change. This is only possible if the advisor has the competence and the means (f.i. financial resources) to do it. The advisor should be impartial and not promoting a specific product or technology. One definition of extension/advisory services is that advisory services are 'conscious interventions in order to create better preconditions for change, carried through by an entity having the means and competence to do it'. Farmers may receive substantial and often valuable information from companies in the context of their commercial objectives. However, farmers need to be enabled to receive independent “advice” that is not part of a “product service” package. https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri- eip/files/policy_brief_on_the_future_of_advisory_services_scar_akis_061 02017.pdf
CAP post 2020 – The future of food and farming – 3 key actors in strengthened AKIS with stronger knowledge flows: • (2) Researchers (broad concept but with a focus on impact on end-users) – bring in local/national science & networks (At EU level DG AGRI will continue research efforts under FP9) (3) Networks (again broad) reinforcing MS AKIS, and connecting with EU level AKIS - EIP/rural network): • Rural networks at national levels, local at regional levels • Thematic networks at national/regional/EU • Etc…? Bringing in and translating info from EU and other countries (in particular innovation projects OGs, MA, TN etc) and returning info from MS to EU to other MS
Strengthening AKISs – Inspiration? Examples of recent evolutions of strengthened AKIS, often induced by the EIP funding • Poland EIP network: A+N • Hungary AKIS: R+A • Ireland: R+A • Slovakia: N + A • France: R + A + N • Wales Innovation Hub (EIP seminar May 2017):R+A • Scotland Nov 2017 Innovation support service : R+A • Etc… (Further brainstorming in SWG SCAR-AKIS)
Having potential innovative knowledge is one thing, turning it into reality is another. "The value of an idea lies in the using of it." Thomas Alva Edison – inventor of the light bulb
Building an EU AKIS Speed up creativity and practice application Better connectivity and quicker circulation of information
Innovation is: an idea put into practice with success ! Engage in a better connected European AKIS: To an „Agriculture of Knowledge“ ….. Thank you for your attention! Inge.Van-Oost@ec.europa.eu www.eip-agri.eu
Where can you find more info? • EIP brochure on multi-actor projects: NEW • https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/eip- agri_brochure_multi-actor_projects_2017_en_web.pdf • EIP brochure on thematic networks & practice abstracts • http://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/eip- agri_brochure_thematic_networks_2016_en_web.pdf • EIP common format for practice abstracts • https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/en/content/eip-agri-common- format • Videostreamed seminar on drafting practice abstracts: • http://www.ncp-biohorizon.net/events?cmd=showDetail&id=33 • Links to NRNs: National Rural Networks can help in partner search between H2020 consortia and EIP Operational Groups • http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/enrd-static/networks-and- networking/nrn-information/en/nrn-information_en.html
a) More info on Multi-actor projects under Horizon 2020 a) https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/en/publications/eip-agri- brochure-horizon-2020-multi-actor : brochure with basics and examples b) http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018 -2020/main/h2020-wp1820-food_en.pdf page 9 Multi-actor requirements
Videostreamed presentation on Multi-actor approach and Thematic Networks in call 2016: (from 0:53:00 till 01:47:00) https://scic.ec.europa.eu/streaming/workshop-on-multi-actor- approach-and-thematic-networks-under-horizon-2020 Basic info + questions & answers Workshop "Interactive innovation in motion: multi-actor projects and thematic networks under Horizon 2020" 24/11/2015: Event page: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2 020/en/news/interactive-innovation- motion-multi-actor-projects-and-thematic- networks-under-horizon-2020
How to build a successful Horizon 2020 multi-actor project?
How to build a successful Horizon 2020 multi-actor project?
How to build a successful Horizon 2020 multi-actor project?
How to build a successful Horizon 2020 multi-actor project?
TREASURE, a Horizon 2020 multi-actor project on traditional resources for agricultural diversity and the food chain Each partner (academia or non-academia) with a clear and visible role in the project i.e. various actors (e.g. farmers) involved from work planning to dissemination, demonstration Photos from on-going experiments in Croatia, France, Slovenia Field experiments conducted in „real life“ situations working directly with farmers e.g. linked TP => cross-fertilisation Marjeta Čandek-Potokar KISof knowledge/ideas (Agricultural Institute of Slovenia) Agriculture R&I conference, Brussels, 26-28 January 2016 https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/designing-path- conference-eu-agricultural-ri-videos-presentations-and-outcomes
What info is to be shared through the EIP common format for practitioners? • Short and easily understandable title (one key sentence, max 150 char.) • Short innovative info in easily understandable language (max 1500 char.) ='practice abstracts': • What problem will the knowledge generated solve for the end-user? What will be the main benefits to the practitioner? • Main outcome/recommendation (2-3 main results) • Contact data: Project coordinator (+ address, e-mail, telephone), text editor, project partners (+ address, e-mail, telephone), geographical location, project period, funding source & budget, link to project website and to a website where info stays long-term available
An example of a practice abstract from Fertinnowa Application of zeolite to reduce nitrates concentration in growing media and soil Areas like the Albenga plain in Liguria Region (Italy) are classified as “areas vulnerable to nitrates” and are under specific legislation to limit nitrate contamination of superficial and deep water bodies. The addition of zeolite to the source of nitrogen can improve the nitrogen use efficiency and reduce the environmental impact caused by nitrates leaching. Thanks to the specific atomic structure of clinoptilolite (a kind of zeolite) nitrifying bacteria are stopped from entering the tiny pores of the clinoptilolite. The ammonium is held internally on the cation-exchange sites and is not likely to be leached out easily as water passes through. As a consequence, nitrification and thus nitrate leaching is reduced. Secondly, zeolites improve nitrogen use efficiency because they act as a medium that slowly releases fertilisers. Trials in the Albenga area have demonstrated that the addition of zeolite to the soil substrate both in open field (vegetables) and in greenhouse (ornamentals) lead to a reduction of nitrates concentration in the substrate. For the best result, add clinoptilolite at a rate of 3% weight/weight when preparing the substrate for crop cultivation: • for potted plants: mixed in the peat based substrate (normally added with slow release fertiliser); • for open field cultivation: mixed in the first 20-30 cm of soil through tillage.
1.b) EIP Workprogramme Sep-Dec 2017 networking activities • Focus Groups (finished or running): state of play • Agri Innovation Summit Lisbon 11-12 Oct • Workshop “Innovation in the supply chain: Creating value together” • Website development, including for OG and MA projects
EIP-AGRI Focus Group State of play 1 Organic farming – Optimising arable yields Final report Factsheet Brochure 2 Protein crops Final report Brochure 3 Animal husbandry - Reducing antibiotic Final report use in pig farming Brochure 4 Genetic resources – Cooperation models Final report Factsheet Brochure 5 Soil organic matter content in Final report Mediterranean regions Factsheet Brochure* 6 IPM for Brassica Final report Brochure 7 High Nature Value – Farming profitability Final report Factsheet 8 Mainstreaming precision farming Final report Factsheet 9 Profitability of permanent grassland Final report Factsheet 10 Fertiliser efficiency – Focus on Final report horticulture in open field Factsheet 11 Optimising profitability of crop production Final report through Ecological Focus Areas Factsheet 12 Innovative short food supply chain Final report management Factsheet
EIP-AGRI Focus Group State of play 13 IPM practices for soil-borne diseases Final report Factsheet Brochure* 14 New entrants into farming Final report Factsheets 15 Water & agriculture Final report Factsheet Brochure 16 Mixed farming systems: Livestock/cash crops Final report Factsheet 17 Benchmarking farm productivity and Final report sustainability performance Factsheet 18 Livestock emissions – Reducing emissions Final report from cattle farming Factsheet 19 Nutrient recycling Ongoing 2nd meeting held 20 Sustainable mobilisation of forest biomass Ongoing 2nd meeting held 21 Robust and resilient dairy production systems Ongoing 2nd meeting held 22 Agroforestry: introducing woody vegetation Ongoing into specialised crop and livestock systems 2nd meeting held 23 Diseases and Pests in Viticulture Ongoing 2nd meeting held * The brochure ‘Soil organic matter matters’ covers topics from the ‘Soil organic matter’ and the ‘Soil-borne diseases’ Focus Groups.
EIP-AGRI Focus Group 2017 State of play 24 New forest practices and tools for adaptation Ongoing and mitigation of climate change 2nd meeting held 25 Grazing for carbon Ongoing 2nd meeting held 26 Moving from source to sink in arable First meeting farming November 2017 27 Circular Horticulture First meeting November 2017 28 Enhancing production and use of renewable First meeting energy on the farm November 2017
My EIP AGRI: tailored information at your fingertips
More Operational Group examples A selection of OG projects presented at past EIP-GRI events
c) Overview on EIP-AGRI digitisation activities To support digital transformation in agriculture and rural areas EIP-AGRI Brochure Shaping the digital (r)evolution in agriculture https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri- eip/files/eip- agri_brochure_digital_revolution_2017_en_web.pdf
EIP-AGRI June Seminar "Data driven business Precision Farming Benchmarking models" Focus Group Focus Group Uptake New technologies 2014 2015 2016 Impacts October WP 2016-2017: IoT FA: Smart Farming and Food Security September Workshop: "Digitising the agri-food sector"
EIP-AGRI June Seminar "Digital Innovation Hubs: mainstreaming digital agriculture" April October Uptake Workshop "Data Lisbon innovation Sharing" Summit New technologies Impacts 2017 2018 November "H2020 IoF2020 – Digitisation Day" Internet of Food 2020 project Publication WP 2018-2020
Horizon 2020 Workprogramme 2018-2020 * ICT: Topics published under "Information Technology and Communication Uptake Impact Technologies" Work Development Programme *DT-RUR-12- * DT: Topics 2018 - Digital contributing to the Innovation Focus Area "Digitising Hubs for and transforming Agriculture European industry and services" RUR-14-2018 - Digital solutions RUR 2 and e-tools to RUR-02-2018 - Socio- RUR 12 modernise the CAP economic RUR 13 impacts of RUR 14 RUR-13-2018 - **DT-ICT-08- digitisation of Enabling the 2019 - Agricultural agriculture and • + SFS and BG topics farm advisor digital integration rural areas contributing to the community to platforms prepare Focus Area "Digitising farmers for the **DT-ICT-09- and transforming EU digital age 2020 - Digital industry and services: service platforms DT-SFS-14-2018, DT- for rural SFS-26-2019, DT-BG- economies 04-2018-2019
You can also read