Technical Assistance Consultant's Report - Sustainable and ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report
Project Number: 48323-001
January 2018
Republic of Indonesia: Sustainable and Inclusive
Energy Program
(Financed by the Agence Française de Développement and the
Technical Assistance Special Fund)
Appendix E: PLN PV Procurement Workshop Support
Appendix F: Renewable Incentives FGD 1—Current Policies
Appendix G: Renewable Incentives FGD 2—Financing Gaps
Prepared by Castlerock Consulting, Indonesia in association with Economic Consulting
Associates Ltd, United Kingdom and PT. Q Energy South East Asia, Indonesia
For Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
Ministry of Finance
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and
ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents.
APPENDIX E: PLN PV PROCUREMENT WORKSHOP REPORT
REPORT
Technical Assistance to PLN:
Workshop on Solar PV Procurement
23-24 May 2017
E-1
SIEP Final Report – January 2018
Acknowledgement
This report was prepared by Castlerock Consulting under a policy and technical assistance
grant administered by the Asian Development Bank (ADB): Sustainable and Inclusive Energy
Program (PATA 8826-INO). Inputs were provided by PT Synergy Engineering, Mott
MacDonald, and Hadiputranto, Hadinoto and Partners.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the
governments they represent.
ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no
responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products
of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in
preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by
using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to
the legal or other status of any territory or area.
E-2
Executive Summary
Under Government Regulation No. 79 of 2014 on the National Energy Policy, the Government
of Indonesia has targeted new and renewable energy to provide 23% of primary energy needs
by 2025 (up from 6% in 2015). This target has been reaffirmed in the National Energy Plan
signed by President Joko Widodo in January 2017. In addition, the country’s Nationally
Determined Contribution to the Paris Agreement of 2015 calls for a 29% reduction greenhouse
gas emission by 2030.
As the state-owned enterprise for electricity supply, PLN (Perusahaan Listrik Negara – State
Electricity Company) has planned accordingly to develop electricity by utilizing renewable
energy. As stated in the Electricity Supply Business Plan (Rencana Usaha Penyediaan
Tenaga Listrik, RUPTL) 2017-2026, PLN plans to expand electricity generation capacity to
fulfill demand growth and to increase their supply by utilizing local energy resources, especially
renewable energy.
By November 2016, total installed capacity of generation in Indonesia had reached 51,915
MW which consists of PLN-owned generation of 39,859 MW, independent power producer
(IPP)-owned generation of 8,867 MW and rented generation of 3,192 MW. Out of this total,
44% of total capacity is from coal power plants, 29.3% from gas power plants, 11.1% from
diesel power plants, 8.9% from hydro power plants, 3.2% from oil-steamed power plants, 2.6%
from geothermal, and 0.2% from various renewable energy.
In January 2017, the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR) issued broad-based
guidelines for purchasing electricity from renewable energy sources. Ministerial Regulation
MEMR (Peraturan Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral, Permen ESDM) No.12/2017
establishes pricing and selection guidance for all forms of renewable energy (including solar
photovoltaic, wind, hydropower, biomass, biogas, municipal waste, and geothermal). This
regulation requires PLN to purchase electricity from renewable sources with reference to
national targets, prioritize the dispatch of renewable-based generation projects below 10
megawatts (MW) as “must-run” plants, and develop standardized procurement documents
and power purchase agreements (PPAs). It requires tendering of wind and solar projects in in
packages of at least 15 MW each and provides a benchmark price for all renewable generation
technologies.
The state-owned electricity corporation, PLN, plans to issue several tenders for solar and wind
power procurement under this new regulation in the coming months, representing the first
large-scale tenders for renewables in the country. The first tender will be for a combined 167
MW of solar power plants in Sumatera. The benchmark price will be tied to local average cost
of generation (Biaya Pokok Penyediaan, BPP), which is approximately USD 7 cents/kWh. PLN
plans to subsequently tender solar packages for Kalimantan, Maluku and Papua, and West
Java. As stipulated by Permen ESDM 12/2017, PLN is also preparing standard power
purchase agreements (PPAs) and standard bidding documents.
As part of on-going assistance for clean energy development, ADB, in collaboration with AFD,
has been providing support to PLN with tender preparation. ADB conducted a one-week
consultation with PLN with a team comprising a solar PV specialist, power system planner,
and other specialists in Jakarta.
The workshop was designed to help PLN have a better understanding of solar PV
procurement. It covered grid connection issues, solar PV development issues, and commercial
E-3
and legal issues. The workshop was followed up by one day of in-depth one-on-one
consultations between PLN engineers and the consultants.
Representatives from PLN Headquarters and Regional Offices attended the workshop and
one-on-one consultations. Representatives from ADB and AFD also attended the series of
activities.
The main findings from the workshop are as follows:
The effectiveness of solar PV procurement is still an issue for PLN. The grid code and
distribution code do not adequately address renewable energy integration, particularly
given the intermittent nature of wind and PV power generation.
The selection of projects was largely conducted in an ad hoc manner, with the
bolstering of areas with forecast power deficits being the main criterion for project
selection. As a result, many projects do not appear to be technically feasible due to
grid conditions.
PLN has not conducted any grid-connected solar PV procurement to date. The
rationale and objectives of the solar procurement seems unclear for some PLN
Regional Office staff.
PLN seeks performance guarantees from IPPs, but guaranteeing energy production
from solar and other intermittent power projects is not possible due to their intermittent
and uncertain nature. For solar PV, PLN’s PPA instead works on the basis of
guaranteeing plant capacity under defined operating conditions. However, this
approach is not used elsewhere in the world.
E-4
Contents
Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... E-3
Introduction ...................................................................................................................... E-6
Background .................................................................................................................. E-6
Objective ...................................................................................................................... E-6
Proposed Assistance ................................................................................................... E-6
Agenda ......................................................................................................................... E-7
Presentation..................................................................................................................... E-7
Integration of Intermittent Renewable Power Plant in Power System Planning ........... E-7
Grid Impact Studies for Integrating Utility Scale Solar PV into PLN Networks ............. E-8
Solar PV Generation in the Region .............................................................................. E-8
Solar Development Challenges in Indonesia ............................................................... E-9
Procurement of Solar PV Projects ............................................................................. E-10
Solar PV Power Purchase Agreement ....................................................................... E-10
Findings ......................................................................................................................... E-11
Recommendation for next step ...................................................................................... E-12
Appendix 1: Workshop’s Agenda................................................................................... E-14
Appendix 2: Workshop’s Documentation ....................................................................... E-16
E-5
SIEP Final Report – January 2018
Introduction
Background
1. The Government of Indonesia recognizes that a climate-friendly social and economic
development path is a key factor for sustainable development. The government has set the
target to reduce emissions by 29% by 2030, and this reduction could reach 41% subject to
availability of international support. In addition, the government has set an ambitious target
of 23% of renewable energy share in its primary energy mix by 2025 in the 2014 National
Energy Policy, which has been reaffirmed in the National Energy Plan. To increase
renewable energy production in the electricity mix, the Ministry of Energy and Mineral
Resources (MEMR) of the Republic of Indonesia stipulated Ministerial Regulation No.
12/2017 on Utilization of Renewable Energy Resources for Electricity Supply.
2. According to the Electricity Law No. 30/2009, the government is obliged to control the
electricity supply. Through national electricity company Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN),
the government controls electricity supply, distribution, and demand. Ministerial Regulation
No.12/2017 also mandates (i) PLN to purchase electricity from renewable energy
generators to achieve the targeted energy mix and electrification targets, and (ii) the manner
in which PLN may procure electricity supply from various renewable energy resources.
3. In PLN’s Electricity Supply Business Plan (RUPTL, Rencana Usaha Penyediaan
Tenaga Listrik), developing new and renewable energy is one of PLN’s policy objectives.
Therefore, PLN is planning to develop new and renewable energy in the form of geothermal,
hydro, wind, solar, and bioenergy. Furthermore, PLN is obliged to treat renewable energy
projects with a capacity below 10MW as “must run” plants. PLN must procure solar PV and
wind projects through open tender. Adequate preparation of the tender process is the key
to achieve positive outcomes and low prices. The required preparation includes (i) technical
analysis (i.e. resource quality analysis and grid studies), and (ii) commercial analysis.
However, PLN has only limited resources and capacity to develop proper criteria based on
technical and commercial studies.
Objective
4. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Agence Francaise de Developpment (AFD)
are jointly providing technical assistance to PLN to support the renewable energy
procurement preparation. The objective of the support is as follows:
a. To improve PLN’s knowledge on renewable energy tendering preparation
b. To improve the capacity of PLN’s staff on the tendering process.
c. To provide PLN with methods and support to evaluate the suitability of particular
sites for solar PV development from the standpoint of grid conditions.
d. To provide inputs for preparation of a standard power purchase agreement (PPA)
and standard bidding documents in purchasing renewable energy by PLN.
Proposed Assistance
5. ADB-AFD initiated the assistance with a 3-day consultation with a team comprising:
Solar PV Specialist
Power System Planner
Other specialists (legal expert, renewable energy tender specialist)
6. The assistance included a one-day workshop, covering technical issues and
commercial issues on solar PV procurement process.
E-6
7. Key technical and commercial issues for PLN were discussed during the workshop.
This covered grid integration (injection from renewable energy and stability), technical and
economic criteria for tendering, and key aspects in the PPA for renewable energy. Lessons
learned from renewable energy procurement, primarily solar PV, from selected countries
were presented as well. This aims to increase PLN’s knowledge on solar PV so they can
prepare proper tendering processes and criteria in the future.
Agenda
8. The assistance was conducted in 4th week of May (please see attachment 1 for
detailed agenda), with detailed scheduled as follows:
22 May – Afternoon – Kickoff meeting within the team to discuss issues
23 May – workshop at PLN on solar PV procurement – technical and commercial
issues
24 May – detailed one-on-one consultations in small groups at PLN - with engineers
from PLN Wilayahs and Pusat.
Presentations
Integration of Intermittent Renewable Power Plant in Power System
Planning
9. Renewable energy (RE) penetration into power systems globally will continue to grow
rapidly as has been forecasted by the International Energy Agency in their Energy Outlook
2015, as well as BP in their energy outlook. Both analyses show that renewable energy will
be the highest growth in electricity power production compared to other types of primary
energy resources. One of the reasons for this is the declining price of RE, mainly solar and
wind. A defining characteristic of RE is energy from a sustainable natural resource, but
production is intermittent, which makes RE more difficult to integrate into power systems.
10. Economic evaluation of RE rests mainly on the capital expense as operation and
maintenance expense is minor. Economic evaluation will depend principally on construction
cost, and its economic life and discount rate, which reflects the cost of financing. Other
important parameters that must be considered are availability of RE resources and their
characteristics. This will determine the productivity of RE.
11. RE resource availability will determine the energy that is produced, hence it will
determine the economic viability as well. There are several publicly available sources of
information on resource availability but they are usually not as detailed and accurate as
needed for an in-depth, investment-grade analysis. At least using this information, we can
estimate and approach the characteristic.
12. One such source of information is the Energy Sector Management Assistance
Program (ESMAP) World Solar Irradiation Atlas (http://globalsolaratlas.info/). This
site provides average solar irradiation around the world with 1 km-sq resolution. This
allows us to estimate production of a solar power plant anywhere in the world.
13. Intermittency is one challenge that must be considered when integrating RE into
power systems. There are several mitigations that are available and implementable for RE
intermittency. These include site size limitation, multiple site diversity, storage, fast
response conventional generation elsewhere on the grid and forecasting of RE output.
These mitigations will be more effective if supported by regulation, such as grid and
distribution code.
14. There are several simulation tools for integrating RE into power system capacity
expansion planning. One of the simulation tools is PLEXOS Simulator by Energy Exemplar.
E-7
This simulation will optimize capacity planning (long term), create a production simulation
by optimizing available resources, and show chronologic dispatch of each power plant.
15. Sumba Island was used as a case study in the presentation. Data on solar and wind
have hourly resolution for 1 year and were extended into 10 years of simulation time.
Results of the simulation show that a combination of RE (solar & wind) and fossil energy
(gas engine) is needed in Sumba. This shows that fossil fuel is still needed, while RE will
minimize the consumption of LNG. Fossil fuel is still needed for supporting capacity need,
while RE will support on energy need. This sort of capacity expansion planning should be
followed by grid impact studies.
Grid Impact Studies for Integrating Utility Scale Solar PV into PLN Networks
16. This presentation describes a structured approach to performing grid impact studies
for the interconnection of utility scale solar PV into PLN’s networks. Because PLN is
responsible for hundreds of separate electricity grids around Indonesia, a single “one size
fits all” approach and assessment criteria is neither practical nor advisable. Rather, the
concept of “weak” and “strong” grid connections are introduced taking into account the
characteristics of the network relative to the power plant to be connected.
17. Weak grid connections are subdivided into high impedance and low inertia
connection points. A weak high impedance connection point is one that has a Short Circuit
Ratio (SCR) of less than 3 (as per IEEE Std 1204). These types of connection points are
typically characterized by long radial upstream feeders and low short circuit levels, leading
to issues relating to voltage regulation / stability and increases in active power losses.
18. A weak low inertia connection point is associated with the connection of a large power
plant relative to the frequency response characteristics of the system, i.e. the power plant
has a large influence on the frequency of the system. It is proposed that a connection point
is weak if the Stiffness Ratio (SR) is less than 4. Low inertia connection points are typically
associated with small isolated power systems with a high mix of diesel or gas engine
generator capacity (i.e. low inertia machines). The key issues surrounding low inertia
connection points are frequency stability and issues with conventional generator dispatch
and loading (such as maintaining minimum machine loading and spinning reserve).
19. Lastly, strong connection points are those that have SCR >3 and SR >4. In such
cases, there are no major issues foreseen in the connection of solar PV plants and standard
grid impact studies apply for checking the evacuation of the power to the grid and short
circuit contributions.
Solar PV Generation in the Region
20. Despite huge resources and ambitious national and regional targets, uptake of solar
in South East Asia (SEA) has been limited so far. The main barriers identified so far include:
– Data availability for preliminary assessments,
– Grid connection and integration,
– Access to land,
– Regulatory frameworks (complex, frequently changing),
– Perception of high cost still exists,
– Very short timelines for bid preparations,
– Local content expectations,
– Access to financing,
– Poor track record of some projects.
E-8
21. These barriers can be overcome by an adequate procurement approach and lessons
learned from existing projects in the region. Various approaches that could be applied to
minimize the cost of energy in equatorial regions include the following:
– Optimisation of DC/AC ratio
– East / East-West facing orientation
– Layout optimization for complex terrain
– Component selection based on latest technical developments and the site
conditions.
22. Procurement rules should allow new trends that provide value for money, as long as
they don’t compromise the robustness of the projects. Current engineering, procurement
and construction (EPC) cost in SEA region is ~USD 1,000/kWp for utility scale projects with
good access. A very clear downward trend in cost can be observed, but conditions vary
greatly and so do costs. All technical and commercial elements need to be considered when
comparing tariffs achieved internationally (as evident from the comparison between Dubai
and Indonesia projects):
– Irradiation
– Economies of scale
– Local content restrictions
– Land cost
– Responsibility for grid interconnection costs
– Taxes and import duties
– Country, currency and off-taker risk
– Financing costs, and
– PPA term and escalation provisions
Solar Development Challenges in Indonesia
23. Solar resource estimation is not yet mature for the Indonesian context. It is necessary
to consider both ground-measured and satellite-derived data to ensure confidence in
revenue estimates, to capture (i) long-term climate; (ii) modelling uncertainty; (iii)
microclimate effects; and (iv) any impacts from air pollution.
24. BMKG (Indonesia Agency for Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics) has more
than 60 meteorological stations with solar irradiation measurements. However, this
information is not easily accessible to developers and consultants and its quality needs to
be assessed.
25. Adequate site assessment is key for a successful project. Logistics can have a huge
impact on the delivery of the project and need to be factored in the design and procurement.
26. Lessons from elsewhere in the SEA region regarding design and equipment selection
remain relevant, for example:
– Material selection to avoid corrosion,
– Enclosures for electrical components adequate for high temperatures and
humidity,
– Flood mitigation and drainage design,
27. During operations, inverter outages are typically the key revenue risk under plant
owner control:
– Nuisance trips from low isolation resistance, particularly during damp periods
(e.g. from DC cable selection; damage to cable insulation; poorly specified
ducting; inadequate drainage),
– Nuisance trips due to over-voltage and/or coordination of settings (e.g. for
varied AC cable lengths),
– Lack of local maintenance or spares storage base, particularly for inverter
suppliers without a prior installed base in the country.
E-928. Grid-related constraints on power sales remains a central concern for island networks
(this was discussed in more detail by the other presenters).
Procurement of Solar PV Projects
29. Auctions represent best practice for RE procurement, providing price discovery and
control over volumes and cost. Auction risks can be managed by adequate selection of
design features: demand, qualification requirements, winner selection and seller liabilities.
There is no single formula for successful auctions, but ensuring competition is key.
30. Valuable lessons learned from South African REIPPP, Scaling Solar and Kenyan
auctions study were discussed. A multi-stage, solar specific auction seems appropriate as
a first step in Indonesia. The option of pre-selected sites or at least pre-selected
area/connection substation should be explored.
Solar PV Power Purchase Agreement
31. The presentation highlights the Indonesian solar power purchase agreement, which
is a new model power purchase agreement and relatively different compared to the
previously issued model agreement in 2013.
32. The presentation first covered the contractual structure and objectives of a power
purchase agreement and the roles of the parties involved in a power project in order to get
a general understanding where a power purchase agreement sits and why it is an important
project document.
33. The presentation points out key terms of a power purchase agreement as they relate
to different stages of the project, such as construction, operation, and power supply. Under
the terms of the power purchase agreement, an IPP would be required to construct a power
plant and the transmission line, and be ready to operate by a certain targeted commercial
operation date. The contract will also define consequences of delay, force majeure, term
and termination etc.
34. The solar power purchase agreement introduced by PLN suggests key differences in
terms of supply guarantee from other power purchase agreements. For example, in thermal
PPAs, energy supply guarantee is possible due to constant fuel source, whilst for solar
power purchase agreement, it is impossible for the IPP to guarantee if the sun will shine or
for how long, and therefore, a guarantee is feasible only with respect to plant capacity under
defined operating conditions. However, this type of guarantee is not used elsewhere in the
world; elsewhere it is accepted that PV is intermittent and projects are sized and located so
that the system can compensate for variation in output. The presentation also addresses
the differences in the tariff components for solar power projects where it only comprises
components A (capital cost recovery), B (fixed and variable O&M) and C (transmission line
capital cost recovery).
35. The presentation further addresses the key concerns relating to Regulation of the
Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources No. 10 of 2017 on the terms of a power purchase
agreement ("Reg 10"), which does not apply to solar projects, but PLN indicates that it wants
to follow the same principles under Reg 10 for solar power purchase agreements. Some of
the key concerns are relating to the build-own-operate-transfer (BOOT) model, Force
Majeure conditions (PLN is relieved of payment obligations where PLN cannot take power
due to (natural) Force Majeure, thereby PLN shifts government force majeure risk to power
developers), and the take or pay period, which should be set by taking into account the debt
period.
E-10Findings
36. The following points are the findings from the workshop and one-on-one
consultations with PLN’s staff:
Planning departments from the PLN Wilayahs were given the responsibility
to select the quotas and projects (capacity and location) for the upcoming
solar PV tenders.
From discussions with planning staff, the selection of projects was largely
conducted in an ad hoc manner, with the bolstering of areas with forecast
power deficits being the main criterion for project selection. As a result, there
are many projects that do not appear to be technically feasible since the local
grid conditions were not assessed.
No technical assessment studies were performed for the selection of the
solar PV projects. It appears that PLN has no simulation models for most of
the smaller isolated grids.
During the breakout session, the Sumatera projects were categorized into
Strong, Weak (Low Inertia) and Weak (High Impedance) connections based
on a preliminary screening. PLN will follow up by collecting the required
technical data to conduct a more detailed evaluation.
The participants from procurement divisions were new and had never done
any procurement to date. They expect that the solar procurement would be
rolled-out in Java next year.
The rationale and objectives of the solar procurement seem unclear to some
PLN staff. The workshop was useful to share knowledge and increase buy-
in among stakeholders.
The allocation of capacity for the announced solar tenders is decided by the
planning teams of each Wilayah. It appears that the solar capacity is selected
only based on a simple threshold (e.g. no more than 5% of the total peak
generation capacity in each system). It seems that no specific grid studies
are being conducted to select the capacity allocation or the interconnection
point of the projects.
An area of concern for the participants (shared by the consultant team) is the
feasibility of interconnection and dispatch of future solar PV projects.
Procurement documents were not available for review by the consultant, and
the below findings are purely based on verbal communications from PLN,
which in some cases presented some contradictions.
The basic structure of the procurement seems reasonable with a staged
process: prequalification (PQ) and request for proposal (RFP) stage; and
multi-round approach: one region first and then lessons learned to be applied
to next regions.
The PQ is focused on the capabilities of the prospective bidders to develop,
build and operate the project. It includes legal, financial and track-record
requirements.
The RFP package seems to be still under preparation. The contents of the
RFP are unclear; it was mentioned that it includes a draft PPA, details of the
project sites and the point of interconnection. However, based on
subsequent discussions, it seems that the last two items are actually not
included.
The evaluation is based on a combined technical and financial score. The
weights are not clear at this stage but in other PLN procurement processes
the technical component can have up to a 60% weight.
E-11 The tender timelines are challenging for the bidders, with one week to
respond to the PQ and one month to respond to the RFP. Considering that
the prequalified bidders are provided with little information (no solar data, no
interconnection study) and that the project site is not pre-selected by PLN,
one month seems insufficient to prepare a well-informed proposal.
There is a local content requirement in the tender process. While this is
feasible for some components and beneficial to develop local industry, it
should be carefully considered not to affect the competitiveness. At the
moment, it would seem that the PV module local content requirement
effectively means that there is only one possible Tier 1 supplier.
The documentation of the Scaling Solar initiative was shown to the
participants, with particular focus on the up-front advisory work to select the
project site, define the project capacity and the technical limits of the
interconnection; and the Minimum Functional Specifications.
Guaranteeing supply of energy for solar and other intermittent power projects
is not possible for intermittent power project, and the possible approach is
by way of guaranteeing the plant capacity under defined operating conditions
(Though this is not used elsewhere in the world. Elsewhere PV projects are
sized and located so that the power system can accommodate the variability
of PV output);
The relief of PLN's payment obligation due to PLN’s inability to take power
caused by a force majeure event and the shifting government force majeure
risk to developers are major bankability concerns;
There is no restriction for PLN to set take or pay at full term of PPA; and
There is no regulatory requirement for solar projects to be set on a BOOT
basis;
Recommendations for next steps
37. PLN is undertaking significant efforts to increase the uptake of solar in their system.
The upcoming tenders show some positive features, but the overall impression is that they
might not attract enough competition; bidders will be pricing the risks/uncertainties
associated in the absence of information, and the lack of upfront grid impact/interconnection
studies may compromise the feasibility of some projects.
38. Throughout our interactions during the workshop we have identified several areas of
future work. Below are some proposed follow-up actions which could be supported by ADB-
AFD and carried out by independent consultants:
Assist PLN with technical evaluation of projects already selected for upcoming solar
PV tenders (starting with the Sumatera tender packages) when all data is collected
Assist PLN with developing clearly defined assessment criteria and framework for
conducting grid impact studies. The studies can be further developed into
integration of intermittent RE in power system planning, penetration level of
intermittent RE, and mitigation of intermittency studies.
Assist PLN with developing the grid code and updated distribution code for
renewable energy integration.
PLN (or a consultant) to conduct whole of system studies for each of the major grids
(e.g. Sumatera interconnected system, Jawa-Bali, etc.) that incorporates all
intermittent power plants in the system. This is done to determine system-level
limits for solar PV and wind penetration.
E-12 Solar resource: the solar irradiation data recorded by BMKG meteorological
stations is currently not accessible. Technical support to compile, assess and make
this data easily available would significantly benefit solar development in the
country.
Tender documents: independent review and update of the current tender design
and the existing tender documents: RFQ, RFP (project agreements, studies,
technical requirements) and evaluation criteria.
Grid integration, as elaborated by other presenters:
o Review and update of Grid Code for integration of intermittent renewable
energy generation;
o System studies for each of the major grids to determine potential
penetration of renewables.
Terms of reference for upfront work required to define project sites, project capacity
and technical limits of the interconnection of future tender processes.
Capacity building within the relevant PLN teams on procurement, solar/wind energy
and grid impact studies.
In order to promote and support for the development of solar power projects, PLN
should consider adopting a model of power purchase agreement that applies risk
allocation principles, and removing the major bankability concerns raised by Reg
10;
There must be an integrated view and actions taken by the Government, PLN and
stakeholders in respect of solar projects development and for this purpose, it is
important for the Government to issue an implementing regulation that governs the
development of intermittent power projects.
E-13Appendix 1: Workshop’s Agenda
ADB-AFD Support to PLN on RE Procurement
Venue: PLN Pusat, Jakarta, Indonesia
Participants: Representatives from PLN Pusat and PLN Wilayah
Date: May 22, 2017
Time Agenda Speaker
13.00 pm – Kickoff meeting representatives Led by Toru Kubo
15.00 pm from ADB, AFD, and PLN Asian Development Bank
Date: May 23, 2017
Time Agenda Speaker
9.00 am – 9.30 Registration
am
9.30 am – 10.30 Session 1: Grid impacts on integrating renewable energy
am
9.30 – 10.00 am Integration of renewable power I Made Rosakya
in system planning Castlerock Consulting
10.00 – 10.30 Grid impact studies for Dharma Susanto
am integrating utility-scale solar PV Castlerock Consulting
plants into PLN networks
10.30 – 10.45 Coffee/Tea Break
am
10.45 – 12.15 Session 2: Solar PV Development
pm
10.45 – 11.15 Solar PV generation in the region Mr. Inaki Perez
am Solar Team Leader, Mott MacDonald
11.15 – 11.45 Solar development challenges in Mr. Inaki Perez
am Indonesia Solar Team Leader, Mott MacDonald
11.45 – 12.15 Solar procurement program Mr. Inaki Perez
pm Solar Team Leader, Mott MacDonald
12.15 – 1.30 pm Lunch Break
1.30 - 2.30 pm Session 3: Legal and commercial issues
1.30 - 2.00 pm Legal issues on solar PV Baker MacKenzie
development
2.00 – 2.30 pm Commercial issues Baker MacKenzie
2.30 – 2.45 pm Coffee/Tea Break
2.45 – 3.45 pm Q&A Session
Date: May 24, 2017
Time Agenda Speaker
8.30 – 09.00 Registration
am
09.00 – 10.30 One-on-one consultation on solar pv development
am Resource person: Inaki Perez, Mott McDonald
10.30 – 12.00 One-on-one consultation on grid impacts
pm Resource person: Castlerock Consulting
E-14Time Agenda Speaker
8.30 – 09.00 Registration
am
12.00 – 1.00 Lunch Break
pm
1.00 – 3.00 pm One-on-one consultation on legal and commercial issues
Resource Person: Baker MacKenzie
E-15Appendix 2: Workshop’s Documentation
E-16E-17
APPENDIX F: RENEWABLE INCENTIVES FGD 1 – CURRENT POLICIES
This appendix contains four presentations from MEMR, DEN, INDEF and BKPM which is
presented during the first FGD. The first FGD mainly discuss about the current policy in
Indonesia's RE sector.
These presentations are provided below.
F-1
SIEP Final Report – January 2018KEMENTERIAN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL Outline
DIREKTORAT JENDERAL ENERGI BARU TERBARUKAN DAN KONSERVASI ENERGI
I. Kebijakan dan Peraturan Pengembangan EBTKE 3
II. Potensi dan Target Penyediaan Energi Primer EBT 5
III. Pengembangan Energi Terbarukan berdasarkan RUPTL dan
Roadmap EBT 7
IV. Penyederhanaan Perizinan dan Insentif 10
V. Upaya Pengembangan EBT 13
VI. Tantangan dan Kemitraan Strategis 16
FGD Percepatan Investasi Energi Terbarukan, Jakarta 31 Juli 2017
1 2
KEMENTERIAN ESDM KEMENTERIAN ESDM
I. KEBIJAKAN PERCEPATAN PENGEMBANGAN EBTKE I. Peraturan Pendukung Energi Baru Terbarukan
1. Undang-undang Nomor 30 tahun 2007 tentang Energi; Undang-undang ini merupakan regulasi payung,
Proses bisnis yang semakin jelas, terukur, meskipun memberikan penekanan khusus terhadap EBT Pasal 20 ayat (3) mengamanatkan bahwa
sederhana dan cepat penyediaan energi baru dan energi terbarukan wajib ditingkatkan oleh Pemerintah dan pemerintah daerah sesuai
dengan kewenangannya;
2. Undang-undang Nomor 30 tahun 2009 tentang Ketenagalistrikan;
3. Undang-undang Nomor 21 tahun 2014 tentang Panas Bumi;
4. Undang-undang Nomor 16 tahun 2016 tentang Pengesahan Paris Agreement To The United Nations
Penggunaan teknologi yang efektif, efisien Framework Convention On Climate Change
5. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 79 tahun 2014 tentang Kebijakan Energi Nasional, Pasal 9
dan memberikan keekonomian proyek mengamanatkan bahwa peran Energi Baru dan Energi Terbarukan paling sedikit 23% tahun 2025 dan paling
yang bagus sedikit 31% tahun 2050 sepanjang keekonomiannya terpenuhi;
6. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Panas Bumi untuk Pemanfaatan Tidak Langsung;
7. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 4/2016 tentang Percepatan Infrastruktur Ketenagalistrikan, Pasal 14
mengamanatkan bahwa pelaksanaan percepatan infrastruktur ketenagalistrikan mengutamakan pemanfaatan
energi baru dan terbarukan;
8. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 22/2017 tentang Rencana Umum Energi Nasional (RUEN);
Peningkatan kompetensi sumber daya manusia 9. Peraturan Menteri ESDM Nomor 12 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemanfaatan Sumber Energi Terbarukan
untuk Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik dan Peraturan Menteri Nomor 43 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan
yang meliputi pengetahuan, keahlian dan atas Permen ESDM Nomor 12 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemanfaatan Sumber Energi Terbarukan untuk
Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik;
pengalaman 10. Peraturan Menteri ESDM Nomor 39 Tahun 2017 tentang Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Fisik Pemanfaatan
Energi Baru dan Energi Terbarukan;
11. Beberapa Peraturan Menteri Keuangan tentang insentif fiskal dan non fiskal pengembangan EBT.
3 4
KEMENTERIAN ESDM KEMENTERIAN ESDM
II. Potensi Energi Baru Terbarukan II. Target Penyediaan Energi Primer EBT Tahun 2025
Air Surya Panas Bumi
Berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 22 Tahun 2017 tentang
Potensi :
75 GW + 19,3 GW
Potensi : 207,8 GWp Potensi
Sumber Daya : 11,0 GW Rencana Umum Energi Nasional (RUEN)
Kapasitas Pembangkit Listrik Nasional 135 GW
Realisasi
Realisasi Reserve : 17,5 GW
PLTA 5,124 GW
PLTS 0,085 GWp
(0,02%) Realisasi Kapasitas Pembangkit Listrik EBT 45 GW
PLTMH 0,162 GW PLTP 1,65 GW
(1,19%) (0,36%) Batubara Gas
Bioenergi Laut 1. PLT Panas Bumi, 7,2 GW
Angin 22% Listrik 2. PLT Hidro, 17,9 GW
Potensi : 60,6 GW Potensi Potensi : 17,9 GW 3. PLT Mikrohidro, 3 GW
Realisasi
PLTB :1,1 MW
PLT Bio : 32,6 GW
BBN : 200 Ribu Bph 69,2 EBT 45 4.
5.
PLT Bioenergi, 5,5 GW
PLT Surya, 6,5 GW
(0,0002%) Realisasi
30% ~ 400 MTOE GW 6. PLT Angin, 1,8 GW
PLT Bio : 1,78 GW (0,4%) 23% 7. PLT EBT lainnya, 3 GW
MTOE
EBT
92,2
Cadangan
Energi Fosil Produksi Akan habis 8,80 GW MTOE
Terbukti
441,7 GW (2% terhadap potensi) 25% Biofuel 13,69
juta kilo liter
Minyak Bumi 3,6 miliar barel 288 Juta barel 13 tahun
Biomassa 8,4
Gas Bumi 100,3 TSCF 2,97 TSCF 34 tahun Kapasitas terpasang Minyak 23,0 juta ton
Batubara 7,2 miliar ton 434 juta ton 16 tahun
Pembangkit saat ini 59.656 MW MTOE
Biogas 489,8
juta m3
Rencana 35.000 MW New project
CBM 46,0
mmscfd
Pembangunan Pembangkit +7.500 MW
5 6
KEMENTERIAN ESDM KEMENTERIAN ESDM
F-2
SIEP Final Report – January 2018III. Pengembangan Energi Terbarukan berdasarkan RUPTL III. Roadmap Panas Bumi (1/2)
Wilayah Sumatera Wilayah Kalimantan Berdasarkan RUPTL 2017 – 2026 PT. PLN Persero 8,000.0 3000
No Pembangkit Listrik Kapasitas Total No Pembangkit Listrik Kapasitas Total Kapasitas Terpasang (per Juli 2017) : Indonesia
Total Indonesia
1 Panas Bumi MW 3.305 1 Panas Bumi MW - 1.698,5 MW Penambahan kapasitas peringkat ke-1
No Pembangkit Listrik Kapasitas Total 7,000.0
2 Air MW 4.284 2 Air MW 1.056 terpasang 2017 terdiri dari: dunia melampaui
2500
3 Mini/Mikro Hidro MW 983 3 Mini/Mikro Hidro MW 10 1 Panas Bumi MW 6.290 1.PLTP Ulubelu Unit 4 (55 MW) (COD Amerika
4 Surya MWp 5 4 Surya MWp - 6,000.0
25 April 2017) Indonesia
2 Air MW 12.343
2.PLTP Karaha Unit 1 (30 MW) peringkat ke-2
5 Bayu MW - 5 Bayu MW 15
Tambahan Kapasitas (MW)
3 Mini/Mikro Hidro MW 1.694 3.PLTP Sorik Marapi (Modular, 20 MW)
Rencana Kapasitas (MW)
dunia melampaui 2000
6 Biomas/ Sampah kota MW 274 6 Biomas/ Sampah kota MW 41 4 Surya MWp 57 5,000.0 4.PLTP Sarulla Unit 2 (110 MW) Filipina
7 Laut MW - 7 Laut MW -
5 Bayu MW 570
8 Bio-Fuel Ribu KL 411 8 Bio-Fuel Ribu KL 830
6 Biomas/ Sampah kota MW 597 4,000.0 1500
Total MW 8.851 Total MW 1.257
7 Laut MW 0
1,175
8 Bio-Fuel Ribu KL 6.572
3,000.0 999
Total MW 21.549 866 858 1000
2,000.0 650
Wilayah Jawa-Bali 450
Wilayah Sulawesi & Nusa Tenggara Wilayah Maluku & Papua 500
No Pembangkit Listrik Kapasitas Total
No Pembangkit Listrik Kapasitas Total No Pembangkit Listrik Kapasitas Total 1,000.0 205 215 165 220
1 Panas Bumi MW 2.150 110
1 Panas Bumi MW 400 1 Panas Bumi MW 75 60
2 Air MW 4.562 0 37 7.5 35
2 Air MW 2.323 2 Air MW 118
- 0
3 Mini/Mikro Hidro MW 437
3 Mini/Mikro Hidro MW 221 3 Mini/Mikro Hidro MW 43
4 Surya MWp -
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
4 Surya MWp 52 4 Surya MWp -
5 Bayu MW 250
5 Bayu MW 170 5 Bayu MW - Rencana Kapasitas Tambahan Kapasitas
6 Biomas/ Sampah kota MW 206
6 Biomas/ Sampah kota MW 21 6 Biomas/ Sampah kota MW 55
7 Laut MW -
7 Laut MW - 7 Laut MW -
*Asumsi: Filipina (1.870 MW) dan Amerika (3.450 MW) tidak mengalami penambahan kapasitas
8 Bio-Fuel Ribu KL 439
8 Bio-Fuel Ribu KL 4.423 8 Bio-Fuel Ribu KL 469
Total MW 7.965
Total MW 3.186 Total MW 290
7 8
KEMENTERIAN ESDM KEMENTERIAN ESDM
III. Roadmap Mandatori BBN (2/2) IV. Perizinan dan Non Perizinan
ROADMAP BIODIESEL (Minimum) 1. Ditjen EBTKE telah mengelola 6 jenis perizinan dan 25 jenis non perizinan.
Sektor April 2015 Januari 2016 Januari 2020 Januari 2025 2. Penyederhanaan perizinan telah dilakukan dengan pelimpahan 3 perizinan
Usaha Mikro, Usaha Perikanan, Usaha Pertanian, 15% 30% 30% dilaksanakan oleh BKPM antara lain:
20%
Transportasi, dan Pelayanan Umum (PSO) 1. Penugasan Survei Pendahuluan Panas Bumi
Transportasi Non PSO 15% 30% 30% 2. Izin Panas Bumi
20%
3. Izin Penggunaan Gudang Bahan Peledak Panas Bumi
Industri dan Komersial 15% 20% 30% 30%
3. Penyederhanaan non perizinan telah dilakukan dengan pelimpahan 1 non perizinan
Pembangkit Listrik 25% 30% 30% 30% yang dilaksanakan oleh BKPM, penghapusan 9 non perizinan dan saat ini dalam
proses penghapusan 8 non perizinan lainnya.
4. Ditjen EBTKE tetap mengelola 3 jenis perizinan dan 7 jenis non perizinan.
Implementasi Biodiesel
28
26
25 P : 3 ke BKPM
24 NP : 1 ke BKPM
22
20 9 dihapus
18
16 8 dalam proses dihapus
14
12
10
8 6 7
B2 – B7,5 B10 B15 B20 6
4
3
2
0
Awal Akhir
Perizinan (P) Non Perizinan (NP)
9 10
KEMENTERIAN ESDM KEMENTERIAN ESDM
IV. Insentif Fiskal dan non Fiskal (1/2) IV. Insentif Fiskal dan non Fiskal (2/2)
No. Tax Allowance Bea Masuk Pendanaan No. Tax Allowance Bea Masuk Pendanaan
1. Peraturan Pemerintah No. 1 Tahun 2007 jo. PP Keputusan Menteri Keuangan No. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. PMK Nomor 89/PMK.010/2015 mengatur tata Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. -
No. 62 Tahun 2008 jo. PP No.52 Tahun 2011 766/1992 memberikan fasilitas berupa 139/PMK.011/2011 mengatur tata cara cara pemberian fasilitas pajak penghasilan 021/PMK.011/2010 memberikan fasilitas
memberikan fasilitas berupa pengurangan PPh impor barang operasi oleh Pengusaha pemberian jaminan kelayakan usaha PT. untuk penanaman modal di bidang usaha perpajakan dan kepabeanan untuk
netto 30% dari nilai investasi selama 6 tahun, untuk keperluan Pengusahaan sumber Perusahaan Listrik Negara (Persero) 4. tertentu dan/atau di daerah tertentu serta kegiatan pemanfaatan sumber energi
penyusutan dan amortisasi dipercepat. daya Panasbumi tidak dipungut Bea untuk pembangunan pembangkit tenaga pengalihan aktiva dan sanksi bagi wajib pajak terbarukan
masuk, Pajak Pertambahan Nilai, Pajak listrik dengan menggunakan energi badan dalam negeri yang diberikan fasilitas
Penjualan atas Barang Mewah dan terbarukan, batubara, dan gas yang pajak penghasilan.
Pajak Penghasilan. dilakukan melalui kerjasama dengan PMK Nomor 268/PMK.03/2015 mengatur tata Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. -
pengembang listrik swasta. cara pemberian fasilitas dibebaskan dari 70/PMK.011/2013 Perlakuan Pajak
2. PMK Nomor 144/PMK.011/2012 memberikan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan -No. pengenaan pajak pertambahan nilai atas impor Pertambahan Nilai dan Pajak Penjualan
fasilitas pajak penghasilan untuk penanaman 78/PMK.010/2005 memberikan fasilitas 03/PMK.011/2012 yang mengatur tata dan/atau penyerahan barang kena pajak atas Barang Mewah atas Impor Barang
5.
modal di bidang-bidang usaha tertentu pembebasan bea masuk atas impor cara pengelolaan dan tertentu yang bersifat strategis dan tyata cara Kena Pajak Yang Dibebaskan dari
dan/atau di daerah-daerah tertentu berupa barang untuk kegiatan pengusahaan pertanggungjawaban fasilitas dana panas pemnbayaran pajak pertambahan nilai barang Pungutan Bea Masuk
pengurangan PPh netto 30% dari nilai investasi Panas Bumi berdasarkan kontrak bumi geothermal. kena pajak tertentu yang bersifat strategis yang
selama 6 tahun, penyusutan dan amortisasi sebelum berlakunya UU No. 27 Tahun telah dibebaskan serta pengenaan sanksi
dipercepat 2003 tentang Panas Bumi.
3. PMK Nomor 159/PMK.010/2015 memberikan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. -
fasilitas pengurangan pajak penghasilan badan 177/PMK.011/2007 memberikan fasilitas
paling banyak 100% dan paling sedikit 10%. Pembebasan bea masuk atas impor
barang untuk kegiatan usaha hulu
minyak dan gas bumi serta panas bumi.
11
11 12
12
KEMENTERIAN ESDM KEMENTERIAN ESDM
F-3
SIEP Final Report – January 2018V. Upaya Pengembangan Panas Bumi (1/3) V. Upaya Pengembangan Bioenergi (2/3)
Penugasan kepada BUMN
Pemerintah akan memberikan penugasan kepada BUMN Panas Bumi dalam rangka pengembangan hulu 1. Mandatori Bahan Bakar Nabati B-20 (80% Solar, 20% Biodiesel),
dan hilir panas bumi berdasarkan UU 21 tahun 2014
2. Biogas Nasional, Non Komersial (Investasi Pemerintah) dan Semi Komersial (Penerapan
Subsidi Parsial)
Penugasan Survei Pendahuluan + Eksplorasi
Investor yang memenuhi persyaratan memiliki kesempatan untuk mendapatkan Penugasan Survei 3. Pengembangan Bioenergi Berbasis Hutan, Bekerjasama dengan Kementerian
Pendahuluan hingga tahap eksplorasi. Sebagai insentif wilayah kerja akan dilelang melalui mekanisme Kehutanan, merupakan Pencadangan kawasan hutan produksi yang khusus diperuntukan
penunjukan langsung
untuk pembangunan hutan energi sebagai sumber bahan baku bioenergi
Pengeboran Eksplorasi oleh Pemerintah & Geothermal Fund 4. Pulau Ikonis Energi Terbarukan (Sumba Iconic Island), Penyediaan sumber energi
Mengoptimalkan pemanfaatan dana Geothermal Fund sebesar USD 300 juta yang dikelola oleh PT. SMI baru terbarukan di Pulau Sumba, NTT sebesar 100% pada tahun 2025.
untuk melakukan eksplorasi sebelum pelelangan WKP. Hal ini juga sebagai upaya mitigasi risiko untuk
menurunkan risiko kegagalan dalam pengembangan panas bumi. 5. Biomassa Untuk Listrik, Pembangunan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Biomassa dengan
Pelelangan WKP Indonesia Timur menggunakan bahan baku limbah biomassa dan sampah kota
Pemerintah akan fokus melakukan pelelangan WKP di wilayah Indonesia Timur khususnya di daerah yang
memiliki BPP setempat lebih tinggi dari BPP Nasional
13 14
KEMENTERIAN ESDM KEMENTERIAN ESDM
V. Upaya Pengembangan Aneka EBT (3/3) VI. Tantangan
1. Mendorong prioritas pengembangan Aneka EBT:
Jangka pendek 1-3 tahun: PLTS (5.000 MW), PLTM/ PLTMH dan PLTB; 1. Penyamaan pola pikir dalam pengembangan EBTKE masih
Jangka menengah 4 – 7 tahun: Pengembangan PLTA, PLT Gasifikasi Batubara
(PLTGB), PLT Gelombang Laut (PLTGL);
perlu ditingkatkan;
2. Upaya pemerataan energi melalui penyediaan akses energi modern dengan EBT 2. Skema bisnis dan Insentif belum optimum;
melalui Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK);
3. Penyusunan Road Map Aneka EBT bidang Energi Samudera, Hidro, Surya, Angin, 3. Teknologi masih tergantung dari Luar Negeri (TKDN kecil);
Batubara Tergaskan dan Nuklir;
4. Penyusunan SNI dan SKKNI bidang Aneka EBT.
4. Harga relatif masih mahal;
5. Potensi/Cadangan perlu diperbaharui;
6. Skala kecil dan tersebar;
7. Sistem Interkoneksi masih terbatas;
8. Masih terdapat resistensi masyarakat.
15 16
KEMENTERIAN ESDM KEMENTERIAN ESDM
VI. Kemitraan Strategis
Menyusun regulasi dan kebijakan;
Fasilitator;
Memberikan pembinaan dan pengawasan;
Government Melakukan pengusahaan EBTKE;
Melaksanakan program di bidang EBTKE;
Memproduksi EBTKE;
Diseminasi informasi program EBTKE;
Berkontribusi dalam penerimaan negara dan
Pemerintah wajib mengembangkan sumber daya EBT
kegiatan ekonomi.
dan meningkatkan efisiensi energi
Academy EBTKE Bussiness
www.esdm.go.id
Melakukan inovasi teknologi sekaligus
menyiapkan inkubator untuk komersialisasi Berperan aktif dalam mendorong pemanfaatan
Melakukan survei dan kajian potensi EBTKE EBTKE;
Melakukan kajian kebijakan terutama Sebagai penerima manfaat, ikut berkontribusi
bagaimana memanfaatkan hasil riset dalam menjaga keberlanjutan pemanfaatan
Melakukan kajian teknologi sebelum EBTKE;
dikembangkan pemerintah Ikut berkontribusi dalam diseminasi informasi
Bersama-sama meningkatkan TKDN Community
pemanfaatan EBTKE.
Mendorong transfer teknologi informasi
17 18
KEMENTERIAN ESDM KEMENTERIAN ESDM
F-4
SIEP Final Report – January 2018Upaya ke Depan Bauran Energi Primer
Bauran Energi Primer 2016 Bauran EBT meningkat rata-rata 0,54% setiap tahun
Upaya khusus dan strategi untuk pencapaian target EBT
antara lain: 7.7%
%
8
7.7
23.9% EBT 7
1. Melakukan sosialisasi untuk penyamaan pola pikir stakeholder 34.6%
Batubara 6
dalam pengembangan EBTKE; Minyak Bumi 5
33.8% Gas Bumi 4
2. Mendorong prioritas pengembangan: 3
• Jangka pendek 1-3 tahun: mendorong PLT Bioenergi (PLTBg 1000MW, 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Tahun
PLTBm 1000MW), PLTS (5000MW) dan PLTB;
bauran energi primer (sbm)
• Jangka menengah 4 – 7 tahun: pengembangan panas bumi, PLTA No. Jenis EBT
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 *)
3. Penugasan kepada BUMN (PT. PLN Persero dan PT. Pertamina 1.
EBT LISTRIK
EBT NON LISTRIK
48.184.711
1.262.264
49.766.625
2.032.075
51.684.252
3.786.792
60.680.698
5.932.075
66.732.677
10.443.396
73.497.500
5.179.245
75.655.946
17.150.943
Persero); BATU BARA
% 4,4%
281.400.000
4,3%
334.142.760
4,5%
377.892.961
5,2%
406.368.974
6,4%
321.597.105
6,7%
364.619.216
7,7%
416.666.804
2.
4. Penyempurnaan iklim investasi melalui penyediaan insentif dan MINYAK BUMI
% 25,1%
518.405.561
28,0%
546.635.311
30,8%
533.830.676
31,6%
542.950.370
26,5%
544.795.076
31,2%
444.807.454
34,6%
407.624.859
kemudahan prosedur; 3.
GAS BUMI
% 46,3%
269.942.185
45,8%
261.708.332
43,5%
259.456.414
42,2%
270.134.751
44,8%
271.375.371
38,1%
279.632.345
33,8%
288.546.809
4.
5. Bekerjasama dan berkolaborasi dengan investor Internasional TOTAL
% 24,1%
1.119.194.721
21,9%
1.194.285.103
21,2%
1.226.651.095
21,0%
1.286.066.868
22,3%
1.214.943.625
23,9%
1.167.735.760
23,9%
1.205.645.361
dan institusi bilateral/multilateral. % 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Keterangan:
- *) Angka revisi/ final;
- EBT non listrik adalah pemanfaatan biodiesel;
- Sumber Data Energi Primer Batubara, Minyak Bumi & Gas Bumi dari Handbook of Energy & Economic Statistics of Indonesia, Pusdatin.
19 20
KEMENTERIAN ESDM KEMENTERIAN ESDM
Program Andalan Pengarusutamaan EBTKE
1. Penyusunan Regulasi EBTKE;
2. Penyediaan energi listrik yang ekonomis;
3. Mandatori Bahan Bakar Nabati B-20 (80% Diesel, 20% FAME); Program
Hutan Energi.
4. Pemerataan energi melalui Penyediaan Akses Energi Modern dengan EBT
seperti PLTP, PLTMH, PLTS, PLTB, PLTBg, PLTSa dan Penerangan dengan
Lampu Tenaga Surya Hemat Energi (LTSHE) untuk desa belum berlistrik;
5. Percepatan Pembangunan PLTP melalui:
1. Penugasan ke BUMN/BLU;
2. Penugasan Survei Pendahuluan + Eksplorasi;
3. Pengeboran eksplorasi oleh Pemerintah.
6. Mandatori Efisiensi Energi kepada Bangunan Pemerintah, BUMN dan Industri;
Program Kampanye Potong 10%.
21
KEMENTERIAN ESDM
F-5
SIEP Final Report – January 2018Realisasi Investasi
FDI
PMA DDI
PMDN Target
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Target Realisasi Investasi
Up Date Kebijakan Investasi Mendorong Pembangunan (dalam Miliar USD) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total
2010-14
2015 2016
2017
(SMT 1)
2018* 2019*
Total
2015-19*
Pembangkit Listrik Energi Baru Terbarukan PMA
PMDN
16.4
6.7
19.5
8.4
24.6
10.2
28.6
13.6
28.5
14.5
117.6
53.5
29.3
14.4
28.9
15.8
15.6
9.6
38.1
22.9
43.8
27.9
171
98.6
Total Realisasi 23.2 27.9 34.8 42.2 43.0 171.0 43.6 44.7 25.2 61.0 71.8 269.7
Disampaikan pada FGD Percepatan Investasi Energi Terbarukan, Kemenko Bidang Perekonomian
• 2010-2012, Nilai Tukar 1 USD = Rp 9,000 *nilai tukar 1 USD = IDR 13,000.-
• 2013 (Q I and Q II), Nilai Tukar 1 USD = Rp 9,300 (berdasarkan APBN 2013)
Deputi Bidang Perencanaan Penanaman Modal, BKPM • 2013 (Q III and Q IV), Nilai Tukar 1 USD = Rp 9,600 (berdasarkan APBN 2013)
• 2014 (QI-QIII) Nilai Tukar 1 USD = Rp 10,500 (berdasarkan APBN 2014)
Tamba P. Hutapea • 2014 (QIV) Nilai Tukar 1 USD = Rp 11,600 (berdasarkan APBN-P 2014)
• 2015 Nilai Tukar 1 USD = Rp 12.500 (berdasarkan APBN-P 2015) 2
• 2016 Nilai Tukar 1 USD = Rp 13.900 (berdasarkan APBN-P 2016)
Jakarta, 31 Juli 2017 The Investment Coordinating Board of the Republic of Indonesia
2
© Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal, 2017
Prioritas Investasi Rencana danRealisasi Investasi Sektor Ketenagalistrikan
Sektor Prioritas Investasi
TOTAL KAPASITAS Rencana Proyek EBT (2009 – 2016)
Program RENCANA PEMBANGKIT EBT (MW)
24 Pelabuhan
Infrastruktur Ketenagalistrikan
Laut
35 GW 2009 - 2016 PMDN
18%
Perkebunan
Pertanian Tanaman Pangan
Jagung
Sapi
PLTS
PLTSA
Makanan & 39,192 PMA
Industri Padat Karya Tekstil Furnitur Mainan PLTP 3,162 PLTBg dan PLTBm
Minuman 82%
1,426 10
Industri Substitusi Kimia & Farmasi Besi & Baja PMA : USD 61,59 Miliar
Impor PLTMH PMDN : USD 13,69 Milliar
19.442 PLTA, Total: USD 75,28 Milliar
Minyak Kelapa 188,483
Produk Kayu,
Alat Elektronika Sawit & Produk Otomotif
Industri Industri Berorientasi Turunannya
Pulp, & Kertas
Ekspor
PLTM Realisasi Proyek EBT (2009 – 2016)
212,321
Ikan & Produk
Mesin Produk Karet Udang
Turunannya
PLTB
1,562
Industri Hilir Sumber Cokelat Gula
Batubara PMDN
PMA
Daya Alam (Smelter) PLTAL 45%
PLTBm 15 55%
PLTBg
1.916 14.442
Penyimpanan
Industri Kemaritiman Galangan Kapal Pemancingan
(Cold Storage) Catatan:
PLTS: Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Surya PLTB: Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Bayu/Angin PPMA : USD 1,75 Milliar
Kawasan Pariwisata, Kawasan Kawasan PLTSa: Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Sampah PLTAL: Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Arus Laut PMDN : USD 1,43 Milliar
15 Kawasan Total : USD 3,18 Milliar
Ekonomi Khusus dan Kawasan Pariwisata MICE 8+11 KEK
Industri Baru
PLTBg: Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Biogas
PLTBm: Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Biomassa
PLTM: Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Minihidro
PLTMH: Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Mikrohidro
Industri Strategis PLTA: Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Air PLTP: Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Panas Bumi
The Investment Coordinating Board of the Republic of Indonesia The Investment Coordinating Board of the Republic of Indonesia
3 4
Perbaikan Pelayanan Investasi
BKPM telah menyempurnakan layanan One-Stop Service /PTSP Pusat
Satu
Pintu Proses perizinan untuk penanaman modal asing, antar provinsi, dan strategis:
22
All Pengajuan Izin Pengajuan Insentif
4 Pengajuan Izin
Kementerian/
sectors Lembaga 3-hour 1 2
128 izin
terintegrasi
Izin Investasi 3
Prinsip Bisnis Bisnis
didelegasikan Jam PTSP PUSAT PTSP PUSAT PTSP PUSAT
kepada BKPM
Insentif Unit Terkait Kegiatan bisnis bisa
PTSP pusat meliputi
Tarif Import Perpajakan segera dimulai
perwakilan dari 22
Industri, Pelayanan Kementerian/Lembaga Tax Allowance
Tax Holiday
Kementerian Keuangan
Kementerian Keuangan
ketenaga-
listrikan,
3-hour Terpadu Satu
PTSP pusat
O&G Recommendation Kementerian Perdagangan,
minyak & PTSP Pusat Izin Investasi menyelenggaran layanan Kementerian ESDM
untuk Sektor proses izin 3 jam
gas bumi,
pariwisata
BKPM Infrastruktur Pintu (PTSP) Izin pemanfaatan hutan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan
Fasilitas KLIK pada 32 Kehutanan
satu pintu
Pusat BKPM kawasan industri & KEK
Pengajuan Izin Operasi
3
90%
PTSP Daerah
KLIK
PTSP Daerah
telah terbentuk. Kemudahan *Syarat & Ketentuan berlaku
Jenis Izin Unit Terkait
61% PTSP Investasi Izin Lokasi PTSP Daerah Regional/Kota
Daerah
menerapkan e- 17,238 Langsung
Konstruksi
Izin Konstruksi PTSP Daerah Regional/Kota
licensing Izin diterbitkan Sertifikat Lahan Pertanahan Regional/Kota
dalam Jan-Des
2015 Izin Lingkungan Regional Environment Office
HO (Hinderordonnantie) PTSP Daerah Regional/Kota
The Investment Coordinating Board of the Republic of Indonesia Source: BKPM The Investment Coordinating Board of the Republic of Indonesia
5 6
F-6
SIEP Final Report – January 2018You can also read
