Teaching for Democracy: Fostering Civic Engagement and Understanding - EPFP Alumni Webinar - February 25, 2021
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Teaching for Democracy: Fostering Civic Engagement and Understanding EPFP Alumni Webinar – February 25, 2021
Technical Tips • To listen to the audio, make sure your computer or headphone speakers are turned ON and the volume is adjusted to your preference. • To view the chat box, press the “Chat” icon that looks like a word bubble at the bottom of your screen on the black ribbon. • Questions can be entered into the Q&A box • A closed captioning icon will appear on the bottom black bar of your screen. Click to show captioning. • Exit full screen mode (top right button or “View Options” drop down menu) • Enable Side-by-side Mode (“View Options” drop down menu) • Click on Speaker View to only see the current presenter’s video or Gallery View to see all panelists’ videos (top right button) ***This session is being recorded. Live captioning is available. Recording will be available at https://epfp.iel.org/page/webinarseries
Dr. Brian Shoup Dr. Paula McAvoy Natacha Scott Assistant Professor of Assistant Professor, College of Director of Educator Political Science and Public Education, NC State University Engagement, iCivics Administration, Co-Director, Civic Life Lab, Mississippi State University
CIVIC LIFE, POLARIZATION, AND ENGAGEMENT IN 2021 AMERICA IEL Alumni Webinar February 25, 2021 Dr. Brian Shoup
Disclaimers ■ Civil speech is not a panacea. ■ Civility has at times been used to exclude, rather than include. ■ Civil speech is a counterfactual … … but a valuable orienting ideal. ■ There is a difference between polarization (wide disagreements about policy preferences) and disagreements based on the fundamental rejection of facts.
Civil vs. Uncivil Speech ■ Civil speech is … ■ Uncivil speech is … – Inclusive – Polarized – Procedurally fair – Oversimplified – Responsible – Crisis-focused – Self-skeptical – Singular in perspective – Issue-driven – Identity-driven
Rebuilding Main Street • Collaborative game • 4-10 players • Skills taught: • Deliberation • Civil cooperation • Balance of individual goals with public good
Frameworks for Civil Speech “We don’t have demagoguery in our culture because a demagogue came to power; when demagoguery becomes the normal way of participating in public discourse, then it’s just a question of time until a demagogue arises.”
Civil Speech in Action ■ Seek opportunities for deliberation ■ Practice empathy and perspective-taking ■ Avoid assuming worst intentions or interpretations ■ Avoid zero-sum thinking ■ Disagree with curiosity, not hostility ■ Listen actively, engage respectfully
the Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education
A Roadmap for Excellence in History and Civics for All Learners
5 Design Challenges How can we help students understand the full context for their role as 1 civic participants without creating paralysis and a sense of insignificance? How can we integrate the perspectives of Americans from all different 2 backgrounds in narrating our history (e pluribus versus unum)? How can we acknowledge that from its inception, Americans have simultaneously disagreed about the ideal shape of self-government while 3 also ultimately agreeing to preserve shared institutions? How can we narrate our country’s history in a way that is honest about the past without falling into cynicism and appreciative of its founding 4 without tipping into adulation? How can we support instructors in helping students move between 5 concrete, narrative, and chronological learning, and thematic, abstract or conceptual learning?
EAD Pedagogy Civic Participation Transformations
Question & Answer
BEFORE YOU GO… please fill out our quick feedback form Link: https://survey.alchemer.com/s3/6215681/EPFP-Webinar-Teaching-for- Democracy-Fostering-Civic-Engagement-and-Understanding
You can also read