TAKING THE MYSTERY OUT OF MAID - JULIE CAMPBELL, NP WILLI KIRENKO, NP COPYRIGHT - DO NOT USE WITHOUT PERMISSION - THAMES VALLEY FAMILY HEALTH TEAM
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Taking the Mystery Out of MAiD Julie Campbell, NP Willi Kirenko, NP (Copyright – do not use without permission
Faculty/Presenter Disclosure • Presenter: Julie Campbell and Willi Kirenko Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) • Relationships with commercial interests: – Grants/Research Support: N/A – Speakers Bureau/Honoraria: N/A – Consulting Fees: N/A – Other: N/A
Disclosure of Commercial Support • This program has received financial support from no organizations. • This program has not received in-kind support from organizations. • Potential for conflict(s) of interest: • The speakers have received no payment/funding from any organizations supporting this program.
Presentation Objectives • Understand & integrate ethical principles & legal/regulatory requirements in the care of patients requesting MAiD • Evaluate how organizational policies influence the experience of patients requesting MAiD • Access support for self & support for patients &families • Identify challenges patients have experienced in their request for MAiD & explore ways to reduce barriers to access • Discuss with patients options for care delivery including home based & organizational based MAiD
The Legislation • On June 17, 2016, the federal government passed Bill C-14 which outlined requirements that patients must meet to be eligible to receive MAiD, & establishes safeguards that must be followed to legally provide MAiD • On May 10, 2017, Ontario's MAiD Statute Law Amendment Act, 2017, came into force – It provided greater clarity & legal protection for health care providers & for patients navigating MAiD – It also established a new role for the coroner in overseeing assisted deaths
Who is eligible for MAiD in Canada? 1.Eligible for publicly funded health services in Canada 2. At least 18 years of age and capable of making decisions with respect to their health 7
Who is eligible for MAiD in Canada? 3. “Grievous and irremediable medical condition” = all of the following: • A serious and incurable illness, disease or disability • In an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability • The illness, disease or disability or that state of decline causes enduring physical or psychological suffering that is intolerable and cannot be relieved under conditions that they consider acceptable • Natural death has become reasonably foreseeable, taking into account all of their medical circumstances, without a prognosis necessarily having been made as to the specific length of time that they have remaining.
Who is eligible for MAiD in Canada? 4.Voluntary request, no external pressure 5. Informed consent, and counseling regarding other means available to relieve their suffering, including palliative care
‘Reasonably Foreseeable’ Natural Death • CAMAP guideline: – Clinicians should be aware that Bill C-14 makes MAID an end-of-life option for individuals whose natural deaths are reasonably foreseeable. – As an aid to clarity, clinicians can consider interpreting “reasonably foreseeable” as meaning “reasonably predictable” from the patient’s combination of known medical conditions and potential sequelae, whilst taking other factors including age and frailty into account. – Clinicians should not employ or support rigid timeframes in their assessments of eligibility for MAID. Bill C-14 contains no requirement for a prognosis having been made as to the length of time the patient has remaining.
Conscientious Objection & Making an Effective Referral (Ontario) CPSO CNO • Where physicians are • An NP should consider their unwilling to provide … care ability to provide these for reasons of conscience or services early in the process religion, an effective referral to support timely access to to another HCP must be care provided to the patient • NPs who do not personally • An effective referral means a provide medical assistance timely referral made in good in dying must refer the faith to a non-objecting, client who requests this to available, and accessible MD, another NP or physician NP or agency who provides this service
MAiD is NOT Collaboration • MAID is the only part of medicine that is not a collaborative decision between the NP & patient • It’s not about what we think, it is solely a patient’s decision • No longer having a meaningful quality of life is the primary motivation for wanting quality of death
Does Choosing MAiD Mean We’ve Failed in Some Way? • No, it means the patient is experiencing suffering that cannot be relieved under conditions that they consider acceptable • They get to decide when they’ve suffered enough
Meet Joe • Joe Gartune, age 87 • Lives in a hospital palliative care unit • Widowed with two adult children • Diagnosed with prostate cancer (Gleason score 9) 8 months ago • Depression following death of spouse in 2012 • Metastases to liver and bone • Has lost 80 lbs since diagnosis • Total care • No delirium or confusion to date
Poll How many people think Joe qualifies? - YES/NO
Joe’s Pathway • Joe’s care provider Dr. X is a conscientious objector & Joe currently resides in a faith- based facility • Dr. X gives Joe’s son the number to refer Joe to the Provincial Care Coordination Service 1 1-866-286-4023 • Information about Joe’s condition and providers is collected • NP at the CCS reviews Joe’s file and connects with a MAiD assessor and/or LHIN • LHIN ensures care plan for all other care is up to date and establishes plan if necessary 2 for supportive nursing agency care • MAiD assessor ensures Joe knows about & has completed Form A (Patient Request Form) • MAiD assessor completes Form B (provider) or Form C (assessor) & associated note 3
Joe’s Pathway • A second assessor gets involved (they were likely asked to be an assessor by the other assessor, the LHIN or the CCS) 4 • 2nd assessor completes the Form B or Form C and an associated note • Patient / provider select a date – discuss details of patients wishes • Orders sent by provider to LHIN for peripheral IV access x 2 and for 5 medications from pharmacy • Procedure Day (in this case discharge home) MAiD provider calls Provincial Coroners Office. Nurse Investigator calls back to talk to provider & family • Death certificate is completed and paperwork sent to Coroners office 6 • Nursing provides after care as is routine in EDITH
Legal Criteria • Grievous and Irremediable Medical Condition – Prostate cancer with mets, no longer a treatment candidate • Advanced stage of irreversible declining capability – Late stages of cancer, requires complete ADL support • Enduring physical and psychological suffering – Pain is controlled, rapid weight loss, fatigue and weakness along with loss of independence and dignity. This is not tolerable to the patient • Death has become reasonably foreseeable – Likely course would be death with ongoing wasting & cardiorespiratory arrest • Voluntary request – Request made without external pressure/coercion. Children are supportive • Informed Consent – Joe understands his illness is not curable, he understands the result of MAiD is his death. His depression was situational and managed & he exhibits no signs that he is currently influenced by depression. He has decided he wants to be in control of the end of his life and understands he must have capacity to do so. He is aware he can rescind his request at any time • Formal Request in writing – Joe has signed and completed the Form A on April 2, 2018. He is aware of the 10 day reflection period and that he can rescind his request at any time. He is aware of the role of the Coroner
Meet George • George Clipper, age 96 • Lives in a Retirement Home x 8 years • Requires assistance for all ADLs, two sons assist with care 10 hours per day plus assisting him to bed + PSW support • Reports full body itch causing “excruciating pain” x 7 years. No Rx, home remedies or considerations for environmental causes have provided relief • Last year he rode his scooter out on trails, now he has difficulty getting to the dining room for meals and mostly stays in his room • Successful businessman x 50 years, “happy life, wonderful family” • Euthymic and seated comfortably throughout assessment with easy humor and logical flow to conversation • Meds: Pantoprazole 40mg od, Metoprolol 25mg BID, Apixaban 25mg BID, Terazosin 1mg hs, Hydroxyzine 10mg hs
Poll How many people think George qualifies? - YES/NO
George’s Pathway • George’s provider Dr. B isn’t confident that he meets the eligibility criteria so Dr. B calls the SW LHIN and speaks with the Care Coordinator who links Dr. B in with the 1 MAiD Navigator • LHIN ensures care plan for all other care is up to date and establishes plan if necessary for supportive nursing agency care 2 • MAiD assessor ensures George knows about & has completed Form A (Patient Request Form) 3 • MAiD assessor completes Form B (provider) or Form C (assessor) & associated note
George’s Pathway • A second assessor gets involved • 2nd assessor completes the Form B or Form C and an associated note 4 • Patient / provider select a date – discuss details of patients wishes • Orders sent by provider to LHIN for peripheral IV access x 2 and for 5 medications from pharmacy • Procedure Day MAiD provider calls Provincial Coroners Office. Nurse Investigator calls back to talk to provider & family • Death certificate is completed and paperwork sent to Coroners office 6 • Nursing provides after care as is routine in EDITH
Legal Criteria • Grievous and Irremediable Medical Condition – Frail (Rockwood 8-9) • Advanced stage of irreversible declining capability – Advancing decline with steep trajectory over past year, assistance with all ADLs • Enduring physical and psychological suffering – Chronic intractable itch x 7 years that has not responded to any treatment • Death has become reasonably foreseeable – Requires constant care • Voluntary request – Request made without external pressure or coercion. Children have indicated their support • Informed Consent – George understands the result of MAiD is his death. He understands he must have capacity to consent at time of procedure. He is aware he can rescind his request at any time • Formal Request in writing – George has signed and completed the Form A. He is aware of the 10 day reflection period and that he can rescind his request at any time. He is aware of the role of the Coroner.
Meet Stacy • Stacy Lamage, Age 54 • Lives with husband and 12 year old son • Dx: Multiple myeloma • Confirmed by abnormal labs, skeletal survey & bone marrow biopsy • With treatment prognosis is fair (median 3 years but some 10 years) • Treatable but not curable • Declines any treatment other than analgesics • Two ED admissions within 3 months for hypercalcemia crisis • Very private couple & not sharing plan with anyone (even medical care team)
Poll How many people think Stacy qualifies? - YES/NO
Stacy’s Pathway • Stacy self-refers to Provincial Care Coordination Service and does not give permission for anyone to contact her medical team because of fear of pressure to accept treatment 1 • Limited information about Stacy’s condition and providers is collected • NP at the CCS reviews Joe’s file and connects with a MAiD assessor • Stacy declines any other involvement in her care. 2 • Clinical notes are found on Clinical Connect and at Stacy’s request through hospital medical records department • MAiD assessor ensures Stacy knows about & has completed Form A (Patient Request Form) • MAiD assessor completes Form B (provider) or Form C (assessor) & associated note 3
Stacy’s Pathway • A second assessor gets involved • 2nd assessor completes the Form B or Form C and an associated note 4 • Patient / provider select a date – discuss details of patients wishes • Orders sent by provider to LHIN for peripheral IV access x 2 and for 5 medications from pharmacy • Procedure Day MAiD provider calls Provincial Coroners Office. Nurse Investigator calls back to talk to provider & family 6 • Death certificate is completed and paperwork sent to Coroners office
Legal Criteria • Grievous and Irremediable Medical Condition – Life-limiting disease with bone pain, weakness, nausea, & hypercalcemia • Advanced stage of irreversible declining capability – Advancing decline with steep trajectory over past few months with hypercalcemia • Enduring physical and psychological suffering – Pain, weakness, nausea & hypercalcemia – NOT required to accept treatment • Death has become reasonably foreseeable – At high risk for death due to hypercalcemia crises • Voluntary request – Request made without external pressure or coercion. Husband assisting with support • Informed Consent – Stacy understands the result of MAiD is her death. She understands she must have capacity to consent at time of procedure. She is aware she can rescind his request at any time • Formal Request in writing – Stacy has signed and completed the Form A well in advance. She is aware of the 10 day reflection period and that she can rescind his request at any time. She is aware of the role of the Coroner
What makes MAiD similar to any other death in the home? MAiD at Home “Natural” Death at Home DNR- C and EDITH completed DNR C and EDITH completed Care planning, coordination and provision by Care planning, coordination and provision by H&CC H&CC Palliative care provided Palliative Care provided Patient request form and 2 assessments by None independent, non-objecting providers Ensure nursing support is provided by non- Nursing support by any organization objecting organizations Patient selects time and date of death MAiD procedure – usually 2x PIV, medications accepted by nursing or brought by provider, procedure completed, medication picked up by pharmacy After care & support provided After care & support provided
Reducing Barriers • Patients experience many barriers to their request for MAiD – Many hospices or faith based institutions require dying patients to be transported off-site for MAID assessment or provision – Delays in obtaining MAiD assessments are common if supporting medical information is not sent from MRPs. – Patients are often influenced by the views of providers – Organizational processes are sometimes barriers – Informal network of providers and assessors
Effect on Providers • Dr. Marg McKee & Dr. Megan Sellick studied the impact on physicians who provided MAiD. – “profoundly positive, meaningful, even life- transforming for the providers” – Study identified administrative & institutional obstacles as the major sources of stress
Around the World • From 2001 – 2013 assisted dying rates in Belgium have increased from 1 – 4% due to an increased number of patient requests and higher granting rates of physicians • Belgium has no evidence to support a ‘slippery slope’ or that euthanasia is applied to ‘vulnerable’ groups
Connecting Patients • Provincial Care Coordination Service – 1-866-286-4023 – 24/7 365 days per year – Patient information, clinician support, links to regional resources • South West LHIN – Coming soon….one number for clinicians – questions, advice, navigation, mentorship opportunities etc.. - julie.campbell@lhins.on.ca
Thank You! Questions or Comments? We would be pleased to connect any time: juliemaycampbell@gmail.com Willi@Kirenko.com
You can also read