Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs - A virtual seminar series

Page created by Vincent Stewart
 
CONTINUE READING
Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs - A virtual seminar series
Strategies to support the
COVID-19 response in LMICs
A virtual seminar series
Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs - A virtual seminar series
Therapeutics Landscape for
COVID-19
Natasha Mubeen Chida, MD MSPH
Associate Program Director, Infectious Disease Fellowship Program
Assistant Professor, Division of Infectious Diseases
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs - A virtual seminar series
Objectives
• Review biological plausibility of Remdesivir for SARS-CoV-2 treatment
• Review clinical data on Remdesivir
• Review biological plausibility of Hydroxychloroquine for SARS-CoV-2
  treatment
• Review clinical data on Hydroxychloroquine
• Discuss cytokine release syndrome in COVID-19
• Discuss use of anti IL-6 blockade for management of CRS
• State ongoing clinical trials for Remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, IL-6
  blockade
Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs - A virtual seminar series
Sample of COVID-19 Therapeutic
 Landscape
          Antivirals             Immune Modulators        Other
          Baloxavir                   Anakinra          ACEI/ARB
Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine   Convalescent Plasma   Ascorbic Acid
           DAS-181                 Corticosteroids     Azithromycin
          Favipiravir                   IVIG           Epoprostenol
          Interferon                 Lenzilumab        Indomethacin
      Lopinavir/Ritonavir            Ruxolitinib        Ivermectin
   Neuraminidase inhibitors          Sarilumab         Niclosamide
          Remdesivir                  Sirolimus        Nitazoxanide
          Ribavarin                  Tocilizumab          Statins
         Umifenovir                 Acalabrutinib
Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs - A virtual seminar series
SARS-CoV-2

    Liu C, et al. ACS Cent Sci. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00272 (2020). Jiang S, Hillyer C, Du L. Trends Immunol doi: 10.1016/j.it.2020.03.007 (2020).
Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs - A virtual seminar series
“Antivirals”
Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs - A virtual seminar series
Remdesivir
• 2013 Ebola outbreak
   • CDC/USAMRIDD/Gilead Sciences identified
     nucleoside lead à prodrug, RDV
   • Metabolized to active form, adenosine nucleoside
     analog
      • Interferes with RNA polymerase
          • Evades viral exoribonuclease proofreading
          • Decrease in RNA production

• In cell/animal models efficacious in MERS-CoV,
                                                                                                                   Remdesivir
  SARS-CoV, Marburg, Nipah, more
• IV formulation

                         Warren TK, et al. Nature. 2016;531(7594):381-5. Sheahan TP, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(396).
Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs - A virtual seminar series
Remdesivir
• Clinical trials
• Compassionate use: pregnant women/children
• Expanded access protocol
Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs - A virtual seminar series
Remdesivir Clinical Trials: Examples
Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs - A virtual seminar series
Remdesivir Clinical Data
• Report of patients Jan-
  March-61 patients à 53
   • 40 (75%) received the full 10-day
     course of Remdesivir
   • 34 (64%) ventilated at baseline
      • Median duration of ventilation
        prior to Remdesivir 2 days [IQR 1-8]

               Grein J, et al. N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007016 (2020).
Remdesivir Clinical Data
• 18 days
   • 36 (68%) showed improvement in oxygen support
   • 57% ventilated patients extubated
• Most recent follow up
   • 25 (47%) discharged
   • 7 (13%) died
      • 6 (18%) of those ventilated, 1(5%) not ventilated

                          Grein J, et al. N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007016 (2020).
Remdesivir Clinical Data
• 23% serious adverse events

                    Grein J, et al. N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007016 (2020).
Lopinavir/Ritonavir
• In-vitro activity against SARs-CoV, MERS-CoV
        • Hypothesis: inhibition of SARs/MERS protease
• Benefit in retrospective studies in SARs-CoV
        • Some in vitro data SARS-CoV-2, but EC50 much
          higher than levels reached in HIV dosing
                 • HIV protease different protease family                                                                                Lopinavir/ritonavir
                 • Optimized to fit in a specific part of the catalytic site
                   of HIV protease, absent in coronaviruses
                 • Some benefit in animal studies MERS-CoV
        • Widely used in China
                 • Numerous retrospective studies

Li G, De Clercq E. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(3):149-150., Yao TT, et al. J Med Virol. doi: 10.1002/jmv.2572 (2020)., Jiang S, Hillyer C, Du L. Trends Immunol doi: 10.1016/j.it.2020.03.007 (2020)., Choy KT et
                                                                          al. Antiviral Res. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104786 (2020).
Lopinavir/ritonavir Data

                                                                                                      • Post hoc analysis suggesting early
                                                                                                        treatment may be efficacious

        Cao B, et al. N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282 (2020). , Ye XT, et al. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(6):3390-339
Lopinavir/ritonavir Clinical Trials:
Examples

                         Clinicaltrials.gov
Chloroquine Mechanisms Against
SARS-CoV-2
• Blocks viral infection by increasing
  endosomal pH required for virus-
  cell fusion
• Interferes with glycosylation of
  SARS-CoV cellular receptors
• Chloroquine interferes with entry
  and post-entry stages of SARS-
  CoV-2 infection in Vero E6 cells

  Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
                 Wang M et al. Cell Research (2020) 30:269–271; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0. Vincent MJ et al. Virol J. 2005 Aug 22;2:69.
Chloroquine Mechanisms Against SARS-
CoV-2
• Vero E6 cells infected with SARS-
  CoV-2 at MOI 0.05
• Efficacy evaluated by quantification
  of viral copy numbers in cell
  supernatant by RT-PCR, confirmed
  with visualization of virus
  nucleoprotein expression through
  immunofluorescence microscopy at
  48h post-infection
• EC90 = 6.90 μM (clinically achievable)
  Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
                          Wang M et al. Cell Research (2020) 30:269–271; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0.
CQ versus HCQ in vitro
• Cytotoxicity in VeroE6 cells measured
• HCQ less potent than CQ at some MOI

Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD

                          Liu J et al. Cell Discovery ( 2020) 6:16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-020-0156-0
Hydroxychloroquine Clinical Data
(Preprint)
• Randomized, parallel-group trial                                    • Retinal disease
• Inclusion criteria:                                                 • Heart block
                                                                      • Severe liver disease, including AST
   •   Age ≥18y                                                         >2x ULN
   •   SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive                                     • Pregnant or breastfeeding
   •   Chest CT with pneumonia                                        • eGFR ≤30 or RRT
   •   SaO2:SpO2 >93% or PaO2:FiO2
       >300 mm Hg

• Exclusion criteria:
   • Severe, critical illness
  Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
                           Chen Z. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758
Hydroxychloroquine Clinical Data
(Preprint)
• 62 patients                                                 • Outcomes
   • 47% men                                                         • Time to clinical recovery = afebrile
   • Mean age 44.7y ±15.3                                              and cough relief ≥72h
                                                                     • Chest CT d0 vs d6
• All received standard therapy
                                                                     • Initially planned PCR and T-cell
   • Oxygen                                                            recovery data not reported
   • Antiviral and antibacterial agents
   • Immunoglobulin ± corticosteroids • HCQ: 9 no fever, 9 no cough
• Randomization to HCQ 200 mg                                 • Control: 14 no fever, 16 no cough
  BID x5d vs standard treatment

 Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
                          Chen Z. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758
Hydroxychloroquine Clinical Data
(Preprint)
• Fever duration shorter with HCQ (2.2 ± 0.4d vs 3.2 ± 1.3d)
• Cough duration shorter with HCQ (2.0 ± 0.2d vs 3.1 ± 1.5d)
• More patients had radiographic improvement with HCQ [25/31 (81%)
  vs 17/31 (55%), p=0.05]
• All 4 patients who progressed to severe illness were in control group
• 2 patients with mild adverse reactions in HCQ group (rash, HA)

 Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
                          Chen Z. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758
Hydroxychloroquine Clinical Data
• 30 patients at a single center in China • No difference in primary endpoint
• Randomized to HCQ 400 mg daily x5d + between groups
  conventional treatment or                      • 13/15 (87%) cases negative in HCQ group,
                                                   14/15 (93%) in control group
  conventional treatment only
    • Both groups received interferon        • No difference in time from
    • Most received umifenovir or lopinavir/   hospitalization to negative NP swab,
      ritonavir                                fever resolution, radiographic findings,
• Primary endpoint: negative NP swab 7d diarrhea or abnormal liver enzymes
  after randomization

 Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
                       Chen J. J Zhejiang University. 2020:[Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.03.03.
  https://www.ashp.org/-/media/assets/pharmacy-practice/resource-centers/Coronavirus/docs/ASHP-COVID-19-Evidence-Table.ashx. Accessed 13 April 2020.
HCQ + Azithromycin
• Open-label, non-randomized trial in France
• Patients aged ≥12y with NP SARS-CoV-2 carriage on admission
   • Excluded: retinopathy, G6PD deficiency, QT interval prolonged, pregnancy
• HCQ 200 mg TID x10d ± azithromycin 500 mg x1 then 250 mg QD x4d
   • Controls: untreated patients from another center, patients refused protocol
• NP swab VL measured daily
• End point: presence of virus at day 6 post-inclusion

  Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
               Gautret P and Lagier JC et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949
HCQ + Azithromycin
• 36* patients
   • Mean age 45.1 ± 22y
   • 42% (15/36) men
   • 4.0 ± 2.6d between symptom onset & inclusion
• Clinical characteristics
   • 8 patients with LRTI symptoms (all had evidence of pneumonia by CT scan)
   • 22 patients with URTI symptoms (rhinitis, pharyngitis, fever, myalgia)
   • 6 asymptomatic patients

  Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
               Gautret P and Lagier JC et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949
HCQ + Azithromycin
• At day 6 post-inclusion:
  • 70% HCQ-treated patients
    (vs 12.5% controls) tested NP
    RT-PCR negative
  • 100% HCQ + azithromycin-
    treated patients (vs 57%
    patients treated with HCQ
    monotherapy) tested NP RT-
    PCR negative

 Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
              Gautret P and Lagier JC et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949
HCQ + Azithromycin
   • One patient treated with HCQ + azithromycin tested RT-PCR negative
     at day 6 and then positive at day 8
   • Patients treated with HCQ + azithromycin had lower viral RNA loads
     at treatment initiation than HCQ and control groups
   • Sites other than the primary site did not perform daily PCR testing
           • 38% of data for control group imputed (vs 5% for treatment group)
   • 6 treated patients omitted from analysis owing to ICU transfer (3),
     death (1), hospital discharge (1), nausea (1)

        Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
Gautret P and Lagier JC et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949. Kim AHJ, Sparks JA et al. Ann Intern Med. Doi:10.7326/M20-1223
HCQ + Azithromycin
• 11 consecutive patients
   • 7 men, 4 women
   • Mean age 59y (range 20-77)
   • 8 with significant comorbidities
• HCQ 600 mg daily x10d + azithro 500 mg x1 then 250 mg QD x4d
• At treatment initiation, 10/11 had fever and were receiving oxygen
• Within 5d, one patient died, two transferred to ICU
• One course discontinued after 4d (QT 405 → 460-470)
• NP RT-PCR positive in 8/10 patients at 5-6d after treatment initiation

  Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
                Molina JM et al. Medecine et Maladies Infectieuses (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2020.03.006
HCQ + Azithromycin
• Case series of 80 patients at one institution
   • All patients treated with HCQ 200 mg TID + azithromycin 500 mg x1 then 250 mg QD for ≥3d
     & followed for ≥6d included
   • Excluded: QTc >500 ms, ECG suggesting channelopathy
• HCQ 200 mg TID x10d ± azithromycin 500 mg x1 then 250 mg QD x4d
   • Ceftriaxone added for pneumonia and NEWS score ≥5
• NP swab VL measured ~daily by RT-PCR
• Primary end points:
   • Clinical outcome, including O2 therapy or ICU transfer after ≥3d treatment
   • Contagiousness as assessed by PCR and culture
   • Length of inpatient stay

  Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
             Gautret P and Lagier JC et al. https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/COVID-IHU-2-1.pdf
HCQ + Azithromycin
• 80 patients                                                       • Clinical characteristics
   • Median age 52.5y (IQR 42-62)                                          •   54% LRTI symptoms
   • 52.5% (42/80) men                                                     •   41% URTI symptoms
   • 57.5% at least one chronic                                            •   5% asymptomatic
     condition                                                             •   15% had fever
   • 4.9 ± 3.6d between symptom onset                                      •   92% low NEWS score (0-4)
     & treatment initiation

 Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
            Gautret P and Lagier JC et al. https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/COVID-IHU-2-1.pdf
HCQ + Azithromycin
• 15% (12/80) received O2
• 81% (65/80) discharged
• 17% (14/80) still hospitalized
• 4% (3/80) transferred to ICU
• 1% (1/80) died
• Mean time from initiation to
  hospital discharge 4.1d
   • Mean LOS 4.6d

  Slide courtesy Michael Melia, MD
             Gautret P and Lagier JC et al. https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/COVID-IHU-2-1.pdf
HCQ Clinical Trials: Examples
          Name/Sponsor             Pertinent Characteristics         Estimated completion

ACTG 5396                     Hospitalized                     Pending

ACTG 5395                     Outpatients                      Pending

Multiple Prophylaxis trials   HCWs or household contacts       Ongoing

SOLIDARITY/WHO                8. Hospitalized                  March 2020-2022

DISCOVERY/INSERM              9. Hospitalized                  March 2020-2023
On the Horizon
          Antivirals             Immune Modulators        Other
          Baloxavir                   Anakinra          ACEI/ARB
Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine   Convalescent Plasma   Ascorbic Acid
           DAS-181                 Corticosteroids     Azithromycin
          Favipiravir                   IVIG           Epoprostenol
          Interferon                 Lenzilumab        Indomethacin
      Lopinavir/Ritonavir            Ruxolitinib        Ivermectin
   Neuraminidase inhibitors          Sarilumab         Niclosamide
          Remdesivir                  Sirolimus        Nitazoxanide
          Ribavarin                  Tocilizumab          Statins
         Umifenovir                 Acalabrutinib
“Antiviral” Key Points
• Remdesivir has biological plausibility and in vitro data to support its
  candidacy as a SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic agent
   • Clinical trial data forthcoming
• Lopinavir/ritonavir has minimal supportive in vitro data in SARS-CoV-2
   • Current clinical data does not support its candidacy as a SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic
     agent
   • Clinical trial data forthcoming
• In patients with non-severe disease, and as part of multi-component
  therapy, HCQ may:
   • Be associated with shorter durations of fever and cough
   • Be associated with radiographic improvement
• Inadequate data to comment on impact of HCQ on viral RNA shedding
Anti IL-6 Agents
COVID-19 Cytokine Release Syndrome
• Similar to CRS seen in CART-T Therapy
   • Driven by IL-6
   • Anti IL-6 blockade: Tocilizumab utilized
• Like in CAR-T therapy, appears to be characterized by
   •   Fever
   •   Blood pressure abnormalities
   •   Progressive respiratory decline
   •   Elevation of certain inflammatory laboratories
• ARDS ≠ Cytokine Release Syndrome

                                Mehta P, et al. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1033-1034.
CRS

      Moore BJB, June CH. Science. doi: 10.1126/science.abb8925
                               (2020).
COVID-19 Clinical Course

                Zhou F, et al. Lancet. 2020395(10229):1054-1062.
Observational Cohorts: Published
• Retrospective observational study of
  15 patients admitted to a hospital in
  China
   • Classified into moderately ill (13%),
     seriously ill (40%), critically ill (47%)
   • Median age 73 [IQR 62-80]
• Heterogeneous dosing, timing
• Half received methylprednisolone

                             Luo P, et al. J Med Virol. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25801 (2020).
Observational Cohorts: Published
• 3 patients died (20%)
• When in clinical course did
  patients receive
  tocilizumab?
• Were they ARDS or
  developing signs of CRS?

       Luo P, et al. J Med Virol. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25801 (2020).
Observational Cohorts: Preprint
• Retrospective observational
  study of 21 patients with proven
  COVID-19 admitted to 2 hospitals
  in China
   • Defined as
       • Severe: RR ≥ 30 breaths/min, SpO2 ≤
         93% on ambient air, PaO2/FiO2 ≤
         300 mmHg
       • Critical: Mechanical ventilation,
         shock, organ failure requiring ICU
         admission
   • Patients received standard of care
     + tocilizumab
       • Standard of care = lopinavir/
         ritonavir, methylprednisolone,
         oxygen

                             Xu X, et al. http://www.chinaxiv.org/abs/202003.00026 (Accessed 4/19/2020).
Observational Cohorts: Preprint
• 19% discharged at time of paper
  submission
• Based on this data National Health
  Commission of China included
  tocilizumab in COVID-19 therapy
  recommendations
• When in clinical course did patients
  receive tocilizumab?
• Were they ARDS or developing
  signs of CRS?

                                         Xu X, et al. http://www.chinaxiv.org/abs/202003.00026 (Accessed 4/19/2020).
Observational Cohorts: Preprint
• 21 patients with COVID-19 and ARDS in Italy
   •   Using noninvasive ventilation
   •   Part of Siltuximab compassionate use program
   •   Median age 64 years [IQR 48-75]; 18 (85.7%) men
   •   Median IL-6 139.5 pg/mL, CRP 23.4 mg/dL
   •   Comorbidities
        • Hypertension: 9 (42.3%)
        • Diabetes 5: (23.8%)
        • Cardiovascular disease 4 (19.1%)
• Median 3 days hospitalization prior to siltuximab

                     Gritti G, et al. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.01.20048561v2.full.pdf. Accessed 4/20/20
Observational Cohorts: Preprint

          Gritti G, et al. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.01.20048561v2.full.pdf. Accessed 4/20/20
Themes Of Current Clinical Data
• Outcome related to tocilizumab or natural history
• Heterogeneity in patients
• Variability in clinical course
• Variability in administration
   • Dosing
   • Timing of administration
• Concomitant use of other agents/anti-inflammatories
• Heterogeneous outcomes
Anti IL-6 Clinical Trials: Examples

  >7 more trials between China, Europe
Anti IL-6 Key Points
• Some patients with COVID-19 may develop a syndrome similar to the
  cytokine release syndrome seen in CAR-T therapy
   • Characterized by specific clinical findings and inflammatory laboratories
• There is a paucity of reliable published data
• Clinical trial data forthcoming
• Anecdote: early administration appears more effective than late in
  the course of illness
Convalescent Plasma
• In the US, IND
   • Clinical trials,                                        Convalescent Plasma

     expanded access,
     emergency individual
     use              Chen Z. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/
                                   10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758
• Current data: Case
  reports/series
• Limitations: Plasma
• Study launching at JHH
Objectives
• Review biological plausibility of Remdesivir for SARS-CoV-2 treatment
• Review clinical data on Remdesivir
• Review biological plausibility of Hydroxychloroquine for SARS-CoV-2
  treatment
• Review clinical data on Hydroxychloroquine
• Discuss cytokine release syndrome in COVID-19
• Discuss use of anti IL-6 blockade for management of CRS
• State ongoing clinical trials for Remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, IL-6
  blockade
You can also read