Sustainable shipping Innovation day and Baltic Business Meeting Point, Karlskrona May 4th, 2018 - Webflow
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Our story started in 1939 …when a young Sten A. Olsson left A few years later he bought his In 1962 ferry services began between the island of Donsö, to start first ship – and named it after Gothenburg and Skagen in Denmark. trading scrap metal in Gothenburg. his son, Dan. Stena AB and Stena Metall In the 1980s Stena AB Today, almost half of Stena’s AB were separated 1972. expanded into areas such business is land based. as offshore and property.
Stena Line at a glance 5,500 21 38 300 EMPLOYEES FERRY ROUTES VESSELS ENERGY SAVING PROJECTS INITIATED (since 2005) 1,3 2 1,5 7 BILLION EURO MILLION MILLION MILLION IN TURNOVER FREIGHT UNITS CARS PASSENGERS
Shipping facilitates trade and prosperity 180 % 135 % Increase in world GDP in Increase in world seaborne the last two decades trade over the same period abt. 90% of world trade travels by sea
Global shipping - opportunitites • Backbone of global trade • Contributes to better living standards • Unlimited capacity on the oceans • Low cost infrastructure • Energy efficient • Safe • Punctual • Releave road congestion • Tourism and travel • Employ abt 1.5 mill seafarers
Global shipping – risks and challenges Industry challenge Mitigations • Emissions to air • Global rules and regulations • Major Accident • Law enforcement • Pollution/spills • Transparency • Sabotage • Awareness in business decision • Piracy • Readiness and training • Transparency • Systems and procedures • Dedicated employees • Safety and environment polices • Equality • Dialogue with customers, NGO • Ship recycling and society • Partners/Subcontractors CSR • Goodwill and Strong brand • Corruption and other crimes • Commitment
The single biggest challenge of today Muscles Wind Coal Oil
Maintaining shipping as the ‘greenest’ mode of transport 10000 Aviation 1000 EEOI in gCO2 per t.km 100 Road Shipping Rail 10 1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 Average payload tonnes Graph stolen from Tristan Smith UCL Energy Institute
CO2 from shipping CO2 from shipping (Gt) Representing abt 1000 42 36 39 2,5% of global CO2 900 78 78 emissions 800 73 700 600 Slow growth 500 2013 910 (Gt) 400 801 813 812 2014 930 300 2015 932 200 100 0 2013 2014 2015 International Domestic Fishing SOURCES: ICCT, 2017. Greenhouse gas emissions from global shipping, 2013–2015
Regulations are increaseing IMO ambition IMO ambition to reduce IMO carriage North Sea to reduce total GHG EEDI & EU HAZMAT IMO 4th ban on non- and Baltic CO2/transport emissions SEEMP EU MRV BWMC in place GHG study compliant fuels NECA (-80%) work with 40% by 50% 2013 2018 2019 2020 2020 2020 2021 2030 2050 2015 2018 2019 2020 2020 2021 2023 2050 SECA North IMO initial IMO DCS Global sulphur IMO action Baltic Sewage IMO final IMO ambition Europe 0,1% GHG strategy cap 0,5% plan on GHG strategy to reduce plastic litter CO2/transport work with 70%
The main elements of the Initial GHG Strategy • Vision to phase-out of GHG emissions as soon as possible in this century consistent with the Paris Agreement temperature goal; • Ambition introduces an emission cap by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008; • Requires that CO2 emissions per transport work reduce by at least 40% by 2030, pursuing efforts towards 70% by 2050; • Levels of ambition should take into account update emission estimates of the IPCC (UN climate body); • All measures will apply equally to all ships of all flags; • Recognises the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities; • Determines the timelines for finalisation and agreement of measures: • short term (2018-2023) • mid-term (2023-2030) • long-term (beyond 2030); • Notes that technology innovation and the global introduction of alternative fuels and/or energy sources for international shipping will be needed to achieve the overall ambition; • Allows emissions to peak as soon as possible. • 4th IMO GHG study in 2020. Final strategy 2023 • Working group on GHG suggest follow up programme/action to MEPC73 in October.
Example from an operator : Stena Line’s approach
Through care for each- Focus areas We shall relentlessly other and an absolute strive to improve in commitment to safety, energy efficiency on Stena Line shall actively shore and at sea - and promote the well being actively stimulate the of our guests and staff. usage of cleaner energy sources. Health & Well-being Clean Energy Life below water Responsible Consumption We rely on the ocean for We care for resources by of our company’s responsible purchasing existence and as such and by every year shall have minimal reducing waste and impact on marine life increasing recycling. from our operations.
Result targets and selected initiatives 2017 Area Target Status Action Methanol project finalized. ESP celebrated 300th -2.1% 2017 Reduce CO2 emission per nm -2,5% per year (Sox -15%) completed project. 6 month punctuality campaign. New battery project, MRV reporting Terminals offering ships green Trelleborg connected 2017. 25% in 2020 17% in 2017 electricity connections (OPS) Oslo to be connected in 2018. Fredrikshavn/Kiel TBA. Reduction of plastic bags and Phase out to sustainable Bags from renewable Paper bags launched Q1 -18. New bins and waste signage disposables on-board. alternatives material in place available for ships/terminals. +2,5% recycled 72,8% recycled 2017 Improving monthly reporting through a new share-point. Recycle all waste 68% recycled 2016 waste per year (material and energy) New ISO14001:2015 certification Q4 incl. 7 core ports. New Last minute risk assessment, Stop the job policy and LTIF – lost time injury frequency 1,2 in 2017 0,6 in 2017 Personal Safety Handbook launched. BRM training for officers 2017/18. New measurement Accidents per 100,000 guests Below relevant competition NMF Passenger Safety Campaign 2,1 in 2017 Use of eco-label chemicals Min 50% in 2017 Abt 60% end Q1 2018 Upgrade of OSS products ongoing Five small spills in 2017. Spills to water 0 5 in 2017 All scrubber sludge pumped ashore. RESPONSIBLE GOOD HEALTH CLEAN LIFE CONSUMPTION & WELL-BEING ENERGY BELOW WATER
Stena Line CO2 emissions trend CO2 ton/nm 0,600 Total gross CO2 emissions 1,35 0,550 mill mt + 5,8% Less 2,1% per nm (Nautical MT CO2miles +7,9%) gross 0,539 2017 1600000 1550000 0,520 1500000 0,509 1450000 1372470 0,505 1400000 1 347 837 0,500 1350000 0,495 1300000 1250000 1295628 0,484 1200000 1274376 0,478 1150000 1100000 0,470 2014 2015 2016 2017 0,450 Yearly ton CO2/nm 0,400 Linear -2,5% yearly reduction target 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CO2/nm - 2.1 % Close to target in spite higher utilization, 4 scrubbers and more trips. Punctuality on positive trend, continued focus on efficiency and ESP NOx/nm + 3,0 % Maintenance of SCR’s on Stena Jutlandica/Germanica/Scandinavica SOx/nm - 15,3 % Mainly due to low-sulphur bunker used on Irish Sea North’s RoRo ships
Clean energy initiatives • Efficiency • Technical - Energy Saving Program • Operational – Digital & Behaviour On-shore power supply • OPS – Shore side electricity • First installation 1990 - today 13 out of 38 • Alternative fuel/power vessels and 5 terminals equipped. • Methanol / LNG • Digital Energy & Savings Allows shuttingBehaviourProgram down (ESP)while in Aux engine • Electricity WorldsStarted Increasing port, in 2005 firstreducing vessel use of digital noice, totoolstofor emissions conversion air and if 5green better dedicated methanol/diesel analysis staff electricity and decision reduce propulsion CO2 making – • ETAInstallation 300 Upgraded pilot, completed cost on Fuel 2015 during sixthe shipby Management projects weeks, abt. 2017€ 400-500 System, conversion k. On finalized Small Sea shore inTraffic 2017. and largeabt. €700 Management – 1,000 – LED-lights k.to and project • Mandatory Budget in someEU abt €11 million. ports, not possible in support. propellers. Punctuality measurments. most.operation reduce SOx, particles (PM) Methanol Strong • about Electricity contributor to - 2,5% /nm with 90%prices and NOx andwith tax vary about greatly 60%. inCan yearly Bridge Europe emission Resource - bunker target. Management prices are the same andall over. be renewably produced. • various Using OPS Infrastructure training isreduce for CO2 relatively safety asand emissions simple with 13 is methanol efficiency. 000fuel. a liquid tons/year. Currently operating both diesel and methanol.
Important steps in the methanol project SPIRETH – evaluation EU support Supply Regulatory work Bunkering station Big interest and of two methanol granted for agreement with IMO IGF–code built on quayside recognition from concepts Methanex and Class in Gothenburg marine industry PILOT Methanol 2012 2014 2014 2015 2016 2013 2009 2013 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 EffShip Conversion Conversion kit Risk analyses in Q1 shipyard Engines converted 4 engines Alternative candidate developed by the Ports upgrade to methanol converted fuels identified Wärtsilä Remontowa one at a time compared, methanol a candidate
Next: electricity – not new to shipping Some 130 years ago on the Spree River in Berlin, Siemens tested its first electric boat, which was intended to operate as a kind of water taxi back in 1886. The Elektra could carry 25 passengers at a speed of 8 knots. HH Ferries Ampere
Step 1 : Containerized Energy Storage System • First step in company long term battery plan. • Installation Q2 2018 of Energy Storage System of about 1 MWh capacity and 3MW power. • This solution could fit any ship. No limit of deck area. • Charging by green electricity in port (30 mins) and by ships aux engines. Stena Jutlandica - Built 1996 (RoPax) Passenger capacity 1,500 • The ESS system to be used as Lanemeters 2,750 182,5 m LOA 28 m beam • Replace two aux engines to power bow thrusters during About 1,400 voyages / year maneuvering Aux engines 4*1,540 kW • Peak shaver for aux engines at normal seagoing operation • Safety back-up to prevent black-outs in narrow waters • It will lower emission, noise and maintenance + add goodwill. • Total investment €2,5 mill. Supported by EU and Swedish Swedish Transport Administration. • Suppliers Corvus + Callenberg Technology Group. • Potential saving of 1,500 mt CO2/year.
Step 2: ME Plug-in hybrid • Conversion of existing diesel-mechanical vessel Stena Jutlandica. • Battery operation replacing 2/4 main engines. • For operation in port area and coastal areas up to 10 nm. • Optimise use of main engines under operation (Peak shaving), reduce noise and emissions to air – especially in Stena Jutlandica - Built 1996 (RoPax) urban areas. Passengers 1,500 Lanemeters 2,750 • Battery capacity about 20 MWh (Lithium jon) with 8MW Main engines 4*MAN 9L48/54 tot. 25,920 kW. power. • Remove existing 50% of the diesel power and add 8 MW electric drive - or keep existing arrangement and add 8 MW electric drive to the propeller shaft. • Charging in abt. one hour with 10MW shore side electricity (currently max 2,5 MW). • Budget estimated €25 mill. Can save up to 50% of emissions. • Potential start 2020/2022
Step 3 : Full electric • Full electric short-sea RoPax. • Conversion or more likely N/B. • Battery capacity of 50 MWh, charging in 2-3 hours with 10 MW. • Operation range of about 50 nautical miles. • Ambition for 2030 - a fossil free route Göteborg-Fredrikshavn. • When a capacity and range of about 60 nm is achieved about 5-6 of Stena Lines 21 routes can potentially be electrified. • Supporting initiatives: • Minor stakeholder in future battery producer “Northvolt” Short routes with potential in falling order • R&D on battery recycling through Stena Recycling Cairnryan – Belfast 40nm 2 ship • Participation in Swedish Electric Mobility Lab Gothenburg – Fredrikshavn 52nm 2 ship Fishguard – Rosslare 58nm 1 ship Trelleborg – Sassnitz 62nm 1 ship Holyhead – Dublin 62nm 2 ship Varberg – Grenå 65nm 1 ship 9 out of 38 ships – 24%
So - energy savings OK but new type of fuels are necessary
A multifuel future Stena’s view is that we have to face a fuel mosaic as different ship types need different solutions depending on size, age and trade. There will also be increased competition with other transportations segments. • In a 10-15 year perspective HFO with scrubber and Marine Gas Oil will still be the most used fuels for ships due to their cost effectiveness. • LNG will be a suitable bridge fuel for new built ships in areas were fuel logistics are well developed. • Methanol/ethanol can be developed as a step towards fossil free shipping. • Wind, electric hybrids and other contributors to lower emissions will increase sharply in the near term. • Fully battery powered ships will be an attractive alternative for short sea shipping 10-15 years from now. Distances less than 100nm (?). • In a longer perspective bio fuels, ammonia and fuel cells will enter the market.
What is needed to get the change started ?
Thank you for listening
You can also read