Research and Data Symposium for Food and Nutrition - Effective oral presentation of data-driven research
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Research and Data Symposium for Food and Nutrition Effective oral presentation of data-driven research Patrick Webb 4 March 2021 1
Strategic thematic areas (STAs) and key result areas (KRAs) KRA 1.1: Generating information and evidence s KRA 1.2: Facilitating technology adaptation and adoption Research and KRA 1.3: Developing new technologies and knowledge Development KRA 1.4: Enhancing access to research facilities KRA 1.5: Laboratory facilities dedicated to national policy priorities KRA 2.1: Enhancing policy analysis and formulation Policies, KRA 2.2: Facilitating policy advocacy legislation, and KRA 2.3: Promoting standards and regulations standards KRA 2.4: Establishing appropriate legislation KRA 2.5: Continuous active engagement with CODEX KRA 3.1: Facilitating growth in trade and commerce in priority aflatoxin-prone commodities KRA 3.2: Creating incentives that encourage positive behaviors with respect to aflatoxin management Trade and health KRA 3.3: Ensuring compliance with non-tariff barrier rules KRA 3.4: Streamlining public health objectives with trade instrument use KRA 3.5: Negotiate standards setting and dispute resolutions through WTO mechanisms KRA 4.1: Risk assessment to inform decision making KRA 4.2: Competency and infrastructure for aflatoxin testing Enhancing KRA 4.3: Improving capacity of value chain actors, and civil society organizations capacity KRA 4.4: Ensuring health practitioner capacity enhancement KRA 4.5: Institutional and laboratory capabilities obtained dedicated investment KRA 5.1: Increasing public awareness, information sharing and knowledge Public awareness, KRA 5.2: Improving policy and political will through targeted communication advocacy, and KRA 5.3: Mass media campaign design KRA 5.4: Ensuring social media uptake of key messages communication KRA 5.5: Monitoring and assessment of awareness raising pathways KRA 5.6: Advocacy at consumer, producer and policy maker levels
1. Preparing content a. How to capture audience attention/connect with their interests? b. How to structure main messages. c. Choice of data visualizations. 2. Planning what you'll say (or not say) a. How to manage time while presenting? b. How to emphasize main messages? c. What to listen for when watching a presentation? 3. Varied approaches for different audiences a. What is style of communication for operational agencies, Congress or global science committees? b. Has COVID changed any of the above? Chat room, background. 4
1. Preparing content a. How to capture audience attention/connect with their interests? b. How to structure main messages. c. Choice of data visualizations. a. Depends on type of presentation: a. Single presenter webinar – you’re the focus b. Lightening talk panel – you’re competing for attention c. Conference oral paper – you’re grandstanding Only 2 key elements really matter! i) What’s new here? ii) Why should you care? 5
1. Preparing content a. How to capture audience attention or connect with their interests? b. How to structure main messages. c. Choice of data visualizations. b. Its all about time available: Use 7 mins or 70 mins to get your message(s) across clearly and coherently. Some presenters like conclusions on first slide, others work up to conclusions. Don’t pad slides with content you can say. Maybe use concise text interpretation alongside complex visuals. 6
The food system accounts for ~28% of global greenhouse gas emissions (2007- 2016) What we choose to eat has huge implications for what is produced, how, and its footprint. Source: Created using data from World Resources Institute (2016) and IPCC (2019)
1. Preparing content a. How to capture audience attention or connect with their interests? b. How to structure main messages (e.g., balancing text length, clarifying terminology, etc.). c. Choice of data visualizations. c. Its all about ‘picture worth 1,000 words’: Does a visual ‘explain’ complex relationships better than the data, or your words? Are you able orally to explain the complexity behind a simple visualization? Can the visual stand-alone? It should be able to convey message without explanation. 8
Use of CRISPR gene editing technology across agriculture, medical and industrial applications, by country. CRISPR = "clusters of regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats." Jon Cohen Science 2019;365:420-421
John Snow’s Broad Street pump analysis of 1854 Date # of Fatal Attacks Deaths Date # of Fatal Attacks 8/ 19 1 1 9/9 11 24 8/20 1 0 9/10 5 18 8/21 1 2 9/11 5 15 8/22 0 0 9/12 1 6 8/23 1 0 9/13 3 13 8/24 1 2 9/14 0 6 8/25 0 0 9/15 1 8 8/26 1 0 9/16 4 6 8/27 1 1 9/17 2 5 8/28 1 0 9/18 3 2 8/29 1 1 9/19 0 3 8/30 8 2 9/20 0 0 8/31 56 3 9/21 2 0 9/1 143 70 9/22 1 2 9/2 116 127 9/23 1 3 9/3 54 76 9/24 1 0 9/4 46 71 9/25 1 0 9/5 36 45 9/26 1 2 9/6 20 37 9/27 1 0 9/7 28 32 9/28 0 2 9/8 12 30 * 9/29 0 1 9/20 0 0 * pump handle removed Source: Snow (1855) On the Mode of Communication of Cholera (2nd ed.) London: John Churchill.
2. Planning what you'll say (or not say) a. How to manage time while presenting? b. How to emphasize main messages? c. What to listen for when watching a presentation? a. Its all about the clock: Stopwatch better than digital clock. Practice to finish within (rather than at) time. Don’t wait for moderator to pull plug! Plan for 2 mins oral per slide! Have a substantive/concrete final slide that communicates important points – so you aim to reach it on time; ensure the message isn’t missed. Slide numbers can help smooth the flow. 13
2. Planning what you'll say (or not say) a. How to manage time while presenting? b. How to emphasize main messages? c. What to listen for when watching a presentation? b. Pause, repeat, change cadence, smile: Mix up your delivery for effect. State what it is that you’re stating. Surprise with an out-of-character visual. All public speaking is a ‘performance’. Best way to control nerves is to do more and more. Speak as if to a friend or your dog – you would smile, laugh, be self-deprecating. Be fun. 14
Food availability (supply) and health outcomes Food Availability % Change in Child Change in IHD Mortality (100 kcal/cap/day increase) Stunting (
Food availability (supply) and health outcomes Food Availability % Change in Child Change in IHD Mortality (100 kcal/cap/day increase) Stunting (
Key concerns on quality of evidence: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) presentation “The evidence base proving which humanitarian responses are most effective is extremely lacking.“ (Darcy et al. 2013) There is a “dearth of published evidence from a range of settings on this topic [CMAM]” (ENN 2012) “The type of research currently published fails to answer adequately many of the questions posed.“ (Hall et al. 2011) 17
2. Planning what you'll say (or not say) a. How to manage time while presenting? b. How to emphasize main messages? c. What to listen for when watching a presentation? c. Learn new tricks not just new content: If you liked a talk, ask yourself ‘why’? If you had your eyes closed, would you ‘get’ the thrust and messages of the talk? Do they really need so many photos of cute cats or babies?!? 18
1. Preparing content a. How to capture audience attention or connect with their interests? b. How to structure main messages (e.g., balancing text length, clarifying terminology, etc.). c. Choice of data visualizations. 2. Planning what you'll say (or not say) a. How to manage time while presenting? b. How to emphasize main messages? c. What to listen for when watching a presentation? 3. Varied approaches for different audiences a. What is style of communication for operational agencies, Congress or global science committees? b. Has COVID changed any of the above? 19
3. Varied approaches for different audiences a. What style of communication for operational agencies, Congress or global science committees? b. Has COVID changed any of the above? a. Authoritative, but TAILORED TO AUDIENCE: Agencies (what should I do, what is the evidence?); Congress (why should we do this, what impact?); Scientists (can we generalize, which knowledge gaps to prioritize?). Find out audience make-up (diversity of backgrounds/responsibilities versus technical specialists versus generalists) 20
MULTISECTOR PROGRAM EFFECTS ON WOMEN’S DIETS Uganda panel survey [n = 3,600 HHs] Food category Effect in 2014 (over 2012) Effect in 2016 (over 2012) Cereals 1.201527 .9040405 Tubers/roots 1.077021 1.328351 Legumes .6867968* .8352416 Oilseeds .8575654 .8747842 Vegetables 1.386811** 1.095166 Fruits .6084369*** .5977029*** Meats 1.269184 1.478184* Dairy .6477301 1.509644 Fats/oils 1.514287** 1.359578* * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, Odds ratios estimated by fixed effects logit models
Patrick Webb/Tufts University, Director FTF Nutrition Innovation Lab CONCLUSIONS 1. Coherence and integration. Policy and program coherence needed around i) overall goal, ii) defined outcomes, and iii) integrated elements of programming to achieve them. 2. Flexibility for adopters, but fidelity to design for implementers. It matters that what was intended stays true if rigorous impact measurement desired. 3. Set appropriate expectations calibrated to timeframe and feasibility of Theory of Change
3. Varied approaches for different audiences a. What style of communication for operational agencies, Congress or global science committees? b. Has COVID changed any of the above? b. Multitasking in a vacuum: Watching chat room can be helpful or distracting. Beware of your background, settings, pets, audio, platform version, ability to share powerpoint, eye-contact, timing. Lack of audience body language. Names on screen help call out and participation. 23
Conclusions Be clear (…very clear) in your own mind, a) why the content and messages are important, b) define digestible take-away messages for them (or they will take their own…), c) keep essential information (for audience understanding) to a minimum and deal with questions after, d) use ‘big bang’ final words (not “more research needed”). Less is more (in terms of slides, and slide content). Practice, but beware the slides of March… (stay calm under pressure of technology glitches). Don’t rush, talk as if explaining your life’s passion to your dog—with excitement and empathy. 24
Source: Monmonier (1991) How to Lie with Maps. Uni. Chicago Press.
Charles Joseph Minard in Edward Tufte’s The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (2001) Graphics Press
You can also read