PROCESS GUIDE - City of ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN
REVIEW (RESIDENTIAL)
PROCESS GUIDE
Zoning Code Sec. 18.35.030 (C)
All new single-family standard home plans, and additions to existing standard home
plans shall be reviewed for compliance with the City of Maricopa Single-Family
Residential Design Guidelines prior to issuance of a building permit.
A Zoning Permit shall be issued for all plans found to meet the intent of the City of
Maricopa Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines.
Page 1 of 6
Rev. 7/2021
Over-All Review Time Frames
City will either grant or deny each type of permit (license) that it issues. The time frame includes an
administrative completeness review period to accept or reject the application, and a substantive
review period to provide a technical review of the request. The City shall approve or deny the request
within the overall time frame listed below, however, should the City extend the review period for
additional submittal(s), said extensions shall not exceed 25% of the overall time frame.
Please note: These are projected time frames only and may change
due to workload and staffing considerations
Administrative
Substantive Total Time
Completeness
Application Type Review Frame
Review
(business days) (business days)
(business days)
Administrative Design
10 30 40
Review
Submittal Review Turn Around Time Frames
Timeframes exclude all holidays, weekends and during the period where the applicant is revising
plans. The listed timeframes are not all-inclusive and are subject to change. These timeframes are for
plan review only and do not apply to submittals that require public notification outreach and approval
through the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Subsequent
First Review
Application Type Reviews
(business days )
(business days)
Administrative Design
15 10
Review
Page 2 of 6
Rev. 7/2021
ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW
PROCESS FLOW CHART
Page 3 of 6
Rev. 7/2021
ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW
Submittal Requirements:
1. Pre-Application Response Comments (required)
2. Project Narrative (required)
Describe proposed project
Address compliance with zoning requirements and Planned Area
Development (PAD) conditions that affect the design or placement of
homes in the approved subdivision plat
3. Typical Plot Plans (required)
Scale, north arrow, and dimensions
Home Builder and Subdivision Name
Plan Number
Minimum lot area
Typical lot lines
Location of ground mounted mechanical equipment screened from
public view
Identify plan options, roof overhangs, type of roof, upper levels,
accessory buildings
Projections identified with a dashed line, distance of
overhangs/projections to property line
Required building setbacks
Proposed and allowed lot coverage
Identify adjacent easements
Location of typical driveway
Provide additional plot plans for each elevation styles (A, B, and C) if
footprints, setbacks or lot coverage vary
4. Lot Fit Analysis (required)
Identify the fit of each standard plan for all lots, showing lot square
footage and proposed lot coverage percentages
Include all possible options for each standard plan
***Refer to attachment 1 for a sample lot fit analysis
matrix***
5. Typical Floor Plans (required)
Scale and dimensions
Home Builder and Subdivision Name
Interior space distribution with dimensions
Exterior walls and interior partitions
Line of second floor above and line of first floor below (for two-story
homes)
Window locations
Stairs
Page 4 of 6
Rev. 7/2021
Provide additional floor plans for all elevation styles, including
separate details for optional features (i.e. extended porches/patios,
extended garages, walk decks, casitas, etc.)
6. Color Elevations (required)
Scale and exterior dimensions
Home Builder and Subdivision Name
Recommend a minimum of four (4) standard plans
Recommend a minimum of four (4) elevations per standard plan
Building color elevations for all sides
Provide elevations for each standard floor plan proposed for the project
Provide additional elevations of each floor plan with options
Recommend a minimum of three different garage doors designs for
each standard plan
Identify materials proposed, including decorative elements and garage
doors as standard features
Identify accent features such as window trims or other features that
project from the main wall plane and note their depth
Identify accents, details (i.e. corbels, exposed rafter tails, etc.) and any
other areas
Identify gutters and downspouts painted to match, if applicable
All elevations must be oriented consistently with the floor plans
7. Streetscape Color Elevations (required)
Provide a street scape (front and rear elevation) and site plan view
showing all proposed plans
***Refer to attachment 2 for example street scape and site
plan view***
8. Materials and Color Schemes (required)
A matrix listing all proposed color schemes, detailing color and
material names and manufacturer’s number
9. Front Yard Landscape Plans (required)
10.Garage Door Options (required)
11.Roof Plans (required)
12.HOA Approval Letter (if applicable)
13.Site Map or Parcel Map of Proposed Lots (required)
Parcel Map (highlight project area within a parcel or plat map)
Page 5 of 6
Rev. 7/2021
REGULATORY BILL OF RIGHTS
This past legislative session (Fiftieth Legislature, First Regular Session), the Arizona Legislature passed Senate
Bill 1598. This “Regulatory Bill of Rights” went into effect on July 20, 2011 (with full implementation on
December 31, 2012). The rights afforded private regulated parties under the new law are provided below.
A.R.S. § 9-832: REGULATORY BILL OF RIGHTS
TO ENSURE FAIR AND OPEN REGULATION BY CITIES, A PERSON:
• IS ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES IF THE PERSON
PREVAILS BY ADJUDICATION ON THE MERITS AGAINST A CITY IN A COURT
PROCEEDING REGARDING A CITY DECISION AS PROVIDED IN A.R.S. § 12-348.
• IS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE INFORMATION AND NOTICE REGARDING INSPECTIONS AS
PROVIDED IN A.R.S. § 9-833 (EFFECTIVE JUNE 30, 2012).
• IS ENTITLED TO HAVE A CITY NOT BASE A LICENSING DECISION IN WHOLE OR IN
PART ON LICENSING CONDITIONS OR REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY
AUTHORIZED AS PROVIDED IN A.R.S. § 9-834.
• MAY HAVE A CITY APPROVE OR DENY THE PERSON’S LICENSE APPLICATION WITHIN
A PREDETERMINED PERIOD OF TIME AS PROVIDED IN A.R.S. § 9-835 (EFFECTIVE
DECEMBER 31, 2012).
• IS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE WRITTEN OR ELECTRONIC NOTICE FROM A CITY ON DENIAL
OF A LICENSE APPLICATION (EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 2012).
o THAT JUSTIFIES THE DENIAL WITH REFERENCES TO THE STATUTE,
ORDINANCE, REGULATION, DELEGATION AGREEMENT OR AUTHORIZED
SUBSTANTIVE POLICY STATEMENT ON WHICH THE DENIAL IS BASED AS
PROVIDED IN A.R.S. § 9-835.
o THAT EXPLAINS THE APPLICANT’S RIGHT TO APPEAL THE DENIAL AS
PROVIDED IN A.R.S. § 9-835.
• IS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE INFORMATION REGARDING THE LICENSE APPLICATION
PROCESS AT THE TIME THE PERSON OBTAINS AN APPLICATION FOR A LICENSE AS
PROVIDED IN A.R.S. § 9-836.
• MAY INSPECT ALL ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, AND SUBSTANTIVE POLICY
STATEMENTS OF A CITY, INCLUDING A DIRECTORY OF DOCUMENTS, AT THE OFFICES
OF THE CITY AS PROVIDED IN A.R.S. § 9-837.
• UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED, MAY EXPECT CITIES TO AVOID DUPLICATION
OF OTHER LAWS THAT DO NOT ENHANCE REGULATORY CLARITY AND TO AVAOID
DUAL PERMITTING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE AS PROVIDED IN A.R.S. §
9-834.
• MAY FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE CITY COUNCIL CONCERNING AN ORDINANCE,
REGULATION OR SUBSTANTIVE POLICY STATEMENT THAT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH
A.R.S. § 9832
Page 6 of 6
Rev. 7/2021
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT 11
SAMPLE LOT FIT ANALYSIS MATRIX
Lot # Lot Area Maximum Lot Plan # _101_______ Plan # _102_______ Plan # _103_______
Square Area Square Total maximum Total maximum Total maximum
Footage footage footprint SF _2,200__ footprint SF _1,800____ footprint SF _1,900____
Allowed (40%)
Lot Coverage % Lot Coverage % Lot Coverage %
(Total footprint SF/Lot Area (Total footprint SF/Lot Area (Total footprint SF/Lot Area
Square Footage x 100) Square Footage x 100) Square Footage x 100)
1 6,000 2,400 36.6% 30% 36.6%
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Page 5 of 5
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT 2 2
EXAMPLE
STREET SCAPE SITE PLAN VIEW
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT 22
EXAMPLE STREET SCAPE VIEW
(FRONT AND REAR ELEVATION VIEW)
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DESIGN GUIDELINES
03/02/2021
CITY OF MARICOPASINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 3
PURPOSE AND INTENT 3
SAFETY THROUGH DESIGN 3
DISCRETIONARY DECISION MAKING 4
GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINE PRINCIPLES 4
ARCHITECTUAL DESIGN 4
DESIGN ELEMENTS AND DETAILS 5
GARAGES AND DRIVEWAYS 7
COVERED PATIOS AND PORCHES 9
COLORS AND MATERIALS 11
ROOF ARTICULATION AND DESIGN 12
CITY OF MARICOPA
REQUIRED HOME DIVERSITY 15SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
SAFETY THROUGH
DESIGN
INTRODUCTION
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, or CPTED (pronounced
sep-ted), is a crime prevention philosophy based on the theory that
proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a
The City of Maricopa encourages the creative and innovative use of
PURPOSE AND reduction in the fear and incidence of crime. It focuses on the positive
use of a space and natural elements to maintain a sustainable quality of
current and emerging development practices and seeks to strike a
balance between the needs of the homebuilding industry and the
INTENT life for intended users, while offering a sense of security by increasing
the difficulty for criminal or abnormal activities. The principles of
consumer. The Single Family Residential Design Guidelines seek to provide CPTED - natural access control, natural surveillance, territoriality, and
project designers the City’s expectations for single family residential maintenance - when integrated with the principles of physical security,
development. Compliance with the guidelines will be evaluated during present a unique approach to minimizing crime opportunities. This may
the city’s Administrative Design Review process. In accordance to City of Maricopa General Plan goals and objectives, this be accomplished through the design elements described in this Manual
document is intended to provide direction to homebuilders, developers, and are noted throughout when they are applied.
contractors, designers, and city staff. Design guidelines are adopted
policies intended to provide the basis for design review and approval and a. Natural Surveillance
are subject to interpretation by city staff. Design the placement of physical features and activities in
such a way as to maximize visibility and foster positive social
Diversity of quality residential architectural design is encouraged interaction among legitimate users of the space. Creating
throughout the City; with the design of projects reflecting a general environments that allow the opportunity for people to engage
continuity and harmony consistent with the character of the community in their normal behavior and to observe the space around
while at the same time providing new, creative, forward- looking and them limits the potential for crime to occur.
dynamic approaches to design. High quality “stylized” or “theme”
architecture is encouraged. Innovative architectural trends are also b. Natural Access Control
encouraged on standard plans designed per approved design criteria for Strategically locate entrances and exits, fencing, lighting,
a Planned Area or Master Planned Development. and landscaping to control or limit the flow of or access.
Most criminal intruders will try to find a way into an area
The exhibits contained within this document illustrate a variety of where they will not be easily observed. Limiting access and
architectural detailing, plans and elevations in order to convey a diversity increasing natural surveillance keeps them out altogether or
of product and universal design principles and emphasize Non-Garage marks them as an intruder.
dominant architecture. The Single Family Residential Design Guidelines
are adopted and amended by the City Council. c. Natural Territorial Reinforcement
Design buildings, fences, pavement, signs, lighting, and
landscaping to express ownership and define
public, semi-public and private spaces, so that natural
territorial reinforcement occurs. An environment designed
CITY OF MARICOPA
to clearly delineate private space does two things. First, it
creates a sense of ownership. Owners have vested interest
and are more likely to challenge intruders or report them
to the police. Second, the sense of ownership within a
community or space creates an environment where
“strangers” or “intruders” stand out and are more
easily identified.SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
DISCRETIONARY
DECISION MAKING
Every project is unique and requires some decisions to be
made on a case-by-case basis. While some provisions of the
guidelines include quantitative standards, most require qualitative
interpretation. If the Applicant chooses to deviate from a design
guideline in order to achieve an attractive, unique design,
such a request will be given consideration from the Zoning
Administrator. The Zoning Administrator has the latitude to
interpret the guidelines and to permit flexibility so long as the
proposed project meets the intent of the guidelines herein.
FIGURE A
GENERAL DESIGN
f. Homes should be designed with consideration of
GUIDELINE PRINCIPLES water runoff, solar access, as well as climatic and
other environmental conditions.
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
g. Provide architectural design for home products to
a. Two-story houses shall utilize offset massing (vertical ensure that the smallest house has the same amount
articulation) to achieve distinction between stories of effort, art, and detail as the largest house.
and building mass. Design of creative private outdoor
spaces is highly encouraged to achieve this objective. h. Monotonous look-a-like structures (sameness) are
Articulate all facades, including variation in massing, discouraged. Effort should be made to create visually
roof forms, and wall planes. interesting homes by varying building form, volume,
massing, heights, roof styles and color and materials.
b. Incorporate architectural elements and details that add Refer to Figure C
visual interest, scale, and character to all sides of the
home. See Figure A FIGURE C
c. Corner lots may have a mix of single-story and two-story
homes provided the second-story portions of the homes
do not encompass more than 75 percent of the building
CITY OF MARICOPA
footprint, and the second-story portion of the dwelling
has a distinctive building mass (vertical articulation).
See Figure B
d. Two-story dwellings located on corner lots shall include
windows on the facade facing the side street.
e. No second-story street-facing wall should run in
a continuous plane of more than 20 feet without a
window or a projection, offset, or recess of the building
wall at least one foot in depth.
FIGURE B FIGURE CSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
DESIGN
ELEMENTS AND DETAILS
a. Each home should utilize a variety
of the following elements to
enhance the home's character:
• Recessed or projecting
balconies
• Driveway pavers
• Trellises
• Awnings
• Porches
• Columns
• Decorative doors and
windows
• Exterior moldings
• Roof overhangs
• Masonry
• Wood or metal accents
• Decorative lighting
• Ledges
• Arched windows
• Shutters
b. The entry way of the home is required to be located allowing the
entry way to be clearly visible from public view; it shall act as the
home's focal point (CPTED principal).
• The primary entry and windows shall be the dominant
elements of the front façade.
• Windows and doors should be aligned and sized to bring order
to the building façade.
• Windows and doors should be sufficiently recessed to create
façade patterns that add variety and interest to the design of
the home.
CITY OF MARICOPA
• The front door/entry of the dwelling must be illuminated with
an entry light that is controlled with a switch.
• Integrate front porches, courtyards, or other entry features
that create an attractive interface with front yard areas and
feature arrival. Using steps or other design elements that
feature arrival are encouraged. See Figure D
• Pillars, columns, and posts should be architecturally enhanced
with stucco, brick, stone, or other authentic materials for visual
interest. FIGURE DSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
GARAGES AND b. On lots 55 feet or larger, garages shall be designed and
located to reduce the visual impact of garage doors
DRIVEWAYS along street frontages. A mix of garage orientations (i.e.
significantly recessed front facing, side-entry, tandem) shall
be provided to deemphasize garage dominance.
c. A minimum of two (2) coach lights shall be placed at the
a. On lots with forward-facing garage plans, the garage portion front face of the garage or other appropriate location for
of the dwelling shall not extend forward of the livable security. Coach lights shall be proportionate to the size of
portion(s) of the dwelling by more than six feet. If a front- the front elevation, shall fully illuminate the address plate
facing garage projects out from the porch or livable areas and shall utilize a sensor to operate from dusk to dawn.
of the dwelling, the applicant shall provide portals, low (CPTED principle)
courtyard walls with pilasters, or other de-emphasizing
techniques for approval by the City, that extend forward of d. Dwellings with three-car garages shall be designed with
the garage face. Elements may encroach into the setback if the third car garage architecturally separated and offset FIGURE F
deemed necessary. See Figure E a minimum two (2) feet from the other garage doors
In addition, it is desirable to orientate the 3rd garage
differently or to provide for a detached third car garage e. Incorporate decorative garage doors to assist with the overall design of the front
(see below image). The intent of this standard is to façade. Utilizing "carriage style", windows and other non-conventional sectional garage
soften the garage dominance and provide for horizontal door styles is recommended to provide additional diversity and to better tie in with
articulation. architectural themes. See Figure F
f. Side-loaded garages shall provide windows or other architectural details that mimic the
features of the living portion of the dwelling on the side of the garage facing the street.
FIGURE E
Example of a home with a side-entry garage which appears livable from street view.
CITY OF MARICOPA
g. Provide driveway pavers as an option with each elevation.
h. Massing shall accentuate entries and minimize garage dominance.
i. For lots equal to or greater than 55 feet, front-facing garage doors (not including side
returns) shall not exceed 40 percent of the width of the front elevation. Incorporate this
guideline as a standard on at least two (2) floor plans.SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
FIGURE G FIGURE H
b. A useable, covered outdoor patio shall be provided
COVERED PATIOS
on the rear side of each home. Covered patio
dimensions should be a minimum of 80 square feet,
AND PORCHES with a minimum depth of 8 feet. See Figure G
CITY OF MARICOPA
c. At least one elevation per plan should have a usable
Domestic & Global Market covered and hardscaped front porch with a minimum
depth of 6 feet from front wall of house to interior wall
a. Covered patios and porches shall be incorporated into residential architecture. of courtyard. Entryways alone cannot act as a sole front
Patio and porch columns must be constructed of same materials as the rest of porch. See Figure H
the home, including the roof tile and roof slope or designed in a manner
to complement the existing architecture of the home. d. A courtyard may be substituted for no more than two
plans. Courtyard walls shall not exceed three and a half
feet in height. Courtyard area shall be hardscaped and
provide entry feature enhancements. See Figure I
FIGURE ISINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
COLORS
& MATERIALS
a. Materials and colors shall remain true to the architectural
"style" of the home. A variety of colors shall be used for the
body, trim, entryways and garages to create contrast and a
unique, attractive streetscape.
b. As a standard feature, stone, brick, or accent facade material
shall be provided on at least one elevation for each floor plan
(see below).
c. Homes shall utilize energy-efficient components and building
materials to conserve energy and promote sustainability.
d. Homes shall utilize high-quality, durable, natural materials.
Synthetic materials are acceptable if they are sustainable
products.
e. Homes shall utilize contrasting, but complementary, colors for
trim, windows, doors, and key architectural elements. Pastels
and brown desert theme are discouraged. Intense and/or
vivid color should be used to accent entry-ways and special
architectural features of a home. See Figure J
f. Materials applied to any building elevation should wrap
around onto adjoining walls of the structure at a minimum of
6 feet or to the side yard fence. See Figure K
FIGURE J
CITY OF MARICOPA
FIGURE KSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
ROOF MATERIALS
ARTICULATION &
GABLE ROOF
HIP ROOF
DESIGN
a. New residential development shall provide f. Roof materials and colors shall be consistent
a variety of building and roof forms and with the desired architectural style. A variety
ridgelines. Elevations shall be structurally of roof colors is encouraged however the
different, with different roof types facing the colors of roofing materials shall not be
street. altered by staining or painting.
ALTERNATING
b. No adjacent home or home directly across g. Roof materials shall exhibit earth-tone colors
ROOFLINE
the street shall have the same elevation or and be non-reflective in muted tones.
roofline. Acceptable roof materials include:
• flat tile
c. The roofline may be changed by the • slate tile
following options: • barrel tile
• Alternating the ridgeline between parallel • cool roof tile
and perpendicular to the street. • standing seam
• Alternating the roof type between
gable and hip. h. The design, color, and materials of accessory
• Alternating the roofline pitch by a minimum structures shall be architecturally tied to the
FLAT TILE
of three units vertical (i.e. 3:12 to 6:12) main structure.
• Alternating between one and two-
story homes i. Metal flashing, vents, pipes, gutters, electrical
panels and other exposed metal must be
d. Solar panels on rooftops are encouraged painted to match the color of the facia, body
to be consistent with the roof pitch and to of the house or to provide aesthetical
appear as an integral part of overall roof contrast. Builders shall avoid exposed metal
design. flues.
e. Roof mounted HVAC and evaporative cooler j. Design chimneys as an architectural element.
BARREL TILE
SLATE TILE
equipment is prohibited. Such equipment
shall be properly screened from public view.
Vents and flues should be located to occur k. Variation of roof materials shall be provided
on the least prominent side of the ridgeline per Table 1-1 below.
whenever possible and shall be painted to
match the color of the roof or to serve as an
aesthetic architectural element.
CITY OF MARICOPA
STANDING SEAM
COOL ROOF TILE
ALTERNATING RIDGELINESINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
REQUIRED HOME DIVERSITY
Single-Family subdivisions shall include a diversity of architectural types as set forth in Table 1-1 below:
SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS
TABLE 1-1
0-99 100+
Number of Floor Plans Required Minimum of 3 floor plans, 3 elevations Minimum of 5 floor plans, 4 elevations
per plan. per plan.
Number of Roof Styles Required Minimum of 3 floor plans, 3 elevations Minimum of 5 floor plans, 4 elevations
per plan. per plan.
Number of Color Schemes Required Minimum of 8 different color schemes Minimum of 10 different color schemes
per plan. per plan.
Number of Roof Colors Required Minimum of 3 different roof colors. Minimum of 4 different roof colors.
CITY OF MARICOPAYou can also read
