Process Book - LIAM SMITH ID Class of 2020
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
PROCESS BOOK 2 Chapter 1 / Research 4 Conjectures About Me 5 Interview with Yujin Park 6 Survey 7 What is Cycling Safety 8 Self-Observation I am an avid cyclist and wanted to focus on some aspect of cycling lifestyle for my thesis. 9 Market Research When the possibility of safety came up as a direction, I sprung at the chance. As someone who was personally involved in an incident, and Chapter 2 / Transition knows many cyclists who have been affected, the community aspect of this sport was a key 11 Why Strava motivator throughout the project. 12 Iteration 1 and How it Failed Chapter 3 / Checkpoint 15 Revisions 17 Logo Iteration 18 User Journey 20 Photography 22 Contact
PROCESS BOOK 4 Early Conjectures Before conducting any meaningful research, I created four sketch concepts based on the overarching research categories of Focus, Science and Technology, Business, and Arts. These early ideas helped inform the direction I wanted to steer the project by helping indicate what seemed most important to focus my efforts on. Despite no obvious connection, the Arts section proved most formative to the final product because of its focus on the emotions of victims, feelings of powerlessness felt by many cyclists, and the community aspect of the category. The four concepts can be found in their entirety on the Design Thesis Website.
PROCESS BOOK 5 Interview with Yujin Park In September of 2019, I had the privilege of interviewing Yujin Park, a City Planning PhD candidate at Knowlton School of Architecture. Her research is focused on urban mobility. One study she conducted was focused around cyclists and how often they take detours and why. This information proved critical to my own project and helped inform the different questions I should ask in my own research. The full 18 minute interview and transcript can be found on the Design Thesis Website. “In terms of safety there is not only the physical environment, but also how peers view cycling that are important concerns when addressing safety.” - Yujin Park
PROCESS BOOK 6 Peer Survey I received responses from a total of 35 cyclists. While most of the results were predictable, there were a few surprises. The results breakdown can be found at left. Many riders regularly experience dangerous encounters with traffic. This drastically increases the likelihood of a dangerous crash. The most surprising response was that a significant minority of those surveyed felt that other cyclists were dangerous. I did not know it at that time, but the idea of a verification system for safe riders, eventually evolved into Checkpoint.
PROCESS BOOK 7 What is Cycling Safety Through my research, I found most products on the market already fell into three categories: Infrastructure, Preventing a Collision, and the Aftermath of a Collision. The main flashpoint is the interaction between traffic and cyclists on the road. The differential in speed between cars, bikes, and pedestrians makes it hard to navigate for all parties. Oftentimes, a collision is avoidable if the cyclist is aware of their surroundings but this requires a level of awareness not everyone can maintain. This would become the main focus of my thesis.
PROCESS BOOK 8 Self Observation 1. Be Active As an insider in the community, I could leverage my own experiences and techniques to help inform less experienced riders. My main takeaways from this were the importance 2. Flow with Traffic of always being active in my environment. It is tempting to listen to music, but this can be distracting and reduce your awareness of approaching traffic. 3. Be Predictable It is also crucial to ride in the lane, not in the shoulder or sidewalk. Riding in traffic makes it impossible for a car to squeeze you off the road. The majority of accidents occur when a bike enters the road from the sidewalk since it is much harder for a driver to spot you. A final observation was the importance of being predictable with your movements and signaling. Ride in a manner that traffic can understand and react to accordingly.
PROCESS BOOK 9 Market Research Once again, I was able to leverage my connections within the industry to get a better picture of the “We have a strong desire to current market and cover my bases. I wanted to help, but we are concerned make sure I didn’t miss any information because of that very insider position. I interviewed several local bike shops in the Columbus area to discuss whether they would be willing to teach new customers safety information, that customers will be or even issue a proto-certification. They all were enthusiastic about the proposition; unwilling to participate.” but expressed concerns that new customers - Paradise Garage might not be as willing. Additionally, they brought up the importance of education on what to wear when riding to improve visibility, as many new customers were ignorant on that topic.
PROCESS BOOK 11 Why Strava Strava is the perfect platform to improve the safety of all road users since it already connects thousands of athletes through the spirit of healthy competition. It is a highly addicting social media service that gamifies exercise. Additionally, they have indicated a willingness to create sub-brands with safety themes. Strava Metro in particular is focused on the improvement of urban cycling infrastructure. Using my research up to this point, I created the sub-brand Strava Checkpoint. It was centered around utilizing the existing app and adding in safety themed challenges.
PROCESS BOOK 12 Checkpoint 1.0 and How it Failed At the time it was presented, Checkpoint was a complete Strava sub-brand that introduced safety- themed challenges into the existing app. I did not know how the app would monitor if an individual was actually riding safely. There was a separate interface within the “Challenges” section of the app where verified members of the community would produce videos about how to be safe and tips for newer users on how to stay safe. There were new badges to denote users who had completed specific challenges and could display them in a virtual trophy case.
PROCESS BOOK 13 Continuation This system was a failure because there was no guarantee it would have an impact on safety. The badges and challenges were underwhelming and many people in the audience found it hard to understand what the project even was. As such, for the updated iteration, I cut the fat and really doubled-down on the function of the system and a more seamless integration with Strava. The community interviews were an interesting prospect; however, despite several scripts and in-depth interviews they were met with poor reception so I opted not to include them in the next version of Checkpoint. If I had more time, this is a feature I would like to explore more as it reinforces the spread of information. In two separate experiments I conducted based on principles of concussion protocol, information retention was significantly stronger when disseminated by a real person instead of a picture or text.
PROCESS BOOK 14 Chapter 3 Checkpoint
PROCESS BOOK 15 Revisions As touched on in the previous chapter, I wanted the integration of Checkpoint to go nearly unnoticed. I reduced the amount of information displayed to only a lock. It features either an up or down arrow to indicate change in safety score. On your user profile, the persistent safety score is located next to your name. It is easy to locate not only on your profile, but others as well to make finding safe riding partners a breeze.
PROCESS BOOK 16 Continuation Additional changes include the scaling back of challenges to group-riding excercises and a multiplier to safety score when in a group. This is done using the “flyby’s” feature. When recording a ride it will compare the route and time of day with other users to determine if you were alone or in a group. This encourages community building by offering an additional incentive to those who choose to ride in a group. As will be explained in the user journey section, Checkpoint is now powered exclusively by GPS and gyroscope data from your phone. It determines your score by monitoring how smoothly you speed up, slow down, and corner. The smoother you are, the higher you’ll score.
PROCESS BOOK 17 Logo Evolution Originally, I was designing Checkpoint as an entire sub-brand with matching soft-goods but I steered away from this idea very early on. The original design was too similar to Strava Metro and I wanted this to be distinct. The second iteration stresses that this product offers a new experience to traditional Strava; however, I felt it was downplaying the importance of Strava. I struggled to match the iconic orange despite using corporate color assets, which I rectified for the final iteration. For the final iteration, I struck a happy balance so that it is separate, but deeply connected with the Strava ecosystem of products and services without losing its recognizability and uniqueness.
PROCESS BOOK 18
PROCESS BOOK 19
PROCESS BOOK 20 Photography Visual branding is very much a part of Strava so it was critical to match the style and vibe. I worked with real users of the app to put together a small shoot to capture the honest personalities that characterize the Strava brand.
PROCESS BOOK 21 Read more about my research at: https://desis.osu.edu/seniorthesis/index.php/liam-smith/
PROCESS BOOK 22 Thanks. Contact LIAM SMITH liamsmith.me ID Class of 2020 smith.11182@osu.edu
You can also read