PHYSICAL REVIEW X 12, 011024 (2022) - Leggett Modes Accompanying Crystallographic Phase Transitions

Page created by Linda Gibbs
 
CONTINUE READING
PHYSICAL REVIEW X 12, 011024 (2022) - Leggett Modes Accompanying Crystallographic Phase Transitions
PHYSICAL REVIEW X 12, 011024 (2022)

                    Leggett Modes Accompanying Crystallographic Phase Transitions
                   Quintin N. Meier ,1 Daniel Hickox-Young,2 Geneva Laurita ,3 Nicola A. Spaldin ,4
                                  James M. Rondinelli ,2,5 and Michael R. Norman 6,*
                       1
                        Université Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LITEN, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble, France
                                          2
                                            Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
                                        Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
                     3
                      Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Bates College, Lewiston, Maine 04240, USA
                        4
                          Materials Theory, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
                                 5
                                   Northwestern-Argonne Institute of Science and Engineering (NAISE),
                                        Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
                      6
                       Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, USA

              (Received 23 July 2021; revised 12 October 2021; accepted 9 December 2021; published 4 February 2022)

                 Higgs and Goldstone modes, well known in high-energy physics, have been realized in a number of
              condensed matter physics contexts, including superconductivity and magnetism. The Goldstone-Higgs
              concept is also applicable to and gives rise to new insight on structural phase transitions. Here, we show
              that the Leggett mode, a collective mode observed in multiband superconductors, also has an analog in
              crystallographic phase transitions. Such structural Leggett modes can occur in the phase channel as in the
              original work of Leggett [Prog. Theor. Phys. 36, 901 (1966)]. That is, they are antiphase Goldstone modes
              (antiphasons). In addition, a new collective mode can also occur in the amplitude channel, an out-of phase
              (antiphase) Higgs mode, that should be observable in multiband superconductors as well. We illustrate the
              existence and properties of these structural Leggett modes using the example of the pyrochlore relaxor
              ferroelectric Cd2 Nb2 O7 .
              DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011024                        Subject Areas: Condensed Matter Physics

                    I. INTRODUCTION                                     Superconductors can exhibit other collective modes.
   Spontaneous symmetry breaking is a ubiquitous phe-                In particular, a relative phase mode of the order parameters
nomenon in physics, and is responsible for various collec-           of the two bands of a two-band superconductor was
tive modes, most famously the well-known Goldstone and               proposed by Leggett [5] and first realized in MgB2 [6].
Higgs modes. The former refers to fluctuations of the phase          While the Goldstone mode is pushed to the plasma fre-
of an order parameter, the latter to fluctuations of its             quency by coupling to the electromagnetic field, the Leggett
amplitude. These modes play a fundamental role in gauge              mode maintains charge neutrality and so is not affected by
theories of particle physics, and are also important in              the field [5]. Other modes are known as well, for instance,
condensed matter physics. The Goldstone-Higgs phenome-               Carlson-Goldman modes in which the superconducting
non in high-energy physics is a relativistic generalization          and normal condensates oscillate out of phase [7]. In
of the analogous behavior found in superconductors [1].              addition, in superfluid 3He a variety of clapping, flapping,
In superconductors, the Goldstone mode does not occur at             and Higgs modes occur because of the high degeneracy of its
zero energy as in a neutral superfluid, but it is pushed to          SOð3Þ × SOð3Þ × Uð1Þ order parameter space [8,9].
the plasma frequency by coupling to the electromagnetic                 Structural phase transitions are typically associated
field [2]. The superconducting Higgs mode is nontrivial to           with soft phonons [10], and the concepts of Goldstone
                                                                     and Higgs modes have provided new insight into these
observe since its energy tends to be located near the
                                                                     transitions. A classic example is the pyrochlore Cd2 Re2 O7 .
quasiparticle continuum [3]. Nevertheless, it has been
                                                                     Its structural phase transition arises from an instability
observed in several superconductors [4].
                                                                     associated with a doubly degenerate Γ−3 phonon [11]. This
                                                                     defines a Mexican-hat free-energy surface with the top of
  *
      norman@anl.gov                                                 the hat representing the high-temperature cubic phase and
                                                                     the brim representing the lower symmetry distorted phase.
Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of        In the Landau free energy, anisotropy terms that warp the
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to       brim of the Mexican hat only arise at sixth order, suggesting
the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation,   the existence of a low-energy Goldstone mode correspond-
and DOI.                                                             ing to oscillations along the brim. (Since they are not at zero

2160-3308=22=12(1)=011024(10)                                  011024-1             Published by the American Physical Society
PHYSICAL REVIEW X 12, 011024 (2022) - Leggett Modes Accompanying Crystallographic Phase Transitions
QUINTIN N. MEIER et al.                                                                    PHYS. REV. X 12, 011024 (2022)

energy because of the warping terms, these are sometimes         force-constant matrix [26]. The advantage of Landau
referred to as pseudo-Goldstone modes). Subsequent               theory is the reduction of the large force-constant matrix
Raman scattering experiments [12] exhibited strong evi-          to this smaller one involving only the qi relevant to the
dence for this mode, and its existence has been recently         phase transition [19].
confirmed by diffuse scattering studies [13]. The Higgs             To illustrate the structural Leggett mode, we present a
mode is also evident from the Raman data, though its             simple example in which the phase transition involves only
interpretation has been challenged by recent pump-probe          two modes, q and r, each from a different two-dimensional
measurements [14]. After these pioneering studies of             group representation. For simplicity, we use a Cartesian
Cd2 Re2 O7 , Higgs and Goldstone modes have been pro-            basis, qðq1 ; q2 Þ and rðr1 ; r2 Þ. In a polar basis, qi ¼
posed in a variety of perovskite and other complex oxides        Qi cosðϕi Þ. In general, in the uncoupled case, each mode
[15–20]. Routes to detect them if they are optically silent      would have a different transition temperature, T q ≠ T r . We
have also been identified [21].                                  describe each mode by a Mexican-hat potential and include
   Here, we investigate whether the Leggett mode can be          a biquadratic coupling between them [27]. In this case, the
realized in the structural context, where it could give new      free energy is given by
insight into the associated structural phase transitions. We
begin by developing a minimal Landau model that                         aq 2           bq                a
                                                                 F¼       ðq1 þ q22 Þ þ ðq21 þ q22 Þ2 þ r ðr21 þ r22 Þ
describes a structural phase transition that is accompanied             2              4                  2
by a new collective mode, the antiphase Higgs mode (the                   br 2            c
                                                                        þ ðr1 þ r22 Þ2 þ ðq21 þ q22 Þðr21 þ r22 Þ;          ð1Þ
amplitude analog of the Leggett mode) that should also be                 4               2
observable in multiband superconductors. We then consider
a Landau treatment of the ferroelectric transition in the        where the temperature dependence is typically only
pyrochlore Cd2 Nb2 O7 , where we show that both the              included in the quadratic terms aq ≡ aq0 ðT − T q Þ and
antiphase Higgs mode and the Leggett mode (the anti-             ar ≡ ar0 ðT − T r Þ. The subspace of the force-constant
phason) are possible. Finally, we discuss secondary modes        matrix of interest is now given by
that can drive these Leggett modes by coupling to them                                           
in the context of pump-probe studies. We conclude by                                      ∂ 2 F 
                                                                              Φij ðTÞ ¼                               ; ð2Þ
discussing the relevance of our work to other materials, in                              ∂ϕi ∂ϕj ϕi ¼hϕi i;ϕj ¼hϕj i
particular, those that involve modes at nonzero wave
vectors.                                                         where ϕi ∈ fq1 ; q2 ; r1 ; r2 g, and  describes the thermo-
                                                                 dynamic average at a given temperature.
           II. MINIMAL LANDAU MODEL                                Choosing without loss of generality that q1 ¼ hqi,
                                                                 q2 ¼ 0, r1 ¼ hri, r2 ¼ 0, the force-constant matrix then
    A superconductor is described by an order parameter          becomes
Δeiϕ with an amplitude Δ and a phase ϕ. In a two-band
                                                                                 2                                      3
superconductor, one can identify a collective mode, called                            Hq        2chqihri     0     0
the Leggett mode, that corresponds to oscillations of the                     6 2chqihri                     0     0 7
                                                                              6                    Hr                7
relative phase of the order parameters associated with the                  Φ¼6                                      7;     ð3Þ
two bands ϕ1 − ϕ2 [5]. This mode is an eigenvector of a                       4    0                0       Gq     0 5
secular matrix whose eigenvalues are the collective mode                               0            0        0    Gr
energies [22]. In the structural context, the corresponding
secular matrix is the force-constant matrix [19], with           with
elements φij ¼ ð∂ 2 F=∂ui ∂uj Þ, where ui is the displace-
ment of the ith ion from its high-symmetry position and F                  Hq ¼ aq0 ðT − T q Þ þ 3bq hqi2 þ chri2 ;
is the free energy. For a periodic system with N atoms in the               Gq ¼ aq0 ðT − T q Þ þ bq hqi2 þ chri2 ;
unit cell, this is a 3N × 3N matrix. For our further analysis,
we use a reduced form of the force-constant matrix,                         H r ¼ ar0 ðT − T r Þ þ 3br hri2 þ chqi2 ;
Φij ¼ ð∂ 2 F=∂qi ∂qj Þ, where qi are symmetry-adapted                       Gr ¼ ar0 ðT − T r Þ þ br hri2 þ chqi2 :
distortion modes [23,24]. Each qi is a linear combination
of atomic displacements that transform like a particular         Here, we use H to indicate Higgs modes, that is, amplitude
group representation of the high-symmetry phase, and as          modes with symmetry A1, and G to indicate Goldstone
such describe a collective motion involving multiple             modes, that is, phase modes whose symmetry depends on
ions. For structural phase transitions following Landau          the underlying space groups involved.
theory [25], F is formulated as a polynomial expansion in           There are no off-diagonal terms coupling the Higgs
these qi . The distortions from the high-symmetry phase are      and Goldstone sectors, but in this simple example, the
given, in the harmonic limit, by the eigenvectors of the         biquadratic coupling term couples the two Higgs modes

                                                           011024-2
LEGGETT MODES ACCOMPANYING CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC PHASE …                                                                     PHYS. REV. X 12, 011024 (2022)

Hq and Hr . Because of this coupling, we expect that a new                                   is at zero energy, in which case the dispersion is linear in
collective mode, the antiphase Higgs (the amplitude analog                                   momentum instead.
of the Leggett mode), can exist. To see this, note that the                                     What about the antiphason, the out-of-phase mode in the
eigenvalues of the force-constant matrix are the square                                      phase channel that would be the analog of the super-
of the collective mode frequencies [28]. That is, the                                        conducting Leggett mode? To obtain this requires coupling
eigenvalues of the upper 2 × 2 block of the force-constant                                   of the two Goldstone modes. One can show that such
matrix are                                                                                   coupling requires terms in Eq. (1) that are linear in the
                                                                                             two Goldstone variables. In the above example, this
                                  qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffii
           1h                                                                                would be terms of the form q2 r2 times Higgs variables
ω2 ¼         H þ Hq              ðHr − Hq Þ2 þ 16c2 hqi2 hri2 : ð4Þ                        (q1 ; r1 ; q21 ; r21 ; q1 r1 , etc.). Although these terms do not exist
           2 r
                                                                                             in the above minimal model, they do exist in general.
The eigenvectors are                                                                         Instead of extending our minimal model to the more
                                                                                           general case, we instead illustrate antiphasons using the
                                       1     ω2 − Hq                                        specific example of Cd2 Nb2 O7 .
                            ðu; vÞ ¼     1;           ;                             ð5Þ
                                      N     2chqihri
                                                                                                      III. LANDAU THEORY OF Cd2 Nb2 O7
where N  is a normalization factor. For small chqihri
                                                                                                The pyrochlore Cd2 Nb2 O7 is one of the few known
relative to Hq − Hr , we can think in terms of separate
                                                                                             stoichiometric materials that exhibits relaxor ferroelectric
Higgs modes that are weakly coupled. In the limit of large
                                                                                             behavior. Because it is stoichiometric, its phonons, as
coupling chqihri, however, we obtain an in-phase Higgs
                                                                                             observed by IR reflectivity and Raman scattering, are well
mode and an out-of-phase Higgs mode. The latter is the
                                                                                             defined. The pyrochlore structure consists of a network of
Higgs analog of the Leggett phase mode. These are
                                                                                             corner sharing NbO6 octahedra interpenetrated by CdO
illustrated in Fig. 1 for the simple case where the q and
                                                                                             tetahedra (or CdO chains depending on how one views it),
r parameters are the same. For this case, it is easy to show
                                                                                             as shown in Fig. 2. Several structural transitions have been
that the square of the Higgs mode energy is −2aq and that
                                                                                             observed as a function of temperature, where the symmetry
of the Leggett mode is −2aq ðbq − cÞ=ðbq þ cÞ.
                                                                                             lowers from the high-temperature cubic phase (Fd3̄m). Of
   For its realization, one finds from the above equations                                   particular interest are the ferroelastic transition at 204 K
that even one-dimensional group representations would                                        (which lowers the point group symmetry from m3̄m to
produce this antiphase Higgs mode. To determine the mode                                     mmm, maintaining inversion) and the ferroelectric one at
dispersions requires the addition of gradient terms that                                     196 K (which further lowers the point group symmetry
typically lead to a quadratic dispersion about the ordering                                  to mm2) [29]. At much lower temperatures, two other
wave vector, unless the mode energy at the ordering vector                                   transitions have been reported that are consistent with a
                                                                                             monoclinic space group, probably Cc. Based on group-
                      1.5                                                                    subgroup relations and structural refinements, the accepted
                                                                                             phase transition series with decreasing temperature is
                                                          Soft                               Fd3̄m → Imma → Ima2 → Cc. The complexity of the
                                                          Higgs                              phase diagram and the fact that the polarization direction
                                                                                             is easily reoriented by an external field [29] indicate that
                       1                                  Leggett
        Mode energy

                                                                                             the free-energy landscape is soft, suggesting that this
                                                                                             material is an excellent hunting ground for new collective
                                                                                             modes.
                                                                                                Density functional theory (DFT) calculations (T ¼ 0 K)
                      0.5                                                                    show that Fd3̄m is unstable to both Γ−4 and Γ−5 distortions
                                                                                             (the former being polar in nature). Γ−4 and Γ−5 are both
                                                                                             primary order parameters for the transition from Fd3̄m to
                                                                                             Ima2 [30]. In the ferroelectric phase, the minimum Landau
                       0                                                                     subspace is 6 × 6, given that both Γ−4 and Γ−5 are three-
                            0      0.5            1            1.5            2              dimensional group representations, meaning Cd2 Nb2 O7
                                                T/Tc                                         hosts a richer space of possibilities than the minimal
                                                                                             Landau model discussed earlier [33]. In addition, as we
FIG. 1. Mode energies for the minimal Landau model with                                      demonstrate below, more coupling terms exist besides the
aq ¼ ar , bq ¼ br , and c ¼ bq =2, so that T q ¼ T r ¼ T c . Units                           biquadratic one, a general result not specific to Cd2 Nb2 O7 .
are such that aq0 =T q is set to unity. The Goldstone modes (not                             Before turning to Ima2, we first discuss the related Fdd2
shown) are at zero energy.                                                                   space group which is simpler to present in a Cartesian basis.

                                                                                      011024-3
QUINTIN N. MEIER et al.                                                                         PHYS. REV. X 12, 011024 (2022)

FIG. 2. Crystal structure of cubic Cd2 Nb2 O7 shown to illustrate its two interpenetrating sublattices of NbO6 octahedra and O0 Cd4
tetrahedra with Cd (magenta), Nb (blue), and O (orange) ions.

                            A. Fdd2                                    where Γ−5 is dominant [31], whereas order parameterlike
   The six-dimensional subspace formed by Γ−4 and Γ−5                  behavior of the distortion amplitudes as a function of
defines two free-energy surfaces [Fig. 3(a)]. These surfaces           temperature has only been claimed for Γ−5 based on global
are three-dimensional generalizations of two Mexican-hat               structural refinements [35]. Regardless, the net result is that
potentials [Fig. 3(b)], and can be considered as nested                one has two coupled flat energy surfaces, one for Γ−4 , the
warped spheres, one for Γ−4 , the other for Γ−5 . Each                 other for Γ−5 , which only differ from each other by a few
representation condensing along the cubic axis of its                  meV per formula unit [31].
respective sphere gives rise to Fdd2. Interestingly, Fdd2                 In terms of order parameter directions (Table I), the
has been identified as the local structure of Cd2 Nb2 O7 from          Fdd2 phase corresponds to ða; 0; 0Þjð0; c; 0Þ with ða; 0; 0Þ
diffuse scattering studies [34] and is also the global space           being a point on the Γ−4 sphere and ð0; c; 0Þ on the Γ−5
group upon sulfur doping [31]. But what is evident from                sphere, whereas Ima2 corresponds to ða; a; 0Þjð0; c; −cÞ
both the DFT and structural studies is that there are a                instead. Here, a refers to the Γ−4 order parameter and c to
number of space groups which are close in energy and                   the Γ−5 one. The lower symmetry space group encompass-
provide comparable descriptions of the data. That is, the              ing these two is Cc, corresponding to ða; b; 0Þjð0; c; dÞ,
free-energy landscape of these two coupled spheres is                  which can be seen to correspond to particular great circles
relatively flat (i.e., the warping of the spheres is small).           on each sphere (analogous to the Mexican-hat brims of the
DFT calculations indicate that structures where Γ−4 is                 minimal model). For our purposes here, we restrict our
dominant have a slightly lower free energy than ones                   analysis to these two circles, recognizing that there are also

FIG. 3. Illustration of the Leggett phase mode for Fdd2 with (a) the free-energy surfaces drawn as nested spheres for Γ−4 and Γ−5 ,
whose radii are the amplitudes Q4 and Q5 , and (b) the corresponding Mexican-hat potentials when restricting to Cc. In (a) the Cc
subspace is indicated by great circles on these spheres (which are in reality warped given that Q4 and Q5 depend on the spherical angles).
The Fdd2 minimum in Cartesian coordinates is ðQ4 ; 0; 0Þ on the Γ−4 sphere and ð0; Q5 ; 0Þ on the Γ−5 sphere. In (b) the vertical axis is
energy, with the wavy line indicating the Landau couplings between the two energy surfaces. In both panels, the Goldstone mode
corresponds to oscillations about the Fdd2 minima on each circle (these minima are indicated by black dots) to one Cc domain on one
swing (a red arrow on one surface, a blue arrow on the other) and to another Cc domain on the other swing (a blue arrow on one surface,
a red arrow on the other). The higher energy Leggett mode (antiphason) instead involves oscillations corresponding to antiphase Cc
domains, with one swing involving both red arrows and the other swing involving both blue arrows. A similar picture exists for the
antiphase Higgs mode, with the arrows pointing along the radial directions instead.

                                                               011024-4
LEGGETT MODES ACCOMPANYING CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC PHASE …                                        PHYS. REV. X 12, 011024 (2022)

TABLE I. Space groups generated on condensing the (Γ−4 , Γ−5 )   TABLE II. Fluctuations about Fdd2 and Ima2 derived from
order parameters along various crystallographic directions in    Table I. H denotes fluctuations indicated by the blue and red
Cd2 Nb2 O7 (generated from Ref. [36]).                           arrows along the specific great circles shown on the spheres in
                                                                 Fig. 3. V denotes fluctuations along great circles orthogonal to
Γ−4                         Γ−5                  Space Group     these circles. Note that the circles are turned 90° between the two
ða; 0; 0Þ                 ð0; b; 0Þ                  Fdd2        surfaces because of the different transformation properties of Γ−4
ða; a; 0Þ                ð0; b; −bÞ                  Ima2        and Γ−5 . R denotes fluctuations along the radial directions of the
ða; a; aÞ                 ðb; b; bÞ                   R3         spheres. For Fdd2, the two Cc rows correspond to different Cc
ða; b; 0Þ                 ð0; c; dÞ                   Cc         domains. Also, the reduction to C2 is not shown because it
ða; a; bÞ                ð0; c; −cÞ                   Cm         involves an Fdd2 → P1 → C2 path on the spheres in Fig. 3.
ða; a; 0Þ               ð−c; b; −bÞ                   C2
                                                                 Space group       Symmetry Γ−4      Γ−5            Modes
                                                                 Fdd2 → Fdd2        Γ1 (A1 )     R    R    Higgs, antiphase Higgs
fluctuations orthogonal to them on the spheres correspond-       Fdd2 → Cc          Γ4 (B2 )     H    H    Goldstone, antiphason
ing to rhombohedral (R3) and other monoclinic (Cm and            Fdd2 → Cc          Γ3 (A2 )     V    V    Goldstone, antiphason
C2) space groups, as well as to other domains of Fdd2 and        Ima2 → Ima2        Γ1   (A1 )   R    R    Higgs, antiphase Higgs
Ima2 not represented by these two particular circles             Ima2 → Cc          Γ4   (B2 )   H    H    Goldstone, antiphason
(Table II). That is, we consider a reduced 4 × 4 force-          Ima2 → Cm          Γ3   (A2 )   V         Goldstone
constant matrix. We note that for these flat free-energy         Ima2 → C2          Γ2   (B1 )        V    Goldstone
surfaces, it is often useful to describe each order parameter
with spherical or polar coordinates, but for simplicity in the
following derivations we will use a Cartesian basis instead.     three 2 × 2 blocks: one in the Higgs sector and the other
   We obtain the Landau free energy using the INVARIANTS         two in the Goldstone sector. That is, there are no terms
routine [37] (accessible electronically [36]), noting that       coupling the two Goldstone blocks.
it is important to specify the appropriate Cc domains for           Differentiating Eq. (6) with respect to a, b, c, d and
the subspace considered, specifically the order parameter        setting each expression to zero determines these parameters
directions ða; b; 0Þjð0; c; dÞ. Considering terms to quartic     via a set of coupled equations [27]. One can see from these
order, we obtain                                                 expressions that b ¼ d ¼ 0 (Fdd2) is an allowed solution
                                                                 to these coupled equations. Whether it is or is not depends
      α4 2            α              β                           on the actual values of the Landau coefficients, but for
F¼        ða þ b2 Þ þ 5 ðc2 þ d2 Þ þ 4 ða2 þ b2 Þ2
       2               2              4                          purposes here we assume that this is the case [38].
        γ4 4            β               γ                           The coefficients of the force-constant matrix for each of
      þ ða þ b4 Þ þ ðc2 þ d2 Þ2 þ 5 ðc4 þ d4 Þ
                          5
                                                                 the modes are determined by ð∂ 2 F=∂qi ∂qj Þ, where qi are
        4               4               4
        δ 2                                                      a, b, c, d, evaluated at a ¼ hai, c ¼ hci, b ¼ d ¼ 0. The
                 2    2     2
      þ ða þ b Þðc þ d Þ þ ϵ1 ðabÞðad − bcÞ                      diagonal elements of the force-constant matrix will give the
        2
        ϵ                                                        uncoupled Higgs mode energies (aa and cc elements) and
      þ 2 ða2 c2 þ b2 d2 Þ þ ϵ3 ðabcdÞ þ ϵ4 ðcdÞðad − bcÞ: ð6Þ   Goldstone mode energies (bb and dd elements). Of interest
        2
                                                                 here are the off-diagonal terms. We find that in this case
We note that in polar coordinates, a ¼ Q4 cosðϕ4 Þ,              there are two nonzero ones. The first is the ac one that
b ¼ Q4 sinðϕ4 Þ, c ¼ Q5 cosðϕ5 Þ, d ¼ Q5 sinðϕ5 Þ, where         couples the two Higgs modes:
Qi are the amplitudes and ϕi are the phases.
   We first consider expanding about an assumed Fdd2                                 ∂ 2F
free-energy minimum, and then consider Ima2 next. For                                     ¼ 2ðδ þ ϵ2 ÞðacÞ:                     ð7Þ
                                                                                     ∂a∂c
Fdd2, fluctuations of a and c correspond to Higgs modes
(A1 symmetry), fluctuations of b and d to Goldstone modes        The other is the bd one that couples the two Goldstone
(B2 symmetry) (Table II). Note these Goldstone modes are         modes:
not at zero energy because of the anisotropy terms γ i , so
they are formally pseudo-Goldstone modes. In addition, the
δ (biquadratic) and ϵi terms will provide coupling between                      ∂2F
                                                                                    ¼ ϵ1 ða2 Þ þ ϵ3 ðacÞ − ϵ4 ðc2 Þ:            ð8Þ
the two Higgs modes, and the latter also between the two                       ∂b∂d
Goldstone modes. There is no coupling between the Higgs
and the Goldstone modes, so the 4 × 4 matrix reduces to          For each 2 × 2 block, we denote the diagonal elements
two 2 × 2 blocks: one for the two Higgs modes, one for the       corresponding to the uncoupled mode energies as ω24 (aa or
two Goldstone modes. This remains true when considering          bb) and ω25 (cc or dd). Denoting the off-diagonal element in
sixth-order terms in the free energy, and also for the full      each block as X (ab or cd), one obtains as before coupled
Γ−4 ⊕ Γ−5 space. That is, this larger 6 × 6 matrix reduces to    mode energies of the form

                                                            011024-5
QUINTIN N. MEIER et al.                                                                           PHYS. REV. X 12, 011024 (2022)
                               rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                ω2 þ ω25        ðω24 − ω25 Þ2                             along the radial directions in Fig. 3). That is, the amplitudes
           ω2 ¼ 4                                   þ X2 :        ð9Þ   Q4 and Q5 oscillate either in phase or out of phase, so we can
                   2                     4
                                                                          denote the latter as a Leggett amplitude mode, that is, an
The two eigenvectors of this matrix have the two compo-                   antiphase Higgs mode. Considering the full six-dimensional
nents either in phase or out of phase, as in Eq. (5). The in-             Γ−4 ⊕ Γ−5 space, there are actually two “antiphasons” and one
phase modes then correspond to Higgs and Goldstone                        “antiphase Higgs” mode, as alluded to above.
modes, the out-of-phase modes to their Leggett analogs.
   To understand the two phase modes, consider a given                                              B. Ima2
Fdd2 domain, ða; 0; 0Þjð0; c; 0Þ. The Goldstone mode
                                                                             Although the Fdd2 space group is realized upon sulfur
would correspond to oscillations along the two circles
                                                                          doping [31], stoichiometric Cd2 Re2 O7 is thought to be
on the free-energy spheres toward one Cc domain
                                                                          Ima2 below the ferroelectric transition. The Ima2 case is
ða; b; 0Þjð0; c; dÞ (one swing) and toward another Cc domain
                                                                          similar to the Fdd2. Ima2 corresponds to a ¼ b and
ða; −b; 0Þjð0; c; −dÞ (the other swing) as illustrated in Fig. 3.
                                                                          d ¼ −c. These coordinates represent points on the two
The Leggett analog corresponds instead to oscillations
                                                                          circles in Fig. 3 that are rotated by 45° relative to Fdd2.
toward ða; b; 0Þjð0; c; −dÞ and ða; −b; 0Þjð0; c; dÞ. These
                                                                          Therefore, to construct Goldstone and Higgs variables in a
can be thought of as antiphase domains of Cc that occur at a
higher energy since they are penalized by the coupling terms              Cartesian basis, it is convenient to express F using a p  45°
                                                                                                                                     ffiffiffi
in the Landau free energy. As such, the Leggett phase mode                rotated coordinate                 ffiffiffi is, ã ¼ ða þ p
                                                                                        pffiffiffi frame instead,pthat                 ffiffiffi 2,
                                                                                                                               bÞ=
occurs at a higher energy than the Goldstone mode. We                     b̃ ¼ ða − bÞ= 2, c̃ ¼ ðc − dÞ= 2, d̃ ¼ ðc þ dÞ= 2, so
therefore denote the Leggett phase mode as an antiphason.                 that Ima2 corresponds to b̃ ¼ d̃ ¼ 0. The resulting
A similar picture applies in the Higgs sector (oscillations               Landau free energy is

                     α4 2            α               β                  γ                           β
                F¼     ðã þ b̃2 Þ þ 5 ðc̃2 þ d̃2 Þ þ 4 ðã2 þ b̃2 Þ2 þ 4 ðã4 þ b̃4 þ 6ã2 b̃2 Þ þ 5 ðc̃2 þ d̃2 Þ2
                     2               2                4                  8                           4
                       γ5 4                     δ                            ϵ 1
                     þ ðc̃ þ d̃4 þ 6c̃2 d̃2 Þ þ ðã2 þ b̃2 Þðc̃2 þ d̃2 Þ þ ðã2 − b̃2 Þðb̃ d̃ −ã c̃Þ
                       8                        2                            2
                       ϵ2 2                                   ϵ3 2                       ϵ
                     þ ½ðã þ b̃ Þðc̃ þ d̃ Þ þ 4ã b̃ c̃ d̃ þ ðã − b̃ Þðd̃2 − c̃2 Þ þ 4 ðd̃2 − c̃2 Þðb̃ d̃ −ã c̃Þ:
                                   2   2    2                              2
                                                                                                                                    ð10Þ
                       4                                       4                          2

One can show that, as before, the only off-diagonal terms of                 The Leggett analog of the Higgs mode (the antiphase
the force-constant matrix that survive are the ã c̃ and b̃ d̃            Higgs) has not been explicitly described before. A related
terms. Thus, the force-constant matrix again reduces to two               mode, however, was predicted recently in time-reversal
2 × 2 blocks and results in a Higgs mode, a Goldstone                     breaking superconductors [42]. It should be observable as
mode, and the two Leggett modes: an antiphase Higgs                       well in multiband superconductors, and would correspond
mode and an antiphason. This is straightforward to under-                 to out-of-phase oscillations of the gap amplitudes of the
stand from a study of Fig. 3 and Table I as we summarize                  two bands. We suggest that the existence of this mode be
in Table II.                                                              searched for by appropriate experiments (Raman, pump-
   We now connect these results to those on superconduc-                  probe) on two-band superconductors like MgB2 . Below, we
tors. Upon manipulation of the corresponding dynamical                    address its observation in the structural case.
matrix in the case of superconductivity [22], one can show
that the off-diagonal element for a charge-neutral two-band
                                                                                       C. Secondary order parameters
superconductor is equal to the square root of the product
of the two diagonal elements. This results in one mode                       The secondary order parameters present in Cd2 Nb2 O7
frequency that is zero (the Goldstone mode) and one whose                 are even-parity ones with symmetry Γþ          þ
                                                                                                                 3 and Γ5 . For Cc,
squared frequency is the sum of the two diagonal elements                 this results in a seven-dimensional space: Γ−4 ða; bÞ ⊕
(the Leggett mode). Besides this distinction, there is no                 Γ−5 ðc; dÞ ⊕ Γþ           þ
                                                                                        3 ðe; fÞ ⊕ Γ5 ðgÞ. Expanding around Fdd2
qualitative difference between the superconductivity and                  (b ¼ d ¼ g ¼ 0) and Ima2 (b ¼ a; d ¼ −c; f ¼ 0), no
structural mode cases. In particular, for both cases, the two             couplings exist between the primary Higgs and
components of the eigenvector do not have equal ampli-                    Goldstone modes (that is, the ab; ad; bc; cd terms in the
tudes. In the superconductivity case, this is due to the                  force-constant matrix vanish at the Fdd2 and Ima2
difference in the density of states of the two bands. In the              minima). This means that any coupling between these
structural case, it is because the uncoupled mode frequen-                Higgs and Goldstone modes is beyond the harmonic
cies for Γ−4 and Γ−5 differ.                                              approximation; however, higher-order coupling can occur

                                                                    011024-6
LEGGETT MODES ACCOMPANYING CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC PHASE …                                                        PHYS. REV. X 12, 011024 (2022)

in nonequilibrium situations [19,21]. At first glance, these                                                                       Γ5¯
                                                                                                                                   Γ5¯ Nb (Γ3¯ )
secondary modes shift the various primary mode frequen-                                       0.3
                                                                                                                                   Γ5¯ Cd (Γ3¯ )
cies that would be determined from the smaller 4 × 4 block.

                                                                        Mode amplitude (Å)
                                                                                                                                   Γ4¯ Nb (Γ2¯ )
That is, one can in principle reduce this 7 × 7 matrix to an                                 0.24
                                                                                                                                   Γ4¯ Nb (Γ3¯ )
effective 4 × 4 matrix by integrating out e, f, g in the
                                                                                             0.18
Landau free-energy equations, as these secondary order
parameters are slaved to the primary ones.                                                   0.12
   But closer inspection of the form of the primary-
secondary mode couplings reveals new opportunities to                                        0.06
study the Leggett modes. To see this, note that in the Cc
subspace discussed above, one now has the following                                            0
coupling terms at cubic order since the secondary order                                             100   120   140   160    180    200
parameters have even parity:                                                                               Temperature (K)

                                                                 FIG. 4. Decomposition of the Ima2 structural refinement of
                1 2       2        2    2
     F3 ¼ η1 pffiffiffi ða þ b Þe þ ða − b Þf                            Cd2 Nb2 O7 from Ref. [35] using ISODISTORT [24,36]. Shown is
                 3                                                 the overall Γ−5 (T 2u ) amplitude previously plotted in Ref. [35]
                                                                 along with various Γ−4 (T 1u ) and Γ−5 decompositions involving
                  1 2        2       2    2
           þ η2 pffiffiffi ðc þ d Þe þ ðc − d Þf                         either Nb or Cd ion displacements from their cubic positions,
                   3                                               noting that for each ion, Γ−4 has two submodes Γ−3 (Eu ) and Γ−2
                                              
                                1                                  (A2u ), whereas Γ−5 has only one (Γ−3 ). Curves are proportional to
           þ η3 ðac − bdÞe − pffiffiffi ðac þ bdÞf
                                 3                                 jT c − Tjβ , where T c ¼ 196 K is the ferroelectric transition
                                                                   temperature and β ¼ 0.27 is the order parameter exponent.
           þ η4 ðabgÞ þ η5 ðcdgÞ þ η6 ½ðad − bcÞg:     ð11Þ

For both Fdd2 and Ima2, the η3 term leads to both primary          data or not. To address this, in Fig. 4 we plot the temper-
Higgs and Goldstone mode couplings. For Ima2, the η6               ature dependence of several relevant submode amplitudes
term also leads to both primary Higgs and Goldstone                based on the Ima2 crystal structure refinements of
couplings. We note that Γþ       þ
                          3 and Γ5 are Raman active modes
                                                                   Malcherek et al. [35]. We find that the Cd and Nb
in the cubic phase. Therefore, below the ferroelectric             displacements for both Γ−4 and Γ−5 symmetries scale with
transition, they can be used to drive the primary Leggett          the overall Γ−5 order parameter amplitude that was pre-
modes via these two cubic terms, analogous to nonlinear            viously shown in Ref. [35]. This indicates that this simpler
phononics experiments on perovskites [43] that have been           Landau description is valid.
studied theoretically using similar Landau-like equations             We now turn to the phonons. Since the ions involved
of motion [44–46]. Note that pump-probe experiments                (Cd, Nb, O) have different masses, there is no one-to-one
have been instrumental in the study of Leggett modes in            correspondence between the force-constant modes and the
superconductors [47].                                              phonons (unless the mode involved only one ion type). As a
   In the above analysis, we did not include strain (which         consequence, a given force-constant mode could involve
typically renormalizes the Landau coefficients) and gra-           more than one phonon. However, it has been shown that
dient terms, which need to be included to address domain           there is a strong correspondence between single phonons
walls. One would expect that the collective modes could be         and the Higgs and Goldstone modes in YMnO3 [19].
significantly modified by domain walls if they are spatially       Therefore, it is probable that such modes for Cd2 Nb2 O7 can
broad enough [48] and present at a high enough density.            also be associated with specific phonons.
These effects would be interesting to study in future work.           To gain further insight, we turn to experimental Raman
                                                                   and infrared data. In the Ima2 phase, all phonons are in
                                                                   principle Raman active. Raman data on Cd2 Nb2 O7 find
       D. Submodes and phonons for Cd2 Nb2 O7
                                                                   several low lying A1 and B2 modes below the ferroelectric
   In the real crystal, there are multiple force-constant          transition, three of which soften as the structural phase
matrix eigenmodes for each symmetry, typically referred            transition is approached from below [49]. As the amplitude
to in the literature as “submodes.” The full matrix has a size     modes have A1 symmetry and the phase modes have B2
of 66 × 66. Restricting the symmetry to Cc, the matrix             symmetry, there should be a correlation between our
reduces to 33 × 33. With further restriction to Γ−4 and Γ−5 , it   collective modes and the data. That is, it is possible that
reduces to 24 × 24. In the Landau treatment, each qi is a          the two lowest lying A1 Raman modes correspond to the
particular sum of these submodes with the appropriate              Higgs and antiphase Higgs modes. Presumably the lowest
group symmetry that is gotten by reducing this larger              lying B2 mode is the Goldstone mode, with the antiphason
matrix to the smaller 4 × 4 matrix. Still, one can ask the         corresponding to a higher energy B2 mode that has yet to be
question whether this simplification is supported by the           studied.

                                                             011024-7
QUINTIN N. MEIER et al.                                                                 PHYS. REV. X 12, 011024 (2022)

   The IR data for Cd2 Nb2 O7 are complicated given the         considerations presented here should be valid there as well.
presence of seven optic modes of Γ−4 symmetry in the            The existence of low lying modes would be aided by
cubic phase, which further split in the ferroelectric phase.    having flat energy surfaces with low transition barriers as
Two of the lower lying IR modes have been interpreted as        considered here. In that context, Cd2 Nb2 O7 consists of
being coupled (both above and below the transition) due         corner sharing NbO6 octahedra in an open framework
to their temperature dependencies [50]. One of these,           interpenetrated by CdO tetrahedra that are weakly coupled
referred to as a “central” mode and speculated to be due to     to the octahedra, implying floppy low-energy modes.
hopping of Cd ions among equivalent locations displaced         Going from a cubic phase to a lower symmetry ortho-
from their cubic positions, is not thought to be of Γ−4         rhombic or monoclinic phase is also useful in order to
symmetry given that seven other IR modes of this                optimize the number of coupling terms in the Landau free
symmetry are already seen. Its coupling with a higher           energy. This is particularly pervasive in pyrochlores and
energy second mode, thought to be a Nb displacement             spinels. Cagelike structures as in skutterudites with their
mode of Γ−4 symmetry, drives this central mode to soften at     associated floppy modes would also be a good place to
the ferroelectric transition [50]. Whether this central mode    search. Much of the work concerning Goldstone and Higgs
is an A1 symmetry mode (as typical for an order-disorder        modes has been done in the context of perovskites, which
transition), or instead a Γ−5 mode that becomes IR active       also involve corner sharing octahedra, and a number of
due to coupling to the second Γ−4 mode, is worth inves-         them exhibit improper ferroelectric transitions as refer-
tigating. If the latter, this would be consistent with the      enced above. Similar considerations to ours would also
theory we offer above of two coupled modes of Γ−4 and Γ−5       apply to ferroelastic transitions. However, a large coupling
symmetry. Moreover, as discussed above, pump-probe              to strain usually leads to large warping terms (see, e.g., in
studies of Cd2 Nb2 O7 would be instrumental in probing for      the case of ferroelastic WO3 [58]). A locally flat energy
possible collective modes: Higgs, Goldstone, and their          landscape can sometimes be recovered at Ising-type
Leggett analogs.                                                domain walls (see, e.g., for LiNbO3 [59]). In the same
                                                                way, locally confined Leggett modes could be observed.
     IV. SEARCHING FOR AND OBSERVING
              LEGGETT MODES                                                         V. CONCLUSION
   Although we considered the specific example of                  We demonstrate via a Landau analysis that structural
Cd2 Nb2 O7 , the above analysis should be applicable when-      Leggett modes should exist in the context of displacive
ever more than one primary order parameter is involved in a     transitions when more than one multidimensional group
phase transition. As such, Leggett modes should exist in        representation is involved. These collective modes exist
the structural context, and could be identified from a DFT      not only in the phase channel as in the original work of
analysis of the force-constant and dynamical (phonon)           Leggett, but also in the amplitude channel, representing a
matrices in comparison to experimental data. We plan to         new collective mode, the antiphase Higgs, that should be
report on this in a future paper that will provide a detailed   observable in multiband superconductors as well. We
DFT study of Cd2 Nb2 O7 [51]. In general, analysis of           studied in detail the specific case of the relaxor ferroelectric
Raman and IR data, including the symmetry of the modes          pyrochlore Cd2 Nb2 O7 , which we believe is a promising
and their temperature dependence, should be helpful in          material to search for such modes. We believe there should
elucidating the presence of Leggett modes. Specifics,           be a large group of materials where such modes could
including identifying the out-of-phase behavior character-      exist, and advocate in particular that pump-probe studies
istic of the Leggett modes, could be resolved by pump-          would be the most illuminating way to identify and
probe studies of the phase of the oscillations as a function    characterize these modes. The study of such modes should
of time. Moreover, the equations of motion associated with      give new insight into their associated crystallographic
nonlinear phononics involve the same cubic and quartic          phase transitions.
coupling terms invoked in this paper that provide for the
existence of the Leggett modes to begin with. Driving
                                                                                ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
specific modes would then be instrumental in identifying
the various collective modes via their couplings to the            Work at Argonne National Laboratory was supported by
driven mode.                                                    the Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, Basic
   As for materials, obviously those phase transitions          Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of
involving more than one primary group representation            Energy. Q. N. M. was supported by the Swiss National
would be obvious targets for study, including those             Science Foundation under Project No. P2EZP2_191872.
exhibiting improper and hybrid-improper ferroelectric           Work at ETH Zurich was funded by the European Research
transitions [52–57]. Although the latter typically involve      Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020
order parameters with nonzero wave vector, the Landau           research and innovation program project HERO grant
coupling terms in the free energy are similar and so the        (No. 810451). Work at Northwestern University was

                                                          011024-8
LEGGETT MODES ACCOMPANYING CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC PHASE …                                              PHYS. REV. X 12, 011024 (2022)

supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant                     Sn-Filled Skutterudite SnFe4 Sb12 , Phys. Rev. B 97, 024301
No. DMR-2011208. G. L. gratefully acknowledges support                       (2018).
for this work from Bates College, and from NSF through                [17]   A. Marthinsen, S. M. Griffin, M. Moreau, T. Grande, T.
DMR-1904980.                                                                 Tybell, and S. M. Selbach, Goldstone-like Phonon Modes in
                                                                             a (111)-Strained Perovskite, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 014404
                                                                             (2018).
                                                                      [18]   S. Prosandeev, S. Prokhorenko, Y. Nahas, A. Al-Barakaty,
                                                                             L. Bellaiche, P. Gemeiner, D. Wang, A. A. Bokov, Z.-G. Ye,
 [1] P. W. Anderson, Plasmons, Gauge Invariance, and Mass,                   and B. Dkhil, Evidence for Goldstone-like and Higgs-like
     Phys. Rev. 130, 439 (1963).                                             Structural Modes in the Model PbMg1=3 Nb2=3 O3 Relaxor
 [2] P. W. Anderson, Random-Phase Approximation in the                       Ferroelectric, Phys. Rev. B 102, 104110 (2020).
     Theory of Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 112, 1900 (1958).        [19]   Q. N. Meier, A. Stucky, J. Teyssier, S. M. Griffin, D. van der
 [3] A. Schmid and G. Schön, Linearized Kinetic Equations and                Marel, and N. A. Spaldin, Manifestation of Structural Higgs
     Relaxation Processes of a Superconductor Near T c, J. Low               and Goldstone Modes in the Hexagonal Manganites, Phys.
     Temp. Phys. 20, 207 (1975).                                             Rev. B 102, 014102 (2020).
 [4] D. Pekker and C. Varma, Amplitude/Higgs Modes in                 [20]   X. Zhang, Q.-J. Ye, and X.-Z. Li, Structural Phase
     Condensed Matter Physics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter                    Transition and Goldstone-like Mode in Hexagonal
     Phys. 6, 269 (2015).                                                    BaMnO3 , Phys. Rev. B 103, 024101 (2021).
 [5] A. J. Leggett, Number-Phase Fluctuations in Two-Band             [21]   D. M. Juraschek, Q. N. Meier, and P. Narang, Parametric
     Superconductors, Prog. Theor. Phys. 36, 901 (1966).                     Excitation of an Optically Silent Goldstone-like Phonon
 [6] G. Blumberg, A. Mialitsin, B. S. Dennis, M. V. Klein, N. D.
                                                                             Mode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 117401 (2020).
     Zhigadlo, and J. Karpinski, Observation of Leggett’s Col-
                                                                      [22]   S. Sharapov, V. Gusynin, and H. Beck, Effective Action
     lective Mode in a Multiband MgB2 Superconductor, Phys.
                                                                             Approach to the Leggett’s Mode in Two-Band Supercon-
     Rev. Lett. 99, 227002 (2007).
                                                                             ductors, Eur. Phys. J. B 30, 45 (2002).
 [7] R. V. Carlson and A. M. Goldman, Propagating Order-
                                                                      [23]   D. Orobengoa, C. Capillas, M. I. Aroyo, and J. M. Perez-
     Parameter Collective Modes in Superconducting Films,
                                                                             Mato, AMPLIMODES: Symmetry-Mode Analysis on the Bilbao
     Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 11 (1975).
                                                                             Crystallographic Server, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 820
 [8] P. Wölfle, Order-Parameter Collective Modes in 3He-A,
                                                                             (2009).
     Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1279 (1976).
                                                                      [24]   B. J. Campbell, H. T. Stokes, D. E. Tanner, and D. M. Hatch,
 [9] V. Zavjalov, S. Autti, V. Eltsov, P. Heikkinen, and G.
                                                                             ISODISPLACE: A Web-Based Tool for Exploring Structural
     Volovik, Light Higgs Channel of the Resonant Decay of
                                                                             Distortions, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39, 607 (2006).
     Magnon Condensate in Superfluid (3)He-B, Nat. Commun.
                                                                      [25]   R. Cowley, Structural Phase Transitions I. Landau Theory,
     7, 10294 (2016).
[10] J. F. Scott, Soft-Mode Spectroscopy: Experimental Studies               Adv. Phys. 29, 1 (1980).
     of Structural Phase Transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 83          [26]   We note that the force-constant matrix is related to, but not
     (1974).                                                                 equal to, the dynamical matrix determining
                                                                                                               pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi the phonons,
[11] I. A. Sergienko and S. H. Curnoe, Structural Order Param-               whose elements instead are Φij = M i M j , where M i is the
     eter in the Pyrochlore Superconductor Cd2 Re2 O7, J. Phys.              mass of the ith ion [19]. As such, a given Higgs or
     Soc. Jpn. 72, 1607 (2003).                                              Goldstone mode, defined in terms of the eigenvectors of
[12] C. A. Kendziora, I. A. Sergienko, R. Jin, J. He, V. Keppens,            the force-constant matrix, can be an admixture of several
     B. C. Sales, and D. Mandrus, Goldstone-Mode Phonon                      phonons of the appropriate symmetry [19].
     Dynamics in the Pyrochlore Cd2 Re2 O7 , Phys. Rev. Lett.         [27]   J. Holakovský, A New Type of the Ferroelectric Phase
     95, 125503 (2005).                                                      Transition, Phys. Status Solidi B 56, 615 (1973).
[13] J. Venderley, M. Matty, K. Mallayya, M. Krogstad, J. Ruff,       [28]   The qi are typically given in length units, meaning an
     G. Pleiss, V. Kishore, D. Mandrus, D. Phelan, L. Poudel,                effective mass is needed to convert the force-constant
     A. G. Wilson, K. Weinberger, P. Upreti, M. R. Norman,                   eigenvalues to frequency units.
     S. Rosenkranz, R. Osborn, and E.-A. Kim, Harnessing              [29]   Z. G. Ye, N. N. Kolpakova, J.-P. Rivera, and H. Schmid,
     Interpretable and Unsupervised Machine Learning to                      Optical and Electric Investigations of the Phase Transitions
     Address Big Data from Modern X-Ray Diffraction, arXiv:                  in Pyrochlore Cd2 Nb2 O7 , Ferroelectrics 124, 275 (1991).
     2008.03275.                                                      [30]   The speculated Imma ferroelastic phase exists over a very
[14] J. W. Harter, D. M. Kennes, H. Chu, A. de la Torre, Z. Y.               limited range in temperature and its nature is ambiguous; if
     Zhao, J.-Q. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, A. J. Millis, and D. Hsieh,             Cd2 Nb2 O7 does experimentally adopt Imma symmetry,
     Evidence of an Improper Displacive Phase Transition in                  then it would be driven by a Γþ 5 distortion which is found
     Cd2 Re2 O7 via Time-Resolved Coherent Phonon Spectros-                  not to occur in DFT studies [31,32].
     copy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 047601 (2018).                       [31]   G. Laurita, D. Hickox-Young, S. Husremovic, J. Li,
[15] S. M. Nakhmanson and I. Naumov, Goldstone-like States in                A. W. Sleight, R. Macaluso, J. M. Rondinelli, and M. A.
     a Layered Perovskite with Frustrated Polarization: A First-             Subramanian, Covalency-Driven Structural Evolution in the
     Principles Investigation of PbSr2 Ti2 O7 , Phys. Rev. Lett.             Polar Pyrochlore Series Cd2 Nb2 O7−x Sx , Chem. Mater. 31,
     104, 097601 (2010).                                                     7626 (2019).
[16] Y. Fu, X. He, L. Zhang, and D. J. Singh, Collective-Goldstone-   [32]   M. Fischer, T. Malcherek, U. Bismayer, P. Blaha, and
     Mode-Induced Ultralow Lattice Thermal Conductivity in                   K. Schwarz, Structure and Stability of Cd2 Nb2 O7 and

                                                               011024-9
QUINTIN N. MEIER et al.                                                                         PHYS. REV. X 12, 011024 (2022)

       Cd2 Ta2 O7 Explored by Ab Initio Calculations, Phys. Rev. B     [48] F.-T. Huang, X. Wang, S. M. Griffin, Y. Kumagai,
       78, 014108 (2008).                                                   O. Gindele, M.-W. Chu, Y. Horibe, N. A. Spaldin, and
[33]   M. V. Talanov and V. M. Talanov, Structural Diversity of             S.-W. Cheong, Duality of Topological Defects in Hexagonal
       Ordered Pyrochlores, Chem. Mater. 33, 2706 (2021).                   Manganites, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 267602 (2014).
[34]   T. Malcherek, The Ferroelectric Properties of Cd2 Nb2 O7 :      [49] H. Taniguchi, T. Shimizu, H. Kawaji, T. Atake, M. Itoh, and
       A Monte Carlo Simulation Study, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44,            M. Tachibana, Ferroelectric Phase Transition of Cd2 Nb2 O7
       585 (2011).                                                          Studied by Raman Scattering, Phys. Rev. B 77, 224104
[35]   T. Malcherek, U. Bismayer, and C. Paulmann, The Crystal              (2008).
       Structure of Cd2 Nb2 O7 : Symmetry Mode Analysis of the         [50] E. Buixaderas, S. Kamba, J. Petzelt, M. Savinov, and N.
       Ferroelectric Phase, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 205401             Kolpakova, Phase Transitions Sequence in Pyrochlore
       (2010).                                                              Cd2 Nb2 O7 Studied by IR Reflectivity, Eur. Phys. J. B 19,
[36]   H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, and B. J. Campbell, ISOTROPY              9 (2001).
       Software Suite, https://stokes.byu.edu/iso/isotropy.php.        [51] D. Hickox-Young, G. Laurita, Q. N. Meier, N. A. Spaldin,
[37]   D. M. Hatch and H. T. Stokes, INVARIANTS: Program                    M. R. Norman, and J. M. Rondinelli (unpublished).
       for Obtaining a List of Invariant Polynomials of the            [52] E. Bousquet, M. Dawber, N. Stucki, C. Lichtensteiger,
       Order-Parameter Components Associated with Irreducible               P. Hermet, S. Gariglio, J.-M. Triscone, and P. Ghosez,
       Representations of a Space Group, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36,          Improper Ferroelectricity in Perovskite Oxide Artificial
       951 (2003).                                                          Superlattices, Nature (London) 452, 732 (2008).
[38]   The a, b, c, d coefficients can be determined from DFT [39]     [53] B. Xu, D. Wang, H. J. Zhao, J. Íñiguez, X. M. Chen, and L.
       or extracted from an AMPLIMODES [23,40,41] or ISODISTORT             Bellaiche, Hybrid Improper Ferroelectricity in Multiferroic
       [24,36] analysis of the experimental structural refinements.         Superlattices: Finite-Temperature Properties and Electric-
[39]   S. Artyukhin, K. T. Delaney, N. A. Spaldin, and M. Mostovoy,         Field-Driven Switching of Polarization and Magnetization,
       Landau Theory of Topological Defects in Multiferroic                 Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 3626 (2015).
       Hexagonal Manganites, Nat. Mater. 13, 42 (2014).                [54] L. Bellaiche and J. Íñiguez, Universal Collaborative
[40]   M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, C. Capillas, E. Kroumova, S.          Couplings between Oxygen-Octahedral Rotations and Anti-
       Ivantchev, G. Madariaga, A. Kirov, and H. Wondratschek,              ferroelectric Distortions in Perovskites, Phys. Rev. B 88,
       Bilbao Crystallographic Server: I. Databases and Crystallo-          014104 (2013).
       graphic Computing Programs, Z. Kristallogr. 221, 15 (2006).     [55] N. A. Benedek and C. J. Fennie, Hybrid Improper Ferro-
[41]   M. I. Aroyo, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, J. M. Perez-Mato, and H.         electricity: A Mechanism for Controllable Polarization-
       Wondratschek, Bilbao Crystallographic Server. II. Repre-             Magnetization Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 107204
       sentations of Crystallographic Point Groups and Space                (2011).
       Groups, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 62, 115 (2006).               [56] A. T. Mulder, N. A. Benedek, J. M. Rondinelli, and
[42]   N. R. Poniatowski, J. B. Curtis, A. Yacoby, and P. Narang,           C. J. Fennie, Turning ABO3 Antiferroelectrics into Ferro-
       Spectroscopic Signatures of Time-Reversal Symmetry                   electrics: Design Rules for Practical Rotation-Driven
       Breaking Superconductivity, arXiv:2103.05641.                        Ferroelectricity in Double Perovskites and A3 B2 O7
[43]   M. Först, C. Manzoni, S. Kaiser, Y. Tomioka, Y. Tokura,              Ruddlesden-Popper Compounds, Adv. Funct. Mater. 23,
       R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, Nonlinear Phononics as an               4810 (2013).
       Ultrafast Route to Lattice Control, Nat. Phys. 7, 854 (2011).   [57] J. M. Perez-Mato, M. Aroyo, A. García, P. Blaha, K.
[44]   A. Subedi, A. Cavalleri, and A. Georges, Theory of Non-              Schwarz, J. Schweifer, and K. Parlinski, Competing Struc-
       linear Phononics for Coherent Light Control of Solids,               tural Instabilities in the Ferroelectric Aurivillius Compound
       Phys. Rev. B 89, 220301(R) (2014).                                   SrBi2 Ta2 O9 , Phys. Rev. B 70, 214111 (2004).
[45]   D. M. Juraschek, M. Fechner, and N. A. Spaldin, Ultrafast       [58] N. Mascello, N. A. Spaldin, A. Narayan, and Q. N. Meier,
       Structure Switching through Nonlinear Phononics, Phys.               Theoretical Investigation of Twin Boundaries in WO3 :
       Rev. Lett. 118, 054101 (2017).                                       Structure, Properties, and Implications for Superconduc-
[46]   M. Gu and J. M. Rondinelli, Nonlinear Phononic Control               tivity, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033460 (2020).
       and Emergent Magnetism in Mott Insulating Titanates,            [59] D. Mukherjee, S. Prokhorenko, L. Miao, K. Wang, E.
       Phys. Rev. B 98, 024102 (2018).                                      Bousquet, V. Gopalan, and N. Alem, Atomic-Scale Meas-
[47]   F. Giorgianni, T. Cea, C. Vicario, C. P. Hauri, W. K.                urement of Polar Entropy, Phys. Rev. B 100, 104102
       Withanage, X. Xi, and L. Benfatto, Leggett Mode Con-                 (2019).
       trolled by Light Pulses, Nat. Phys. 15, 341 (2019).

                                                                011024-10
You can also read