Oyster Pond Fire Hall - November 21st, 2018
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
What to Expect Tonight: 1. Board Recap 2. Streetscaping & Beautification Grant 3. Infrastructure Committee • Letter from Councillor Hendsbee 4. New School Site Selection • Update on Business Case • Questions? 5. MPA • Update from Ryan Murphy 6. Guest • Councillor David Hendsbee 7. Upcoming Events • Annual Holiday Wine & Cheese
1. Board Recap: Town Halls: • Monthly, 3rd Wednesday of the month • September • Well-attended (~100 people) • Thorough introduction of Business Case • Comprehensive Q&A session on site- selection • Available to watch on Eastern Shore Cooperator Facebook page
1. Board Recap: Town Halls: • October • Small Business Showcase • Presentations from local businesses on what they have to offer • Networking opportunities
1. Board Recap (continued): Board Member Resignation • Ms. Kristina Oje • “My other commitments … have become too great for me to be able to fulfill the requirements of my position on the Board…” • “It has been my pleasure being a part of the MHACCCA Board. I am so proud of all we have accomplished in the past few years, and I have no doubt the board will continue these successes in the future.” The Board of Directors is grateful for Kristina’s volunteer efforts, in particular her time as Secretary and her vision & execution of the 2018 Business Excellence Awards Gala.
1. Board Recap (continued): Board of Director Meetings: • We continue to meet regularly – typically by-weekly. • Recently, our Board Meetings have focussed almost entirely on the School Site Selection process • Generating the Business Case • Post-unveiling feedback • Media requests • Sheldon MacLeod Show • Eastern Shore Cooperator • How to best respond to negative/unhelpful comments • How to ensure the facts are properly conveyed • What next? • … details to follow in the Site Selection portion of the agenda.
2. Streetscaping & Beautification Grant So…what did we apply for & what are we getting? • Banners • 100 pole banners from Hwy 107 to Smith Settlement • Signage • Variety of signs (wayfinding & WIFI) • Removal of sign pollution • Trees/Bushes • 30 fruit-bearing tress & 20 fruit-bearing bushes • Planter Boxes • Nine wooden planter boxes located though the core of MH • Bench Refurbishments • Repairs to existing benches at Train Station & Community Garden
3. Infrastructure Committee: Update on Waste Water Treatment Facility @ Twin Oaks Recap: • January/18: Report from exp consulting • March/18: Letter to Jamie Burns, Regional Director of NSE • April/18: Response from Mr. Burns indicating: 1. The Approval Holder (NSHA) is currently in compliance. 2. Quarterly averages in 2017 met all limits. 3. NSE is not aware of any other sewage or sediment releases in the Inlet. • June/18: Received copies of: • System Assessment Report (dated January 3rd, 2018 • NSE Inspection Report (dated March 7th, 2018) • NSE Inspection Action Plan (not dated)
3. Infrastructure Committee: Update on Waste Water Treatment Facility @ Twin Oaks • Since: • Infrastructure Committee received funds from the MH Common Area Rate to perform additional testing. • Hired Atlantic Water Investigators to perform the following: • July/18: Dye Testing at ESDH • July/August/18: Water quality testing at 2 locations leading into the Inlet
3. Infrastructure Committee: Update on Waste Water Treatment Facility @ Twin Oaks Dye Testing @ Eastern Shore District High: • Results: • Confirmed that at least one of the rooftop storm drains is flowing directly into the Sewer Lift Pump Station.
3. Infrastructure Committee: Update on Waste Water Treatment Facility @ Twin Oaks Water Quality Testing @ two locations upstream from Inlet: • Results: • Escherichia Coli (E-Coli) & Fecal Coliforms present in most samples
3. Infrastructure Committee: Update on Waste Water Treatment Facility @ Twin Oaks What’s next: • NSH & HRCE communication to rectify stormwater flowing into sewer lift station • Councillor Hendsbee sent a letter to homeowners along Petpeswick Inlet indicating the following:
3. Infrastructure Committee: Update on Waste Water Treatment Facility @ Twin Oaks (….preamble, 5 copies of the letter here this evening for your perursal) However, engineering calculations indicate that the WWTF operating problems do not fully account for all the levels of bacterial pollution that have been measured in the inlet. It is likely that there may be deficiencies in private septic systems adjacent to Little River and Petpeswick Inlet that are also contributing to the problem. As an abutting property owner along Little River and/or Petpeswick Inlet, we are asking you to check and ensure that your septic system complies with provincial regulations and is functioning properly. A simple dye test would easily indicate any leakage issues. This website may be helpful: https://novascotia.ca/nse/wastewater/docs/Homeowners.Guide.to.Septic.Syst ems.pdf
3. Infrastructure Committee: Update on Waste Water Treatment Facility @ Twin Oaks Next spring it is anticipated that the Nova Scotia Department of Environment will undertake steps to identify possible properties that may require septic system repairs or upgrades. Having clean, safe waters for recreational use is in everyone’s best interests. I would appreciate your cooperation and assistance in achieving this goal. With Councillor Hendsbee and MLA Murphy’s assistance, we will continue to update our membership & the general public on progress.
4. New School Site Selection: Business Case Our approach: Produce a fact-based document, from a student-first perspective, touching on the following topics: • Physical site & Potential new sites • Proximity to: • Hospital & Ambulance Depot • RCMP & Fire Department • HRM Library • Recreation & Culture, including: • Trails • Beaches • Fitness Center • Recreation Center • Yacht Club • Train Station & Old School • Commercial District • Availability of goods/services • Employment • Volunteerism
4. New School Site Selection: Business Case Our approach: Supported with data relating to the following topics: • HRM Zoning • Future Development Plans • Affordable Housing • Enrollment statistics & Census data • Community Facility use • Transportation issues & Bussing concerns • Water quality & quantity • Business & Individual letters of support (over 100, with more to be delivered)
4. New School Site Selection: Business Case Our goal: • The Business Case is well-received & does not slow the process • No desire to pit community vs. community • No desire to delay breaking ground • Serves as a valuable document & significant reference within the site-selection process • We do not know what the site-selection will look like, but we remain optimistic for a transparent process, requiring public participation.
4. New School Site Selection: Business Case Delivered to: • Minister & Deputy Ministers: • Education • Transportation • Health • Labour • Community Services • Communities, Culture & Heritage • Premier • Leaders NDP & PC Parties • All members HRM Council • Member of Parliament • Senator Tom McInnis • HRM Planning & Development
4. New School Site Selection: Business Case Response & Feedback: • Generally positive • Many agree that Musquodoboit Harbour is the ideal location for students within the catchment area • Many disagree, and cite the following reasons: • We are biased • Higher population on western side of catchment area • HRCE (former HRSB) Long Range Outlook is flawed • Baragar Demographics • Seven Lakes & Nature Ridge not considered • Province is aiming to situate new schools on 80-100 acre parcels to allow for expansion
4. New School Site Selection: Business Case Digging deeper: We are biased. • Our Mission: “To promote and enhance the economic, social and civic well-being of Musquodoboit Harbour & surrounding communities” As a result, to a certain degree we are. However, were diligent in focusing on the Business Case from a student’s point of view. Higher population on western side of catchment. • Correct. ESDH has historically had more students from the west than the east. • Does not change the fact that Musquodoboit Harbour is nearly the perfect geographic center of the catchment area and offers services & amenities that significantly benefit the student body.
4. New School Site Selection: Business Case HRCE (former HRSB) Long Range Outlook – June 2018 Population projections are flawed, inaccurate and do not include Nature Ridge & Seven Lakes Developments. • Nature Ridge (Sugarwood Court, Porters Lake) is included as a “New Residential Development” on page 233 of the 2018 Long Range Outlook. • While Seven Lakes is not officially noted as a “New Residential Development”, it is noted there are currently 74 lots in Seven Lakes – 27 sold & 7 with deposits received. (Seven Lakes website) • HRCE uses Baragar Systems, a BC-based data solutions company, for their long-range (10-year) enrollment projections. • HRCE stands behind the Long Range Outlook, and has a testimonial on the Baragar Systems website. (baragar.com)
4. New School Site Selection: Business Case Province aiming to situate new schools on 80-100 acre parcels to allow for expansion. • There is currently no school site selection process, nor has the government published anything indicating the desire to locate new schools on a specific size property. • Currently: • ESDH: 8.9 acres • MRHS: 25.95 acres • DMHS: 12.78 acres
4. New School Site Selection: Business Case What’s next: • Ongoing advocation from a student point of view • Promoting the Business Case arguments to a broader audience • Publish supplementary information supporting our student-first approach • Continue to communicate with MLA Murphy as we await the site selection process to be announced
4. New School Site Selection: Questions? We are happy to answer as many questions as we possibly can regarding site selection.
5. Marine Protected Area (MPA) Update from MHACCCA representative on the MPA Advisory Committee: Mr. Ryan Murphy
5. Marine Protected Area (MPA) MPA Area of Interest (AOI) Advisory Committee • The MHACCCA has one seat of over 30 seats total on the MPA Area-Of-Interest (AOI) Advisory Committee. • Representatives on the AOI Advisory Committee include a number of Community groups, Fishing Groups, other Marine Harvesting groups, First Nations/Indigenous Peoples, NGO’s, Municipal, Provincial & Federal governments, and universities. • The Committee was set up to “serve as the primary consultative body for the MPA establishment process, although other existing DFO consultative processes will also be used to ensure broad input.” • The consultation process is still in its early stages. The advisory committee has only met once to date, on September 13th. The process is expected to extend to 2020.
5. Marine Protected Area (MPA)
5. Marine Protected Area (MPA) Current Stage • DFO is currently working on running the area’s activities through its risk assessment process. • We’ve been told that we should have some information on the prominent fishing activities (i.e. lobster fishing) before the end of the year. • The next advisory committee meeting will be scheduled once the risk assessment is completed.
5. Marine Protected Area (MPA) Where can I learn more? • DFO has created a page on their website dedicated to the Eastern Shore Islands Area of Interest. Visit our website mhacc.ca/mpa for a link to that DFO webpage and also the newsletter that was released by DFO about the Area of Interest.
5. Marine Protected Area (MPA): FAQs Will the MPA shut down fisheries on the Eastern Shore? DFO’s Answer: No. • DFO is working closely with the local fishing industry to ensure there will be no impacts to jobs or the ability to make a living along the Eastern Shore. • All activities are subject to the ecological risk assessment, but based on experience with similar MPAs, DFO is confident that lobster and other traditional fixed-gear fishing (herring gillnet, groundfish longline), dive fisheries, recreational fisheries, and Food, Social and Ceremonial (FSC) fisheries will be allowed to continue within a future Eastern Shore Islands MPA.
5. Marine Protected Area (MPA): FAQs Do all MPAs need to have a “no take zone”? DFO’s Answer: No, MPAs do not require “no take zones” in order to be effective. • Although these types of zones are commonly used in protected areas around the world, there are also examples of effective MPAs that do not include such measures. • DFO is working closely with the fishing industry and others on the design of a potential MPA to ensure effective protection while also avoiding economic impacts to communities.
6. Guest: Councillor David Hendsbee The Man with the Van, always know where I am
Next Meeting: MHACCCA Meeting of Special Resolution & Holiday Wine & Cheese Wednesday, December 12th, 2018 Worthington Place Resort & Spa 78 Clamshell Road, MH | 7:00pm
www.mhacc.ca www.musquodoboitharbour.ca info@mhacc.ca
You can also read