Oxygenated Fuels in Compression Ignition Engines
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
C OVER STORY Fuel s Oxygenated Fuels in Compression Ignition Engines Internal combustion engine technology can also be applied in order to meet future greenhouse gas and pollutant emission targets, if the fuel characteristics are included as free parameters within the optimization of the powertrain. Therefore, a BMWi-funded consortium investigated oxygenated low-carbon fuels for the application in compression ignition engines, in order to study their combustion and pollutant formation properties on the engine and within a vehicle application. © Ford 26
MOTIVATION powered by synthetic fuels from renew able sources are promising in addition The reduction and avoidance of Green to disruptive concepts such as battery house Gases (GHG) has become one of electric vehicles. the most important technology drivers for industrial applications worldwide REQUIREMENTS FOR to limit global warming. In particular SUSTAINABLE SYNTHETIC FUELS the transport sector, which is one of the major contributors to GHG emissions, Renewable synthetic fuels have become is in the focus of political and social an important subject to powertrain debates. Additional efforts are required research in recent years. However, in order to reduce CO2 concentration selection the most promising fuel can in the atmosphere and thus limit glo didates for future vehicle applications bal warming. Evolutionary approaches requires specific criteria to bundle based on internal combustion engines research and development resources. Those are: –– Actual CO2 reduction: Synthetic fuels AUTHORS must show CO2 reduction on the vehi cle usage for short-term introduction, as CO2 legislation is currently tank- to-wheel-based. Applications of syn thetic fuels should therefore not exceed the CO2 emission of current fossil fuels (diesel as benchmark). Dr.-Ing. Werner Willems –– Reduction of pollutants: New fuels is Technical Spezialist Sustainable should not only avoid CO2 emission, Fuels Research at the Ford but also pollutants. Research and Innovation Center –– Availability and costs: CO2 avoidance in Aachen (Germany). is a problem which requires immidiate action. The development of standards for new fuels and the introduction into type approval regulations require time and effort. Therefore, standardized fuels, which are available globally and at reasonable costs, should be favored. Dipl.-Ing. Marcel Pannwitz is Development Engineer in the Hence, dimethyl ether (DME, CH3-O-CH3) division Thermodynamics & and oxymethylene ether (OME1, CH3-O- Powertrain Concepts of CH2-O-CH3) were identified as suitable IAV GmbH in Berlin (Germany). and promising fuels for applications in diesel engines. Thus, they were selected for the investigations. DME AS AN ALTERNATIVE FUEL FOR COMPRESSION IGNITION ENGINES Marius Zubel, M. Sc. DME was investigated from fundamen is Research Assistant at the tal high-pressure chamber tests over Chair of Internal Combustion Engines of the RWTH Aachen single/multi-cylinder engine tests up to University in Aachen (Germany). vehicle demonstration in order to assess its potential as diesel fuel replacement within the framework of the project. In the following, the physical and chemi cal properties of DME as the most pro mising methyl ether will be discussed. Dr.-Ing. Jost Weber PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL is Department Head diesel System at the Denso Automotive PROPERTIES OF DME Deutschland GmbH in the Aachen Engineering Center It should be noted that due to the in Wegberg (Germany). high oxygen content (34.8 % m/m) MTZ worldwide 03|2020 27
C OVER STORY Fuel s and the absence of C-C bonds for DME, – Unit EN590 diesel DME an almost soot-free combustion can be Boiling point °C 180–350 -24.8 achieved. Consequently, higher Exhaust Gas Recirculation rates (EGR) can be Cetane number - 51–54 55–60 utilized in order to reduce NOx emis Density (15 °C) kg/m³ 830 671 sion simultaneously. TABLE 1 shows Oxygen content % m/m
FIGURE 1 Optical investigations of the mixture preparation in the high-pressure chamber [2] (© RWTH Aachen University) The act uation duration of the injector to the stronger cooling effect of the fuels and nozzle configurations. The was ten = 1000 µs and the rail pressure evaporating jet. start of actuation and duration of the was set to 1000 bar. Diesel fuel shows a injector as well as the EGR rate were significantly longer liquid jet than DME adapted depending on the fuel and SINGLE-CYLINDER when comparing the LPL using the ref nozzle size in order to keep the center ENGINE INVESTIGATIONS erence nozzle (PC-HPC-D). This can be of heat release constant. Only a single related to the lower boiling point and For the experimental combustion main injection was applied for the tests vapor pressure of DME. Here, the vapor invest igations, a single-cylinder on the single-cylinder engine, in con pressure is very close to the ambient engine was derived from the corre trast to the standard mapping of the pressure in the chamber. The phase sponding multi-cylinder engine. It multi-cylinder engine. FIGURE 2 shows change of DME from liquid to gaseous was equipped with the adapted injec the comparison between the diesel refer occurs almost immediately, resulting tion system components. Characteris ence measurement and DME with two in a shortened LPL. A significant influ tic load points based on mapping data different nozzle hole diameters. The die ence on the LPL at DME was observed from the series diesel engine were sel baseline was measured with the ref for the nozzle with the larger hole dia selected. In the following, an operat erence nozzle (PC-D) of the series con meter (PC-HPC-2.5). While the penetra ing point at medium load for diesel figuration. The adapted nozzles for com tion depth of the liquid diesel jet showed and DME will be analyzed in detail. pensation of the physical properties and only a small increase, significant differ The engine boundary conditions injection pressure (PC-1.8 and PC-2.5) ences could be observed for DME due were not changed for the different were investigated for DME. The EGR rate Diesel (PC-D) DME (PC-1.8) DME (PC-2.5) 4 2,0 8 12 FIGURE 2 EGR variation ISCO [g/kWh] ∆p [bar/°CA] (n = 1750 rpm; IMEP = 8.6 bar) ISHC [g/kWh] 3 1,5 6 10 FSN [-] of diesel baseline (PC-D), 2 1,0 4 8 DME with scaled nozzle (PC-1.8 und PC-2.5) 1 0,5 2 6 (© RWTH Aachen University) 0 0,0 0 4 45 2,5 65 550 BD5-90 [°CA] 43 2,0 50 500 Texh [°C] ηi [%] λ spindt 41 1,5 35 450 39 1,0 20 400 37 0,5 5 350 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 ISNOx [g/kWh] ISNOx [g/kWh] ISNOx [g/kWh] ISNOx [g/kWh] MTZ worldwide 03|2020 29
C OVER STORY Fuel s Engine specification Unit Ford 1.5-l I4 88 kW TDCi Compression ignition, Combustion system – four-stroke Engine displacement cm³ 1499 Rated power kW at rpm 88 at 3600 Maximum torque Nm at rpm 270 at 1500–2500 Compression ratio – 16.0 Stroke mm 88.3 Bore mm 73.5 Boosting system – VTG (single-stage) Exhaust gas recirculation – High-pressure, cooled system TABLE 3 Specification of the test engine (© Ford) was adjusted to achieve different specific in case of high-temperature pyrolysis [3]. a lower pressure rise. This behavior NOx emission levels (ISNOX). The specific HC (ISHC) and CO emis can be explained by the shorter burn No soot emission corresponding to sions (ISCO) are of similar magnitude ing duration (BD5-90). However, the the Filter Smoke Number (FSN) could be for all three cases. The HC emission of smaller nozzle (PC-1.8) showed higher detected even at minimal NOx emission DME is lower compared to diesel fuel EGR tolerances compared to the larger level for both nozzle configurations with only at low EGR rates. However, the one (PC-2.5). Thus, it appears more DME, FIGURE 2. This behavior is due to maximum pressure rise rate shows dif advantageous for usage. Another big the fast mixture formation, the high oxy ferences between the three configura difference between DME and diesel lies gen content and the missing C-C bonds tions. The measurements with DME in the difference regarding indicated effi [1]. The missing C-C bonds lead to the for show higher values despite the higher ciency (ηi), FIGURE 2. DME has a higher mation of CO instead of soot precursors cetane number, which usually leads to efficiency relative to diesel, due to the FIGURE 3 Required modifications of the engine hardware (© IAV) 30
shorter burning duration and lower ing duration and the resulting lower smaller than 350 bar did not result in exhaust gas temperature (Texh). exhaust gas temperature of DME rela further benefits. A similar trend could tive to diesel fuel. Therefore, the opti be observed for the variation of the cen mization had to be performed at a ter of heat release, as an advanced timing MULTI-CYLINDER ENGINE INVES relatively high specific NOx emission helped to increase the efficiency at simi TIGATIONS FOR THE PASSENGER (2.0 g/kWh) in order to ensure enough lar CO emission level. The variation of CAR DME APPLICATION flexibility regarding the VTG position. the air-to-fuel ratio showed that lean A Ford 1.5-l diesel engine was used for A rail pressure reduction to 350 bar combustion should take place at least the engine tests on the dyno and within with simultaneous adjustment of start at λ = 1.5. Stoichiometric combustion the vehicle. The technical specifications of injection showed advantages in comparable to gasoline engines could of the multi-cylinder engine are shown terms of CO and efficiency. The indi not be achieved, due to the decrease in in TABLE 3. The engine hardware had to cated high-pressure cycle efficiency efficiency and the significantly increased be adapted to the DME injection compo decreased with reduced rail pressure CO emission. The latter was well above nents, FIGURE 3. The greatest challenge as expected, but the effective engine effi the value of modern DI gasoline engines. was the integration of the high-pressure ciency increased. This can be explained Additional exhaust gas components were pump. The pump was lubricated by the on the one hand by reduced friction measured with a particle counter and a engine oil due to the lack of lubricity of losses due to lower drive power demand Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer DME. The belt drive had to be adapted of the high pressure pump. On the other (FTIR). The CH4 emission downstream due to the different phasing position of hand, the combustion duration increased of the diesel oxidation catalyst was not the pump. Moreover, new sensors and in comparison to the base measurement affected by the variation of rail pressure actuators for controlling the high-pres with 720 bar. Consequently, the exhaust and center of heat release. However, it sure fuel system had to be integrated enthalpy increased enabling a higher increased with decreasing air-to-fuel into the engine control system to enable turbocharger efficiency. Thus, the gas ratio and found its maximum of about engine operation under steady-state and exchange losses decreased. A further 140 ppm at λ = 1.1. The further reduc transient conditions. The engine control reduction in rail pressure to values tion of the air-fuel ratio to λ = 1.0 led to a system, except for the injection parame ters, remained in the serial engine con trol unit whereas a separate second Diesel DME n = 2000 rpm, BMEP = 7.0 bar, NOx = 2.0 g/kWh = constant, soot = 0.0 FSN unit controlled the DME injection sys tem. The communication between both Rail pressure variation αh50Variation λ Variation Base rail pressure: 720 bar Base α Base λ: 1.74 control units is ensured by a specific h50 : 18 ° CA CAN interface. λ: 1.74 λ: 1.74 λ: varied αh50 : 18 ° CA αh50 : varied αh50 : 14 ° CA The measurements on the multi- Rail pressure: varied Rail pressure: 350 bar Rail pressure: 350 bar cylinder engine were conducted at ten part load and three full load operat 4 4 4 raw emission CO [g/kWh] ing points. A representative operating point (n = 2000 rpm, BMEP = 7 bar) 2 2 2 will be discussed for DME operation to show exemplarily the approach for cali 0 0 0 45 45 45 bration optimization, FIGURE 4. Varia tions of the rail pressure, the center of ηe [%] 35 35 35 heat release and the combustion air-to- fuel ratio at constant NOx emission have 25 25 25 been conducted, while roughly main 105 105 105 raw emission taining the diesel reference calibration PN [#/cm3] and boundary conditions. The tests 104 104 104 with DME have been done without the use of a pilot injection in contrast to the 103 103 103 tailpipe emission tailpipe emission base measurement with diesel fuel, as 200 200 200 CH4 [ppm] the single-cylinder engine test results 100 100 100 showed promising trends from an engine noise point of view by applying 0 0 0 low rail pressure in combination with 40 40 40 high EGR rates, when using the smaller NH3 [ppm] nozzle hole diameter. 20 20 20 The aim of the individual variations was to achieve a maximum possible 0 0 0 efficiency with lowest CO emission. 200 350 500 650 800 5 10 15 20 25 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Rail pressure [bar] αh50 [° CA] λ The turbocharger was one of the limit ing factors because of the shorter burn FIGURE 4 Optimization for n = 2000 rpm, BMEP = 7.0 bar at constant NOx emission (© IAV) MTZ worldwide 03|2020 31
C OVER STORY Fuel s DME optimized Diesel n = 2000 rpm, BMEP = 7.0 bar 4 8 20 20 FSN [-] 2 dp/dα [bar/°CA] 6 15 15 CO [g/kWh] CO2 [%] 0/2 4 10 10 HC [g/kWh] 1 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 50 2.5 65 550 45 2.0 50 500 BD5-90 [°CA] Texh [°C] ηe [%] 40 1.5 35 450 λ 35 1.0 20 400 30 0.5 5 350 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 NOx [g/kWh] NOx [g/kWh] NOx [g/kWh] NOx [g/kWh] FIGURE 5 EGR-variation after optimization for n = 2000 rpm, BMEP = 7.0 bar (© IAV) reduction of CH4 to an emission level modern DI gasoline engines but tended relative to diesel fuel. The CO emission near the detection limit. Here, the to be of same magnitude or even higher was still high. The map-wide calibra exhaust gas temperature increased at other operating points, FIGURE 4. tion based on the optimization of the substantially (approximately 550 °C) The final EGR variation was carried steady-state operating points, which so that the threshold value for CH4 con out based on the findings of the optimi implies the use of a deNOx system version in the catalyst was exceeded. zation, FIGURE 5. The effective engine and a diesel particulate filter, is shown However, this threshold value could not efficiency with optimized calibration in FIGURE 6. be reached at low loads, due to the over was almost the same as that of the die A demonstrator vehicle based on a all lower exhaust gas temperature level. sel-powered counterpart. DME offered Ford Mondeo with adapted engine hard The raw emission of the Particulate an advantage in terms of CO2 emission ware and tank system was developed Number (PN) remained well below of due to the more favorable H/C-ratio for the final prove of concept. It exhib NOx [g/kWh] FSN [-] HC [g/kWh] CO [g/kWh] 24 Series full load 18 curve with 5.0 BMEP [bar] diesel fuel 3.5 12 1.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 6 0.5 1 1.5.0 15 0 10 4.0 2 25 0 ηe [%] λ dp/dα [bar/°CA] Texh [°C] 24 700 18 2 BMEP [bar] 1. 600 4 3 5 12 1. 1.3 500 34 4 40 5 1. 6 400 6 32 1.6 1.8 300 25 0 2.0 200 FIGURE 6 DME 2 0 engine maps (© IAV) 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 50 50 50 50 10 15 20 25 10 25 15 20 10 15 20 25 10 15 20 25 Engine speed [rpm] Engine speed [rpm] Engine speed [rpm] Engine speed [rpm] 32
FIGURE 7 Emission improve- ment of DME relative to diesel in WLTC (© IAV) ited the findings from the multi-cylinder as sustainable fuels for diesel engine engine investigations. applications in passenger cars and com The emission potential of DME com pared to diesel fuel in WLTC is shown mercial vehicles in the “XME-diesel” project. DME in particular proved to be THANKS in FIGURE 7 and evaluated with regard a promising candidate as a substitute for The authors thank the German Federal Ministry of to raw emissions of particulates and fossil diesel fuel, considering different Economics and Energy for their support of the NOx as well as for CO2 emission down requirements for future sustainable fuel project and TÜV Rheinland, especially Dr. Bernhard stream of the exhaust aftertreatment solutions for combustion engines (TtW Koonen, and the Forschungsvereinigung Verbren- system. The soot/NOx trade-off of the CO2 and emission reduction, available nungskraftmaschinen (FVV) for their organizational classic diesel combustion was no lon standards, global availability and low support. In addition, the authors the authors would ger present for DME combustion. The costs). The performance of DME from like to thank their partners from the Technical particulate mass could be brought to basic injection chamber measurements University of Munich, Dr. Martin Härtl, Kai Gaukel, zero emission level, while NOx emis to single-cylinder and multi-cylinder M. Sc., and Dominik Pelerin, M. Sc., who covered sion relative to diesel operation could tests to a demonstrator vehicles (Ford the heavy-duty applications in the project as well as also be reduced significantly (-33%). Mondeo) were analyzed and demon Oberon Fuels and Prins-Westport, who supported The CO2 emission level remained strated within the project. the project as well. almost the same. A low pollutant emis sion and nearly CO2-neutral operation REFERENCES could be achieved by providing the fuel [1] Westbrook, C. K.; Pitz, W. J.; Curran, H. J.: Chemical kinetic modeling study of the effects from regenerative sources (E-DME) and of oxygenated hydrocarbons on soot emissions a well-to-wheel consideration. from diesel engines. In: The journal of physical chemistry A (2006), 110 (21), pp. 6912–6922 [2] Ottenwaelder, T.; Pischinger, S.: Effects of CONCLUSION Biofuels on the Mixture Formation and Ignition Process in diesel-Like Jets. SAE Technical Paper As part of the technical program „Neue 2017-01-2332, 2017 Fahrzeug- und Systemtechnologien“ [3] Fischer, S. L.; Dryer, F. L.; Curran, H. J.: The reaction kinetics of dimethyl ether. In: funded by the German Federal Ministry High-temperature pyrolysis and oxidation of Economics and Energy, methyl ether in flow reactors. In: International Journal of fuels (DME/OME1) were investigated Chemical Kinetics (2000), 32, pp. 713-740 MTZ worldwide 03|2020 33
You can also read