One bed, two dreams Fonterra in China - Rod Oram's lecture to the University of Auckland's

Page created by Shane Davis
 
CONTINUE READING
One bed, two dreams Fonterra in China - Rod Oram's lecture to the University of Auckland's
One bed,
                                                             two dreams
                                                                     Fonterra
                                                                     in China

                                           Rod Oram’s lecture to the University of Auckland’s
Rod.Oram@NZ2050.com / Twitter @RodOramNZ     North Asia Centre for Asia-Pacific Excellence
     +64 21 444 839 / Kiwiki on Facebook              Auckland, May 29th , 2018
One bed, two dreams Fonterra in China - Rod Oram's lecture to the University of Auckland's
Two Chinese proverbs
• "It doesn't matter whether a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice.”
      • Deng Xiao Ping

• “One bed, two dreams” – Chinese proverb about ill-matched partners

• Some earlier foreign investment disasters in China I’ve reported on:
    • …such as Unilever in the early 1990s
    • …late-1990s onwards Fletcher Steel, Lion Nathan, Carter Holt, and AFFCO
    • But a few successes too, which I researched for the Asia NZ Foundation in 2011
    •   http://www.asianz.org.nz/media-release/nz-companies-lack-skills-make-most-
        asia%E2%80%99s-rapid-growth-report
One bed, two dreams Fonterra in China - Rod Oram's lecture to the University of Auckland's
Newsroom columns on Fonterra & Beingmate
October 1, 2017: Fonterra fails basic tests
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2017/09/30/51025/rod-oram-fonterra-failing-basic-tests

January 28, 2018: Beingmate goes from bad to worse for Fonterra
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2018/01/27/78078/beingmate-goes-from-bad-to-worse-for-fonterra

February 4, 2018: Beingmate blames Fonterra for its losses
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2018/02/01/80038/beingmate-blames-fonterra-for-its-losses

February 18, 2018: How Fonterra hit the wall in China
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2018/02/17/89248/rod-oram-how-fonterra-hit-the-wall-in-china

March 10, 2018: Fonterra’s big, big Beingmate problems
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2018/03/10/95465/rod-oram-fonterras-big-big-beingmate-problems

March 22, 2018: Fonterra’s selective and unrealistic view
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2018/03/22/99084/fonterras-selective-and-unrealistic-view

April 1, 2018: ‘To lose millions is bloody incompetence’
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2018/03/31/101579/to-lose-millions-is-bloody-incompetence

March 22, 2018: Bernard Hickey: Spierings-Wilson era at Fonterra was no great success
https://pro.newsroom.co.nz/articles/2591-the-spierings-wilson-era-at-fonterra-was-no-great-success
One bed, two dreams Fonterra in China - Rod Oram's lecture to the University of Auckland's
Agenda

  • Fonterra’s (unsolved) strategic challenge

  • Sanlu
  • Beingmate Baby & Child Food

  • Capital & Governance
One bed, two dreams Fonterra in China - Rod Oram's lecture to the University of Auckland's
Fonterra’s unsolved strategic challenge
• Fonterra is the 2nd largest dairy processor in the world

• But Fonterra ranks 18th in the 20 largest dairy companies by sales revenue per
  kilogram of milk, in the 2016 IFCN rankings

• Fonterra lags 40% below the US$1 per kg average revenue for the 20 largest
  processors in the world

• Fonterra’s generates only 60 US cents of revenue per kg of milk
    • Top 5: Danone US$2.40, Nestlé US$1.90, Mengnui and Yili (China’s two
      largest dairy companies) US$1.40, and Groupe Lactalis of France US$1.30
One bed, two dreams Fonterra in China - Rod Oram's lecture to the University of Auckland's
• https://www.dairyglobal.net/Articles/General/2016/7/Who-are-the-top-20-milk-processors-
  2836106W/
One bed, two dreams Fonterra in China - Rod Oram's lecture to the University of Auckland's
Agenda

  • Fonterra’s (unsolved) strategic challenge

  • Sanlu
  • Beingmate Baby & Child Food

  • Capital & Governance
One bed, two dreams Fonterra in China - Rod Oram's lecture to the University of Auckland's
2006:
Fonterra’s
high hopes
for Sanlu
• After many years
  of negotiations,
  with Sanlu,
  Fonterra took a
  43% stake in it in
  December 2005
  for $150m            https://chinaeconomic
                        review.com/feeding-
                                china/
• Sanlu had been
  China’s top
  domestic seller of
  infant formula for
  more than a
  decade

• Fonterra had high
  hopes for Sanlu
  becoming its key
  partner in China
One bed, two dreams Fonterra in China - Rod Oram's lecture to the University of Auckland's
Fonterra’s
high hopes
for Sanlu

https://chinaeconomic
 review.com/feeding-
         china/
One bed, two dreams Fonterra in China - Rod Oram's lecture to the University of Auckland's
2008:
Sanlu fails

• http://faifaisoldi
  ers.blogspot.c
  o.nz/2016/02/c
  ase-1-sanlus-
  melamine-
  tainted-
  milk.html
https://en.wikipe
dia.org/wiki/200
8_Chinese_milk
    _scandal
   Wikipedia
   timeline:
https://en.wikipe
dia.org/wiki/Tim
eline_of_the_20
08_Chinese_mil
   k_scandal
Sanlu fails: Fonterra loses its $200m investment
Lessons Fonterra could have learnt from Sanlu
• Sanlu’s ownership structure was highly complex and conflicted

• Sanlu’s management structure was opaque

• Sanlu was dependent on myriad small suppliers of milk

• Sanlu’s operating systems and culture were highly deficient

• Fonterra had three appointees to Sanlu’s board
    • Patrick Kwok, Bob Major and Mark Wilson…but only Kwok spoke Mandarin

• Fonterra had extremely limited knowledge of Sanlu’s operations
    • It only seconded one or two technicians at a time to Sanlu; none spoke Mandarin

• Fonterra exerted very limited, if any, influence on Sanlu

• Fonterra was totally blind-sided. Chairman Henry van der Hayden and CEO Andrew
  Ferrier were clearly astounded by the revelations as the scandal unfolded
• https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/handle/10182/4200
Agenda

  • Fonterra’s (unsolved) strategic challenge

  • Sanlu

  • Beingmate Baby & Child Food

  • Capital & Governance
Post-Sanlu…pre-Beingmate
• September 2012 - DCD:
    • Fonterra found traces of dicyandiamide (DCD), an agricultural chemical, in its
      dairy products, unsettling consumers
         • …particularly in China, straining relations with its government

• August 2013 – Fines for pricing practices:
    • China’s anti-monopoly commission fines a number of multinationals US$100m
      for their pricing practices, including Fonterra ($900,000)

• August 2013 – botulism scare:
    • …on February 1, a torch was dropped into a piece of equipment at Fonterra’s
      Waitoa plant in the Waikato, triggering a series of events that:
    • Created a botulism false alarm in reprocessed whey protein concentrate
    • Caused panic among some consumers
          • …particularly in China, further straining relations with its government
    • Revealed how chaotic were Fonterra’s product tracing and recall systems
          • …and the food industry’s – NZ government inquiry initiated major overhaul
    • Killed Fonterra’s relationship with Danone, its major infant formula customer
          • …Danone became a competitor, sued for $1bn, and was awarded $183m
Crisis…solution
• By 2014, Fonterra was in a deep crisis. It was still:
    • Battling the aftermath of the botulism crisis at home and abroad
    • Trying to rebuild its reputation in China, particularly with the government
    • Out of the game with its own brands of infant formula, particularly in China
    • Had lost Danone, one of its largest customers for making branded formula
         • …resulting in its Darnum, Victoria, plant being seriously underutilised

• Solution…Beingmate:
    • A Chinese customer for Fonterra’s ingredients for formulas
    • A manufacturer, brander and seller of formulas with a near 10% market share
         • …through a vast network of affiliated, small retailers
    • A leading domestic player…& government was forcing sector consolidation
    • Run by a high profile Chinese entrepreneur, Xie Hong (“Sam”)
Courting Beingmate
• In early 2014, Theo Spierings, Fonterra’s set out on a “global grovel trip”,
  recalls a senior colleague of his at the time

• “When Theo arrived, Sam spotted an opportunity.”
    • Chinese government was pushing through major reforms of the infant
      formula industry to improve its integrity, particularly among its domestic
      manufacturers and distributors, and build consumer confidence in them

• Xie saw the benefits of closer ties to Fonterra as a source of ingredients for its
  own formulas and of Fonterra’s own brands to sell in its network.

• “The Chinese drove a very hard bargain.”
    • They knew Fonterra had to find a major partner to make Darnum
      economically viable again; Fonterra was eager to overcome its market failure
      in China with its own infant formula brands; and Fonterra believed it had to
      show the Chinese government it was serious about investing locally despite
      all its setbacks.

• “Theo kept saying Beingmate was ‘a ticket to the game’ – investing in farms in
  China was not enough. One way or another, he was determined to do this deal.”
Spierings: Beingmate deal a “game-changer”
• Spierings said from the outset his close relationship with Xie Hong was essential to
  the Fonterra-Beingmate relationship
• But he signed the MOU in Beijing, August 27, 2014, with Wang Zhentai, chairman
Beingmate – key to Fonterra’s China strategy
• As recently as its FY17 results presentation in September 2017, Fonterra said:
What could possibly go wrong?
• In the late-1990s, McKinsey was the architect of the strategy that led to the creation
  of Fonterra. It remains to this day one of the co-op’s key strategic advisers

• As Fonterra was consummating its deal with Beingmate, this was the advice
  McKinsey’s Shanghai office was giving for free public dissemination to foreign
  companies investing in China

                                       https://www.mckinsey.com/business-
                                   functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-
                                insights/a-pocket-guide-to-doing-business-in-china
…and offered free too by Univ. of Auckland
McKinsey’s 2014 advice…on e-commerce
• “China is home to some of the world’s largest, most successful, and innovative
  Internet-based companies.”

• “The pace at which Chinese consumers are embracing the Internet is at the cusp of
  causing major disruptions to many sectors in China.”

• “Perhaps because consumers are still new to our traditional ways of shopping or
  banking (only having had modern shopping malls for a decade in many cities),
  consumers are very willing to switch to buying online.”

• “Almost no consumer-facing business in China can succeed without an online and
  offline strategy today. Mall owners are struggling to find a new economic model.”

• “Retailers are trying to bring order to their nationwide distribution chains to exert
  control over the price at which their products are sold online.”

• “The online share of retail in China, at 8 percent in 2014, is higher than it is in the
  United States and is not close to reaching saturation. Increasingly, this is conducted
  through mobile devices. The payments system is in place, logistics are improving,
  and online providers are trusted. Many retailers will adapt, often with far fewer
  physical locations.”
McKinsey’s 2014 advice…on joint-ventures
• “If regulations require you to have a joint-venture partner and a minority position
  today, assume it will be that way forever in the core business activities. From
  automotive to financial services, the lesson is that it won’t change. If that model is
  not attractive today, do not invest in the hope that it will change.”

• “Establish from the outset a clear hierarchy of who interacts with whom at the
  joint-venture partner and with relevant government officials. Chinese partners like
  the certainty this provides. Ensure that the committed executive shows up for
  board meetings and the like, and don’t delegate.”

• “Place a trusted senior colleague in China with a commitment to have him or her
  be there for the long term. He or she is your go-to person when things get volatile
  in China, someone whose viewpoint the global management team will trust, and
  someone the head of your joint-venture partner will also learn to trust.”

• “Usually, this person will be very strong in people development, with skills almost
  overlapping with a head of HR. And he or she will need to be 100 percent trusted
  to enforce compliance and to role model required behaviors. Typically, make this
  person chairman of your Asia or China operations, as senior a title as possible.”
McKinsey’s 2014 advice…on reputation
        “Don’t do anything to compromise
        your global brand and reputation.

   If you can’t do business the way you want to,
                then don’t do it at all.”
Fonterra acquires Beingmate stake
• August 27, 2014: Fonterra agrees to buy stake, up to 20% for $615m

• February 2, 2015: Fonterra launches its offer to buy Beingmate shares

• March 2, 2015: Beingmate reported its 2014 results:
   • Sales fell 17.24% to yuan 5.06bn (they had peaked at yuan 6.11bn in 2013)
   • Operating profits fell 89% to yuan 104.4m
   • Net profit attributable to shareholders fell 91% to yuan 65.7m (US$10.5m), from
     yuan 721m in the prior year.

• March 18, 2015: Fonterra buys 192.4m shares at yuan 18 each
   • 18.8% stake for $750m…smaller stake, more money than Fonterra expected
   • “Due consideration” had been given to Beingmate’s recent results,
     said Lukas Paravicini, Fonterra CFO, five days after the deal closed
   • The purchase was financed entirely by new debt
Beingmate plunges, two Chinese rivals soar
• t

   2011:
Beingmate
floated at
 yuan 42
per share
Heavy losses < . . . . > Dysfunctional board

                           Johannes Priem, Fonterra’s previous
                       head of Greater China, non-Mandarin speaker
                                    Christina Zhu, Fonterra’s current
                                 head of Greater China, Mandarin speaker
What went wrong?
• Constant turmoil out in the markets…and in management and the board
    • …beginning with Xie Hong, its founder, who had alienated institutional investors
      and quit the board soon after the company floated in 2011

• Beingmate disillusioned its franchisees by trying to extract greater returns from them
• Moreover, Beingmate’s network was heavily focused on third-tier cities

• …then Beingmate floundered as e-commerce rapidly took a large share of the market
  away from brick-and-mortar retailers and sharply drove down prices
Beingmate’s problems with e-commerce
• t
The cost to Fonterra’s farmer-shareholders
• Of Fonterra’s 7 strategic objectives for its Beingmate investment:
    • Sales of Fonterra’s Anmum brand of infant formula are minimal
    • Beingmate took 51% stake in Darnum, but is buying less than its share of output
    • The other 5 strategic objectives have yet to eventuate
    • Beingmate is heavily loss making, pays no dividend (Fonterra expected $16m pa)
    • Fonterra has very publicly ruptured its relationship with Beingmate by criticising its
      corporate governance

• The cost to Fonterra’s shareholders
    • Fonterra has written down its investment from $750m to $244m (-67%)
    • In total, so far…
          • $506m write down + ≈ $120m in debt costs + ≈ $28m in share of losses
            + $48m in lost dividends = $702m

• Is Fonterra’s current $244m value of its Beingmate stake realistic?
• Beingmate’s recovery looks immensely difficult…Fonterra’s reported no progress yet
• …if ultimately the value is zero…

• …Fonterra’s shareholders will have lost more than $1bn on Beingmate
What went on in the Fonterra-Beingmate relationship?
 • This Harvard Business School case study on Beingmate is highly revealing

                                                                   http://www.hbs.
                                                                     edu/faculty/
                                                                   Pages/item.asp
                                                                    x?num=52057
Xie goes to Harvard
• Xie, Beingmate’s founder,
  has given at least two talks at
  Harvard Business School on the
  case study – in 2016 and 2017

• This page is a machine translation
  from a Chinese parenting website
  reporting on his 2017 visit

• There is no mention of Fonterra in
  this report, or a long press release
  from Beingmate about Xie’s
  comments at Harvard
Life inside Beingmate, as reported by HBS
• The opportunity of sourcing ingredients from Fonterra:
    • …reputation of foreign producers, diversifying from Chinese sources

• But the disadvantages…

• “In the international dairy supply, we have to follow a 24-month rolling plan to
  cater to the market,” he said. “However, in China, we can adjust product types
  whenever we want, which is totally impossible to achieve in the global market.
  For example, we can produce one type of product for this month, with high
  efficiency and low cost.

 “Then for next month, we can produce something different by switching
 equipment. The benefit of this mode is that we are able to produce products that
 are fresher, and we are more flexible in satisfying customer needs and following
 market trends. But [with global sourcing] we have to learn how to operate in the
 mode of few varieties and large batches.”
    •   Bolin Qian, Beingmate’s associate general manager of global strategy (at the time)
Conflict with Fonterra
• Conflict within Beingmate over relationship with Fonterra:
    • The case writers said some in the company “questioned the wisdom of
      allowing a joint brand [Fonterra’s Anmum] — one not branded as part of the
      Beingmate portfolio — to exploit Beingmate’s extensive distribution network.”

• They quoted one executive:
    • “You don’t want to raise other people’s babies.”

• Beingmate’s infant formula market share:
    • Plunged from 9.3% in 2013 to 2.5% in 2017, according to Euromonitor

• Meanwhile, Fonterra’s global arch-rivals have greatly grown their shares:
   • Nestlé to 17% from 12%
   • Danone to 10.6% from 7%
   • FrieslandCampina to 7.4% from 4.1%
What went wrong
• Fonterra felt under great pressure to make a big strategic investment in China to
  rectify its own failures in the market, and to assuage what it believed were the
  desires of the Chinese government

• Beingmate took advantage of Fonterra’s weak bargaining position
  to drive a hard bargain

• Was Fonterra’s due diligence report on Beingmate, provided by one of its
  external advisers overseas, essentially a straight line extrapolation of
  Beingmate’s past growth? Or did it flag up the weaknesses of the company?

• Beingmate has utterly failed to deliver on the prospects promised, through a
  combination of its own internal failures and of turbulent market conditions

• Fonterra has doggedly stuck with Beingmate, arguing it is an integral part of its
  China strategy and it will eventually come right

• “Beingmate was outside our capability; we’ve denied for three years that there
  was an issue; the only issues were external and short-term ones rather than
  anything to do with Beingmate”
    • A former Fonterra senior executive who was there when the deal was done
What has Fonterra learnt?
• Any parallels between Sanlu and Beingmate?
    • None. Sanlu was about melamine
        • John Wilson, Fonterra chairman,
           FY18 interim results presentation, March 21, 2018

• Has Fonterra learnt any lessons from Beingmate?
    • “Yes, we have. China evolves very quickly. To have an 18.8% stake in a
      Chinese company with regulations increasing very quickly is not the easiest
      to say it mildly.”
         • Theo Spierings, Fonterra CEO,
           FY18 interim results presentation, March 21, 2018

• Is Beingmate still integral to Fonterra's China strategy?
     • “You can’t unpick it.”
         • Theo Spierings, Fonterra CEO,
            FY18 interim results presentation, March 21, 2018
…now Fonterra downplays Beingmate
• …saying Beingmate is tiny in its global strategy and small in its China strategy
• Moreover, the Enterprise Value of Greater China (China + Taiwan + HK) rose by
  $1bn 2015-17
    • But enterprise value includes debt…
        • …and Fonterra added $750m of debt to its China operations to fund its
           Beingmate stake plus additional debt to develop its China Farms
China Farms
• Years of heavy investment by Fonterra in its three farming hubs in China
• But barely profitable…and only because it sells its milk at a premium to
  Fonterra’s downstream operations
• …and it talks up its toe-hold in the fresh milk market
Fonterra’s growth in China
• …has come from ingredients, and consumer and food service
    • …which require minimal capex in China
• …while the heavy capex businesses, Beingmate and Chain Farms
  have racked up large cumulative losses and debt
…but wait, it says Beingmate is still important
Agenda

  • Fonterra’s (unsolved) strategic challenge

  • Sanlu
  • Beingmate Baby & Child Food

  • Capital & Governance
Capital and Governance
• Fonterra raised some $4.5bn of capital from farmers in the five years up to 2012
    • …the year the co-op changed its capital structure

• Fonterra has invested
…overheard in the gents
Farmer A: "See the share price today? Down again.”

Farmer B: "The Chinese saw us coming”

Farmer A: "Nobody put their hand up."

Farmer B: "To err is human, they say."

Farmer A: "To lose millions is bloody incompetence.”

  Two farmer-shareholders, in the gents at Claudelands Events Centre, Hamilton
    Fonterra Shareholders’ Meeting, a briefing after the FY18 interim results
                                 March 26, 2018
You can also read