Of Discharge Summaries - National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation September 2017
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries September 2017
Published by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care Level 5, 255 Elizabeth Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Phone: (02) 9126 3600 Fax: (02) 9126 3613 Email: accreditation@safetyandquality.gov.au Website: www.safetyandquality.gov.au ISBN: 978-1-925665-15-4 © Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care 2017 All material and work produced by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care is protected by copyright. The Commission reserves the right to set out the terms and conditions for the use of such material. As far as practicable, material for which the copyright is owned by a third party will be clearly labelled. The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that this material has been reproduced in this publication with the full consent of the copyright owners. With the exception of any material protected by a trademark, any content provided by third parties, and where otherwise noted, all material presented in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence. Enquiries regarding the licence and any use of this publication are welcome and can be sent to communications@safetyandquality.gov.au. The Commission’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following citation: The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National guidelines for on-screen presentation of discharge summaries. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2017. Disclaimer The content of this document is published in good faith by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (the Commission) for information purposes. The document is not intended to provide guidance on particular healthcare choices. You should contact your health care provider on particular healthcare choices. The Commission does not accept any legal liability for any injury, loss or damage incurred by the use of, or reliance on, this document.
Contents Contents1 4. Cardinality of data fields 41 1. Introduction2 5. Recommended formatting and functionality 45 1.1 Objective and purpose 2 5.1 Font 45 1.2 Development of the guidelines 3 5.2 Tables 45 1.3 Key findings from consultation 3 5.3 Document heading, start and end of 1.4 Implementing the guidelines 4 document, and administrative details 45 2. General presentation guidelines 5 5.4 Formatting and functionality 2.1 Abbreviations 5 for each component 45 2.2 Dates 5 Appendix A: Sample discharge summary 49 2.3 Times 5 References53 2.4 Names 5 Acronyms and abbreviations 54 2.5 Addresses 5 2.6 Telephone numbers 6 2.7 Email address 6 3. Specific components 7 A Patient details 9 B Hospital details 11 C Recipients 13 D Author 14 E Presentation details 15 F Problems and diagnoses 18 G Procedures 20 H Clinical summary 21 I Allergies/adverse reactions 23 J Medicines on discharge 24 K Ceased medicines 27 L Alerts 29 M Recommendations 30 N Follow-up appointments 32 O Information provided to the patient 34 P Recipients details 36 Q Selected investigation results 38 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 1
1. Introduction The clinical handover of a patient on • The breadth of information presented in discharge from hospital generally occurs the GP software view is not consistent with using an electronic discharge summary the information presented in the hospital (eDS). A discharge summary is a collection discharge summaries of information about events during care of • The format of medications information a patient by a provider or organisation. The across hospital discharge summary document is produced during a patient’s templates and the GP view of the My Health stay in hospital as either an admitted or Record discharge summary varies. non‑admitted patient, and issued when or after the patient leaves the care of the The fourth clinical safety review recommended hospital. Clinical handover is a known area that the Commission work with relevant of risk for patient harm, particularly in the agencies, jurisdictions and peak clinical bodies transition from acute care to the community to develop a common presentation format for setting. Discharge summaries are critical discharge summaries. This would be submitted for ensuring well‑coordinated and effective to the Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory clinical handover because they are the primary Council for endorsement for eventual use communication mechanism between hospitals of the format in clinical systems across the and primary healthcare providers. country. In July 2012, the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care 1.1 Objective and purpose (the Commission) was appointed by These guidelines aim to improve the on‑screen the System Operator to develop and presentation of discharge summaries and manage a clinical safety program for the thereby improve the overall safety and quality My Health Record system, which is a secure of patients’ continuity of care. The guidelines online summary of health information, provide recommendations to ensure that personally controlled by individuals. the necessary information about a patient’s Patients’ discharge summaries can be hospital encounter, and immediate next added to their My Health Record. steps and follow-up, are provided in a clear and unambiguous manner. This helps eDS As part of the Commission’s clinical safety recipients (for example, primary healthcare program, eight clinical safety reviews of the providers) identify any risk areas, as well as the My Health Record system were completed. most important discussion topics for patient The fourth clinical safety review, conducted in consultation. 2014, included an end-to-end investigation of the accuracy and data quality of eDS. Although In 2015–16 the National E-Health Transition the review verified that the information Authority activities transitioned across to a presented in discharge summaries in My Health new entity called the Australian Digital Health Record was transmitted accurately from the Agency (the Agency). For the purpose of source hospital, other findings from the review these guidelines all reference will be made included the following: to the NEHTA core information components1 • Information in the discharge summary varies and clinical document architecture (CDA) between settings and is not displayed in a specification for discharge summaries2 as they consistent order are known and referenced as. The guidelines are based on NEHTA eDS core information • Terminology between the hospital discharge components.1 Other national or international summaries and the general practitioner standards are also referenced, where relevant. (GP) software view is inconsistent in some The guidelines provide recommendations on: instances 2 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
1. Introduction • The position for each component or element • Identifying other barriers that may affect within the discharge summary uptake of the proposed guidelines and • Labelling for section headings and table proposing strategies to address these headings barriers. • Content to be displayed Further information about the assessment, • Presentation format (tables, bullet points consultation, prototype testing and human and so on) factors analysis are presented in the National • Functionality requirements. Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – work report. This document is intended for vendors and implementers of clinical information systems These guidelines aim to drive standardisation that generate or present eDS, and for local in the way discharge summaries are teams setting up eDS templates. presented, while ensuring that NEHTA eDS core information components1 are captured 1.2 Development of the and displayed. It is acknowledged, however, guidelines that certain hospitals and clinical specialties require additional information to be included The development of these guidelines has been in a discharge summary. Therefore, it is supported by the Australian Government recommended that the principles in the Department of Health. They were first guidelines are applied in these discharge published in August 2016 and were revised summaries and any additional information can based on feedback received since that first be incorporated to complement the guidelines. publication. They were presented to states and territories in October 2017. The guidelines were 1.3 Key findings from developed by: consultation • Conducting a literature review and environmental scan on standards, Electronic discharge summaries were reviewed specifications and studies relating by three major target audiences, each with a to the on‑screen presentation of different focus (Table 1.1). discharge summaries Table 1.1 Discharge summary audiences and • Reviewing the NEHTA style guide and clinical document architecture (CDA) focus areas specification for discharge summaries2 Audience Focus area • Reviewing current presentation of discharge summaries in clinical information systems, Healthcare providers • Patient journey GP software and My Health Record, in hospitals authoring within the hospital including both admitted and non‑admitted discharge summaries patients Pharmacists, general • Information relating • Consulting extensively with healthcare practitioners and to the patient’s providers across Australia, and convening other healthcare continuity of care an expert group to review the findings and professionals in • Follow-up activities draft guidelines primary healthcare • Areas of risk that • Conducting human factors analysis of settings receiving require immediate interactions and workflow on eDS using discharge summaries attention eye‑tracking workshops on the draft prototype Patients and carers • Follow-up and prevention activities National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 3
1. Introduction A consistent pattern identified during CDA header information and section titles in stakeholder consultation was that the preferred the recommended format. presentation of the eDS depended on the audience. Authors of discharge summaries (hospital healthcare providers) preferred a layout that mimics the patient journey while in hospital, with recommendations and follow- up actions being displayed after the hospital treatment. Primary healthcare providers highlighted that information about immediate actions for ongoing patient management and follow-up is most important, and should be presented as one of the initial sections of a discharge summary. Data from eye-tracking sessions revealed that, in practice, recommendations and follow‑up steps are viewed less than information about hospital treatment. This was validated at the discussion workshops, where feedback indicated that by presenting a high-level summary of what led the patient to present at the hospital and the conditions treated, followed by a succinct clinical summary, healthcare providers were able to quickly understand the next steps with minimal effort. With this in mind, the guidelines are recommended for both the acute (authors) and primary healthcare (recipients) settings of discharge summaries. 1.4 Implementing the guidelines To implement the guidelines, it is recommended that the eDS style sheet and authoring and rendering specification 1,2,3 be revised to include software requirements for: • Discharge summary authoring systems that include –– how to format information in the body of the CDA document, such as creating the problems and diagnoses tables –– a type of identifier in the CDA document that is not displayed, but which tells a rendering system that the authoring system adopted the requirements in the eDS specification • Discharge summary rendering systems that include requirements for presenting the 4 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
2. General presentation guidelines This section describes recommendations that spacing separating the hours and minutes are applicable across several components (for example, ‘14:00−1000’ or ‘07:00+1200’) throughout the discharge summary, including • Display date and time, when used together, the use of abbreviations, dates, times, with the date first, followed by the time names, addresses, telephone numbers and and time zone (for example, ‘04 Jan 2016 email addresses. 13:30+1000’ or ‘15-May-2017 22:10−0600’) • Do not abbreviate time periods (for 2.1 Abbreviations example, 4/52 should be written as ‘4 weeks’). Avoid abbreviations in a clinical context because they can be misleading and therefore increase clinical safety risk. 2.4 Names The following recommendations align with 2.2 Dates NEHTA specifications and guidelines1,2 : The following recommendations align with • Present names as a single text name NEHTA specifications and guidelines2 : (unstructured) or as a structured name with family name, given name, and prefixes and • Display date values that include a month, suffixes day and year as a one- or two-digit day (for example, ‘1’, ‘07’, ‘14’), a three-character • Display names in the following order: month (for example, Jan, May; with the first title(s) and prefix(es), first name, LAST letter in upper case), and a four-digit year NAME, name suffix(es) (for example, (for example, ‘2016’) ‘Dr Fred SIMPSON Jr’) • Separate day, month and year using a • Display the patient and/or healthcare hyphen or a single space, but not both (for provider’s family name in uppercase letters example, ‘14-Jun-2015’ or ‘8 Jan 2016’). next to their first name (for example, ‘Mr John CITIZEN’) 2.3 Times • Display first names with the first letter in uppercase followed by lower case letters The following recommendations align with (for example, ‘John’) NEHTA specifications and guidelines2 : • Present unstructured names as text • Present times as hours, minutes and • Display structured names with the prefix seconds (where relevant) in the format and suffix as uppercase for the first letter HH:MM:SS, using a 24-hour clock (for followed by lower case letters example, ‘19:00’ for 7:00pm, ‘00:00’ for • Include the healthcare provider’s title when 12:00 am). Either one or two digits can be presenting their name (that is, Dr, Professor, used for times before 10am (for example, as appropriate). ‘9:00’ or ‘09:00’) • Separate hours, minutes and seconds using 2.5 Addresses colons (‘:’) The following recommendations align with • Present time zones using ‘+’ or ‘–’ after the NEHTA specifications and guidelines1,2 : time, followed by the numbers of hours ahead or behind Coordinated Universal • Display residential or work addresses Time (UTC) in the order of house/building number, street name, suburb, state, postcode and • Display hours ahead or behind UTC as country, with a single space or comma four‑digit values with no characters or (‘,’) between each section (for example, National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 5
2. General presentation guidelines ‘276 Flinders Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia’). The following recommendation follows the guidelines from the UK’s Health and Social Care Information Centre4: • If an address is to be displayed across multiple lines (for example, wrapped in a table cell), break down the components as indicated in Table 2.1. Table 2.1 Components of an address in a table Component Example House/building number 276 Street name Flinders Street Suburb Melbourne State and postcode Victoria, 3000 Country Australia 2.6 Telephone numbers The following recommendation aligns with NEHTA specifications and guidelines2 : • Format national and international telephone numbers according to the ITU-T E.123 standard [ITU-T2001] (for example, ‘(03) 9699 3466’ and ‘+61 3 9699 3466’). 2.7 Email address The following recommendation aligns with NEHTA specifications and guidelines2 : • Display email addresses in the SMTP format, and include the label ‘e-mail’ or ‘email’ (for example, ‘email: john@citizen.com’). 6 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
3. Specific components Figure 3.1 shows the recommended order of information components in an electronic discharge summary. The identifying letters for each information component correspond to subsequent sections of the guidelines. A sample discharge summary populated with full clinical information is shown in Appendix A. Figure 3.1 Information components and layout of an electronic discharge summary Discharge Summary Patient details Hospital details A B START OF DOCUMENT Recipients: C Author: D Presentation details E Presentation date Discharge date Length of stay Episode type Clinical unit Senior clinician Discharge destination Problems and diagnoses F Principal diagnosis Reason for presentation Secondary diagnoses Complications Past medical history Procedures • G Clinical summary H Allergies/Adverse reactions I Substance/Agent Reaction type Clinical manifestation Medicines on discharge J Duration/ Change reason/ Quantity Medicine Directions Status End date Clinical indication supplied Ceased medicines K Medicine Reason for ceasing Alerts L • National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 7
3. Specific components Discharge Summary Patient details Hospital details Recommendations M Recommendation Person responsible Follow-up appointments N Description When Booking status Name Location Contact details Information provided to the patient O • Recipients P Name Contact details Address Organisation Department Selected investigation results Q Test name Date Result Administrative details Document type: Create date/time: Date/Time attested: END OF DOCUMENT 8 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
3. Specific components A Patient details This section outlines the guidelines for presenting patient details within a discharge summary (labelled A in Figure 3.1). Figure 3.2 Example discharge summary section: patient details Discharge Summary Patient details Hospital details Bernice VANK Roxboro Hospital, Eastern Health District Date of birth: 01 Jan 1951 (65y) Female Miltown, Victoria, 3110, Australia 276 Flinders Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia Phone: (03) 9699 3466 (workplace), (03) 9895 3461 (fax) Phone: (03) 9288 3467 (home) MRN: 913474 IHI: 1234 7683 9873 2984 Presentation guidelines Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Position • Display the patient details on the • Patient identification details should be upper left corner of the discharge displayed in a consistent manner so users summary, within the banner section can efficiently and accurately identify the patient • The upper left corner of a screen or document is usually where the most critical information is displayed in western countries, where text is read from left to right • Presenting patient details on the upper left corner of the screen also aligns with the recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology5 • Eye-tracking sessions revealed that the upper left corner of the summary received a significant number of fixations. Refer to the Commission’s on-screen presentation of the eDS work report for additional information 6 Heading • Use the heading ‘Patient details’ • The heading ‘Patient demographics’ was tested; however, feedback indicated that the word ‘demographics’ was misleading National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 9
3. Specific components Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Format • Display the patient’s name on a • A consistent order of information is likely single line, in a larger, bold font to facilitate a faster review of the discharge • Display the patient’s details in the summary following order, with no preceding • Presenting the patient’s name in bold and label (except for date of birth) using a larger font aims to minimise clinical –– date of birth safety risk of referring to an incorrect patient, especially when multiple screens –– sex are open at the same time –– address • The IHI is displayed to assist with the –– telephone patient’s identification when accessing My –– Medical Record Number (MRN) Health Record –– Individual Healthcare Identifier • Displaying patient details consistently can (IHI) help minimise clinical safety risks, especially • Ensure the patient’s details are when more than one document is open always visible, regardless of at the same time. This aligns with the whether the user scrolls up or recommendations provided by the National down Institute of Standards and Technology5 Content • Patient name • Recommendations for content are based on • Deceased statement (if applicable) NEHTA eDS core information components1,2 • Date of birth • Age in years • Sex • Residential address • Telephone (work and home, if available) • Patient identification number(s) (e.g. IHI, MRN) Data fields Data field Recommendations Rationale/reference to standards Patient name • Refer to the general presentation • Refer to the general presentation guidelines guidelines for names in Section 2 in Section 2 Deceased • If a patient is deceased, display • Healthcare providers should be able to statement ‘DECEASED’ next to the patient’s immediately identify whether the patient name in bold, upper case letters for whom a discharge summary has been written is deceased 10 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
3. Specific components Data field Recommendations Rationale/reference to standards Date of birth • Refer to the general presentation • Refer to the general presentation guidelines guidelines for dates in Section 2 in Section 2 • Display the age of the patient in round brackets next to the date of birth Sex • Display the patient’s sex in full, with • NEHTA CDA rendering no abbreviations specification document 2 • Display the patient’s sex with the • NEHTA eDS core information components1 first character in upper case, the remainder in lower case Address • Refer to the general presentation • Refer to the general presentation guidelines guidelines for addresses in in Section 2 Section 2 Telephone • Refer to the general presentation • Refer to the general presentation guidelines guidelines for telephone numbers in Section 2 in Section 2 Patient • Display the IHI number in groups • NEHTA CDA rendering identification of four digits with a single space specification standards2 number(s) between each group (e.g. 1234 5678 9076 7382) • Display the patient’s MRN with no spaces between digits (e.g. 12345) B Hospital details This section outlines the guidelines for presenting hospital details within a discharge summary (labelled B in Figure 3.1). Figure 3.3 Example discharge summary section: hospital details Discharge Summary Patient details Hospital details Bernice VANK Roxboro Hospital, Eastern Health District Date of birth: 01 Jan 1951 (65y) Female Miltown, Victoria, 3110, Australia 276 Flinders Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia Phone: (03) 9699 3466 (workplace), (03) 9895 3461 (fax) Phone: (03) 9288 3467 (home) MRN: 913474 IHI: 1234 7683 9873 2984 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 11
3. Specific components Presentation guidelines Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Position • Display the hospital details in the • Stakeholder consultation revealed that upper right corner of the discharge details of the treating hospital are critical summary, within the banner pieces of information. They allow the section, next to the patient details healthcare provider to seek additional information on the patient’s episode of care, if required Heading • Use the heading ‘Hospital details’ • ‘Hospital details’ is intuitive and patient- friendly, and matches ‘Patient details’ Format • Display the hospital name on a • Hospital details should be displayed in single line, in bold, with a larger the order in which they are reviewed by font healthcare providers • Display the hospital details in • Hospital phone numbers are included in the following order, with no case the primary healthcare provider needs preceding labels to contact the author or senior clinician for –– Local Health District, if clarification. Displaying hospital information applicable in a static position allows this information to be readily available regardless of the –– address section of the discharge summary that is –– telephone being reviewed • Ensure that the hospital details are always visible, regardless of whether the user scrolls up or down Content • Hospital name and Local Health • Content recommendation is based on District (if applicable) NEHTA eDS core information components1 • Address • Contact details Data fields Data field Recommendations Rationale/reference to standards Hospital • Display the hospital name with the first letter • Ensures consistency throughout the name in upper case followed by lower case letters document Address • Refer to the general presentation guidelines • Refer to the general presentation for addresses in Section 2 guidelines in Section 2 Telephone • Refer to the general presentation guidelines • Refer to the general presentation for telephone numbers in Section 2 guidelines in Section 2 12 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
3. Specific components C Recipients This section outlines the guidelines for presenting the name of all recipients of a discharge summary (labelled C in Figure 3.1). Figure 3.4 Example discharge summary section: recipients Recipients: Dr Andrew SMITH Joe DOE Presentation guidelines Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Position • Display the names of all • Stakeholder consultation revealed that it is the recipients under the important for healthcare providers to be able to document’s banner (and the quickly determine whether a discharge summary start of document indicator). has been primarily directed at them This is the first element of • The name of the nominated primary healthcare the document’s content provider should be displayed in this section, as the primary recipient of the discharge summary. Because the nominated primary healthcare provider is an optional component as per NEHTA specifications, there is a risk that this section may be left blank. Therefore, the name of all recipients (a mandatory component) is presented instead to ensure this section is never left blank • Many healthcare providers would like more specific information on who else has been sent a copy of the discharge summary, to help them understand the patient’s treatment plan more broadly Heading • Use the heading ‘Recipients’ • ‘Recipients’ is intuitive and patient‑friendly Format • Present the names of all • Displaying recipients’ names as a list facilitates recipients as a list, with each review name on a single line • Allowing users to navigate to the recipients • Ensure the names of all section when a recipient’s name is clicked enables recipients are clearly visible quick access to contact details without having to and separated from the rest manually scroll down of document’s content • Link the name of the recipient so that, when it is clicked, the user is directed to the recipients section, where contact information is displayed National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 13
3. Specific components Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Content • Include only the names of all • The top section of a discharge summary should recipients of the discharge display the most critical information. Presenting summary any other information in addition to recipients’ names would result in critical information being displayed further down the document Data fields Data field Recommendations Rationale/reference to standards Recipient’s name • Refer to the general presentation • Refer to the general presentation guidelines guidelines for names in Section 2 in Section 2 D Author This section outlines the guidelines for presenting the document’s author within a discharge summary (labelled D in Figure 3.1). Figure 3.5 Example discharge summary section: author Author: Dr Jane MCDONALD, (03) 9699 3498, (Medical Officer) Presentation guidelines Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Position • Display the name of the • Stakeholder consultation highlighted that primary document’s author next healthcare providers would like the author’s name to the recipients’ names, displayed close to the hospital details. This allows underneath the start of healthcare providers to readily determine who they document indicator need to contact and how they can be contacted if further clarifications are required Heading • Use the heading ‘Author’ • The heading ‘Author’ is self-explanatory Format • Clearly separate the name • Clearly separating the author’s name from clinical of the author from the rest information will help healthcare providers identify of the document the author of the discharge summary and know who to contact if they have any concerns regarding the patient’s follow-up care 14 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
3. Specific components Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Content • Include the name of • The absence of the author’s name can cause the document’s author, primary healthcare providers to spend a significant communication details amount of time trying to identify them (if different from hospital • During stakeholder consultation, various healthcare communication details), providers requested that the author’s role be and the author’s role/ job displayed in a discharge summary, although this is title in brackets next to the not a specific data field within the NEHTA eDS core author’s name (e.g. Junior information components1 Doctor) Data fields Data field Recommendations Rationale/reference to standards Author’s name • Refer to the general presentation guidelines • Refer to the general presentation and role for names in Section 2 guidelines in Section 2 • Although the author’s role is not currently part of eDS core information components, it is recommended that it be included in brackets as part of the name Contact • If contact details are available, display them • Refer to the general presentation details next to the author’s name guidelines in Section 2 E Presentation details This section outlines the guidelines for displaying presentation details within a discharge summary (labelled E in Figure 3.1). Figure 3.6 Example discharge summary section: presentation details Presentation details Presentation date Discharge date Length of stay Episode type Clinical unit Senior clinician Discharge destination General Surgical Dr Frank LIN 05 Mar 2016 09:00 08 Mar 2016 10:00 3 days Home surgery unit (Consultant) National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 15
3. Specific components Presentation guidelines Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Position • Display the presentation details across • The length of hospital stay can the screen, underneath ‘Recipients’ and indicate acuity, making presentation ‘Author’ details one of the most critical components of a discharge summary. It should be one of the first elements displayed Headings • Use the heading ‘Presentation details’ for • The headings ‘Admission details’ and the section ‘Admission date’ were considered; • Use the following headings for the however, these are not applicable for table columns non-admitted patients –– ‘Presentation date’ • ‘Encounter details’ and ‘Encounter date’ were also trialled; however, –– ‘Discharge date’ stakeholder consultation revealed they –– ‘Length of stay’ (at hospital) were misleading and less intuitive than –– ‘Clinical unit’ (the location from which ‘Presentation details’ the patient was discharged) –– ‘Episode type’ (the specialty in which the patient was treated) –– ‘Senior clinician’ (the healthcare provider who was responsible for the patient’s care at the time of discharge) –– ‘Discharge destination’ Format • Display the presentation details in a table • A table highlighting presentation date • Display the presentation date and and discharge date helps healthcare discharge date (both table headings and providers to efficiently identify this content) in bold and in a slightly larger information font than standard text Content • Content should be provided under each • As per stakeholder consultation, these of the headings outlined above data fields provide primary healthcare providers with a succinct summary of the presentation at hospital 16 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
3. Specific components Data fields Data field Recommendations Rationale/reference to standards Presentation • Refer to the general presentation • Refer to the general presentation date and guidelines for dates in Section 2 guidelines in Section 2 discharge date • For admitted patients, ‘Presentation date’ is the date of admission • For non-admitted patients, ‘Presentation date’ is the day the patient visited the hospital Length of stay • Present length of stay (the number of • As per stakeholder consultation, days the patient stayed at the hospital) as the length of stay at hospital can be the difference between the presentation an indicator of the level of acuity, date and discharge date and is therefore considered critical • Although this is currently not part information for primary healthcare of NEHTA eDS core information providers components1 , it is recommended that this calculation is performed Clinical unit • For admitted patients, the clinical unit • Recommendations align with NEHTA is the ward from which the patient was eDS core information components1 discharged • For non-admitted patients, the clinical unit is the emergency department or outpatient department • Avoid abbreviations Episode type • Display the name of the specialty or • Recommendations align with NEHTA specialties under which the patient was eDS core information components1 treated • If the patient was treated under more than one specialty, display these in reverse chronological order • Ensure the names of the specialties align with specialty codes provided by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Senior clinician • Name the clinician who was responsible • Recommendations align with NEHTA for the care given to the patient at the eDS core information components1 time of discharge • Refer to the general presentation guidelines for names in Section 2 Discharge • Indicate the location to which the patient • Recommendations align with NEHTA destination was discharged (e.g. home, aged care eDS core information components1 facility) • If the patient is deceased, include ‘DECEASED’ bold capital letters National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 17
3. Specific components F Problems and diagnoses This section outlines the guidelines for displaying problems and diagnoses within a discharge summary (labelled F in Figure 3.1). Figure 3.7 Example discharge summary section: problems and diagnoses Problems and diagnoses Principal diagnosis Acute appendicitis with peritonitis Reason for presentation Abdominal pain following recent travel to South East Asia Digoxin toxicity Secondary diagnoses Hyperkalaemia CCF – Congestive cardiac failure Complications Nil Obesity Past medical history Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Presentation guidelines Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Position • Display problems and diagnoses • Problems and diagnoses is one of the immediately after presentation most critical components of a discharge details summary. It provides primary healthcare providers with a succinct and easy-to‑read overview of the conditions treated at hospital, as well as the reason for admission • By displaying presentation details, and problems and diagnoses one after another, healthcare providers can have a clear and succinct summary of the episode of care in hospital Headings • Use the heading ‘Problems and • The section heading ‘Problems and diagnoses’ for this section diagnoses’ is intuitive and is written in plural • Use the following headings for the to take into account situations where more table rows than one problem or diagnosis is listed –– ‘Principal diagnosis’ • The headings selected for the various types of problems and diagnoses follow the –– ‘Reason for presentation’ recommendations of healthcare providers –– ‘Secondary diagnoses’ during stakeholder consultation –– ‘Complications’ –– ‘Past medical history’ 18 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
3. Specific components Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Format • Display problems and diagnoses in • Presenting this information in a table a two-column table, with the type facilitates readability of problem or diagnosis on the left • Highlighting the types of problems and and the list of conditions on the diagnoses helps to indicate the critical right nature of this information, and draws the healthcare provider’s attention to that section of the document Content • List all the following types of • Stakeholder consultation identified the need problems and diagnoses in the for healthcare providers to obtain a high- following order level understanding of the episode of care –– principal diagnosis in an efficient manner. These categories of problems and diagnoses address this need –– reason for presentation –– secondary diagnoses –– complications –– past medical history • If no information is available for one of the elements, enter ‘Nil’ Data fields Data field Recommendations Rationale/reference to standards Principal • Display the diagnosis that caused a visit to • Presenting problems and diagnoses diagnosis the hospital with this level of detail allows primary healthcare providers to Reason for • Display the patient’s symptoms that caused build a picture of the episode of presentation a visit to the hospital care, including all treated conditions and previous relevant conditions Secondary • Display the list of problems and diagnoses diagnoses (in addition to the principal diagnosis) that were treated at hospital Complications • Display any additional patient conditions or any adverse events that affected the hospital treatment Past medical • Display any previous patient conditions history that are relevant to the treatment provided at the hospital, and are important for the primary healthcare provider to be aware of National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 19
3. Specific components G Procedures This section outlines the guidelines for displaying procedures or interventions within a discharge summary (labelled G in Figure 3.1). Following NEHTA specifications and guidelines1,2 , this section should include clinical interventions including operations and procedures. Figure 3.8 Example discharge summary section: procedures Procedures • Laparoscopic appendicectomy Presentation guidelines Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Position • Display procedures immediately • Procedures can help healthcare providers after problems and diagnoses identify the main elements of the patient’s hospital treatment Heading • Use the heading ‘Procedures’ • The section heading ‘Procedures’ is intuitive and easily understood by healthcare providers Format • Display the list of procedures • In the NEHTA eDS core information and interventions performed components1 , ‘Procedures’ is an unstructured in hospital as a bullet list in element. Presenting information in a bullet chronological order list facilitates faster review of the discharge summary • Presenting procedures as a bullet list aligns with the heuristic principle that, when individuals are time-poor (which often is the case for primary healthcare providers), reading entire paragraphs and unstructured information is a difficult task; bullet points are recommended 7 Content • List the procedures and • Recommendations align with NEHTA eDS core interventions in chronological information components1 order • If no procedures were performed during the hospital stay, include the statement ‘Nil performed’ Data fields This component is unstructured, so no data fields are listed in this section. 20 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
3. Specific components H Clinical summary This section outlines the guidelines for displaying a clinical summary within a discharge summary (labelled H in Figure 3.1). This is expected to be one of the largest sections in a discharge summary. The unstructured nature of this component creates a challenge for readability. Figure 3.9 Example discharge summary section: clinical summary Clinical summary Returned on 1 Mar 16 from 3 week travel to Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia. 2/7 history of fever, tachycardia, myalgia, headache, photophobia, generalised abdo pain, constipation, nausea. Hep A and typhoid immunisations up to date; malarial prophylaxis for travel declined. Social history Widowed 2010 2 daughters Relocated from Queensland 6 months ago to live with 2nd daughter – assists with childcare Issues and progress 1. Appendicitis 5/10 dull generalised abdo pain worsened and localised to Right Iliac Fossa (RIF) Examination – rebound tenderness and guarding Review by surgical team in Short Stay Unit (SSU) – noted elevated White Cell Count (WCC) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), abdominal ultrasound scan result indicating appendicitis 3 port laparoscopic appendicectomy performed 5/3/16 (registrar Dr B Smith, surgeon Mr Teo Young – findings: purulent appendix with signs of peritonitis Transferred to surgical ward post-op Post-op course unremarkable 2. Digoxin toxicity Tachyarrhythmia noted on admission – note history of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Review by cardiologist Prof D Jones – diagnosed with digoxin toxicity – commenced on sotalol 80 mg bd 3. Hyperkalaemia Potassium ceased Blood pressure post-op consistently elevated Ramipril dose increased – for review with GP post-discharge 4. Congested Cardiac Failure (CCF) Managed with careful IV fluid therapy Frusemide recommenced day 1 post-op For review as outpatient with cardiologist National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 21
3. Specific components Presentation guidelines Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Position • Display the clinical summary • Eye-tracking sessions revealed that most after the list of procedures and time is spent on the first few sections of a interventions discharge summary. Attention is focused specifically on patient details, diagnoses and information about what happened to the patient in hospital Heading • Use the heading ‘Clinical summary’ • Other headings such as ‘Patient management’ were trialled during stakeholder consultation. ‘Clinical summary’ was preferred because it is currently used in a number of discharge summaries, making it more familiar Format • Use line breaks to separate topics • On average, healthcare providers have • Use bullet points or short approximately two minutes to review a sentences where appropriate, discharge summary. 8 Because this section is rather than full paragraphs one of the largest sections in the discharge summary, appropriate formatting should be • Use bold letters and coloured font used to facilitate readability to highlight critical information • Heuristic principles highlight that reading • Avoid abbreviations full paragraphs is a difficult task for people who are time-poor; bullet points are recommended 7 Content • Avoid repeating information • This section should give the healthcare that occurs in other sections of provider all the relevant information to the discharge summary, such as continue treating the patient outside the medicines and investigations hospital • Ensure this section is succinct but also provides all the relevant information • Describe abnormal investigation results in this section Data fields This component is unstructured, so no data fields are listed in this section. 22 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
3. Specific components I Allergies/adverse reactions This section outlines the guidelines for displaying allergies and adverse reactions within a discharge summary (labelled I in Figure 3.1). Figure 3.10 Example discharge summary section: allergies/adverse reactions Allergies/Adverse reactions Substance/Agent Reaction type Clinical manifestation ibuprofen Allergy Urticaria Presentation guidelines Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Position • Display allergies/adverse reactions • Allergies and adverse reactions are after the clinical summary presented before medicines on discharge • Ensure this section precedes the because of the relationship between these ‘Medicines on discharge’ section two sections Headings • Use the heading ‘Allergies/adverse • The heading ‘Allergies/adverse drug reactions’ for this section reactions’ was considered; however, • Use the following headings for the adverse reactions are not only caused by table columns drugs. ’Allergies/adverse reactions’ is more appropriate –– ‘Substance/agent’ • ‘Clinical manifestation’ aligns with NEHTA’s –– ‘Reaction type’ specifications and guidelines –– ‘Clinical manifestation’ Format • Display allergies/adverse reactions • Presenting this information in a table as a table facilitates readability • A tabular form also aligns with recommendations in the NEHTA implementation guidelines for clinical document presentation 3 Content • Name the substance/agent, • Recommendations align with NEHTA eDS causing the patient to experience core information components1 an adverse reaction • Describe the type of reaction (e.g. allergy) • Describe the negative effect (e.g. urticaria) National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 23
3. Specific components Data fields Data field Recommendations Rationale/reference to standards Substance/ • Describe the element that caused an • Abbreviations can cause confusion agent adverse reaction and increase clinical safety risks • Avoid abbreviations • Refer to the Commission’s National • Display medicines’ names as recommended Guidelines for On-Screen Display of in the Commission’s National Guidelines Clinical Medicines Information 9 for On-Screen Display of Clinical Medicines Information 9 Reaction type • Describe the reaction experienced by the • Aligns with NEHTA eDS core patient (e.g. allergy) information components1 Clinical • Describe the negative effect caused by the • Aligns with NEHTA eDS core manifestation substance/agent (e.g. urticaria) information components1 J Medicines on discharge This section outlines the guidelines for displaying medicines on discharge within a discharge summary (labelled J in Figure 3.1). Figure 3.11 Example discharge summary section: medicines on discharge Medicines on discharge Duration/ Change reason/ Quantity Medicine Directions Status End date Clinical indication supplied amoxycillin 875mg + clavulanic acid 125mg 1 tablet – twice a day – with or 10 day course New Appendicitis 10 tablets – Augmentin Duo Forte – after food tablet – oral metronidazole 400mg 1 tablet – three times a day – 10 day course New Appendicitis 10 tablets – Flagyl – tablet – oral swallow whole – with or after food paracetamol 500mg – 2 tablets – up to four times a day As required for – New – tablet – oral – maximum 8 tablets in 24 hours pain or fever sotalol 80mg – tablet 1 tablet twice a day – on an empty – New Atrial Fibrillation – – oral stomach 1 to 2 capsules – up to four tramadol 50mg – As required times a day – maximum 8 tablets – New – capsule – oral for pain in 24 hours ramipril 2.5mg – Dose increased, 1 capsule – twice a day – Changed – capsule – oral Hypertension 1 tablet – once a week on Sunday alendronate 70mg – – 30 minutes before food and – Unchanged – tablet – oral other medicines – remain upright for 30 minutes after taking aspirin 300mg – HALF a tablet – once a day in the – Unchanged – dispersible tablet – oral morning – with food frusemide 40mg – 1 tablet – once a day in the – Unchanged – tablet – oral morning calcium 600mg + 1 tablet twice a day – with or vitamin D 12.5MICROg – Unchanged – after food Ostelin – tablet – oral 24 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
3. Specific components Presentation guidelines Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Position Display medicines on discharge • Allergies/adverse reactions are presented immediately after allergies/adverse before medicines on discharge because of reactions the relationship between these two sections • Eye-tracking sessions confirmed that Display information relating to displaying the medicines before describing medicines after the clinical summary the treatment provided to the patient could negatively affect readability, causing healthcare providers to scroll up and down to understand why certain medicines were introduced, ceased or changed Headings • Use the heading ‘Medicines on • ‘Medicines’ aligns with the Commission’s discharge’ for this section National Guidelines for On-Screen Display of • Use the following subheadings for Clinical Medicines Information 9 the table columns • Some discharge summaries display –– ‘Medicine’ medicines on admission and medicines on discharge. Specifying ‘Medicines on –– ‘Directions’ discharge’ minimises ambiguity and clinical –– ‘Duration/End date’ safety risk –– ‘Status’ • Terminology for the table headings follows –– ‘Change reason/Clinical healthcare provider recommendations indication’ during stakeholder consultation –– ‘Quantity supplied’ Format • Display medicines on discharge in • Presenting this information in a table a table facilitates readability • Group medicines and display them • Grouping medicines by status allows in the following order healthcare providers to easily identify what –– new medicines medicines are new, changed and unchanged –– changed medicines • Combining the change reason and clinical indication in a single column saves space –– unchanged medicines without compromising the information. This • List medicines in each group aligns with feedback provided by healthcare alphabetically professionals National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017 25
3. Specific components Presentation element Recommendations Rationale Content • Name the medicine • This information gives primary healthcare • Give directions for taking State providers the information they need to fully the duration of the medicine (i.e. understand the medicines with which the short term or long term) or the patient was discharged anticipated end date • Classify the medicine’s status (i.e. ‘new’, ‘changed’ or ‘unchanged’) • State the change reason for those medicines that were changed in hospital, and clinical indications for those medicines introduced while in hospital • State the quantity of medicines provided to the patient before discharge Data fields If the patient for whom the discharge summary was written is deceased, do not list any medicines on discharge, but enter a dash (‘–’) in each cell of the table. Data field Recommendations Rationale/reference to standards Medicine • Display medicine names in alignment • Refer to the Commission’s National with the National Guidelines for On- Guidelines for On‑Screen Display of Screen Display of Clinical Medicines Clinical Medicines Information 9 Information 9 Directions • Display directions in alignment • Refer to the Commission’s National with the National Guidelines for Guidelines for On‑Screen Display of On‑Screen Display of Clinical Clinical Medicines Information 9 Medicines Information Duration/ End • If an end date is available, display • It is important for primary healthcare date this following the recommendations providers to understand the length of time for dates in Section 2 a medicine should be taken by the patient • If an end date is not available (e.g. a patient is discharged over the weekend and goes to the pharmacy on Monday), highlight whether the medicine is prescribed for short term or long term • If no information is available, add a dash (‘–’) to avoid the cell being left blank 26 National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries – September 2017
You can also read