NTG Morning Comments www.nesvick.com - Thursday, July 7, 2022 - Nesvick Trading Group
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Thursday, July 7, 2022 NTG Morning Comments www.nesvick.com Weather No big changes to the forecast this morning. The first map at the right shows Days 1-3 and the bulk of the rains in this map will fall during the next 48 hours. This will be the best shot of rainfall for the Corn Belt for the duration of the two week timeframe. The second map shows the Day 4-5 period. Some light rains will be possible here as a cold front moves through but probably not going to be a big rain- maker. Beyond that, there isn’t anything in the forecast models this morning showing another really good shot of moisture for the 15-day period. We should see mostly below normal precipitation for the Corn Belt during both the 6-10 and 11-15 day periods. Forecast models are still showing a shift where rainfall chances favor more southern portions of the country than the Corn Belt. That said, overnight models have turned a little drier in even the southern portions of the country. Temps will continue to be hot in the next few days. The majority of the Corn Belt could see temps return to near-normal levels by early next week. The Plains, however, could continue to see above normal temps, as shown in the map at the bottom right. Some models are hinting at a possible return of above normal temps in the Corn Belt by the 11-15 day period. Crops Today we’ll look at wheat production guesstimates. Let’s start by looking at winter wheat objective yield data. The two charts below are fairly similar. These look at July NASS reported heads/sf and the implied head weights vs. the condition index. The highlighted 2022 figures are using numbers from the June Crop Production report with current condition ratings. I find it interesting that the estimate on heads/sf would seem relatively inline with what you’d expect given the condition index. However, the implied head weight from June seems a bit optimistic relative to conditions. Obviously smaller head counts should lead to higher average weights, but the difference this year might be a bit stretched, no? All else equal, this would imply some potential downside to winter wheat production next week. Admittedly, I’m not sure how much faith to put into these scatters…they’re hardly slam dunks. Informa/IHS is actually calling for slightly higher winter wheat production. 1
Thursday, July 7, 2022 NTG Morning Comments www.nesvick.com July NASS Winter Wheat Objective Yield Data Heads/SF vs. Conditions Index 75 2010 2019 2016 2012 70 2020 2017 Early July Condition Index 2008 2021 65 2015 2018 60 2011 2013 2014 2022 55 50 R² = 0.1974 45 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 Heads per Square Foot July NASS Winter Wheat Objective Yield Data 80 Implied Head Weight vs. Condition Index 75 2016 2010 2019 2012 2020 70 2017 Early July Condition Index 2021 65 2015 2018 60 2011 2013 2014 2022 55 50 45 y = 72.876x + 17.391 R² = 0.3046 40 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 Implied Head Weight What to expect for spring wheat? We don’t have much to work with at this point in time…other than condition ratings. The chart below plots the July NASS spring wheat yield vs. the current condition index. This year’s condition index is represented by the red line. You can see that in the past few years (last year excluded) we’ve 2
Thursday, July 7, 2022 NTG Morning Comments www.nesvick.com seen the July yield come in higher than the trendline on the chart would imply. I would expect something similar to be seen this year. If we assume something around a 43.5 bpa yield on spring wheat, the June NASS harvested area estimate would imply something around a 465-470 mil bu spring wheat crop. This is a bit smaller than what Informa/IHS gave us yesterday. Other Spring Wheat July Yield Forecast vs. Condition Index 50 2018 2019 2015 2020 2016 2014 2010 45 2013 2005 2011 2017 2012 July NASS Yield 2007 40 2009 2004 2008 2003 2000 2001 35 2006 2002 2021 30 R² = 0.3249 25 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Week #26 Condition Index Livestock Late yesterday afternoon I heard some talk that 151 was traded in IA to a major. Not sure of what sort of volume we’re talking about. Would expect that NE would be somewhere close to that whenever they get around to trading. Obviously the south is still going to be a big discount. The weekly broiler hatchery update isn’t something I normally spend much time on, but with retail chicken prices still very high it is something we should casually monitor in the weeks and months ahead. Charts on eggs set and chick placements follow on the next page. We’ve seen eggs set totals score lots of new record highs this year, but chick placements have not been able to reach record levels until just recently. This continues to speak to the poor hatchability that seems to be a never-ending problem for the industry. You can also see we’re nearing our seasonal downturn in both categories. 3
Thursday, July 7, 2022 NTG Morning Comments www.nesvick.com Broiler Eggs Set in Incubators 245,000 240,000 235,000 230,000 225,000 220,000 215,000 210,000 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Chicks Placed for Meat Production 195,000 190,000 185,000 180,000 175,000 170,000 165,000 160,000 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Financials Looking at the last Dot Plot projection from the Fed is a good way of seeing how the market’s expectations have shifted in the past few weeks. The Dot Plot isn’t even a month old, but the market’s implied rate projections 4
Thursday, July 7, 2022 NTG Morning Comments www.nesvick.com have posted huge shifts. The Bloomberg version of the Dot Plot is below. The yellow dots are the various FOMC member projections and the orange line is the weighted average for each projection. The blue line shows what the Fed Funds futures were implying as of the release of these dots (6/15). For this year, Fed Funds were actually stronger than the average FOMC guesstimate. For 2023 and beyond, Fed Funds were not quite as aggressive as the FOMC, but they were still close. Fast forward to yesterday (when I pulled this chart) and the white line shows what Fed Funds are implying right now. Fed Funds are implying less hiking than the June FOMC for this year and is now pricing in rate cuts for 2023 and beyond. What a difference just a few weeks makes. We’ve gone from needing the Fed to hike aggressively to counter inflation to “OMG the economy is in shambles” in record speed. I’m of the opinion we’re overshooting the slowdown (for now). Thoughts appreciated. The big news overnight is that China’s Ministry of Finance is apparently considering a major stimulus package. As usual for China, the package would be aimed at infrastructure funding. It sounds like what the Chinese are doing are pulling forward regularly-scheduled debt sales for 2023 and allowing them to take place this year. The focus on infrastructure spending is of course mainly geared towards hitting the government’s GDP targets. Whether or not that is truly helpful for the Chinese economy is certainly open for debate. You can see this is having a big impact on certain commodities, such as copper and soybeans. Oil is higher, but honestly not as much as I might have expected. The other interesting news of the evening is that UK PM Boris Johnson has finally succumbed to pressure to resign. The BP is trading modestly higher at the time of writing this morning, though I’m not sure the PM’s resignation is the primary cause. Johnson apparently is hoping to remain in the spot until October while the party elects a new leader, but it seems unlikely that is going to happen. 5
Thursday, July 7, 2022 NTG Morning Comments www.nesvick.com Energy Not much new information to pass along this morning. As mentioned above, oil futures are bouncing a bit this morning – perhaps in response to the news on Chinese stimulus. I noted yesterday that calendar spreads were not confirming the move lower in oil, and in yesterday’s flat price weakness we continued to see calendar spreads trade firm. Additionally, as the chart to the right shows, the Saudis are charging a record large premium to their benchmark to customers…which hardly seems indicative of slowing demand due to poor economic growth. I’m of the opinion the oil selloff has been a bit overdone…though I’m certainly willing to entertain other opinions. Today’s Calendar (all times Central) • Trade Balance – 7:30am • Jobless Claims – 7:30am • EIA Natural Gas Storage – 9:30am • EIA Petroleum Inventories – 10:00am • Several Fed speakers Thanks for reading. David Zelinski dzelinski@nesvick.com 901-766-4684 Trillian IM: dzelinski@nesvick.com DISCLAIMER: This communication is a solicitation for entering into derivatives transactions. It is for clients, affiliates, and associates of Nesvick Trading Group, LLC only. The information contained herein has been taken from trade and statistical services and other sources we believe are reliable. Opinions expressed reflect judgments at this date and are subject to change without notice. These materials represent the opinions and viewpoints of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or trading strategies of Nesvick Trading Group LLC and its subsidiaries. Nesvick Trading Group, LLC does not guarantee that such information is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Officers, employees, and affiliates of Nesvick Trading Group, LLC may or may not, from time to time, have long or short positions in, and buy or sell, the securities and derivatives (for their own account or others), if any, referred to in this commentary. There is risk of loss in trading futures and options and it is not suitable for all investors. PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RETURNS. Nesvick Trading Group LLC is not responsible for any redistribution of this material by third parties or any trading decision taken by persons not intended to view this material. 6
You can also read