Novel Tubular Carbon Membranes Prepared from Natural Rattans - MDPI
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
C Journal of Carbon Research Communication Novel Tubular Carbon Membranes Prepared from Natural Rattans Xuezhong He Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; xuezhong.he@ntnu.no; Tel.: +47-73-593-942 Received: 7 December 2018; Accepted: 29 January 2019; Published: 1 February 2019 Abstract: The novel tubular carbon membranes produced from natural materials are, for the first time, reported. The novelty of this idea is to use natural rattans as precursors for making carbon membranes to address the challenges of cellulose polymers. The rattan precursors were carbonized to present evenly distributed channels inside the tubular carbon membranes. Each channel has an inner diameter of 2 × 10−4 m with a dense-selective inner layer and a porous outer layer. Future work on selection of suitable rattans, proper pre-treatment, carbon structure tailoring can be conducted to open a new research field of carbon membranes/materials. Keywords: rattan; tubular carbon membrane; carbonization; gas separation 1. Introduction Membrane technology possesses many advantages such as small footprint, low capital and operating cost, and being environmentally friendly to be an alternative technology for gas separation compared to the conventional separation technologies (e.g., cryogenic distillation, chemical and physical absorption). He et al. reviewed the polymeric and inorganic (carbon, ceramic, metallic, zeolites, etc.) membranes for various gas separation processes [1], and membrane gas separation is expected to play an important role in the selected environment and energy processes, such as CO2 capture, natural gas sweetening, biogas upgrading, and hydrogen purification. The polymeric membranes are dominating the current industrial gas separation, but the trade-off of permeability/selectivity as well as the chemical and mechanical stabilities limits their applications in the adverse conditions (e.g., high pressure and/or high temperature processes). Developing alternative carbon membranes shows a nice potential. Carbon membranes are ultra-microporous inorganic membranes made from the carbonization of polymeric precursors such as polyimide, polyacrylonitile (PAN), poly(phthalazinone ether sulfone ketone), poly(phenylene oxide) and cellulose derivatives [2]. In the last decade, great attention was placed on the development of supported carbon membranes [3,4] and self-support carbon membranes [5]. Ceramic-supported carbon membranes was reported for high temperature applications (e.g., H2 /CO2 separation from syngas and carbon membrane reactors) [6]. However, preparation of a thin, defect-free carbon-selective layer on the top of support, increase of the compatibility between support and carbon layer and reduction of the production cost are still challenging [7]. Self-supported flat-sheet and hollow fiber carbon membranes prepared from polyimide precursors for CO2 /CH4 and olefin/paraffin separation have been reported in the literature [8,9], but the main challenge of the high production cost due to the non-commercial polyimide polymers hinders the upscaling. The Membrane Research (Memfo) team at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) developed the cellulosic-based hollow fiber carbon membranes with relatively good separation performance for CO2 /N2 , CO2 /CH4 separation [10–14]. However, there are still challenges related to: (1) hollow fiber precursors drying; (2) module construction due to the fragile and brittle carbon fibers; and (3) low gas C 2019, 5, 9; doi:10.3390/c5010009 www.mdpi.com/journal/carbon
C 2019, 5, 9 2 of 5 C 2019, 5 FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 5 permeance the withbrittle fragile and a symmetric carbonstructure. fibers; andThus, seeking 3) low gas novel precursors permeance with for preparation a symmetric of asymmetric structure. Thus, carbon membranes with high performance, low cost, good mechanical strength seeking novel precursors for preparation of asymmetric carbon membranes with high performance, and easy module construction low (e.g.,mechanical cost, good tubular) is essentially strength and required easy to bring carbon module membranes construction (e.g., into futureisapplications tubular) essentially in gas separation required to bring processes. carbon membranes into future applications in gas separation processes. The natural rattan materials have unique tubular structure as shown in Figure 1. For the rattan plants, water is initially absorbed from the underground and transported through the large channels from bottom to the top of trunk, and can also pass pass through thethe wall wall to to the the branches branches (further (further to to leafs), leafs), which indicates a porous structure along the channel channel wall of of rattan rattan materials. materials. The previous work reported on onthe production the productionof artificial bonesbones of artificial from rattan from woods rattanbywoods carbonization at high temperature by carbonization at high (e.g., 800–2000 ◦ C) [15]. Moreover, the rattan materials are mainly composed of cellulose, with small temperature (e.g., 800–2000 °C) [15]. Moreover, the rattan materials are mainly composed of cellulose, amounts with smallofamounts hemicellulose and lignin, of hemicellulose andand the chemical lignin, structurestructure and the chemical of rattanofisrattan quiteissimilar to the quite similar regenerated to cellulosecellulose the regenerated hollow fibers. hollowTherefore, in principle, fibers. Therefore, in self-supported tubular carbon principle, self-supported membranes tubular carbon can be prepared membranes by prepared can be carbonization of rattan materials. by carbonization of rattan materials. Figure 1. Cross-section Cross-sectionofofrattan rattanmaterials: materials:(a)(a) rattans with rattans withdifferent outer different diameters outer (2.75 diameters mmmm (2.75 to 7.5 to mm); (b) (b) 7.5 mm); tested rattan tested (outer rattan diameter, (outer do =d3.25 diameter, × 10×m); −3 − 3 10 (c)m); SEM(c)image. o = 3.25 SEM image. 2. Material 2. Material and and Methods Methods −3 m were provided by the Institute of The natural The natural rattans rattans with with an an outer outer diameter diameter of 3.25×× 10 of 3.25 10−3 m were provided by the Institute of Process Engineering, Process Engineering, Chinese Chinese Academy Academy ofof Sciences. Sciences. Acetic Acetic acid acid was was purchased purchased from from Sigma-Aldrich Sigma-Aldrich (Oslo, Norway). The raw rattan was pre-hydrolyzed using an acetic acid aqueous solution (Oslo, Norway). The raw rattan was pre-hydrolyzed using an acetic acid aqueous solution (50 (50 vol.%) vol.%) at 90 ◦ C overnight to partly remove hemicellulose, and increase the cellulose content in the precursors. at 90 °C overnight to partly remove hemicellulose, and increase the cellulose content in the The pre-treated precursors. The rattan was carbonized pre-treated rattan wasincarbonized the furnaceinupthe 550 ◦ C using to furnace up tothe 550protocol °C usingreported in the the protocol reported in the previous work [14]. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) from TA Instruments USA), previous work [14]. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) from TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, (New model Q500 Castle, DE, and scanning USA), modelelectron Q500 microscopy and scanning(SEM) from Hitachi electron High Technology microscopy (SEM) from (TM3030 Hitachitabletop High microscope, (TM3030 Technology Lidingø, tabletop Sweden)microscope, were used to characterize Lidingø, Sweden)the were structure, usedmorphology and to characterize property the of structure, rattans and carbon membranes. morphology and property of rattans and carbon membranes. 3. Results and Discussion 3. Results and Discussion The Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) study on one type of rattan material showed the similar The Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) study on one type of rattan material showed the similar weight loss compared to the deacetylated cellulose acetate (DCA) precursors reported in our previous weight loss compared to the deacetylated cellulose acetate (DCA) precursors reported in our previous work [14] (shown in Figure 2, raw rattan, acetic acid processed rattan (AA (acetic acid pretreated) work [14] (shown in Figure 2, raw rattan, acetic acid processed rattan (AA (acetic acid pretreated) rattan), and DCA materials). A relatively low decomposition temperature range (220–320 ◦ C) was rattan), and DCA materials). A relatively low decomposition temperature range (220–320 °C) was found due to the present of hemicellulose and lignin in rattan materials compared to the regenerated cellulose (DCA) precursor (290–350 °C) which contained almost pure cellulose. Pre-hydrolysis of
C 2019, 5 FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 5 wood using acetic acid at high temperature was reported to partly remove hemicellulose, and increase Cthe 2019,cellulose 5, 9 content [16], which has also been documented from the TGA 3results of 5 (AA rattan in Figure 2). Compared to the raw rattan materials, the decomposition temperature of the pre- treated rattan shifted towards the DCA precursor. The carbonization experiments of pre-treated found due to the present of hemicellulose and lignin in rattan materials compared to the regenerated rattan precursors cellulose (DCA) (i.e.,precursor rattans(290–350 soaked◦ C) inwhich a 50 contained vol.% acetic almost acid purefor 2 h) were cellulose. conducted Pre-hydrolysis at the final of wood temperature usingof 550acid acetic °C,atand highthe SEM images temperature of the cross-sections was reported to partly removeof carbon membranes hemicellulose, and increase aretheshown in cellulose content [16], which has also been documented from the TGA Figure 3. It was found that rattan precursors can be carbonized under the controlled carbonization results (AA rattan in Figure 2). Compared to the raw rattan materials, the decomposition condition and presented the evenly distributed channels inside the tubular carbon membranes temperature of the pre-treated rattan shifted towards the DCA precursor. The carbonization experiments of pre-treated rattan precursors (Figure 3a), and each channel (inner diameter, di = 2 × 10−4 m) showed an asymmetric structure with (i.e., rattans soaked in a 50 vol.% acetic acid for 2 h) were conducted at the final temperature of 550 ◦ C, a dense-selective and the SEM inner imageslayer and of the a porous (from cross-sections parenchyma of carbon membranes cells) are shownouter in layer Figure(Figure 3. It was 3b). found The outer diameterthatof rattan the prepared precursorscarbon membrane can be carbonized underwasthereduced controlled tocarbonization 2.2 × 10 mcondition −3 (shrinkage of around 30%). and presented The prepared carbon membranes showed a very porous structure, which indicates thechannel the evenly distributed channels inside the tubular carbon membranes (Figure 3a), and each processability (inner diameter, d = 2 × 10 −4 m) showed an asymmetric structure with a dense-selective inner layer in the preparation of carbon membranes from natural rattan precursors. However, the carbon i and a porous (from parenchyma cells) outer layer (Figure 3b). The outer diameter of the prepared membrane may have defects in the carbon matrix due to the high amount of residual lignin and carbon membrane was reduced to 2.2 × 10−3 m (shrinkage of around 30%). The prepared carbon hemicellulose membranes existing showedin the rattan a very porousprecursors. By applying structure, which indicatesathe proper pre-treatment processability (to remove most in the preparation hemicellulose of carbon and lignin), afrom membranes suitable naturalpost-treatment rattan precursors. canHowever, potentially the mitigate the riskmay carbon membrane of the formation have defects inItthe of microvoids. is carbon worthmatrix notingduethat to thethehighinfluences amount of residual lignin and of cellulose hemicellulose content, existing inof rattan pre-treatment the rattan precursors. By applying a proper pre-treatment (to precursors and carbonization procedure (especially final temperature, heating rate, etc.) remove most hemicellulose and lignin), are expected a suitable post-treatment can potentially mitigate the risk of the formation of microvoids. It is worth to be crucial to prepare high selective carbon membranes. The understanding on how the pore noting that the influences of cellulose content, pre-treatment of rattan precursors and carbonization structureprocedure can be tuned by the (especially employment final of the pre-treatment temperature, heating for the rate, etc.) are expected to precursor be crucial toandprepareoptimization high of carbonization selective procedure is also very carbon membranes. The important. understanding It on should how the be pore noted that the structure canfocus be tunedof this work is to by the employment report the preparation of theofpre-treatment for the precursor carbon materials from anda newoptimization of carbonization biorenewable precursor procedure is also and no of rattans, very important. It should be noted that the focus of this work is systematic gas permeation testing and characterization are included. Thus, the extended researchto report the preparation of carbon materials from a new biorenewable precursor of rattans, and no systematic gas permeation testing work on selection of suitable rattans, proper pre-treatment, carbon structure tailoring should be and characterization are included. Thus, the extended research work on selection of suitable rattans, further investigated proper pre-treatment,to open a new carbon research structure field tailoring in the should be development further investigated of natural to open arattan-based new research carbon membranesfield for in thegas separation. development of natural rattan-based carbon membranes for gas separation. Figure 2.Figure 2. The results The TGA TGA results of rattan(dark of rattan (dark line), line),AA AArattan (blue(blue rattan dasheddashed line), andline), DCA and (pink DCA dashed(pink line). dashed line).
C 2019, 5, 9 4 of 5 C 2019, 5 FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 5 3. SEM images of the tubular carbon membranes from the rattan Figure 3. rattan precursor: precursor: (a) the whole −3−m); tubular (doo == 2.2 2.2 ××1010 3 m); (b)(b) single channel single (di(d channel = i2×10 =2× 10−4 m). −4 m). 4. Conclusions 4. Conclusions The The natural natural rattan-based rattan-based carbon carbon membranes membranes were were successfully successfully prepared prepared byby carbonization carbonization of of tubular rattan at a final temperature of 550 ◦ C. The prepared carbon membranes showed a very porous tubular rattan at a final temperature of 550 °C. The prepared carbon membranes showed a very structure. Some defects porous structure. Somemay existmay defects in theexist carbon matrix in the due matrix carbon to the presence of lignin due to the and hemicellulose presence of lignin and which need to which hemicellulose be avoided need by to applying be avoided suitable pre-treatment by applying suitablemethods. The novel pre-treatment tubular methods. Thecarbon novel membranes made from natural rattans will open a new research field for the development tubular carbon membranes made from natural rattans will open a new research field for the of carbon materials development for gas separation, of carbon but for materials the gas intensive research separation, but activities should the intensive be conducted research activities to explore should be its potential. conducted to explore its potential. Contributions: X.H. performed the experiments, Author Contributions: experiments, data data analysis, analysis, and and writing writing of of the the paper. paper. Funding: This research Funding: This research received received no no external external funding. funding. Acknowledgments: This work was conducted in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the Norwegian University of Science Acknowledgment: and This Technology. work The author was conducted in the acknowledges Department of Arne Lindbråthen Chemical and at Engineering Yunhan Chu for the the Norwegian discussion of the results. University of Science and Technology. The author acknowledges Dr. Arne Lindbråthen and Dr. Yunhan Chu Conflicts of Interest: for the discussion Theresults. of the author declare no conflict of interest. Conflicts of Interest: The author declare no conflict of interest. References References 1. He, X.; Hägg, M.-B. Membranes for environmentally friendly energy processes. Membranes 2012, 2, 706–726. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 1. He, X.; Hägg, M.-B. Membranes for environmentally friendly energy processes. Membranes 2012, 2, 706– 2. He, X.; Yu, Q.; Hägg, M.-B.; Hoek, E.M.V.; Tarabara, V.V. CO2 capture. In Encyclopedia of Membrane Science 726. and Technology; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. 2. He, X.; Yu, Q.; Hägg, M.-B.; Hoek, E.M.V.; Tarabara, V.V. CO2 capture. In Encyclopedia of Membrane Science 3. Briceño, K.; Montané, D.; Garcia-Valls, R.; Iulianelli, A.; Basile, A. Fabrication variables affecting the structure and Technology; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. and properties of supported carbon molecular sieve membranes for hydrogen separation. J. Membr. Sci. 3. Briceño, K.; Montané, D.; Garcia-Valls, R.; Iulianelli, A.; Basile, A. Fabrication variables affecting the 2012, 415, 288–297. [CrossRef] structure and properties of supported carbon molecular sieve membranes for hydrogen separation. J. 4. Briceño, K.; Iulianelli, A.; Montané, D.; Garcia-Valls, R.; Basile, A. Carbon molecular sieve membranes Membr. Sci. 2012, 415, 288–297. supported on non-modified ceramic tubes for hydrogen separation in membrane reactors. Int. J. Hydrogen 4. Briceño, K.; Iulianelli, A.; Montané, D.; Garcia-Valls, R.; Basile, A. Carbon molecular sieve membranes Energy 2012, 37, 13536–13544. [CrossRef] supported on non-modified ceramic tubes for hydrogen separation in membrane reactors. Int. J. Hydrogen 5. Lie, J.A.; He, X.; Kumakiri, I.; Kita, H.; Hägg, M.-B. 14 carbon based membranes. In H2 Production and Energy 2012, 37, 13536–13544. Separation/Purification; Basile, A., Dalena, F., Tong, J., Veziroglu, N., Eds.; Senior Commissioning Editor-Books: 5. Lie, J.A.; He, X.; Kumakiri, I.; Kita, H.; Hägg, M.-B. 14 carbon based membranes. In H2 Production and London, UK, 2017; pp. 405–431. Separation/Purification; Basile, A., Dalena, F., Tong, J., Veziroglu, N., Eds.; Senior Commissioning Editor- 6. Okamoto, K.; Kawamura, S.; Yoshino, M.; Kita, H.; Hirayama, Y.; Tanihara, N.; Kusuki, Y. Olefin/paraffin Books: London, UK, 2017; pp. 405–431. separation through carbonized membranes derived from an asymmetric polyimide hollow fiber membrane. 6. Okamoto, K.; Kawamura, S.; Yoshino, M.; Kita, H.; Hirayama, Y.; Tanihara, N.; Kusuki, Y. Olefin/paraffin Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 4424–4432. [CrossRef] separation through carbonized membranes derived from an asymmetric polyimide hollow fiber 7. Salleh, W.N.W.; Ismail, A.F. Carbon membranes for gas separation processes: Recent progress and future membrane. Ind. perspective. Eng. Chem. J. Membr. Res.2015, Sci. Res. 1999,1,38, 4424–4432. 2–15. 7. Salleh, W.N.W.; Ismail, A.F. Carbon membranes for gas separation processes: Recent progress and future perspective. J. Membr. Sci. Res. 2015, 1, 2–15. 8. Rungta, M.; Xu, L.; Koros, W.J. Carbon molecular sieve dense film membranes derived from matrimid® for ethylene/ethane separation. Carbon 2012, 50, 1488–1502.
C 2019, 5, 9 5 of 5 8. Rungta, M.; Xu, L.; Koros, W.J. Carbon molecular sieve dense film membranes derived from matrimid®for ethylene/ethane separation. Carbon 2012, 50, 1488–1502. [CrossRef] 9. Bhuwania, N.; Labreche, Y.; Achoundong, C.S.K.; Baltazar, J.; Burgess, S.K.; Karwa, S.; Xu, L.; Henderson, C.L.; Williams, P.J.; Koros, W.J. Engineering substructure morphology of asymmetric carbon molecular sieve hollow fiber membranes. Carbon 2014, 76, 417–434. [CrossRef] 10. He, X.; Hagg, M.-B. Optimization of carbonization process for preparation of high performance hollow fiber carbon membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 8065–8072. [CrossRef] 11. He, X.; Hägg, M.-B. Hollow fiber carbon membranes: Investigations for CO2 capture. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 378, 1–9. [CrossRef] 12. He, X.; Hägg, M.-B. Structural, kinetic and performance characterization of hollow fiber carbon membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 390, 23–31. [CrossRef] 13. He, X.; Hägg, M.-B. Hollow fiber carbon membranes: From material to application. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 215, 440–448. [CrossRef] 14. He, X.; Lie, J.A.; Sheridan, E.; Hagg, M.-B. Preparation and characterization of hollow fiber carbon membranes from cellulose acetate precursors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 2080–2087. [CrossRef] 15. Tampieri, A.; Sprio, S.; Ruffini, A.; Will, J.; Greil, P.; Müller, F.; Martínez, F.J.; Torres, R.C.; Varela, F.F.M.; Ramírez, R.J. Implants for Load Bearing Bone Substitutions Having Hierarchical Organized Architecture Deriving from Transformation of Vegetal Structures. U.S. Patent No. 9,326,948, 8 November 2018. 16. Li, H.; Saeed, A.; Jahan, M.S.; Ni, Y.; van Heiningen, A. Hemicellulose removal from hardwood chips in the pre-hydrolysis step of the kraft-based dissolving pulp production process. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2010, 30, 48–60. [CrossRef] © 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
You can also read