Not another presentation on net neutrality - Iván Rejón & Alfonso Aguado Strategy, Marketing & Com - Observatorio de la ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Ericsson at a glance NETWORKS IT MEDIA INDUSTRIES Create one network for Achieve business agility Delight the TV Connect industries for a million different needs with transformative IT consumer every day business acceleration 39,000 1 billion 247 B. SEK Subscribers Patents managed by us Net Sales 23,700 R&D Employees 2.5 billion Subscribers supported by us 180 Countries with customers 32,8 B. SEK In R&D 66,000 Services professionals 116,000 Employees Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 3 Full year 2015 figures
Ericsson Born in a at a glance: garage? 140 years OF INNOVATION Sources: Google Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 4
Ericsson …, we were atalso a glance: born in 140 a garage years OF INNOVATION 140 yr ago Sources: Google Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 5
INDEX This session is structured in 3 blocks 1. A complex and controversial topic 2. De-constructing Net Neutrality • Digital ‘laws’ • Market: a new normal • Regulation and the basics • Market asymmetries 3. Towards a level playing field • Ericsson vision Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 7
OLD stuff? The concept predates the current debate …, existing since the age of the telegraph. In In 1888, A. B. Strowger, suspecting his loss of 1860, a US federal law* was passed to business was caused by a telephone operator subsidize a telegraph line: redirecting his business calls to a competitor, invented a switch messages received from any individual, company, or corporation, or from any telegraph lines connecting with this line at either of its termini, shall be impartially transmitted in the order of their reception, excepting that the dispatches of the government shall have priority ... that effectively removed human interference of telephone calls Sources: Wikipedia. * Pacific Telegraph Act of 1860 Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 9
+3,560,000 results on Net neutrality on the web Sources: Google Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 10
…, and ideological discussions Sources: Google Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 12
Not based on rational & scientific grounds Meaningless & vague Meaningful & scientific Neutral(ity) • • Stochastic Discrimination • • Emergent Throttling • • Random(ness) Priorit(isation) • • (Non)Deterministic Violation • • Semantics QoS • • Probabilistic Speed • • Statistical Multiplex(ing) Sources: Slideshare; Martin Geddes Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 13
Net neutrality*: a couple of definitions is the principle that ISPs and governments refers to a debate about the way that ISPs regulating the Internet should treat all data on the manage the ‘traffic’ carried on their networks when Internet the same, not discriminating or charging data is requested by broadband subscribers** differentially by user, content, website, platform, from providers of content, applications or services application, type of attached equipment, or mode as well as when traffic is exchanged between end- of communication. users. The best effort internet is about the equal treatment of data traffic being transmitted over the internet, no matter (Wikipedia. *Coined by Columbia University media law professor what it contains, which application transmits the data, Tim Wu in 2003) where it comes from or where it goes. (BEREC 2016, * 'end-users' under EU law) Sources: Wikipedia, BEREC Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 15
…, but different flavors ‘Weak’ ‘Strong’ Individual prioritization No direct enforcement Discrimination based without throttling or Full neutrality on type of data blocking • Enforcement based on • Paid-prioritization of • Reasonable (and • Discrimination in limited other laws, eg., anti- bandwidth / sponsored transparent) trade-offs conditions, eg. preventing competitive practices, data agreements can between the requirements spam, malware, or illegal 'commercially induce optimal user of different applications content ensuring privacy reasonable' practices welfare (eg., low latency and low and security (CL), jitter: voice and RT video), exceptions for congestion, rather than neutral security, spam, or legal transmissions regardless reasons (NL) of applications Sources: Google Sources: Wikipedia Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 16
…, intertwined with other complex issues, contaminating the debate Security and Privacy and emergency confidentiality services Information freedom Copyright Portability Competition Consumer protection Accessibility and Interoperability universal service Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 17
…, and prone to ‘structural’ contradictions and inconsistencies Imposition of neutrality obligations to online intermediaries (eg., anonymity) other regulations are requiring them to be more proactive in content management, prioritization and editing Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 18
De-constructing Net neutrality Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 19
PACE OF CHANGE 15 yr 50 b connected devices 40 Connections (b) 30 25 yr 5 b connected people 20 100 yr 10 1 b connected places Source: Ericsson 1875 Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 22 1975 2000 2020
Exponential pace of disruption Time to reach 100 million users Pokémon Go 0 25 days July, 6th 2016 Candy Crush 1 yr, 3 m 2012 Apple App Store 2 yr, 2 m 2008 Instagram 2 yr, 4 m 2010 Whatsapp 3 yr, 4 m 2009 Facebook 4 yr, 6 m 2004 iTunes 6 yr, 5 m 2003 WWW 7 yr, 5 m 1990 Mobile phone 16 yr 1979 Source: BCG, Techcrunch, Wikipedia Telephone 75yr 1878 Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 23
Combinatorial - new propositions 1991: Total Cost $3054.82 2015: Smartphone $299.00 Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 27
Combinatorial - New corporate leaders The Age of Tech: Market cap of the most valuable companies Source: The Economist, Statista, * as of August, 1st Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 29
Combinatorial - New corporate leaders tech BEASTS The Age of Tech Beasts Source: The Economist, Statista, * as of August, 1st Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 30
A ‘new normal’ In Spain the market has destroyed €9,7 b in the last six years Revenues (€ b) EBITDA (€ b) 35,0 -5,2 14,0 CAGR -8,9 25,4 Movistar -7% CAGR Vodafone -6% 8,0 Orange +6% -9,5% Yoigo +12% -19,8% Ono +8,1%% Jazztel -10% DTS 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015e 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Source: CNMC. Orange includes Jazztel from Q3 2015. Movistar includes DTS from Q2 2015. Source: AMETIC Vodafone includes Ono from Q3 2014 Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 36
A ‘new normal’ In four acts New demands • Eg. #1: from a New patterns fragmented offering to • Eg. #1: explosion of convergent bundles MBB traffic • Eg. #2: shift from fixed to mobile viewing, from linear TV to streaming New expectation • Eg. #1 improve coverage to be New attitudes captured • Eg. #1: emergence of • Eg. #2 differentiate app new segments coverage • Eg. #2: important • Eg. #3 poor digital reduction of piracy experiences lead to frustration and erode NPS Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 38
A ‘new normal’ New patterns. 1) traffic explosion Monthly traffic per connection Fixed (MB) Mobile (MB) 2016 2021 45200 1000 Monthly mobile traffic 40200 35200 900 800 1 EB 6.7 EB 47% CAGR 30200 Monthly mobile consumption 700 x1.5 9 25200 600 2 GB 18 GB X 20200 Growth 500 15200 x2 10200 400 2014 2019 5200 300 Mobile traffic as % of total IP traffic 0 200 0 200 Q4 2012 Q4 2013 Q4 2014 Q4 2015 4% 10% X 2.5 Share Source: CNMC, Ericsson Mobility Report, Cisco Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 39
A ‘new normal’ New patterns. 2) from fixed to mobile media experience Weekly TV/video viewing time, per device TV Desktop Laptop Smartphone Tablet ~65% watch TV & video on their 100% smartphones, increase of >135% since 2012 Smartphone, 75% tablet & Laptop 50% 41% think it is very important to watch 25% TV their TV and Video & Desktop content wherever they are 0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Spain. *3 years moving average ¼, ½, ¼ Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 40
A ‘new normal’ New patterns. 2) from linear to streaming video consumption % of people watching different media at least once per day Scheduled linear TV Streamed on demand video (YouTube, short clips, movies, Recorded linear TV TV series and programs) 100% >50% watch streamed on-demand 75% each day up from >30% 50% in 2010 25% 0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Spain 3 years moving average ¼, ½, ¼ (self reported) Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 41
A ‘new normal’ New demands. 1) from a fragmented offering to convergent bundles Number of packaged services, by type 10 Opportunities & 9 Challenges 8 2P › Content rights 7 4P › Data monetization, beyond 6 pure connectivity (eg., 5 games, alarms, etc.) 4 5P 3 › Superior customer 2 experience 3P 1 › Simplification and 0 operational efficiency Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 Source: CNMC Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 42
A ‘New Normal’ New attitudes. 1) emergence of new market segments % of people watching different % of total TV-time by age group, media, per age per device Scheduled linear TV Streamed on demand video TV Desktop Laptop Smartphone Tablet (YouTube, short clips, movies, Recorded linear TV TV series and programs) 100% 100% Smartphone, 75% 75% tablet & laptop 8 out of 10 teenagers 50% 65% 50% watch streamed of all TV/video content, compared to viewing hrs spent on 2 out of 10 aged 60- 25% a mobile device 25% 69 screen among TV screen teenagers & Desktop 0% 0% 16-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-59 60-69 16-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-59 Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab BASE: Population aged 16-69 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Spain BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Spain [Showing: Use once per day or more, self reported] Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 43
A ‘new normal’ New attitudes. 2) pirates of last resort? % of users of streaming and on demand services (2011 vs. 2015) Some factors 96 2015 55 pp. › Availability of a diverse 2011 84 and differential offering 32 25 25 29 › Competition of OTT 22 services (pure and 18 19 16 hybrids) 14 10 9 7 2 2 5 5 4 › Competition between CSPs: quality, price Jazzbox Mi Tele streaming TV Videoclub Canal+ Yombi Pirate P2P TV5/Cuatro A3Player Web RTVE YouTube Videoclub Vodafone Orange Web Pirate Movistar Source: Ericsson Base: Spanish on-demand (streaming & downloading content) users (948 users out of 1000) Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 44
A ‘new normal’ New expectations. 2) from ‘coverage’ to app coverage Percentage of smartphone users who have App coverage stopped using apps due to bad coverage › +50% of ‘power’ and video-centric app users report issues › consumers build perceptions of network performance based on how well their video streaming apps perform › the proportion of users who are satisfied with using apps drops by Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab, half when moving from Base: Smartphone users in Brazil, India, Japan, South Korea, the UK and the US outdoor to indoor Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 46
A ‘new normal’ New expectations. 3) poor digital experiences leads to frustration and erode NPS If mobile videos take > 2s to Mobile delays comparable to .., heart rate load, NPS may drop by at watching a horror movie increases 38% least 4 points Impact on NPS 1= Max 0.8 0.6 +4.5 +38% Delays 0.4 0.2 No delays -4 0 Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 48
A ‘new normal’ …, while fostering the deployment of high performance NGNs Spain: #1 in the EU in terms of fiber subscribers ‘in 2020, 97% of Spanish households will have fiber… 4G coverage will reach 100%. The digital divide won’t longer exist. We will be the only country with digital services in every corner’ (L. M. Gilpérez, CEO Telefonica España) Source: Press clippings, OpenSignal Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 50
A ‘new normal’ The telco-ecosystem faces some structural changes that torpedo their traditional business model change change change change change #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Decoupling Customer & New Platforms, between Brand consumption Disruptive Agility, Talent, ... revenues and experience, patterns models traffic Simplicity ..., the binominal ..., digital ..., the telco ..., successful ..., other players brand – service is platforms capture industry has competition better satisfy new the new a entered a non- requires new demands engagement disproportionate profit zone capabilities driver share of value Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 53
A ‘new normal’ The decoupling between revenues, CapEx and traffic growth Revenue, CapEx and traffic growth (2010=100) 120 40,000 34,300 110 35,000 30,000 100 100 25,000 90 20,000 Telco revenues (left) 80 Telco CapEx (left) 15,000 Monthly data traffic (right) 70 69 10,000 60 5,000 54 50 0100 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Source: Ericsson, Ovum Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 54
A ‘new normal’ …, compromising their viability No operator can justify continuing to invest if it cannot Key competitors variables foresee acceptable return on capital: Vodafone+Ono, Orange and Yoigo have ROCE well below cost of capital (10-12%) Arthur D. Little Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 55
A ‘new normal’ A profitability puzzle: the example of US High Investment Sectors Raking by company Change in CapEx in H1 2016 (2015, $ b) (2015, $ b) Top 10 Investment Heroes 1. Telecom/Cable 48.1 1. AT&T 18.7 1. AT&T -16.7% 2. Energy production/Mining 33.8 2. Verizon 16.6 2. Verizon -14.4% 3. Internet/Technology 30.8 3. Exxon Mobil 11.0 3. Exxon Mobil -44.1% 4. ETE 9.4 4. Utility/Energy Distribution 27.5 5. Chevron 8.6 4. ETE +74.2% 5. Transportation 15.3 6. Walmart 8.5 5. Chevron -42.6% 6. Automotive/Industrial 12.9 7. Alphabet 8.4 6. Walmart -9.7% 7. Retail 8.5 8. Comcast 8.4 7. Alphabet -8.8% Total 176.9 9. Exelon 7.6 8. Comcast +28.0% 10. Duke Energy 6.6 11. Apple 6.4 9. Exelon +79.5% 12. American Airlines 6.2 10. Duke Energy +41.4% 13. Phillips 66 5.7 ‘Investment Heroes’ because 14. Microsoft 5.6 their capital spending is 15. Amazon.com 5.5 16. GM 5.4 helping raise productivity 17. ConocoPhillips 5.1 and wages across the 18. Intel 4.8 …, it seems possible that country 19. Union Pacific 4.7 the prospect of continued 20. FedEx 4.5 (PPI) 21. Time Warner 4.4 regulatory upheavals is 22. Ford 4.0 influencing capital 23. EPP 3.8 investment Source: PPI 24. GE 3.5 (PPI) 25. Freeport 3.4 Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 57
A ‘new normal’ Platform business model economics are far superior How Apple uses developers to drive external investment $9.5 b (2011) We run the App Store just Developers investment a little over breakeven Peter Oppenheimer, Apple CFO 7x 25x $233 b (2015) iOS device sales $1.3 b (2011) Apple app store cost Source: Visio Mobile Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 58
A ‘new normal’ …, but lead to quasi monopolies Global Mobile OS Global Mobile US video visits US mobile ad revenue market share search market share market share market share (Q2 2016) (Q3 2016) (Q3 2016) (Q3 2016) Facebook Twitter Netflix 19% Yahoo IOS 8% Hulu Yahoo 86% 13% 94% 4% 77% Bing 32% Bing 1% Baidu Other Google Other Other Android Google Youtube Other Source: Statista, NetmarketShare, eMarketer Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 59
Regulation & the basics Net neutrality Trojan Horse [ 1700s ] Ben Franklin reorganizes postal service to operate as a common carrier [ 1800s ] Telegraph regulated as [ Tim Wu. Feb. 2003 ] common carrier [ Late 1800s ] Telephone regulated as • Design principle/'Neutral common carrier [ 1934 ] Telephone Carrier regulation platform' transferred to FCC • Last mile [ 1966 ] Computer Inquiries Initiated • Right of users to access [ Late 1990s ] Open Access Proceedings content, services, applications of their choice Network Neutrality, • Operator should not interfere Broadband with users’ use but can 'police Discrimination. what they own' Journal of • A hard rule only if necessary (ok Telecommunications if operators uphold the principle and High Technology Law, Vol. 2, p. 141, on their own) 2003 Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 61
Regulation & the basics It all began in 1999 – last millennium… Cable ‘walled garden’ fears US/ FCC’s Internet. Policy Statement • Mergers: cable TV/broadband 2005 companies • BB users are entitled to run Web • AT&T/MediaOne and apps/services of their choice & connect AOL/TimeWarner their choice of legal devices to the network 24 May, 1999. AOL, WorldCom and other US/ FCC’s 2010 open internet rules Internet companies • Basic rules: transparency, no blocking • …, urged federal authorities to bar cable and no unreasonable discrimination. operators striking exclusive deals on • For mobile broadband providers, the no high-speed Internet service blocking rule applied only to the blocking • Internet providers want to be sure that of lawful websites, or applications that consumers will enjoy the same open competed with mobile operators’ voice or access to their services via cable video telephony services. The no networks that they now have over phone discrimination rule applied only to fixed lines,...' providers Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 62
Regulation & the basics Legislation & ‘Economy' Private property is the Digital technology, if ownership, control, employment, unshackled from ownership ability to dispose of, and What restrictions and payment bequeath land and other forms requirements is a powerful of property by persons and prevails ? means for creating a more privately-owned firms egalitarian society Do States regulate private infrastructures ? Not so new ? Pacific Telegraph Act of 1860 (US federal law passed to subsidize a telegraph line): …, messages received from any individual, company, or corporation, or from any telegraph lines connecting with this line at either of its termini, shall be impartially transmitted in order of their reception excepting that the dispatches of the government shall have priority (…)* Source: An act to facilitate communication between the Atlantic and the pacific states by electric telegraph, June 16, 1860- Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 63
Regulation & the basics Net Neutrality in USA [Open Internet Order] Feb. 2015 No Blocking: [Internet Service Providers ('ISPs')] shall not block Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, GN Docket lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject No. 14-28, Report & Order on Remand, Declaratory to reasonable network management. 13 Ruling, and Order, 30 FCC Rcd. 5601 (2015) No throttling: [ISPs] shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic The FCC’s order does not regulate Internet on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a interconnection, but it reserves the right to intervene on non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management. 14 a case-by-case basis No paid prioritization: [ISPs] shall not engage in paid prioritization. '‘Paid prioritization’ refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic . . .' 15 • FCC adopted on Feb 26th the new Open Internet order. To enable the imposition of strong non-discrimination rules, the FCC also reclassified fixed and mobile broadband providers as ‘common carriers’, enabling their regulation under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 • However, the Order will not apply a full utility-style regulation on ISPs (as implied by this reclassification), expressly excluding the imposition of any rate or tariff regulation, last-mile unbundling, burdensome administrative filing requirements or accounting standards • If, there is a future legal challenge and the courts confirm this reclassification, it will allow for the first time a thorough substantive legal examination of the merits of strict open internet rules Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 66
Regulation & the basics Regulatory approach in EU From … …, to Objective Non intervention Light-touch Regulation Commission Commission Commission EU (28/27) Non-binding Non-intervention Non-binding Binding Declaration Communication Recommendation TSM regulation Dec 2009 Apr 2011 May 2012 Nov 2015 End-users should be able Recognized the need for BEREC/Com. Report: Commissioner Kroes spoke to access and distribute traffic management. End 20% of mobile internet out against anti-competitive information, or run apps/ user's experience is not users face restrictions in blocking/throttling of internet services of their choice disrupted by congestion their ability to access VoIP traffic on May 30, 2013 Annex to the EU 2009 Time to see how EU 2009 Recommendation to Telecoms Single Market regulatory framework for regulatory framework improve transparency for (TSM) Regulation entered electronic communications works in practice end users into force on Nov 29, 2015 Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 67
Regulation & the basics Net neutrality in EU [Regulation 2015/2120] Nov. 2015 • All end-users have the right to access and distribute legal content, Regulation 2015/2120 of the European Parliament applications and services of their choice and of the Council of 25 November 2015 Laying • Providers of internet access services are required to treat all traffic equally Down Measures Concerning Open Internet Access • Reasonable traffic management is allowed. Providers may use measures and Amending Directive 2002/22/EC on based on objective technical requirements, not commercial considerations Universal Service and Users’ Rights Relating to • Blocking or throttling is allowed. Only to block illegal content, counter a Electronic Communications Networks and cyber attack or deal with exceptional or temporary traffic congestion Services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on • Services optimized for specific content is allowed. Agreements on services Roaming on Public Mobile Communications optimized for specific content will be allowed where necessary, but providers Networks Within the Union, 2015 O.J. (L 310) 1 will have to ensure the general quality of internet access services. Examples: managed IPTV and high-definition video conferencing Next steps: • 'Zero-rating' practices are not explicitly banned. Will have to be assessed Review of the Regulation: by April 30, 2019 and by the NRAs on a case-by-case basis to establish harm to end-users before every four years thereafter they can be prohibited • Is NN directly imposed in all member states? Yes The Regulation 2015/2120 applies directly. Member states do not have to transpose it into national law. • What happens with existing national NN provisions? Member states should withdraw, by Dec. 31/2016 …, any national regulation, that does not comply with the Regulation 2015/2120 • Is it clear what is expected ISPs? No. Regulation leaves a lot of scope for interpretation …, therefore, BEREC, which assembles the European NRAs, has released guidelines that entered into force on Aug. 30, 2016 to be applied by NRAs on the implementation of the NN provisions Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 68 (*) 14 Oct 2016 : The Dutch Parliament has adopted a revised net neutrality law
Regulation & the basics Net neutrality in EU What happens with Is NN directly imposed Is it clear what is existing national NN in all member states? expected ISPs? provisions? Yes Member states No. …, the Regulation 2015/2120 should withdraw, by Leaves a lot of scope applies directly. Member states do not have to Dec 31, 2016 for interpretation transpose it into national law …, any national regulation, …, BEREC, has released guidelines that does not comply with the that entered into force on Aug. 30, Regulation 2015/2120 2016 to be applied by NRAs on the implementation of the NN provisions Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 69 (*) 14 Oct 2016 : The Dutch Parliament has adopted a revised net neutrality law
Regulation & the basics Net neutrality in Spain Legislation No specific legislation on net neutrality. (Transitory period for member states to remove any existing measures not complying with the net neutrality provisions: Dec 31, 2016) The relevant provisions under the Universal service Directive (USD) were transposed via the Royal Decree-law 13/2012 of March 2012. The new Telecommunications Law does not contain any additional general provision in this regard Players and actions Players and actions Secretary of State for Information Society and National Authority for markets and Competition Digital Agenda (SETSI). Monitoring of the QoS in (CNMC). Input for the annual implementation the sector, and specific aspects such as internet reports - deadline for CNMC to report to BEREC speed and other parameters and the Commission: Jun 30, 2017 Quarterly reports monitoring the quality of F and M BEREC guidelines for NRAs implementing the Telecoms Single electronic communications services with the objectives of Market Regulation (TSM) net neutrality provisions entered into force by Aug 30, 2016 facilitating transparency, guaranteeing minimum levels of quality, regulating the inclusion of these requirements in the contracts, and the inclusion of due compensation mechanisms Commission for the monitoring QoS. Includes several working groups, integrating representatives from the SETSI, operators, consumer protection authorities and regional governments Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 70
market asymmetries The fact-based narrative …, (1) telcos capture about …, (2) but growth has migrated to 36% of the B2C business Content, Online Services In the Digital value chain, … …, (3) while the Online Services and User Interface segments show much …, (4) and capture a higher market concentration disproportionate share of the value Source: AT Kearney Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 74
Market asymmetries The gatekeepers Services and contents Infrastructures Interfaces Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 80
market asymmetries NN does not properly address critical asymmetries Privacy and Accessibility and confidentiality of Interoperability universal service conversations Security and Portability Customer care emergency services Source: Telefonica Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 81
market asymmetries EU Net Neutrality Regulation ..., ensure that ISPs do not monitor specific content provided by the end- users themselves, such as text, pictures and video* Targeted advertising based on analysis of private conversations Source: Google, my own Yahoo Mailbox. * BEREC’s guidelines on EU Net Neutrality implementation Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 82
market asymmetries EU Net Neutrality Regulation …, between specific content, applications or services there should be no discrimination* +45% engagement based on pure relevance rather than Google own ranks By concept Google’s Pagerank algorithm ranks content, ie., not all content is equal …, and Google skews search results which give Source: Digital Trends, RT, Harvard Business School. * BEREC’s guidelines on EU Net Neutrality implementation own services priority Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 83
market asymmetries EU Net Neutrality Regulation …, between specific content, applications or services there should be no slowing down* Google will now favor pages that use its fast- loading tech X4 times faster load Source: Wired. * BEREC’s guidelines on EU Net Neutrality implementation Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 84
market asymmetries EU Net Neutrality Regulation …, between specific content, applications or services there should be no blocking* Facebook has quietly developed software to suppress posts from appearing in people’s news feeds (The NYT) Source: Facebook. * BEREC’s guidelines on EU Net Neutrality implementation Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 85
market asymmetries EU Net Neutrality Regulation …, [NN] exceptions are limited to: traffic management to comply with a legal order, to ensure security* Source: WhatsApp. * BEREC’s guidelines on EU Net Neutrality implementation Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 87
Towards a level playing field Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 88
Towards a level playing field • …, is a concept about fairness, not that each player has an equal chance to succeed, but that they all play by the same set of rules o In a game such as rugby, one team would have an unfair advantage if the field had a slope. Since some real-life playing fields do in fact have slopes, it is customary for teams to swap ends of the playing field at half time • A metaphorical playing field is said to be level if no external interference affects the ability of the players to compete fairly Source: Wikipedia Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 90
Towards a level playing field OTTs in the market place OTTs Operators • Do not pay network costs but derive large • Have lessor scope for revenues (flat rating) and revenues (sale of databases to brands or higher costs associated with network investment sponsorships) • Have traffic consumption that is out of line with the • Increasing in number and an offer taking up greater reality of use and beyond expectation; bandwidth • Generate value for the production of national • Do not contribute to the national creativity policy content, (contributing to audio-visual development) (giving value predominantly to international content) Not so new ? Pacific Telegraph Act of 1860 (US federal law passed to subsidize a telegraph line): …, messages received from any individual, company, or corporation, or from any telegraph lines connecting with this line at either of its termini, shall be impartially transmitted in order of their reception excepting that the dispatches of the government shall have priority (…) Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 91
Towards a level playing field A more balanced framework OTTs Operators • Do not pay network costs but derive large • Have lessor scope for revenues (flat rating) and revenues (sale of databases to brands or higher costs associated with network investment sponsorships) Limited • Nat./reg./local value Have traffic consumption that is out of line with the • national/regional/local Increasing in number and an offer taking up greater creation reality of use and beyond & expectation; bandwidth contribution • Generate value for the production of national employment/taxes • Do not contribute to the national creativity policy content, (contributing to audio-visual development) (giving value predominantly to international content) • Communication functions are routinely included • All OTTs’ services – as well as services into digital services (on-line gaming, social provided by telcos – being similar from the end- networks, e-commerce, CRM, e-administration, users point of view, should be subject to the voice or video services) Fair same horizontal consumer protection rules competition Future proof framework Same services need to fall under the same rules … end-to-end quality, emergency call functionality or any-to-any connectivity based on phone numbers are crucial when choosing services Specific rules for communication services, where necessary, should be applied independently from the nature of the provider but based on the characteristics of the service Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 92
Towards a level playing field Future-proof EU framework will have to review current NN rules Digital Single Market Better access for Innovative services and Enhance the growth consumers and advanced digital potential of the digital businesses networks economy • Unlock the potential of e- • Digital Content Initiative • Digitizing European comm. o AVMSD update Industry o Ending unjustified geo- o Assessment of online o Coordination EU/Nat blocking platforms Regulation initiatives o Consumer trust by • Cybersecurity PPP o Mobilize €50 billion PP harmonized rules • Telecom review: investment • Copyright modernization encouraging investment • European Cloud Initiative and better access to in connectivity • ICT Standards to ensure digital content by: interop. & facilitate uptake: • Enabling cross-border 5G, Cloud, IoT, Data Techs, portability Cybersecurity • E-Government Action Plan Yet to come: Yet to come: Yet to come: VAT modernization E-Privacy Review Data Economy initiative IPRED review Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 93
Towards a level playing field Current NN rules will have to be reviewed according to ECC objectives Connectivity package: Connectivity package: Reforms, programs, Strategic Objectives for 2025 initiatives 1. All main socio-economic drivers should 1. New European Electronic have access to extremely high - Communication Code (ECC) gigabit– connectivity and BEREC regulation to help 2. All urban areas and major roads and build future networks railways should have uninterrupted 2. The 5G action plan to foster 5G coverage and 5G should be European Industrial leadership commercially available in at least one 3. WiFI4EU (targeted voucher major city in each EU Member scheme) State by 2020 3. All European households, rural or urban, should have access to connectivity offering a download speed of at least 100 Mbps Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 95
Towards a level playing field A dynamic discussion • 5 Nov 2016. Forty U.S. Internet companies, including Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Twitter, have sent a letter to President-elect Donald Trump with a list of policy priorities, under the banner of the Internet Association • Some of the proposals might align with Trump's priorities, such as 'easing regulation on the sharing economy, lowering taxes on profits made from intellectual property, and applying pressure on Europe to not erect too many barriers.' Others might clash with Trump's vision, such as maintaining net neutrality rules • 'Donald Trump's presidential election victory has increased the chances that President Barack Obama's landmark net-neutrality rules could be rolled back' • 'Trump transition team picks regulation foe as telecom point man' • 'Trump Could Spell Big Trouble for Broadband, Net Neutrality' Source: Press clippings Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 97
Wrap-up Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 99
Wrap-up some Myths and realities (1/2) Layer Conclusion Myth Infrastructure • Access policies are insufficient to spur ultra-broadband Concentrated markets network investment always hurt the • PPP are necessary to sustain growth in higher layers above consumer bare infrastructure • Regulation can distort., eg. incentivizing short term technologies • Structural remedies are excessively rigid and extremely difficult to manage (eg., UK, Canada) Logic • NN can hardly achieve some of the objectives it is • The ‘more’ neutral, supposed to address the better • NN depends on a careful cost and benefit analysis, non on • NN promotes ideological positions diversity in terms of contents and apps Source: Andrea Renda. CEPS Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 100
Wrap-up some Myths and realities (2/2) Layer Conclusion Myth Platforms • Responsible cooperation with platforms may be the Best Online platforms regulatory approach • stifle innovations and • Competition regulation has to be carefully adapted to prohibit the entrance economic and Business dynamics of digital platforms of other players • ignore ‘niche’ contents User • Internet ecosystem depends more on its e2e architecture, • Users want a ‘neutral’ stimulating freedom tan on being ‘neutral’ network • Users benefit of a balanced regulatory framework: all layers • Early standardization have to be considered to provide an unique user experience is always good • Users are willing to trade-off some privacy for innovative and value-added services Source: Andrea Renda. CEPS Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 101
Wrap-up As NN is a highly biased, passionate and even ideological debate on an extremely complex issue (technical, economic, societal and legal) …, we need an informed discussion to ensure that the very principles of NN are guaranteed: ensure that the internet ecosystem can continue to flourish as an engine of innovation and freedom of expression Observatorio Industria 4.0 | 2016 | Page 102
You can also read