National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 - July 2020
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 July 2020
This National Policy Statement was approved by the Governor-General under section 52(2) of the Resource Management Act 1991 on 20 July 2020, and is published by the Minister for the Environment under section 54 of that Act. This National Policy Statement replaces the National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity 2016. 2 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020
Contents
Part 1: Preliminary provisions 5
1.1 Title 5
1.2 Commencement 5
1.3 Application 5
1.4 Definitions 5
1.5 Implementation by tier 3 local authorities 9
1.6 Incorporation by reference 9
Part 2: Objectives and policies 10
2.1 Objectives 10
2.2 Policies 10
Part 3: Implementation 14
3.1 Outline of part 14
Subpart 1 – Providing development capacity 14
3.2 Sufficient development capacity for housing 14
3.3 Sufficient development capacity for business land 14
3.4 Meaning of plan-enabled and infrastructure-ready 15
3.5 Availability of additional infrastructure 15
3.6 Housing bottom lines for tier 1 and 2 urban environments 15
3.7 When there is insufficient development capacity 16
Subpart 2 – Responsive planning 16
3.8 Unanticipated or out-of-sequence developments 16
Subpart 3 – Evidence-based decision-making 17
3.9 Monitoring requirements 17
3.10 Assessing demand and development capacity 17
3.11 Using evidence and analysis 18
Subpart 4 – Future Development Strategy (FDS) 18
3.12 Preparation of FDS 18
3.13 Purpose and content of FDS 18
3.14 What FDSs are informed by 19
3.15 Consultation and engagement 19
3.16 Review of FDS 20
3.17 Effect of FDS 20
3.18 FDS implementation plan 20
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 3Subpart 5 – Housing and Business Development Capacity Assessment (HBA) 21
3.19 Obligation to prepare HBA 21
3.20 Purpose of HBA 21
3.21 Involving development sector and others 21
3.22 Competitiveness margin 22
3.23 Analysis of housing market and impact of planning 22
3.24 Housing demand assessment 22
3.25 Housing development capacity assessment 23
3.26 Estimating what is feasible and reasonably expected to be realised 23
3.27 Assessment of sufficient development capacity for housing 24
3.28 Business land demand assessment 24
3.29 Business land development capacity assessment 25
3.30 Assessment of sufficient development capacity for business land 25
Subpart 6 – Intensification in tier 1 urban environments 26
3.31 Tier 1 territorial authorities implementing intensification policies 26
3.32 Qualifying matters 26
3.33 Requirements if qualifying matter applies 27
3.34 Effects on consideration of resource consents 27
Subpart 7 – Development outcomes for zones 27
3.35 Development outcomes for zones 27
3.36 Development outcomes consistent with intensification policies 28
3.37 Monitoring development outcomes 28
Subpart 8 – Car parking 28
3.38 Car parking 28
Part 4: Timing 30
4.1 Timeframes for implementation 30
Appendix: Tier 1 and tier 2 urban environments and local authorities 31
4 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020Part 1: Preliminary provisions
1.1 Title
This is the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020.
1.2 Commencement
This National Policy Statement comes into force on 20 August 2020.
See Part 4, which sets out timeframes for complying with different parts of this National
Policy Statement.
1.3 Application
This National Policy Statement applies to:
all local authorities that have all or part of an urban environment within their
district or region (ie, tier 1, 2 and 3 local authorities); and
planning decisions by any local authority that affect an urban environment.
However, some objectives, policies, and provisions in Parts 3 and 4 apply only to tier 1,
2, or 3 local authorities.
1.4 Interpretation
In this National Policy Statement:
accessible car park means a car park designed and marked (for instance, in accordance with
the mobility car parking scheme) for use by persons with a disability or with limited mobility
Act means the Resource Management Act 1991
active transport means forms of transport that involve physical exercise, such as walking or
cycling, and includes transport that may use a mobility aid such as a wheelchair
additional infrastructure means:
public open space
community infrastructure as defined in section 197 of the Local Government
Act 2002
land transport (as defined in the Land Transport Management Act 2003) that is
not controlled by local authorities
social infrastructure, such as schools and healthcare facilities
a network operated for the purpose of telecommunications (as defined in
section 5 of the Telecommunications Act 2001)
a network operated for the purpose of transmitting or distributing electricity
or gas
business land means land that is zoned, or identified in an FDS or similar strategy or plan,
for business uses in urban environments, including but not limited to land in the following:
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 5any industrial zone
the commercial zone
the large format retail zone
any centre zone, to the extent it allows business uses
the mixed use zone, to the extent it allows business uses
any special purpose zone, to the extent it allows business uses
centre zone means any of the following zones:
city centre zone
metropolitan centre zone
town centre zone
local centre zone
neighbourhood centre zone
commencement date means the date on which this National Policy Statement comes into
force (see clause 1.2)
community services means the following:
community facilities
educational facilities
those commercial activities that serve the needs of the community
competitiveness margin means the margin referred to in clause 3.22
decision-maker means any person exercising functions or powers under the Act
development capacity means the capacity of land to be developed for housing or for business
use, based on:
the zoning, objectives, policies, rules, and overlays that apply in the relevant
proposed and operative RMA planning documents; and
the provision of adequate development infrastructure to support the
development of land for housing or business use
development infrastructure means the following, to the extent they are controlled by a local
authority or council controlled organisation (as defined in section 6 of the Local Government
Act 2002):
network infrastructure for water supply, wastewater, or stormwater
land transport (as defined in section 5 of the Land Transport Management Act
2003)
FDS means the Future Development Strategy required by subpart 4 of Part 3
feasible means:
for the short term or medium term, commercially viable to a developer based on
the current relationship between costs and revenue
6 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020for the long term, commercially viable to a developer based on the current
relationship between costs and revenue, or on any reasonable adjustment
to that relationship
HBA means the Housing and Business Development Capacity Assessment required by
subpart 5 of Part 3
infrastructure-ready has the meaning in clause 3.4(3)
long term means between 10 and 30 years
long-term plan means a long-term plan (including the infrastructure strategy required to be
included in it) adopted by a local authority under section 93 of the Local Government Act 2002
medium term means between 3 and 10 years
nationally significant infrastructure means all of the following:
State highways
the national grid electricity transmission network
renewable electricity generation facilities that connect with the national grid
the high-pressure gas transmission pipeline network operating in the North Island
the refinery pipeline between Marsden Point and Wiri
the New Zealand rail network (including light rail)
rapid transit services (as defined in this clause)
any airport (but not its ancillary commercial activities) used for regular air
transport services by aeroplanes capable of carrying more than 30 passengers
the port facilities (but not the facilities of any ancillary commercial activities) of
each port company referred to in item 6 of Part A of Schedule 1 of the Civil
Defence Emergency Management Act 2002
planned in relation to forms or features of transport, means planned in a regional land
transport plan prepared and approved under the Land Transport Management Act 2003
plan-enabled has the meaning in clause 3.4(1)
planning decision means a decision on any of the following:
a regional policy statement or proposed regional policy statement
a regional plan or proposed regional plan
a district plan or proposed district plan
a resource consent
a designation
a heritage order
a water conservation order
public transport means any existing or planned service for the carriage of passengers
(other than an aeroplane) that is available to the public generally by means of:
a vehicle designed or adapted to carry more than 12 persons (including
the driver); or
a rail vehicle; or
a ferry
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 7qualifying matter has the meaning in clause 3.32
rapid transit service means any existing or planned frequent, quick, reliable and high-capacity
public transport service that operates on a permanent route (road or rail) that is largely
separated from other traffic
rapid transit stop means a place where people can enter or exit a rapid transit service,
whether existing or planned
RMA planning document means all or any of the following:
a regional policy statement
a regional plan
a district plan
short-medium term means within the next 10 years
short term means within the next 3 years
tier 1 local authority means each local authority listed in column 2 of table 1 in the Appendix,
and tier 1 regional council and tier 1 territorial authority have corresponding meanings
tier 2 local authority means each local authority listed in column 2 of table 2 in the Appendix,
and tier 2 regional council and tier 2 territorial authority have corresponding meanings
tier 3 local authority means a local authority that has all or part of an urban environment
within its region or district, but is not a tier 1 or 2 local authority, and tier 3 regional council
and tier 3 territorial authority have corresponding meanings
tier 1 urban environment means an urban environment listed in column 1 of table 1 in
the Appendix
tier 2 urban environment means an urban environment listed in column 1 of table 2 in
the Appendix
tier 3 urban environment means an urban environment that is not listed in the Appendix
urban environment means any area of land (regardless of size, and irrespective of local
authority or statistical boundaries) that:
is, or is intended to be, predominantly urban in character; and
is, or is intended to be, part of a housing and labour market of at least
10,000 people
well-functioning urban environment has the meaning in Policy 1.
Terms defined in the Act and used in this National Policy Statement have the meanings
in the Act, unless otherwise specified.
Terms defined in the National Planning Standard issued under section 58E of the Act
and used in this National Policy Statement have the meanings in that Standard), unless
otherwise specified.
A reference in this National Policy Statement to a zone is:
a reference to that zone as described in Standard 8 (Zone Framework Standard)
of the National Planning Standard; or
a reference to the nearest equivalent zone, in relation to local authorities
that have not yet implemented the Zone Framework in the National
Planning Standard.
8 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 20201.5 Implementation by tier 3 local authorities
Tier 3 local authorities are strongly encouraged to do the things that tier 1 or 2 local
authorities are obliged to do under Parts 2 and 3 of this National Policy Statement,
adopting whatever modifications to the National Policy Statement are necessary or
helpful to enable them to do so.
1.6 Incorporation by reference
Clause 2(1) of Schedule 1AA of the Act does not apply to any material incorporated by
reference in this National Policy Statement.
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 9Part 2: Objectives and policies
2.1 Objectives
Objective 1: New Zealand has well-functioning urban environments that enable all people and
communities to provide for their social, economic, and cultural wellbeing, and for their health
and safety, now and into the future.
Objective 2: Planning decisions improve housing affordability by supporting competitive land
and development markets.
Objective 3: Regional policy statements and district plans enable more people to live in, and
more businesses and community services to be located in, areas of an urban environment in
which one or more of the following apply:
the area is in or near a centre zone or other area with many employment
opportunities
the area is well-serviced by existing or planned public transport
there is high demand for housing or for business land in the area, relative
to other areas within the urban environment.
Objective 4: New Zealand’s urban environments, including their amenity values, develop
and change over time in response to the diverse and changing needs of people, communities,
and future generations.
Objective 5: Planning decisions relating to urban environments, and FDSs, take into
account the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi (Te Tiriti o Waitangi).
Objective 6: Local authority decisions on urban development that affect urban
environments are:
integrated with infrastructure planning and funding decisions; and
strategic over the medium term and long term; and
responsive, particularly in relation to proposals that would supply significant
development capacity.
Objective 7: Local authorities have robust and frequently updated information about their
urban environments and use it to inform planning decisions.
Objective 8: New Zealand’s urban environments:
support reductions in greenhouse gas emissions; and
are resilient to the current and future effects of climate change.
2.2 Policies
Policy 1: Planning decisions contribute to well-functioning urban environments, which are
urban environments that, as a minimum:
have or enable a variety of homes that:
(i) meet the needs, in terms of type, price, and location, of different
households; and
(ii) enable Māori to express their cultural traditions and norms; and
10 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020have or enable a variety of sites that are suitable for different business sectors
in terms of location and site size; and
have good accessibility for all people between housing, jobs, community
services, natural spaces, and open spaces, including by way of public or active
transport; and
support, and limit as much as possible adverse impacts on, the competitive
operation of land and development markets; and
support reductions in greenhouse gas emissions; and
are resilient to the likely current and future effects of climate change.
Policy 2: Tier 1, 2, and 3 local authorities, at all times, provide at least sufficient development
capacity to meet expected demand for housing and for business land over the short term,
medium term, and long term.
Policy 3: In relation to tier 1 urban environments, regional policy statements and district
plans enable:
in city centre zones, building heights and density of urban form to realise as much
development capacity as possible, to maximise benefits of intensification; and
in metropolitan centre zones, building heights and density of urban form to reflect
demand for housing and business use in those locations, and in all cases building
heights of at least 6 storeys; and
building heights of least 6 storeys within at least a walkable catchment of the
following:
(i) existing and planned rapid transit stops
(ii) the edge of city centre zones
(iii) the edge of metropolitan centre zones; and
in all other locations in the tier 1 urban environment, building heights and density
of urban form commensurate with the greater of:
(i) the level of accessibility by existing or planned active or public transport to
a range of commercial activities and community services; or
(ii) relative demand for housing and business use in that location.
Policy 4: Regional policy statements and district plans applying to tier 1 urban environments
modify the relevant building height or density requirements under Policy 3 only to the extent
necessary (as specified in subpart 6) to accommodate a qualifying matter in that area.
Policy 5: Regional policy statements and district plans applying to tier 2 and 3 urban
environments enable heights and density of urban form commensurate with the greater of:
the level of accessibility by existing or planned active or public transport to a
range of commercial activities and community services; or
relative demand for housing and business use in that location.
Policy 6: When making planning decisions that affect urban environments, decision-makers
have particular regard to the following matters:
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 11the planned urban built form anticipated by those RMA planning documents that
have given effect to this National Policy Statement
that the planned urban built form in those RMA planning documents may involve
significant changes to an area, and those changes:
(i) may detract from amenity values appreciated by some people but improve
amenity values appreciated by other people, communities, and future
generations, including by providing increased and varied housing densities
and types; and
(ii) are not, of themselves, an adverse effect
the benefits of urban development that are consistent with well-functioning
urban environments (as described in Policy 1)
any relevant contribution that will be made to meeting the requirements of this
National Policy Statement to provide or realise development capacity
the likely current and future effects of climate change.
Policy 7: Tier 1 and 2 local authorities set housing bottom lines for the short-medium term and
the long term in their regional policy statements and district plans.
Policy 8: Local authority decisions affecting urban environments are responsive to plan
changes that would add significantly to development capacity and contribute to well-
functioning urban environments, even if the development capacity is:
unanticipated by RMA planning documents; or
out-of-sequence with planned land release.
Policy 9: Local authorities, in taking account of the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi
(Te Tiriti o Waitangi) in relation to urban environments, must:
involve hapū and iwi in the preparation of RMA planning documents and any
FDSs by undertaking effective consultation that is early, meaningful and, as far
as practicable, in accordance with tikanga Māori; and
when preparing RMA planning documents and FDSs, take into account the
values and aspirations of hapū and iwi for urban development; and
provide opportunities in appropriate circumstances for Māori involvement in
decision-making on resource consents, designations, heritage orders, and water
conservation orders, including in relation to sites of significance to Māori and
issues of cultural significance; and
operate in a way that is consistent with iwi participation legislation.
Policy 10: Tier 1, 2, and 3 local authorities:
that share jurisdiction over urban environments work together when
implementing this National Policy Statement; and
engage with providers of development infrastructure and additional infrastructure
to achieve integrated land use and infrastructure planning; and
engage with the development sector to identify significant opportunities for
urban development.
12 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020Policy 11: In relation to car parking:
the district plans of tier 1, 2, and 3 territorial authorities do not set minimum
car parking rate requirements, other than for accessible car parks; and
tier 1, 2, and 3 local authorities are strongly encouraged to manage effects
associated with the supply and demand of car parking through comprehensive
parking management plans.
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 13Part 3: Implementation
3.1 Outline of part
This part sets out a non-exhaustive list of things that local authorities must do to give
effect to the objectives and policies of this National Policy Statement, but nothing in
this part limits the general obligation under the Act to give effect to those objectives
and policies.
Subpart 1 – Providing development capacity
3.2 Sufficient development capacity for housing
Every tier 1, 2, and 3 local authority must provide at least sufficient development
capacity in its region or district to meet expected demand for housing:
in existing and new urban areas; and
for both standalone dwellings and attached dwellings; and
in the short term, medium term, and long term.
In order to be sufficient to meet expected demand for housing, the development
capacity must be:
plan-enabled (see clause 3.4(1)); and
infrastructure-ready (see clause 3.4(3)); and
feasible and reasonably expected to be realised (see clause 3.26); and
for tier 1 and 2 local authorities only, meet the expected demand plus the
appropriate competitiveness margin (see clause 3.22).
3.3 Sufficient development capacity for business land
Every tier 1, 2, and 3 local authority must provide at least sufficient development
capacity in its region or district to meet the expected demand for business land:
from different business sectors; and
in the short term, medium term, and long term.
In order to be sufficient to meet expected demand for business land, the development
capacity provided must be:
plan-enabled (see clause 3.4(1)); and
infrastructure-ready (see clause 3.4(3)); and
suitable (as described in clause 3.29(2)) to meet the demands of different
business sectors (as described in clause 3.28(3)); and
for tier 1 and 2 local authorities only, meet the expected demand plus the
appropriate competitiveness margin (see clause 3.22).
14 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 20203.4 Meaning of plan-enabled and infrastructure-ready
Development capacity is plan-enabled for housing or for business land if:
in relation to the short term, it is on land that is zoned for housing or for business
use (as applicable) in an operative district plan
in relation to the medium term, either paragraph (a) applies, or it is on land that is
zoned for housing or for business use (as applicable) in a proposed district plan
in relation to the long term, either paragraph (b) applies, or it is on land identified
by the local authority for future urban use or urban intensification in an FDS or,
if the local authority is not required to have an FDS, any other relevant plan
or strategy.
For the purpose of subclause (1), land is zoned for housing or for business use (as
applicable) only if the housing or business use is a permitted, controlled, or restricted
discretionary activity on that land.
Development capacity is infrastructure-ready if:
in relation to the short term, there is adequate existing development
infrastructure to support the development of the land
in relation to the medium term, either paragraph (a) applies, or funding for
adequate infrastructure to support development of the land is identified in
a long-term plan
in relation to the long term, either paragraph (b) applies, or the development
infrastructure to support the development capacity is identified in the local
authority’s infrastructure strategy (as required as part of its long-term plan).
3.5 Availability of additional infrastructure
Local authorities must be satisfied that the additional infrastructure to service the
development capacity is likely to be available.
3.6 Housing bottom lines for tier 1 and 2 urban environments
The purpose of the housing bottom lines required by this clause is to clearly state the
amount of development capacity that is sufficient to meet expected housing demand
plus the appropriate competitiveness margin in the region and each constituent district
of a tier 1 or tier 2 urban environment.
For each tier 1 or tier 2 urban environment, as soon as practicable after an HBA is made
publicly available (see clause 3.19(1)):
the relevant regional council must insert into its regional policy statement:
(i) a housing bottom line for the short-medium term; and
(ii) a housing bottom line for the long term; and
every relevant territorial authority must insert into its district plan:
(i) a housing bottom line for the short-medium term that is the proportion
of the housing bottom line for the short-medium term (as set out in the
relevant regional policy statement) that is attributable to the district
of the territorial authority; and
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 15(ii) a housing bottom line for the long term that is the proportion of the
housing bottom line for the long term (as set out in the relevant
regional policy statement) that is attributable to the district of the
territorial authority.
The housing bottom lines must be based on information in the most recent publicly
available HBA for the urban environment and are:
for the short-medium term, the sum of:
(i) the amount of feasible, reasonably expected to be realised development
capacity that must be enabled to meet demand, along with the
competitiveness margin, for the short term; and
(ii) the amount of feasible, reasonably expected to be realised development
capacity that must enabled to meet demand, along with the
competitiveness margin, for the medium term; and
for the long term, the amount of feasible, reasonably expected to be realised
development capacity that must enabled to meet demand, along with the
competitiveness margin, for the long term.
The insertion of bottom lines must be done without using a process in Schedule 1 of the
Act, but any changes to RMA planning documents required to give effect to the bottom
lines must be made using a Schedule 1 process.
3.7 When there is insufficient development capacity
If a local authority determines that there is insufficient development capacity
(as described in clauses 3.2 and 3.3) over the short term, medium term, or long
term, it must:
immediately notify the Minister for the Environment; and
if the insufficiency is wholly or partly a result of RMA planning documents, change
those documents to increase development capacity for housing or business land
(as applicable) as soon as practicable, and update any other relevant plan or
strategy (including any FDS, as required by subpart 4); and
consider other options for:
(i) increasing development capacity; and
(ii) otherwise enabling development.
Subpart 2 – Responsive planning
3.8 Unanticipated or out-of-sequence developments
This clause applies to a plan change that provides significant development capacity that
is not otherwise enabled in a plan or is not in sequence with planned land release.
Every local authority must have particular regard to the development capacity provided
by the plan change if that development capacity:
would contribute to a well-functioning urban environment; and
is well-connected along transport corridors; and
meets the criteria set under subclause (3); and
16 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020Every regional council must include criteria in its regional policy statement for
determining what plan changes will be treated, for the purpose of implementing
Policy 8, as adding significantly to development capacity.
Subpart 3 – Evidence-based decision-making
3.9 Monitoring requirements
Every tier 1, 2, and 3 local authority must monitor, quarterly, the following in relation to
each urban environment in their region or district:
the demand for dwellings
the supply of dwellings
prices of, and rents for, dwellings
housing affordability
the proportion of housing development capacity that has been realised:
(i) in previously urbanised areas (such as through infill housing or
redevelopment); and
(ii) in previously undeveloped (ie, greenfield) areas
available data on business land.
In relation to tier 1 urban environments, tier 1 local authorities must monitor the
proportion of development capacity that has been realised in each zone identified
in clause 3.37(1) (ie, each zone with development outcomes that are monitored).
Every tier 1, 2, and 3 local authority must publish the results of its monitoring at
least annually.
The monitoring required by this clause must relate to the relevant urban environments,
but may apply more widely (such as, for example, where the relevant data is available
only on a region or district-wide basis).
If more than one tier 1 or tier 2 local authority has jurisdiction over a tier 1 or tier 2
urban environment, those local authorities are jointly responsible for doing the
monitoring required by this subpart.
3.10 Assessing demand and development capacity
Every local authority must assess the demand for housing and for business land in
urban environments, and the development capacity that is sufficient (as described
in clauses 3.2 and 3.3) to meet that demand in its region or district in the short term,
medium term, and long term.
Tier 1 and tier 2 local authorities comply with subclause (1) in relation to tier 1 and
tier 2 urban environments by preparing and publishing an HBA as required by subpart 5.
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 173.11 Using evidence and analysis
When making plans, or when changing plans in ways that affect the development
of urban environments, local authorities must:
clearly identify the resource management issues being managed; and
use evidence, particularly any relevant HBAs, about land and development
markets, and the results of the monitoring required by this National Policy
Statement, to assess the impact of different regulatory and non-regulatory
options for urban development and their contribution to:
(i) achieving well-functioning urban environments; and
(ii) meeting the requirements to provide at least sufficient development
capacity.
Local authorities must include the matters referred to in subclause (1)(a) and (b) in
relevant evaluation reports and further evaluation reports prepared under sections 32
and 32AA of the Act.
Subpart 4 – Future Development Strategy (FDS)
3.12 Preparation of FDS
Every tier 1 and tier 2 local authority must prepare, and must make publicly available
as required under the Local Government Act 2002, an FDS for the tier 1 or 2 urban
environment:
every 6 years; and
in time to inform, or at the same time as, preparation of the next long-term plan
of each relevant local authority.
The FDS must apply, at a minimum, to the relevant tier 1 and 2 urban environments
of the local authority, but may apply to any wider area.
If more than one tier 1 or tier 2 local authority has jurisdiction over a tier 1 or tier 2
urban environment, those local authorities are jointly responsible for preparing an
FDS as required by this subpart.
If a local authority that is not a tier 1 or 2 local authority chooses to prepare an FDS,
either alone or with any other local authority, this subpart applies as if it were a tier 1 or
2 local authority, except that any reference to an HBA may be read as a reference to any
other document that contains broadly equivalent information.
An FDS may be prepared and published as a stand-alone document, or be treated as
part of any other document (such as a spatial plan).
3.13 Purpose and content of FDS
The purpose of an FDS is:
to promote long-term strategic planning by setting out how a local authority
intends to:
18 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020(i) achieve well-functioning urban environments in its existing and future
urban areas; and
(ii) provide at least sufficient development capacity, as required by clauses 3.2
and 3.3, over the next 30 years to meet expected demand; and
assist the integration of planning decisions under the Act with infrastructure
planning and funding decisions.
Every FDS must spatially identify:
the broad locations in which development capacity will be provided over the long
term, in both existing and future urban areas, to meet the requirements of clauses
3.2 and 3.3; and
the development infrastructure and additional infrastructure required to support
or service that development capacity, along with the general location of the
corridors and other sites required to provide it; and
any constraints on development.
Every FDS must include a clear statement of hapū and iwi values and aspirations for
urban development.
3.14 What FDSs are informed by
Every FDS must be informed by the following:
the most recent applicable HBA
a consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of different spatial scenarios
for achieving the purpose of the FDS
the relevant long-term plan and its infrastructure strategy, and any other relevant
strategies and plans
Māori, and in particular tangata whenua, values and aspirations for urban
development
feedback received through the consultation and engagement required by
clause 3.15
every other National Policy Statement under the Act, including the New Zealand
Coastal Policy Statement
any other relevant national policy required by, or issued under, legislation.
3.15 Consultation and engagement
When preparing or updating an FDS local authorities must use the special consultative
procedure in section 83 of the Local Government Act 2002.
In order to prepare the draft required by that procedure, local authorities must engage
with the following:
other local authorities with whom there are significant connections relating to
infrastructure or community
relevant central government agencies
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 19relevant hapū and iwi
providers of additional infrastructure
relevant providers of nationally significant infrastructure
the development sector (to identify significant future development opportunities
and infrastructure requirements).
3.16 Review of FDS
Every tier 1 and tier 2 local authority must regularly review its FDS to determine whether
it needs updating, and the review must be done in time to inform the next long-term
plan (ie, every 3 years).
The review must:
engage with the development sector and landowners to identify significant future
development opportunities and associated infrastructure requirements; and
consider the most recent HBA.
If, following the review, the local authority decides that the FDS does not need updating,
that decision and the reasons for it must be publicly notified.
If, following the review, the local authority decides that the FDS is to be updated, the
local authority must follow the same processes for consultation as apply to the
preparation of an FDS, but only in relation to the aspects proposed to be updated.
3.17 Effect of FDS
Every tier 1 and tier 2 local authority:
must have regard to the relevant FDS when preparing or changing RMA planning
documents; and
is strongly encouraged to use the relevant FDS to inform:
(i) long-term plans, and particularly infrastructure strategies; and
(ii) regional land transport plans prepared by a local authority under Part 2
of the Land Transport Management Act 2003; and
(iii) any other relevant strategies and plans.
3.18 FDS implementation plan
Every tier 1 and tier 2 local authority must prepare and implement an implementation
plan for its FDS.
If a tier 1 or tier 2 local authority consists of more than one local authority, the
implementation plan must be prepared as a single document by all the local
authorities that jointly prepared the FDS.
Every implementation plan, or part of an implementation plan, must be
updated annually.
20 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020An implementation plan or part of an implementation plan:
is not part of the FDS to which it relates; and
does not need to be prepared using the consultation and engagement
requirements set out in clause 3.15; and
does not have the effect of an FDS as described in clause 3.17.
Subpart 5 – Housing and Business Development
Capacity Assessment (HBA)
3.19 Obligation to prepare HBA
Every tier 1 and tier 2 local authority must prepare, and must make publicly available
as required under the Local Government Act 2002, an HBA for its tier 1 or tier 2
urban environments every 3 years, in time to inform the relevant authority’s next
long-term plan.
The HBA must apply, at a minimum, to the relevant tier 1 or tier 2 urban environments
of the local authority (ie, must assess demand and capacity within the boundaries of
those urban environments), but may apply to any wider area.
If more than one tier 1 or tier 2 local authority has jurisdiction over a tier 1 or tier 2
urban environment, those local authorities are jointly responsible for preparing an
HBA as required by this subpart.
3.20 Purpose of HBA
The purpose of an HBA is to:
provide information on the demand and supply of housing and of business land
in the relevant tier 1 or tier 2 urban environment, and the impact of planning
and infrastructure decisions of the relevant local authorities on that demand
and supply; and
inform RMA planning documents, FDSs, and long-term plans; and
quantify the development capacity that is sufficient to meet expected demand
for housing and for business land in the short term, medium term, and long term.
3.21 Involving development sector and others
In preparing an HBA, every tier 1 and tier 2 local authority must seek information and
comment from:
expert or experienced people in the development sector; and
providers of development infrastructure and additional infrastructure; and
anyone else who has information that may materially affect the calculation of the
development capacity.
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 213.22 Competitiveness margin
A competitiveness margin is a margin of development capacity, over and above the
expected demand that tier 1 and tier 2 local authorities are required to provide, that
is required in order to support choice and competitiveness in housing and business
land markets.
The competitiveness margins for both housing and business land are:
for the short term, 20%
for the medium term, 20%
for the long term, 15%.
Housing
3.23 Analysis of housing market and impact of planning
Every HBA must include analysis of how the relevant local authority’s planning decisions
and provision of infrastructure affects the affordability and competitiveness of the local
housing market.
The analysis must include an assessment of how well the current and likely future
demands for housing by Māori and different groups in the community (such as older
people, renters, homeowners, low-income households, visitors, and seasonal workers)
are met, including the demand for different types and forms of housing (such as for
lower-cost housing, papakāinga, and seasonal worker or student accommodation).
The analysis must be informed by:
market indicators, including:
(i) indicators of housing affordability, housing demand, and housing supply;
and
(ii) information about household incomes, housing prices, and rents; and
price efficiency indicators.
3.24 Housing demand assessment
Every HBA must estimate, for the short term, medium term, and long term, the demand
for additional housing in the region and each constituent district of the tier 1 or tier 2
urban environment:
in different locations; and
in terms of dwelling types.
Local authorities may identify locations in any way they choose.
Local authorities may identify the types of dwellings in any way they chose but must,
at a minimum, distinguish between standalone dwellings and attached dwellings.
The demand for housing must be expressed in terms of numbers of dwellings.
22 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020Every HBA must:
set out a range of projections of demand for housing in the short term, medium
term, and long term; and
identify which of the projections are the most likely in each of the short term,
medium term, and long term; and
set out the assumptions underpinning the different projections and the reason for
selecting the most likely; and
if those assumptions involve a high level of uncertainty, the nature and potential
effects of that uncertainty.
3.25 Housing development capacity assessment
Every HBA must quantify, for the short term, medium term, and long term, the housing
development capacity for housing in the region and each constituent district of the tier 1
or tier 2 urban environment that is:
plan-enabled; and
plan-enabled and infrastructure-ready; and
plan-enabled, infrastructure-ready, and feasible and reasonably expected to
be realised.
The development capacity must be quantified as numbers of dwellings:
in different locations, including in existing and new urban areas; and
of different types, including standalone dwellings and attached dwellings.
3.26 Estimating what is feasible and reasonably expected to
be realised
For the purpose of estimating the amount of development capacity that is reasonably
expected to be realised, or that is both feasible and reasonably expected to be realised,
local authorities:
may use any appropriate method; but
must outline and justify the methods, inputs, and assumptions used to arrive at
the estimates.
The following are examples of the kind of methods that a tier 1 local authority could use
to assess the amount of development capacity that is feasible and reasonably expected
to be realised:
separately estimate the number of feasible dwellings (using a feasibility model)
and the number of dwellings that can reasonably be expected to be realised
(using building consents data on the number of sites and extent of allowed
capacity that has been previously developed), for the short, medium and long
term; compare the numbers of dwellings estimated by each method; then pick
the lower of the numbers in each time period, to represent the amount of
development capacity that is feasible and reasonably expected to be realised
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 23estimate the number of feasible dwellings or sites, and then assess the proportion
of these that can reasonably be expected to be developed in the short, medium
and long term, using information about landowner and developer intentions
integrate information about past development trends and future landowner and
developer intentions into the feasibility model, which could mean modifying
assumptions about densities, heights, and timing of development.
The following is an example of the kind of methods that a tier 2 local authority could use
to assess the amount of development capacity that is feasible and reasonably expected
to be realised:
assess the number of dwellings that can reasonably be expected to be developed
(using building consents data on the number of sites and extent of allowed
capacity that has been developed previously), for the short, medium and
long term; and
then seek advice from the development sector about what factors affect the
feasibility of development.
Different methods may be appropriate when assessing the development capacity that
is reasonably expected to be realised in different circumstances, such as:
in existing, as opposed to new, urban areas; and
for stand-alone, as opposed to attached, dwellings.
3.27 Assessment of sufficient development capacity for housing
Every HBA must clearly identify, for the short term, medium term, and long term, where
there is sufficient development capacity to meet demand for housing in the region and
each constituent district of the tier 1 or tier 2 urban environment.
The requirements of subclause (1) must be based on a comparison of:
the demand for housing referred to in clause 3.24 plus the appropriate
competitiveness margin; and
the development capacity identified under clause 3.25.
If there is any insufficiency, the HBA must identify where and when this will occur
and analyse the extent to which RMA planning documents, a lack of development
infrastructure, or both, cause or contribute to the insufficiency.
Business land
3.28 Business land demand assessment
Every HBA must estimate, for the short term, medium term, and long term, the
demand from each business sector for additional business land in the region and
each constituent district of the tier 1 or tier 2 urban environment.
The demand must be expressed in hectares or floor areas.
24 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020For the purpose of this clause, a local authority may identify business sectors in any way
it chooses but must, as a minimum, distinguish between sectors that would use land
zoned for commercial, retail, or industrial uses.
The HBA for a tier 1 urban environment must:
set out a range of projections of demand for business land by business sector,
for the short term, medium term, and long term; and
identify which of the projections is the most likely in each of the short term,
medium term, and long term; and
set out the assumptions underpinning the different projections and the reason
for selecting which is the most likely; and
if those assumptions involve a high level of uncertainty, the nature and potential
effects of that uncertainty.
The HBA for a tier 2 urban environment must:
set out the most likely projection of demand for business land by business sector
in the short term, medium term, and long term; and
set out the assumptions underpinning that projection; and
if those assumptions involve a high level of uncertainty, the nature and potential
effects of that uncertainty.
3.29 Business land development capacity assessment
Every HBA must estimate the following, for the short term, medium term, and
long term, for the region and each constituent district of the tier 1 or tier 2 urban
environment:
the development capacity (in terms of hectares or floor areas) to meet expected
demand for business land for each business sector, plus the appropriate
competitiveness margin; and
of that development capacity, the development capacity that is:
(i) plan-enabled; and
(ii) plan-enabled and infrastructure-ready; and
(iii) plan-enabled, infrastructure-ready, and suitable for each business sector.
A local authority may define what it means for development capacity to be “suitable”
in any way it chooses, but suitability must, at a minimum, include suitability in terms
of location and site size.
3.30 Assessment of sufficient development capacity for business land
Every HBA must clearly identify, for the short term, medium term, and long term,
whether there is sufficient development capacity to meet demand for business land
in the region and each constituent district of the tier 1 or tier 2 urban environment.
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 25The requirements of subclause (1) must be based on a comparison of:
the demand for business land referred to in clause 3.28 plus the appropriate
competitiveness margin; and
the development capacity identified under clause 3.29.
If there is any insufficiency, the HBA must identify where and when this will occur
and analyse the extent to which RMA planning documents, a lack of development
infrastructure, or both, cause or contribute to the insufficiency.
Subpart 6 – Intensification in tier 1 urban environments
3.31 Tier 1 territorial authorities implementing intensification policies
Every tier 1 territorial authority must identify, by location, the building heights and
densities required by Policy 3.
If the territorial authority considers that it is necessary to modify the building height
or densities in order to provide for a qualifying matter (as permitted under Policy 4),
it must:
identify, by location, where the qualifying matter applies; and
specify the alternate building heights and densities proposed for those areas.
The territorial authority must make the information required by subclauses (1) and (2)
publicly available at the same time as it notifies any plan change or proposed plan
change to give effect to Policy 3.
3.32 Qualifying matters
In this National Policy Statement, qualifying matter means any of the following:
a matter of national importance that decision-makers are required to recognise
and provide for under section 6 of the Act
a matter required in order to give effect to any other National Policy Statement
any matter required for the purpose of ensuring the safe or efficient operation of
nationally significant infrastructure
open space provided for public use, but only in relation to the land that is open
space
an area subject to a designation or heritage order, but only in relation to the land
that is subject to the designation or heritage order
a matter necessary to implement, or ensure consistency with, iwi participation
legislation
the requirement to provide sufficient business land suitable for low density uses
to meet expected demand under this National Policy Statement
any other matter that makes high density development as directed by Policy 3
inappropriate in an area, but only if the requirements of clause 3.33(3) are met.
26 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 20203.33 Requirements if qualifying matter applies
This clause applies if a territorial authority is amending its district plan and intends to
rely on Policy 4 to justify a modification to the direction in Policy 3 in relation to
a specific area.
The evaluation report prepared under section 32 of the Act in relation to the proposed
amendment must
demonstrate why the territorial authority considers that:
(i) the area is subject to a qualifying matter; and
(ii) the qualifying matter is incompatible with the level of development
directed by Policy 3 for that area; and
assess the impact that limiting development capacity, building height or density
(as relevant) will have on the provision of development capacity; and
assess the costs and broader impacts of imposing those limits.
A matter is not a qualifying matter under clause 3.32(1)(h) in relation to an area unless
the evaluation report also:
identifies the specific characteristic that makes the level of development directed
by Policy 3 inappropriate in the area, and justifies why that is inappropriate in
light of the national significance of urban development and the objectives of this
National Policy Statement; and
includes a site-specific analysis that:
(i) identifies the site to which the matter relates; and
(ii) evaluates the specific characteristics on a site-specific basis to determine
the spatial extent where intensification needs to be compatible with the
specific matter; and
(iii) evaluates an appropriate range of options to achieve the greatest heights
and densities directed by Policy 3, while managing the specific
characteristics.
3.34 Effects on consideration of resource consents
Nothing in Policies 3 or 4 or this subpart precludes the consideration (under section 104
of the Act) of any actual or potential effects on the environment associated with
building heights.
Subpart 7 – Development outcomes for zones
3.35 Development outcomes for zones
Every tier 1, 2 or 3 territorial authority must ensure that:
the objectives for every zone in an urban environment in its district describe
the development outcomes intended for the zone over the life of the plan and
beyond; and
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 27the policies and rules in its district plan are individually and cumulatively
consistent with the development outcomes described in the objectives
for each zone.
3.36 Development outcomes consistent with intensification policies
Every tier 1 territorial authority must ensure that the development outcomes for zones
in its tier 1 urban environments are consistent with the outcomes required by Policy 3.
3.37 Monitoring development outcomes
Every tier 1 territorial authority must monitor the extent to which development is
occurring in each of the following zones as anticipated by the development outcomes
included in the objectives for the zone:
city centre zones
metropolitan centre zones
town centre zones
mixed use zones
high density residential zones
medium density residential zones
general residential zones.
If monitoring under this clause indicates that development outcomes are not being
realised, the territorial authority must, as soon as practicable:
undertake an assessment to identify whether provisions of the district plan
(individually and cumulatively), or any other factors (and if so, what factors),
or both, are contributing to the failure to realise development outcomes; and
give public notice (as defined in the Act) of the results of the assessment.
If the assessment indicates that provisions of a district plan are contributing to the
failure to realise development outcomes, the territorial authority must change its
district plan to address the deficiency.
If the assessment indicates that other factors are contributing to the failure to realise
development outcomes, the territorial authority must consider alternative methods to
improve the rate of realisation (such as the use of incentives for site amalgamation).
Any plan change required under subclause (3) must be notified as soon as practicable,
and no later than 12 months after the assessment is publicly notified.
Subpart 8 – Car parking
3.38 Car parking
If the district plan of a tier 1, 2, or 3 territorial authority contains objectives, policies,
rules, or assessment criteria that have the effect of requiring a minimum number of car
parks to be provided for a particular development, land use, or activity, the territorial
authority must change its district plan to remove that effect, other than in respect of
accessible car parks.
28 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020Territorial authorities must make any changes required by subclause (1) without using
a process in Schedule 1 of the Act.
Nothing in this National Policy Statement prevents a district plan including objectives.
policies, rules, or assessment criteria:
requiring a minimum number of accessible car parks to be provided for any
activity; or
relating to parking dimensions or manoeuvring standards to apply if:
(i) a developer chooses to supply car parks; or
(ii) when accessible car parks are required.
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 29Part 4: Timing
4.1 Timeframes for implementation
Every tier 1, 2, and 3 local authority must amend its regional policy statement or
district plan to give effect to the provisions of this National Policy Statement as soon
as practicable
In addition, local authorities must comply with specific policies of this National Policy
Statement in accordance with the following table:
National Policy Statement
Local authority Subject provisions By when
Tier 1 only Intensification Policies 3 and 4 (see Part 3 Not later than 2 years after
subpart 6) commencement date
Tier 2 only Intensification Policy 5 Not later than 2 years after
commencement date
Tiers 1 and 2 First FDS made publicly Policy 2 (see Part 3 subpart 4) In time to inform the 2024
available after long-term plan
commencement date
Tiers 1 and 2 HBA so far as it relates to Policy 2 (see Part 3 subpart 5) By 31 July 2021
housing
Tiers 1 and 2 HBA relating to both Policy 2 (see Part 3 subpart 5) In time to inform the 2024
housing and business land long-term plan
Tiers 1, 2, and 3 Car parking Policy 11(a) (see clause 3.38) Not later than 18 months
after commencement date
30 National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020Appendix: Tier 1 and tier 2 urban
environments and local authorities
Table 1
Tier 1 urban environment Tier 1 local authorities
Auckland Auckland Council
Hamilton Waikato Regional Council, Hamilton City Council, Waikato District Council,
Waipā District Council
Tauranga Bay of Plenty Regional Council, Tauranga City Council, Western Bay of Plenty
District Council
Wellington Wellington Regional Council, Wellington City Council, Porirua City Council,
Hutt City Council, Upper Hutt City Council, Kāpiti Coast District Council
Christchurch Canterbury Regional Council, Christchurch City Council, Selwyn District Council
Waimakariri District Council
Table 2
Tier 2 urban environment Tier 2 local authorities
Whangārei Northland Regional Council, Whangarei District Council
Rotorua Bay of Plenty Regional Council, Rotorua District Council
New Plymouth Taranaki Regional Council, New Plymouth District Council
Napier Hastings Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, Napier City Council, Hastings District Council
Palmerston North Manawatū-Whanganui Regional Council, Palmerston North City Council
Nelson Tasman Nelson City Council, Tasman District Council
Queenstown Otago Regional Council, Queenstown Lakes District Council
Dunedin Otago Regional Council, Dunedin City Council
National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 31You can also read
