Modelli predittivi di tossicità dopo RT esterna nel distretto pelvico - C. Fiorino Medical Physics San Raffaele Institute, Milano, Italy
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Modelli predittivi di tossicità dopo RT esterna nel distretto pelvico C. Fiorino Medical Physics San Raffaele Institute, Milano, Italy Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive modeling & plan optimization: the case of prostate cancer Ex: first phase (pelvic nodes + P+SV bed), post-op pts SIB: 60/52.5 Gy in 30 fr Follow boost up to 70-74 Gy Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive modeling & plan optimization: the case of prostate cancer Manual & automatic planning depend on our knowledge (ignorance) of dose-volume effects !...and local skills The case of knowledge-based machine learning systems Courtesy: R Castriconi Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive modeling & plan optimization: the case of prostate cancer KB model estimating DVHs based on anatomy Translating into an automatic plan optimization tool, stressing the system toward the best solution within the expected range Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive modeling & plan optimization: the case of prostate cancer The amplitudes of the confidence intervals partly reflect Seminario SSFM inter-planner variability and, indirectly, our lack of Milano, 31 Maggio 2018 knowledge of dose-volume effect !
Predictive modeling & plan optimization: Always (!), plan quality will improve primarily when more refined, reliable, validated models of dose-volume effects (and of the combined impact of other clinical, biological, omics parameters) are available (!) But, …. you must be skilled to obtain optimal plans in your clinic (!) Ex: HN cancer planners vs auto a) too rough constraint to contro-lateral parotid (Dmean
Modelling normal tissues response starting from clinical data: a quite long (and partly successful !) story…. Seminario SSFM Lyman (1985) Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Modelling normal tissues response starting from clinical data: a quite long (and partly successful !) story…. Quantitative (organ-based) relationships: a revolution in clinical RT in the ’90s and ‘00s «NTCP models» through DVH reduction (LKB, gEUD….) Impact of fractionation (LQ-based and updates…) Milestones of Emami/Burman paper (1991) and QUANTEC Supplement (2010) n Vwhole 1/ n EUD= ∑ vi * (Di ) Veff i Dmax 0 (serial, EUD≈Dmax) EUD n ≈ volume effect 1 (parallel, EUD≈Dmean) Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive models of toxicity in RT: a rapidly growing and evolving field Development of (validated) predictive models: one of the 4 major strategic topics of research for RT in the next years !!!! Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive models of toxicity in RT: a rapidly growing and evolving field Development of (validated) predictive models: one of the 4 major strategic topics of research for RT in the next years !!!! Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
The «Emami-Burman & Quantec-like organ based» approach to NTCP modelling: a still vital dogma…… QUANTEC:Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in Clinic (steering Comm: 3 Radiation Oncologists, 5 Medical Physicists) Organs as «independent and homogeneous entities» is a robust and practically usable approximation for most end-points …an intuitive and natural way to describe radiotherapy-induced effects Supported the translation from «qualitative» to «quantitative» RT ….knowledge condensed into organ constraints/EUDs/NTCPs Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Summary Post-Quantec update (2010-2017) for the “main” organs: o Rectum o Bladder a b o Bowel . . c . o (Validation issues) Not considered in the lecture: Limited advancement in quantitative dose-volume relationships for pelvic bone marrow (hematological tox, models including DVHs and clinical predictors w/wout Chemo) and penile bulb (erectile dysfunction) Little/no advancement & large interest: Male gonads (fertility, libido, testosterone levels…), female sexual organs (vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, decline sexual life, …) Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Summary Post-Quantec update (2010-2017) for the “main” organs: o Rectum o Bladder o Bowel Physica Medica (EJMP), Landoni et al. 32: 521- Validation o532, issues of the period 2009-2016) 2016 (update Not considered in the lecture: Limited advancement in quantitative dose-volume relationships for pelvic bone marrow (hematological tox, models including DVHs and clinical predictors w/wout Chemo) and penile bulb (erectile dysfunction) Little/no advancement & large interest: Male gonads (fertility, libido, testosterone levels…), female sexual organs (vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, decline sexual life, …) Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Rectum: late bleeding o Confirmation of the prevalently serial behaviour (grade 2, grade 3) o Evidence of relevant clinical co-factors: abdominal surgery, cardio-vascular diseases (age, anti-coagulants, androgen deprivation) o Acute GI toxicity (consequential component) n-values: 0.03-0.18 Quantec: 0.09 Seminario SSFM Landoni et al: «Predicting toxicity in RT for prostate cancer», 2016 Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Rectum: late bleeding o Confirmation of the prevalently serial behaviour (grade 2, grade 3) o Evidence of relevant clinical co-factors: abdominal surgery, cardio- vascular diseases (age, anti-coagulants [protective], androgen deprivation) o Acute GI toxicity (consequential component) Rancati 2011 Dose modifying factor (NTCP models) ≈ 7-10% OR (Logistic MV models) ≈ 2-3 De Fraene 2012 Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Rectum: late incontinence o Confirmation of a prevalently parallel behaviour (n=1) Seminario SSFM Landoni et al: «Predicting toxicity in RT for prostate cancer» 2016 Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Rectum: late incontinence o Confirmation of a prevalently parallel behaviour (n=1) o Evidence of relevant clinical co-factors: abdominal surgery, colon disease, age, baseline status… likely more relevant than dose/volume-effect o Evidence of spatial effects (anal canal): Pelvic floor muscles as OARs? Smenk 2012 o Noise due to events not due to RT (better prediction for persistent/chronic symptoms vs peak events) Fiorino 2012 Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Rectum: spatial effects o News regarding spatial dose effects (Sub volume and/or Pixel/Voxel wise Analyses: Buettner 2011,2012, Acosta 2013, 2017 Hamstra 2014, Wortel 2015, Drean 2016…) Oniukka et al. Submitted (AIROPROS0102 data) Seminario SSFM Late incontinence, anal Late bleeding, rectum Milano, 31 Maggio 2018 canal dose maps dose maps
Bladder: poor data/models up to 2010 o Lack of quantitative dose-volume relationships for GU tox, reported by three Reviews (Fiorino R&O 2009, Viswanathan IJROBP 2010, Budaus Eur Urol 2012) o Whole bladder irradiation: ≈55Gy threshold for late Grade 3 RTOG tox Viswanathan 2010 o Why ? Clinical factors influence the outcome (need of prospective data, baseline situation), different symptoms = different relationships (need of careful scoring, possibly patient-reported). Severe events relatively rare & no plateau with time = need of large numbers and long time o Why ? Variable filling concerns (Impact on DVH). Hollow organ (need to assess correlation between DVH of bladder/surface and wall).; what target ? (urethra, bladder wall, specific functional areas….) o Quantec conclusions: “Urgent” need of large, prospective, high- quality studies Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences o First evidence of dose-volume effects for selected end-points; evidence of sensitive sub-regions (trigone). Sensitivity to altered fractionation o Clinical predictors combined with dose-volume/surface data: baseline status, TURP, cardio- vascular diseases, hormones o Acute GU tox (consequential component) o Largely increased practice to use questionnaires to assess patient-reported scores (ex: IPSS, ICIQ) Seminario SSFM Landoni et al: «Predicting toxicity in RT for prostate cancer» 2016 Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences o First evidence of dose-volume effects for selected end-points; evidence of sensitive sub-regions (trigone). Sensitivity to altered fractionation Carillo 2014 Acute tox: relationship with Acute weekly DVH/DSH IPSS≥15 @ end RT ∆IPSS≥10 @ end RT Palorini 2016 Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….dose-maps analyses Improta 2016 Yahia 2016 o Acute ∆IPSS ≥ 10 o Mostly moderate late tox: - “some” volume effect for acute ∆IPSS ≥ 10 and moderate late dysuria, haematuria and ∆IPSS ≥ 10 (cranial & lateral extension) Seminario SSFM - Dose effect prevalent for late incontinence Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….trigone dose Improta 2016 Gadhiar 2014 Acute ∆IPSS ≥ 10 Late ∆IPSS ≥ 10 Acute ∆IPSS ≥ 15 o Dmean/Dmax V/S>80-90 Gy to the trigone associated with relevant increase of GU tox, (Heemsberger 2010, Ghadiar 2014, Palorini 2015, Improta 2016) - Trigone dose effect: more evident @ (Equivalent) doses > 80Gy Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….dose effect/serial behaviour o Dose effect for moderate-severe late tox: recent confirmations from DUE01 3-year late patient-reported incontinence (end-points of different severity) vs (2Gy equivalent) prescribed dose, 298 pts (best α/β=0.8Gy) Cozzarini 2017 Best NTCP fit for 3-year late «severe» patient- reported symptoms (Comprehensive end-point including ∆IPSS ≥ 10, incontinence, bleeding, stricture), 259 pts (best α/β=1Gy, best fit n-value: 0.01) Palorini: to be submitted Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences o First evidence of dose-volume effects for selected end-points; evidence of sensitive sub-regions (trigone). Sensitivity to altered fractionation o Suggestion of a higher than expected impact of moderate hypofractionation (Pollack 2013, Fiorino 2014, Sanguineti 2016, Palorini 2016) more evident in post-prostatectomy pts and high dose schedules delivered @2.5-3.0 Gy/fr, on incontinence and haematuria. Apparently very low α/β (
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences o Sensitivity to altered fractionation (post-op patients) Fitting data of 563 post-operative pts treated with conventional or hypo (3 protocols), 3-year severe incontinence (INC) and hematuria (HEM) INC D50 (Gy) K α/β (Gy) Best-fit parameter 449 5.3 0.81 TOX(%) = 100/[1 + (D50/BED)K] 95% CI* 310-587 0-49.4 0.1-4.8 BED = D x [1 + d/(α/β)] HEM D50 (Gy) K α/β (Gy) Best-fit parameter 500 5.6 0.74 95% CI* 430-570 0.9-10.3 0.0-1.8 Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences o Sensitivity to altered fractionation (post-op patients) INC D50 (Gy) K α/β (Gy) γ (Gy/day) Best-fit parameter 123 5.1 5 0.66 TOX(%) = 100/[1 + (D50/BED)K] 95% CI* 0 - 302 0-72 - 0.2 – 1.2 α/β (Gy) γ (Gy/day) BED = D x [1 + d/(α/β)] - γ x T HEM D50 (Gy) K Best-fit parameter 156 3.4 5 0.85 3y % risk HEMATURIA 14 95% CI* 0 - 465 0-25 - 0.3 – 1.3 12 N=80, 2.55Gy/fr, 71.4Gy 10 8 N=50, 2.9Gy/fr, 58Gy 6 N=117, 2.35Gy/fr, 65.8Gy 4 N=929, 1.8Gy/fr, 70.2Gy 2 0 40 50 60 70 80 BED (Gy) Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences o Clinical predictors combined with dose-volume/surface data: baseline status, TURP, cardio-vascular diseases, hormones Baseline status largely modulates dose-volume effects (and probably the impact of daily dose ?) - Cardio-vascular problems (…smoking, hypertension…), TURP well assessed with large ORs depending on end-points - Neo adjuvant hormone reported to be protective Seminario SSFM (OR≈0.25-0.5) Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….practical consequences ? o Dose effect (likely) more relevant than volume effect, >80 Gy (EQD2) o Sparing Trigone/Bladder overlapped with PTV in >80GY (EQD2) schedules ?? o Evidence of (relatively) small volume effect & trigone sensitivity consistent with positive impact of IGRT and MRI- based planning (Zelefsky 2012, Green 2013, Ali 2013) in reducing GU tox o IGRT & Motion issues ? Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….Motion issues o The case of prostate cancer: bladder base is quite stable The absolute amount of bladder receiving “high-dose” is relatively stable ! o Better with IGRT (prostate matching) Dose to Bladder base: small systematic error (IGRT vs plan) Palorini 2016 Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bowel: Quantec & controversial issues o Quantec suggestions “driven” by few published works (2003-2008) mainly referred to rectum/gyno ca pts treated with 3DCRT (+ Chemotherapy), not confirmed by the only IMRT study (Roeske 2003) o Main criticism: high correlation Between low (V10-V15) and high (V40-V50) dose in whole pelvic RT delivered with 3DCRT cc 1800,0 1600,0 Kavanagh 2010 1400,0 1200,0 1000,0 800,0 600,0 400,0 200,0 0,0 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 Gy Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bowel: news in the IMRT era o Dose-volume relationships for acute tox (mainly diarrhea) with IMRT (+/- CHT) published in the last years for pts treated with rectal, anal, gyno, bladder and prostate ca o Most studies found correlation with “high” (V30-V50) doses: Roeske (gyno) 2003 Fiorino (prostate) 2009, Perna (prostate) 2010, Chen (gyno) 2014, Mc Donald (bladder) 2013, Olsen (anal) 2017 , Sini (prostate) 2017 o Studies with 3DCRT pts found “V15” as main predictor (Fiorino 2009, Robertson 2010, Chen 2012) o Different constrainst, depending on end-point (for instance: different severity of diarrhea) and type of pts (largely influenced by the bowel overlapped with PTV !) o Impact of clinical variables: Ex: V15 vs Acute grade 2-3 GI, rectal cancer, 3DCRT Chemotherapy, Age, Previous surgery Robertson 2010 Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bowel: news in the IMRT era o Lack of prospective trials with patient-reported score o Lack of dose-volume relationships on late tox o First results from IHU prospective trial (whole-pelvis IMRT, prostate cancer) Association between bowel loops DVH and patient reported moderate/severe worsening of loose stools symptoms at half/end IMRT Suggested constraints: V42
Bowel: news in the IMRT era o Depending on the situation, hard to reduce bowel tox if delivering «highly tailored» IMRT «Background» likely to be due to clinical parameters and to the bowel overlapped with PTV o Bowel motion: challenging issue…how robust are DVHs with respect to motion ? Are there more stable regions ? Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bowel: motion issue, a study in progress o The motion of bowel is very large and unpredictable, big impact on DVH (Hysing 2008, Sanguineti 2008); lack of studies with sufficient statistics o «Probability maps estimated by daily MVCT during Tomotherapy (prostate patients) by applying a semi-automated contouring method (Perna 2016) o Data on 10 pts show that the «stable» bowel volume is small and follows «regular» patterns 80% 50% Plan Seminario SSFM o Toward the inclusion of the impact of bowel motion Milano, 31 Maggio 2018 into dose-volume relationships ?
Validation issues - Internal validation: more and more frequently performed - External (independent) validation: very rare Van der Schaaf Red J 2015 - Limits in generalizability …. - In particular: extension outside the domain of the original cohorts of pts - Need of well conducted, independent validation studies ! Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Validation issues - Acute, patient-reported Nocturia deltaIPSS >=10 Yahya 2016 Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Validation issues - Late, physician-reported Yahya 2016 Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Models: Conclusive remarks - Rectal tox : confirmation & news (….not only bleeding, specific spatial effects, ….) - GU tox: Started to appear multi-variable predictive models for specific and comprehensive end-points: relevance of clinical predictors, baseline condition, often «almost serial» behaviour - Bowel tox: some improvement but a lot to understand… - Hematological tox: more «mature» evidence of dose-volume effects - Sexual dysfunction: urgent need (!) - Additional Priorities: Patient-reported scoring; Spatial/local effects (voxel/pixel wise comparison methods); impact of motion (bowel first !); Need of independent validation studies to improve the generalizability of models ( : Compared to Quantec 2010 ) Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Thanks for your attention Thanks ! C. Cozzarini, T. Rancati, G Sanguineti, R. Valdagni, F. Bedenchini, C. Bianconi, S. Broggi, V. Carillo, R. Castriconi, G.M. Cattaneo, A. Cicchetti, I. Improta, G. Gagliardi, S. Gianolini, V. Landoni, M. Mori, A Nahum, E. Onjukka, F. Palorini, P. Passoni, L. Perna, R. Raso, C. Sini, ….. Physica Medica (EJMP), Landoni et al. 32: 521-532, 2016 Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
per chi è interessato…. 25-27 ottobre 2018: ESTRO Physics workshop, Malaga (Spagna). Track su «Predictive models for toxicity» (Chairs: T Rancati ed io) 12-14 Dicembre 2018: Workshop AIFM della ricerca in Fisica Medica (RT & MN), Verona (Core Team: C Cavedon M Iori, E Moretti, S Pallotta, S Russo ed io) 25-27 Marzo 2019: Corso AIFM su «Modelli predittivi in radioterapia con fasci esterni», IV Edizione, Napoli (Chairs: T Rancati, L Cella ed io) Seminario SSFM Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
You can also read