Modelli predittivi di tossicità dopo RT esterna nel distretto pelvico - C. Fiorino Medical Physics San Raffaele Institute, Milano, Italy

Page created by Jimmy Carlson
 
CONTINUE READING
Modelli predittivi di tossicità dopo RT esterna
nel distretto pelvico

C. Fiorino
Medical Physics
San Raffaele Institute, Milano, Italy

                                         Seminario SSFM
                                         Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive modeling & plan optimization:
the case of prostate cancer

Ex: first phase (pelvic nodes +
P+SV bed), post-op pts
SIB: 60/52.5 Gy in 30 fr

Follow boost up to 70-74 Gy
                                           Seminario SSFM
                                           Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive modeling & plan optimization:
 the case of prostate cancer

 Manual & automatic planning depend on our knowledge (ignorance) of
 dose-volume effects !...and local skills

 The case of knowledge-based machine learning systems

Courtesy: R Castriconi                                  Seminario SSFM
                                                        Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive modeling & plan optimization:
 the case of prostate cancer

KB model estimating DVHs based on anatomy

Translating into an automatic plan optimization tool, stressing the
system toward the best solution within the expected range
                                                            Seminario SSFM
                                                            Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive modeling & plan optimization:
  the case of prostate cancer

The amplitudes of the confidence intervals partly reflect
                                                            Seminario SSFM
inter-planner variability and, indirectly, our lack of      Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
knowledge of dose-volume effect !
Predictive modeling & plan optimization:

  Always (!), plan quality will improve primarily when more refined, reliable,
  validated models of dose-volume effects (and of the combined impact of
  other clinical, biological, omics parameters) are available (!)

  But, …. you must be skilled to obtain optimal plans in your clinic (!)
                                         Ex: HN cancer planners vs auto
                                         a) too rough constraint to contro-lateral parotid
                                         (Dmean
Modelling normal tissues response starting from clinical
data: a quite long (and partly successful !) story….

                                              Seminario SSFM
Lyman (1985)                                  Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Modelling normal tissues response starting from clinical
data: a quite long (and partly successful !) story….

    Quantitative (organ-based) relationships: a revolution in clinical RT in the
      ’90s and ‘00s
    «NTCP models» through DVH reduction (LKB, gEUD….)
    Impact of fractionation (LQ-based and updates…)
    Milestones of Emami/Burman paper (1991) and QUANTEC Supplement
       (2010)

                                     n               Vwhole
                             1/ n 
          EUD=  ∑ vi * (Di )                        Veff
                 i                
                                                                           Dmax
                               0 (serial, EUD≈Dmax)                 EUD
n ≈ volume effect              1 (parallel, EUD≈Dmean)
                                                                     Seminario SSFM
                                                                     Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive models of toxicity in RT:
a rapidly growing and evolving field

Development of (validated) predictive models:
 one of the 4 major strategic topics of research
 for RT in the next years !!!!

                                        Seminario SSFM
                                        Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Predictive models of toxicity in RT:
a rapidly growing and evolving field

Development of (validated) predictive models:
 one of the 4 major strategic topics of research
 for RT in the next years !!!!

                                        Seminario SSFM
                                        Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
The «Emami-Burman & Quantec-like organ based»
 approach to NTCP modelling: a still vital dogma……
QUANTEC:Quantitative Analysis of
  Normal Tissue Effects in Clinic
(steering Comm: 3 Radiation
    Oncologists, 5 Medical Physicists)

Organs as «independent and
   homogeneous entities» is a robust
   and practically usable approximation
   for most end-points
…an intuitive and natural way to describe
  radiotherapy-induced effects
Supported the translation from
   «qualitative» to «quantitative» RT
   ….knowledge condensed into organ
   constraints/EUDs/NTCPs

                                            Seminario SSFM
                                            Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Summary

Post-Quantec update (2010-2017) for the “main” organs:
o   Rectum
o   Bladder                                                   a   b
o   Bowel                                                     .   .

                                                              c
                                                              .
o   (Validation issues)

Not considered in the lecture:
Limited advancement in quantitative dose-volume
relationships for pelvic bone marrow (hematological tox,
models including DVHs and clinical predictors w/wout
Chemo) and penile bulb (erectile dysfunction)

Little/no advancement & large interest: Male gonads (fertility,
libido, testosterone levels…), female sexual organs (vaginal
dryness, dyspareunia, decline sexual life, …)                     Seminario SSFM
                                                                  Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Summary

Post-Quantec update (2010-2017) for the “main” organs:
o   Rectum
o   Bladder
o   Bowel
 Physica Medica (EJMP), Landoni et al. 32: 521-
   Validation
o532,         issues of the period 2009-2016)
      2016 (update

Not considered in the lecture:
Limited advancement in quantitative dose-volume
relationships for pelvic bone marrow (hematological tox,
models including DVHs and clinical predictors w/wout
Chemo) and penile bulb (erectile dysfunction)

Little/no advancement & large interest: Male gonads (fertility,
libido, testosterone levels…), female sexual organs (vaginal
dryness, dyspareunia, decline sexual life, …)                     Seminario SSFM
                                                                  Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Rectum: late bleeding

o   Confirmation of the prevalently serial behaviour (grade 2, grade 3)
o   Evidence of relevant clinical co-factors: abdominal surgery, cardio-vascular
    diseases (age, anti-coagulants, androgen deprivation)
o   Acute GI toxicity (consequential component)

                                                                       n-values:
                                                                       0.03-0.18
                                                                       Quantec: 0.09

                                                                        Seminario SSFM
Landoni et al: «Predicting toxicity in RT for prostate cancer», 2016    Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Rectum: late bleeding

o   Confirmation of the prevalently serial behaviour (grade 2, grade 3)
o   Evidence of relevant clinical co-factors: abdominal surgery, cardio-
    vascular diseases (age, anti-coagulants [protective], androgen deprivation)
o   Acute GI toxicity (consequential component)

                 Rancati 2011
                                                                  Dose modifying
                                                                  factor (NTCP
                                                                  models) ≈ 7-10%

                                                                  OR (Logistic MV
                                                                  models) ≈ 2-3

                                De Fraene 2012
                                                                    Seminario SSFM
                                                                    Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Rectum: late incontinence

o   Confirmation of a prevalently parallel behaviour (n=1)

                                                                      Seminario SSFM
Landoni et al: «Predicting toxicity in RT for prostate cancer» 2016   Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Rectum: late incontinence

o   Confirmation of a prevalently parallel behaviour (n=1)
o   Evidence of relevant clinical co-factors: abdominal surgery, colon disease,
    age, baseline status… likely more relevant than dose/volume-effect
o   Evidence of spatial effects (anal canal): Pelvic floor muscles as OARs?

                                                                     Smenk 2012

o   Noise due to events not due to RT (better prediction for persistent/chronic
    symptoms vs peak events)

                       Fiorino 2012
                                                                      Seminario SSFM
                                                                      Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Rectum: spatial effects

o   News regarding spatial dose effects (Sub volume and/or Pixel/Voxel wise Analyses:
    Buettner 2011,2012, Acosta 2013, 2017 Hamstra 2014, Wortel 2015, Drean 2016…)

                                                                 Oniukka et al. Submitted
                                                                 (AIROPROS0102 data)

                                                                   Seminario SSFM
    Late incontinence, anal          Late bleeding, rectum         Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
    canal dose maps                  dose maps
Bladder: poor data/models up to 2010

o   Lack of quantitative dose-volume relationships for GU tox, reported by
    three Reviews (Fiorino R&O 2009, Viswanathan IJROBP 2010, Budaus
    Eur Urol 2012)

o   Whole bladder irradiation:
    ≈55Gy threshold
    for late Grade 3 RTOG tox                                          Viswanathan 2010

o   Why ? Clinical factors influence the outcome (need of prospective data, baseline
    situation), different symptoms = different relationships (need of careful scoring,
    possibly patient-reported). Severe events relatively rare & no plateau with time =
    need of large numbers and long time
o   Why ? Variable filling concerns (Impact on DVH). Hollow organ (need to assess
    correlation between DVH of bladder/surface and wall).; what target ? (urethra,
    bladder wall, specific functional areas….)
o   Quantec conclusions: “Urgent” need of large, prospective, high-
    quality studies
                                                                              Seminario SSFM
                                                                              Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences

       o   First evidence of dose-volume effects for selected end-points; evidence of
           sensitive sub-regions (trigone). Sensitivity to altered fractionation

       o   Clinical predictors combined
           with dose-volume/surface data:
           baseline status, TURP, cardio-
           vascular diseases, hormones
       o   Acute GU tox
           (consequential component)
       o   Largely increased practice
           to use questionnaires to assess
           patient-reported scores
           (ex: IPSS, ICIQ)

                                                                       Seminario SSFM
Landoni et al: «Predicting toxicity in RT for prostate cancer» 2016    Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences

 o   First evidence of dose-volume effects for selected end-points; evidence of
     sensitive sub-regions (trigone). Sensitivity to altered fractionation

                                   Carillo 2014       Acute tox:
                                                      relationship with
                                                        Acute
                                                      weekly DVH/DSH

                                                      IPSS≥15 @ end RT

                                                      ∆IPSS≥10 @ end RT

                                  Palorini 2016

                                                                 Seminario SSFM
                                                                 Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….dose-maps analyses
    Improta 2016                                 Yahia 2016

    o     Acute ∆IPSS ≥ 10                          o   Mostly moderate late tox:

-       “some” volume effect for acute ∆IPSS ≥ 10 and moderate late
        dysuria, haematuria and ∆IPSS ≥ 10 (cranial & lateral extension)
                                                                         Seminario SSFM
-       Dose effect prevalent for late incontinence                      Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….trigone dose
Improta 2016                                 Gadhiar 2014

    Acute ∆IPSS ≥ 10

                                                                   Late
                                                                   ∆IPSS ≥ 10

Acute ∆IPSS ≥ 15
o     Dmean/Dmax V/S>80-90 Gy to the trigone associated with relevant increase
      of GU tox, (Heemsberger 2010, Ghadiar 2014, Palorini 2015, Improta 2016)
-     Trigone dose effect: more evident @ (Equivalent) doses > 80Gy
                                                                Seminario SSFM
                                                                Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….dose effect/serial behaviour

 o   Dose effect for moderate-severe late tox: recent confirmations from DUE01
                                                   3-year late patient-reported
                                                   incontinence (end-points of
                                                   different severity) vs (2Gy
                                                   equivalent) prescribed
                                                   dose, 298 pts
                                                   (best α/β=0.8Gy)

                                                   Cozzarini 2017

                              Best NTCP fit for 3-year late «severe» patient-
                              reported symptoms (Comprehensive end-point
                              including ∆IPSS ≥ 10, incontinence, bleeding,
                              stricture), 259 pts
                              (best α/β=1Gy, best fit n-value: 0.01)

                              Palorini: to be submitted

                                                              Seminario SSFM
                                                              Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences

 o   First evidence of dose-volume effects for selected end-points; evidence of
     sensitive sub-regions (trigone). Sensitivity to altered fractionation
 o   Suggestion of a higher than expected impact of moderate hypofractionation
     (Pollack 2013, Fiorino 2014, Sanguineti 2016, Palorini 2016) more evident in
     post-prostatectomy pts and high dose schedules delivered @2.5-3.0 Gy/fr, on
     incontinence and haematuria. Apparently very low α/β (
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences

o   Sensitivity to altered
    fractionation
    (post-op patients)
Fitting data of 563 post-operative pts
treated with conventional or hypo (3
protocols), 3-year severe incontinence
(INC) and hematuria (HEM)
                                         INC                  D50 (Gy)        K      α/β (Gy)

                                         Best-fit parameter      449         5.3       0.81
TOX(%) = 100/[1 +    (D50/BED)K]
                                         95% CI*               310-587     0-49.4    0.1-4.8

BED = D x [1 + d/(α/β)]
                                         HEM                  D50 (Gy)       K       α/β (Gy)

                                         Best-fit parameter     500         5.6        0.74

                                         95% CI*              430-570     0.9-10.3    0.0-1.8

                                                                         Seminario SSFM
                                                                         Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences

      o          Sensitivity to altered fractionation (post-op patients)
                                                                            INC                  D50 (Gy)    K     α/β (Gy)   γ (Gy/day)

                                                                            Best-fit parameter     123      5.1       5          0.66
      TOX(%) = 100/[1 + (D50/BED)K]
                                                                            95% CI*               0 - 302   0-72      -        0.2 – 1.2

                                                                                                                   α/β (Gy)   γ (Gy/day)
      BED = D x [1 + d/(α/β)] - γ x T                                       HEM                  D50 (Gy)    K

                                                                            Best-fit parameter     156      3.4       5          0.85
3y % risk HEMATURIA

14
                                                                            95% CI*               0 - 465   0-25      -        0.3 – 1.3
12
                                             N=80, 2.55Gy/fr, 71.4Gy
10

 8                                  N=50, 2.9Gy/fr, 58Gy

 6                    N=117, 2.35Gy/fr, 65.8Gy

 4
          N=929, 1.8Gy/fr, 70.2Gy

 2

 0
     40                  50                  60                70      80
                                     BED (Gy)

                                                                                                                   Seminario SSFM
                                                                                                                   Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….new evidences

 o   Clinical predictors combined with dose-volume/surface data:
     baseline status, TURP, cardio-vascular diseases, hormones

                               Baseline status largely modulates dose-volume
                               effects (and probably the impact of daily dose ?)

                      - Cardio-vascular
                        problems (…smoking,
                        hypertension…), TURP
                        well assessed with
                        large ORs depending
                        on end-points
                      - Neo adjuvant
                        hormone reported to
                        be protective                       Seminario SSFM
                        (OR≈0.25-0.5)                       Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….practical consequences ?

                       o   Dose effect (likely) more relevant than
                           volume effect, >80 Gy (EQD2)
                       o    Sparing Trigone/Bladder overlapped
                           with PTV in >80GY (EQD2)
                           schedules ??
                       o   Evidence of (relatively) small volume
                           effect & trigone sensitivity consistent
                           with positive impact of IGRT and MRI-
                           based planning (Zelefsky 2012, Green
                           2013, Ali 2013) in reducing GU tox

                       o   IGRT & Motion issues ?

                                               Seminario SSFM
                                               Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bladder: 2010-2017….Motion issues

o   The case of prostate cancer: bladder base is quite stable        The absolute
    amount of bladder receiving “high-dose” is relatively stable !
o   Better with IGRT (prostate matching)
                                             Dose to
                                             Bladder
                                             base: small
                                             systematic
                                             error (IGRT
                                             vs plan)

                                                                      Palorini 2016

                                                                       Seminario SSFM
                                                                       Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bowel: Quantec & controversial issues

o       Quantec suggestions “driven” by few published works (2003-2008) mainly
        referred to rectum/gyno ca pts treated with 3DCRT (+ Chemotherapy), not
        confirmed by the only IMRT study (Roeske 2003)

o  Main criticism: high correlation
Between low (V10-V15) and high (V40-V50)
dose in whole pelvic RT delivered with 3DCRT

    cc 1800,0
       1600,0                                                             Kavanagh 2010
       1400,0
       1200,0
       1000,0

        800,0
        600,0
        400,0
        200,0
          0,0
                0,0   10,0   20,0   30,0   40,0   50,0   60,0
                                                         Gy

                                                                      Seminario SSFM
                                                                      Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bowel: news in the IMRT era

o   Dose-volume relationships for acute tox (mainly
    diarrhea) with IMRT (+/- CHT) published in the last
    years for pts treated with rectal, anal, gyno, bladder and
    prostate ca
o   Most studies found correlation with “high” (V30-V50)
    doses: Roeske (gyno) 2003 Fiorino (prostate) 2009, Perna
    (prostate) 2010, Chen (gyno) 2014, Mc Donald (bladder) 2013,
    Olsen (anal) 2017 , Sini (prostate) 2017
o   Studies with 3DCRT pts found “V15” as main predictor
    (Fiorino 2009, Robertson 2010, Chen 2012)
o   Different constrainst, depending on end-point (for
    instance: different severity of diarrhea) and type of pts
    (largely influenced by the bowel overlapped with PTV !)

o  Impact of clinical variables:                                   Ex: V15 vs Acute grade 2-3
                                                                     GI, rectal cancer, 3DCRT
Chemotherapy, Age, Previous surgery
                                                                               Robertson 2010
                                                                           Seminario SSFM
                                                                           Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bowel: news in the IMRT era

o   Lack of prospective trials with patient-reported score
o   Lack of dose-volume relationships on late tox
o   First results from IHU prospective trial (whole-pelvis
    IMRT, prostate cancer)

                                                    Association between bowel loops
                                                    DVH and patient reported
                                                    moderate/severe worsening of loose
                                                    stools symptoms at half/end IMRT
                                                    Suggested constraints: V42
Bowel: news in the IMRT era

o   Depending on the situation, hard to reduce bowel tox if delivering
    «highly tailored» IMRT

                                        «Background»
                                        likely to be due to
                                        clinical
                                        parameters and
                                        to the bowel
                                        overlapped with
                                        PTV

o   Bowel motion: challenging issue…how robust are DVHs with respect to
    motion ? Are there more stable regions ?
                                                                     Seminario SSFM
                                                                     Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Bowel: motion issue, a study in progress

o   The motion of bowel is very large and unpredictable, big impact on DVH
    (Hysing 2008, Sanguineti 2008); lack of studies with sufficient statistics
o   «Probability maps estimated by daily MVCT during Tomotherapy
    (prostate patients) by applying a semi-automated contouring method
    (Perna 2016)
o   Data on 10 pts show that the «stable» bowel volume is small and follows
    «regular» patterns

                               80%

                               50%

                               Plan

                                                                      Seminario SSFM
o   Toward the inclusion of the impact of bowel motion                Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
    into dose-volume relationships ?
Validation issues

-   Internal validation: more and more
    frequently performed
-   External (independent) validation: very rare
                                                   Van der Schaaf Red J 2015
-   Limits in generalizability ….
-   In particular: extension outside the domain
    of the original cohorts of pts

-   Need of well conducted, independent
    validation studies !

                                                               Seminario SSFM
                                                               Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Validation issues

-   Acute, patient-reported

             Nocturia         deltaIPSS >=10

                                                          Yahya 2016
                                               Seminario SSFM
                                               Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Validation issues

                    -   Late, physician-reported

                                             Yahya 2016
                                  Seminario SSFM
                                  Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Models: Conclusive remarks

-   Rectal tox : confirmation & news (….not only bleeding, specific spatial
    effects, ….)
-   GU tox: Started to appear multi-variable predictive models for specific
    and comprehensive end-points: relevance of clinical predictors, baseline
    condition, often «almost serial» behaviour
-   Bowel tox: some improvement but a lot to understand…
-   Hematological tox: more «mature» evidence of dose-volume effects
-   Sexual dysfunction: urgent need (!)

- Additional Priorities: Patient-reported scoring; Spatial/local effects
(voxel/pixel wise comparison methods); impact of motion (bowel first !);
Need of independent validation studies to improve the generalizability
of models

    (   : Compared to Quantec 2010 )                                Seminario SSFM
                                                                    Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
Thanks for your attention

Thanks ! C. Cozzarini, T. Rancati, G Sanguineti, R. Valdagni,
  F. Bedenchini, C. Bianconi, S. Broggi, V. Carillo, R. Castriconi, G.M. Cattaneo,
  A. Cicchetti, I. Improta, G. Gagliardi, S. Gianolini, V. Landoni, M. Mori, A
  Nahum, E. Onjukka, F. Palorini, P. Passoni, L. Perna, R. Raso, C. Sini, …..

                    Physica Medica (EJMP),
                    Landoni et al. 32: 521-532, 2016

                                                                 Seminario SSFM
                                                                 Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
per chi è interessato….

25-27 ottobre 2018: ESTRO Physics workshop, Malaga
   (Spagna). Track su «Predictive models for toxicity»
   (Chairs: T Rancati ed io)

12-14 Dicembre 2018: Workshop AIFM della ricerca in Fisica
   Medica (RT & MN), Verona
   (Core Team: C Cavedon M Iori, E Moretti, S Pallotta, S Russo ed io)

25-27 Marzo 2019: Corso AIFM su «Modelli predittivi in
   radioterapia con fasci esterni», IV Edizione, Napoli
   (Chairs: T Rancati, L Cella ed io)

                                                                Seminario SSFM
                                                                Milano, 31 Maggio 2018
You can also read