MINUTES SHIRE OF KOJONUP - Ordinary Council Meeting 20 June 2017
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
SHIRE OF KOJONUP
MINUTES
Ordinary Council Meeting
20 June 2017
Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 2
MINUTES FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON 20 JUNE 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 DECLARATION OF OPENING AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF GUESTS 3
2 ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES 3
3 SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE 4
4 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME 4
5 PETITIONS, DEPUTATIONS & PRESENTATIONS 4
6 APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE 5
7 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 5
8 ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE PRESIDING MEMBER WITHOUT DISCUSSION 5
9 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 5
10 CORPORATE SERVICES REPORTS 6
10.1 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – MONTHLY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITY (MAY 2017) 6
10.2 MONTHLY PAYMENT LISTING 9
10.3 CORPORATE BUSINESS PLAN – 2016/2017 – 2020/2021 11
11 WORKS & SERVICES REPORTS 13
12 REGULATORY SERVICES REPORTS 14
12.1 INTERPRETATION STRATEGY FUTURE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE KOJONUP RAILWAY
STATION AND LINE (HELEN MUNT – HERITAGE AND INTERPRETATION CONSULTANT
JANUARY 2017) 14
12.2 REVISED LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS & LOCAL RECOVERY PLAN21
12.3 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FOR NEW SINGLE DWELLING ON LOT 6103 FOLEY
ROAD, QUALEUP 24
13 EXECUTIVE & GOVERNANCE REPORTS 30
14 AGED CARE SERVICES REPORTS 30
15 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & TOURISM REPORTS 30
16 COMMITTEES OF COUNCIL 31
16.1 NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE 31
16.2 KODJA PLACE ADVISORY COMMITTEE 37
16.3 AUDIT COMMITTEE 38
17 MOTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN 39
18 NEW BUSINESS 39
19 CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS 39
20 NEXT MEETING 39
21 CLOSURE 39
22 ATTACHMENTS (SEPARATE) 39
Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 3
MINUTES
1 DECLARATION OF OPENING AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF GUESTS
The Shire President declared the meeting open at 3:00pm and alerted the meeting of the
procedures for emergencies including evacuation, designated exits and muster points and
drew the meeting’s attention to the disclaimer below:
Disclaimer
No person should rely on or act on the basis of any advice or information provided by a
Member or Officer, or on the content of any discussion occurring, during the course of the
meeting.
The Shire of Kojonup expressly disclaims liability for any loss or damage suffered by any
person as a result of relying on or acting on the basis of any advice or information provided
by a member or officer, or the content of any discussion occurring, during the course of the
meeting.
Where an application for an approval, a license or the like is discussed or determined during
the meeting, the Shire warns that neither the applicant, nor any other person or body, should
rely upon that discussion or determination until written notice of either an approval and the
conditions which relate to it, or the refusal of the application has been issued by the Shire.
2 ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES
Cr Ronnie Fleay Shire President
Cr Robert Sexton Deputy Shire President
Cr Frank Pritchard
Cr Ned Radford
Cr Judith Warland
Cr Jill Mathwin
Mr Rick Mitchell-Collins Chief Executive Officer
Mr Anthony Middleton Manager Corporate Services
Miss Miranda Wallace Executive Assistant
Mr Rob Cowie Regulatory/Administration Officer
Mrs Michelle Dennis Development Services Coordinator
Members of the Gallery 2
APOLOGIES
Cr Graeme Hobbs
Mr Phil Shepherd Town Planner
LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Cr Ian Pedler
Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 4
3 SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE
Nil
4 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
Nil
5 PETITIONS, DEPUTATIONS & PRESENTATIONS
The Presiding Member welcomed the two Members of the Gallery to the meeting and presented a
‘Certificate of Appreciation’ to Mrs Lyn Boys for the Kojonup Volunteer Awards 2017 for the
‘Volunteer of the Year’ award category and made the following comments:
“Lyn has been an active member of the Kojonup News team since 1994, first starting as
a sub editor when much of the work was done by hand, and then becoming chief editor in
1999, which then meant one having to learn to embrace the new automated computerized
systems. Lyn has only recently stepped down as Chief Editor, yet she is still very much
has a significant role in the running of the newspaper.
Lyn has been involved in the Kojonup Telecentre and then its transition to the Kojonup
Community Resource Centre. Years ago, with the assistance of two other people, Lyn was
instrumental in the formation of the first Kojonup Community Recycling Group.
She has a genuine passion for genealogy which has led her to helping numerous families
research their family trees as well as her own. This love of history has also seen Lyn
lending her typing and writing skills to the Kojonup Historical Society.
Lyn has been described by those who nominated her as - … ‘a constant source of
inspiration and enthusiasm. She is a patient and understanding person, who has a great
sense of community spirit and pride.’”
Mrs Boys thanked the Shire President and the Council for the award and took the opportunity to say
a few words to the meeting. The Shire President then awarded a second ‘Certificate of Appreciation’
to Ron Wright Bulldozing which was accepted by Peter Wright on behalf of the business. The Shire
President made the following comments:
“Ron Wright Bulldozing has been an active business in the Shire of Kojonup and
surrounds since 1962. The company was started by Ron as a side business for the family
farm. The longest serving employee is Clinton Elphick who joined the business 26 years
ago and still works with the company today.
In 2004/05 Peter took the company over from his father. Aside from bulldozing, the
company also readily lends itself to assisting the Shire during a bushfire by pushing over
burning trees and cutting firebreaks, etc. Council cannot express how much it appreciates
that when there’s a bushfire emergency, it’s never an issue to give Peter a call and request
assistance even if it means they’re in the middle of a job and are forced to drop everything.
Over the duration of the company’s history, it has completed numerous contracted
projects for the Shire and surely sunk more than half of the dams on farms in the district.Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 5
Always, the level of service provided and the outcome of the finished product has been
exemplary.
Ron Wright Bulldozing provides a fantastic service and is a credit to the community of
Kojonup. The Shire of Kojonup looks forward to doing many more years of business with
Ron Wright Bulldozing which will be owned and operated by Simon Klopper from Boyup
Brook in the near future. All the best to Peter who is leaving the business and starting a
new chapter in his life.”
3:08pm – Mr Wright thanked the Presiding Member and the Shire for his award and departed from
the Chamber.
6 APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Cr Warland requested a leave of absence for the 15 August 2017 Council Meeting.
COUNCIL DECISION
56/17 Moved Cr Sexton, seconded Cr Mathwin that Cr Warland be granted a Leave
of Absence from the 15 August 2017 Council meeting.
CARRIED 6/0
7 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
ORDINARY MEETING 16 MAY 2017
COUNCIL DECISION
57/17 Moved Cr Pritchard, seconded Cr Radford that the Minutes of the Ordinary
Meeting of Council held on 16 May 2017 be confirmed as a true record.
CARRIED 6/0
8 ANNOUNCEMENTS by the Presiding Member without discussion
Nil
9 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Item 12.1
Cr Radford declared an ‘Impartiality’ interest as he is the President of Kojonup Tourist
Railway Inc.
Cr Pritchard declared a ‘Proximity’ interest as he lives directly opposite the Railway
Precinct.Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 6
10 CORPORATE SERVICES REPORTS
10.1 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – MONTHLY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITY
(MAY 2017)
AUTHOR: Anthony Middleton – Manager Corporate Services
DATE: Thursday, 15 June 2017
FILE NO: FM.FNR.2
ATTACHMENT: 10.1 Monthly Statement of Financial Activity
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
Nil.
SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to note the Monthly Financial Statements for the period ending
31 May 2017.
BACKGROUND
In addition to good governance, the presentation to the Council of monthly financial reports
is a statutory requirement, with these to be presented at an ordinary meeting of the Council
within two (2) months after the end of the period to which the statements relate.
COMMENT
The attached Statement of Financial Activity for the period 1 July 2016 to 31 May 2017
represents eleven (11) months, or 92% of the year. The following items are worthy of noting:
Surplus position of $2.0m. This represents a significant spike to what would normally
have been expected, due primarily to the receival of $740,000 Roads to Recovery
bridge grant, that will not be expended until June;
Operating results:
o 87% of budgeted operating revenue received; and
o 91% of budgeted operating expenditure spent;
Capital expenditure achieved 50% of budgeted projects;
The value of outstanding rates equates to 6.2% of 2016/2017 rates raised, which
includes previous years arrears but excludes deferred rates;
Cash holdings of $4.27m of which $3.05m is held in cash backed reserve accounts;
Page 7 & 8 of the statements detail major variations from year to date (amended)
budgets in accordance with Council Policy 2.1.6.
The following capital expenditure projects have exceeded their authorised budgets:
% of
Resp. Original YTD Annual
COA Description Officer Budget Actual Budget
C138 Bush Fire Repeater Tower CEO $0 $12,527 n/a
C299 Child care Centre Construction MRS $0 $1,445 n/a
C297 Independent Living Units - Land CEO $108,000 $158,288 147%
C165 Landfill Site – Boundary Fence MRS $25,000 $28,739 115%
C257 Landfill Site – Access Road MRS $0 $118 n/a
C278 New Access to Sporting Complex MWS $151,167 $162,344 107%
C252 Town Drainage Renewal MWS $10,000 $22,868 229%
Bitumen Reseal - Broomehill Kojonup
C248 Road MWS $60,000 $72,811 121%Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 7
Account C297 is merely an allocation error, as this project has three (3) separate account
numbers. The project as a whole has not exceeded the authorised budget.
The Council is thoroughly aware of the financial performance of the Black Cockatoo Café
and a decision has now been made on its future ownership intentions. As an update, during
the month of May 2017, revenue dropped considerably (35%) from April’s figures, while
expenditure slightly increased. This results in a loss for the month of $16,725. As at 31 May
2017, the operating deficit (excluding capital grants) was $107,900, significantly surpassing
the revised budget adopted in January of $78,000.
CONSULTATION
Nil.
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Regulation 34 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 sets out
the basic information which must be included in the monthly reports to Council.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Council Policy 2.1.6 defines the content of the financial reports.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
This item reports on the current financial position of the Shire. The recommendation does
not in itself have a financial implication.
STRATEGIC/CORPORATE IMPLICATIONS
Community Strategic Plan 2013 - 2023
Outcomes
G1 – Being Well Governed
Corporate Business Plan 2013 – 2017
Objectives:
G1.1.2 – Maintain a structured forward planning process in accordance with legislation
and community aspirations
G1.1.4 – Maintain robust systems and controls
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
There are no risk management implications for this report.
ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLICATIONS
There are no asset management implications for this report.
SOUTHERN LINK VROC (VOLUNTARY REGIONAL ORGANISATION OF
COUNCILS) IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS
Simple MajorityShire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 8
COUNCIL DECISION/OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
58/17 Moved Cr Mathwin, seconded Cr Warland that the monthly financial
statements for the period 1 July 2016 to 31 May 2017, as attached, be noted.
CARRIED 6/0Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 9
10.2 MONTHLY PAYMENT LISTING
AUTHOR: Christine Coldwell – Finance Officer
DATE: Friday, 9 June 2017
FILE NO: FM.AUT.1
ATTACHMENT: 10.2 Monthly Payment Listing 01/05/2017 – 31/05/2017
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
Nil
SUMMARY
To receive the list of payments covering the month of May 2017
BACKGROUND
Not applicable.
COMMENT
The attached list of payments is submitted for receipt by the Council.
Any comments or queries regarding the list of payments is to be directed to the Manager of
Corporate Services prior to the meeting.
CONSULTATION
No consultation was required.
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Regulation 12(1)(a) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996
provides that payment may only be made from the municipal fund or trust fund if the Local
Government has delegated the function to the Chief Executive Officer.
The Chief Executive Officer has delegated authority to authorise payments. Relevant staff
have also been issued with delegated authority to issue orders for the supply of goods and
services subject to budget limitations.
Regulation 13 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 provides
that if the function of authorising payments is delegated to the Chief Executive Officer then
a list of payments is to be presented to the Council at the next ordinary meeting and recorded
in the minutes.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Council’s Policy 2.1.2 provides authorisations and restrictions relative to purchasing
commitments.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
All payments made in line with Council Policy.
STRATEGIC/CORPORATE IMPLICATIONS
There are no strategic/corporate implications involved with presentation of the list of
payments.Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 10
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
A control measure to ensure transparency of financial systems and controls regarding creditor
payments.
ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLICATIONS
There are no asset management implications for this report.
SOUTHERN LINK VROC (VOLUNTARY REGIONAL ORGANISATION OF
COUNCILS) IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS
Simple Majority
COUNCIL DECISION/OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
59/17 Moved Cr Radford, seconded Cr Warland that in accordance with Regulation
13 (1) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the list
of payments as attached made under delegated authority:
FROM – 1 May 2017 TO – 31 May 2017
Municipal Cheques 13875 – 13892 $55,713.60
EFTs 18644 – 18908 $686,980.21
Direct Debits $565,731.98
Total $1,308,425.79
be received.
CARRIED 6/0Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 11
10.3 CORPORATE BUSINESS PLAN – 2016/2017 – 2020/2021
AUTHOR: Anthony Middleton – Manager Corporate Services
DATE: Thursday, 15 June 2016
FILE NO: CM.CIR.1
ATTACHMENT: 10.3 Updated Corporate Business Plan 2016/2017 – 2020/2021
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
Nil.
SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to consider the Corporate Business Plan for 2016/2017 to
2020/2021 to ensure compliance with the Local Government Act 1995.
BACKGROUND
The Local Government Act 1995 Section 5.56(1) and (2) requires that each Local
Government is ‘to plan for the future of the district’, by developing plans in accordance with
the regulations.
The Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996 requires each Local Government
to adopt a Strategic Community Plan and a Corporate Business Plan. In relation to the
Corporate Business Plan, the plan is to be for a period of four (4) years and shall be reviewed
each year.
COMMENT
A comprehensive review of the ten (10) year Community Strategic Plan is nearing
completion and therefore the 2016/2017 review of the Corporate Business Plan has not been
prioritised. Following adoption of the Community Strategic Plan for 2016/2017, a more
meaningful and relevant Corporate Business Plan will be written in the coming months. As
such, this item has been completed to ensure legislative compliance only, albeit with little
practical use.
The attached Corporate Business Plan has only received minor amendments from the
previous year’s review. A four year operating statement has been added to give additional
focus to the “Business as Usual” operations of the Shire, and the traffic light system has been
updated where appropriate.
CONSULTATION
Chief Executive Officer
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Local Government Act 1995
Local Government (Administration) Regulations (1996)
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Nil
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
NilShire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 12
STRATEGIC/CORPORATE IMPLICATIONS
This Corporate Business Plan is a primary component of the Shire’s integrated planning
process.
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
Compliance with Section 5.56 of the Local Government Act 1995
ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLICATIONS
Nil
SOUTHERN LINK VROC (VOLUNTARY REGIONAL ORGANISATION OF
COUNCILS) IMPLICATIONS
Nil
VOTING REQUIREMENTS
Simple
COUNCIL DECISION/OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
60/17 Moved Cr Warland, seconded Cr Pritchard that Council adopt the annual
review of the Corporate Business Plan as attached.
CARRIED 6/0Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 13
11 WORKS & SERVICES REPORTS
NilShire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 14
12 REGULATORY SERVICES REPORTS
12.1 INTERPRETATION STRATEGY FUTURE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE
KOJONUP RAILWAY STATION AND LINE (HELEN MUNT – HERITAGE AND
INTERPRETATION CONSULTANT JANUARY 2017)
AUTHOR: Phil Shephard – Town Planner
DATE: Tuesday, 9 May 2017
FILE NO: RC.MUS.4
ATTACHMENT: 12.3.1 Interpretation Strategy – Kojonup Tourist Railway &
Line
12.3.2 Kojonup Tourist Railway Inc. comments
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
Cr Radford in his capacity as President of Kojonup Tourist Railway Inc. and Cr Hobbs in his
capacity as a committee member of the Association.
SUMMARY
To consider the report for the future use and developments at the Kojonup Railway Station
precinct prepared for the Shire by the selected heritage consultant (Helen Munt).
The consultant’s recommendation is to:
Adopt the report and request staff prepare an Action Plan including projected
timings/costings for Council consideration;
Proceed with the relocation of the steam locomotive to the site;
Advise the public the strategy has been adopted; and
Advise the Kojonup Historical Society, Kojonup Visitor Centre and State Heritage
Office the strategy has been adopted and provide an opportunity for them to comment.
BACKGROUND
The Council in April 2015 considered the proposal from the Kojonup Tourist Railway Inc.
to relocate from Perth a donated P class (P508) steam locomotive to a site adjacent to the
existing wool wagon at the eastern end of Reserve 51700 to Albany Highway. The
locomotive would be housed in a 27m x 6m enclosure constructed of steel frames and clad
with weld mesh fencing for the walls to protect the locomotive and metal sheeting for the
pitched roof.
The Council in July 2015 resolved to advise the Kojonup Tourist Railway Inc. that whilst it
supports the relocation of the steam locomotive, prior to deciding on its location within the
railway precinct, it will engage the services of a Heritage and/or Interpretation Consultant to
prepare an overall plan for the railway station heritage precinct. The plan will guide these
types of developments within the reserve and will determine a site for the display of the
locomotive.
The Council in October 2015 selected Helen Munt (Heritage and Interpretation Consultant)
to complete the strategy for future use and development within the Kojonup Railway Station
precinct.
COMMENT
The Kojonup Railway Station (fmr) Group (Loading Platform, c.1912; Goods Shed, 1922;
Station Building, 1925; Spotted Gums, 1920s; Bus Shed, 1943; Wool Loading Platform) areShire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 15
contained on the statutory State Register of Heritage Places (permanent entry 16 May 2008)
under the Heritage of Western Australia Act 1990.
This places obligations on both the Shire and Kojonup Tourist Railway Inc. to manage, use
and develop the site to protect the heritage values of the site.
The Shire has the Management Order for Reserve 51700 (expiring in 2035) for the purpose
of operating a tourist railway. The Shire may grant a licence to others over any part of the
reserve for the designated purpose subject to compliance with the conditions in the
Management Order. The precinct includes Reserve 51700 and consists of some 7 lots and is
approximately 2.95 hectares in area.
The consultant has now completed the Interpretation Strategy for the Council to consider.
The report is very comprehensive including background, history, analysis, strategies and
actions for the future use and development within the Kojonup Railway Station precinct.
The report advises the fundamental heritage values associated with the Kojonup railway is:
The only light construction branch line left existing in WA; and
A good example of a group of railway structures that is further enhanced by the rare
and unique 1920’s planting of Spotted Gums.
The strategy achieves the requirements of the consultant’s brief to address the following
issues:
To provide an overall plan for the railway heritage precinct to guide future use and
development within the railway reserve;
To make recommendations on the siting and use of future developments within the
precinct based on the existing heritage values for the site;
To consult with Kojonup Tourist Railway Inc, Kojonup Visitor Centre, Kojonup
Historical Society and State Heritage Office;
To allow opportunities for additional landowner and public comment; and
To determine the best position for the recently acquired P class (P508) steam
locomotive to be displayed.
The report was provided to the Kojonup Tourist Railway Inc. for their comment and they
have responded positively to the report recommendations except the relocation of the RV
dump point which is not supported due to existing convenient location for overnight guests
and potential costs to relocate. The group also provided additional comments on various parts
of the report and their proposals for the place over time. The support of the Kojonup Tourist
Railway Inc. will be a major factor in the successful implementation of the strategy and its
actions.
The actions are contained in section 2.7 of the report (pages 48 – 58 of the report) and
includes 4 sub-sections with short, medium and longer term recommendations for
implementing the strategy. Staff now recommend that these actions in section 2.7 be
organised into an Action Plan including projected timings/costings for Council consideration.
Flowing from the report outcomes, Council can now proceed and approve the Kojonup
Tourist Railway Inc. to relocate the P class (P508) steam locomotive within the green zone
area shown on Figure 07: Kojonup Railway Station Precinct – Current indicating potential
development areas (page 40 of the report). The site (opposite the wool wagon adjoining
Albany Highway) is shown below and has now received the necessary approval from the
State Heritage Office and is supported by the Interpretation Strategy. From the submissionsShire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 16
received by Council in July 2015, it is still expected that some residents do not support the
relocation of the steam locomotive to the site.
The final design of the enclosure to house the locomotive has not been settled between
Council and the Kojonup Tourist Railway Inc. and needs to achieve the objectives of
providing security to the locomotive and providing an attractive visual appearance to passer-
by’s/visitors to the site.
Proposed
locomotive
site
Reserve 51700 Kojonup Railway Station Precinct showing proposed Locomotive Site
Proposed
locomotive
site
Albany Highway showing proposed Locomotive Site
The general Kojonup community were consulted in July 2015 on the proposal to relocate the
P class stream locomotive to the railway station precinct. The community have not been
provided with an opportunity to comment on the Interpretation Strategy and Council may
choose to advertise the Interpretation Strategy for public comment prior to finalising the report
and its recommendations.Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 17
The Council has a number of options available to it, which are discussed below:
1 Not adopt the Interpretation Strategy
The Council can choose to not adopt the strategy and advise the consultant giving
reasons. If this option was chosen, the strategy outcomes would not proceed and none
of the recommended actions would be implemented.
2 Adopt the Interpretation Strategy
The Council can choose to adopt the strategy, or make any modifications considered
necessary. If this option was chosen, the strategy outcomes would proceed and the
recommended actions would be implemented.
3 Defer the Interpretation Strategy
The Council can choose to defer the matter for a period of time and seek additional
information from the consultant or other party, if deemed necessary, proceeding to
decide.
CONSULTATION
Kojonup Tourist Railway Inc.
Helen Munt (Heritage and Interpretation Consultant) provided a briefing on the report and
its outcomes to Councillors and Senior Staff in April 2017.
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Planning and Development Act 2005 – Town Planning Scheme No. 3 is an operative local
planning scheme under the Act.
Heritage of Western Australia Act 1990 - The Kojonup Railway Station (Fmr) Group is
contained on the State Register of Heritage Places.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
There are no Town Planning Scheme Policies that apply to this proposal.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The completed project achieved the budget figure of $10,769.09 (excluding GST).
Additional funds estimated to be required to implement the strategy will be provided in the
Action Plan including potential external funding sources.
STRATEGIC/CORPORATE IMPLICATIONS
Community Strategic Plan 2013 – 2023
Outcomes:
S2 – Staying Active and Entertained
Corporate Business Plan 2013 – 2017
Objectives:
S2.1.2 Promote Kojonup as a place to visit – tourism
S2.1.4 Preserve and promote our history and culture
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
The item covers several risk areas to Council including strategy and planning, compliance
and reputation functions. The organisational risk and proposed treatment or mitigation is
summarised in the following table from the Shire’s Risk Management Plan:Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 18
Risk Description Risk Risk Risk Risk Treatment
Likelihood Consequence Classification
Council does not Rare Minor Low Manage by routine
adopt the procedures, unlikely
Interpretation to need specific
Strategy application of
resources
Council does not Possible Minor Medium Managed by
approve the display specific monitoring
of the steam or response
locomotive procedures
ASSET MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
The Kojonup Railway Station precinct is managed by the Shire of Kojonup under the
Management Order issued for the land.
The steam locomotive and shelter building are to be maintained by the Kojonup Tourist
Railway Inc. as the proponents/operators of the facility and as part of the donor’s conditions
for the loan of the locomotive. The site of the shelter building forms part of land managed
by the Shire of Kojonup and it is expected the shelter will be added to the Asset Management
Plan.
SOUTHERN LINK VROC (VOLUNTARY REGIONAL ORGANISATION OF
COUNCILS) STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLICATIONS
The item is not covered in the Southern Link VROC Strategic Directions 2015-2020 plan.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS
Simple Majority
3:12pm – Cr Pritchard declared a ‘Proximity’ interest and Cr Radford declared an
‘Impartiality’ interest and both departed from the Chamber.
COUNCIL DECISION/OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
61/17 Moved Cr Sexton, seconded Cr Mathwin that Council:
1) Accept the Interpretation Strategy: Future Use and Development of the
Kojonup Railway Station and Line (Helen Munt - Heritage and
Interpretation Consultant January 2017) report and instruct the CEO
to prepare an Action Plan including projected timings/costings for
Council consideration.
2) Advise the public that the Interpretation Strategy has been accepted
and can be viewed at the Shire Office, Library and online.
3) Advise the Kojonup Historical Society, Kojonup Visitor Centre and
State Heritage Office that the Interpretation Strategy has been accepted
and provide them with a copy.
CARRIED 4/0
3:16pm – Cr Radford & Cr Pritchard returned to the Chamber.Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 19
Attachment 12.1.2
Page 3: Some main recommendations
Agree all points except reinstating Dump point – cost not viable and could run into
thousands of Dollars move. It is convenient for RV while parking overnight.
Page 22: Positioning of the P508
Green area (see Map Page 40) south side of the line opposite the Wool Wagon. Erect
signage to reflect the examples of transportation prior to Road transport. Although
the P Class locomotive did not run on the Katanning to Kojonup line it was of
significant importance to Kojonup. Freight, Mail and Stock as well as passengers,
including troops would have travelled to Katanning by rail to catch the P Class trains
on the Great Southern Railway line linking Albany to Perth. This would have been a
lifeline to Kojonup prior to Road Transport. The display of the P508 would be a
drawcard to the Railway.
PART 2
Interpretative Strategy – Unlimited possibilities with signage, information boards, walk trails etc
Page 27: Historic sites and lost elements.
The Cream Shed – Original Ladies waiting room.
We believe this is located in a shed on Glenys Russells property. It could be re-
erected.
We also think the Soap sign on the outside of one of these buildings is in the
possession of a local.
Hopefully this could be recovered for reproduction.
If ever the buildings taken to the Show grounds were to be made redundant perhaps
they could also be bought back and place at the Railway precinct.
Page 29: The Wool Wagon
Put up signage to describe that this was the site of the Station Masters House.
Mention the connection between the horse drawn Wagon and Rail Transport.
We believe that the Tall Tree in the corner near the wool wagon may have been
there when the Station Masters house was still in place but the others may have
been planted many years ago by the town scape committee when it was still
operating.
Page 31: Wagin Yard Semaphore Signals
The Wagin Semaphore Signals could be erected by the P508 in the Green area (see
Map Page 40) south side of the line opposite the Wool Wagon. Although these were
not used here they could be also a draw card to the area as an example of what was
used on other lines.
Page 34: The locked gate at Apex Park is inhibiting visitors from accessing the Railway
Precinct via Apex Park.
We understand that this is a major safety issue. Perhaps some signs in Apex Park
advertising the Train and details of how to access the Railway station could be placed
in the park suggesting an exit over the Potts Memorial Bridge and crossing the roadShire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 20
north of the bridge near the Garden Centre. The South side would be too dangerous
due to the intersection of Albany Highway and Broomehill Road.
2.3.2 through to 2.6 would be very achievable over time by following the suggestions made by
Helen.
2.7.1 – Where to Start
By having the rubbish bin in its current location works well as we never have a rubbish
problem near the station. Placing the Rubbish Bins in an attractive enclosure on the north
east corner of the station can be done immediately.
We are not too keen on lighting at the station on a nightly basis as well feel it may be an
invitation for un-desirables to hang around the station. We have outside lighting on a timer
when required.
We have a fridge for cold drinks and facilities for making coffee but would only provide food
on special occasions.
We suggest keeping the Toilets closed except for when the Train is running. KTR maintain,
clean the toilets and supply hand towel and toilet paper. If the Toilets were to be kept open
costs would fall back to the Shire. There are other public toilets in the vicinity at the park and
Kodja Place.
Page 51: Railway Station Building
We totally agree with removing or trimming the vegetation on the south of the
Station Building.
Wool Loading Ramp near the New Shed.
As the drawing on Page 40 show the Wool loading ramp is heritage listed and is
where we consider the ideal place for the Mens Shed. This area has been changed
over time and on viewing the Ramp it appears that the timber is much newer than
the ramp near the station with the crane. If we could get the area near the new shed
removed from the Heritage List. We could then dismantle the Wool Loading Ramp
and rebuild the ramp with the crane with the materials. Signage would then state
what was done.Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 21
12.2 REVISED LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS & LOCAL
RECOVERY PLAN
AUTHOR: Rob Cowie – Regulatory/Admin Officer
DATE: Friday, 9 June 2017
FILE NO: ES.POL.2
ATTACHMENT: 12.2.1 Local Emergency Management Arrangements
12.2.2 Local Recovery Plan
DECLARATION OF INTERST
Nil.
SUMMARY
The Shire of Kojonup is required to have Local Emergency Arrangements and Recovery
Plans. Our current plans were last updated in 2011.
BACKGROUND
The Shire’s current ‘Arrangements’ are non-compliant as they have not been reviewed within
the five (5) year timeframe. The Shire is bound by legislation to have these documents and
to review and update them regularly.
COMMENT
The revised plans require Council to adopt the updated and revised Local Emergency
Management Arrangements so they can be submitted to the State Emergency Management
Committee for endorsement. It is recommended that Council adopt these revised Local
Emergency Management Arrangements and the Local Recovery Plan for the Kojonup Shire.
CONSULTATION
Extensive consultation with Local Emergency Management Committee (LEMC) and Shire
Senior Management.
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
The Emergency Management Act 2005 section 41 – 43, sets out the local government’s
responsibilities regarding emergency management arrangements;
S.41 Emergency management arrangements in local government district
(1) A local government is to ensure that arrangements (local emergency
management arrangements) for emergency management in the local government’s
district are prepared.
(2) The local emergency management arrangements are to set out —
(a) the local government’s policies for emergency management;
(b) the roles and responsibilities of public authorities and other persons
involved in emergency management in the local government district;
(c) provisions about the coordination of emergency operations and
activities relating to emergency management performed by the persons
mentioned in paragraph (b);
(d) a description of emergencies that are likely to occur in the local
government district;
(e) strategies and priorities for emergency management in the local
government district;
(f) other matters about emergency management in the local government
district prescribed by the regulations; andShire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 22
(g) other matters about emergency management in the local government
district the local government considers appropriate.
(3) Local emergency management arrangements are to be consistent with the
State emergency management policies and State emergency management plans.
(4) Local emergency management arrangements are to include a recovery plan
and the nomination of a local recovery coordinator.
(5) A local government is to deliver a copy of its local emergency management
arrangements, and any amendment to the arrangements, to the SEMC as soon as is
practicable after they are prepared.
42. Reviewing and renewing local emergency management arrangements
(1) A local government is to ensure that its local emergency management
arrangements are reviewed in accordance with the procedures established by the
SEMC.
(2) Local emergency management arrangements may be amended or replaced
whenever the local government considers it appropriate.
43. Local emergency management arrangements to be available for inspection
(1) A local government is to keep a copy of its local emergency management
arrangements at the offices of the local government.
(2) The arrangements are to be available for inspection, free of charge, by
members of the public during office hours.
(3) The arrangements may be made available in written or electronic form.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Whilst there is no financial implications to endorse the Arrangements or Recovery Plan,
Council are responsible for some expenses incurred during an emergency.
STRATEGIC/CORPORATE IMPLICATIONS
Community Strategic Plan 2013 – 2023
Outcomes:
N2 – Living in a safe community.
Corporate Business Plan 2013 – 2017
Objectives:
N2.4 – Maintain Community Safety
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
As per objective on pages 34 and 35 of the Risk Management Plan: To ensure the Emergency
Management System is robust, communicated and tested and; To review Shire Business
Continuity / Community Emergency Recovery Arrangements
ASSET MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
SOUTHERN LINK VROC (VOLUNTARY REGIONAL ORGANISATION OF
COUNCILS) IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS
Simple MajorityShire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 23
3:17pm – the Member of the Gallery (Mrs Boys) departed from the Chamber.
COUNCIL DECISION/OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
62/17 Moved Cr Sexton, seconded Cr Radford that Council adopts the 2017 Local
Emergency Management Arrangements and the Local Recovery Plan as
presented.
CARRIED 6/0Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 24
12.3 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FOR NEW SINGLE DWELLING ON LOT
6103 FOLEY ROAD, QUALEUP
AUTHOR: Phil Shephard – Town Planner
DATE: Monday, 12 June 2017
FILE NO: A21957
ATTACHMENTS: 12.3 Site Plan, Floor Plan, Elevation, BAL Certificate
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
Nil.
SUMMARY
To consider an application for development approval to construct a new single-storey
dwelling on the above property as shown on the attached plans.
Council approval is required as:
The site of the new dwelling is contained within the bush fire prone areas mapped by
the Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES); and
There is an existing dwelling on the property and Town Planning Scheme No. 3 (TPS3)
restricts residential uses to only 1 single dwelling per lot in the Rural zone.
The recommendation is to grant development approval subject to conditions.
BACKGROUND
Nil.
COMMENT
Proposal
The proponents wish to construct a new dwelling on the property. The new dwelling will be
single-storey and approximately 295m² in area with concrete floor, steel frame construction
and clad with “surfmist” painted metal sheeting for the walls and “zincalume” metal sheeting
for the roof. It will utilise an on-site water supply and method of effluent disposal.
The applicant advises they will demolish the existing old dwelling when the new dwelling is
completed, which will comply with the TPS3 requirement of one dwelling per rural lot.
The lot has frontage and access to Foley Road which is maintained by the Shire. There are
no changes to the access proposed in the application.
The site of the dwellings is shown in the image below.Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 25
Dwelling
site
Aerial image showing Lot 6103 Foley Road and dwelling site (Image Google Earth)
Zoning and Land Use/Development
The land is zoned Rural under TPS3 and the following objectives apply to the zone:
a) The zone shall consist of predominantly rural uses.
b) To protect land from urban uses that may jeopardise the future use of that land for
other planned purposes which are compatible with the zoning.
c) To protect the land from closer development which would detract from the rural
character and amenity of the area.
d) To prevent any development which may affect the viability of a holding.
e) To provide for limited commercial accommodation opportunities in a rural
environment consistent with the Council’s Policy for ‘Farmstay’, ‘Bed and Breakfast
Accommodation’ and ‘Chalet’ facilities.
The proposal is considered to be consistent with these objectives.
TPS3 requires the development of a dwelling in the Rural zone achieve the following
setbacks:
Setback Minimum Comment
Distance
Front 20m Proposal achieves 200m
Side 10m Proposal achieves 540m to the western side boundary and
over 900m to the eastern side boundary
Rear 10m Proposal achieves over 650m to rear boundary
Bushfire Planning
The applicant has submitted a Bushfire Attack Level (BAL) Report/Certificate advising the
site has a BAL of 12.5 which advises the dwelling is most likely to be subject to ember attack
during a bush fire.
The dwelling is considered to be a habitable building (Class 1A) and is required to complyShire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 26
with SPP 3.7 Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas and AS3959 Construction of buildings in
bushfire-prone areas. The construction of the dwelling will need to comply with the
requirements of AS3959 which will be addressed through the Building Permit process.
Matters to be considered
The Scheme (c.6.3.2) requires the Council have regard to a number of relevant matters which
are discussed below in considering whether to approve/refuse the application.
Matter to be Considered Response
(a) the aims and provisions of this The proposed development of the new
Scheme and any other local planning dwelling and subsequent demolition of the
scheme operating within the Scheme old dwelling is considered consistent with the
area; aims and provisions of TPS3 for the
development of rural zoned land.
(b) the requirements of orderly and The proposed development is consistent with
proper planning including any the orderly and proper planning of the area.
proposed local planning scheme or
amendment to this Scheme that has
been advertised under the Planning
and Development (Local Planning
Schemes) Regulations 2015 or any
other proposed planning instrument
that the local government is seriously
considering adopting or approving;
(c) any approved State planning policy; The proposed development is consistent with
the aims and provisions of the following SPP:
3.7 Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas
(m) the compatibility of the development The proposed developments are consistent
with its setting including the with other dwellings in the locality. The
relationship of the development to setbacks, height, bulk and scale are also
development on adjoining land or on consistent with other buildings in the zone.
other land in the locality including,
but not limited to, the likely effect of
the height, bulk, scale, orientation
and appearance of the development;
(n) the amenity of the locality including The proposal is not expected to have any
the following- negative impact on the amenity of the
(i) environmental impacts of the locality.
development;
(ii) the character of the locality;
(iii) social impacts of the
development;
(o) the likely effect of the development The proposal includes on-site water supply
on the natural environment or water and effluent disposal systems.
resources and any means that are
proposed to protect or to mitigate
impacts on the natural environment
or the water resource;
(p) whether adequate provision has been No clearing of any trees/shrubs is required
made for the landscaping of the land and no additional landscaping is considered
to which the application relates and necessary in this instance.
whether any trees or other vegetation
on the land should be preserved;Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 27
Matter to be Considered Response
(q) the suitability of the land for the Except bush fire risk, the dwelling site is not
development taking into account the known to be affected by any natural hazard
possible risk of flooding, tidal including flood, subsidence, erosion etc.
inundation, subsidence, landslip,
bush fire, soil erosion, land
degradation or any other risk;
(s) the adequacy of - No changes to the existing access/egress are
(i) the proposed means of access to proposed in the application.
and egress from the site; and
(ii) arrangements for the loading,
unloading, manoeuvring and
parking of vehicles;
c.78E.(1) of the Planning and The site has a BAL of 12.5 and the
Development (Local Planning Schemes) construction of the dwelling will need to
Amendment Regulations 2015 comply with AS3959 through the Building
In considering an application for Permit process.
development approval for development to
which this Part applies, the local
government is to have regard to the
bushfire resistant construction
requirements of the Building Code.
The Council has a number of options available to it which are discussed below:
1 Not approve the proposal
The Council can choose to refuse to approve the proposal and advise the proponent
giving reasons. If this option was chosen, the new dwelling would not be able to be
constructed.
2 Approve the proposal
The Council can choose to approve the proposal, with or without conditions.
3 Defer the proposal
The Council can choose to defer the matter for a period of time and seek additional
information from the proponents, if deemed necessary to complete the assessment,
before proceeding to make a decision.
This is a discretionary decision and the applicant has a right to request a review of any
decision and/or condition made by the Local Government to the State Administrative
Tribunal if aggrieved by the decision and/or any condition.
CONSULTATION
Nil undertaken.
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Planning and Development Act 2005 and Planning and Development (Local Planning
Schemes) Regulations 2015 – the processing of a development application is required to
comply with the requirements of Town Planning Scheme No. 3 which is an operative local
planning scheme under the Act/Regulations.Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 28
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
There are no policies applying to this report.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The applicant is required to pay the development application fee of $480 as set out in the
adopted 2016/17 List of Fees and Charges.
STRATEGIC/CORPORATE IMPLICATIONS
Community Strategic Plan 2013 – 2023
E2 – Building Prosperity
Corporate Business Plan 2013 – 2017
E2.1 – Building local economic capacity to generate wealth and provide a variety of
local employment opportunities.
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
The item covers several risk areas to Council including strategy and planning, compliance
and reputation functions. The organisational risk and proposed treatment or mitigation is
summarised in the following table from the Shire’s Risk Management Plan:
Risk Description Risk Risk Risk Risk Treatment
Likelihood Consequence Classification
Council does not Unlikely Minor Low Risk acceptable with
approve the adequate controls,
proposed new managed by routine
dwelling procedures and
subject to annual
monitoring.
ASSET MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
SOUTHERN LINK VROC (VOLUNTARY REGIONAL ORGANISATION OF
COUNCILS) STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLICATIONS
The item is not covered in the Southern Link VROC Strategic Directions 2015-2020 plan.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS
Simple Majority
OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
That Council grant development approval for the new dwelling and subsequent demolition
of the existing dwelling on Lot 6103 Foley Road, Qualeup subject to the following
conditions:
1) The development to be in generally in accordance with the stamped approved plans,
unless a variation has been approved by the Chief Executive Officer.
2) The dwelling to be connected to an approved on-site water supply and effluent disposal
system to the satisfaction of the Shire’s Building Surveyor and Environmental Health
Officer.
3) Within six months of the occupation of the new dwelling (notice of completion BA7
submitted by the Builder) the demolition of the existing dwelling shall comply with the
directions of the Shire of Kojonup Environmental Health Officer including obtaining
a demolition permit and decommissioning the on-site effluent disposal system.Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 29
Advice Notes:
1) You are required to obtain a Building Permit prior to any construction activity
commencing and/or Demolition Permit prior to any demolition activity commencing;
and
2) Your dwelling site has been designated with a Bushfire Attack Level (BAL) of 12.5 and
certain construction requirements will apply to the new dwelling to comply with AS
3959 Construction of buildings in bushfire prone areas.
COUNCIL DECISION
63/17 Moved Cr Fleay, seconded Cr Radford that Council grant development
approval for the new dwelling and subsequent demolition of the existing
dwelling on Lot 6103 Foley Road, Qualeup subject to the following conditions:
1) The development to be in generally in accordance with the stamped
approved plans, unless a variation has been approved by the Chief
Executive Officer.
2) The dwelling to be connected to an approved on-site water supply and
effluent disposal system to the satisfaction of the Shire’s Building
Surveyor and Environmental Health Officer.
3) The demolition of the existing dwelling shall comply with the directions
of the Shire of Kojonup Environmental Health Officer including
obtaining a demolition permit and decommissioning the on-site effluent
disposal system.
Advice Notes:
1) You are required to obtain a Building Permit prior to any construction
activity commencing and/or Demolition Permit prior to any demolition
activity commencing; and
2) Your dwelling site has been designated with a Bushfire Attack Level (BAL)
of 12.5 and certain construction requirements will apply to the new
dwelling to comply with AS 3959 Construction of buildings in bushfire
prone areas.
CARRIED 6/0
REASON FOR CHANGE: Council did not wish to impose a set time limit for the demolition
of the existing dwelling as they felt it was up to the applicant to organise this within a
timeframe that is suitable for them.Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 30
13 EXECUTIVE & GOVERNANCE REPORTS
Nil.
14 AGED CARE SERVICES REPORTS
Nil
15 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & TOURISM REPORTS
NilShire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 31
16 COMMITTEES OF COUNCIL
16.1 NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AUTHOR: Rick Mitchell-Collins
DATE: 13 June 2017
FILE NO: GO.CNM.9
ATTACHMENT: 16.1 Natural Resource Management Advisory Committee
Unconfirmed Minutes for 11 May 2017
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
Nil
SUMMARY
The Natural Resource Management Advisory Committee (NRMAC) has submitted minutes
of its meeting held 11 May 2017 and has made a number of recommendations for Councils
consideration which requires some additional comment prior to Council making a
determination.
BACKGROUND
The Terms of Reference for the NRMAC state:
1. Terms of Reference
To establish a cooperative partnership arrangement whereby Natural Resource Management
(NRM) and Community values complement the strategic objectives of attracting research,
developing and extending opportunities that enhance economic, environmental, cultural and
social outcomes within the Shire and our neighbours.
2. Aims and Objectives
To work collaboratively with the community under the following five (5) main areas:
i. Economy, Community and Environment
Develop an NRM strategy for the Shire of Kojonup based on natural asset condition and
management driven by the triple bottom line approach.
ii. Stewardship and Partnerships
Undertake or ensure Environmental planning, policies and activities protect and
preserve environmental assets, reserves and ecology within Kojonup's natural and
agricultural ecosystems.
iii. Collaboration and Capacity Building
Actively participate and promote sustainable NRM including education, research and
policy development programs, on ground projects, and funding opportunities.
iv. Innovation and Education
Increase awareness of the implications of climate change and develop management
actions for the Shire, primary producers and local businesses to create opportunities.
v. Leadership and Responsibility
Develop and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Shire activities to
improve the Environmental performance of the organisation.
3. Initial Projects
o Develop and implement a sustainable Bridal Creeper and Tagasaste Eradication
program.
o Assist Council progress the sustainable management of water resources including water
harvesting and re-use opportunities in the Shire.Shire of Kojonup – Ordinary Council Meeting – Minutes – 20 June 2017 32
o Coordinate weed management and planting of native trees and shrubs to improve bio
diversity, fauna habitat and natural resource management outcomes in conjunction with
Schools, Kojonup Aboriginal Corporation and community groups within identified
Reserves such as:
a) Myrtle Benn, Farrar and Quin Quin;
b) Showground’s area; and
c) Blackwood Road arboretum.
COMMENT
The NRMAC is an advisory committee of Council but this should not preclude committee
members from volunteering to undertake various projects that have received the prior
approval of Council.
Such Council approval taking into consideration an adopted budget allocation which has
listed various prioritized projects, events, activities and the amount of human resources,
plant, machinery, chemicals, materials, administrative (property access approvals),
governance etc., required which may/may not be supported financially from external grants
or other funding sources.
At its meeting held 11 May 2017 the NRM Advisory Committee made a number of decisions
as follows which will require further discussion with Council:
COMMITTEE DECISION 11/17
That the NRM/Landcare Officer’s report on the Management of Shire Reserves
Community Forum be noted and that the Council be requested to approve the
commencement of the Reserve Management Planning by the formation of a sub-
committee (with administration support provided by the NRM/Landcare Officer)
consisting of one member from the:
• Shire (Marina Murray)
• Natural Resources Management Advisory Committee (Frank Pritchard)
• Kojonup Bush Fire Advisory Committee (Robert Sexton)
• Friends of Myrtle Benn Group
• Kojonup Weed Action Group (Graham Blacklock)
COMMITTEE DECISION 13/17
That the NRM/Landcare Officer’s report on the Blackwood Basin Group’s
Kojonup Strategy Workshop be noted and the Natural Resource Management
Advisory Committee seek Council’s inclusion of the Landcare goal as follows in
the Advisory Committee’s Terms of Reference:
• Improve biosecurity by managing floral and faunal pests.
COMMITTEE DECISION 14/17
That the NRM/Landcare Officer’s report on South West Catchments Council
(SWCC) Project GW.GWS13.SK – Myrtle Benn Flora & Fauna Sanctuary
Assessment be noted and the Natural Resource Management Advisory Committee
seek Council’s approval to allocate funds and resources to assist in achieving the
recommendations as follows:
• Conduct fox baiting during March or Spring;
• Conduct rabbit baiting in March if required;
• Monitor any kangaroos;
• Remove or spray Tagasaste populations around the old rubbish tip site;
• Rehabilitate the rubbish tip;
• Pick up the rubbish found in the reserve;You can also read
