Michelle Y. Merrill Environment and Sustainability Research Cluster Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 21 23 October 2015 International ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Michelle Y. Merrill Environment and Sustainability Research Cluster Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 2123 October 2015 International Greening Education Event Karlsruhe, Germany
Overview • Intro: terms and rationale • Building Communities of Practice • A case study of the Education for Sustainability in Asia Community of Practice
Why Higher Education for Sustainability? “It is worth noting that this is not the work of ignorant people. Rather, it is largely the results of work by people with BAs, BSs, LLBs, MBAs, and PhDs.” David Orr, Earth in Mind, 1994, p. 7
Bangladesh Brunei Cambodia China India Indonesia Japan Laos Malaysia Myanmar/Burma Philippines Singapore South Korea Taiwan Thailand Vietnam Map by www.presentationmagazine.com
Why Asia? Map by www.presentationmagazine.com
Education for Sustainability (EfS) matters here… http://i.imgur.com/MWnlkbo.jpg
% of 2534 year olds with tertiary education by 2020 http://www.oecd.org/edu/50495363.pdf
Why a Community of Practice? A Community of The CoP is a model that Practice (CoP) helps can be applied to practitioners learn communities of together how to learners, including in improve their practice the classroom
How do you build a Community of Practice?
Wenger Domain, Practice, Community eps644.wikispaces.com
“…a community of practice acts as a locally negotiated regime of competence.” Wenger 1998, p137
Constituents of a Community of Practice (CoP) Joint Enterprise Mutual Shared Engagement Repertoire (Wenger 1998)
Joint Enterprise • Negotiated meanings and communal responses to shared goal/task • Needs surprises, divergence and conviviality Joint Enterprise mycelium.is
Mutual Engagement Dense and complex interaction of both working and sociocultural activities Mutual Engagement susievickery.com
Shared repertoire “routines, words, tools, ways of doing things, stories, gestures, symbols, genres, actions or concepts that the community has adapted in the course of its existence” (Wenger, 1998, p. 83) Shared Repertoire changeyourvibe.co.nz
Diversity for a Dynamic Learning Community blog.latism.org
Varied levels of participation (Wenger, McDermott, Snyder 2002)
CoP Stages of Development Established CoP acts as steward CoP forms an of domain identity The CoP has outlived its Members usefulness , Loose come together Stewardship people move on network Maturing Legacy Coalescing Potential Set standards, Sustain energy, Find value in define renew interest, Let go, Discover engaging and agenda, deal educate define a common learning with growth novices, gain legacy, keep ground influence in touch from Wenger (http://partnership.esflive.eu/files/CoP_development_stages.pdf/)
How are we doing it? A case study of the EfS Asia CoP
NTU Conferences PostSecondary Sustainability in Education for Bridging Sustainability in Education: Pedagogical Sustainability in Asia: Research to Pedagogy: Curricula, Case Studies Themes and Practices in and Community Theory and Practice Asian Countries Building 19 – 20 April 2013 27 – 28 February 2014 56 February 2015
Website http://bit.do/EfSAsia
Grant Newsletters Applications Webinar/ Edited Book Online Chat Linked-In Collaborate Group on Research
How well is it working?
Key Questions (from ‘StepbyStep Guide for Designing and Cultivating Communities of Practice ‘ Cambridge, Kaplan and Suter 2005) 1. Foundation: Build Relationships • How regularly are members interacting? • To what extent do interactions have continuity and depth? • Are members “opportunistic” about chances to interact in other settings (conferences, etc.)? • Are members taking on new leadership roles? • How much and what kind of reciprocity is occurring? • To what extent is a shared understanding of the community’s domain and approach to practice beginning to emerge?
Key Questions (from Cambridge, Kaplan and Suter 2005) 2. Learn and Develop the Practice • How rich and accessible are the community’s knowledge representations for existing practice? • To what extent does community design support deeper learning for community members? 3. Take Action as a Community • Are collaborative efforts beginning to emerge naturally? • Are there community structures to support volunteering for projects and working with others?
Key Questions (from from ‘StepbyStep Guide for Designing and Cultivating Communities of Practice ‘ Cambridge, Kaplan and Suter 2005) 4. Create Knowledge in the Domain • To what extent is the community influential in its domain? • Are community members being invited, as community members, to present on leadingedge ideas? Totals
What could the EfS Asia CoP do better? • Bring more into the core • Ensure sustainability of the community through new/additional leadership (will it thrive if I go?) • “[create] a predictable “rhythm” that sets an expectation around how and when to participate in the community” (Cambridge, Kaplan and Suter 2005, p.2) • more social media (expertise & time) • articulate purpose and benefits to participants
What’s next? smaller scale larger scale core project
Inside NTU: smaller scale Scholarship of Teaching and Learning CoP
talloiresnetwork.tufts.edu aashe.org … are NOT Communities of Practice (though they may contain and support CoPs) prospernet.ias.unu.edu copernicusalliance.org
Research Project: • Multisited study to document and compare EfS pedagogies at Southeast Asian universities • PI and CoPIs at NTU, Collaborators from 7 other countries • Discover, develop and disseminate innovations in EfS • Develop online repository for EfS in higher education in Asia
How can we connect with, learn from and teach each other, so together we can cocreate sustainable, resilient cultures? http://bit.do/EfSAsia mmerrill@ntu.edu.sg perplexedprimate@gmail.com Skype: michelle.y.merrill michelleyvonnemerrill.com
You can also read