MAKING A CASE FOR CORE LENDING - MARCH 2022 - USAA Real Estate

Page created by Maurice Higgins
 
CONTINUE READING
MAKING A CASE FOR CORE LENDING - MARCH 2022 - USAA Real Estate
MAKING A CASE
FOR CORE LENDING
MARCH 2022
MAKING A CASE FOR CORE LENDING - MARCH 2022 - USAA Real Estate
The Opportunity
              The commercial real estate (CRE) debt market has over $5.0 trillion in loans outstanding (Exhibit 1), making it one of
              the largest fixed income asset classes, offering investors a vast array of products and strategies.1 The asset class
              combines many of the attractions offered by both commercial real estate equity and fixed income; this
              includes stable, historically strong income returns while maintaining a level of downside protection
              from real asset exposure and enhanced diversification potential. This paper will focus on the strong historical
              risk-adjusted performance of CRE debt, highlighting why the current market environment is favorable for investors.

                    EXHIBIT 1: Comparison of U.S. Fixed-Income Investment Asset Classes by Estimated Market Size, Q3 2021
              $ Trillions
              25

              20

              15

              10

                5

               –
                       Publicly-Held          Residential Mortgage U.S. Corporate                        Commercial Real   Municipal Bonds    Leveraged
                       Treasury Debt           Backed Securities                                           Estate Debt                       Loan Market
              Source: Sifma, Federal Reserve Flow of Funds, , USAA Real Estate Research. As of Q3 2021

1. Federal Reserve Flow of Funds, Q3 2021. Note - not including debt funds                                                       USAA REAL ESTATE   |   CORE LENDING   1
MAKING A CASE FOR CORE LENDING - MARCH 2022 - USAA Real Estate
Private CRE debt investment can be categorized into two broad
categories: private CRE mortgages and subordinated debt, both secured
by the underlying property. Senior Private CRE mortgage holders have
priority, as well as certain bankruptcy protections over those holding
subordinated debt in the event of a default (Exhibit 2). Senior lending
carries lower risk than other real estate debt sources given
its senior position in the capital stack. However, loan structure,
property type, duration, a sponsor’s business plan, and loan-to-value
(LTV) are also important characteristics when evaluating risk and return.

                              EXHIBIT 2: Real Estate Capital Stack (Loan-to-Value)
 HIGH
                                                     EQUITY   90 – 100 %
                                                                                          EQUITY
                                          PREFERRED EQUITY 80 – 90 %

                                   B NOTE / MEZZANINE LOAN * 65 – 80 %
    POTENTIAL RISK & RETURN

                                                                                          DEBT

                                                 SENIOR LOAN    0 – 65 %

 LOW
Source: USAA Real Estate Research. As of January 2022                      *Types of subordinated debt.

Investors have become selective, choosing certain asset classes over others and focusing on quality assets in terms
of location, tenant covenants, and Environmental, Social and Governance criteria (ESG). U.S. CRE debt has been
increasingly sought after by pension funds, insurance companies, and other institutional investors, and the arguments
for including real estate in private-debt allocations appear to be strong. Senior mortgage lending strategies are
attractive because they potentially provide substantially more return than traditional fixed income in the
current environment, while likely taking materially less risk due to downside protection from real asset
exposure and seniority in the capital stack in relation to the equity position, thus offering favorable risk-
adjusted returns. This segment of the market has historically been dominated by large banks, commercial mortgage-
backed securities (CMBS) and life insurance companies that value the low volatility, high income relative to corporate
bonds, and liability matching qualities provided. However, an increasing number of investors are realizing this asset
class, particularly in the lower risk credit strategies, can be an accretive part of investment portfolios.

                                                                                                          USAA REAL ESTATE   |   CORE LENDING   2
MAKING A CASE FOR CORE LENDING - MARCH 2022 - USAA Real Estate
Why Now?
              LINGERING CREDIT CONSTRAINTS
              The investment opportunity is ripe due to the size of the market in the U.S. for senior secured mortgages; transaction
              volumes averaged $530 billion annually since 2015, plus over $5 trillion in outstanding mortgages, a fair percentage of
              which need to be refinanced each year.2 In general, providers of capital to this space are more constrained
              than in the past due to the regulatory environment. Regulations imposed by Dodd-Frank and Basel III have
              created a more risk-averse lending environment at the balance sheet level and within the securitization markets.

2. Real Capital Analytics (only includes Apartment, Industrial, Offices, Retail, Hotel, Senior Housing, Land),
   Federal Reserve Flow of Funds, Q3 2021. Note - not including debt funds                                       USAA REAL ESTATE   |   CORE LENDING   3
MAKING A CASE FOR CORE LENDING - MARCH 2022 - USAA Real Estate
Broadly, the COVID-19 pandemic created an
                                                                                                 economic setback that led traditional sources
                                                                                                 of debt capital to retrench during the early
                                                                                                 stages of the pandemic, and while most
                                                                                                 have returned to nearly normal activity, loan
                                                                                                 proceeds can be constrained as compared
                                                                                                 to pre-COVID. Lending standards tightened
                                                                                                 dramatically in 2020, as banks responded
                                                                                                 to the uncertain economic outlook. As
                                                                                                 demonstrated by the Federal Reserve Senior
                                                                                                 Loan Officer Survey (see Exhibit 3), the
                                                                                                 percentage of banks tightening lending
                                                                                                 standards reached levels not seen since
                                                                                                 the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). Lending
                                                                                                 standards have started to loosen in
                                                                                                 recent quarters but remain constrained.

                                                    EXHIBIT 3: Stricter Bank Lending Standards
% Net Tightening & Net Stronger Demand
100

 80

 60

 40

 20

   0

-20

-40

-60

-80
       '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20 '21

                                                     % Tightening Standards                    Stronger Demand

Source: Federal Reserve Senior Loan Officer Survey, USAA Real Estate Research. As of Q4 2021

                                                                                                                 USAA REAL ESTATE   |   CORE LENDING   4
MAKING A CASE FOR CORE LENDING - MARCH 2022 - USAA Real Estate
CMBS ORIGINATION REMAINS VOLATILE
            The CMBS market, which has historically served as an alternative
            capital source, remains volatile. CMBS originators were hit
            particularly hard by the pandemic, capturing only 1% of total
            commercial mortgage origination in Q2 2020. A year later in
            Q2 2021, these originators were responsible for 18% of all new
            commercial mortgages, a figure placing these groups just behind
            regional/local banks as the largest source of financing.3 In a sign of
            their more competitive pricing, CMBS loan origination in the first
            nine months of 2021 totaled $77.1 billion, well above 2020s year-to-
            date issuance of $40.7 billion.4 While CMBS originators have
            steadily regained market share, recent volatility reinforces
            the idea that alternative lenders are well-positioned to
            take advantage of CRE lending opportunities arising from
            dislocations in the capital markets going forward.

            CHANGES TO RISK-BASED CAPITAL CHARGES
            New risk-based capital charges could make CRE investments easier
            to access for life insurers. Recent changes to the risk-based
            capital (RBC) framework have significant implications for
            the capital efficiency of real estate investments within life
            insurance portfolios. The overall impact of the RBC changes at
            year-end 2021 will vary materially depending on an individual life
            insurer’s investment portfolio and liability profile. However, we
            expect both CRE equity and Commercial Mortgage Loans (CML)
            will look more attractive to domestic insurers on a capital adjusted
            yield basis given the material changes to RBC capital factors.
            CMLs look incrementally more compelling as capital charges did
            not change, while bond charges increased on balance.

            Reduced charges for CRE equity will potentially make it more
            attractive to domestic insurers. Whereas RBC charges were
            previously 15% for direct investments reported on Schedule A and
            23% for joint ventures and fund real estate investments reported
            on Schedule BA, the newly-adopted charges will be 11% and 13%,
            respectively.5 Importantly, the closing of the gap between Schedule
            A and Schedule BA RBC charges could make real estate investing
            via funds and joint ventures more attractive than previously.
            In light of these favorable changes, CRE equity and CMLs
            may become more of a consideration in life insurance
            strategic asset allocation frameworks going forward.

3. Real Capital Analytics, U.S. Capital Trends Big Picture, August 2021
4. CBRE, U.S. Lending Figures, Q3 2021
5. NAIC, Adopted Modifications to RBC Formula for Real Estate, June 2021             USAA REAL ESTATE   |   CORE LENDING   5
MAKING A CASE FOR CORE LENDING - MARCH 2022 - USAA Real Estate
FAVORABLE DEMAND DRIVERS
             Conditions are in place for the commercial mortgage industry to sustain high demand in the near term. Yields on
             government and corporate fixed-income securities remain low by historical standards. As a result, relative real
             estate valuations, as measured by the spread between fixed income securities and CRE lending rates, are above
             long-term historical averages (Exhibit 4). Elevated levels of federal debt support the view that fixed-income
             securities will remain low for a prolonged period and strengthen the case for increased allocations to
             CRE lending.

                                                     EXHIBIT 4: CRE Lending Spread Rates vs. Corporate Bonds
            Spread (BPs)
            200

            100

            –

            (100)

            (200)

            (300)
                     '00    '01    '02     '03    '04     '05     '06    '07    '08    '09      '10   '11   '12   '13   '14   '15    '16   '17   '18   '19    '20   '21

                                                                        vs. A Corporate                     Post-1999 Avg

             Source: Bloomberg, USAA Real Estate. As of Q3 2021

            Overall, commercial real estate fundamentals remain healthy. New deliveries have been well below long-run averages
            in the current cycle across nearly every major property sector (except multifamily), and while construction pipelines
            are beginning to accelerate, they are doing so at a measured pace and in response to improving demand. The
            NCREIF Property Index (NPI) gained 6.15% during the fourth quarter of 2021 and advanced 17.7% over the trailing 12
            months. Notably, all property sectors posted positive returns for the quarter.6 Capital flows have also improved
            substantially since the depths of 2020, with transaction activity increasing 88% from a year ago.7

            As monetary policy evolves, the impact on the economy and the commercial mortgage sector will depend mainly on
            when the Federal Reserve decides to raise interest rates. If the economy is growing at a healthy pace, then landlords
            can increase rents and Net Operating Income (NOI), improving debt service coverage ratios, which should benefit
            both lenders and borrowers. Of course, performance will vary by market and property type, but interest rates are
            likely to remain economically supportive in the near term. Therefore, the real estate sector should be able to absorb
            a modest rate increase without any significant adverse impact.

6. NCRIEF Property Index, as of Q4 2021
7. Real Capital Analytics, U.S. Capital Trends Big Picture, 2021 Note: Compares 2021 vs. 2020                                       USAA REAL ESTATE     |   CORE LENDING   6
MAKING A CASE FOR CORE LENDING - MARCH 2022 - USAA Real Estate
Merits of Senior
           Mortgage Lending
           RESILIENT ACROSS MARKET CYCLES
           Senior lending has benefited from historically low volatility, with very low
           default rates over the past 20 years. This is due primarily to the presence
           of capital protection and cashflow resilience, even during periods of market
           uncertainty. Conservative LTVs, averaging 64% since 1990, have provided a
           significant buffer against declining property values.8 The most severe price
           declines occurred during the GFC when core property values fell by 27%;
           however, the market has never experienced an aggregate loss in value of
           more than 30%.9 Disciplined levels of leverage will likely continue to
           result in very low levels of default, reinforcing the view that core
           CRE debt is resilient. The risk characteristics of core CRE debt are very
           favorable, providing downside protection backed by real assets, a significant
           equity cushion, and robust loan structures. Historically, core CRE debt has
           outperformed relative to other assets types. As shown in Exhibit 5, core CRE
           debt has offered attractive risk-adjusted return performance relative to other
           asset classes over the last 15 and 25 years based upon the Sharpe ratio.

                                                     EXHIBIT 5: Risk-Adjusted Returns Across Asset Classes
            Sharpe Ratio, Last 25 & 15 Years
            1.4

            1.2

            1.0

            0.8

            0.6

            0.4

            0.2

              –
                  Core CRE Debt           IG Corporate         Core CRE Equity     HY Corporate      S&P 500     REITs       MSCI EAFE

                                                                         Last 25 Years       Last 15 Years

           Source: Bloomberg, USAA Real Estate Research, As of Q3 2021

8. ACLI, Q3 2021
9. NCRIEF, Market Value Index                                                                                  USAA REAL ESTATE   |   CORE LENDING   7
MAKING A CASE FOR CORE LENDING - MARCH 2022 - USAA Real Estate
POWERFUL PORTFOLIO ENHANCEMENT
Senior secured mortgages can potentially provide powerful portfolio enhancement. Along with lower volatility and
higher returns, core real estate debt has historically had a low correlation with stocks and bonds (see Exhibit 6).
For fixed-income investors, this low correlation can add diversification benefits.

                 EXHIBIT 6: Low Correlations to Other Asset Classes — Correlation of Returns Since 2001
                                        U.S. AGGREGATE BONDS                        S&P 500      CORE REAL ESTATE       CORE REAL ESTATE DEBT
 U.S. Aggregate Bonds                                 1.00
 S&P 500                                             (0.26)                            1.00
 Core Real Estate                                    (0.18)                             0.12              1.00
 Core Real Estate Debt                                0.51                             0.04               0.02                   1.00

Source: Bloomberg, USAA Real Estate Research, as of Q3 2021

Core CRE debt also stands as a strong complement to core CRE equity strategies. An allocation to core CRE
debt in addition to core CRE equity may further enhance risk-adjusted mixed-asset portfolio returns.
Exhibit 7 illustrates the potential improvement in diversification that can occur by adding an allocation to core CRE
equity and core CRE debt to a hypothetical portfolio of stocks and bonds (Portfolio A). The 20-year return/risk ratio
for Portfolio B (5% allocation to CRE equity and core CRE debt) improves by 15% over Portfolio A (no real estate).
Over the entire historical period, Portfolio C (10% allocation to CRE equity and core CRE debt) demonstrates a higher
return/risk ratio than either of the other two portfolios. This theoretical framework demonstrates the diversification
benefits of commercial real estate exposure; however, institutional investors have recognized this asset class can be
accretive to performance and are increasing their allocations.

                               EXHIBIT 7: Allocations to CRE Debt Can Enhance Mixed Asset Portfolios
                                                                    PORTFOLIO A                PORTFOLIO B                 PORTFOLIO C
 Stocks                                                                   60%                      55%                         50%
 Bonds                                                                    40%                      35%                         30%
 Core CRE Equity                                                           0%                      5%                          10%
 Core CRE Debt                                                             0%                      5%                          10%

 RETURN/RISK RATIO
 10-Year                                                                   1.25                    1.32                        1.41
 20-Year                                                                   0.75                    0.81                        0.87

Source: Bloomberg, USAA Real Estate Research, As at Q3 2021. For illustrative purposes only.

                                                                                                                 USAA REAL ESTATE     |   CORE LENDING   8
MAKING A CASE FOR CORE LENDING - MARCH 2022 - USAA Real Estate
Conclusion
Commercial mortgages, particularly senior whole loans, have been increasingly sought after by investors, and the
arguments for including core CRE debt in allocations appear to be strong. Commercial mortgages are an attractive
investment option in today’s market environment where credit standards remain somewhat constrained, borrower
demand is high, and underlying real estate fundamentals are healthy. With banks and CMBS lenders struggling
to navigate the strict regulatory environment, a gap remains between borrower needs and credit availability.
Consequently, there remains an opportunity for alternative lenders to fill this void, create velocity, and capitalize
on the robust demand in the commercial lending sector. As with any investment opportunities, real estate lending
has a certain level of embedded risk. Even with such a strong CRE debt outlook, it is important to ensure sponsor
alignment. It is critical to invest with a qualified and experienced investment manager who can navigate the
opportunities within this sector.

                                                                                         USAA REAL ESTATE    |   CORE LENDING   9
Tim Stoner                                                                               Alex Rapoport
                             Managing Director, Capital Markets                                                       Executive Director, Capital Markets
                             tim.stoner@usrealco.com                                                                  alex.rapoport@usrealco.com

                             Will McIntosh, Ph.D                                                                      Karen Martinus
                             Global Head of Research                                                                  Senior Associate, Research
                             will.mcintosh@usrealco.com                                                               karen.martinus@usrealco.com

                             Mark Fitzgerald, CFA, CAIA
                             Executive Director, Research
                             mark.fitzgerald@usrealco.com

Important Disclosures
These materials represent the opinions and recommendations of the author(s) and are subject to change without
notice. USAA Real Estate, its affiliates and personnel may provide market commentary or advice that differs from
the recommendations contained herein. Certain information has been obtained from sources and third parties.
USAA Real Estate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of these materials or accept liability for loss
from their use. USAA Real Estate and its affiliates may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the
recommendations or views expressed herein. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account the individual circumstances or objectives of any
investor and are not intended as recommendations of particular investments or strategies to particular investors.
No determination has been made regarding the suitability of any investments or strategies for particular investors.

Research team staff may make or participate in investment decisions that vary from these recommendations and
views and may receive compensation based on the overall performance of the USAA Real Estate or its affiliates
or certain investment funds or products. USAA Real Estate and/or its affiliates or clients may be buying, selling,
or holding significant positions in investments referred to in this report.

USAA Real Estate                                     Tel: 210.641.8416
9830 Colonnade Blvd., Suite 600                      Web: www.usrealco.com
San Antonio, TX 78230
USA
USAA Real Estate                  Square Mile Capital
9830 Colonnade Blvd., Suite 600   350 Park Avenue, 15th Floor
San Antonio, TX 78230 USA         New York, NY 10022 USA
usrealco.com                      squaremilecapital.com
You can also read