LOCALIZING THE SDGS IN COLOMBIAN CITIES - TWITTER: @REDCOMOVAMOSCOL - #CÓMOVAMOS - SDSN TRENDS
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Cómo Vamos Cities Network ● Private and civil society partnership focused on the generation of reliable, comparable and trustworthy city-level data. ● Contribute to the development of more transparent and effective local governments and responsable, participative and informed citizenships. ● 16 programs around Colombia, gathering more than 35 municipalities, including 13 capital cities (Bogota, Medellin, Cali among others). ● 20 years of experience (1st program, Bogota 1998)
General objective Contribute to the localization of the SDGs in colombian cities through the design and development of a city- tailored toolkit for the priorization of 2030 urban targets and indicators, aggregated on a open data urban dashboard. *The project has been developed together with tgraduate students from the University of Columbia (SIPA)
Enabling environment 1. Context: 78% urban population, 80% GDP, System of cities (50 cities > 100K) 2. National policy and institutional framework (CONPES, White paper, 2018) 3. Multi-level governance: high levels of devolution, specially in planning. 4. Multi-stakeholder approach: active but not sufficient involvement with other actors. 5. Weakened national urban policy and weak linkages with other key agendas (Rural). 6. Robust subnational finance framework 7. Accountability: solid public and private initiatives (e.g. RCCV) *Based on UCLG and SDSN conceptual frameworks
Urban Alliance - 5 urban challenges • Contribution to the definition of a national urban policy aligned with the SDGs, the 2030 Agenda and other national priorities (e.g. Peace Process). • Identification of 78 “urban” targets and 2015 baseline for 13 cities. Poverty, informality and inequality Quality of education Climate action and urban resilience Sustainable and inclusive communities Citizen secutiry, peace and gender inequality
Urban Toolkit and Dashboard # 1 •Evaluation PHASES TYPE CATEGORIES IND./SDG aligned with 4 Localization year Local Govt. Tier 1 state Plans 1 Main indicator (National Level) (Methodology and data available) 1 Main indicator (National and subnational level) Tier 1 Phase 1 2 (2015-2020) Secondary indicators City •Goals, targets 2 Tier 1 (Subnational level) Performanc and indicators e Tier 2 New indicators 1+ (Methodology exists but data not (Subnational level - Flexible) widely available) Phase 2 Tier 2-3 5 New indicators (Subnational level) •Citizen (2021-2025) (Methodology in development) 3 participation, Phase 3 Tier 3 Citizenship awareness, 5 New indicators (Subnational level) (2026-2030) (Methodology in development) appropiation *Reference: Klopp (2017)
Urban Toolkit and Dashboard CONPES CONPES Meta Meta Mejor ciudad del Valores de Valores de ODS Nombre del Indicador Fuente Línea Base Meta CONPES Meta internacional Valores de ref. Disponibilidad ODS Proyectada grupo ref.2 ref.3 2015* a 2030 12 12.5 Tasa de reciclaje y nueva utilización de residuos sólidos Ciudatos 8,6% 17,9% X BID (mayor a 10%) X >10 5-10 7.5 7.5-3 54,75% 23,98% - 54,74% < 23,97% Disponible Se cuenta con un Se cuenta con un No se cuenta con 17 17.1 Existencia de presupuesto participativo BID Disponible esquema de esquema de esquemas de Observatorio de Transparencia y 17 17.1 Índice de Desempeño Fiscal OTyC 100-70 70-40 40-0 Disponible Corrupción 7
Recent achievements Selected as international Included in Colombia’s most Co-authors of Colombia’s 1st Included as part of Terridata best practice recent VNR Light Report
¡Gracias! Luis Hernán Sáenz National Coordinator RCCV- Colombia redcomovamos@gmail.com Facebook: /RedComoVamosCol Twitter: @redcomovamoscol www.redcomovamos.org Twitter: @redcomovamoscol - #CómoVamos
You can also read