JUST AS TALL ON TESTOSTERONE; A NEUTRAL TO POSITIVE EFFECT ON ADULT HEIGHT OF GNRHA AND TESTOSTERONE IN TRANS BOYS

Page created by Stephen Coleman
 
CONTINUE READING
JUST AS TALL ON TESTOSTERONE; A NEUTRAL TO POSITIVE EFFECT ON ADULT HEIGHT OF GNRHA AND TESTOSTERONE IN TRANS BOYS
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2023, 108, 414–421
https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgac571
Advance access publication 3 October 2022
Clinical Research Article

Just as Tall on Testosterone; a Neutral to Positive Effect
on Adult Height of GnRHa and Testosterone in Trans Boys
Lieve Anne Willemsen,1,2,3,* Lidewij Sophia Boogers,1,2,4,* Chantal Maria Wiepjes,1,2,4
Daniel Tatting Klink,5 Adrianus Sarinus Paulus van Trotsenburg,3,4 Martin den Heijer,1,2,4
and Sabine Elisabeth Hannema1,3,4

                                                                                                                                                                Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/2/414/6747528 by guest on 11 December 2023
1
  Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2
  Department of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
3
  Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
4
  Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, 1105 BK Amsterdam, the Netherlands
5
  Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen 9000, Belgium
Correspondence: Sabine Elisabeth Hannema, MD PhD, Department of Pediatrics, Section Endocrinology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam. Email: s.e.hannema@amsterdamumc.nl.
*Both authors contributed equally

Abstract
Context: Growth is an important topic for many transgender boys. However, few studies have investigated the impact of puberty suppression
(PS) and gender-affirming hormone treatment (GAHT) on growth and adult height.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of PS and GAHT on growth and adult height.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Specialized gender identity clinic.
Participants: A total of 146 transgender boys treated with GnRH analogues and testosterone who reached adult height.
Main outcome measures: Growth, bone age (BA), adult height, and difference between adult height and predicted adult height (PAH) and
midparental height.
Results: In those with BA ≤14 years at start (n = 61), a decrease in growth velocity and bone maturation during PS was followed by an increase
during GAHT. Adult height was 172.0 ± 6.9 cm; height SD score was similar to baseline (0.1; 95% CI, −0.2 to 0.4). Adult height was 3.9 ± 6.0 cm
above midparental height and 3.0 ± 3.6 cm above PAH at start of PS. A younger BA at start PS was associated with an adult height significantly
further above PAH.
Conclusion: During PS, growth decelerated followed by an acceleration during GAHT. Although adult height SD score was similar to baseline,
adult height was taller than predicted based on BA at baseline, especially in those who started treatment at a younger BA. It is reassuring that PS
and GAHT do not have a negative impact on adult height in transgender boys and might even lead to a slightly taller adult height, especially in those
who start at a younger age.
Key Words: growth, gender dysphoria, transgender, testosterone, adult height, puberty suppression, GnRHa
Abbreviations: ACOG, Amsterdam Cohort of Gender; BA, bone age; BMI, body mass index; CA, chronological age; CV, coefficient of variation; GAHT,
gender-affirming hormone treatment; GnRHa, GnHR analogue; IQR, interquartile range; LOQ, limit of quantification; PAH, predicted adult height; PS, puberty
suppression; SDS, SD score.

Gender dysphoria involves an incongruence between the ex­                           In transgender boys (female sex assigned at birth, male gen­
perienced gender and the sex assigned at birth (1). Medical                      der identity), GAHT consists of intramuscular or transdermal
treatment for adolescents consists of puberty suppression                        testosterone. This induces physical changes such as increased
(PS) and subsequent gender-affirming hormone treatment                           facial and body hair, increased muscle mass, and lowering of
(GAHT). PS with GnRH analogues (GnRHa) inhibits the                              the voice. Growth and predicted adult height are also topics of
development of undesired secondary sex characteristics                           interest during consultation. Because Dutch males reach a
and gives adolescents more time to explore their gender                          mean adult height 13.1 cm taller than Dutch females (2),
identity. If the gender-dysphoric feelings persist during the                    height is also considered a sex characteristic. When treatment
puberty-suppressive phase, GAHT may be initiated from                            is initiated before adult height has been reached, transgender
the age of approximately 16 years to induce development                          boys may ask how treatment will impact their growth and
of secondary sex characteristics congruent with the affirmed                     whether they will reach an adult height within the male popu­
gender (1).                                                                      lation range. However, although the impact of GnRHa and

Received: 27 July 2022. Editorial Decision: 28 September 2022. Corrected and Typeset: 9 November 2022
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered
or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2023, Vol. 108, No. 2                                                         415

GAHT on growth in transgender girls has recently been eval­         Treatment Protocol
uated (3), the effect on growth in transgender boys is still        Adolescents were diagnosed with gender dysphoria by mental
unknown.                                                            health professionals according to the criteria of the Diagnostic
   The limited data available in transgender boys solely describe   and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth and later
the effects of GnRHa on growth. Several studies have observed       Fifth Edition (10, 11). All individuals received PS for at least 6
a decrease in height SD score (SDS) (4–6). Furthermore, it re­      months followed by GAHT from the age of 15 to 16 years. PS
mains unclear whether testosterone can induce catchup growth        consisted of GnRHa (triptorelin 3.75 mg every 4 weeks sub­
and reverse the changes in height SDS that occur during             cutaneously or IM; or 11.25 mg every 10 to 12 weeks intra­
GnRHa treatment.                                                    muscularly). GAHT consisted of intramuscular testosterone
   The timing of treatment initiation might also play a role in     injections with a starting dose of 25 mg/m2every 2 weeks.
the effects on growth. It has been suggested that treatment         As described in the Endocrine Society Guidelines, the dosage
with PS and GAHT might have a negative impact on adult              was gradually increased every 6 months leading up to an adult
height (7). Therefore, some clinicians argue that postponing        dose of 125 mg every 2 weeks or 250 mg every 3 to 4 weeks
treatment with GnRHa until growth is (nearly) finished may          (1). If transgender boys had (nearly) completed endogenous

                                                                                                                                         Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/2/414/6747528 by guest on 11 December 2023
result in a taller adult height. This poses a dilemma for young     puberty before the start of treatment, the testosterone dose
transgender boys between achieving maximal growth and pre­          was increased more rapidly, starting with 75 mg every 2 weeks
venting the development of unwanted secondary sex charac­           which was increased to 125 mg every 2 weeks after 6 months.
teristics such as breast development. The latter may give           Treatments were individualized by treating clinicians. Before
great distress because of the need to wear binders for several      2014, subjects were treated with GnRHa until gonadectomy,
years and the wish to undergo a mastectomy (8).                     which nearly all individuals chose to undergo because this was
   Another hypothesis is that the effect of testosterone on         required before a legal sex change was possible. After a law
growth is dose dependent. Rapid increase of the testosterone        change in 2014, it became more common to leave the ovaries
dose may cause rapid acceleration of bone maturation, there­        in situ. Thereafter, the protocol was adapted and GnRHa was
by shortening the period of growth. This may compromise             discontinued when an adult dose of testosterone was reached.
adult height. In contrast, a more gradual increase of testoster­
one dosage may induce an increase in growth rate during a
                                                                    Measurements
longer period, leading to an increased adult height, which is
why a different dose schedule is proposed for adolescents           Height and weight were assessed every 3 to 6 months from start
that have and have not finished linear growth (1). However,         of PS. Height was measured using a wall-mounted stadiometer,
the effects of different testosterone dose schedules on growth      and weight was measured using a digital floor scale. Height SDS
and adult height in transgender adolescents have not been           was calculated according to Dutch reference data from
studied.                                                            Schönbeck et al. (2) and BMI SDS was calculated according
   With this cohort study, we aim to evaluate the effect of         to reference data from Cole et al. (12). Midparental height
GnRHa and testosterone treatment on growth in transgender           was calculated using the following formula: Midparental
boys. Furthermore, the impact of timing of treatment, tempo         height = (paternal height + maternal height)/2 – 6.5 (13). BA
of dose increase, and body mass index (BMI) will be investi­        was determined at start of PS and at start of GAHT by evaluat­
gated. We hypothesize that PS will result in a decrease of          ing X-rays of the left hand using female reference data from the
growth velocity and GAHT will result in subsequent catchup          Greulich and Pyle atlas (14). Predicted adult height (PAH) was
growth that may be greater when the testosterone dose is            determined using the female prediction tables according to
slowly increased. Additionally, we expect these effects to be       Bayley and Pinneau (15). Parental height and BA were not rou­
larger in subjects with a younger bone age (BA) at the start        tinely obtained in individuals in whom it was clinically obvious
of PS.                                                              that they had attained their adult height.

                                                                    Laboratory Investigations
Materials and Methods
                                                                    To determine serum testosterone levels, a competitive im­
Subjects                                                            munoassay (Architect, Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) was
This study is part of the Amsterdam Cohort of Gender dys­           used (interassay coefficient of variation [CV] 6%-10%, lower
phoria (ACOG) study which includes the complete population          limit of quantification [LOQ] 0.1 nmol/L) from January 2013.
of all ages seen at the gender identity clinic of the Amsterdam     Serum estradiol levels were measured using liquid chromatog­
University Medical Center, location VUmc from 1972 until            raphy–tandem mass spectrometry (VUmc) with an interassay
December 2018 (9). Transgender boys were eligible for inclu­        coefficient of variation of 7% and an LOQ of 20 pmol/L from
sion if they had started PS before age 16 years, received testos­   July 2014. All values ≤20 pmol/L were entered as 20 pmol/L.
terone treatment for a minimum of 6 months, and if they had         Serum testosterone and estradiol levels from before these dates
reached the age of 18 years at the time of data collection.         were converted to Architect and liquid chromatography–tan­
Transgender boys were excluded if they had not reached adult        dem mass spectrometry values respectively as described by
height defined as height at skeletal age ≥14 years or a growth      Wiepjes et al (16). From April 2012, the chemiluminescence
velocity
416                                                                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2023, Vol. 108, No. 2

immunometric assay (Architect, Abbott) was used (interassay                 at start PS. Height SDS at start GAHT was compared between
CV 14 years at start of PS)                              The protocol for data collection for the ACOG dataset was as­
                                                                            sessed by the local medical ethical committee who determined
Characteristic                Pubertal      Postpubertal   Total            that the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act did
                              group         group          (n = 146)        not apply to this data collection. The need for informed con­
                              (n = 61)      (n = 85)                        sent was waived because of the retrospective design of the
                                                                            study and the size of the cohort.
Age at start PS (y)           12.7 ± 1.0    15.1 ± 0.9     14.1 ± 1.5
Height at start of PS (cm)    158.3 ± 8.5   166.4 ± 6.7    162.9 ± 8.5
  Missing                     0 (0)         4 (5)          4 (3)
                                                                            Results
BMI at start of PS            18.8 ± 2.4    22.4 ± 3.8     20.4 ± 3.6       The ACOG dataset consisted of 8831 individuals, 3481 of
  Missing                     0 (0)         33 (39)        33 (23)          whom were assigned female at birth and of whom 1320 had
                                                                            their first appointment before the age of 18 years. After selec­
BMI SDS at start of PS        0.3 ± 1.1     0.9 ± 1.1      0.6 ± 1.1
                                                                            tion for GnRHa use (n = 693), testosterone use (n = 533), age
  Missing                     0 (0)         33 (39)        33 (23)          ≥18 years at last visit from which data were available (397),
Bone age at start of PS (y)   12.4 ± 1.0    15.7 ± 1.1     13.7 ± 1.9       GnRHa initiation before the age of 16 years (148), exclusion
  Missing                     5 (8)         48 (56)        53 (36)          of 1 subject who had not reached adult height, and 1 subject
PAH at start of PS (cm)       169.0 ± 7.6   167.3 ± 6.8    168.3 ± 7.3      who was treated with oxandrolone, a total of 146 transgender
  Missing                     5 (8)         48 (56)        53 (36)          boys were included.
Midparental height (cm)       168.1 ± 6.2   166.4 ± 5.7    167.2 ± 6.0
  Missing                     5 (8)         26 (31)        31 (21)          Baseline Characteristics
Tanner breast stage at                                                      The study population (n = 146) was divided into 2 subgroups
  start of PS                                                               based on growth potential. The pubertal group consisted of 61
  B2                          8 (13)        0 (0)          8 (5)            transgender boys with a mean age of 12.7 ± 1.0 years and BA
  B3                          20 (33)       0 (0)          20 (14)          of 12.4 ± 1.0 at start of PS. The postpubertal group with little
                                                                            or no growth potential consisted of 85 individuals with a
  B4                          23 (38)       10 (12)        33 (23)
                                                                            mean age of 15.1 ± 0.9 years and BA of 15.7 ± 1.1 at start
  B5                          8 (13)        59 (69)        67 (46)
                                                                            PS (Table 1). The outcomes of the pubertal group will be de­
  Missing                     2 (3)         16 (19)        18 (12)          scribed in detail. Data from the postpubertal group will be
Menarche before start of                                                    briefly described at the end of the Results section.
 PS
  Yes                         20 (33)       81 (95)        100 (68)
                                                                            Puberty Suppression
  No                          39 (64)       0 (0)          40 (27)
                                                                            The mean duration of PS was 3.1 ± 0.9 years. At baseline,
  Missing                     2 (3)         4 (5)          6 (4)            mean height was 158.3 ± 8.5 cm (female height SDS +0.1 ±
                                                                            1.5, male height SDS −0.1 ± 1.5). During the puberty suppres­
Data are presented as number (%) or mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; PS, puberty suppression; PAH,          sive phase, height increased by 8.6 cm (95% CI, 7.5-9.6) to
predicted adult height; SDS, SD score.                                      166.9 ± 7.0 cm at start of GAHT. Female height SDS
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2023, Vol. 108, No. 2                                                                 417

decreased to −0.2 ± 1.0 (decrease of −0.2; 95% CI, −0.5 to           1 year (n = 39, 13.6 months to adult dose [IQR, 12.8-15.9]),
0.1). Transgender boys with BA >12 years at start PS declined        no differences in change in height SDS during GAHT were ob­
more in height SDS during PS compared with transgender               served (Fig. 3). Additionally, adult height did not differ be­
boys with BA ≤12 years (difference between groups −0.6;              tween the 2 dosing regimens (difference between groups
95% CI, −0.7 to −0.4) (Fig. 1), but height SDS at start of           0.8 cm; 95% CI, −3.0 to 4.6). Both groups were comparable
GAHT did not differ between the groups (difference 0.3;              at baseline regarding age, height, and BA at the start of PS,
95% CI, −0.3 to 0.9). Additionally, PS resulted in a deceler­        midparental height, and PAH at start PS. When analyzed as
ation of bone maturation. At the beginning of PS, BA was             a continuous variable, time to adult dose was not associated
comparable to CA with a BA – CA of −0.3 ± 0.9 years. This            with the difference between adult height and PAH at the start
difference was greater among those with BA ≤12 at start PS           of PS and PAH at the start of HT either (data not shown).
compared with those with BA >12 years (difference, 0.7 years;           When looking at the difference between adult height and
95% CI, 0.2-1.2). At start of GAHT, the difference between           PAH at the start of PS, an inverse correlation with BA at start
BA and CA further increased to −2.2 ± 1.2 years (change since        PS was found (Fig. 4). A younger BA at the start of PS was as­
start of PS −1.9 years; 95% CI, −2.2 to −1.6). PAH increased         sociated with an adult height further above PAH (1.2 cm/y;

                                                                                                                                                Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/2/414/6747528 by guest on 11 December 2023
by 2.4 cm (95% CI, 1.3-3.4) between start PS and start               95% CI, 0.3-2.1). A similar correlation was observed between
GAHT.                                                                BA at start GAHT and the difference between adult height and
                                                                     PAH (1.2 cm/y; 95% CI, 0.5-2.0). Those with a younger BA at
                                                                     the start of PS also had an adult height further above midpar­
Hormone Treatment                                                    ental height, but this correlation did not reach statistical sig­
GAHT was initiated at a mean age of 15.8 ± 0.5 years. From           nificance (1.3 cm/y; 95% CI, −0.4 to 3.0).
the start of GAHT, height increased by 5.0 cm (95% CI,                  A lower BMI SDS at the start of PS was associated with an
4.3-5.8) to an adult height of 172.0 ± 6.9 (female height SDS        adult height further above PAH at the start of PS. Per 1 SDS
+0.2 ± 1.1, male height SDS −1.7 ± 1.0) (Fig. 2). Female             decrease in BMI, the adult height was 0.4 cm further above
height SDS increased by 0.3 SDS from the start of GAHT to            PAH at the start of PS, but this was not statistically signifi­
adult height (95% CI, 0.2-0.5) (Table 2 and Fig. 3).                 cant (95% CI, 0.0-0.8). In a multivariable analysis, associa­
However, adult height SDS did not differ from height SDS             tions between BA and BMI SDS at start PS on the 1 hand and
at the start of PS (difference, 0.1; 95% CI, −0.2 to 0.4).           the difference between adult height and PAH at start PS on
Compared with male reference data, 22 subjects (36%) had             the other hand were similar to those in the univariable
an adult height below −2.0 SDS. BA – CA remained stable              analysis.
in the first 18 months of GAHT but after that, BA progressive­
ly increased. In 45 subjects (74%), adult height was taller than
                                                                     Laboratory Investigations
PAH at the start of PS. Adult height 3.9 ± 6.0 cm above mid­
parental height (95% CI, 2.4-5.4) and 3.0 ± 3.6 cm above             During the puberty suppressive phase, gonadotrophins were
PAH at start of PS (95% CI, 2.0-3.9), but adult height was           suppressed (median LH 0.3 U/L [IQR, 0.3-0.4]; median FSH
close to PAH at the start of GAHT (difference, 0.2 ± 2.3 cm;         1.1 U/L [IQR, 0.8-1.7]). Median serum estradiol levels were
95% CI, −0.5 to 0.9).                                                20 pmol/L, which was the lower limit of detection (IQR,
                                                                     20-20). IGF-1 levels did not significantly change after initi­
                                                                     ation of PS and remained stable during PS. Mean testosterone
Factors Influencing Growth                                           levels in the first year of GAHT were not significantly higher
When comparing subjects who reached the adult testosterone           in subjects who reached adult dose within 12 months com­
dose within 1 year (n = 21, 10.8 months to adult dose [IQR,          pared with >12 months (95% CI, −18.2 to 18.5 nmol/L).
9.5-11.6]) to those in whom the adult dose was reached after         When adult testosterone dose was reached, median serum

Figure 1. Effect of puberty suppression on female height SDS in      Figure 2. Mixed model analysis of height during PS and GAHT of 17
subjects with BA ≤12 years (n = 32, 57%) and BA >12 years (n = 24,   subjects who initiated PS at age 12 and GAHT at age 16, plotted on the
43%) at start of PS with 95% confidence intervals. PS, puberty       growth chart for Dutch girls from Schönbeck et al (2). GAHT,
suppression.                                                         gender-affirming hormone therapy; PS, puberty suppression.
418                                                                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2023, Vol. 108, No. 2

Table 2. Growth during puberty suppression and testosterone treatment in the pubertal and postpubertal group

                                                Pubertal group (n = 61)     Postpubertal group (n = 85)       Pubertal vs postpubertal group (95% CI)

Height (cm)
  Start of PS                                   158.3 ± 8.5                 166.4 ± 6.7                       8.0 (5.5-10.6)
  Missing                                       0 (0)                       4 (5)
Start of GAHT                                   166.9 ± 7.0                 167.5 ± 7.0                       0.6 (−1.7 to 2.9)
  Missing                                       0 (0)                       3 (4)
  Adult height                                  172.0 ± 6.9                 169.0 ± 6.8                       3.0 (0.7-5.2)
Female height SDS
  Start of PS                                   +0.1 ± 1.5                  −0.1 ± 1.0                        0.1 (−0.3 to 0.6)
  Missing                                       0 (0)                       4 (5)

                                                                                                                                                           Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/2/414/6747528 by guest on 11 December 2023
  Start of GAHT                                 −0.2 ± 1.0                  −0.2 ± 1.1                        0.0 (−0.3 to 0.4)
  Missing                                       0 (0)                       3 (4)
  Adult height                                  +0.2 ± 1.1                  −0.3 ± 1.1                        0.5 (0.1-0.8)
PAH at start of GAHT (cm)                       172.3 ± 7.5                 168.9 ± 7.5                       3.5 (0.0-7.0)
  Missing                                       18 (30)                     53 (62)
  Δ Adult height—PAH (cm)
  PAH at start PS                               3.0 ± 3.6                   1.8 ± 2.0                         1.2 (−0.1 to 2.4)
  Missing                                       5 (8)                       48 (56)
  PAH at start of GAHT                          0.2 ± 2.3                   1.4 ± 1.6                         1.2 (0.2-2.1)
  Missing                                       18 (30)                     53 (62)
  Δ Adult height—midparental height (cm)        3.9 ± 6.0                   3.0 ± 4.7                         0.9 (−1.0 to 2.9)
  Missing                                       5 (8)                       26 (31)
  Δ BA – CA (cm)
  Start of PS                                   −0.3 ± 0.9                  0.9 ± 1.0                         1.2 (0.8-1.6)
  Missing                                       5 (8)                       48 (56)
  Start of GAHT                                 −2.2 ± 1.2                  0.1 ± 1.0                         2.4 (1.8-2.9)
  Missing                                       18 (30)                     53 (62)

Data are presented as number (%) or mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: BA, bone age; CA, chronological age; GAHT, gender-affirming hormone treatment; PAH, predicted adult height; PS, puberty suppression; SDS,
SD score.

testosterone levels were 20 nmol/L (IQR, 11-35) and free tes­                 initiation of testosterone and remained stable thereafter with
tosterone was 599 pmol/L (IQR, 338-1179). IGF-1 levels                        a mean serum level of 32.3 ± 5.9 nmol/L. No significant differ­
slightly increased by 3.6 nmol/L (95% CI, 0.9-6.4) after                      ences in IGF levels during GAHT between participants who

Figure 3. Effect of hormone treatment on female height SDS in
transgender boys in whom adult testosterone dose was reached                  Figure 4. Diagram of the correlation between bone age at start
within
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2023, Vol. 108, No. 2                                                        419

reached adult dose within 12 months and those who reached              The effect of GnRHa and testosterone on adult height in
adult dose >12 months were observed.                                transgender boys was analyzed in 4 manners: (1) the change
                                                                    in height SDS during the treatment; (2) the difference between
                                                                    adult height and PAH at start PS; (3) the difference between
Adolescents With Little or no Growth Potential                      adult height and midparental height; and (4) comparison of
(Postpubertal Group)                                                growth data from the pubertal group with the “control”
In total, 85 transgender boys had little or no growth potential     group of postpubertal adolescents with little/no growth poten­
at the start of PS (Table 1). The mean duration of PS was 1.2 ±     tial at start of the treatment.
0.8 years. Height at start PS was missing in 4 subjects. From          Adult height SDS was comparable to height SDS at start PS,
the start of PS, height increased by 2.5 cm (95% CI, 2.1-3.0)       which would imply that PS and GAHT have no impact on
to an adult height of 169.0 ± 6.8 cm (female height SDS             adult height.
−0.3 ± 1.1, male height SDS −2.1 ± 1.0) (Table 2). In 70               In contrast, adult height was 3.0 ± 3.6 cm above PAH at
(82%) subjects, height increased ≥1 cm during treatment.            start PS. This deviation was greater than the slight underesti­
Adult height was 3.0 ± 4.7 cm above midparental height              mation of adult height by 1.2 ± 4.1 cm and 0.4 ± 4.3 cm de­

                                                                                                                                        Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/2/414/6747528 by guest on 11 December 2023
(n = 57) and 1.8 ± 2.0 cm above PAH at start PS (n = 37).           scribed by Zachmann et al in healthy girls with an age of 12
When comparing adult height in the pubertal group to that           and 13 years, respectively, using the same method of Bayley
in the postpubertal group, individuals in the pubertal group        and Pinneau to predict adult height (22). This might suggest
were taller (difference, 3.0 cm; 95% CI, 0.7-5.2). However,         a slight enhancing effect of PS and GAHT on adult height.
the difference between adult height and midparental height          This is further supported by the finding that adult height
was not significantly different between the groups (difference,     was 3.9 ± 6.0 cm above midparental height.
0.9 cm; 95% CI, −1.0 to 3.0).                                          Finally, the fact that subjects from the pubertal group were
                                                                    3.0 cm taller than those with little/no growth potential at the
                                                                    start of treatment also suggests a positive effect on growth.
Discussion                                                          However, when comparing the difference between midparen­
This study is the first to investigate the effect of both GnRHa     tal height and adult height in both groups, no significant dif­
and testosterone treatment on growth and adult height in            ferences were found. This might be explained by the fact
transgender boys. We observed a decrease in growth velocity         that midparental height was missing in 31% of the postpuber­
and bone maturation during PS and an increase in growth dur­        tal group. It is possible that physicians enquired about paren­
ing GAHT. Adult height was taller than predicted at the start       tal height more often when subjects were shorter to try and
of the treatment, and this difference was more pronounced           understand if short stature was familial.
when the treatment was initiated earlier. In contrast, the tem­        When all 4 methods to evaluate the effect on adult height
po of the testosterone dose increase did not affect growth.         are combined, we conclude that treatment with PS and
   During the puberty suppressive phase, we observed a mean         GAHT does not negatively influence adult height in trans­
decrease in height SDS of −0.2. Ghelani et al reported no sig­      gender boys. When comparing adult height to height pre­
nificant changes in height SDS of GnRHa treatment (6). This         dicted at the start of treatment, to midparental height and to
was because their subjects were older (median age of 16.6           height in the control group, there even seems to be a slight
years) and were only followed for 1 year. Our data showed           positive effect of PS and GAHT on growth.
a greater decrease in height SDS among those with more ad­             When looking at factors that might influence growth, tem­
vanced BA (>12 years) at the start of PS. In subjects with          po of testosterone dose increase was not found to affect
younger BA height, SDS did not decline. This may be due             growth or adult height. In boys with constitutional delay of
the fact that the group with BA >12 years consisted of more         growth and puberty and central hypogonadotropic hypo­
early maturers, who were relative tall for their age, with a re­    gonadism it is thought that higher doses of testosterone induce
gression to the mean after the initiation of GnRHa treatment.       accelerated skeletal maturation and thereby compromise
This is supported by the fact that baseline height SDS was          adult height (23–25). We did not observe such an effect in
higher in the group with BA >12 years but height SDS at the         transgender boys, nor was there a significant difference in tes­
start of GAHT was similar in the groups with BA ≤12 and             tosterone levels, but this might also be attributed to the un­
>12 years. Our results are similar to findings in a previous        timed blood tests resulting in a wide variation of serum
study by Weise et al in girls with central precocious puberty       testosterone levels. Based on these findings, gradually increas­
treated with GnRHa (18). A lower growth velocity in girls           ing the dose over the first year of GAHT seems to allow ado­
with BA ≥10 years was reported compared with girls with             lescents to attain their growth potential. However, we did not
BA
420                                                         The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2023, Vol. 108, No. 2

slightly further above midparental height in those with a            Data Availability
younger BA, which also indicates a positive impact of starting
                                                                     The dataset generated during and analyzed during the current
treatment at a younger BA on adult height. This contradicts
                                                                     study is not publicly available because of privacy regulations.
findings in girls with early-normal puberty in whom treatment
with GnRHa did not result in an increase of adult height (26).
An explanation might be found in the different treatment reg­        References
imens. Puberty suppression until the age of 16 years followed
                                                                     1. Hembree WC, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Gooren L, et al. Endocrine treat­
by puberty induction with testosterone may have different ef­
                                                                         ment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons: an
fects on the epiphyseal growth plates compared with a shorter            Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol
period of PS followed by endogenous puberty with estradiol.              Metab. 2017;102(11):3869-3903.
   Although not statistically significant, there was a trend to­     2. Schönbeck Y TH, van Dommelen P, Bakker B, et al. The world’s
ward a negative association between BMI SDS at start PS                  tallest nation has stopped growing taller: the height of Dutch chil­
and the difference between adult height and PAH at start                 dren from 1955 to 2009. Pediatr Res. 2013;73(3):371-377.
PS. Earlier studies also described a negative effect of higher       3. Boogers LS, Wiepjes CM, Klink DT, et al. Trans girls grow tall:

                                                                                                                                                 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/2/414/6747528 by guest on 11 December 2023
BMI on adult height by accelerated growth and earlier epi­               adult height is unaffected by GnRH analogue and estradiol treat­
physeal closure (27, 28). The absence of a statistically signifi­        ment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(9):e3805-e3815.
                                                                     4. Schagen SE, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Delemarre-van de Waal HA,
cant association in our study might be explained by the fact
                                                                         Hannema SE. Efficacy and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hor­
that BMI was within the normal range in most subjects.
                                                                         mone agonist treatment to suppress puberty in gender dysphoric
   Since 36% of the transgender boys had an adult height < −2            adolescents. J Sex Med. 2016;13(7):1125-1132.
SDS compared with the male population, which many, in our            5. Schulmeister C, Millington K, Kaufman M, et al. Growth in trans­
clinical experience, are sad about, future research should in­           gender/gender-diverse youth in the first year of treatment with
vestigate possible therapeutic options to enhance adult height.          gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists. J Adolesc Health.
Because estradiol has an important role in epiphyseal closure,           2022;70(1):108-113.
aromatase inhibition alongside GnRHa and testosterone                6. Ghelani R, Lim C, Brain C, Fewtrell M, Butler G. Sudden sex hor­
might be an effective treatment (29). However, there are no ef­          mone withdrawal and the effects on body composition in late pu­
ficacy or safety data on such an approach in transgender boys,           bertal adolescents with gender dysphoria. J Pediatr Endocrinol
                                                                         Metab. 2020;33(1):107-112.
and it may have a negative impact on bone mineral accrual,
                                                                     7. Roberts SA, Carswell JM. Growth, growth potential, and influences
which is already attenuated by GnRHa treatment. An
                                                                         on adult height in the transgender and gender-diverse population.
American study by Grimstad et al reported a 5 cm taller height           Andrology. 2021;9(6):1679-1688.
in transgender boys treated with oxandrolone, an androgen            8. van de Grift TC, van Gelder ZJ, Mullender MG, Steensma TD, de
which cannot be aromatized to estrogen, compared with un­                Vries AL, Bouman M-B. Timing of puberty suppression and surgi­
treated individuals (30). However, the relatively small groups           cal options for transgender youth. Pediatrics. 2020;146(5):
in this study were not comparable regarding age at the start of          e20193653.
treatment. The use of oxandrolone, which is currently not            9. Wiepjes CM, Nota NM, de Blok CJM, et al. The Amsterdam cohort
available in Europe, or aromatase inhibitors to promote adult            of gender dysphoria study (1972-2015): trends in prevalence, treat­
height might be promising but needs further research.                    ment, and regrets. J Sex Med. 2018;15(4):582-590.
                                                                     10. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical
   This study has strengths and limitations. Strengths are the
                                                                         Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Association
reasonable cohort size and the comparison with individuals
                                                                         Publishing; 2000.
who (nearly) reached adult height before the start of treatment      11. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical
as controls. The retrospective character of the study is a limi­         Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. American Psychiatric
tation because this resulted in some missing data. Other limi­           Association Publishing; 2018.
tations are that X-rays for BA were assessed by various              12. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a stand­
radiologists, possibly resulting in interobserver variability,           ard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: inter­
and that hormone regimens were individualized, making it                 national survey. BMJ. 2000;320(7244):1240-1243.
more difficult to compare treatment strategies.                      13. Tanner JM, Goldstein H, Whitehouse RH. Standards for children’s
                                                                         height at ages 2-9 years allowing for heights of parents. Arch Dis
                                                                         Child. 1970;45(244):755-762.
Conclusion                                                           14. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development
                                                                         of the Hand and Wrist. 2nd ed. Stanford University Press; 1959.
This study has provided new information on the impact of             15. Bayley N, Pinneau SR. Tables for predicting adult height from skel­
GnRHa and testosterone treatment on growth and adult                     etal age: revised for use with the Greulich-Pyle hand standards. J
height, which can be used to counsel transgender boys. PS re­            Pediatr. 1952;40(4):423-441.
sulted in decelerated growth and bone maturation, which ac­          16. Wiepjes CM, de Blok CJ, Staphorsius AS, et al. Fracture risk in trans
celerated after the initiation of testosterone. Although the             women and trans men using long-term gender-affirming hormonal
growth pattern was altered by PS and GAHT, the treatment                 treatment: a nationwide cohort study. J Bone Miner Res.
does not have a negative impact on adult height. There may               2020;35(1):64-70.
even be a slight positive effect on adult height that is more pro­   17. Twisk J, de Boer M, de Vente W, Heymans M. Multiple imputation
                                                                         of missing values was not necessary before performing a longitudin­
nounced in those who start GnRHa at a younger age.
                                                                         al mixed-model analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(9):1022-1028.
Nonetheless, adult height was below −2 SDS compared with
                                                                     18. Weise M, Flor A, Barnes KM, Cutler GB Jr, Baron J. Determinants
the general male population in 36%. Future research is needed            of growth during gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog therapy
to assess the efficacy and safety of possible treatment options          for precocious puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(1):
for those who have a strong wish to increase adult height into           103-107.
the male reference range, such as oxandrolone or aromatase           19. Clemons RD, Kappy MS, Stuart TE, Perelman AH, Hoekstra FT.
inhibitors.                                                              Long-term effectiveness of depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2023, Vol. 108, No. 2                                                                    421

      analogue in the treatment of children with central precocious pu­   25. Boehm U, Bouloux P-M, Dattani MT, et al. European Consensus
      berty. Am J Dis Child. 1993;147(6):653-657.                             statement on congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism—
20.   Boepple PA, Mansfield MJ, Crawford JD, Crigler JF Jr, Blizzard          pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol.
      RM, Crowley WF Jr. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist
                                                                              2015;11(9):547-564.
      treatment of central precocious puberty: an analysis of growth
                                                                          26. Bangalore Krishna K, Fuqua JS, et al. Use of gonadotropin-releasing
      data in a developmental context. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl.
      1990;367:38-43.                                                         hormone analogs in children: update by an international consor­
21.   Stoffers IE, de Vries MC, Hannema SE. Physical changes, labora­         tium. Horm Res Paediatr. 2019;91(6):357-372.
      tory parameters, and bone mineral density during testosterone       27. Brener A, Bello R, Lebenthal Y, Yackobovitch-Gavan M, Phillip M,
      treatment in adolescents with gender dysphoria. J Sex Med.              Shalitin S. The impact of adolescent obesity on adult height. Horm
      2019;16(9):1459-1468.                                                   Res Paediatr. 2017;88(3-4):237-243.
22.   Zachmann M, Sobradillo B, Frank M, Frisch H, Prader A.              28. Sopher AB, Jean AM, Zwany SK, et al. Bone age advancement in
      Bayley-Pinneau, Roche-Wainer-Thissen, and Tanner height predic­         prepubertal children with obesity and premature adrenarche: pos­
      tions in normal children and in patients with various pathologic        sible potentiating factors. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011;19(6):
      conditions. J Pediatr. 1978;93(5):749-755.
                                                                              1259-1264.

                                                                                                                                                    Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/2/414/6747528 by guest on 11 December 2023
23.   Rogol AD. New facets of androgen replacement therapy during
                                                                          29. Wit JM. Should skeletal maturation be manipulated for extra height
      childhood and adolescence. Expert Opin Pharmacother.
      2005;6(8):1319-1336.                                                    gain? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:812196.
24.   Young J. Approach to the male patient with congenital hypogona­     30. Grimstad FW, Knoll MM, Jacobson JD. Oxandrolone use in trans-
      dotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2012;97(3):           masculine youth appears to increase adult height: preliminary evi­
      707-718.                                                                dence. LGBT Health. 2021;8(4):300-306.
You can also read