Is the strategic use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)? - The University of the West Indies, St ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Is the strategic use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)? Kegan Romelle Jones1,2* and Gary Wayne Garcia2 1 Department of Basic Veterinary Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Facutly of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine 2 Department of Food Production, Faculty of Food and Agriculture, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine *Corresponding author email: keganjones11@gmail.com Agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) is a rodent that is found in the neotropical region. This animal is hunted for its meat but has recently been reared in captivity as a source of meat protein in rural communities. This study was done in two phases, with the first phase investigating the growth and carcass parameters of agouti. The second phase investigated the effect of an anthelmintic on reproductive performance. In the first phase of the experiment 14 weaned agoutis, each weighing around 1 kg, were divided randomly into two groups. The first group was not given any anthelmintic treatment but the second group was treated with Endovet Ces® subcutaneously for every 3 months. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the two groups in the carcass weight, weight gain, dressing percentage (hot and cold), heart, lungs, skin, head and feet. However, a significant difference (P < 0.05) was seen between groups in the weight of liver and pluck. The live weights of the animals, at the end of the experiment, for animals that were not dewormed and those that were dewormed were 2.4 kg and 2.6 kg respectively. The dressing percentage of animals in the treatment groups were 57% and 55%. The results suggest that the use of anthelmintic drugs in agoutis reared intensively had no significant effect on weight gain and dressing percentage. The second phase was a 20 month experiment that was carried out to evaluate the effect of an anthelmintic on the growth and performance of agouti reared in captivity; thirty two animals were divided in two treatment groups (15 females and one male for each group) based on a randomized study design. In the first group (control group), animals were not given subcutaneous injections of Endovet Ces® (ivermectin and praziquantel) at 0.2 mg/kg every 3 months. The second group was given Endovet Ces® every 3 months. Reproductive data were collected at parturition including birth weight, litter weight, litter size and gender of offspring. The results showed that there was no statistical difference (P > 0.05) between the treatment groups with respect to birth weight, litter weight, litter size and gender. Therefore, these animals can be kept in captive conditions, without being dewormed, to produce efficiently with proper feeding and housing management. Keywords: Dasyprocta leporina, agouti, anthelmintic, dressing percentage, Trinidad Agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) is a rodent released into the wild (Brown-Uddenberg et al. belonging to the family Dasyproctidae (Nowak 2004). and Walker 1999) that is found in the neotropics. Livestock that are present in the neotropics Agouti is hunted in the wild and farmers have can be grouped based on their origins. The first begun rearing the animals intensively (Brown- group are domesticated livestock introduced into Uddenberg et al. 2004). The animal is a source the neotropics. These animals include cattle (Bos of meat protein for rural villages (Nunes et al. indicus, Bos taurus), sheep (Ovis aries), goat 2019). This rodent has been classified as micro– (Capra hircus), pigs (Sus sucrofa), horses livestock (NRC 1991) or mini-livestock (Equus caballus) and chickens (Gallus (Harduin et al. 2003) along with the lappe domesticus) (Jones and Garcia 2018a). These (Agouti paca), capybara (Hydrochoerus animals were brought into the neotropics by the hydrochaeris) and guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). Europeans. The second group are domesticated The production of agouti in captivity has two animals that originated in the neotropics. These functions. Firstly, it allows for consumption of animals are ducks (Anas platyrhynchos), turkeys the animals and thus decrease the hunting (Maelegradis gallipavo), chinchillas (Chinchilla pressures in the wild. Secondly, it acts as a source langifera) and South American camelids (Lama of ex-situ conservation where animals can be gunacoa, Lama glama, Lama pacos, Vicuna 0041–3216/2020/040281–291 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 97 No. 4 September 2020 281 © 2021 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad)
Is use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)?; K.R. Jones and G.W. Garcia vicuna) (Jones and Garcia 2019). The third group Suepaul et al. 2016), investigation of the effects of animals are non–domesticated neotropical of parasites on performance parameters is useful. animals with the potential for domestication. Recently, endoparasites such as Eimeria These animals include agouti (Dasyprocta spp., Trichuris spp., Strongyoides spp. and leporina), lappe (Agouti paca), capybara Paraspidodera uncinata have been found in (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris), red brocket deer agouti (Jones and Garcia 2017, 2018b). (Mazama americana) and manicou (Didelphis However, these animals were in excellent body marsupialis insularis) (Jones et al. 2019b). condition (Jones and Garcia 2018b) and blood There is a vast amount of information on the parameters were within normal reference values domesticated livestock animals (native and (Jones et al. 2019a). This observation stimulated introduced in the neotropics). However, there is research into the effects of endoparasites of a dearth of information on non–domesticated captive reared agouti in Trinidad. neotropical animals, such as the agouti. Factors Jones et al. (2019c) summarized parasitic affecting its production must be known if this organisms that affect neotropical animals. It was animal is to be domesticated. In the found that few animals exhibited clinical conceptualization of intensive animal production diseases and few authors reported the effect of systems, it is necessary to know the biology and the parasites on these animals. Agouti have been reproductive aspects of this animal. Based on found with gastrointestinal parasites in captivity their diets, these animals have been previously as well as in the wild. In Trinidad, Suepaul et al. classified as frugivores and herbivores (Garcia et (2016) identified a cestode, a trematode, an al. 2000; Silvius and Fragoso 2003; Henry 1999). ascarid like worm, Strongyloides spp., Recently, these animals have been reclassified as Helminthoxy urichi and Trichuris spp. Jones and omnivores due to their eating habits in captive Garcia (2017, 2018b) found similar parasites to and wild populations (McWilliams 2009; those found by Suepaul et al. (2016), but the Figueira et al. 2014; Lall et al. 2018; Jones et al. animals were in good body condition. 2019c; Smith and Smith 2019). Anatomically, Endoparasites in agouti have been reported agouti has a large caecum that facilitates fibre in Brazil (Goncalves et al. 2007; Lainson et al. digestion and a simple acid pepsin stomach 2007, da Silva et al. 2008; Ramos et al. 2016), (Garcia et al. 2000). Paraguay (Cassone and Durette–Dessete 1991) Agoutis produce one to three offsprings per and Guyana (Zimmerman et al. 2009). However, parturition throughout the year. Adult animals most authors failed to record the effects the weigh between 2 – 4 kg and take 9 months to parasites had on the animals. The objective of reach sexual maturity (Guimaraes et al. 2009). this study, therefore, was to investigate the effect The adult female agouti has an oestrus cycle that of an anthelmintic on the growth and ranges from 28 – 31 days (Guimaraes et al. reproductive performance of agouti. 2011). The gestation period of these animals is 103 days (de Oliviera et al. 2019). There is Methodology information in the literature on the nutrition and reproduction of agouti, but limited on health Animal location and housing management. However, one of the major threats to livestock production has been parasitic This study was carried out at the Neotropical diseases and currently limited information is Wildlife Unit at The University of the West available on the effects of parasites on Indies Trinidad Field Station Farm. The farm performance parameters in agouti. Due to the is located in Mt. Hope (10º38’16” N and presence of numerous endoparasites (Griffiths 61º25’41” W.). An average day temperature of 1940; Cameron and Reesal 1951; Lainson et al. 32 0C, and an average night temperature of 22 0 2007; da Silva et al. 2008; Goncalves et al. 2007; C were recorded. The average humidity was 282 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 97 No. 4 September 2020
Is use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)?; K.R. Jones and G.W. Garcia 82% with an average annual rainfall of 1700 analyses. The blood samples were refrigerated mm. The unit has been operational for more at 4 0C overnight and analysed at Animedics than two decades. The building is open-sided Pet Hospital located in Chaguanas, Trinidad. allowing for natural ventilation. The animal The blood was analysed using the Abaxis enclosures were cleaned daily. This unit systems (VETSCAN® VS2 Chemistry houses approximately 100 captive reared Analyser and VETSCAN® HM5 hematology agoutis at different physiological states (adult analyser. males, adult non-pregnant females, juveniles Gastrointestinal samples werecollected and pregnant females). Captive reared animals and analyzed using faecal floatation techniques were housed in concrete floor pens as well as (Hendrix and Robinson 2016); 3 g of in cages. gastrointestinal contents were taken and mixed with 45 mls of a 33% zinc sulphate solution. Phase 1 The mixture was then strained to remove excessive debris. The filtrate was then placed Experimental design into a measuring cylinder until a positive meniscus was obtained. The mixture was A total of 14 weaned agoutis were selected, allowed to settle for 15 minutes. A cover slip each weighed approximately 0.9 kg. These was then placed on top of the measuring animals were randomly divided into two cylinder and then placed onto a microscopic groups. The first group of animals was not slide. This slide was viewed under a light given any anthelmintic treatment for the microscope for identification of endoparasitic duration of the experiment. The second group eggs or ova. The faecal analysis was done at the was given Endovet Ces® (ivermectin and Parasitology Laboratory at The UWI School of praziquantel) subcutaneously at 0.5 mg/kg Veterinary Medicine, Mt. Hope. every 3 months during the period May 2018 to July 2019. Diet of the agouti (D. leporina) At the end of the experiment, animals of both groups were slaughtered humanely by The animals were fed a variety of local fruits veterinarians. The live-weights of the animals and forages found on the farm. These included; were taken pre-slaughter. A body condition breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis), guava (Psidium score was given to each animal before guajava), pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) and slaughter. Blood was collected from the mango (Mangifera indica). The diet was animals via the jugular vein and supplemented with approximately 200 g of gastrointestinal contents from the rectum were rabbit rations formulated by National Flour collected. The hot carcass weights and weights Mills® and chicken (Gallus domesticus) eggs of visceral organs, skin, head and feet were daily. Throughout the experiment the agouti taken. The carcasses were chilled for 24 hours were given water ad libitum. and a cold carcass weight was taken (Figure 1). Statistical analysis Blood and gastrointestinal content analysis Data obtained from the study were Blood collected from the jugular vein was summarized as mean ± standard deviation. placed into purple top (with anticoagulant Student t–test analysis using SPSS (20) and a EDTA) and red top (with no anticoagulant) significance level of P ≤ 0.05 was used tubes for haematological and biochemical throughout the experiment. Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 97 No. 4 September 2020 283
Is use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)?; K.R. Jones and G.W. Garcia Phase 2 Statistical analysis Experimental design Data were analyzed using a completely randomized design with the different treatments Thirty healthy multiparous captive reared using the SPSS (20) one–way ANOVA. A female agoutis were selected and randomly significance level of P ≤ 0.05 was used. placed into two groups (15 females to one male Comparisons were made between means of per group) (Figure 2). The males, two-year-old various treatment groups. The effect of proven sires, were chosen for the experiment. anthelmintic on the sex of the offspring was Animals that were chosen had weights ranging determined using the Fisher Exact Test with a from 2.1 – 2.8 kg. The first group (control significance level at P ≤ 0.05. group) was not given a subcutaneous injection with Endovet Ces® (ivermectin and Results praziquantel) at 0.2 mg/kg. Animals that were in the second treatment group received Phase 1 anthelmintic injections every 3 months for the entire experimental period. Female agoutis The blood parameters of the animals fell within were then observed for signs of pregnancy, the normal limits for agoutis housed in captivity which included enlargement of the mammary (Jones et al. 2019a, Baas et al. 1976). No teats and increase in abdominal size. Once gastrointestinal eggs or oocysts were found in the pregnancy was confirmed by physical faecal samples that were taken from the rectum. observation, the females were placed in a Adult worms were also not found in the rectal separated cage. At parturition, the offsprings’ samples collected from the agoutis. The animals sex, birth weights and litter sizes were taken. had a body condition score of 4 out of 5 (Ullman– The offsprings were kept with their mother for Cullere and Foltz 1999). The animals had a good 2 weeks before the mother was returned to her covering of flesh before slaughter (Figure 1). respective group for breeding again. The There was no significant difference (P > experiment took place from May 2018 until 0.05) in the growth, hot carcass, cold carcass, January 2020. hot dressing percentage, cold dressing percentage, gastrointestinal tract (GIT), lungs, Diet of the agouti kidneys, heart, feet and skin between the two treatment groups. The weight of the liver and The animals were fed the same diet as pluck had significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) described in Phase 1. between the two groups (Table 1). Figures 1: Agoutis reared in experimental cages before slaughter, animals in excellent body condition with shiny coats 284 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 97 No. 4 September 2020
Is use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)?; K.R. Jones and G.W. Garcia Table 1: Data obtained from carcasses of the agouti (D. leporina) reared with and without anthelmintic treatments No anthelmintic Anthelmintic SEM P–value Live weight (g) 2413 2643 267 0.3211 Growth (g) 1605 1713 157 0.511 Hot carcass (g) 1380 1580 131 0.058 Hot dressing percentage (%) 57.19 57.14 0.91 0.963 Cold carcass (g) 1389 1476 67.62 0.214 Cold dressing percentage (%) 57.57 55.89 1.49 0.274 Pluck (g) 358.4 427.9 30.89 0.042 Gastrointestinal tract (g) 216.1 261.1 24.1 0.084 Lungs (g) 37.57 45.00 4.23 0.102 Liver (g) 88.86 104.00 3.90 0.002 Kidney (g) 30.43 32.14 1.61 0.303 Heart (g) 32.71 34.67 2.58 0.480 Head (g) 241.0 237.1 14.8 0.797 Feet (g) 93.00 85.29 7.57 0.324 Skin (g) 341.3 381.4 20.8 0.75 The animals that were dewormed had size and gender of offspring. Throughout the significantly higher (P = 0.042) pluck weight duration of the experiment animals that were than the animals that were not dewormed. exposed to the anthelmintic had 25 Agoutis that were dewormed also had parturitions, whilst animals that were not significantly (P = 0.02) heavier livers than exposed had 10 parturitions. The differences in animals not exposed to the deworming agent parturition number may have been due to other (Table 1). The animals in treatment one and reproductive factors such as individual two had live weights of 2.4 and 2.6 kg animals’ oestrus cycle. Further studies will respectively. need to be done to accurately determine if anthelmintic usage has an effect on parturition. Phase 2 There was no statistical difference (P > 0.05) between both treatment groups with respect to Reproductive parameters were reported in this birth weights, litter weights, litter size and experiment; birth weights, litter weights, litter gender of offspring (Table 2). Figure 2: Experimental agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) reared at a female to male ratio of 15:1 on concrete floor pens in Trinidad, West Indies Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 97 No. 4 September 2020 285
Is use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)?; K.R. Jones and G.W. Garcia At birth, offspring of agoutis treated with the was 343.0 g. The litter size was recorded as 1.7 anthelmintic weighed 220.2 g as compared to offspring per litter for both treatment groups. the offspring of untreated agoutis that weighed Throughout the experiment, only single and 209.1 g. The average litter weight of animals twin births were recorded. The anthelmintic treated with the anthelmintic was 369.8 g, had no significant effect on the gender of the whilst the average weight of the control group offspring produced (P = 0.251) (Table 3). Figure 3: Adult female agouti that produced twin offspring Table 2: Effect of anthelmintic treatment on some reproductive parameters of the agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) No anthelmintic (n = Anthelmintic (n=25) P–value 10) Birth weight (g) 209.1 220.24 0.263 Litter weight (g) 343.0 369.8 0.704 Litter size 1.7 1.7 0.676 Tables 3: Two way table showing effect of anthelmintic treatment on male and female offspring in the agouti Control Anthelmintic Total P value Male 5 19 24 0.251 Female 12 21 33 Total 17 40 57 286 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 97 No. 4 September 2020
Is use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)?; K.R. Jones and G.W. Garcia Discussion dewormed animals had a significant reduction in live weight as compared to the control Phase 1 (animals given no dewormer) (Thomas and Morgan 2013). This current study with alpacas The average live weights obtained in this and agoutis suggest that endoparasites may not experiment for the two treatments were 2.4 kg be detrimental to the animals. Endoparasites and 2.6 kg. The live weight of adult agoutis have been found in agouti in the neotropics. recorded in the literature was between 2 – 4 kg Some of the endoparasites identified were: (Baas et al. 1976; Eisenberg and Redford 1999; Stichorchis giganteus, Raillietina Brown-Uddenberg et al. 2004; Mc Williams demerariensis var. trinitatae, Strongyloides 2009). Data on the carcass of agouti have not agouti, Trichuris gracilis var. trinitatae, been reported in the literature. However, the Acanthocheilonema spp., Fuellebornema dressing percentages found (57% and 55%) agoutii, Pudica pudica, Apidodera binansata were similar to those of other neotropical var. agoutiae, Helminthoxys urichi, Eimeria animals such as the collared peccary (P. aguti, E. cotiae and E. paraensis (Griffiths tajacu/ T. tajacu) and the capybara (H. 1940; Cameron and Reesal 1951; Goncalves et hystrochaeris). The dressing percentage of the al. 2007; Lainson et al. 2007; da Silva et al. capybara ranged from 51 – 55% (Saadoun and 2008; Suepaul et al. 2016; Jones and Garcia Cabrera 2008, Pinheiro and Moriera 2012) and 2017, 2018b). In this study, endoparasitic eggs that for the collared peccary was between 52.1 were not identified using faecal floatation – 60.4% (Saadoun and Cabrera 2008; techniques. The absence of endoparasitic eggs Albuquerque et al. 2010, 2012). does not imply that endoparasites were absent There were significant differences in the in these animals. Faecal floatation can be weight of the pluck and the liver between the inconclusive in cases where the parasites have two treatment groups. The pluck of agouti not reached maturity. Female helminths may comprises of organs that are present in the also shed eggs periodically if the animal is thoracic and abdominal cavities. The stressed, thus if faeces is collected in non– difference in the weight of the pluck between stressful situations, eggs will not be present in the treatments was due to the liver weight. This the faeces (Soulsby 1968). difference between treatments was not Earlier work by Jones and Garcia (2017, expected. Until this experiment, none was 2018b) found that the gastrointestinal parasites previously done on agouti, hence this study had no effect on the animals’ body condition. provides the first baseline data on the use of Trichuris gracilis (2.2 x 102 eggs per gram), anthelmintic in the rearing of agouti. The liver Paraspidoera uncinata, Eimeria spp. (2.1 x weight was the only organ in the animal with a 103 eggs per gram), Strongyloides spp (4.28 x significant difference between the two groups. 102 eggs per gram) were found in these The anthelmintic used, Endovet Ces® reduces animals. These animals were at a body the number of endoparasites in domesticated condition of 3 out of 5 with serum biochemical livestock. It contains ivermectin and and haematological values showing no praziquantel which can be used to treat evidence of parasitic infection (Jones et al. roundworms and flatworms (Hendrix and 2019a). The results of this study were in Robinson 2016). agreement with Jones and Garcia (2017, The results suggest that the use of Endovet 2018b) who demonstrated that anthelmintic Ces® had no effect on the live weight and most use did not improve the animal’s performance; of the carcass traits that were recorded. all animals had a body condition of 4 out of 5. Interestingly, a similar experiment was done The ability of the non-treated group to on weaned alpacas (Vicugna pacos) and perform as well as the treated group suggests Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 97 No. 4 September 2020 287
Is use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)?; K.R. Jones and G.W. Garcia that agouti may have an inherent ability to 193.2 g. In comparison to this study higher handle endoparasites of the gastrointestinal birth weights were recorded in Trinidad by tract. These results suggest that anthelmintics Brown–Uddenberg (2001), where male are not required in the intensive production of agoutis weighed 307 g and females weighed agouti. However for domesticated livestock 288 g. Differences in the birth weights reared in the neotropics, strategic anthelmintic recorded by several authors can be attributed to treatment is necessary for optimal animal the feeding regimes used in the captive sites. performance. Environmental factors can also play a Similar results were reported on the growth considerable role in the birth weight of of the agouti, with no statistical significance offspring. seen between animals that were dewormed as There is no published literature on litter compared to the control group. Parameters weights of agouti. This parameter is of such as dressing percentage, average daily gain paramount importance as it can be used in the and adult body weight were not affected by the calculation of the ratio of litter weight to the use of a dewormer (Jones and Garcia maternal body weight. The use of Endovet unpublished). The results obtained in this study Ces® had no statistical effect (P > 0.05) on the were in contrast to results reported for litter size of the agouti; the average litter size domesticated livestock species. In cattle, the of agoutis in this study (both treatment groups) use of an anthelmintic, such as fenbendazole, was 1.7. The majority of births were twins, had a positive effect on production. Cattle with no records of triples or quadruplets. A which were dewormed had higher weight gain similar average litter size of 1.71 was recorded as compared to the negative control group in in captive reared agoutis in Trinidad (Brown– North America (Baltzell et al. 2015). The Uddenberg 2001). Slightly higher litter sizes of effects of deworming on reproduction in 2.1 and 2.09 were recorded in the Peruvian N’Dama cattle were investigated and annual Amazon and in Brazil respectively (Mayor et calving rates were higher for animals treated al. 2010; Pachaly et al. 2001). with fenbendazole as compared to the The sex ratio of the offspring showed no untreated group. It was found that animals statistical difference (P =0.251) between should be dewormed twice a year to obtain treatment groups. Pachaly et al. (2001) optimal results (Zinsstag et al. 1997). reported a female to male ratio of 1 to 1 which Anthelminthic usage generally cause increase was similar to the agoutis that were exposed to in growth and reproductive performance in an anthelmintic. The information obtained in domesticated livestock. Generally, this experiment showed that the use of an endoparasites compete with their hosts for anthelmintic (Endovet Ces®) had no statistical nutrients that are needed for improved significance on the reproductive performance performance. with respect to birth weight, litter size, litter weight and sex ratio of captive reared agoutis Phase 2 in Trinidad. The birth weight of offsprings showed no Conclusion statistical difference (P > 0.05) among treatment groups; the mean birth weight of the Deworming weaned agoutis that were offsprings from dewormed animals was 220.2 intensively reared had no significant effect on g, while that of the control group was 209.1 g. their growth, dressing percentage (hot and Similar birth weights were reported in South cold), weight of the carcass, kidneys, head, America for captive reared agoutis. Pachaly et feet, heart, GIT and skin. However, al. (2001) recorded mean birth weights of deworming had a significant effect on the 288 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 97 No. 4 September 2020
Is use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)?; K.R. Jones and G.W. Garcia weight of the liver and ultimately, the weight T. Sampson. 2004. The Agouti of the pluck. The agouti had dressing (Dasyprocta leporina, D. agouti) Booklet percentages of around 55%, which to the and Production Manual. St. Augustine, authors’ knowledge was the first time to be Trinidad: GWG Publications. recorded in the literature. This dressing Cameron, T.W.M., and M.R. Reesal. 1951. percentage is in similar range to capybara and “Studies on the Endoparasitic Fauna of collared peccary. This study demonstrated that Trinidad Mammals.” Canadian Journal of the use of an anthelmintic strategically in the Zoology 29 (4): 276–289. management of captive reared agoutis had no Cassone, J., and M.C. Durette–Desset. 1991. statistical effect on the reproductive “Five Species (Three New) of parameters. Trichostrongylid Nematodes Coparasites of Dasyprocta azarae, from Paraguay.” References Revue Suisse Zool. 98 (1): 229–242. da Silva, M.K., A.S. da Silva, C.M. Olivieria, Albuquerque, N.I., D.A. Guimaraes, H.LT. and S.G. Montiero. 2008. “Gastrointestinal Dias, Y. Le Pendu, P.R. Kahwage, and Parasites of the Agouti (Dasyprocta A.R. Garcia. 2010. “Intensive Production leporina).” Ciencia Animal Brasiliera 9 Systems of Collared Peccare (Pecari (1): 128–131. tajacu) in Brazilian Amazon.” Advances in de Oliveira, Gleidson Benevides, Hélio Animal Biosciences 1(2): 580–581. Noberto de Araújo Júnior, Rejane dos Albuquerque, N.I., D.A. Guimaraes, H.L.T. Santos Sousa, Ferdinando Vinícius Dias, P.C. Teixeira, and J.A. Moreira. Fernandes Bezerra, Amilton Cesar dos 2012. “Use of Palm Kernel Cakes (Elaeis Santos, Carlos Eduardo Bezerra de Moura, guineensis and Orbignya phalerata), Co– Alexandre Rodrigues Silva, Hugo Products of the Biofuel Industry, in Alexandre de Oliveira Rocha, and Moacir Collared Peccary (Pecari tajacu) feeds.” Franco de Oliveira. 2019. “Morphology of Embrapa Amazônia Oriental–Capítulo em the Genital Organs of the Female Red– Livro Científico, 263–273. Rumped Agouti (Dasyprocta leporina, Baas, E.J., S. Potkay, and J.D. Bacher. 1976. Linnaeus, 1758) During Estrous Cycle “The Agouti (Dasyprocta spp.) in Phases and in Advanced Pregnancy.” Biomedical Research in Captivity.” Journal of Morphology 280(8): 1232– Laboratory Animal Science 26 (5): 788– 1245. 800. Eisenberg, J., and K. Redford. 1999. Mammals Baltzell, P., T. Engelken, A.M. O’Connor. of the Neotropics. V.3. Chicago and 2015. “A Critical Review and Meta– London: The University of Chicago Press, Analysis of the Magnitude of the Effect of 436–466. Anthelminthic Use on Stocker Calf Figueira, L., R. Zucaratto, A.S. Pires, B. Cid, Production Parameters in Northern US.” and F.A.S. Fernandez. 2014.”Carrion Veterinary Parasitology 214:2–11. Consumption by Dasyprocta leporina Brown–Uddenberg, Roxann C. 2001. (Rodentia: Dasyproctidae) and a Review of “Conceptualisation of an Intensive Meat Use by Agoutis.” Braz. J. Biol., Production Model for the Agouti 74:585–587. (Dasyprocta leporina) a Neotropical Garcia, G.W., Q.S. Baptiste, A.O. Adogwa, M. Rodent in Trinidad, West Indies.” MPhil Kakuni, K. Arishima, and T. Makita. 2000. Thesis. “The Digestive System of the Agouti Brown–Uddenberg, R., G.W. Garcia, Q.S. (Dasyprocta leporina)–Gross Anatomy Baptiste, T. Counand, A.O. Adogwa, and and Histology.” Jpn. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 97 No. 4 September 2020 289
Is use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)?; K.R. Jones and G.W. Garcia 5:55–66. Animals Introduced into the Neo-tropics Goncalves, A.Q., R.M. Pinto, and M.C. Durette- (New World Tropics).” Concepts Dairy Vet. Desset. 2007. “Parasitism of Two Zoonotic Sci. 1 (2): 156–186. Reservoirs Dasyprocta leporina and Jones, K.R., and G.W. Garcia. 2018b. Dasyprocta fuliginosa (Rodentia) from the “Observations on Endoparasitic Load in Amazonas with Trichostrongylina Captive Reared Agoutis (Dasyprocta Nematodes (Heligmonellidae): Description leporina) Without Anthelmintic Exposure of a New Genus and a New Species.” Mem. in Trinidad, Republic of Trinidad and Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 102 (6): 63–768. Tobago.” Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 30 (10): Griffiths, H.J. 1940. “Studies on Strongyloides 1–7. agoutii from the Agouti (Dasyptocta Jones, K.R., and G.W. Garcia. 2019. agouti).” Canadian Journal of Research D “Endoparasites of Domesticated Animals 18:173–190. that Originated in the Neo–tropics (New Guimaraes, D.A.A, R.S.L. Ramos, G.W. World Tropics).” Veterinary Sciences 6 Garcia, and O.M. Ohashi. 2009. “The (1): 24. Stimulatory Effect of Male Agouti Jones, K.R., K.R. Lall, and G.W. Garcia. 2019a. (Dasyprocta prymnolopha) on the Onset of “Haematological and Serum Biochemical Female Puberty.” Acta Amazonica, 39 (4): Values of the Agouti (Dasyprocta leporina) 759–762. Reared Intensively in Trinidad, Republic of Guimaraes, D.A., O.M. Ohashi, M. Singh, and Trinidad and Tobago.” Livest. Res. Rural W. Vale. 2011. “Profile of Plasmatic Dev. 31 (1): 1–8. Progesterone on Pregnancy, and Jones, K.R., K.R. Lall, and G.W. Garica. Postpartum Oestrus of Dasyprocta 2019b. “Omnivorous Behaviour of the prymnolopha (Rodentia: Dasyproctidae).” Agouti (Dasyprocta leporina): A Neo– International Journal of Tropical Biology tropical Rodent with the Potential for 64 (4): 1519–1526. Domestication.” Scientifica, Article ID Hardouin, J., E. Thys, V. Joiris, and D. 3759783, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155 Fielding. 2003. “Mini–Livestock Breeding /2019/3759783 with Indigenous Species in the Tropics.” Jones, K.R., K.R. Lall, and G.W. Garcia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2019c. “Endoparasites of Non– 15: 4. Domesticated Mammals from the Neo– Hendrix, C.M., and E.D. Robinson. 2016. tropics (New World Tropics).” Veterinary Diagnostic Parasitology for Veterinary Sciences 6 (4): 87. Technicians–E–Book. Amsterdam, NY, Lainson, R., L. Carneiro, and F.T. Silveira. 2007. USA: Elsevier Health Sciences. “Observations on the Eimeria Species of the Henry, O. 1999. “Frugivory and the Dasyprocta leporina (Linnaeus, 1758) Importance of Seeds in the Diet of the (Rodentia: Dasyproctidae) for the State of Orange–Rumped Agouti (Dasyprocta Para, North Brazil.” Mem. Inst. Oswaldo leporina) in French Guiana.” J. Trop. Ecol. Cruz 102 (2): 183–189. 15:291–300. Lall, K.R., K.R. Jones, and G.W. Garcia. Jones, K.R., and G.W. Garcia. 2017. “A 2018a. “Nutrition of Six Selected Neo– Survey of the Gastrointestinal Parasites Tropical Mammals in Trinidad and Tobago Present in the Agouti (Dasyprocta with the Potential for Domestication.” Vet. leporina) Reared Intensively in Trinidad.” Sci. 5(2): 52. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 29 (10): 1–7. Mayor, P., R. E. Bodmer, and M. Lopez–Bejar. Jones, K.R., and G.W. Garcia. 2018a. 2010. “Functional Anatomy of the Female “Gastrointestinal Parasites of Domesticated Genital Organs of the Wild Black Agouti 290 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 97 No. 4 September 2020
Is use of an anthelmintic necessary in the management of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)?; K.R. Jones and G.W. Garcia (Dasyprocta fuliginosa) Female in the Science 80 (3): 570–581. Peruvian Amazon.” Animal Reproduction Silvius, K.M., and J.M.V. Fragoso. 2003. Science 123, 3–4: 249–257. “Red–Rumped Agouti (Dasyprocta McWilliams, D.A. 2009. “Determinants of leporina) Home Range Use in an Capture Reared Diets for the Agouti Amazonian Forest: Implications for the (Dasyprocta spp.).” Veterinary Clinics of Aggregated Distribution of Forest Trees.” North America: Exotic Animal Practice Biotropica 35:74–83. 12:279–286. Smith, R.L., and P. Smith. 2019. “Wild National Research Council (NRC). 1991. Observations of Infanticide and Cannibalism Microlivestock: Little-Known Small be Azara’s Agouti (Dasyprocta azarae) Animals with a Promising Economic (Mammalia: Dasyproctidae) in Paraguay.” Future. National Academic Press. Ethology 00: 1–5, http://doi.org/10. Nowak, R.M., and E.P. Walker. 1999. 1111/eth.12937 Walker's Mammals of the World (Vol. 1). Soulsby, E.J. 1968. Helminths, Arthropods and JHU press. Protozoa of Domesticated Animals. Nunes, A.V., R.G. Guariento, B.A. Santos, and Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lea & Febiger. E. Fisher. 2019. “Wild Meat Sharing Suepaul, R., R. Charles, and F. Dziva. 2016. Among Indigenous People in the “Aerobic Microflora and Endoparasites of Southwestern Amazon.” Behavioural Freshly Shot Wild Agouti (Dasyprocta Ecology and Sociobiology 73:26. leporina) in Trinidad, West Indies.” J. Zoo Pachaly, J.R., A. Acco, R.R Lange, T.M.R. Wildl. Med. 47:1044–1048. Noguiera, M.F. Noguiera, and E.M.G. Thomas, S.M., and E.R. Morgan. 2013. “Effect Ciffoni. 2001. “Order Rodentia on Performance of Weanling Alpacas (Rodents).” In Biology, Medicine and Following Treatments against Gastro- Surgery of South American Mammals, 2nd Intestinal Parasites.” Veterinary Parasitology ed., edited by M.E. Fowler, and Z.S. 198 (1–2): 244–9. Cubas, 225–237. Ames, Iowa.: Iowa State Ullman-Cullere, M., and C. Foltz. 1999. “Body University Press, Condition Scoring: A Rapid and Accurate Pinheiro, M.S., and J.R. Moreira. 2012. Method for Assessing Health Status in “Products and Uses of Capybara.” In Mice.” Laboratory Animal Science 49 (3): Capybara: Biology, Use and Conservation 313–323. of an Exceptional Neotropical Species, Zimmerman, D.M., M. Douglass, D.R. edited by J.R. Moreira, K.M. Ferraz, E.A. Reavill, and E.C. Greiner. 2009. Herrera, and D.W. Macdonald, 221–237. “Echinococcus oligarthrus Cystic New York, NY: Springer. Hydatidosis in Brazilian Agouti Ramos, D.G.S., A.R.G.L.O. Santos, L.C (Dasyprocta leporina).” Journal of Zoo Freitas, S.H.R. Correa, G.V. Kempe, and and Wildlife Medicine 40 (3): 551–558. T.O. Morgado et al. 2016. “Endoparasites Zinsstag, J., Ph. Ankers, P. Itty, M. Njie, J. of Wild Animals form Three Biomes in the Kaufmann, V.S. Pandey, and K. Pfister. State of Mato Grosso, Brazil.” Arq. Bras. 1997. “Effect of Strategic Gastrointestinal Med. Vet. Zootec. 68 (3): 571–578. Nematode Control on Fertility and Saadoun, A., and M.C. Cabrera. 2008. “A Mortality of N'Dama Cattle in the Review of the Nutritional Content and Gambia.” Veterinary Parasitology Technological Parameters of Indigenous 73:105–117. Sources of Meat in South America.” Meat Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 97 No. 4 September 2020 291
You can also read