In What Ways Are Introverts Particularly Influential Leaders? - Ashley Waldo Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration Heavener School of ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
In What Ways Are Introverts Particularly Influential Leaders? Ashley Waldo Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration Heavener School of Business University of Florida Spring of 2021
Introduction Over the last year during the COVID-19 pandemic, people across the globe have had to make adjustments at school, in the workplace, and at home. This leap to a more remote world has been difficult for many people, but not everyone shares the same resentment toward operating from home. Some people prefer to be alone and do not derive as much energy from interactions with other people. These people are introverts. With all the lockdowns and quarantines over the last year, many introverts have found this liberating and are adapting quite well (Fawzy, 2020). Naturally, the true colors of introverts are coming to light as many of them do not share the struggles of the extroverts who are eagerly waiting to recharge their relationship batteries with frequent socializing and human interaction. This new world with remote learning and working has also challenged the leadership platform and effectiveness of both introverts and extroverts. Leading through a global crisis surrounded by uncertainty has summoned leaders to put forth their best effort. People in this pandemic are revealing their innate characteristics that contribute to their ability to lead others. Accordingly, now is a very interesting time to examine the positive and potentially challenging attributes that both introverts and extroverts bring to leadership positions. Simply put, true leaders are able to influence people. Society used to believe that there was a specific list of personality traits that someone had to have to be an effective leader. This mindset was a result of the popular trait theory that was developed by psychologists and popular in the early 20th century. Although there is no cookie-cutter mold for born-leaders like the old trait theory suggests, there are many traits and attributes associated with effective leadership (Cutler, 2014). Some of these traits are more often associated with introverts or extroverts, even though correlation does not necessarily indicate causation. These common observations may be 1
true, but they have led to false assumptions about a person’s leadership capacity based on where they fall on the spectrum of introversion to extroversion. Specifically, introverts have been doubted as effective leaders because of stereotypes that will be further explored in this paper. Rather than categorizing and assuming, the differences between individuals should be celebrated, and the strengths of each type of leader, especially in the midst of a catastrophic pandemic, should be highlighted. As leaders, both introverts and extroverts should be aware of their own strengths and weaknesses so they can capitalize and grow. Whether introverted or extroverted, this understanding will equip a leader to reach out of their comfort zone when needed and put their unnatural attributes into practice in order to make an impact on more people as well as maximize their effectiveness. Defining Effective Leadership Before the effects of introversion and extroversion on leadership potential can be examined, leadership must first be defined. Although there are numerous theories arguing over the details, it is now widely accepted that leadership development is a process rather than a single moment or event (Cutler, 2014). During this process, an intertwined group of people are motivated toward a common purpose. There are many elements to the leadership process, but it all comes down to influencing people. In order to lead, there must be followers. These followers are influenced and led; they are not necessarily managed or instructed to obey someone. The best leaders do not always need a position or executive title within an organization to accrue a following. Although being in a position of authority gives someone a great platform to potentially lead those working below them, there is no guarantee that they will earn the privilege to lead others. Leaders can be 2
assigned or naturally emerge in any context and at any age. Leadership is not limited to the office, either. Someone can lead in their family, school, church, or community (Kruse, 2013). There are many organizations that compete to study, simplify, and categorize the complexities of leadership. The well-renowned GLOBE Project (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Project), a ten-year international leadership study covering 60 countries, has condensed a list of leadership dimensions: visionary, inspirational, self-sacrifice, integrity, decisiveness, and performance-oriented (GLOBE, 2014). Gary Yukl, a prominent author, psychologist, and professor, has compiled his own solid list of leadership attributes: high energy level and stress tolerance, self-confidence, internal locus of control, emotional stability and maturity, personal integrity, socialized power motivation, moderately high achievement orientation, and low need for affiliation (Yukl, 2012). Although these accepted writings give a clearer idea of what to expect from great leaders, it is interesting to note that neither introversion or extroversion made it on the list. Leadership can be misunderstood as an adjective (Kruse, 2013). Despite common correlations, leadership positions are not reserved for people born with a certain attribute or personality type. However, people’s innate characteristics can help or harm them in their personal development toward becoming an effective leader. Society seems to have already made up its mind about extroverts and their natural charisma that helps them lead people. However, introverts have a lot to offer too, and in the era of a pandemic it is time to take a closer look at what they can contribute in the area of leadership. Positive Attributes that Introverts bring to Leadership Positions Ability to Listen Actively 3
Because introverts take a lot of time to think before they speak, they are much more likely to listen to, absorb, and apply the ideas offered by a team (Nobel, 2010). This tendency of introverts to be active listeners works in their favor, because communication is very significant in building relationships with followers. Listening actively requires full attention, paraphrasing back to the speaker, and responding appropriately. Since introverts prefer to process information carefully and deeply rather than talk for the sake of doing so, they can quickly gain the respect and trust of followers which leads to their loyalty, obedience, and satisfaction (Evanish, 2019). An introvert’s tendency to listen rather than speak first also works well with a very proactive team. With a proactive and eager team, a leader should be receptive to followers’ ideas and foster an environment where they can creatively express themselves and take initiative. Fortunately, this comes naturally to introverts, a reason they have proven to be more effective leaders than extroverts when working with proactive teams (Nobel, 2010). Observance Introverts are more comfortable than extroverts when working alone or behind the scenes. They do not receive as much energy from interacting in social situations or chaotic environments, so they are easily overstimulated and need time alone to be rejuvenated. Because they prefer to minimize their involvement in these settings, they often sit back and observe their surroundings instead. This means they are quick to notice things and pick up on patterns in most environments (Nobel, 2010). Because they tend to be more detail-oriented, they are also more likely to carefully watch and take note of the attitudes and behaviors of their followers, which is essential in building emotional intelligence and deciding how to motivate and connect with each person. Willingness to Put Others in the Spotlight 4
Introverts do not seek the spotlight or better yet, avoid it altogether. They prefer to boost and encourage those around them by acknowledging and celebrating their victories rather than seeking public validation for their own. Studies have shown that followers want to be recognized, inspired, and empowered by the leaders whom they look up to. When introverted leaders make the natural decision to give their followers this attention, they are more likely to cherish and look up to their leader rather than see them as a threat or competition (Asghar, 2015). Comfort with Independence Taking on a leadership role can be very isolating. Whether standing up for what is right or navigating through unwanted and uncharted change, there can be tension, resistance, and initial distrust from followers. It can take a long time for leaders to warm up to their followers and earn their trust, especially if the leader is there due to a transition of power or serves in an authoritative position. Even though not all leadership is assigned, the power imbalance within the leader-to-follower dynamic can cause a strain. Because introverts are most comfortable by themselves and do not require regular engagement, they are more readily equipped to endure this situation (Cain, 2012). Although being ostracized is not easy for anyone, introverted leaders are less likely to be discouraged or phased by this independence because they prefer to be alone as it is, and their leadership ability will be less marred than those who find comfort in numbers. Self-control Because introverts are not quick to open up or engage within a group setting, it is natural for them to practice self-control. They are contemplative and known for their ability to keep themselves and their emotions in check (Cain, 2012). This can come in handy for introverted leaders, especially in times of crisis where they are more likely to “keep their cool” under pressure for the sake of the group looking up to them. This self-discipline helps introverts be 5
careful and meticulous about what and how they choose to share. Accordingly, they are known by their followers to be even-keeled and calm when reacting (Asghar, 2015). Investment in Quality Relationships Although strong relationships are not reserved for any personality type, introverts often have a few sincere connections rather than multiple surface-level ones. Introverts are deep thinkers, and they also choose their voluntary interactions very carefully (Asghar, 2015). This special combination of qualities makes them likeable leaders, because they would rather invest in a genuine connection with their followers rather than have many acquaintances. Observant and attentive followers pick up on this kind of behavior, and they appreciate the intimate and sincere one-on-one conversations that introverted leaders prefer to have instead of speaking in front of a crowded room. When it comes to relationships, introverted leaders are known for prioritizing quality over quantity. Potential Challenges of an Introverted Leader Overthinking Because introverts tend to think and feel so deeply, this can cause them to overthink just about anything. Researchers have found that introverts show more electrical activity in their brains whether resting or engaging in a task, thus more cortical arousal in their brains. These high levels of brain activity in introverts are a direct result of overthinking (Granneman, 2017). Introverts are constantly absorbing and processing information which can be incredibly overwhelming and become a barrier. Introverts prefer to “think more talk less”, which can get them caught up by intrusive thoughts, negativity, and worries that hinder their leadership effectiveness (Evanish, 2019). Since introverts are prone to overthink and on occasion hesitate from opening up with others, they often forgo opportunities to rant and unload when they are 6
stressed. They are vulnerable to emotional and mental burnout that they could take out on their followers. Chaotic overthinking can even lead to overthinking about thinking itself, which can cause introverted leaders to anxiously doubt their abilities and worry too much about the perceptions from their followers. Antisocial Appearance Introverts prefer to be alone, which leads to many assumptions and stereotypes about their ability to lead other people. Since they are not as comfortable in social settings, people may mistake their independence for them being antisocial, closed-off, or too quiet. Because introverts tend to be more quiet, they are also often uncomfortable with confrontation, which can obstruct a leader’s ability to deal with conflict. Regardless of whether or not it is true, the belief that they are disinterested in others can make followers see them as unapproachable. This is why they do noticeably well with proactive teams and not as well with passive ones, as productivity can be stifled if the leader and his/her followers are for the most part reserved (Nobel, 2010). Lack of Confidence Introverted leaders can look like they lack confidence which can make them feel less confident. People want to admire confident yet humble leaders, and they associate confidence with being outgoing. Since introverted leaders are more soft-spoken, they are less often viewed as the bold and assertive leaders who can command the attention of everyone in the room (Cain, 2012). Although self-awareness is important, introverted leaders know they are often overlooked as effective leaders because of their natural attributes; they know they do not fulfill the common stereotypes of a leader. This can make them self-conscious about their leadership ability and doubt their potential. As such, it is important that their valuable uniqueness is recognized to build confidence. 7
Positive Attributes that Extroverts Bring to Leadership Positions Charisma Within leadership positions, extroverts bring a remarkable ability to inspire those around them with their alluring charm. By using their natural charisma, extroverted leaders can be very compelling, and it is usually easy for them to command the attention of a room and win people over (Nobel, 2010). Successful leaders require dedicated followers, and extroverted leaders radiate a contagious energy that attracts and inspires their followers. This charisma makes them very convincing, which is why extroverted leaders perform especially well when guiding a more passive group of followers who require engaging leadership (Asghar, 2015). They also captivate people because they seem very upbeat and positive, and most followers want to look up to a leader with an optimistic attitude who is full of vibrant energy (Percy, 2019). When people are asked to describe a great leader, whether assigned or emerging, charisma almost always makes the top of the list, and it is a huge advantage that extroverts naturally bring to leadership positions (Nobel, 2010). Boldness Extroverts also possess boldness. Unlike introverts, extroverts do not hesitate to “put themselves out there”. They are very likely to stand up first in a crowded room, and they are also quick to speak. Combined with their charisma, this boldness is a key feature of extroverts that makes them influential leaders (Nobel, 2010). Even if the idea is not a good one, an extroverted leader’s outspokenness grabs attention and makes them more persuasive. In being assertive, extroverted leaders also appear very confident. Although there is a fine line between arrogance and confidence, the perfect amount of boldness makes an extroverted leader look qualified, eager, and prepared to lead a group of followers (Cain, 2012). 8
Naturally-emerging As previously mentioned, leaders can be assigned or naturally emerging. Emergent leadership occurs when a person gradually finds themselves fulfilling a leadership role overtime rather than being appointed to be a leader. Emerging leadership transpires from natural group dynamics and how the leader interacts with their followers. Because extroverts can be bold and charismatic, there is a strong relationship between extroversion and emergent leadership. Their tendency to naturally emerge as leaders does not necessarily indicate that they will be the most effective leaders, but it does give them an initial advantage in influencing others (Spark, 2018). Their predisposition to emerge as leaders also contributes to the stereotypes surrounding leaders and why many people assume introverts are less capable to lead effectively. Desire to Collaborate Extroverts thrive in collaborative environments. Unlike introverts, extroverts acquire energy from socializing, and extroverts genuinely enjoy the frequent company of other people (Percy, 2019). After time alone, they get back to being themselves by recharging their batteries through interacting with others. As a leader, the innate desire to collaborate with other people is hugely significant. Leadership can only happen if there are other people involved, so extroverts have little trouble holding up this part of the deal. They thrive when engaging in teamwork, and they tirelessly bring an abundance of liveliness and enthusiasm to these settings. As “social butterflies”, they regularly seek out ways to introduce themselves and make connections with others. Because they are so sociable, they appear friendly and affable, so followers often see them as very approachable. Extroverted leaders are known for their fondness of collaborating, so potential followers, especially passive ones, tend to be reeled into followership rather than deterred from it (Asghar, 2015). 9
Potential Challenges of an Extroverted Leader Overconfidence Although introverted leaders are often doubted and underestimated based on stereotypes, the assumptions that follow extroverted leaders can be quite harmful too. Because extroverts are so naturally charismatic and bold, they tend to be more confident in their ability to lead people, whether it be in the workplace or their personal lives (Cain, 2012). Their outspokenness can easily be mistaken for arrogance, and this self-assurance can quickly get out of hand and repel followers who prefer to be led by someone who displays humility. The tendency of extroverted leaders to be overconfident can also jeopardize their own performance at work. People in leadership positions who rank high in extroversion are more susceptible to short bursts of enthusiasm. As found in published studies researching CEOs in both Ireland and the United States, their overconfidence can lead to outbursts of extroverted energy. Because of overconfidence, this vigor can create a risk-taking propensity that is significantly higher than that of introverts (O’Mahony, 2019). This can be incredibly dangerous in a leadership role, especially if it leads to having overly optimistic performance forecasts and clouded executive decision-making. Attention-seeking Image Unlike introverts, extroverts prefer to initiate conversation, and they are more comfortable talking to strangers. Although this contributes to their bold charisma that they successfully contribute to leadership positions, it can leave people with the impression that they just crave attention. As previously mentioned, extroverts derive energy from these social interactions. Their behavior is a lot more complex than “seeking attention”. However, because the average person understandably does not study or understand the psychological underpinnings 10
and motivations behind introversion and extroversion, followers see extroverts’ outspoken tendencies as attention-seeking and are often irritated by this behavior in a leader (Percy, 2019). It can be very challenging for them to overcome the stereotypes and prove that they are not a hotshot, even if an extroverted leader is humble (Asghar, 2015). Conversational Intensity Throughout history, extroverted leaders have shown an exceptional magnetism that draws in followers and keeps them captivated by their charm and energy alone. However, this ability to engage with followers and their tendency to seek frequent collaboration can be overwhelming at times. Similarly to how followers can be bothered by the way extroverted leaders appear to want attention, they might also distance themselves when a leader is quick to “dominate” a social situation (Nobel, 2010). Because extroverts crave social stimulation, they tend to brainstorm out loud and talk before they listen, key reasons why they work best with passive followers. However, their tendency to talk first and listen later can hinder their productivity and potential connection with certain followers. When a leader is less methodical and talks more than they listen to their own followers, followers often feel overlooked and that their ideas are disregarded. Studies have shown that extroverted leaders also tend to clash with proactive followers, feel threatened, and often have a need to be competitive with those around them (Evanish, 2019). Similar to the way in which introverted leaders work well with more active groups of followers, the conversational intensity of extroverted leaders makes them a much better match for more passive teams (Nobel, 2010). Importance of Self-Awareness Self-awareness is being conscious of one’s own unique facets. To be self-aware means to have an understanding of one’s own personality, thoughts, habits, needs, emotions, and beliefs 11
(Davis, 2019). Self-awareness is not selective, because it includes knowing one’s strengths as well as his/her most crippling weaknesses. Having this quality is incredibly important for leaders in order to better comprehend themselves as well as grasp how to understand and interact with others. Fortunately, self-awareness can be developed and enhanced. It is not preordained for a certain personality type. Self-awareness can be increased through a variety of ways, especially through means that involve introspection and reflection. One of the most common vehicles for increasing self- awareness through introspection and reflection is self-assessment. Self-assessments help individuals take a closer look at themselves and learn about what motivates their behaviors. They can be as simple as a personality questionnaire or as complex as an inventory of questions that provides specific codes and categories. Some of the most popular and notable self-assessment tools include the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), Clifton Strengthsfinder, Holland Code, and the Big Five Personality Assessment (Osman, 2018). Each self-assessment offers unique insights and can be utilized to investigate many aspects of a person, including his/her preference and style in areas like decision-making, work environment, problem-solving, and leadership style. Most of these tools listed give insight on where someone leans on the scale of introversion to extroversion. Because someone’s identity as an introvert or extrovert is so pivotal to their leadership style and can be an indicator of their potential advantages and challenges, it is very often explored in self-assessments aimed at boosting self-awareness. When a leader has acquired the self-awareness to know whether he/she is an introvert or an extrovert, the individual is more prepared to start on the path toward personal growth, change, and development. Whether introverted or extroverted, the best leaders are aware of their own strengths, weaknesses, personalities, subliminal tendencies, and preferences. This increases their 12
interpersonal efficacy and emotional intelligence, and it also empowers leaders to break free from the confinement of a definition. Both introverted and extroverted leaders can be discouraged by the assumptions surrounding their tendencies, so self-awareness is the first step toward the ability to practice and master behaviors that are unnatural to them. For example, a right-handed person probably does not write her name well using her left hand. However, if she practices writing her name using her nondominant hand 50 times every day, she will certainly see growth and improvement over time. In the same way, self-aware introverted and extroverted leaders can find themselves becoming “ambidextrous leaders” if they regularly practice reaching outside of their comfort zone and habits. When introverted or extroverted leaders are able to adjust their style in a given situation, they will receive more positive feedback, have increased self-confidence, higher motivation, and a deeper commitment that will boost performance and satisfaction of themselves and their followers in the long run (Rowe, 1987). Introverts and extroverts do not need to change to be better leaders. However, they can maximize their influence and impact by knowing how and when to challenge the status quo of their preferred leadership style, something that often comes through greater self-awareness. Finally, self-awareness leads to authentic leadership in connecting who you are with how you lead (Cutler, 2014). By being fully conscious of oneself and how it impacts the ability to influence others, leaders have a coherent sense of self that they can use as a reference point for authentic leadership (Eriksen, 2009). Self-aware, authentic leaders also naturally act in congruence with themselves. Their thoughts, beliefs, and values are compatible with their actions, and it decreases their chances of experiencing cognitive dissonance. Effective leaders want to be their best selves and always set a good example, but they should be genuine and not put up a front. Not all followers are easily fooled or convinced by a staged performance, and this 13
misrepresentation can lead to a lack of both trust and respect that can permanently inhibit a leader’s ability to positively influence them. Devoted followers want legitimate and genuine leaders, no matter how introverted or extroverted the leader truly is. Authentic leaders have a greater capacity to build credibility with followers and establish honest and substantial relationships that outlive the workplace or job titles (Cutler, 2014). Trusting followers not only listen to the leader better and contribute to cohesiveness, but they often have better morale, retention, and performance too. This authentic bond can curate an atmosphere and culture where loyalty and teamwork are common outputs, and this can spread throughout the rest of an organization at an accelerated pace (Eriksen, 2009). Work Environments Where Introverts Thrive Many of society’s social constructs, such as work, school, and sports teams, provide a readymade environment for extroverts to thrive due to the stimulation they provide (Cain, 2012). Even though the COVID-19 pandemic is causing some hopefully temporary adjustments, administrators and leading educators are trying to shift away from cubicles, offices, walls, and separated desks in the workplace and classrooms. They are trying to implement open concepts to offer more opportunities for socializing, and this is facilitated by less offices and more group tables and extended workspaces (Ross, 2017). Although teamwork and collaboration are incredibly important in the workplace and education system for both introverts and extroverts, there is an appropriate time for deep-thinking and solitude that should not be discouraged or eliminated by a system’s design (Cain, 2012). Introverts are not limited to success in certain careers or fields, but they do tend to gravitate toward some jobs and industries. Introverts overrepresent employees in the fields of psychiatry, IT, engineering, architecture, psychology, technical writing, accounting, science, and 14
art. These career choices offer more chances for independence, listening, thoughtful problem- solving, and one-on-one interactions, so the nature and demands of these jobs seem to pull an introvert into that ideal environment where they can thrive (Gaffney, 2020). Regardless of introverted preferences, the average person works with and is surrounded by a diverse combination of personality types. In the United States, the split between introverts and extroverts is nearly even, introverts accounting for a bit less than half of the general population. Because of their natural disposition, introverts tend to have a harder time pursuing and earning promotions, and they often feel that they have to act more like extroverts to get noticed (Cain, 2012). Although introversion or extroversion should not be used as an excuse or to undermine someone deserving, many introverts are finding themselves to be underappreciated, overworked, and vulnerable to a self-fulfilling prophecy at work (Ross, 2017). However, research has shown that about 70% of CEOs describe themselves as introverts. Some of the most famous examples of introverted CEOs include Bill Gates of Microsoft, Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway, producer and director Steven Spielberg, and Brenda Barnes of PepsiCo. Part of their success can be attributed to their ability to act like extroverts in appropriate situations, making them ambiverts. An ambivert is an individual who can leverage both introversion and extroversion depending on what is needed for the situation, and this is a remarkable skill that both introverts and extroverts should try to practice to become the “ambidextrous leaders” capable of maximizing their effectiveness (C-Suite Network, 2019). Conclusion Our society is being shaped and molded each day as it faces seemingly insurmountable obstacles like the COVID-19 pandemic. In these crucial times, influential leaders who can guide organizations with clarity, safety, and positive change are needed. Although introverted leaders 15
face potential challenges just like extroverted leaders, they should not be overlooked for the opportunity to lead due to their nature or the assumptions surrounding them. Human nature has convinced society that extroverts are more fit for the position as charismatic and bold leaders, and everyone is slowly unlearning this philosophy that has been engrained in society for a long time (Cain, 2012) (Asghar, 2015). Introverts bring many positive attributes to leadership positions, and they are just as capable of influencing others in their own way. With their ability to listen actively, observance, willingness to put others in the spotlight, comfort with independence, investment in quality relationships, and self-control, introverted leaders have a lot to contribute to their followers, their communities, our society, and the world. Apart from introversion or extroversion, there are many other aspects of someone’s personality that influence their leadership style as well as the attributes and challenges that accompany them. Many of these are worth examining in the future to uncover more research and draw insightful conclusions. Specifically, studying other dimensions of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) such as sensing versus intuition, thinking versus feeling, and judging versus perceiving would prove useful in expanding the knowledge of how leadership is impacted by someone’s perception of the world and decision-making style (The Myers-Briggs Company, 2021). Leadership is complex and multifaceted, and exploring it beyond “introversion versus extroversion” can provide a better understanding of, and appreciation for, the attributes that individuals bring to leadership positions. Expanding this knowledge and awareness can also help support, prepare, and inspire potential leaders to rise to the occasion and navigate organizations through the intimidating challenges of an ever-changing world. 16
Works Cited Asghar, R. (2015, August 11). That Moment When A Quiet Leader Outshines The Loud Ones . Forbes. Cain, S. (2012). Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking. Crown Publishing Group. C-Suite Network. (2019, January 2). Successful Introverted CEOs . Retrieved from C-Suite Network. Cutler, A. (2014). Leadership Psychology: How the Best Leaders Inspire Their People . Kogan Page. Davis, T. (2019, March 11). What Is Self-Awareness, and How Do You Get It?: 11 ways to achieve greater self-awareness. Psychology Today. Eriksen, M. (2009). Authentic Leadership: Practical Reflexivity, Self-Awareness, and Self- Authorship . SAGE Journals. Evanish, J. (2019). 5 Ways Introverted Leadership can make You a Great Manager. Lighthouse. Fawzy, M. (2020, September 11). An Introvert’s Guide to Living with People in Quarantine. Healthline. Gaffney, S. (2020, July 27). The 15 Best Jobs for Introverts . Best Colleges. GLOBE. (2014). An overview of the 2004 study: Understanding the Relationship Between National Culture, Societal Effectiveness and Desirable Leadership Attributes. Retrieved from Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness. Granneman, J. (2017, July 31). The Reason Introverts Might 'Think Too Much'. Psychology Today. Kruse, K. (2013, April 9). What Is Leadership? . Forbes. 17
Nobel, C. (2010, October 4). Introverts: The Best Leaders for Proactive Employees. Harvard Business School: Working Knowledge. O'Mahony, P. (2019, October 8). Why extrovert CEOs may be bad for business. The Irish Times. Osman, M. (2018, January 16). 5 self-assessment tools to help you find the right professional fit. Retrieved from GoDaddy. Percy, S. (2019, June 10). Do Extroverts Make Better Leaders? . Forbes. Ross, P. (2017, January 30). If You’re an Introvert, You’re Probably Getting Screwed at Work. Observer. Rowe, A. J. (1987). Managing With Style: A Guide to Understanding, Assessing, and Improving Decision Making. Jossey-Bass. Spark, A. (2018). The failure of introverts to emerge as leaders: The role of forecasted affect. Personality and Individual Differences, 84-88. The Myers-Briggs Company. (2021). MBTI® personality types. Retrieved from The Myers- Briggs Company. Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson. 18
You can also read