ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Papula-Nevinpat

Page created by Wanda Franklin
 
CONTINUE READING
ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Papula-Nevinpat
ICLG
The International Comparative Legal Guide to:

Trade Marks 2019
8th Edition
A practical cross-border insight into trade mark work

Published by Global Legal Group, with contributions from:
Acapo AS                              Fukami Patent Office, P.C.            Moravčević Vojnović and Partners
Advance Partners                      Gowling WLG                           in cooperation with Schoenherr
Arent Fox LLP                         Hannes Snellman Attorneys Ltd.        Nater Dallafior Rechtsanwälte AG
Baptista, Monteverde & Associados,    HSM IP Ltd.                           OFO VENTURA
Sociedade de Advogados, SP, RL        Hule Bachmayr-Heyda Nordberg          OLIVARES
Bird & Bird LLP                       Rechtsanwälte GmbH                    OSH Advocates, Solicitors & Legal Consultants
Bolet & Terrero                       Kadasa Intellectual Property          Papula-Nevinpat
Borenius Attorneys Ltd                KOREJZOVA LEGAL v.o.s.                Patentna pisarna d.o.o.
Bouwers Inc.                          Koushos Korfiotis                     Pham & Associates
Camilleri Preziosi Advocates          Papacharalambous LLC                  PORZIO ∙ RIOS ∙ GARCIA
Clarke Gittens Farmer                 Law Offices of Patrinos & Kilimiris   S. P. A. Ajibade & Co.
Daniel Law                            Le Poole Bekema                       Samuriwo Attorneys
DunnCox                               Lee International IP & Law Group      Shearn Delamore & Co.
East & Concord Partners               LK Shields                            Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak
Ehrlich, Neubauer & Melzer (EN&M),    Lubberger Lehment                     Subramaniam & Associates (SNA)
of Ehrlich Group
                                      Lydian                                SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan
ELZABURU
                                      McCullough Robertson                  TIPLO Attorneys-at-Law
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
                                      Miller Thomson LLP                    United Trademark & Patent Services
FTCC Studio Legale Associato
The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Trade Marks 2019

                                 General Chapters:
                                  1   Ranging Abroad: a Spotlight on Infringements Online, and Where to Fight Them –
                                      Nick Aries & Tristan Sherliker, Bird & Bird LLP                                                                      1
                                  2   Use It or Lose It: Truer Than Ever in the U.S.A. – Karen Lim & Jason D. Jones,
                                      Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.                                                                                  6
Contributing Editor
Nick Aries,
                                 Country Question and Answer Chapters:
Bird & Bird LLP                   3   Australia                      McCullough Robertson: Belinda Breakspear & Peter Stokes                             11
Sales Director                    4   Austria                        Hule Bachmayr-Heyda Nordberg Rechtsanwälte GmbH: Emanuel Boesch                     19
Florjan Osmani
                                  5   Barbados                       Clarke Gittens Farmer: Rosalind K. Smith Millar QC                                  30
Account Director
Oliver Smith                      6   Belgium                        Lydian: Annick Mottet Haugaard & Blandine de Lange                                  37

Sales Support Manager             7   Bolivia                        Bolet & Terrero: Juan Ignacio Zapata                                                47
Toni Hayward                      8   Brazil                         Daniel Law: Robert Daniel-Shores & Roberta Arantes                                  56
Editor                            9   Canada                         Miller Thomson LLP: Catherine M. Dennis Brooks & David Reive                        67
Nicholas Catlin
                                  10 Cayman Islands                  HSM IP Ltd.: Sophie Peat & Huw Moses                                                76
Senior Editors
Caroline Collingwood              11 Chile                           PORZIO ∙ RIOS ∙ GARCIA: Cristóbal Porzio & Marcelo Correa                           84
Rachel Williams                   12 China                           East & Concord Partners: Charles (Chao) Feng                                        93
CEO                               13 Cyprus                          Koushos Korfiotis Papacharalambous LLC: Eleni Papacharalambous &
Dror Levy                                                            Georgia Charalambous                                                               103
Group Consulting Editor           14 Czech Republic                  KOREJZOVA LEGAL v.o.s.: Dr. Petra de Brantes & Mgr. Ivana Toningerová 112
Alan Falach
                                  15 Finland                         Borenius Attorneys Ltd: Åsa Krook & Ben Rapinoja                                   119
Publisher
Rory Smith                        16 France                          Gowling WLG: Céline Bey & Clémence Lapôtre                                         126

Published by                      17 Germany                         Lubberger Lehment: Anja Wulff                                                      138
Global Legal Group Ltd.           18 Greece                          Law Offices of Patrinos & Kilimiris: Maria Kilimiris & Manolis Metaxakis 146
59 Tanner Street
London SE1 3PL, UK                19 India                           Subramaniam & Associates (SNA): Hari Subramaniam & Philip Abraham                  154
Tel: +44 20 7367 0720             20 Ireland                         LK Shields: Peter Bolger & Jane O’Grady                                            163
Fax: +44 20 7407 5255
Email: info@glgroup.co.uk         21 Israel                          Ehrlich, Neubauer & Melzer (EN&M), of Ehrlich Group: Yehuda Neubauer &
URL: www.glgroup.co.uk                                               Keren Rubinstein                                                       172
GLG Cover Design                  22 Italy                           FTCC Studio Legale Associato: Filippo Canu & Pierluigi Cottafavi                   182
F&F Studio Design
                                  23 Jamaica                         DunnCox: Joanne Wood Rattray & Kelly Akin                                          192
GLG Cover Image Source
                                  24 Japan                           Fukami Patent Office, P.C.: Yoshitake Kihara & Miki Tomii                          202
iStockphoto
                                  25 Korea                           Lee International IP & Law Group: Mi-Cheong Lee & Robert M. Kim                    209
Printed by
Ashford Colour Press Ltd          26 Malaysia                        Shearn Delamore & Co.: Karen Abraham & Janet Toh                                   216
April 2019
                                  27 Malta                           Camilleri Preziosi Advocates: Steven Decesare & Sharon Xuereb                      227
Copyright © 2019                  28 Mexico                          OLIVARES: Alonso Camargo & Daniel Sanchez                                          235
Global Legal Group Ltd.
All rights reserved               29 Netherlands                     Le Poole Bekema: Anne Bekema & Laura Broers                                        245
No photocopying
                                  30 Nigeria                         S. P. A. Ajibade & Co.: John Chike Onyido & Oluwasolape Owoyemi                    254
ISBN 978-1-912509-69-0            31 Norway                          Acapo AS: Kjersti Rogne & Kjersti Staven-Garberg                                   263
ISSN 2049-3118
                                  32 Philippines                     SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan: Vida M. Panganiban-Alindogan                  270
Strategic Partners
                                  33 Poland                          Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak: Dr. (hab.) Ewa Skrzydło-Tefelska &
                                                                     Karol Gajek                                                                        279
                                  34 Portugal                        Baptista, Monteverde & Associados, Sociedade de Advogados, SP, RL:
                                                                     Filipe Teixeira Baptista & Joana Cunha Reis                                        287
                                  35 Russia                          Papula-Nevinpat: Annikki Hämäläinen                                                295
                                  36 Saudi Arabia                    Kadasa Intellectual Property: Mohammad Jomoa & Asif Iqbal                          302
                                  37 Serbia                          Moravčević Vojnović and Partners in cooperation with Schoenherr:
                                                                     Andrea Radonjanin                                                                  312

                                                                                                                               Continued Overleaf

Further copies of this book and others in the series can be ordered from the publisher. Please call +44 20 7367 0720

Disclaimer
This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice.
Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication.
This publication is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a qualified
professional when dealing with specific situations.

                                                               WWW.ICLG.COM
The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Trade Marks 2019

                  Country Question and Answer Chapters:
                   38 Slovenia               Patentna pisarna d.o.o.: Irena Kadunc & Vesna Kovič                      319
                   39 South Africa           Bouwers Inc.: Deon Bouwer & Adele Els                                    327
                   40 Spain                  ELZABURU: Fernando Ilardia & Ana Sanz                                    334
                   41 Sweden                 Hannes Snellman Attorneys Ltd.: Christopher Tehrani & Nedim Malovic      346
                   42 Switzerland            Nater Dallafior Rechtsanwälte AG: Dr. Mathis Berger                      354
                   43 Taiwan                 TIPLO Attorneys-at-Law: J. K. Lin & H. G. Chen                           362
                   44 Turkey                 OFO VENTURA: Özlem Fütman                                                373
                   45 Uganda                 OSH Advocates, Solicitors & Legal Consultants: Fredrick K. Sentomero &
                                             Doreen Mwesige                                                           383
                   46 Ukraine                Advance Partners: Oleg Zhukhevych & Maksym Kravchenko                    389
                   47 United Arab Emirates   United Trademark & Patent Services: Maria Farrukh Irfan Khan &
                                             Sarmad Hasan Manto                                                       400
                   48 United Kingdom         Bird & Bird LLP: Nick Aries & Daisy Dier James                           408
                   49 USA                    Arent Fox LLP: Michael A. Grow & James R. Davis, II                      416
                   50 Vietnam                Pham & Associates: Pham Vu Khanh Toan                                    424
                   51 Zimbabwe               Samuriwo Attorneys: Nancy Samuriwo                                       433
Chapter 35

Russia

Papula-Nevinpat                                                                                   Annikki Hämäläinen

                                                                         ■     Trade marks which are false or misleading in respect of the
    1 Relevant Authorities and Legislation                                     goods or manufacturer thereof.
                                                                         ■     Trade marks that contradict the social interests and principles
1.1   What is the relevant trade mark authority in your                        of humanity and morality.
      jurisdiction?                                                      ■     Trade marks that are confusingly similar to: the official
                                                                               names and images of valuable objects of the cultural heritage
The relevant authority is the Federal Institute of Industrial Property         of the Russian Federation; or objects of world cultural or
                                                                               natural heritage.
(FIPS).

                                                                         2.3   What information is needed to register a trade mark?
1.2   What is the relevant trade mark legislation in your
      jurisdiction?
                                                                         The following information is required:
The relevant legislation is the Russian Civil Code, part IV.             ■     Applicant’s name and address.
                                                                         ■     List of goods/services according to the international
                                                                               classification.
    2 Application for a Trade Mark
                                                                         ■     Print of the mark (not for word marks).
                                                                         ■     Priority document, if priority is claimed, together with a
2.1   What can be registered as a trade mark?                                  notarised English translation thereof if the document is not in
                                                                               English or Russian.
Verbal, pictorial, dimensional and other designations (i.e. sound        ■     Power of attorney; no notarisation or legalisation is needed.
marks) or combinations thereof, can be registered as trade marks. A
trade mark may be registered in any colour or combination of             2.4   What is the general procedure for trade mark
colours.                                                                       registration?

2.2   What cannot be registered as a trade mark?                         The registration procedure includes formal and substantive
                                                                         examinations. The examination process is relatively strict. The
                                                                         formal examination is conducted within one month of the filing of
The following may not be registered as a trade mark:
                                                                         the application. After the formal examination is completed, the
■     Signs that cannot individualise the goods or services.
                                                                         application proceeds under the substantive examination. The
■     Non-distinctive trade marks or marks consisting only of            examiners study absolute and relative grounds and, based on the
      elements:                                                          results, may issue an office action or an acceptance decision. The
      ■ which have entered into general use;                             registration fee must be paid within four months of the acceptance
      ■ which are generally accepted terms or symbols;                   decision.
      ■ which characterise the goods, including specifying the type,     The office action can be responded to within six months; no
        quality, quantity, properties, purpose or value thereof, and     extension is possible.
        also the place, time, and means of production and sale; or
      ■ which represent the form of goods which is determined
        exclusively or chiefly by the properties or purpose of the       2.5   How is a trade mark adequately represented?
        goods.
■     Trade marks consisting only of: elements representing state        A trade mark must be distinctive, can be either in colour or in black
      arms, flags, and other State symbols and marks; abbreviated or     and white, and must be submitted in a high-resolution format. A
      full names of international and intergovernmental organisations    sound trade mark shall be submitted in the form of musical notation
      and the arms, flags, and other symbols and marks thereof;          or a written description.
      official control, guarantee, or assay marks, seals, awards, and
      other marks of distinction; or elements confusingly similar to
      those mentioned above.

ICLG TO: TRADE MARKS 2019                                                                                            WWW.ICLG.COM                295
© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London
Papula-Nevinpat                                                                                                                      Russia

         2.6    How are goods and services described?                               2.16 Does your jurisdiction recognise Collective or
                                                                                         Certification marks?
         The Russian Patent Office follows, relatively strictly, the Nice
         Classification, 11th edition.                                              Russia recognises only collective trade marks.

         2.7    What territories (including dependents, colonies, etc.)                 3 Absolute Grounds for Refusal
Russia

                are or can be covered by a trade mark in your
                jurisdiction?
                                                                                    3.1   What are the absolute grounds for refusal of
         A trade mark covers only the territory of the Russian Federation.                registration?

                                                                                    A trade mark which falls within the restrictions detailed in question
         2.8    Who can own a trade mark in your jurisdiction?
                                                                                    2.2 will be refused on absolute grounds.

         A trade mark can be owned by a legal entity or by an independent
         entrepreneur.                                                              3.2   What are the ways to overcome an absolute grounds
                                                                                          objection?

         2.9    Can a trade mark acquire distinctive character                      Absolute grounds can be overcome by disclaiming the non-
                through use?
                                                                                    protectable elements or submitting documents confirming that the
                                                                                    mark has gained distinctive character through long and intensive use
         Prior use is rarely protected; essentially, only a registered trade mark   in the Russian Federation. It is also possible to provide consent from
         enjoys protection.                                                         the relevant authority to register official symbols as unprotected
                                                                                    elements of a trade mark.
         2.10 How long on average does registration take?
                                                                                    3.3   What is the right of appeal from a decision of refusal
         A smooth registration process takes about 10–12 months.                          of registration from the Intellectual Property Office?

         2.11 What is the average cost of obtaining a trade mark in                 An appeal against a rejection decision can be filed within four
              your jurisdiction?                                                    months of the date of issuance of the decision with the Patent
                                                                                    Disputes Chamber.
         The official fees for obtaining a trade mark in one Class amount to
         USD 665 including the examination and registration fee.                    3.4   What is the route of appeal?

         2.12 Is there more than one route to obtaining a                           An appeal filed with the Patent Disputes Chamber is considered at a
              registration in your jurisdiction?                                    hearing. The decision of the Patent Disputes Chamber can be
                                                                                    further appealed at the IP Court.
         National registration can be registered only through a registration
         process at the Federal Institute of Industrial Property. Russia is also
                                                                                        4 Relative Grounds for Refusal
         a member of the Madrid Agreement and Madrid Protocol, and thus
         protection can be obtained through an International Registration.
                                                                                    4.1   What are the relative grounds for refusal of
                                                                                          registration?
         2.13 Is a Power of Attorney needed?

                                                                                    The relative grounds are the following:
         Yes, a Power of Attorney is needed.
                                                                                    ■     A mark is confusingly similar to a prior trade mark
                                                                                          application/registered trade mark or well-known trade mark
         2.14 If so, does a Power of Attorney require notarisation                        applied/registered for similar goods/services.
              and/or legalisation?
                                                                                    ■     A mark is confusingly similar to a prior applied or registered
                                                                                          appellation of origin.
         No, no notarisation or legalisation is needed; the Power of Attorney       ■     A mark is confusingly similar to a prior company name,
         must simply be signed.                                                           domain name or selection achievement.
                                                                                    ■     A mark is confusingly similar to a prior design.
         2.15 How is priority claimed?
                                                                                    4.2   Are there ways to overcome a relative grounds
         Russia is a member of the Paris Convention and accepts priorities                objection?
         from Convention applications.
                                                                                    Relative grounds may be overcome by arguments, limitation of the
                                                                                    list of goods and services or a letter of consent (provided that the
                                                                                    marks do not mislead the consumer).

296      WWW.ICLG.COM                                                                                           ICLG TO: TRADE MARKS 2019
         © Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London
Papula-Nevinpat                                                                                                                    Russia

                                                                        registration fees, the Patent Office registers the mark in the State
4.3   What is the right of appeal from a decision of refusal            Register of Trade Marks and issues a registration certificate.
      of registration from the Intellectual Property Office?

An appeal against a rejection decision can be filed, within four        6.2    From which date following application do an
                                                                               applicant’s trade mark rights commence?
months of the date of issuance of the decision, with the Patent
Disputes Chamber.
                                                                        The trade mark rights commence from the application date.

                                                                                                                                                  Russia
4.4   What is the route of appeal?
                                                                        6.3    What is the term of a trade mark?

An appeal filed with the Patent Disputes Chamber is considered at a
hearing. The decision of the Patent Disputes Chamber can be             The mark is valid for 10 years from the filing date of the application.
further appealed at the IP Court.
                                                                        6.4    How is a trade mark renewed?
    5 Opposition
                                                                        The validity term can be renewed for 10 years at the request of the
                                                                        owner. The renewal request can be filed at the earliest one year prior
5.1   On what grounds can a trade mark be opposed?                      to the renewal date. Late renewal is possible within six months after
                                                                        expiration of the renewal due date.
A registration can be opposed based on absolute and relative
grounds. The absolute grounds are as follows:                             7 Registrable Transactions
■     The mark was registered despite absolute grounds of refusal.
■     The mark was not registered in the name of a legal entity or
      an independent entrepreneur.                                      7.1    Can an individual register the assignment of a trade
                                                                               mark?
■     The mark was registered in the name of the agent or
      representative of the mark’s owner in one of the Member
      States of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial   No, the assignment of a trade mark can be registered only by a legal
      Property.                                                         entity or by an independent entrepreneur.
■     The mark was registered in bad faith or as an act of unfair
      competition.
                                                                        7.2    Are there different types of assignment?
The opposition term in these cases is the whole period of trade mark
validity.                                                               The assignment can be partial, i.e. only in respect of a part of the
The relative grounds are:                                               goods/services, or can cover all registered goods and services.
■     The registered mark is confusingly similar to a prior trade
      mark application/registered trade mark, well-known trade
                                                                        7.3    Can an individual register the licensing of a trade
      mark applied/registered for similar goods/services, prior
                                                                               mark?
      applied or registered appellation of origin, prior copyright,
      famous person or prior design.
                                                                        No, the licence agreement in respect of a trade mark can be
The opposition period is five years from the publication date.
                                                                        registered only by a legal entity or by an independent entrepreneur.

5.2   Who can oppose the registration of a trade mark in
      your jurisdiction?                                                7.4    Are there different types of licence?

The opposition can be filed by an interested party.                     A licence can be exclusive or non-exclusive.         There is also a
                                                                        compulsory licence.

5.3   What is the procedure for opposition?
                                                                        7.5    Can a trade mark licensee sue for infringement?

The opposition can be filed within five years of the publication date
with the Patent Disputes Chamber. The Patent Disputes Chamber           No, this right belongs to the owners.
considers the opposition during a hearing and issues a decision. The
decision of the Patent Disputes Chamber can be appealed at the IP       7.6    Are quality control clauses necessary in a licence?
Court.
                                                                        Yes, usually they are required.
    6 Registration
                                                                        7.7    Can an individual register a security interest under a
                                                                               trade mark?
6.1   What happens when a trade mark is granted
      registration?
                                                                        No, a security interest under a trade mark can be registered only by
                                                                        a legal entity or by an independent entrepreneur.
After issuance of an acceptance decision, the registration fees must
be paid within four months. Within one month of the payment of the

ICLG TO: TRADE MARKS 2019                                                                                            WWW.ICLG.COM                 297
© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London
Papula-Nevinpat                                                                                                                      Russia

         7.8   Are there different types of security interest?                    9.2    What is the procedure for invalidation of a trade
                                                                                         mark?
         No, there are not.
                                                                                  An invalidation action can be filed within five years of the publication
                                                                                  date with the Patent Disputes Chamber, or during the whole term of
             8 Revocation                                                         the validity of the mark. The Patent Disputes Chamber considers the
Russia

                                                                                  invalidation actions during a hearing and issues a decision.
         8.1   What are the grounds for revocation of a trade mark?
                                                                                  9.3    Who can commence invalidation proceedings?
         The following are grounds for revocation:
         ■     Expiration of the validity term of a trade mark.                   The invalidation action can be filed by an interested party.
         ■     Based on a Court decision issued in respect of a collective
               trade mark, on the use of the mark for goods that do not           9.4    What grounds of defence can be raised to an
               possess common characteristics.                                           invalidation action?
         ■     Based on a decision of cancellation of a trade mark due to
               non-use.                                                           The defence can use dissimilarity arguments, prior coexistence of
         ■     Based on a decision to cancel a trade mark because of              the marks, the bad-faith argument and other arguments confirming
               invalidation of the owner due to bankruptcy.                       their position.
         ■     Based on withdrawal of a registered mark.
         ■     Based on a decision that the trade mark has lost the distinctive   9.5    What is the route of appeal from a decision of
               character and has become a commonly used word.                            invalidity?

         8.2   What is the procedure for revocation of a trade mark?              The decision of the Patent Disputes Chamber can be appealed at the
                                                                                  IP Court.
         Depending on the grounds of revocation, a request can be filed with
         the Patent Disputes Chamber or the Court.                                  10       Trade Mark Enforcement

         8.3   Who can commence revocation proceedings?
                                                                                  10.1 How and before what tribunals can a trade mark be
                                                                                       enforced against an infringer?
         Revocation proceedings based on non-use of a collective trade
         mark, or based on a decision that the trade mark has lost the
                                                                                  A trade mark can be enforced in the arbitration courts, IP Court,
         distinctive character and has become a commonly used word, can be
                                                                                  Federal Antimonopoly Committee and law enforcement agencies by
         filed by an interested person. Revocation proceedings based on
                                                                                  submitting claims.
         withdrawal of the mark can be commenced by the owner, and
         revocation proceedings based on invalidation of the owner due to
         bankruptcy can be commenced by any person.                               10.2 What are the key pre-trial procedural stages and how
                                                                                       long does it generally take for proceedings to reach
                                                                                       trial from commencement?
         8.4   What grounds of defence can be raised to a
               revocation action?
                                                                                  Usually a pre-trial dispute resolution procedure is required before
                                                                                  starting the Court proceedings in arbitrage courts and the IP Court.
         The defence can submit evidence confirming the use of the mark or
                                                                                  The pre-trial procedure lasts up to 30 days. In cancellation actions
         other documents confirming their position.
                                                                                  due to non-use cases, the pre-trial stage takes two months. The pre-
                                                                                  trial procedure is not required when appealing a decision of the
         8.5   What is the route of appeal from a decision of                     Patent Office or other governmental body.
               revocation?

                                                                                  10.3 Are (i) preliminary, and (ii) final injunctions available
         The decision of the Patent Office can be appealed at the Court; the           and if so on what basis in each case?
         decision of the IP Court can be appealed at the Court of Cassation.
                                                                                  When submitting an application for injunctions, it is necessary to
             9 Invalidity                                                         prove that the defendant has an intention not to follow the Court
                                                                                  decision (this is done so that interim measures do not become an
                                                                                  instrument of competition). In practice, this is impossible; therefore,
         9.1   What are the grounds for invalidity of a trade mark?               injunctions are approved extremely rarely and in the most
                                                                                  exceptional cases.
         It is possible to invalidate a mark on absolute or relative grounds.     However, in disputes over domain names the situation is different:
         Please see question 5.1.                                                 since the domain name can be quickly transferred to another person,
                                                                                  the Court applies injunctions to the transfer of the domain name in
                                                                                  each case.

298      WWW.ICLG.COM                                                                                          ICLG TO: TRADE MARKS 2019
         © Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London
Papula-Nevinpat                                                                                                                      Russia

10.4 Can a party be compelled to provide disclosure of                     10.10 What, if any, are the provisions for unauthorised
     relevant documents or materials to its adversary and                        threats of trade mark infringement?
     if so how?
                                                                           There are no specific provisions regarding unauthorised threats of
Yes, a party can be compelled to provide disclosure of relevant            trade mark infringement, but they may be regarded as unfair
documents. In the case that the Court finds evidence to be important       business practice.

                                                                                                                                                    Russia
for the consideration of the case, it can compel a party to provide
disclosure of this evidence. The Court issues a special ruling, which
indicates the time limit and procedure for the presentation of                 11       Defences to Infringement
evidence.
A copy of the ruling is sent to the involved parties, as well as to a      11.1 What grounds of defence can be raised by way of
third party from whom the evidence is requested by the Court. If the            non-infringement to a claim of trade mark
evidence cannot be presented, the third party must inform the Court             infringement?
of this.
In case of refusal to provide evidence, the Court may impose a fine.       Possible grounds include arguments about dissimilarity of the used
                                                                           marks and used goods/services, prior co-existence of the marks,
                                                                           plaintiff acting in bad faith, and other arguments supporting their
10.5 Are submissions or evidence presented in writing or
                                                                           position.
     orally and is there any potential for cross-examination
     of witnesses?
                                                                           11.2 What grounds of defence can be raised in addition to
Usually evidence is provided in writing. Arbitration courts prefer              non-infringement?
formal procedures. However, in some cases, the courts agree to
interview witnesses.                                                       The defence can use grounds of acting in good faith.
A witness is warned about the criminal responsibility for giving a
knowingly false testimony. The judges ask questions and after that,            12       Relief
the parties may also question the witness.

10.6 Can infringement proceedings be stayed pending                        12.1 What remedies are available for trade mark
     resolution of validity in another court or the                             infringement?
     Intellectual Property Office?
                                                                           The owner can demand seizure of the infringing goods and their
Yes, infringement proceedings can be suspended if the cases are            destruction.
related.                                                                   The owner can demand from the violator, instead of compensation for
                                                                           losses, the payment of contributory compensation in the amount of:
10.7 After what period is a claim for trade mark                           ■        between 10,000 and 5,000,000 rubles; or
     infringement time-barred?                                             ■        twice the costs of the infringed goods.

Three years from the moment the owner was supposed to find out             12.2 Are costs recoverable from the losing party and, if so,
about the infringement.                                                         how are they determined and what proportion of the
                                                                                costs can usually be recovered?
10.8 Are there criminal liabilities for trade mark
     infringement?                                                         The Court costs are reimbursed. The Court costs consist of official
                                                                           fees and the costs of the proceedings. Usually the official fees are
Yes, there are criminal liabilities, namely:                               recovered in full. In order to recover the costs for a representative,
■      Fine in the amount of between 100,000 and 300,000 rubles,           it is necessary to submit the contract with the representative and
       or in the amount of the salary or other income of the               payment documents. However, the Court can reduce the amount of
       convicted person for a period of up to two years.                   expenses if it deems them too high.
■      Compulsory work for up to 480 hours.
■      Correctional work for up to two years.                                  13       Appeal
■      Forced labour for a period of up to two years.
■      Imprisonment for up to two years with a fine of up to 80,000
                                                                           13.1 What is the right of appeal from a first instance
       rubles, or in the amount of the salary or other income of the
                                                                                judgment and is it only on a point of law?
       convicted person for a period of up to six months.

                                                                           The decisions of the arbitration courts may be appealed on matters
10.9 If so, who can pursue a criminal prosecution?                         of facts to the appellate arbitrage court (i.e. the circuit arbitrage
                                                                           court). A decision of the IP Court may be appealed at the Court of
A criminal case is initiated by the law enforcement agencies, as a         Cassation only on the points of law.
rule, either as a result of an independent verification, or on the basis
of a statement from the right holder.

ICLG TO: TRADE MARKS 2019                                                                                                WWW.ICLG.COM               299
© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London
Papula-Nevinpat                                                                                                                       Russia

         13.2 In what circumstances can new evidence be added at                        17      Current Developments
              the appeal stage?

                                                                                   17.1 What have been the significant developments in
         New evidence may be added at the appeal stage only if it could not             relation to trade marks in the last year?
         have been presented in the first instance due to a good reason.
                                                                                   On 24 July 2018, new Regulations of the Russian Patent Office
Russia

           14       Border Control Measures                                        came into force. They are aimed at developing the provisions of the
                                                                                   Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The expedited examination
                                                                                   procedure is now available. In addition, the practical examination
         14.1 Is there a mechanism for seizing or preventing the                   terms have been reduced to six or eight months.
              importation of infringing goods or services and, if so,
              how quickly are such measures resolved?                              The Constitutional Court found that it is unacceptable to destroy
                                                                                   goods that are “grey imports” and not counterfeit.
         Customs is authorised to prevent the importation of infringing
         goods and services. A trade mark can be included in the Customs           17.2 Please list three important judgments in the trade
         Register of Trade Marks by submitting a Customs surveillance                   marks and brands sphere that have been issued
         application. The registration is valid for two years, and the term can         within the last 18 months.
         be extended. After the mark has been entered in the Register,
         Customs stops suspicious goods for 10 days in order to get more           1.        Case No. А40-210165/2016 (in accordance with the claim of
         information from the trade mark owner.                                              Les Publications Condé Nast S.A. and Synergy Capital
                                                                                             against Rospatent). The lawsuit was filed for the cancellation
                                                                                             of the decision of Rospatent about a refusal to alienate 50%
           15       Other Related Rights                                                     of the exclusive right to a trade mark. On 3 December, the
                                                                                             Supreme Court of the Russian Federation rejected the claim,
                                                                                             confirming that the trade mark (non-collective) could not
         15.1 To what extent are unregistered trade mark rights                              belong to several owners simultaneously.
              enforceable in your jurisdiction?                                    2.        Case No. A55-5711 / 2014 (on the application for bankruptcy
                                                                                             of the Samara Vodka Plant LLC of Heineken Breweries). On
         No protection is provided to unregistered trade marks.                              21 March, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
                                                                                             determined that a trade mark of a bankrupt owner cannot be
                                                                                             terminated early; it can only be acquired at auction.
         15.2 To what extent does a company name offer protection                  3.        Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian
              from use by a third party?                                                     Federation of 13 February 2018 No. 8-P (according to the
                                                                                             complaint of PAG LLC). The Court found that it is
         The use of a company name by other companies engaged in similar                     unacceptable to destroy goods that are “grey imports” and not
         activities is prohibited. The marks similar to a prior tradename or                 counterfeit.
         commercial name and covering similar goods/services shall not be
         registered as trade marks.                                                17.3 Are there any significant developments expected in
                                                                                        the next year?
         15.3 Are there any other rights that confer IP protection,
              for instance book title and film title rights?                       No significant developments are expected in the coming year.

         In addition to the rights to trade marks, these rights can be protected   17.4 Are there any general practice or enforcement trends
         by copyrights.                                                                 that have become apparent in your jurisdiction over
                                                                                        the last year or so?

           16       Domain Names
                                                                                   The main trends are a gradual approach towards the legalisation of
                                                                                   parallel imports, as well as the further reduction of the role of appeal
         16.1 Who can own a domain name?                                           and cassation. The Courts charge court fees in favour of third
                                                                                   parties in cases against Rospatent; usually in these cases the third
         A domain name can be owned by any person or entity.                       parties are the owners of disputable trade marks. The Courts are
                                                                                   interested in reducing the number of lawsuits.

         16.2 How is a domain name registered?

         A domain name must be registered in the domain name Register.

         16.3 What protection does a domain name afford per se?

         The domain name gives the owner the right to use the name in the
         Internet address and an email address. A domain name does not, as
         such, confer exclusive rights.

300      WWW.ICLG.COM                                                                                             ICLG TO: TRADE MARKS 2019
         © Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London
Papula-Nevinpat                                                                                                                                Russia

                            Annikki Hämäläinen
                            Papula-Nevinpat
                            Mechelininkatu 1 a
                            00180 Helsinki
                            Finland

                            Tel:   +358 44 251 8882

                                                                                                                                                            Russia
                            Email: annikki.hamalainen@
                                   papula-nevinpat.com
                            URL: www.papula-nevinpat.com

 Ms. Annikki Hämäläinen started her intellectual property career at
 Papula-Nevinpat in 2007 in the head office in Helsinki. Having majored
 in civil law at Petrozavodsk State University (Russia) in 2005, Annikki is
 familiar with Russian legislation. She gives advice on IP matters, with
 a focus on trade marks in Russia and the CIS countries. She assists
 clients in managing their domestic and international trade mark
 portfolios through clearance and prosecution, licensing, opposition and
 cancellation proceedings, and enforcement.

 Papula-Nevinpat was founded in Finland more than 40 years ago, with a strong foothold in Eurasia. We were the first foreign IP company to set up
 an office in Russia more than 20 years ago and continue to be the biggest foreign presence there. Other offices in Eurasia include Belarus, Ukraine,
 Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Our experience in Russia and our knowledge of Russian practices are globally recognised.
 We protect and defend our clients’ patent, utility model, trade mark and design rights globally. Our experts have a profound understanding of various
 technical fields, industrial branches, and jurisdictions to protect your rights efficiently and reliably. Backed by our long experience in international
 systems and practices, we make sure your rights are properly protected. Our goal is to make complex issues simple.

ICLG TO: TRADE MARKS 2019                                                                                                       WWW.ICLG.COM                301
© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London
Current titles in the ICLG series include:
■   Alternative Investment Funds                 ■     Insurance & Reinsurance
■   Anti-Money Laundering                        ■     International Arbitration
■   Aviation Law                                 ■     Investor-State Arbitration
■   Business Crime                               ■     Lending & Secured Finance
■   Cartels & Leniency                           ■     Litigation & Dispute Resolution
■   Class & Group Actions                        ■     Merger Control
■   Competition Litigation                       ■     Mergers & Acquisitions
■   Construction & Engineering Law               ■     Mining Law
■   Copyright                                    ■     Oil & Gas Regulation
■   Corporate Governance                         ■     Outsourcing
■   Corporate Immigration                        ■     Patents
■   Corporate Investigations                     ■     Pharmaceutical Advertising
■   Corporate Recovery & Insolvency              ■     Private Client
■   Corporate Tax                                ■     Private Equity
■   Cybersecurity                                ■     Product Liability
■   Data Protection                              ■     Project Finance
■   Employment & Labour Law                      ■     Public Investment Funds
■   Enforcement of Foreign Judgments             ■     Public Procurement
■   Environment & Climate Change Law             ■     Real Estate
■   Family Law                                   ■     Securitisation
■   Financial Services Disputes                  ■     Shipping Law
■   Fintech                                      ■     Telecoms, Media & Internet
■   Franchise                                    ■     Trade Marks
■   Gambling                                     ■     Vertical Agreements and Dominant Firms

                       59 Tanner Street, London SE1 3PL, United Kingdom
                         Tel: +44 20 7367 0720 / Fax: +44 20 7407 5255
                                   Email: info@glgroup.co.uk

                                        www.iclg.com
You can also read